Monday, February 28, 2011

The EPA: The Shadow Government Of Tyranny

The Lie that Americans own their own land will increasingly become self-evident.

By de Andréa

No one knows more about fighting with the Government regulatory agencies than I do. Like Mrs. Sackett says they wear you down and financially break you and then ‘you’ give up.

I want it clearly understood right from the ‘get go’ that I truly love this Country and ‘that is why’ I truly hate this government. But this is not the Government of America. This government, by, for, and of the people, is truly not the government of the Constitutional Representative Republic that our Forefathers fought for in the Revolutionary War. And certainly, it is not the Government that my Father fought for in the Second World War, or that I served in the military to protect.

Americans have been defrauded by nearly every government agency in America into believing that the property that they worked so hard and so long for is really theirs. Or as in my case, the business that I built from absolutely nothing and that grew to supporting nine families plus my own was really mine. For twenty out of the thirty years that I ran my business I went from one threat and one court case to the next winning every time, but at great cost. This resulted in finally giving away a business worth ten times its sale price.

Even though the government is nearly always wrong they will bury you because they can. The so-called Environmental Protection Agencies are anything but protection agencies unless they consider their own protection. The EPA and their plethora of subsidiary Gestapo organizations have only one purpose, and that my friend is to establish their own bureaucratic power base. And if that means they trample on you --- or the environment in the presses, then ‘so be it’.

The following story of Mr. and Mrs. Mike Sackett is a prime example of the fraud in America regarding property rights…One just doesn’t have any. And please understand that this is not an isolated case, it is instead an example of the illegal, and out of control power, the Federal and the State Regulatory Agencies have.

A legal team is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in an Idaho controversy. They are warning landowners that under the compliance order procedures being used by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency virtually anyone could be told to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in permit fees – or face millions of dollars in fines and penalties – over ordinary home construction work.

A petition for certiorari has been submitted to the court by Pacific Legal, an organization working on behalf of the Sackett family of Idaho. “They own” (or they believe they own) a half-acre lot in a residential area near Priest Lake, and just wanted to build a home. After applying for, and receiving a county building permit, excavation work was begun. Then the federal EPA Gestapo swooped in with a "compliance order" that required the Sackett’s to undo the excavation work and restore the nonexistent “wetlands," then leave it for three years, at which point they could “request a permit" (not necessarily receive one) that would cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Or they could wait for the EPA to prosecute the alleged “Clean Water Act violations”, which could result in penalties of $25,000-plus per day. A classic case of government extortion, racketeering and “Black Mail”, they lose either way.

According to officials with Pacific Legal, the Sacketts' land had, or has no standing water or any continuously flowing water, and they would just like an opportunity to challenge the EPA's "wetlands" determination in court.

However, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the most criminal and most overturned court in the land, said before a court could issue a ruling on the EPA's order, the family would have to go through a years-long, $200,000.00-plus process of formally applying for a federal wetlands permit. You see, innocent until proven guilty doesn’t exist. The Sackett’s are guilty of trying to build on an so-called environmentally protected “wetland”. It could cost them a lifetime and up to $9,000,000.00 that’s nine million American worthless inflated paper dollars for those of you that are numerically challenged, to prove their innocence. You see this is why you can’t win even if you are right and you do win.

According to the petition, "Ignoring the compliance order is no option, for several reasons. First, the CWA imposes significant civil penalties for violating compliance orders”. … Just one month of noncompliance puts the landowner at risk of civil liability of $750,000.00. A year's worth of noncompliance puts the liability at $9,000,000.00.

“The Sacketts are being hit with an unconscionable an unattainable price tag for the right to challenge the feds' power play," Damien Schiff, lead attorney in the case, said in a prepared statement.

"Basic principles of due process say that the Sacketts deserve their day in court, to argue for their property rights. As we're arguing to the U.S. Supreme Court, putting an exorbitant price tag on the pursuit of justice, and the defense of property rights, is flat-out unconstitutional." The Constitution is of course something our government has ignored for the better part of a hundred years.

Mike and Chantell Sackett explained their situation themselves: "The issue in this case is simple, but critically important to all property owners, and everyone who values fair play and due process," Schiff said. "When bureaucrats try to impose ‘their will’ [not the will of the people, as in a Representative Republic] on private property, shouldn't the owners be permitted their day in court, to challenge the government's claim of control?"

Said Chantell, "They've stopped our life … I just think they're bullying us. I think they do whatever they want." The petition explains to the high court that the Sacketts "were provided no evidentiary hearing or opportunity to contest the order."

And it explains the 5th Amendment, which states, "No person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," should be applied.

The 9th Circuit conclusion "leaves property owners like the Sacketts in an impossible situation. Either go through with the permit process that you believe is completely unnecessary and spend more money than your property is worth, to 'purchase' [Pay Blackmail for] your chance at a day in court. Or, invite an enforcement action by EPA that may give you your day in court but only at the price of ruinous civil penalties [more blackmail] and, depending on the EPA's ire, criminal sanctions for underlying violations of the CWA."

Even the permitting process is not realistic, it argues.
"In many instances the agencies will not entertain a permit application until the compliance order has been resolved … For the Sacketts, that would mean (a) removing all the fill [that the county building permit approved of]; and, (b) restoring the preexisting [so-called] 'wetlands,' which would necessitate leaving the property untouched for a prolonged period of time," the brief argues.

"The reality of the Sacketts' situation is that they have been unambiguously commanded by their government not to complete their home-building project. But they must instead take expensive measures to undo the improvements that they have legally made to their land, and then maintain their land essentially as a ‘public park’ [further proof that one does not own ones own land] until the property is 'restored' to the satisfaction of the EPA. They have been threatened with frightening penalties if they do not immediately obey; but they have been refused the prompt hearing they should have received as a matter of their constitutional rights in any court." You can see that due process doesn’t exist anymore.

The legal team noted that between 1980 and 2001, the EPA issued more than 3,000 similar compliance orders every year across the nation. (A tidy some of extortion) The Federal EPA should be brought up on violations of the RICO Statutes of racketeering.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Does one need any more proof that Americans do not own their own property? It’s a fraud. Think about the logic of this case or any case of the permit process. One must always get permission from the owner of the property to do anything on a peace of the American dream. And that owner my friend, is the Government, weather it is the local, county, state, or the federal government. The permit process and the regulatory agencies once introduced and sold to a deceived public as a safety and protection issue has evolved into a tyrannical government control issue that “we the people” now need protection from.

I just wonder how many of you realize just how criminal and unconstitutional this really is. The Federal government has violated so many U.S. Constitutional laws, Federal Statutes, and state laws that the entire bureaucracy ‘according to law’, should be put away in a federal penitentiary for at least 300 years. But then the entire Federal Court system including, but not limited to, the Department of injustice, and the U.S. Supreme Court are also part of the destruction of the American Republic.

So when you think you are buying a piece of America, what you might be buying is just a lot of trouble. Do you think the Government has your “6”, or do they just stab you in it?

And like I said, even if you win --- you lose…

This is what happens, when a government by, for and of the people just sit apathetically by and let the Bearucrats boil the frog.

Remember governments, if left to their own volition ---will govern…

There may be hope on the horizon however: Read a related article.
Watch a video trailer called the Green Dragon
de Andréa

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Islamic Infiltration Of The American Bar Association


If you or your child gets caught shop lifting, they will cut off their hands. If you attend a Christian church or a Jewish synagogue they will cut off your head.

By de Andréa

I have written many articles regarding the ongoing Islamic Jihad of America. Most of the responses have been disbelief, denial, ignorance, or just plain apathy. It is all irrelevant, because the Infiltration of Islamic Jihad continues whether one is aware or believes it or not. Most are waiting for the obvious, the violent militant Jihad before they will believe that this is a true reality. The problem with that is, just as soon as you become aware, because your neighbors house was bombed, or your daughter is stoned to death because she forgot to wear her Hijaab it is too late my friend. Read a previous article, toward the end I have listed the progressive incremental surreptitious steps of Jihad. Islamic Jihad has been in the U.S. for more than 30 years. Moreover we are fast approaching the violent militant point of no return.

Just another step in the infiltration of Islamic Jihad
The American Bar Association (ABA) has decided to undertake the fight ‘for the implementation of Islamic Sharia law’. The ABA's Executive Counsel "has organized a Task Force to review the anti-Islamic Sharia legislation of 15 states -- Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.” The rest of the United States has already been introduced to some form of Jihadist Islamic Sharia Law. Is your state among them? The State of Michigan enforces Sharia law above local, State and U.S. Constitutional law and already has a larger terrorist Muslim population than the entire country of Afghanistan. And remember we are at war in Afghanistan. New York City wakes up to the call of Islmic prayer. What will it take for America to wake up from its ignorant complacency? Maybe a dirty bomb!
The goal of the ABA's Task Force is to fight against these legislative initiatives of anti-Sharia, and to develop an informal set of ‘talking points' that local opponents of these anti-Jihadist initiatives could use to make their case for turning America into the next Islamic State.
Did you know the American Bar Association has already recommended a two tier interim legal system, with Americans living under some form of Sharia law? Did you know that the state of Minnesota has already changed its entire state banking system to be Sharia Financial compliant?
Sadly, the American attorneys association is looking for excuses to support these totalitarian/Islamic Sharia laws. What do you think, should American law allow the beating of women, killing adulterers, cutting off the hands of thieves? That is Sharia law my friend, and—oh! Women would not be allowed a divorce from husbands who beat them. Looks like these deceived ignorant attorneys have too much robotic indoctrination and not enough common sense.
The ABA response, in part, "The American Bar Association has nearly 400,000 members, many of whom volunteer with any of the ABA's 2,200 entities. One of those 2,200 entities is the Section on International Law, which has elected to assemble a taskforce of several individuals to examine this issue.” Do you buy into this deception? ”We received a lot of interest from members. At this point, the task force is in the planning and organizing stage. We will keep you updated as to the progress and we may call upon some of you who expressed interest in this matter to volunteer”.
In reality, Islamic law is the most oppressive, brutal, radical, vicious and barbaric intolerant system of governance on the face of the earth. It denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and legal equality for women and non-Muslims. It dictates every aspect of ones life from hygiene to diet to your dress and the number of beats your heart can make per minute; in other words it is totally inclusive of everything…that’s EVERYTHING my friend. That's why so many states are trying to ban it. The ABA should be on the forefront of that battle, but instead they are deceived and promoting it.

An Oklahoma liberal Judge gave in to a law suite by the terrorist group called the Council on American Islamic Relations CAIR and overruled the Oklahoma Sharia ban by violating the will of 70% of the states voters. While it may be that the American people are just beginning to understand the Islamic threat to our Constitutional Republic, it is blatantly clear that our Justice system is blindly deceived.
Through the politics of multiculturalism and diversity, our cultural warlords in the mainstream media, academia and entertainment industry, strictly enforce the blasphemy laws of Islam, which command that one must not insult or slander Islam. In Muslim countries, blasphemy is punishable by death; so far in the West, it is just your character that is assassinated if you dare to speak out against the oppressive Islamic supremacist agenda. Our last line of defense has always been the rule of law. So it is particularly jarring and deeply disturbing to come upon this latest initiative from the ABA, the last line of defense against the vicious tyranny of Islmic Sharia has threatened to defect to the enemy of America and the free World.
Financial Jihad
Furthermore, the ABA's "Middle East Law committee" has promoted Sharia finance for sometime, with the same warmly positive slant. Unfortunately, the ABA is not alone in this. In late January, New York State Senator Kevin Parker introduced a bill to set up an alternative bond market that would comply with the deceptive Islamic law regarding financial transactions. Has Kevin Parker ever heard of the separation of church and state that seems to be so popular when it comes to Christianity, or in this case, mosque and state? I'll put my portfolio in my mattress before my hard-earned taxpayer dollars go to zakat (jihad), and to the promotion of Islamic terrorism and the demise of Western culture and freedom. You might want to check to see if your bank or financial institution is Sharia Finance compliant.
Meanwhile, the Los Angeles City Council passed a resolution recently that decried "Islamophobia." Using the term "Islamophobia" itself is a deceptive enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws. Islamic law commands that there be no candor or criticism of Islam. Any truthful statements about Islamic supremacism and violence are considered blasphemy. That's why it is shocking that Los Angeles, which is just this side of Sodom and Gomorrah, is passing resolutions that accord with Islamic law. No one in America cares what or who you worship; just don't force it upon us. I don't care if your ignorant enough to worship a stone, just don't throw it my way. And stop telling me how many warm fuzzy “Moderate Muslims” don’t commit Jihadi acts --- you are just blindly deceived.

Thus the Los Angeles City Council's passage of this resolution defining "Islamophobia" as a hate crime and repudiating violence against Muslims is a step back centuries into the dark ages. According to the FBI, "hate crime" against Muslims is at its lowest in a decade, while acts of jihad are accelerating at warp speed. Yet the Los Angeles City Council passes no resolutions against jihad, honor killings, misogyny, gender apartheid, Islamic anti-Semitism, Christian bashing, kuffarophobia, (hatred of non-Muslims) etc. Islam is a one way road to hell.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Sharia is being imposed across state lines, across the country, by way of these varying initiatives and the ignorance of the infiltration of stealth Jihad. We must push back now. THAT’S NOW!
And the folks at the ABA have nothing to say about any of this; because they are too busy fighting against anti-Sharia, and against pro-freedom laws. It is yet another terrible sign of an ignorantly deceived and morally inverted world.

de Andréa

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Illegal Aliens, Get Out

Arizona says --- illegal aliens are illegal so get out of our country…

By de Andréa

My parents were immigrants from a foreign country so don’t say that I am racist, anti-immigrant, or anti-American. Oh! And incidentally, they came here ‘legally’. Moreover I am a natural born citizen of the United States of America and I can prove it. I have a real birth certificate, I served in the United States armed forces and I have an American passport, I paid taxes since I was 12 years old and have never been on welfare. So, smoke on that for awhile.

The independent Sovereign States of America should take a lesson from Arizona; they may be one of the last independent thinking American pioneers.

Arizona has thumbed its nose at the tyranny of Obama and his law suit against Arizona’s new illegal alien law, you know…the same federal law that Obama refuses to obey. Is it possible that Obama himself is an illegal alien? I think I just may be moving to Arizona. Montana and Arizona are also passing legislation that could lead to a de-facto cession from this corrupt Federal Government and the dictatorship of Barack Hussein Obama. They are in affect telling the Federal Government to go suck an egg with all their tyranny and corruption. Read the article titled State Sovereignty.

Arizona is one of the few states that believe illegal aliens are; well…guess what, ‘illegal’, and not a pawn on the federal liberal communist chessboard to buy votes. In Arizona if you hire an illegal alien, you lose your business license and possibly your business.In Arizona it is illegal to harbor these criminals. Arizona has laws disallowing illegal aliens from holding jobs, getting welfare, and just being in the State, they are after all by law, criminal trespassers. So get off our property ya-all. Read the article titled America’s Secret War.

’Now’, there is an effort to go even further. The president of the Arizona state Senate introduced legislation last Monday to ban illegal aliens from state universities and community colleges, making it a crime for them to even drive in Arizona and they are including new public school reporting requirements that would cause the parents of children not here legally to keep them at home.

Anti-American activists, who are ignorant of constitutional law or likely any law, are calling the state of Arizona racist, children haters and a laundry list of hate-America names and innuendos.

Set for a hearing is SB 1611, it would also put companies that do not use a federal database to check the status of new workers. And it would require cities to evict anyone in public housing who cannot prove legal presence in this country. This will end the breast sucking free loading criminals living off of hardworking American taxpayers. Imagine, to keep your business license, you have too obey the law and use E-Verify--this will end the last of illegal aliens who steal jobs from honest Americans and legal residents. (American unemployment is now approaching 11 %). Then it ends illegal aliens from taking college seats away from the honest legal students who now get turned away because of overcrowding.

Arizona means business. All of Barack Obama’s Communist tyranny “just words” on the subject might give lift off to a hot air balloon but nothing else.
Without illegal aliens, California for example, would not have overcrowded schools, over overcrowded emergency rooms; California could balance its budget and get out of debt. Do you think the Arizona government would consider adopting California?
Probably not…

P.S. Please click on the Hyperlinks for the source of this information and don’t say that I make this stuff up.

de Andréa

Thursday, February 24, 2011

1984 Is Here


In less than 90 days, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW to carry a "National ID" card. “Let me see your papers!”

By de Andréa

Based on the provisions of The Real ID Act of 2005 the (Public Law 109-13, 119 Stat 392), Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security Regime will require the federalization of State-issued driver's licenses by May 11, 2011.

Read an earlier article titled Show Me Your Papers

The new cards, disguised as a regular drivers' license, will be biometric. Each card will store up to a gigabyte of personal data about the card holder AND it will contain a GPS tracking chip. The government will know where you are at all times.

No one is talking about this ... and certainly, this is something the Obama Dictatorship would like to keep quiet. But then, I am not one to keep quiet, not yet anyway.

Barack Obama's America is quickly becoming the historical Nazi Germany. Did you ever think you would experience invasive, Big Brother tactics in which uniformed officers ask: "Let me see your papers"

27 years later, George Orwell's "1984" BIG BROTHER has finally arrived.

According to financial limits established by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4, 2 USC 1501), this law cannot be implemented because the cost exceeds the limits the federal government can impose on the States. But we know Barack Obama the Dictator, doesn’t care what the U.S. Constitution says. SO ‘WE’ HAVE TO CARE, AND ‘WE’ HAVE TO STOP HIM.

PLEASE tell every Member of Congress to STOP any form of National I.D. cards or National Drivers' license. Tell Congress that the Real ID Act goes beyond constitutional limits, and that the American people will not be subjected to what amounts to a de-facto internal passport. This is an unlawful demand on the States and an invasion of your privacy as a free U.S. citizen. WE MUST PRESERVE OUR PERSONAL FREEDOMS at the very least within the United States of America.

In 1993 the Clinton administration tried to create a national ID card---first disguised as a national healthcare card, then as a "jobs card" disguised to keep illegal aliens from stealing jobs from U.S. citizens. Yeah right! Then in 1996, it became a national drivers' license.

If this battle is not confronted, by May 11, 2011, "Real ID" will go into effect.

You will have to carry your card to vote. You will have to carry your card to enter a federal building. You will have to carry your card to buy a plane ticket, do your banking and any transaction you make. You will have to keep your "national driver's license" on your person at all times, whether you are driving or not - you will need it whether you are playing tennis, sitting on your front porch, or walking up to the corner to catch a taxi.

These cards have the potential of tracking your every move, and every purchase you make. More frightening than that, is the federal government, for any reason can simply cancel your card electronically, thereby making you a non-person. You couldn’t buy or sell anything or go anywhere.

THOSE OF US WHO RESPECT OUR CONSTITUTION AND HOLD OUR PRIVACY AND FREEDOM IN HIGH ESTEEM, MUST ACT NOW TO STOP THIS INTRUSION. MAY 11, IS FAST APPROACHING.

Most states are already compliant well before the deadline. Personal data about you has already been taken and it has been stored in a dossier about you.

The impetus for REAL ID stemmed from recommendations from the 9/11 Commission, even though the standards established by the 9/11 Commission have already been repealed. REAL ID requires State driver's license authorities to use more stringent measures to verify Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, proof of citizenship, and immigration status. The Act prescribes 18 SEPARATE SECURITY CONTROLS that States are now required to use when issuing driver's licenses.

Moreover, this information will be available to law enforcement officials in all other States. That means the constitutional presumptions of "unreasonable search" are void, because if you are stopped in any State for anything, the police in that State can "read" the database assigned to your card and virtually "share your information" over the Internet with any other government agency in any state including the Federal Government.

The Department of Homeland [In]Security lies, by insisting the new drivers' licenses cannot be construed as a "National ID Card" because the cards are issued by the States and not the federal government. However, the Real ID Act mandates national standards and national formatting which the States must abide by in creating their "State" cards and all information is available to all federal agencies. (National ID Card)

In addition to some First Amendment concerns, the REAL ID Act violates the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, because driver's license, as such, should come under State purview, not the laws of the federal government. A federal drivers' license violates the Tenth Amendment with respect to State power, and obliterates the states' dual sovereignty with the federal government, making the State subservient to the federal government. Read a related issue State Sovereignty it may be our salvation…

We must do everything that we can to invalidate this Act by May 11, 2011.

Ultimately, just as Social Security Cards were never supposed to be used for ID purposes, Real ID drivers' license will, very quickly, become de facto national ID cards, which is why people who don't drive will still need to carry one.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This plan, or one like it, is the only way to effectively, surreptitiously, and incrementally introduce an oppressive dictatorship and complete tyranny into a once free nation. This is just another step in THE BOILING OF THE FROG!

If you don’t say something to your representatives - then who is going to? If you don’t stop this, then who? Remember the government functions at the pleasure of the governed. If it is your pleasure to live under the oppressive thumb of a central dictatorship, then do nothing, and you will get what you want.

I hope you will be pleased with it…

de Andréa

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Right To Carry

In introducing a ban on the citizens’ right to openly carry an unloaded firearm (UOC), the Los Angeles City Council may have inadvertently invited a legal challenge to the city's restrictive concealed carry weapons (CCW) policy

By de Andréa

Folks, this really illustrates the lack of intellectual mentality of our esteemed political elite’s. And would you believe, most of them are lawyers. Or, is it just true to form that this may be just another case where a lawyer/politician will always attempt to find a way to usurp the law no matter how stupid it is.

On January 21, 2011, the President of the Los Angeles City Council, Eric Garcetti introduced a motion to prepare an ordinance that would ban the constitutional right to openly carry an unloaded firearm (UOC) in the City Of Angles. No… that’s not a misspelling of the word Angels, I’ll let you figure it out. (Council File 11-0109).

In doing so, the Council has unwittingly given Second Amendment advocates an avenue for forcing the City of L.A. to issue CCW permits to carry loaded concealed firearms. The City has been notoriously resistant to issuing any CCW permits.

California is a preemptive state, which means cities like Los Angeles lack the authority to regulate the carrying of firearms thereby preempting State law. The City might dispute that, but there are also First Amendment issues. Many people who carry unconcealed, unloaded weapons do so, as an expression of political protest, do to the fact that they are denied the right to carry a loaded firearm, as guaranteed under the Second Constitutional Amendment. So UOC is activity protected under the First Amendment as well as the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment the “…right of the people to keep and bear arms…” requires government to allow people to carry a firearm in public in some manner, for immediate self-defense – that is, either openly or concealed. The Government believes it can regulate and choose the manner of carry, but it cannot legally outlaw both forms of carry.

Most California law enforcement authorities who issue CCWs do withhold those permits unless “good cause” is established by the applicant. CCW issuing authorities have historically been allowed to exercise great discretion in deciding what constitutes “good cause.” In anti-self defense jurisdictions, they abuse that discretion to require an applicant to meet the almost impossible burden of documenting an immediate specific threat to the applicant to establish “good cause.” In doing so, cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have been able to impose their anti-American anti-gun anti-self-defense political philosophy on the issuance process, and issue few or no permits. But without UOC as an option, cities with restrictive CCW policies like Los Angeles are without any defense to a Second Amendment Constitutional challenge. Moreover they could be compelled to become a “Shall Issue” jurisdiction and be forced to issue a CCW permit to any applicant who simply cites “self-defense” as good cause, regardless of whether the applicant can document a specific threat. Oops!

Politically, the City is stepping on the toes of state legislators who are unhappy with Council President Garcetti sticking his nose into an issue state legislators want to present. State Assemblymen Anthony Portantino has introduced State Assembly Bill (AB) 144, which would amend state law to ban UOC in public places statewide. State legislators will also have to grapple with the State and Federal constitutional issues with such a law.

Perhaps as a way to dance around the controversy, the LA City Council may also be in the process of declaring support for AB 144, which may wind up being a substitute for the proposed local UOC ban (See Council File 11-0002-S4).

THE BOTTOM LINE:
I can’t help but wonder just how much better off the citizens of the United States of America would be if our elected legislators would simply do their jobs of protecting the rights of the people instead of doing everything possible and in many cases to illegally destroy the foundation of this Free Nation.

I do believe that not only our elitist political legislators but the common citizen has lost sight of what the founders clearly understood about our fundamental human rights. And that is, as the Declaration of Independence clearly states that our rights do not come from the consent of the government, but were given by God as an inalienable right…and therefore cannot be infringed, changed, altered, or in anyway tampered with or modified without the consent of the giver.

The Declaration:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”
Emphasis mine

I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR…de Andréa

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

The Corrupt ATF

The ATF is involved in arms smuggling into Mexico

By de Andréa

I have written many articles on the blatant corruption of the Federal Government and its many Gestapo agencies. But this one should get an Oscar. Some resent related articles include: Our Unconstitutional Government - State Sovereignty - U.S. Government Supports Foreign Invasion

On December 14, 2010, Customs and Border Protection Agent Brian Terry was shot as he tried to capture heavily armed "bandits" targeting illegal immigrants trying to get across the border near the “War Zone’ of Rio Rico, Arizona. He died the next morning. It was a tragic incident that occurs all too frequently on our southern border. (Read a previous article titled America’s Secret War) This was made all the more tragic because --- THE SEMI-AUTOMATIC RIFLE THAT WAS USED TO KILL AGENT TERRY WAS BOUGHT BY A CRIMINAL AND THEN SMUGGLED FROM THE U.S. INTO MEXICO WITH THE HELP OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES GESTAPO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE (BATFE[G]). OR ITS LEGAL NAME THE ATF SPECIAL TAX COLLECTING DIVISION OF THE IRS.

Why a special tax collector for the IRS needs a paramilitary unit and is involved in gun smuggling I would like to know? This illegal federal criminal Gestapo agency should be abolished. Prohibition was abolished, it is unconstitutional to tax the right to keep and bear arms or any right, and if Marijuana is illegal so should tobacco. So there is no need for the ATF… unless it is just used as a Gestapo Strong Arm of this Tyrannical Federal Regime.
Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) is now demanding answers on ATF’s secret "Project Gunrunner.” Hundreds of guns were enabled by the ATF to be purchased along the border by alleged straw buyers, while ATF conducted its so-called investigation and DID NOTHING. The ATF looked the other way while these guns slipped into Mexico and into the hands of the drug cartels, and then they blamed the lack of gun laws and control in the United States for the illegal transactions.
ATF's own agents say that sometime in late 2009 or early 2010, the Phoenix office of ATF began to implement a policy of what they refer to as "walking" the illegal export of semi-automatic rifles south of the border. One agent says, "The agency was not only looking the other way but actually facilitating trafficking, threatening and punishing agents who voiced objections, covering up trace information, the truth about the gun that killed BPA Brian Terry, covering up what I.C.E. knew, and the corruption goes on and on."
The accusations against ATF and DOJ officials include but not limited to the following:
They intentionally allowed perhaps as many as 3,000 firearms "walked" across the U.S. border into Mexico.

They instructed U.S. gun dealers to proceed with questionable and illegal sales of firearms to suspected gunrunners.

They intentionally withheld information about U.S.-sanctioned gun smuggling from the Mexican government.

One of the guns ATF allowed or helped to be smuggled into Mexico was involved in the death of CBP Agent Brian Terry.

They are in tandem with the corrupt FBI, and involved in covering up ATF and DOJ culpability in items One through Four.

Why would the ATF or the BATF or the BATFE or what ever it called itself these days, promote gunrunning to Mexico and be evolved in the killing of our border guards? Answer: Well first of all they didn’t plan on getting caught, but they are doing it in order to support the false accusation of Mexico’s el Presidente Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa that all the weapons of the Drug Cartel come from the U.S. when they are actually coming from Russia through Eastern Europe. If this fabricated lie could be presented as fact, this of course in turn would support more anti-gun laws against law abiding citizens in the U.S.

I am calling on Congress to cut funding to the ATF, if not abolish the useless and unneeded agency and asking them to support Senator Grassley's investigation into "Project Gunrunner” and demanding that Congress do their job and protect the Second Amendment! This is a fight America cannot afford to lose. We are up against a powerful anti-gun lobby, and a Communist administration that is determined to take away our firearms by whatever means possible. Remember if we lose our Second Amendment rights, we will eventually lose all of our rights. Will you please join me and ‘shoot off’ an e-mail (no pun intended, well…maybe) to your representatives?

ATF officials are trying to prevent a 13% budget cut to their agency. They claim cuts will harm their work preventing firearms trafficking on the Mexican border - but the death of Agent Terry exposed how corrupt and inadequate this initiative has been.
James Cavanaugh, a retired ATF official says losing 13% of their budget "would really handicap the ATF. It's a small agency and it's a lean machine. With ATF, it would be an amputation."
I say we amputate! Or even execute the entire agency. The ATF has a very political anti American anti-Constitutional agenda in mind, and that is to take away your gun rights - even if it means allowing gun sales to criminals so they can present "false evidence" to the administration that the Second Amendment should be restricted or abolished!
For two years, we've been hearing from Holder and others in the Obama Regime about a so-called 'iron pipeline' of American guns across the border, and federal officials have been working to strip you of your rights. Wouldn't it be ironic to learn that while the Obama Dictatorship was blaming our gun rights for the drug war violence in Mexico, its own illegal gun trafficking operation was the source of illicit firearms from the U.S. ?
Note: Between 800,000 and 2.5 million lives are saved annually by firearms, frequently without even a shot being fired. Violent crime has declined during the same period when gun ownership in this country has skyrocketed. (From the FBI Statical files on violent crime in the U.S.)
The Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms. There is no language in the Constitution that allows for restricting this freedom. In fact the opposite is true… the Amendment itself says that it “…shall not be infringed.” It’s the law.
But the Obama administration and Members of Congress are still trying to take away that right that is the bottom line insurance for “…Security of a free State” especially in the wake of the Tucson shootings.
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) has introduced legislation H.R. 308, "The Large Capacity Feeding Device Act." (We should outlaw ‘McCarthy’s’ “large capacity feeding device,” I doubt she actually knows what that is!) This would criminalize the transfer and possession by law-abiding citizens of large capacity magazines that accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Penalties for violating this law include 10 YEARS IN A FEDERAL PRISON and a monetary fine. Instead of this anti-American government doing its Constitutional job of protecting this nation from a foreign invasion and arresting criminals, they are trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens that are just exercising their Constitutional rights of protecting a Free State. If a big heavy SUV runs over a child in the street, we ignorantly blame the SUV instead of the driver.
Representative Peter King (R-NY) is planning legislation that will make it illegal to carry a gun within 1,000 feet of certain high-profile government officials, including the President, Vice President, members of Congress or Judges of the Federal Judiciary. This will, of course, cause a law enforcement nightmare - and subject law-abiding citizens to criminal liability if a government official would unknowingly walk within a 1,000 feet of a CCW permit holder that has already been thoroughly investigated and approved by the FBI to carry a concealed weapon.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Anti-American, anti-gun activists are hell-bent on taking away your gun rights and all your rights, one little bill at a time. Jared Loughner shooting up a grocery store was just one more "reason" for them to try to garner public support and push these bills through Congress.

Anti-gun activists, led by the Obama regime, are doing all they can to make the connection between law-abiding citizens and deranged criminals. Even to the extent of aiding and abetting known drug dealers in the illegal purchase of guns on our soil to take them back to Mexico ... and then use them to take the lives of our brave border agents!
Those of us who have a strong desire to protect our rights to own a gun and as the Amendment says “…to secure a free state,” need to put our voice where our passion is, or you will wake up one morning soon, and find out its too late. You now exist under an oppressive state of a tyrannical dictatorship with no rights at all. If Fed can ignore part of the Constitution it can ignore it all.

I agree with Senator Grassley, who tells Attorney General Eric Holder “it's time to come clean."
This tyranny will not prevail on my watch!

Write of call your ‘Representatives’ today, and thank you for your support…

de Andréa

Monday, February 21, 2011

Wars And Rumors Of Wars

Are Muslims going to give America an early taste of the coming “Violent Militant Jihad” of America? Watch closely as America enters the last phase of Islamic Jihad, the obvious phase of Jihad ---violence and submission.

By de Andréa

A terrorist Muslim cleric is planning what he calls a rally at the White House in hopes of sparking a revolution similar to the Egyptian and all the rest of the Middle Eastern riots that would turn the United States into an Islamic state. Anjem Choudary told a reporter. "The event is a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to ‘rise up’ and ­establish the Islamic state of America."

Choudary says he expects the March 3 rally to draw thousands of supporters. The event will be sponsored by the New York-based Jihadist terrorist group "The Islamic Thinkers”.

Choudary is a British cleric and former leader of an outlawed British terrorist group known as “Islam4UK” who insisted that one day "the flag of Islam will fly over the White House" and that Americans "are the biggest criminals in the world today."

The rally or demonstration, planned for March 3, 2011 is to take place just weeks after he caused a furious reaction on Fox News: Cleric Anjem Choudary made headlines when he was interviewed by Fox News presenter Sean Hannity.

Two other British Islamic terrorists, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam, have also been asked to speak at the demonstration. Izzadeen is the hate preacher who caused fury last year when he called British soldiers 'murderers' the day he was released from jail after a three-and-a-half year sentence for inciting terrorism.

However, whether Obama will welcome his three fellow Muslim terrorists into the U.S., especially Izzadeen, remains to be seen. Even a tourist visa requires applicants to answer questions on whether they have been involved in acts of terrorism or plan to commit crimes in the U.S. the catch of course is that Muslims lie. (The Muslim doctrine of Taqiyyah, the deception of the infidel)

The East London-based cleric's anti-American stance is well-documented. Last year he led protesters in burning the American flag outside the U.S. embassy in London on September 11. And in October, he told an ABC chat show: “one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House.” He told the Daily Star: “They have seen our activities in the UK and Europe” and they have decided they want to challenge the vacuum of ­freedom and democracy and the ­people in the front line of the struggle against Islam and Muslims - the American ­government and the ­establishment.

“We are going to address ­corruption in the Senate, corrupt foreign ­policy, the mayhem around the Muslim world, the drug and ­alcohol culture, ­promiscuity and the pandemic of crime in America. 'It is only right the call is made in the heart of Western ­civilization in front of the biggest pharaoh that ­exists today, which is Barack Obama” He added: “I think the American people’s hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life. We expect thousands to come out and support us.”

Is this Islamic cleric testing the waters for the “Demand Phase” which precedes the force phase of the final militant and violent period of Jihad? Read the following, and then you decide…

Reprinted from an earlier article:
We are now in the infiltration and indoctrination phases of the silent, stealth, or soft period of the Jihadi war that has been going on right in front of our deceived tolerant and politely correct blind eyes for the past twenty five or more years.

According to the Quran and the Hadith (the Muslim Jihadist handbooks) Jihad shall be executed in two periods, the Soft or Stealth period and then the Militant or violent Period. The Stealth or soft-Jihad period is to be implemented in the host country in three overlapping phases of deception. One may not necessarily end before the next phase begins, as well as all phases may be peppered with acts of terrorism and violence which is the final phase of militancy, and control. This off an on peppering of terrorism is used as training as well as to keep the host population of infidels off balance and preoccupied with security.

1. Stealth Jihad Period
Migration phase: The first of these three stealth phases is the migration phase which continues throughout both of the Jihad periods. Muslims will immigrate or invade a country either legally or illegally, they will deceptively appear to assimilate into the host culture and concentrate on Islamic enumeration, or growing the population of Islam through immigration, propagating, and conversion.

2. Infiltration phase,
The second phase is the infiltration phase which includes the infiltration of every aspect of the host culture and society, including but not limited to all forms of government, police, military and security departments, financial industry, charitable and religious establishments etc. giving the appearance of assimilation and a moderate peaceful Muslim community --- living peacefully with the host population.

3. Indoctrination Phase
The third and final phase of Stealth or soft-Jihad, it is the indoctrination and changing phase, including the introduction and implementation of Sharia, this is the phase that we are experiencing right now in America; it is the surreptitious and incremental programming of the citizenry to accept Islam as an alternative culture and rule of Sharia law. Islam must be stopped at or before the end of this phase or we will truly be at the gates of HELL.

Militant or Violent Jihad Period
After the third phase of soft Jihad, we will then enter into the second and last of the two periods of the Jihad so-called holy war known as militant and violent Jihad - The next two phases, are the demand and the force phase. At this point it is too late to stop the agenda of Islam in ones country without blood shed.

1. The Demand Phase
The first in the militant period is the demand phase. By this time the population of Muslims in the host country will be significant. The infiltration into government local, state, and federal as well as security, the military and police agencies, schools and yes even into Christian churches and Jewish synagogs will be well established, Islam will be in the position of control, especially with the success and the support of the previous indoctrination and change and acceptance phase. The demand phase will, instead of requesting that the Islamic culture and Sharia law be considered and observed, it will now be demanded. At this stage about half of the deceived infidel citizens will wake up from their deception and tolerant acceptance of multiculturalism.
2. The Force Phase
The final phase of the Militant and violent period is the force phase. This will usher in the full blown violent terrorists phase especially when and if the demand phase is met with any resistance. We now have the birth of a new Islamic State, tyranny, violence, murder and mayhem, will occupy a normal day. At this stage, the other half of the sleeping and deceived, will think that this must be the end of the world.

THE BOTTOM LINE:
These-my friend, to one degree or another are the guidelines of Islamic Jihad that have been used for more that 1400 years to systematically “Change” country after country into an Islamic State. Moreover this is happening right here, right now, and unless we stop it soon, this will be the end of a free America. We can’t fight an enemy we won’t identify or refuse to understand. And if you are not aware of this war in America, should I advise you of your deception??? Or should I just let you snooze until you wake up long enough to hear an ‘explosion’.

de Andréa

Sunday, February 20, 2011

State Sovereignty

There ‘is’ a rebellion – ‘in America’, a new Civil War to undo the loss of State Sovereignty that has happened over the last 100 years. Since the 17th amendment of 1913, the incremental abandonment by the fed of the 9th and 10th Amendments of the peoples and “STATES RIGHTS” has existed. This is due to the destruction of the “American Federal Constitutional Republic” and representative government, and then the subsequent introduction of the tyranny of a Federal Democracy. This all began in 1913 folks!

By de Andréa

So what rights and powers do the states actually have according to the U.S. Constitution??? The States actually have any power that the Federal central government is not allowed in the main body of the U.S. Constitution. The Tenth Amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." In short, if a power cannot be found written in the U.S. Constitution as a responsibility of the Federal Government, it then belongs to the States or the people, “the common citizens” or and of the many States.

The most violated parts of the U.S. Constitution by the Federal Government since the bill of rights were signed into law at the constitutional convention is the 9th and 10th Amendments, the Ninth is “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”.

The States may finally be revolting in mass - to take back the power that the Fed has surreptitiously and incrementally stolen from the states. The states are one by one, becoming ‘referees’ of the feds' constitutionality.

A new proposal would let state committees review Federal legislation for nullification something in my opinion, the useless U.S. Supreme Court has neglected to do.
So far two states have introduced legislative plans that would set up standing commissions whose members would be tasked with reviewing "all existing federal statutes, mandates, and executive orders" to determine their constitutionality, then recommending to lawmakers whether that state should "nullify" any federal law or regulation "that is outside the scope of the powers delegated … to the federal government.” If one fully understands the ramifications of this endeavor, one could see up to 80% of the Federal Government dissolved, as well as the majority of federal law nullified, HOT DOGGY! There may be hope for this country yet…

28 more states are considering the same move. Sometimes there have been inquiries from lawmakers; and sometimes the requests for information and help have come directly from the governors' offices.

This is a huge leap beyond what already has developed among the states whose officials are telling Washington to back off on individual issues ranging from state marijuana laws, Federal anti-gun laws, National Guard control, and the imposition of Obamacare.

Already introduced in Montana and Arizona, the legislation is from The Patriots Union, a Wyoming-based organization that is taking in hand the battle against what it considers an overreaching and tyrannical federal government.

In Arizona, the bill already has overwhelming been approved 5-2 in committee, and it is now headed up the ladder in the state legislature. "Our view is we must save the states first, in order to save this nation. So that's where we focus," spokesman JB Williams said in an e-mail to me after and inquiry about the program.

Barbara Ketay, head of the organization's Constitutional Justice Division, was integral in researching and drafting the proposal, which was distributed to members of state legislatures where it now either has been introduced or is being developed.

She said her proposed legislation has options for states to describe the size and composition – or even designation – of their individual state commissions. But the focus is the rights of the states which, according to the U.S. Constitution, includes everything not specifically assigned to the federal government. "This is not anything new," she said "We just reiterated the power that the states have always had.” But she said “over the past 70 to 100 years, the "federal government has been encroaching on the rights and responsibilities of the states."

Bills such as those to nullify Obamacare or federal firearms rules are all fine, she noted. But this is a "broad sweeping bill" that will cover almost any dispute that a state would have with the federal government,

Potential to address issues
"This bill has the potential" to address a large number of issues, she said. "States have to realize they are sovereign under the law. They have a compact with the federal government. The federal government was established to serve at the pleasure of the states."

In Arizona, the "USPU Nullification Act" was introduced as SB 1433 by Sen. Lori Klein, and it's being support by several cosponsors already. It first was introduced in Montana, where House Bill 382 is sponsored by Rep. D. Skees. "If passed, the bill reasserts the states' right to nullify any federal statute, executive order or judicial intrusion which the state legislature deems unconstitutional and abusive toward the states or the people of the states," the Patriots Union explained. In other words the States are having to the the Job that the U. S. Supreme Court is charged with. The project was helped along by the work of Stand Up America, the organization run by Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely.

According the Patriots Union, "The sovereign states lost congressional representation of states' interests in 1913 with the passage of the 17th Amendment, which removed the constitutional right of each state legislature to choose two representatives of state interests, to be seated in the U.S. Senate. (This was the end of State representation and the beginning of a pure Democracy) "Since then, all branches of the federal government have increasingly acted against the best interests of the states and the people, reaching farther and farther beyond the scope and authority granted them in the U.S. Constitution and today, the federal government functions with utter disdain for both states' and individual rights."

The explanation continued, "With no legitimate venue available in which to demand redress of grievances in the legislative, executive or judicial branches of the federal government at present, we have determined that the people of each state, via their elected stated officials, must take broad but specific state measures to force the federal government to live within the confines of the U.S. Constitution and the enumerated powers."

Prohibits 'infringement' of rights
In Montana, the proposal is "an act prohibiting infringement of the state of Montana's constitutional right to nullification of any federal statute, mandate, or executive order considered unconstitutional."

It specifically repudiates
the federal belief that the "Commerce Clause," the "Necessary and Proper Clause" or the "General Welfare Clause” as foundations for complete federal control over the many states.

"Congress and the federal government are denied the power to establish laws within the state that are repugnant and obtrusive to state law and to the people within the state," it states. "[This act] serves as a notice and demand to the federal government to cease and desist all activities outside the scope of the federal government's constitutionally designated powers."

Arizona's calls for its secretary of state to "transmit copies of this act to the legislatures of the several states to assure that this state continues in the same esteem and friendship as currently exists and that this state considers union for specific national purposes and particularly those enumerated in the Constitution of the United States to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the states."

It also specifies that the President of the United States, The President of the Senate (the vice president), Speaker of the House and members of Congress be notified of the plan. They both provide that if adopted, their state committees, "may recommend for nullification existing federal statutes, mandates and executive orders enacted before the effective date of this section.” Following the committees' recommendations, the state legislatures would vote on the validity of the federal action.

'Of no effect'
"Until the vote, the issue in question is of no effect. If the legislature votes by simple majority to nullify any federal statute, mandate or executive order on the grounds of constitutionality, this state and its citizens shall not recognize or be obligated to live under the statute, mandate or executive order. Further, the "committee shall ensure that the legislature adopts and enacts all measures that may be necessary to prevent the enforcement …"

According to the Tenth Amendment Center, which advocates a return to the constitutionally delegated powers for the federal government, Thomas Jefferson advised, "Whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers ... a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy."

A multitude of nullification acts are already in the works across the nation on issues ranging from firearms freedom acts that reject some federal gun laws, a rejection of Washington's mandates on cannabis laws and even Obamacare.

Center founder Michael Boldin said the idea that states would reject a Washington demand is not radical, it's reasonable. He said what's radical is "the idea that the federal government can be the final arbiter of the extent of its own powers."

BOTTOM LINE: Maybe there is hope after all…What is interesting here, are the possibilities of action and reaction. This is something I am sure those in the fed have thought of, or maybe dreaded the thought of. If one would use the advantage of history to play out this scenario, in a lot if ways it becomes quintessential and less problematic, a series of actions by the states and subsequent reactions by the fed. At the risk of over simplification I can see something like this happening…

The States ignore or nullify the illegal and unconstitutional federal laws. The Fed threatens the States with the loss of federal funds, a tool the states didn’t have in the last Civil War. The States threaten cession and cut off personal Federal income tax revenue, again a tool that didn’t exist in the last Civil War. The Fed threatens Martial law. The States say bring it on, and the civil war begins. Any way it goes, this should be interesting…

Keep your powder dry, de Andréa

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Chrislam, How Does This Happen

It happens the moment one ignorantly allows the deceptive evil foot of Islam to step into your doorway

By de Andréa

As a follow up to my article on February 5, Titled: Islam in the Christian Church (if you haven’t read it please do so before continuing) I will attempt to answer the question that so many have asked, HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN?

Because they are progressive and provide a foundation, please make sure you have also read the second article, published February 12, titled: Obama Is Preparing American Children For Islam. At the end I explain the steps outlined in the Islamic hand book of Jihad called “The Hadith” for the systematic infiltration and subsequent conversion of a country into an Islmic State, they are the incremental steps of (Islamic JIHAD).

This same formula to achieve Islamic world domination has been used for 1400 years to create one Islamic State after another. Moreover it is now being used in Europe and in America. Islam is the most predicable and in your face enemy the world has ever encountered, and yet it is the most unknown and least understood. There is really no legitimate excuse for this ignorance except for the Western laziness of phlegmatic apathetic complacency. It truly is like watching a movie of history repeating itself over and over and over, again. One would think we would know the story line and the ugly ending by now. But instead we are deceived. We are so stuck in our ignorant deception that we won’t even turn around and look at the train coming from East to West that is about to run us down. By the time we feel the vibrations and hear the sound of it, it will have hit us full force.

So how does this satanic ideological theocracy of Islam whose agenda is to destroy every idea, philosophy, ideology, and opposing religion in the world, hope to bring 6 billion people under the oppressive supremacy of Sharia? Again! Deception…

But specifically, how do such evil anti-Christian children of Satan infiltrate the Christian Church? It is not difficult to deceive a people that are ignorant of the enemy they face, especially if they are an out of balance indoctrinated people, programmed with a perverted one-sided half truth of Christianity and benevolence to a fault. Couple that with the pressure of the new Western religious philosophy of political correctness, tolerance, multi-Culturalism, and the indoctrination of diversity, and one has the perfect storm for the benevolent acceptance of Islamic deception.

It has become increasing important to be well grounded in the truth of Gods word and to “put aside”, as Paul the Apostle said “fine points of doctrine” that become legalistic and do nothing but separate and weaken the Christian faith and family. The confusion and sidetracking of Denominationalism is what Paul was warning against in his letters to the early fledgling churches. And yet the Christian Church (especially the Protestants) has near totally ignored this biblical warning. Instead of trusting God’s word, and all of its complex and paradoxical truths that are necessary for a diverse people coming from a variety of cultures and individual backgrounds, have divided the faith and all but abandon Gods word by following the teachings of such theologians as Calvin, Luther, Wesley, and others. The result is a confusion of fractionated bits and pieces of the whole truth of God. Christians are generally lacking the whole truth because of this division that the Apostle Paul so clearly warned about.

This diversity contributes to a weak and confused Christian Church all sidetracking down a different path leading to the disaster of satanic Islamic deception.

An example of what I have tried to explain as the Islamic foot in the door and where it leads to is an article that appeared on the Fox News web site titled Churches Open Doors to Muslim Worship Watch the Fox News video discussion on the Issue. You will notice that author and interviewee Lauren Green seems to know that this isn’t a good thing, but also you will notice that she doesn’t know why… This ignorance of the Islamic ideology is what contributes to the deception that can only lead to the perversion and demise of the Christian Church. God’s word says in the last days many will be deceived and fall away. Ignorance and deception is the biggest contributing factors in this downfall.

While this ignorant practice is just a foot in the door to the infiltration of Islam into the Christian Church, it has already lead to the next step, exemplified in the perverted merger of Islam (the religion of eternal death) and Christianity (the religion of eternal life), it is called Chrislam. As the two opposing beliefs come together, Islam will devour Christianity. It is just its nature to do so… God’s word says: “no man can serve two masters he will love one and hate the other”.

To illustrate this first step of the foot in the door is the Lauren Green article “Churches Open Doors To Muslim worship”, it reads in part:

“Two Protestant churches are taking some heat from critics for opening their church buildings to Muslims needing places to worship because their own facilities were either too small, or under construction.

Heartsong Church in Cordova, Tenn., let members of the Memphis Islamic Center hold Ramadan prayers there last September. And Aldersgate United Methodist Church in Alexandria, Va., allows the Islamic Circle of North America to hold regular Friday prayers in their building while their new mosque is being
built.

Diane Bechtol of Aldersgate says this is something Christians are called to do: Be neighborly and develop relationships - even those who don't share your beliefs. "I think it's a tenet of our Christian faith, and that is that we extend hospitality to the stranger,” said Bechtol.
“We are a congregation that wants to be helpful to people and if we are asked to help a neighbor in need, that's what we do."

The U.S. Christian community is divided over whether or not to allow Muslims to use their churches as prayer space Dr. Alex McFarland, a Christian theologian and radio talk show host, charged these churches “have crossed the line from respect and tolerance, to ... affirmation and endorsement.


THE BOTTOM LINE: They ignorantly and wrongly see it as their Christian duty. Others are saying, “It extends the hand of fellowship where it was never intended to go”. The benevolent hand of Christian fellowship is not only extended to the sons of Satan, the enemy of God and his son Jesus Christ but out of ignorance and the subsequent deception of Allah/Satan, Christians are joining and enabling Islam, and out of ignorance it is not the intended other way around. .

The question of “how does this happen” is answered by understanding that it happens the moment the evil foot of Islam steps into the doorway. Whether it is in your home, your church your neighborhood or in your country there is no compromising the Christian faith and there is no ideology so fundamentally opposed to Christianity than Islam. Read a previous article titled: Islam The Biblical Antichrist

If you have watched the video of the Fox News interview you will notice the clip of the spokesperson for the church defending their position by stating, “They were not facilitating the religion of Islam”. Bad choice of words, because of their ignorance one can easily see that quite literally that’s exactly what they have done, as well as, (without intention I’m sure) they have in-fact enabled, endorsed and emboldened the satanic agenda if Islamic Jihad. Muslims see benevolence as weakness and weakness as stupidity.

As I said: The seemingly innocent Islmic foot in the door of the ignorant and deceived Christian church as an act of loving benevolence blindly toward the enemy of God has already lead to the next step of infiltration…the intergraded perversion and the merger of Christianity and Islam. Chrislam… It is coming to a Christian church near you --- turn around and look --- it might even be yours.

Something to remember through all of this is that Islam does not assimilate into your society, your culture, or your religion; you will assimilate into theirs…read your history book, this same movie has been playing on the world stage for 1400 years, moreover, it hasn’t changed.

If you have stubbornly chosen to remain ignorant, as Eve did in Eden 6000 years ago, you will have submitted yourselves to the supremacy, slavery, and deception of Allah/Satan; moreover by the time you recognize it, you will have been devoured by it. My suggestion then, is that you may as well purchase your prayer rug now before the big rush.

One certainly wouldn’t want to be caught rugless in a new Islamic State…

de Andréa

Friday, February 18, 2011

TRUTH SHOOTS HOLES IN ANTI-GUN DATA

Tyrants don’t want you to hear the truth, that’s what makes them tyrants.

By de Andréa
While anti-gun New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is sending moving billboards around the country claiming that a measly “34 Americans are murdered with guns every day”, the mayor is selectively and deceivingly ignoring the fact that thousands of lives are saved every day because firearms are there when they are needed. You know, when seconds’ count the police are just minutes away!
Chairman Alan Gottlieb of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, cited research that places the number of lives saved ‘annually’ with firearms, at between 800,000 and 2.5 million --- frequently without even a shot being fired, that translates to lives saved that Bloomberg and his hate America cronies choose to ignore. Well… that and the alphabet soup media don’t think it makes interesting copy. The truth about thousands of lives saved each day is sometimes boring and mundane. It’s the bloody 34 bodies that make headline news.

If you take the estimates and divide them by 365, Gottlieb observed, you would realize that between 2,100 and 6,800 people successfully defend their own lives every day of the year with firearms in the United States. The majority of those incidents result in nobody being injured or killed, and that’s boring. In some cases where shots are fired by armed citizens, several lives are saved. Bloomberg and his tyrannical cronies at “Mayors Against Guns” evidently don't think the thousands of lives of gun owners are valuable enough to notice. He just wants to get rid of them any way he can.

Gottlieb co-authored America Fights Back: Armed Self-Defense in a Violent Age. The book details scores of cases in which legally-armed citizens successfully defended themselves from violent attack.
What Mayor Bloomberg is not telling you with his roving billboard, is that violent crime has declined during the same period when gun ownership in this country has skyrocketed, and the number of Americans legally licensed to carry concealed handguns has risen dramatically.
Today, more than 6.2 million private citizens are legally carrying concealed guns in more than 40 states, oooooh! Doesn’t that make you shudder, and gun ownership has risen to more than 100 million and yet according to FBI data, the violent crime rate has ‘decreased’. More Guns Less Crime by well known economist and number cruncher John Lott. Watch a C-Span interview with John Lott Two very important obvious truisms that one needs to know, law abiding citizens don’t murder people, and criminals don’t obey laws. I mean come on, stop smoking those funny cigarettes, clear your head for a change, and get sober so you can think straight. Oh! And guess what? Some of Bloomberg measly 34 murders per day would be thwarted if the victim were armed. But then some of those could also result in the would-be murderer killed in self-defense. Oh well! It would save the city some unnecessary court time.

That being said, if Bloomberg would stop sniffing those pretty poppies and were really interested in public safety rather than his hate America agenda of tyranny, he would park that truck and take all the money he is spending on billboards and fuel, and give it to local gun clubs for firearms safety training and education. And then he would grant a carry permit to every law abiding citizen in the the city of New York, then in two years when the FBI violent crime stats come out, watch the numbers go down. I would literally bet my life on it. Remember, when seconds’ count, the police are minutes away.

Oh! One last thing, if guns were banned in the U.S. as Obama and Bloomberg want --- one would have to add an average of 3000 more deaths per day to that measly 34 per day that Bloomberg is shouting about. Remember, criminals can’t read…not laws anyway. Do you really think they care about the safety of children??? Yeah right!

Gun control is not about safety my friend; it’s all about the loss of all your rights and freedoms. Read the Amendment “…being necessary for the security of a ‘free State’, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall ‘not be infringed’” This is why all these Hate America Social Communists want to ban citizens guns. Without arms in the hands of private citizens (as the Framers knew very well) you will not have the security of freedom, period.

Hug a gun owner and a soldier today and thank him/her for your right to choose…

de Andréa

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

America's Secret War

Our Federal Government has been in violation of our fundamental Constitutional law since its inception…

By de Andréa

Why doesn’t the state of Missouri have any illegal aliens? Well… don’t go away, stay tuned and read on my friend. But first a little lesson in Constitutional law as well as a little back ground information might be in order.

The U.S. Constitution demands, yes read my lips, it ‘demands’ that the government of the United States of America among other things protect this Nation from any kind of foreign invasion. Check Article IV section IV of the U.S. Constitution “and shall protect each of them [referring to the states] against Invasion” and the resulting domestic violence. Yes “any kind of invasion” since the framers purposely did not stipulate a specific kind of invasion, and yet our Government has never actually protect this nation from any kind of invasion, not ever, in its history. Think about it, the only times I can remember being attracted was 1941 and 2001 and there was no defense there, no protection, none whatsoever. As a mater of fact it violates its own federal congressional law, by ‘encouraging’ this illegal invasion of criminals,terrorists, and war that no one seems to want to address. Moreover, Obama has sued the state of Arizona for passing a parallel law. The Fed will not only, not do its ‘Constitutionally Mandated job’, of protecting this nation from “Invasion and violence”, but it strong arms anyone that tries to do their job for them.

So what is this secret war?
Most people don’t even know about the war that rages on our southern border. Yes a real ‘honest to badness’ “WAR”, guns, shooting and everything. The people living there certainly know about it, some of them have been killed in this war. In many places Americans dare not get within 30 miles of the border because the Mexican Coyotes, (human traffickers) the Mexican International MS13 Gang, and the Mexican drug cartel that controls Mexico, has taken hundreds of square miles of American territory along the border. Moreover, ‘THEY’ defend it with a paramilitary army that is better equipped and exceeds that of our own border patrol. The Federal DOT has even cooperated with the invading enemy and put up signs warning American citizens to proceed at their own risk into the war zone, instead of the Fed doing its constitutional job of protecting the people. In addition, if any American including border guards goes into any of these U.S. Federally protected war zone areas and protects themselves and or their families, and in self-defense, happens to kill or injure one of the illegal enemy invaders the American is the one in trouble, not the enemy invader. It’s unfortunately the same kind of warfare and rules of engagement that are being used in the Middle East. Moreover if these were only poor starving Mexicans just looking for a better life one might be inclined to offer some kind of support. But along with the poor starving Mexican nationals are the worst dregs of Mexico and even that, one might learn to tolerate, but a large number of those so-called poor oppressed and starving Mexicans are Middle Eastern Muslim Terrorists my friend, friends of Obama. Read a previous article titled – U.S. Government supports foreign invasion.

So what is Missouri’s approach to the problem of the constitutionally illegal alien enemy invasion? Well it appears to be more advanced, more sophisticated, and strict and more effective than anything to date in Arizona or that the Fed has ‘ever’ done in American history, ‘they enforce the law’. Hey! Now ‘that’s’ an interesting concept. It Kind’a causes one to wonder doesn’t it, why we haven’t tried that in over two hundred years? Do the anti-American loonies in the criminal illegal alien and terrorists sanctuary of San Francisco, or the treasonous Islmic White House, appreciate what Missouri has done? When are this hate-America President and his communist Attorney General going to take action to require Missouri to resume accepting and supporting these socially dependant illegal invading aliens and Muslim terrorists once again?
So, why doesn't Missouri receive any attention?
Answer: There are no illegals in Missouri to demonstrate or complain. This however, may not last if the word gets out. Missouri, the "Show Me" state has once again showed us how it should be done.

So what has Missouri done really?
It’s simple, for starters, in 2007; Missouri placed on the ballot a proposed State constitutional amendment designating English as the official language of Missouri. Every country in the world has an official language except the United States. In November 2008, nearly 90% voted in favor! Thus English became the official language for ALL governmental activity in Missouri. The result, no individual has the right to demand government services in a language OTHER than English. You have the right to say huh! What language? Or anything else your American politically correct or incorrect mind can think of to say, but Missouri’s language is American-English. Not Mexican-Spanish or French Polynesian, or Mandarin Chinese or Ancient Arabic, just “English”. I think any kind of English is acceptable, British, Australian, Canadian, Alabama, whatever. Now just wait until Obama’s Muslim DOE makes Arabic mandatory in Missouri schools as it did in a Texas suburb. Read the story: Titled - Obama is preparing American children for an Islamic State.
In 2008, similar to the Federal and Arizona’s law a measure was passed that required the Missouri Highway Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration status of any person arrested, and to inform federal authorities if the person is found to be in the state of Missouri illegally. Missouri law enforcement offices receive specific training with respect to enforcement of the federal immigration law. In Missouri, illegal aliens or illegal Muslim terrorists do NOT have access to taxpayer’s benefits such as food stamps and health care through Missouri HealthNET.
In 2009 a measure was passed that ensures Missouri’s public institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to individuals who are illegally in the United States. All post-secondary institutions of higher education are to annually certify to the Missouri Dept. of Higher Education that they have NOT knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States.So while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is important to remember Missouri has been far more proactive in addressing this horrific problem. And because they are proactive instead of reactive as the Fed is, Missouri is successful. Missouri has made it clear that illegal invading aliens including Obama’s Terrorist Friends are NOT welcome in their state and they will certainly NOT receive public benefits at the expense of Missouri taxpayers.

The result, no known illegal invading aliens in the state of Missouri as it should be. Here is the link to the Ozark Sentinel weekly news story: Be sure to read the readers comments too. http://www.ozarkssentinel.com/missouri-ahead-of-the-game-in-dealing-with-illegal-immigrants-p1034.htm

THE BOTTOM LINE: If you care at all about the path your criminal government is deceptively leading you down, you might want to send an e-mail to your State assemblyman. Or if you want to be oppressively politically correct, then it might be your “Assemblyperson” as well as your federal representative and ask them why we can’t be ‘legally’ correct like Missouri and Arizona rather then “politically correct”, allowing this damaging illegal foreign invasion and the murdering attack on our own citizens and our own country.

What we need, I guess, is more brainwashing, of liberal diversity, multi-cultural tolerance, and anger management training. That should do away with the philosophy of freedom and all that American conservative nonsense like that nasty Constitutional law and stuff…

Don’t you just hate it when that happens???

de Andréa