Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Muslims Against Shariah Part I

Now there is an oxymoron if I have ever heard one. A group of Muslims are exercising the doctrine of “Taqiyyah”’ (True Lies) on a blog site called Muslims Against Sharia look it up.

By de Andréa

The name alone, though it sounds like a step in the right direction especially for a Muslim, is diametrically opposed to the Quran. In other words without Shariah law there is no Islam. This is tantamount to advocating ‘Christians against the Ten Commandments and all the teachings of Christ’. What would be left???

If one is only slightly familiar with the history and the teachings of Islam one would see this as a sham and another deception of Islam to get Infidels to accept “Mainstream Islam” as moderate, middle of the road and best of all, your “warm and fuzzy” friend.

The following Homepage right off the site was sent to me by one of my readers, I will attempt to expose the lies behind the truth, which is the tool of “Taqiyyah” a supernatural deception of Allah taught in the Quran. The words in italics are from the web site the rest are mine.


To educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed
My response: Question…have you then written a new Quran for Muslims? Bear in mind when Christianity was reformed the Bible was not rewritten.

To educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists)
My response: These are all identities given to Islam by ignorant Westerners, not Muslims.

To educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror.
My response: To educate non Muslims, means to indoctrinate Infidels with Taqiyyah (true lies or deception). As for Muslims are victims, this is because Muslims who aren’t really Muslims are worse than Infidels, they are apostates, and the Quran orders their death.

Acknowledging mistakesThe majority of the terrorist acts of the last three decades, including the 9/11 attacks, were perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists in the name of Islam. We, as Muslims, find it abhorrent that Islam is used to murder millions of innocent people, Muslims, and non-Muslims alike.
My response: Approximately when was it discovered that the Quran had been chanced? There are original copies of the Quran dating back to early 700 AD, only 90 years after Allah presented his will and manifesto to his prophet Muhammad. Moreover Islam was infiltrating Europe in the middle of the 8th century for the very same purpose and agenda written on the Quran, more than 300 years before the Crusades began, and that same agenda is being carried out today. The Quran has been corrupted alright, it was corrupt when it was written and has been the same since its inception, and always will be.

Inconsistencies in the KoranUnfortunately, Islamic religious texts, included the Koran and the Hadith contain many passages, which call for Islamic domination and incite violence against non-Muslims. It is time to change that. Muslim fundamentalists believe that the Koran is the literal word of Allah. But could Allah, the most Merciful, the most Compassionate, command mass slaughter of people whose only fault is being non-Muslim?
My response: Who, in their right mind would dare to change what their god has written. If Muslims believe that their god Allah wrote the words in the Quran, and that this is Allah’s will, moreover, it cannot be proved that the Quran was ever changed or corrupted at some time in history, how could his followers just change what He wrote, unless an original manuscript could be found dating back to 610 AD depicting all the ideologies contained in this Manifesto? As far as Allah being Compassionate and Merciful, where is that written in the Quran?

The Koran & the BibleMany Bible figures from Adam to Jesus (Isa) are considered to be prophets and are respected by Islam. Islamic scholars however believe that both the Old and the New Testament came from God, but that they were corrupted by the Jews and Christians over time. Could it be possible that the Koran itself was corrupted by Muslims over the last thirteen centuries?
My response: I am certainly glad to hear that Islamic scholars believe as well as Christians do, that the Bible is the inspired word and the will of God. But at what point in history did both the Jewish Torah and the rest of the Old Testament and the whole New Testament come to all be corrupted. Between two religions and a plethora of documents that must have been quite an organized conspiracy. Moreover you ask the question: “Could it be possible that the Koran itself was corrupted by Muslims over the last thirteen centuries?” Who are you asking, --- me? I would strongly suggest that you find some hard evidence that is contrary to the historical documents that already exist, before you create a new religion and a new god.

The need for reform Islam, in its present form, is not compatible with principles of freedom and democracy. Twenty-first century Muslims have two options: we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century perpetuated by Hassan al-Banna, Abdullah Azzam, Yassir Arafat, Ruhollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Hamas, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, etc., leading to a global war between Dar al-Islam (Islamic World) and Dar al-Harb (non-Islamic World), or we can reform Islam to keep our rich cultural heritage and to cleanse our religion from the reviled relics of the past. We, as Muslims who desire to live in harmony with people of other religions, agnostics, and atheists choose the latter option. We can no longer allow Islamic extremists to use our religion as a weapon. We must protect future generations of Muslims from being brainwashed by the Islamic radicals. If we do not stop the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, our children will become homicidal zombies.
My response: Oh…Wow! I couldn’t improve on that paragraph if I tried… a classic example of ”Taqiyyah”---and a true statement if I have ever read one. The problem that I have with it and you should as well, is the part: “we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century” You see Islam was born in the seventh century, Allah appeared to Muhammad as the angel Gabriel and gave him the words of the Quran in 610 AD, the Seventh Century… And yes, as you say, if we do not stop the spread of Islam our children will become homicidal zombies--- and the world, which is the agenda of Islam written all through the Quran, will be dominated by Shariah law and Islamic oppression. Moreover these modern figures and organizations did not originate the murderous agenda of Islam, Allah did in the Quran.

.Accepting responsibilities:To start the healing process, we must acknowledge evils done by Muslims in the name of Islam and accept responsibility for those evils. We must remove evil passages from Islamic religious texts, so that future generations of Muslims will not be confused by conflicting messages. Our religious message should be loud and clear: Islam is peace; Islam is love; Islam is light. War, murder, violence, divisiveness, & discrimination are not Islamic values.
My response: Acknowledging evil goes without saying, but just how do you plan on accepting responsibly for all the death and terror and destruction in the world for the past 1400 years of Islam’s existence? Removing Shariah law from the Quran and all the evil from Islam isn’t going to cut it.

It isn’t going to bring back Daniel Pearl an American journalists beheaded in the most gross and torturous way just because he was an American and believed in freedom. It isn’t going to bring back the lives of American merchants 200 years ago off the coast of Tripoli. It isn’t going tobring back the lives of European women tortured to death before the time of the Crusades, just because they had been raped by Muslims or refused to ware a Hijaab. It isn’t going to bring back the lives of the Christian Lebanese who were stopped on the road to Beirut in the 1970’s and executed just because it said on their drivers license that they were Christian. It isn’t going to bring back all the lives of those murdered in Darfur simply because they were there. And it certainly isn’t going to bring back the 3000 people who died on 9/11 2001. No--- by creating a new religion out of an old theocracy you aren’t going to change anything. Writing a new Quran isn’t the answer, you said that Islam should reflect peace love and light, something not found in the Quran or in the entire Nation of Islam, but guess what…those values are already found in the Bible. Jesus taught them to his disciples. Peace, Love and Light cannot come out of a Nation or from a god of War, Hate, and darkness. [Read , Because They Hate, by Brigitte Gabriel. ] Those values come only from Jehovah the God of all, The God of love, the Creator of all things. Wouldn’t it be more sensible to join a religion that has been teaching those values since before Islam existed, and where one doesn’t have to die for one own sins because God's son Jesus already forgave you and died for you?

Religious privacyReligion is the private matter of every individual. Any person should be able to freely practice any religion as long as the practice does not interfere with the local laws, and no person must be forced to practice any religion. Just as people are created equal, there is no one religion that is superior to another. Any set of beliefs that is spread by force is fundamentally immoral; it is no longer a religion, but a political ideology
My response: Again, for the most part, true, except religion is not usually a private matter although it should be a personal matter of adoption. And never by force, something that is not taught in the Quran, but again is taught in the Christian Bible. However the Statement “there is no one religion that is superior to another.” Is false, heaven is not like Paris France, where all roads lead. If one wants to go to heaven, one must pay the price which is death and dead people don’t go to heaven. But you see God made a way, one must only repent and accept that the payment has been made, even for an ex-Muslim, by God’s only son Jesus Christ. He paid the price for ex-Muslims, ex-Buddhists, ex-Hindus, ex-everybody, even Christians and Jews.
EqualityIslam is one of the many of the world's religions. There will be no Peace and Harmony in the World if Muslims and non-Muslims do not have equal rights. Islamic supremacy doctrine is just as repulsive as Aryan supremacy doctrine. History clearly shows what happens to the society whose members consider themselves above other peoples. All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy.
My response: That moves in the right direction, but as usual it doesn’t go far enough. It should read –there will be no Peace and Harmony as long as there are Muslims. There have been Muslims for 1398 years and for 1398 years there has been no peace and harmony between Muslims and anyone in the rest of the world. And the part: “All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy. You must eliminate the word “moderate” so it will read-- All Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy and dominance.
ShariaSharia Law must be abolished, because it is incompatible with norms of modern society. My response: Again I agree, but I still can’t help but wonder, what of Islam is left, after one abandons Shariah and all the evil of the Quran? My answer—Christianity.

Outdated practicesAny practices that might have been acceptable in the Seventh Century; i.e., stoning, cutting off body parts, marrying and/or having sex with children or animals, must be condemned by every Muslim.
My response: This goes without saying; however when, where and by whom, in the seventh century was the rape of a child or having sex with animals ever accepted by anyone except Islam? And how is a nation that is stuck in the 7th century going to condemn and abolish all practices that are derived from their “holy book” in the 7th century and still have a religion.

Outdated verses click on thisThe following verses promote divisiveness and religious hatred, bigotry and discrimination. They must be either removed from the Koran or declared outdated and invalid, and marked as such.
Outdated words & phrasesUse of the following words and phrases or their variations must be prohibited during religious services:

• Infidel / Unbeliever: these terms have negative connotation and promote divisiveness and animosity; Islam is not the only religion

• Jihad: this word is often interpreted as Holy War against non-Muslims

• Mujaheed / Holy Warrior: no more wars in the name of Islam

• American (Christian / Crusader / Israeli / Zionist) occupation: these terms promote bigotry; at this point in time, Muslims living in non-Muslim lands have more freedoms than Muslims living in Muslim lands
Islam vs. violenceIslam has no place for violence. Any person calling for an act of violence in the name of Islam must be promptly excommunicated. Any grievances must be addressed by lawful authorities. It is the religious and civic duty of every Muslim to unconditionally condemn any act of terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam. Any Muslim group that has ties to terrorism in any way, shape, or form, must be universally condemned by both religious and secular Muslims.
My only comment is a question: What is a secular Muslim? Islam is full of contradictions isn’t it?

Portrayal of ProphetsWhile portrayal of Prophets is not an acceptable practice in Islam could be personally offensive to some Muslims, other religions do not have such restrictions. Therefore, the portrayal of the Prophets must be treated as a manifestation of free expression. My response: This is another contradiction to Islam, freedom of any kind, on any level is contrary to the very basic core foundation of Islam.

The Crusades vs. The InquisitionWhile the Inquisition was a repulsive practice by Christian Fundamentalists, the Crusades were not unprovoked acts of aggression, but rather attempts to recapture formerly Christian lands controlled by Muslims.
My response: The Inquisitions may have been repulsive but they were conducted by the Catholic Church, because Islam was repulsive. Moreover the Crusades were not just “to recapture formerly Christian lands controlled by Muslims”, but to stop the Jihad that was perpetrated by Islam all over Europe just as it is today, it actually has never stopped. Moreover it will never stop as long as there are Muslims.

Brothers and Sisters!Do not make the next generation of Muslims clean up your mess!Fight Islamic Fascism now, so your children won't have to!

THE BOTTOM LINE: This whole concept sounds commendable and may even appeal to some ignorant Westerners who have no understanding of Islam. However, by gutting the religion of Islam as this manifesto suggests, would leave Islam without a god, without any foundation, without an agenda, without a mission, without identification, without a future, basically, without a religion.

Moreover if, as this manifesto implies, that Islam would replace all the evil and lies in Islam with good a truth, well… one would have a religion resembling Christianity.

I suggest that Christians read the Quran in order to gain an understanding of who their enemy is. And I suggest that Muslims read the Bible before they make plans to recreate a bad ideology, otherwise Islam will never be anything more than what it is. And Christians will just continue to be enablers of the evil Nation of Islam.

I hope as you read this manifesto that you click on the heading, [Outdated verses] and read at least some of what the Quran teaches. It may help you become somewhat aware of why Muslims do what they do. And these verses aren’t outdated, they are just evil.

And finally, I make a similar appeal as do the “Muslims Against Sharia”.
Brothers and Sisters! Do not make the next generation of Christians clean up your mess! Fight Islam now, so your children won't have to! [Watch Videos]

de Andréa

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Imams Proselytize Our Troops

With the blessings of the U.S. government, Muslim chaplain imam appointments were made and approved by Abdurahman Alamoudi, a convicted al-Qaida terrorist.

By de Andréa

The cultural Jihad of America continues…
Fearing the radicalization of U.S. soldiers, the leader of the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus has just now called for a government investigation of all Muslim chaplains serving in the U.S. military to determine whether they have ties to Islamic groups. Yeah, yah think???

WHEN…, when is our deceived blind government going to wake up? Answer, never, unless you… bash their door down and shake them awake. Yes there are a few in government who stir from their comas from time to time, and wonder if something isn’t quite right as Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., who says “the Pentagon has failed to vet properly the Muslim chaplains ministering (indoctrinating) to U.S forces since it first set up its Muslim chaplain corps 15 years ago.” For 15 years, Muslim imams, appointed by a convicted terrorist have been allowed to brainwash our troops with the deceptive ideology of Islam. If this doesn’t scare you out of your sneakers then you are asleep as well, or maybe brain dead.

The military chaplains were approved by a convicted terrorist supporter who at the time headed the American Muslim Council, (another terrorist organization) Abdurahman Alamoudi is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence on federal terrorism charges. You see they think that in 23 years he will have changed into a warm fuzzy Muslim. [Presto Chango] Oh! Contraire, he will likely convert dozens of prisoners to Islam.

The U.S. Department of Treasury in 2005 announced in a statement that "Alamoudi had a close relationship with al-Qaida and had raised money for al-Qaida in the United States."
According to Myrick, the chaplains he sponsored have not been re-screened since his sentencing. What our sleeping blind deceived Department of Treasury doesn’t understand is that all Muslims and Muslim organizations raise money for al-Qaida, Hamas Hezbollah, and other Wahhabist terrorist groups, these are their charities. Just like all criminals commit crimes. This is just what they do.

“Alamoudi appointed Muslim chaplains throughout the military. He is now in jail on charges of terrorism," Myrick said. "The chaplains to my knowledge are still in their current positions."

Myrick added that "even though there may be nothing wrong with the Muslim chaplains that he approved, it seems logical that our government would re-check the chaplains who were approved by a convicted terrorist.”

You see, even the whistle blowers are deceived, even though she is certainly moving in the right direction, this deception is so powerful and runs so deep that even people in government who still are rational and think with some form of logic, still see as if through a dirty window. She thinks that maybe at least some of the “Muslims” might be warm and fuzzy. It is very difficult for me to understand why people still don’t know that all Muslims serve the same god, all follow the same Shariah laws, all follow the same prophet, all believe the words in the same book, and all pursue the same agenda. Why wouldn’t one understand then, that all Muslims are, well…Muslims. It’s not rocket science.

In January 2007, Myrick founded the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus. The bipartisan group, with more than 120 members and headed by Myrick and Reps. Bud Cramer, D-Ala., and Jane Harman, D-Calif., was formed to allow members to meet with terrorism experts and become educated about the dangers radical Islamists pose to America.

The caucus meets twice a month and hears from terrorism experts, including Ken Pollack, Steve Emerson, Walid Phares, Gen. Anthony Zinni and Lawrence Wright.
Myrick, who is up for re-election this year, has been working on numerous issues related to so-called radical Islamists, such as writing letters to the Department of Justice and FBI taking issue with their outreach to radical groups, as well as looking into similar issues at the Pentagon. Read the stories about the firing of Pentagon experts and hiring Muslims terrorists in their place to advise the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Click here)

Myrick's call for a formal probe of Muslim chaplains coincides with her release of an ambitious 10-point legislative agenda, dubbed "Wake Up America.” She says “Washington is not doing enough to protect the nation from the threat from radical Islam, and the public as a consequence has grown complacent. People would rather watch 'American Idol.'". She’s got that right…

She also is calling for a government investigation of all U.S. prison chaplains who were approved by Alamoudi. At least one Muslim cleric who contracted with the Federal Bureau of Prisons in New York had supported al-Qaida and the 9/11 hijackings.

The FBI says U.S. prisons are a top recruiting ground for al-Qaida now that it is trying to lower its Arab profile and recruit American converts.

In addition, the congresswoman will ask the Government Accountability Office to investigate the selection process of Arabic translators hired by the FBI and Department of Defense. Read the story’s about our Islamic FBI (Click here)

Since 9/11, several federal translators have been charged with espionage-related crimes, according to Paul Sperry, author of "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington."

Myrick complains that the FBI, desperate to hire Arabic-speaking translators and agents, is currently recruiting candidates through pro-jihad publications, organizations, and even mosques connected to the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood.

As part of her 10-point agenda, Myrick also plans to ask the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the Council on American-Islamic Relations' non-profit status, which restricts lobbying on behalf of foreign governments.

U.S. prosecutors say CAIR, which receives financing from Saudi and UAE sheiks, is a foreign-funded front for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. The Brotherhood has a stated objective of destroying America from within, and Hamas is an officially designated terrorist group.

U.S. prosecutors last year named the Washington-based CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in a scheme to funnel more than $12 million to Hamas suicide bombers and their families. CAIR's ethnic-Palestinian founder was listed as a Brotherhood leader in America. More than a dozen CAIR officials have been caught up in counterterrorism investigations, with several landing in jail.

CAIR insists it receives most of its money from member dues and none from foreign governments, CAIR spokesman dismissed Myrick's concerns as Islamophobic." It sounds like your usual laundry list of talking points you can see on anti-Muslim hate sites on the Internet," said CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper, who in the past has stated his desire to see America become an Islamic state.

Myrick says she will also introduce a bill making it an act of sedition or treason to preach or publish materials that call for violent jihad and the death of Americans or the destruction of American property. She will also ask GAO to conduct an audit to verify the total amount of sovereign wealth fund investment from the Middle East in the United States.

What's more, she says she will rally Congress to cancel the scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their textbooks. Despite promises by the Saudi government to reform its texts, independent reviews show they still preach hatred and violence against Westerners.

The State Department plans to double the number of student visas issued to young Saudi men from 15,000 to 30,000 -- despite the fact that nearly all of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals who immigrated to the U.S. on visas. "We aim to increase their numbers to 30,000 over the next five years," U.S. Ambassador Ford Fraker this month told Saudi officials at the Al-Jouf Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

In the past, a large number of Saudi students have failed to show up for classes, coast to coast, and have overstayed their visas. Many of them have been caught up in terrorism investigations.

In addition, Myrick will introduce a bill to restrict R-1 religious visas for Muslim clerics who come from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and other countries that do not allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

Since 9/11, several foreign imams have been prosecuted or deported for soliciting jihad, including a well known Pakistani cleric in Lodi, Calif.

Myrick also plans as part of her anti-terror legislative action to introduce a bill to cancel U.S. contracts to train Saudi police and other security forces in U.S. counterterrorism tactics until the Saudis certify the prosecution of designated al-Qaida financiers as well as the detention of so-called repatriated Guantanamo terrorists whom the Saudis have released back into the general population after being "rehabilitated." Oh yes…painting a tiger white to look like a warm fuzzy lamb. Gitmo detainees repatriated to Saudi Arabia have re-joined the jihad against U.S. troops overseas. Finally, Myrick says she will introduce or sponsor a bill to block the sale of sensitive military munitions – especially Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM’s) to Saudi Arabia including so-called smart bombs.

Myrick’s ten point plan “Wake Up America” Agenda

1. Will call for a government investigation of all US military chaplains who were approved by Abdurahman Alamoudi.

2. Will call for a government investigation of all US prison chaplains who were approved by Abdurahman Alamoudi.

3. Will call for the Government Accounting Office (GAO) to investigate the selection process of Arabic translators in the FBI and DoD.

4. Will call for the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) 501(c)(3) non-profit status which restricts “lobbying on behalf of a foreign government”.

5. Introduce a bill to make the preaching, publication, or distribution of materials that call for the death of American citizens, attacks on the United States Government or Armed Forces, or the financing of the means and/or operations to accomplish these acts, acts of sedition and/or solicitation of treason.

6. Will call on the Government Accountability Office to conduct an audit to verify the total sovereign wealth fund investment in the United States.

7. Will attempt to cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their textbooks.

8. Will introduce a bill to restrict R-1/R-2 religious visas for imams who come from countries that do not allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

9. Will introduce a bill to cancel contracts to train Saudi police and other security forces in US Counterterrorism tactics until the Saudi’s certify the prosecution of Al Qaeda financiers, like Yasin al-Kadi, and the detention of repatriated Guantanamo terrorists that keep being released into the general population after being “rehabilitated”.

10. Will introduce or sponsor a bill to block the sale of sensitive military munitions, especially Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), to Saudi Arabia.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Despite the fact that all this investigation seems like a great idea and it certainly is, I know, and I hope that you know, that this is as far as it will go without any support from you. The BIG question that begs to be asked here is…How did we get here in the first place??? Answer, ignorance, complacency, deception, and likely a plethora of other reasons.

The important thing however, is that we know and understand where we are in this mess before it is too late, and there will be a day soon when it will be too late to clean it up. A day like in the 1970’s in Lebanon when the cultural infiltration of Islam into their Christian Democratic society evolved into violent militant Jihad in the streets of Beirut, and Lebanon became the Islamic terrorist theocracy that it is today.

I know, I know, you think it can’t happen here. Well you’re wrong, it can, and it will, unless you my friend are willing to join others and fight Islam now. If you don’t fight them now, you will fight them later in your cities and streets. And if you don’t fight them then, you will live as slaves under Islamic oppression or you and your families will be dead.

Please write your congressman today and urge, no… politely demand, that he or she support any bill authored by Congressman Sue Myrick, R-N.C. that calls for the investigation and or the immediate dismissal of Muslims who have been allowed to deceptively infiltrate our government agencies, without your support she stands alone among the living dead in congress. And then please (if you haven’t already done so,) for your sake, and the sake of the future of your children and our Country, join Brigitte and me, in her organization of ACT for America and fight Islam now, while we still can without bloodshed, by clicking on the hyperlinks.

To order her riveting book “Because They Hate” about growing up in Lebanon in a Christian Democratic country, only to see it destroyed in exactly the same way Islam is incrementally and deceptively undermining the West and building a foundation of Islamic Shariah Ideology. The country may be different but the agenda is the same… click book here.

de Andréa

As well as contacting your own representatives--- Please send an email to Rep. Myrick ASAP, letting her know we’re all behind her. Click on this link to send her an email:

And if you are so inclined, call her Washington, D.C. office, 202/225-1976, and leave a message there letting Rep. Myrick know we’re supporting her efforts.

And it you are a member of ACT make sure you identify yourself as an ACT for America member when you email or call!

Thank you so very much! Brigitte

Monday, April 28, 2008

The Muslim Test

In case one is still wondering if there is really any such Muslim as a “Moderate Muslim”

By de Andréa

If you have been reading my passed articles about Islam and the Muslim agenda of world domination and conquest, then you know that I do not believe that there is any such Muslim as a moderate, warm fuzzy, or middle of the road Muslim. Therefore I don’t believe there is any such Muslim as a radical Muslim either. One is either a Muslim or one is not.

What is a moderate Buddhist? What is a moderate Hindu, or a moderate Nazi, or a moderate Jew or a moderate Christian? Is it one who doesn’t follow the teachings of its respective “holy-book”? Is it one who does not subscribe to the direction of its respective “god’? Is it one who does not identify or live according to their religion? Yes you say??? Then one is not a member of that religious group, period…

A moderate Muslim would have to be one that did not believe in the Quran and did not follow the teachings of Allah their god. You see Islam, unlike Judaism and Christianity has never gone through a reformation. So if one is a Muslim then one must cling to the original teachings of the Quran and the Hadith as written by Muhammad in 610 AD, 1398 years ago.

Instead of our settling for tepid, generic “condemnations” of terrorism by Muslims and Muslim organizations that purport to be “mainstream” and “moderate,” it would be more appropriate to see just how such so-called moderate warm-fuzzy Muslims respond to the questions contained in the Qu’ranic Muslim test.

Granted, thanks to the doctrine of Taqiyyah (true lies) taught in the Quran, one can never be sure if the Muslim respondent is telling the truth or being deceptive in order to advance the cause of Islam. But it is my opinion that generic denunciations of terrorism are virtually meaningless and therefore meritless and contradictory so long as the person issuing such denunciations holds to underlying Islamic principles.

But if a Muslim says he is a Muslim but does not subscribe to violent Terrorist Jihad in any way, or any teaching that is found in the Quran, then your friendly warm-fuzzy Moderate Muslim is lying. It’s called Taqiyyah (true lies) a supernatural deception that is taught by their god Allah in the Quran. Most are not even aware that they have been taught Taqiyyah.

The following Questions are directly out of the Quran. If one is a Muslim, one must believe and adhere to Allah’s teachings as recorded by their prophet Muhammad. If not, one cannot be regarded as a Muslim anymore than a self-proclaimed Christian who does not believe in the teachings of the New Testament of the Bible can realistically call oneself a Christian.

Remember, these are questions to ask a Muslim who professes to oppose Jihad, terrorism and so-called radical Islam.

1 “Apostates”: Do you support killing them? Should leaving the faith of Islam be punishable by death?

2 “Beating Women”: Is beating women ever acceptable, and if not, do you reject those decrees of Islamic law that sanction the beating of women? Do you also accept stoning women to death for being raped of for committing adultery?

3 “Calling Jews pigs and monkeys”: Do you believe that Jews are in any way sub-human and if not, do you reject Quranic interpretations that claim they are?

4 “Declaring holy war”: Do you support declaring war against non-Muslims to subjugate them to Islam? Do you believe that it is fair and reasonable to offer Infidels (non-Muslims) three options: Conversion to Islam, Slavery and Paying the Jizya, or Death?

5 “Enslavement”: Do you support the enslavement of female war prisoners and having sex with them as concubines? If not, do you reject those interpretations in Islamic Law, for “Ma-Malkakat Aymanikum”, which justifies such actions?

6 “Fighting Jews”: Do you support perpetual war against Jews to exterminate them, and if not, should those Muslims who incite such war be punished?

7 “Gays”: Do you believe it is acceptable to kill gays, and if not, do you reject those edicts in Sharia Law which claim it is?

THE BOTTOM LINE: If the answers to these questions are yes then one is a Muslim. If any of the answers to these questions are yes, then one is a Muslim and if he says not, he is still your enemy. If all of the answers to these questions are truly no, then one is not a Muslim. As I said there is no such Muslim as a moderate or radical Muslim. One is either a Muslim or one is not. If he is a Muslim, he follows the teachings of the Quran…then one day, he will kill you, period.
de Andréa

Saturday, April 26, 2008

A Poem-- No God, No Guns

As much doom and gloom as I write about regarding the brainwashing of our children in public schools, I must confess there is at least one 15 year old that thinks for him or herself and honors God before all else.

de Andréa

The following is a poem, it is written by an anonymous 15 year old student in Phoenix Arizona, and sent to me by one of my readers whose name is Wayne: Since the name of “God” is mentioned in the “Pledge of Allegiance” and “The Lord's Prayer” they are not allowed in most public schools, so this kid in Arizona wrote a new school prayer:

Now I sit me down in school
Where praying is against the rule

For this great nation under God,
Finds mention of Him very odd.

If Scripture now the class recites,
it violates the Bill of Rights.

And anytime my head I bow
becomes a Federal matter now.

Our hair can be purple, orange, or green,
that’s no offense; it's a freedom scene.

The law is specific, the law is precise.
Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice.

For praying in a public hall,
might offend someone with no faith at all.

In silence alone we must meditate,
God's name is prohibited by the state.

We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
and pierce our noses, tongues, and cheeks.

They've outlawed guns, but first the Bible,
to quote the Good Book makes me liable.

We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen,
and the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.

But it's 'inappropriate' to teach right from wrong,
we’re taught that such 'judgments' do not belong.

We can get our condoms and birth controls,
study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles.

But the Ten Commandments are not allowed.
No word of God must reach this crowd.

It is scary here I must confess,
when chaos reigns the school's a mess.

So, Lord, this silent plea I make:
Should I be shot; my soul please take!


THE BOTTOM LINE: What an awesome kid…

While this poem says an awful lot, about the hypocrisy of our government public schools, regarding what is allowed and what is not.
As well as a philosophy gone awry there is one very special fear, that I see appear, and maybe only I took notice of this caveat.

It shows up on the very last line, where it says “Should I be shot, my soul please take". And just before, it says: “So Lord, this silent plea I make.
It indicates a feeling of expectation, even in a zone that is Gun free. To be shot in place as that, could it be, no... not unless it is for Jesus sake.


de Andréa

Friday, April 25, 2008

First Amendment Rights

If you are a Christian or a Jew, you have no First Amendment rights in America. Why? Because you are the people of the book, the Quran says so, and Islam forbids any religion but Islam, and any law but Shariah

By de Andréa

If you don’t believe that Islamic Shariah law already takes precedence over our own American Constitutional law, then you are not paying attention to what is going on in your child’s public school.

In public schools across America at least for the time being, it is acceptable to practice Buddhism, Shintoism, Scientology, Hinduism, Islam, and Sorcery, but if you dare to show your Christian face you are at least reprimanded or worse, eventually however only the religion of Islam will be tolerated. This after all is what tolerance means to Islam.

The rights of Christian Americans are under attack, not again, but still! Consider what has happened just in this past week: A teacher, a coach, and a student have had religious freedoms stripped away. In New Jersey, East Brunswick High School officials told football coach Marcus Borden he cannot kneel and bow his head while members of his team have a voluntary student-led pre-game prayer read the story

In Wisconsin’s Tomah Area School District, a teacher refused to give a student identified only as A.T. a grade on an art project because his work included "John 3:16" as well as "A sign of love.” However, Buddha, Hindus and sorcerers are considered “approved” forms of art by the school read the story.

In Mt. Vernon, Ohio, school leaders told teacher John Freshwater he must put his Bible out of sight when students are in his room. Mr. Freshwater has refused to do so. He has had a Bible on his desk for the past 18 years read the story.

Not our religious freedoms, but our Christian freedoms are slowly being taken away, mainly because Christians have not taken a stand! People of the Christian or Jewish faith (in the Quran they are referred to as the people of the book) are being forced to remain silent and discriminated against, while other religions are accepted in the name of “tolerance.”

In Grove Heights Minnesota there is a public school that is an example of the future of the American public school system, it is taught by Muslim madrassas, because it is an American Islamic Public school, that’s right, an Islamic public school. Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TIZA), a K-8 is a charter school in Inver Grove Heights Minnesota. Charter schools are public schools and by law must not endorse or promote any religion. TIZA however is an Islamic Public School, funded by Minnesota taxpayers read the story.

These are but a few of the thousands of examples of how “Fundamental Islamic Shariah law” has already infiltrated America. They have taken over our colleges our primary schools getting text books (read the story) approved that indoctrinate children with Islamic ideology. College academics teach Islamic theocracy and oppose American liberty.

They have even infiltrated our private Christian Colleges, Georgetown University in Washington DC for example, which boasts a tradition of more than 200 years of Jesuit and Catholic teachings, last year sent letters to half a dozen Christian organizations telling them they no longer are welcome, they have been replaced by Wahhabist Muslin groups read the story.

New York public school KHALIL GIBRAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY an Islamic Jihad-themed school blasted for misappropriating the name. The FGC says NYC officials are misusing the legacy of the Christian Lebanese-poet, Khalil Gibran is a taxpayer supported public Islamic school read the story. There---that is seven stories for you to read, I have about a thousand more, if you want to read them let me know. Example—there are more that 600 public schools in California alone that teach Islamic ideology and Sharia laws.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one will take the time to do a little research, it becomes blatantly apparent that the infiltration of American culture by Islam is moving so rapidly now, that it is difficult to keep up with. The reason that this is not found on the front page of the NY Times or on the alphabet soup media is because it would not be politically, or multiculturally tolerant or correct, which shows one just how far reaching the infiltration of Islamic control has already gone. The replacement of our culture, systems, and traditions by Shariah law and Islamic ideology has now become so common place that for the most part, it simply goes unnoticed.

The incremental infiltration of Islam into our schools and Government is fundamental and foundational. It is building the stage for a future performance of a complete replacement of the American culture and philosophy with the oppressive theocracy of Islam. The most dangerous part of this process is that it goes unnoticed. Moreover when people begin to recognize that they are losing their country, it is too late, and then the only way to save ones freedom, is to fight the Jihad in the streets of America. Check out Paul Sperry’s book “infiltration” Paul says the infiltration of Islam in America has been going on for 30 years. Did you know that? 30 years ago I didn’t. But you see this is my point, 30 years later; we still don’t know, we don’t know that it is going on right in front of our deceived blind eyes.

Ever hear of the snowball effect? It suddenly gets big…real fast.

de Andréa

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Islamic Sharia Law at Harvard

While Americans have gone into hibernation and are lulled into complacency as the threat of Islamic Sharia law becomes a reality, the kettle that slowly boils the frog to death is continuing to heat up around us.

de Andréa

A metaphor for incrementalismIf you would take a frog, put it in a kettle of cold water, the frog will slowly slip into the trance of hibernation, and then if you gradually raise the temperature, the frog will, without thinking and without awareness, adjust to the temperature changes until it boils to death.

The kettle of Islam is heating up around us, it is defined as “cultural jihad” or “civilization jihad,” moreover what is unknown to most Americans, is that it includes the total abolition of our culture and the advancement of Islamic Sharia law.

My thanks to each and every one of you that has joined Brigitte and I in ACT FOR AMERICA to “wake up the frog” that is America, before the water reaches the boiling point and it’s too late to turn back.

The following very well written article, by Hillel Stavis of Front page News is telling of what is boiling in our college campuses today. From my experience this is rapidly becoming the standard in Middle Eastern studies in the world of academics.

Remember these indoctrinated students, are the future of America…

Shilling for Sharia at Harvard
By Hillel Stavis

Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman touched off a fierce debate when he recently wrote in The New York Times Magazine that Islamic Sharia law represents the highest state of “the rule of law.” But what many of Feldman’s critics did not recognize is that his argument has been building over several years.

Just as an old photographic print slowly becomes visible when immersed in developing solution, Noah’s claims about the alleged virtues of Sharia first surfaced in his 2005 book, Divided by God written when he was still a professor at NYU. Three years later, Feldman, who helped draft the Iraqi constitution, has turned his argument into a new book, called The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. The book marks Feldman’s emergence as a leading academic advocate for Sharia law.

If this seems like a bizarre role for someone who attended the Orthodox Maimonides School near Boston, it is in line with the career trajectory of a very bright young man who wants to be preeminent among the severely compromised academics inhabiting the Middle East Studies Association. Thus, one week after his article, “Why Sharia?” was featured in the Times’ magazine, Feldman presented his position at Harvard’s “Interfaculty Initiative on Contemporary State and Society in the Islamic World.” The initiative previously had featured UCLA’s Khaled Abou el Fadl, who set the tone for the series with his opening statement that “Whether Sharia complies – or does not comply – with fundamental human rights is vacuous and irrelevant.” So much for a thousand years of western humanist thought and liberal jurisprudence.

What made Feldman’s lecture different from his magazine piece was what he left out of the latter. Obviously, any discussion of Sharia must include what informs the law at its heart – The Koran, Sunna and, to a lesser extent, Sira. Writing for the Times, he at least traced the roots of Sharia to the Koran. But that was as far as he would go. At Harvard, his analysis of Sharia was limited to “the rule of law” as interpreted by “scholars” producing an Islamic “constitution,” all of which is refined and perfected by a “balance of power” between rulers and scholars.

In Feldman’s revisionist account, the evolution of Islamic law echoes the Western experience and is compatible with it. To Feldman, Sharia evolves from “higher law” to “the rule of law” in a neat conflation of the secular with the holy that places the Islamic code alongside the West’s rigorously evolved concept of secular justice. Feldman suggests that the dreaded huddud laws of amputation and other draconian penalties for apostasy and blasphemy are mere “worldly commands,” notwithstanding the fact that they are drawn directly from the Koran. For example, Sura 5:33 prescribes amputation of limbs “on opposite sides,” a dreadful penalty that has found new life in some of the Sharia ruled lands today. Indeed, the fundamental nature of Sharia law is inextricably connected to divine revelation, a concept with which the West did away centuries ago. The fact that a Nigerian woman, Amina Lawal, was recently spared the Hadithic-inspired penalty of being stoned to death for adultery, had more to do with international outrage and pressure than any “nuanced” application of traditional Sharia law.

All this was utterly missing from Feldman’s lecture. There was much else, too, that the professor obscured. For example, Feldman cited the 11th century Baghdad jurist, al-Mawardi, as a shining example of the purity of Sharia in the face of the abuse of secular rulers. A pity Professor Feldman failed to note that the medieval Basra scholar was a staunch proponent of jihad war and violent imposition of Sharia law as it applied to dhimmahs, that is, Christians and Jews. Al-Mawardi writes in his epic Laws of Islamic Governance of the jizhya or compulsory poll tax levied on dhimmahs, “Payment is made immediately and is treated like booty. It does, however, not prevent a jihad being carried out against them in the future.”

Similarly passed over by Feldman were some telling observations on Sharia by one of Professor Feldman’s favorite historians of Islam, Sir Hamilton Gibb: “The evidence of two women is reckoned as equal only to that of one man; that of non-Moslems against Moslems is occasionally, but grudgingly admitted, and on serious charges not admitted at all.” (italics added) “…the Muslim murderer of a dhimmah does not suffer the death penalty; a dhimmah man may not marry a Moslem woman, whereas a Moslem man may marry a dhimmah woman. In the second place, dhimmahs are obliged to wear distinctive clothes so that they may not be confused with true believers [ i.e., Muslims], and are forbidden to ride horses, or carry arms. Finally, though their churches may be, and in practice frequently have been, converted into mosques, they are not to build new ones. The most they may due is repair those that have fallen into decay.”

We find no reference whatsoever, in either Professor Feldman’s New York Times article or in his recent lecture, to Sharia and its impact on non-Muslims, whether they be dhimmahs or idolaters (those that “associate” other gods with Allah – mushrikun). The body count and the divinely inspired discriminatory laws resulting from the Muslim conquests of the 7th century up to the present belie Feldman’s grandiose apologetic that “…Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world.”

Indeed, even a critic sympathetic to Islam, Alan Wolfe of Boston College, recognizes Feldman’s intent. He writes, “The problem with Feldman's compromise lies elsewhere. Offered as a non-biased solution to church-state conflicts, Feldman's proposal, like separation of church and state itself, is biased against some religions and in favor of others.” You guess which religion Feldman favors. And it can only be a matter of time before the professor, having asserted that Sharia law is desirable, will assure us that its introduction in the United States is inevitable.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One can track the progress of the incremental death of America and the subsequent resurrection of the world agenda of Islam by comparing the Islamic influence on our culture with that of Europe, more specifically that of The U.K. Professor Feldman’s last statement of the desirability of Sharia law in the U.S. is nothing short of terrifying. Especially in light of the recent similar statement made by the Arch Bishop of Canterbury in the Church of England where he said on February 11, 2008 that “the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is unavoidable and that it would help introduce social cohesion” There is no doubt, that we are rapidly catching up to the demise of the United Kingdom…
de Andréa

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The Hillary Connection

So you thought only Obama had connections to militant Islamic terrorists. No, it just may be the whole far left of the Democrat party that is connected to terrorism and the overthrow of Free America

By de Andréa

After all of Hillary’s garbage cans that have been gone through, one would think that everything in her past would have by now been brought to light. Oh, contraire my friend. There is yet another of her many skeletons yet to be exhumed. And this is her close ties and support of known terrorists, sympathizers, and Hamas supporters that are still hid from the public view.

Hillary Clinton’s connection with terrorists began in the 1980s when she served on the board of the subversive New World Foundation, which collected funds for the Palestine Liberation Organization, (PLO) at a time when Arafat’s PLO was officially recognized by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization.

In 1996, the first lady (Hilrod as she now calls herself) initiated an outreach program to bring Muslim terrorists to the White House. But, as terrorism expert Steve Emerson noted in The Wall Street Journal all of the leaders with whom Mrs. Clinton elected to meet came from Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organizations, which because of her passed anti- Americanism, Hillary has been known to embrace.

All of the groups Mrs. Clinton supports show unambiguously that they have long advocated or justified violent Jihad. By meeting with these groups, the first lady lent them legitimacy as ‘mainstream’ and ‘moderate.

Among these radical groups are the AMA, no, not the American Medical Association, the American Muslim Alliance (AMA) and the terrorists support group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), both groups that support Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida etc attended a White House reception hosted by Hillary in February, 1996.

These organization also have political and financial ties to the Brotherhood and the Holyland Foundation that have been initiated for charity funds going to support terrorism both here in the U.S. and in the Middle East.

Steve Emerson says that the leaders of these organizations “have all sanctioned terrorism, published anti-Semitic statements, and repeatedly hosted conferences that were forums for denunciations of Jews and exhortations to wage jihad.”

The American Muslim Alliance was headed in the '90s by terrorist leader Abdulrahman Alamoudi who met with Clinton and Gore in 1995. Emerson notes that “Mrs. Clinton [allowed] the American Muslim Alliance to draw up the Muslim guest list for the first lady’s . . . White House reception.”

Alamoudi, was the primary defender of Musa Abu Marzug, the Hamas political bureau chief responsible for creating the group’s death squads, Marzug took “credit” when Hamas brigades sprayed machine gun fire into a crowded Jerusalem mall. But less than three days after Marzug was arrested by the FBI in July of 1995, Alamoudi said that Marzug “had never been involved in terrorism” and called his arrest “an insult to the Muslim community. He “elicited contributions fro Marzug’s defense fund” and called him a “political prisoner.”

Then, Hillary ran for Senate and suddenly it was payback time. On June 13, 2000, the American Muslim Alliance’s Massachusetts Chapter held a very successful fundraiser and raised $50,000 for her candidacy. Tahir Ali, the chairman of the chapter, said “we must support all who have Islam’s interests at heart.”

The Palestinian terrorists know that Hillary supports their point of view. reported on Oct. 7, 2007, that leading terrorists have publicly called for her election. Aaron Klein, WorldNet Daily’s Jerusalem correspondent, wrote, in his wonderful book "Schmoozing with Terrorists," Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terrorist group said “I hope Hillary is elected in order to have the occasion to carry out all the promises she is giving regarding Iraq.”

Senakreh has high hopes for a Hillary presidency. He told Klein “I hope also that she will maintain her husband’s policies regarding Palestine and even develop that policy."
Abu Hamed, leader of the Al Aqsa Brigades in Gaza, noting that “the Iraqi resistance is succeeding,” said that “Hillary and the Democrats call for withdrawal.” Then he added, helpfully, “Her popularity shows that the resistance is winning and that the occupation is losing. We just hope that she will go until the end and change American policy. President Clinton wanted to give the Palestinians 98 percent of the West Bank territories. I hope Hillary will move a step forward and give the Palestinians all their rights.”

THE BOTTOM LINE : With Hillary’s connection with the enemy, and the statements of terrorists that they are hoping for her to win, do we really want a terrorist supporter in the most powerful chair in the world?

de Andréa

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Obama's Defense, a lie

You have been deceived…

By de Andréa

Barack Obama’s defense of his longtime minister Jeremiah A. Wright Jr’s denunciations of America by saying that for blacks of his generation, memories of “humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away” is a lie.

An examination of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s background reveals that Obama’s characterization of his upbringing is simply not true.

Obama may just be excavating a much larger hole than he has already made for himself. It turns out that Rev. Wright had a pampered childhood, born with a silver spoon in his mouth now may have stuck his proverbial foot in it instead.

Described by Obama as his sounding board and mentor for more than two decades, Wright was born in Philadelphia in 1941. He lived in a racially mixed section called Germantown, which consisted of homes on broad tree-lined streets in northwest Philadelphia. The owners then were all middle to upper-class families.

For 62 years, Wright’s father, the Rev. Jeremiah Alvesta Wright, was pastor at Grace Baptist Church of Germantown. He was one of the first blacks to receive a degree from the Lutheran Theological Seminary in Philadelphia.

Wright’s mother, Mary Elizabeth Henderson Wright, was a schoolteacher. She was the first black to teach an academic subject at Roosevelt Junior High, the first to teach at Germantown High, and the first to teach at the Philadelphia High School for Girls. She became vice principal of Girls High in 1968.

Rather than attend the more racially mixed Germantown High School at 40 East High St., Wright traveled a few miles to the elite Central High School at 1700 West Olney Ave., graduating in 1959. Opened in 1838, Central High has a distinguished past and admits only highly-qualified applicants who are privileged to attend from all over the city. It is comparable to the Bronx High School of Science and Boston Latin School, both public schools known for academic excellence.

When Wright attended Central High, the student body was 90 percent white, according to students who attended around the same time. At least three-quarters of the students were Jewish. Former students of the period say racial tension did not exist.

Bill Cosby, who attended the school until transferring to Germantown High, has referred to Central as a “wonderful” school. In contrast to Wright, Cosby has denounced blacks who take refuge in self-pitying victim-hood and seek to blame whites for problems in the black community.

“Central High was a marvelous academic environment,” says Tod Mammuth, who graduated in 1965 and is now a Philadelphia-area lawyer. “You had to have high academic credentials to be accepted and a high IQ score. Many said it was more rigorous than college. We had no racial friction.”

In college, “I was so far advanced from the normal kids, it was almost unbelievable,” says H. Yale Gutnick, who graduated from Central High in 1960 and is a Pittsburgh lawyer. “In my freshman year, I didn’t have to do anything. I had already read most of what we had to read in English class, and I was equally advanced in the other academic areas.”

In contrast to Wright’s comfortable upbringing, Morton A. Klein, who also attended Central High around the same time, lived in a poor, virtually all-black section called West Oak Lane. “Four times a year, we would go to get big boxes of used clothing that was our wardrobe for the year. I never resented it. I was thrilled with my clothes,” says Klein, who was an economist in the Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations and is now president of the Zionist Organization of America. “We never went out to eat,” says Klein. “We had no car. We did not go to summer camp or take vacations. I had dozens of black friends. We played in the street every day. I remember my childhood as wonderful, and it certainly did not breed hatred of America. I love America.”

In contrast, the man Obama describes as being like an uncle has blamed America and whites for starting the AIDS virus to kill off blacks, training professional killers, importing drugs, and creating a racist society to oppress blacks. “The government gives those drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law, and then wants to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, not ‘God Bless America’ —“ God damn America,” Wright has said.

In his speech on race, Obama sought to evoke sympathy for Wright. He described a “lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family...”

Obama said this was “the reality in which Rev. Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted....Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Rev. Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years.” All this from a man that had a gold plated upbringing better that the average American.

In retirement, Wright will continue a life of privilege that dates back to Central High. As a retirement gift, Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ is building him a million-dollar home abutting Odyssey Country Club and Golf Course in the nearly all-white Chicago suburb of Tinley Park. The home sits on land the pastor purchased in 2004 for $345,000. In December 2006, Wright sold the land to his church, which took out a $1.6 million mortgage on the property. In April 2007, the church applied for a building permit for the brick and stone structure.

Wright’s new home has 10,340 square feet of space, about four times the size of a typical suburban house. It includes four bedrooms, an elevator, an exercise room, and a four-car garage.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So it seems that rather than being a victim of the poor oppression of blacks, as Obama has claimed, Wright is instead, the symbol of the American dream. Rather than meriting sympathy, Wright exemplifies what should be described as black leaders who orchestrate support for themselves by manipulating blacks into seeing themselves as victims, creating a black “culture of failure.” A sharp contrast to Bill Cosby who wasn’t near as privileged as Wright, and yet seems to have been blessed with the gift of exhortation, revealing a spirit of encouragement, rather than Wright’s hateful demeanor.

Obama’s attempt to excuse Wright’s hate-America rhetoric by deceptively describing his personal history and his failure to condemn him as a bigot, speak volumes about the candidate’s own character and fitness to lead this country.

This type of behavior and deception is indicative of the ideology of Islam, a learned Qu’ranic philosophy. If it walks and talks like a duck…

At the very least, it should causes one to wonder…

de Andréa

Monday, April 21, 2008

U.S. Intelligence

Understanding Islamist Ideology is the Key to Winning the So-called War on Terror

By de Andréa

American outreach efforts with the Muslim world have been nothing short of a disaster, because we continue seeking partners among those who foster anti-American sentiment and who facilitate, rather than rebuke the agenda of Islamist ideology.

If the disturbing intelligence estimates are true, the threat from a reconstituted al Qaeda is at its highest point since 2001. While U.S. military, intelligence, and law enforcement actions have combined to thwart al Qaeda, its safe haven in Pakistan's remote tribal areas has allowed the terrorist band to regroup with a new generation of battle-tested leaders.

The war on terror
Al Qaeda's attention increasingly is drawn to Europe, which has been the victim of terrorist attacks planned in the tribal areas that transcend the Afghan-Pakistan border, and is a much closer and accessible target of these terrorists than is the United States. In the past year, frightening plots in Spain, Germany, and Denmark, have been thwarted.

Last fall, officials arrested two German converts to Islam and a Turkish immigrant who allegedly were plotting bombing attacks at Ramstein Air Base and the Frankfurt International Airport. The suspects who trained at an al Qaeda-affiliated camp in Pakistan, were found with enough explosives to make bombs bigger than those used in the London transit bombings and the 2003 attack in Madrid.

Danish police arrested eight suspects last September for allegedly planning a terrorist attack and storing unstable explosives in a densely populated residential area of Copenhagen. The suspects were targeting the Nørreport train station, Denmark's busiest, which serves 300,000 people each day.

None of this should make us complacent in the hope that al Qaeda has taken its sights off of America. A robust and successful counter-terrorist policy made up of intelligence gathered by the FBI, asset forfeitures, and designations by the Department of the Treasury, and other work by the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies within the intelligence community have combined to keep us at least temporarily safe from another attack.

The war on Ideology
Al Qaeda and Hammas are clearly the most significant operational terrorist threats to this country, but they must be seen in the context of what drives them – a demonic extremist ideology with the agenda of world conquest and oppression. This was the agenda of Islam in the first millennium AD and is still the agenda of Islam today -- The biggest flaw in this nation's national security policy is that it is focused specifically on countering acts of terrorism and not countering Islam’s worldwide oppressive ideology that has spawned al Qaeda, Hamas, Wahhabism, Salafi, Mujahideen, Hezbollah, Islamic-Jihad, etcetera. While a few in government may even be cognizant of this much, there are still dangerous limitations to their basic comprehension of Islam.

Even the most Informed, fall just short of recognizing what Islam is and always has been, which is an all encompassing religious theocracy that is demonically driven to bring all the worlds people under the domination of Islam, and only then, according to the Quran there will be peace. This is where the deceptive religion of peace comes from, a world at peace under the control of the Islamic rule of Sharia law.

That is why I am critical of Karen Hughes, former Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. During her tenure, the U.S. government chose to embrace the very people who foment and foster terrorism and high levels of anti-American sentiment all over the world. Hughes and her staff held meetings with the very people who should be avoided and denounced for their public, anti-American and pro-terrorist stances; she embraced individuals and groups with long histories of support for terrorists and sought advice from individuals who are on record as being supportive and friendly with terrorists and terrorist causes.

This, and the following, exemplifies the benevolent nature of the western culture in its quest for good in the midst of all the bad, the continuous pursuit of a diamond in the rough, hoping against hope that there must be some Muslims that aren’t too Islamic.-- Muslims that do not subscribe to the conversion or murder of infidels, or the practice of Sharia law, or those bent on accomplishing the agenda dictated in the Quran of world domination and the ultimate goal of restoring the 12th Caliphate to rule the world. The sad truth here is that this description of the ideal western Muslim is a Muslim that exists only through Western Eyes. If such a Muslim were actually to exist, he would quite simply not be a Muslim. We are in fact chasing our tail here.

For example, the recent decision to appoint an American observer to the Organization on the Islamic Conference (OIC), a group with a history of support for terrorist organizations and the causes championed by terrorists, rather than denounce the OIC for what it is, is extremely dangerous. Under Karen Hughes, the State Department has met with leaders of various Muslim Brotherhood-front organizations in the United States, including the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), currently an unindicted co-conspirator in a major Hamas fundraising case in Dallas. ISNA publications have consistently supported Hamas including top Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzook.

The State Department is hardly alone. The Department of Justice also has worked with ISNA, even as it labels ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator in an ongoing Hamas-financing case in Dallas, and as evidence in that case shows ISNA is part of the Terrorist Egyptian based Muslim Brotherhood. The Department of Homeland Security had an information table at ISNA's fall convention, set up adjacent to the radical Islamist organization Hizb ut-Tahrir, which seeks to reestablish the 12th Caliphate of the Umma, (the leader of the World Nation of Islam)..

The Brotherhood should be seen as anything but a potential partner. It should be designated from a counterintelligence point-of-view as a foreign power, an enemy, and a threat to the national security of the United States. The Muslim Brotherhood has stated clearly that it considers the United States to be its enemy, despite the deceptive claims by some that there exists a moderate wing of the movement that somehow does not support the movement's core goals, agenda, and ideology of Islam.

The U.S. government’s quest and the State Departments in particular, to seek out moderates in the Arab and Muslim world is an exercise in futility. What we have done is simply embrace and promote those who claim to speak for all Muslims, but parrot the themes of anti-Americanism, victimology, and grievances that seek to place the blame for all the world's ills on U.S. foreign policy.

Organizations, individuals and institutions in the Muslim world are reflexively anti-American and pro-terrorist, or, at minimum, apologists for terrorism. They should be denounced and driven off of American soil. All organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood need to be treated for what they are: fascistic, paternalistic organizations that seek to destroy the West and facilitate the return of the Caliphate.

Congress should require the lead agencies and departments in the so-called Global War on Terrorism (most notably the FBI, CIA, and DHS) to fully and formally educate all counterterrorism personnel in the proclaimed Islamist ideology of the Nation of Islam, and the global Islamist tyrannical movement. This ideology is easily accessible in the Quran and Islamic religious texts and treatises such as Sayyid Qutb's Milestones. This has not been instituted at any agency in the more than six years after 9/11, this is inexcusable.

Instead, U.S. actions have been counterproductive, empowering Islam at a time when it could have challenged its ideology and the terrorist groups that it has spawned. Contact with government agencies effectively anoints the groups as enablers of the Muslim-American community to introduce Sharia law, change the culture of a liberated and free America to be replaced by the oppressive theocracy of Islam. This policy, which continues to this day despite the criminal connections of many of these organizations, can only end in disaster for the interest of the United States both domestically and abroad.

When pondering this matter, it is important and instructive to consider the Danish cartoons controversy. With the exception of a handful of courageous news outlets, the American media refused to republish the cartoons, claiming that "respect for religious values" overrode the principle of free speech. For everyone else, free speech, the bedrock of western civilization, was suddenly thrown out the window at the first sign that many in the Muslim world were offended and retaliatory violence was possible. The U.S. State Department denounced the publication of the cartoons as "unacceptable speech," hate crimes if you will.

This censorship and intimidation continues each day in a disturbingly growing volume. Critics of Islamism and extremism who have written books, or as yours truly, spoken out, or published cartoons deemed "offensive" to Islam, have had their lives permanently changed – facing death threats and being forced underground or behind the protection of 24-hour security details. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the former Dutch parliamentarian and a friend of Theo Van Gogh (the Dutch filmmaker murdered for producing a film deemed "offensive" to Islam) has been forced to live under 24-hour protection and in hiding in her homeland and in the United States where she stayed for a year. Geert Wilders, another Dutch parliamentarian, produced a short film called "Fitna" that included images of the Quran being burned and has called for the banning of the Quran. For this admittedly offensive to some, but protected, transgression, Mr. Wilders has had to live in hiding under around the clock protection. His film was blocked by various websites, although anti-Christian and anti-Semitic films can be seen on YouTube and thousands of other sites routed through servers in the United States and Europe.

Canadian writer Irshad Manji has received death threats for her criticism of Islamic terrorism and discussion of Islamic reformation. More recently, Syrian-born American psychiatrist Wafa Sultan has been forced into hiding after an appearance on Al Jazeera prompted a condemnation from Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Sultan generated ire by condemning violence tolerated and sanctioned by some Islamic scholars in debates on Al Jazeera. Qaradawi said Sultan "has insulted Islam.” Subsequently, an Arabic newspaper published an advertisement sponsored by a group called "The Messenger of Allah Unites Us."

Islamist grievances such as these are not valid. Other "grievances" include Israel's existence, the so called separation of church and state (which seems only to apply to Christians anyway), secularism, pluralism, the absence of Islamic hegemony, the classification of Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups, and any perceived "insult" against Islam.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Unless we are prepared to accept severe restrictions on free speech, legitimize terrorist groups, allow the introduction of Islamic law in the U.S., prohibit any criticism of Islam, and propose the destruction of Israel, or basically give-up our freedom to the theocracy of Islamic ideology, nothing we do will ever satisfy the ‘grievances' of the Islamic believers. And unless we recognize that the threat of terrorism cannot be decoupled from the larger Islamic threat, a counter-terrorist focus on al Qaeda or looking for a moderate Muslim in the Islam camp, it is only destined to fail…

de Andréa

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Children are Always the Victims

Reminiscent of Waco, America experiences yet another “Jack Booted” attack on children all in the name of “Child Protection

By de Andréa

Another sad case of children caught up in a tornado of what we have come to call justice. One can only hope that this doesn’t turn out to be indicative of what our justice system has been morphed into, to create yet another blemish on American history.

In the case of the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints (FLDS) alleged child abuse matter, I at least at this point tend to fall onto the church’s side in the so-called separation of church and state. If the children were not the victims of abuse by their parents they now for sure are victims of abuse by the State Child Protection Services (CPS)

We should keep in mind that the allegations against the FLDS remain speculative and unproven, yet the government police state nanny’s, rushed in and disrupted whole families on the basis of a single phone call from a teenager who, if she even exists, can’t be found.

I any case, the state is ill-equipped to deal with 400-plus youngsters that it has torn from the bosoms of their mothers in the guise of protecting them from alleged abuses.

It’s obvious that the government, which is great at starting wars and taxing the citizenry to pay for some of the worst hare-brained schemes imaginable, hasn’t got the slightest idea of how to raise children. They know how to take children from their homes but they don’t know how to raise them once they’ve got them in their hands. Yet the idea that the government is better equipped than parents to raise children is widespread among the hate America liberals who lust after inserting the power of the state into the very heart of the American family.

The reality is that when you take children from their mothers and put them in the hands of the state or its subordinate agents, you ultimately do more damage to them than almost any abuse they might have suffered at home. Children who are wards of the state inherently end up on drugs, in prison or dead before they even reach adulthood.

These children should be with their mothers, who may be as much a victim as their children are alleged to be. Splitting them up from their mother and their siblings is not going to be performing a service to these kids. Just because we don’t agree with their lifestyle, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the State can do a better job than the mothers can do in raising them.

We should bear in mind that the allegations against the FLDS remain speculative and unproven, yet the government has already rushed in and disrupted whole families on the basis of a single phone call from a teenager who, if she even exists, can’t be found.

Lest we forget we have been through all of this kind of thing before. In the McMartin pre-school case during the 1980s, California government agencies acted on rumors that turned out to be absolutely false. As Doug Linder wrote in 2003, the resulting McMartin preschool abuse trial, which he called “the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history,” created a seven-year, $15 million investigation that led to not a single conviction. “More seriously, the McMartin case left in its wake hundreds of emotionally damaged children, as well as ruined careers for members of the McMartin staff,” Linder recalled.

I’m not saying that the FLDS case is a replay of that notorious miscarriage of justice, but we surely must keep in mind the lessons it taught us about rushing to judgment and endangering the welfare of children before the real facts are known.

Finally, we should be thankful that it is not Bill Clinton’s Attorney General Janet Reno running this operation against the FLDS Waco-style. If she were, by now the moms and their children would probably all be charred bodies in the smoking ruins of their compound.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The FLDS has been in that same location, living the same life style for many years and yet all those years they have robbed no banks, sold, grown, or used no drugs, none of them have ever been arrested for vandalism or even for graffiti tagging. One would have to assume that they have done something right

In any case what ever happened to investigation to determine if a crime has even been committed before we sent in S.W.A.T. to round up all the usual suspects? And then we could arrest just those who have actually committed a crime. What a novel idea! It is likely the children are not the criminals in this case, and their mother’s crime may at worst have been that of an enabler. And yet the children have been arrested and the mothers are victims of the State. All in the name of protection…

de Andréa

Friday, April 18, 2008

Strike on Iran, Eminent

Between May 1st and June 30th 2008 the U.S. may strike Iran’s nuclear facilities.

By de Andréa

We should look at Dick Cheney’s recent trip through the Middle East as possible preparation for a U.S. attack on Iran. Cheney’s hastily arranged 9-day visit to the region, which began in the middle of March, included stops in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Turkey, and the Palestinian territories.

The entire Middle East is gearing up for war, from Pakistan to Egypt; it is difficult to say who will be on whose side; most, will likely retaliate against anyone that is a threat. Israel is preparing for heavy casualties, suggesting that although Israel will not necessarily take part in the first strike, it is expecting to be the target of Iranian retribution.

Netanyahu Warns World of a Nuclear Iran
While Israel was recently conducting the largest home-front military exercises in its history, Israel’s National Infrastructure Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer warned Tehran about attacks on the Jewish state. “An Iranian attack will prompt a severe reaction from Israel, which will destroy the Iranian nation,” he said. He predicted that “in a future war, hundreds of missiles will rain on Israel,” but added that “Iran is definitely aware of our strength.”

In addition to the long-range missiles that Iran has been developing to strike Israel, Israel’s military strategists see the Iranians using Iranian backed terror groups like Hamas operating from Palestine and Hezbollah from Lebanon to launch attacks against Israel. According to the Washington Post, Iran has supplied Hezbollah with an arsenal that now contains “tens of thousands of missiles.”

Israel’s recent war exercises, including preparations for chemical and biological weapons attacks, drew a sharp response from Syria which held its own military drills. The Syrian government accused Israel of preparing for a war which Damascus predicted would be begin anytime between May 1 and the end of June.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently told foreign journalists that Israel needs to confront the threat posed by Iran. Privately he has been telling associates his number one priority is have the Israeli military strike Iran if the U.S. is unwillingto do so.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz disclosed that Israeli Mossad believes that North Korea has transferred technology and nuclear materials to Iran to aid Tehran’s secret nuclear weapons program.

Iran remains intransigent to international pressure to offer full transparency relating to its nuclear program. According to an AP report, the head of Iran’s nuclear program “abruptly canceled a meeting with the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Sunday, dealing a blow to the U.N. monitor's efforts to investigate allegations that Iran is making nuclear arms.

A number of signs indicate that, contrary to the belief President Bush is a lame duck who will not act before he leaves office, the U.S. is poised to strike before Iran can acquire nuclear weapons and carry out the threat of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to “wipe Israel off the map”: According to intelligence sources, the administration now rejects the false and misleading National Intelligence Estimate report issued in December that asserted Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in late 2003.

The French daily Le Monde reported in March that newly surfaced documents show that Iran has continued developing nuclear weapons. In late 2006, U.S. intelligence reportedly intercepted a phone conversation in Iran’s Defense Ministry in which the nuclear weapons program was discussed.

The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Admiral William Fallon, resigned in March amid media reports that he broke with President Bush’s strategy on Iran and did not want to be in the chain of command when the order comes down from the President to launch a strike on the Islamic Republic. It is possible that Fallon’s departure signaled that the U.S. is preparing to attack Iran.

According to a Tehran-based Iranian news network, Press TV, Saudi Arabia is taking emergency steps in preparing to counter any “radioactive hazards” that may result from an American attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The Saudi newspaper Okaz disclosed that the Saudi government has approved nuclear fallout preparations, and the Iranian network reported that the approval came a day after Cheney met with the kingdom’s high-ranking officials, further stating that the U.S. “is now informing its Arab allies of a potential war.”

The American commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, has stepped up criticism of Iran, telling Congress last week that Iranian support for Shiite militias posed the most serious threat to Iraq’s stability. He told senators: “Iran has fueled the violence in a particularly damaging way.” Last week, the U.S. said Iran was providing insurgents with missiles that were killing Americans and hitting targets within the U.S. occupied Green Zone in Baghdad. Gen. Petraeus’s remarks to Congress could lay the groundwork for a U.S. attack on Iran.

***President Bush said in a speech at the White House on April 10 that Iran, along with al-Qaida, are “two of the greatest threats to America.” He said Iran “can live in peace with its neighbors,” or “continue to arm and train and fund illegal militant groups which are terrorizing the Iraqi people … If Iran makes the wrong choice, America will act to protect our interests and our troops and our Iraqi partners.” He later told ABC News that if Iran continues to help militants in Iraq, “then we’ll deal with them.” Members of Congress are said to have been briefed by the administration about the rising Iranian threat.

Iran did little to cool tensions when it announced that it had begun installing 6,000 new centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz. Centrifuges can enrich uranium to a low level to produce nuclear fuel or a high level for use in weapons. The announcement of the new centrifuges by President Ahmadinejad came on April 8, Iran’s National Day of Nuclear Technology, which marked the second anniversary of Iran’s first enrichment of uranium. Iran already has about 3,000 centrifuges operating in Natanz, and the new announcement was widely seen as a show of defiance to international demands to halt a nuclear program that the U.S. and its allies insist is aimed at building nuclear weapons for the expressed purpose of Attacking Israel and Western interests.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Is the U.S. just showing its teeth, or will it actually attack? That is the zillion dollar question.

A lot more rides on this threat than I believe the administration realizes. Muslims regard empty threats as a sure sign of weakness, moreover, I am not so sure that they are wrong in that assessment. We should have regarded the Iranian support of the Iraqi militia as an act of war against the U.S. along time ago. That failure to retaliate was already considered by Ahmadinejad as sign of weakness. The failure of the U.S. to recognize this cultural kink in the Muslim ideology is what likely fueled the desire of Iran to continue the pursuit of nuclear weapons in the first place. So if Bush’s pitch here is just another balk then we will have only done more to fuel the fire in the belly of Islam.

While Israel likely will not join the initial strike against Tehran, if Iran retaliates against Israel by dropping missiles in their front yard, Israel will not only return the favor but will likely annihilate Iran. If you live close by you may want to purchase a gas mask…

***It is ignorance that Bush does not consider Hamas right here in this country as one of the greatest threats to America.

de Andréa