Thursday, August 29, 2013

Obama’s Brotherhood Terrorists Used WMD In Syria

Obama’s Brotherhood Terrorists Used WMD In Syria
Obama can’t wait to send help to his terrorist comrades in Syria under the cloak of “Assad using WMD’s” when there just isn’t any evidence of that.  There is however evidence that Obama’s own Muslim Brotherhood Jihadists are the ones using the chemical weapons on their own innocent people.   It's is sometimes referred to as the "Dead Baby Fatwa" or the "Muruna"

By de Andréa
August 29, 2013

While the UN inspectors are trying to gain permission to investigate who is responsible for launching the WMD attack, Obama is chomping at the bit threatening to attack Assad for the chemical attack.  Why…because Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood Jihad.

Recent news of a chemical weapons attack in Syria smacks of desperation.

First one must ask the question is who is most desperate right now, the Assad regime or the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist rebels?  Consider that since June, Assad’s forces have been winning.  According to a CBS News report from last month, victories for the rebels had become “increasingly rare” and that the Muslim Brotherhood-backed opposition fighters were sustaining “some of their heaviest losses” near Damascus.

And then…Saudi WMD is in hands of Syrian Rebels.  The Following videos some of which are heard only in Arabic have been translated by Walid Shoebat, trust me no one knows the Brotherhood better than Shoebat. 

The New York Times echoed this sentiment, even saying that before gaining the upper hand, concerns were that Assad would use chemical weapons; he did not.  In fact, even before Assad’s forces gained the momentum, a UN official reportedly found evidence of rebels using chemical weapons but no evidence Assad’s regime did.  This, from a Washington Times article by Shaun Waterman dated May 6, 2013:
“Testimony from victims strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin nerve gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior U.N. diplomat said Monday.
Carla del Ponte, a member of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.
But she said her panel had not yet seen any evidence of Syrian government forces using chemical weapons, according to the BBC, but she added that more investigation was needed”. [emphasis mine]

Today, while the rebels are more desperate than they were at the time of that article, evidence of rebels using chemical weapons has been uncovered; evidence Assad’s regime has used them has not.
Waterman wrote…“Rebel Free Syrian Army spokesman Louay Almokdad denied that rebels had use chemical weapons”.

That doesn’t square with a video uploaded on August 23, 2013, in which Free Syrian operatives threatened to launch chemical weapons:

This video from a Syrian TV news report shows chemicals (some of labels on these chemicals are in English) and weapons seized by the Syrian government in the rebel stronghold of Jobar. Note at the :10 mark a label that reads:“Saudi Factory for Chlorine and Alkalies”

In this video, two Syrian rebels (Muslim Brotherhood gang) can be heard coordinating an attack on a nearby building.  As smoke billows a short distance from the building, a rebel on the ground can be heard directing someone – presumably at the source of the launch – to change his direction.  At that point, the rebel from the launch point can be heard talking about using sarin gas next:

In this video of a Russia Today news report originally broadcast on or before June 16, 2013, testimony from a United Nations panel is reported to demonstrate that rebel groups – not the Assad regime – was responsible for the use of chemical weapons in general, Sarin gas in particular, which backs up the claims in the previous video. Those who attempt to discredit the report below because it is from Russia Today should have difficulty doing so when factoring in rebels above talking about using Sarin gas:

It’s significant to consider that the rebels were reportedly using chemical weapons at a time when Assad was more desperate than he is now.  Again, why would Assad use chemical weapons now and not then?  Who is more desperate at this point in the conflict?  The answer is, the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, who have no problem killing themselves (or their own) if the cause of Islam is moved forward.

Even CNN International, which has typically been quick to report favorably for the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, is hedging its bets lately, when it comes to who is responsible for the attack.

Running concurrent with the tide that turned in Assad’s favor a few months ago was another defeat for the Muslim Brotherhood – in Egypt.  That defeat has been taking place ever since Mohammed Mursi was ousted on July 3rd.  So why would Assad use chemical weapons now and not months ago, when his situation was much more precarious?

Oxford University historian Mark Almond granted Russia Today an interview and explained both why western nations are so willing to blame Assad and why rebels would have a motive to murder their own people. In response to a question about why the U.S., the U.K., and France appear so eager to blame Assad, Almond said: “Western governments… want to say ‘Gotcha’.  They have been demanding the fall of Assad for more than two-and-a-half years now and it has become increasingly frustrating that his regime has shown much more resilience than they had expected, despite the resources that they and the Gulf Kingdoms have thrown into the war on the other side.  It is also like a distraction from the embarrassment of Egypt, where we see the European and the US governments basically using weasel words to avoid any kind of condemnation of a massacre in the streets of Cairo. So there are both the specifics of Syria and the context of what is going on elsewhere in the Arab world, especially in Egypt.”

Almond gives a very interesting answer to the question about why the rebels would intentionally gas their own people: “We do have some very radical groups who would no doubt say, as they have when they have been challenged about using suicide bombers, killing innocent people, that God will recognize his own when the dead die, that he will save for heaven the justified victims and just send to hell the wicked supporters of Assad. So it is not impossible that somebody has staged this.”
Consider a man that many of the Syrian rebels show the utmost of reverence for is the Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual leader, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. When writing about a Muslim tactic known as Muruna, Qaradawi expressed when it is acceptable for Muslims to kill fellow Muslims:  “…killing Muslims whom the unbelievers use as shields… leaving these unbelievers is a danger to the Muslims, so it is permissible to kill these unbelievers even if Muslims are killed with them in the process.”  –Sourse: The Case FOR Islamophobia, p. 56

Of course, if the rebels are desperate enough, Muruna could sanction the murder of their own people if it meant bearing false witness and a blood libel that would engage external forces that want Assad removed.  As things stand today, the rebels are obviously more desperate than is the Assad regime.
Specific examples include the staged death of twelve year-old Muhammad Al-Dura by Palestinians.  Whether the child was used as a prop in a Palestinian blood-libel or was actually killed, he was clearly put in danger by Palestinians who shot at him as the news cameras rolled for a false report that aired on France 2.  They wanted to blame the Israelis.

Earlier this month in Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood supporters were caught behaving as victims of oppression at the hands of the military.  They might have gotten away with it if nothing but still shots were taken.  Unfortunately for these miscreants, video was recorded that revealed a staged, mass display of despicable behavior.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood rebels would never get away with launching chemical weapons and taking credit for it.  They’d have to do so while blaming Assad.  This, my friend, is straight out of the Nazi playbook and a violation of two major commandments – Thou shalt not murder and thou shalt not bear false witness.  However, the Muslim Brotherhood, as usual, provides more evil spin.  It bears false witness while committing murder in order to push their agenda.

In spite of all this evidence Obama is ready to give aid to the so-called rebels (The Muslim Brotherhood) preempting or not waiting for the outcome of the UN investigation.  There is a good reason for that.  He knows the UN investigators would discover what you have just read about…
Lying, bearing false witness, blood libel, and murder.

Yeah, that smells of Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood not the Assad Regime.

If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family, co-workers.  The only way to defeat the apathy and propaganda of the government controlled media is to spread the truth.  

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

No comments: