Thursday, April 30, 2009

A Matter of Conscience

"The right of conscience” That right, the letter says, is codified in Iowa Code 146.1. "This right is based upon the simple truth that it is wrong to force anyone to violate his or her conscience."

”We enjoy the protections of this right guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa Constitutions. This right of conscience protects individuals against coercion by the state authority, and serves as the first line of defense against the cancer of tyranny."

By de Andréa
April 30, 2009

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is warning the county recorders' offices in his state that workers must process "marriage" licenses for same-sex duos or face possible charges in a court of law. "If necessary, we will explore legal actions to enforce and implement the court's ruling, working with the Iowa Dept. of Public Health and county attorneys" he warned on his website. Does anyone hear bells? This seems to have the ring of despotism.

But an announcement today from a statewide pro-family organization and a public interest law firm with a reach that goes around the world means the issue of same-sex weddings eventually could end up back in the Iowa state Supreme Court. The statements from Miller relate to the state Supreme Court's decision that Iowa must provide same-sex couples access to the state's marriage processes. Miller praised the decision as "clear and well-reasoned" and explained it is expected to take effect April 27.

In a series of messages on his website, he first "advised" recorders and registrars to provide "full access" to marriage. Then he instructed: "A county registrar should furnish the forms in the same manner as in opposite gender applications."

"The Supreme Court's decision … does change state law [Miller admitted]: the decision expressly strikes from Iowa Code chapter 595 the language which limits civil marriage to a man and a woman," he said. --- I am curious now --- since when, can a court change or make law? Every state constitution and the U.S. constitution clearly indicates that the only person or groups of persons that can make or change law are elected legislators. Is this one of the indicators of tyranny by the judicial system?

Then came the warning that "legal actions" could be pursued, “We must live by and follow what the courts decide," he said. This is one twisted Attorney General what happened to living by the law, and following what the law says?

A letter sent to county recorders by the Alliance Defense Fund says Miller is forgetting completely about "one of the most foundational rights and liberties we enjoy as Iowans and as Americans" … "the right of conscience."

That right, the letter says, is codified in Iowa Code 146.1. "This right is based upon the simple truth that it is wrong to force anyone to violate his or her conscience," said the letter.

Also the Iowa Family Policy Council cites the motto on the seal of the state, which reads, "Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain."

"This noble motto … is emblematic of the moral sentiments of Iowans from the banks of the Missouri to the waters of the Mighty Mississippi. … As citizens of the State of Iowa and thus, the United States, we enjoy the protections of this right guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa Constitutions. This right of conscience protects individuals against coercion by the state authority, and serves as the first line of defense against the cancer of tyranny."

The letter suggests counties adopt policies that ensure no one will be required to "issue or process a marriage license, or to perform, assist, or participate in such procedures, against that individual's religious beliefs or moral convictions." The suggested policy continues: "A person shall not discriminate against any individual in any way, including but not limited to employment, promotion, advancement, transfer, licensing, education, training, or the granting of employment privileges or conditions, because of the individual's participation in or refusal to participate in the issuance of a marriage license."

If Miller does not like that, the ADF "will defend this policy language and will provide free legal review and defense if this policy is challenged on the basis of its content.
This policy would protect objecting employees from being forced to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if doing so would violate the employee's conscience,” the ADF said.

Doug Napier, ADF senior legal counsel, said government employees who believe in marriage as the union of one man and one woman should not be penalized for abiding by their beliefs. "This policy allows an employee who does not wish to violate his or her own conscience by issuing a marriage license to a same-sex couple to abstain and allow the transaction to be performed by someone who is willing to do it," he said. "Forcing them to participate in offensive acts contrary to their deeply held beliefs in order to remain employed is unconstitutional”.

"Contrary to the threatening statement issued by Attorney General Tom Miller on April 21, the citizens of Iowa enjoy the protections of the right of conscience guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa constitutions – the very constitutions that county recorders swore to uphold when taking office," Napier said. "Mr. Miller conveniently omitted any discussion of their rights of conscience or the recorders' duty to protect the rights of their employees.

"This right of conscience protects individuals against heavy-handed coercion by the state, including the attorney general," he said.

Napier said the Iowa marriage law was settled and supported by Iowans, but then the court justices "stepped outside of [their] proper role of interpreting the law and has instead overruled the will of the people and created new law."

Miller, on his web page, affirmed that the justices were creating new law.
Napier said the solution would be for the state legislature to allow state residents to vote on the issue. The Iowa Family Policy Council already has begun work on that effort at a website promoting a marriage amendment.

A spokesman for the state organization said it had been contacted by a number of recorders or their employees expressing concern that the state's orders on a moral issue would violate their religious beliefs.

The same issue arose when a state court in California last year ruled there that county offices must issue same-sex "marriage" licenses. Several county officials were in the position of developing a challenge to the orders when voters took the issue in hand and in November overruled the court.

The voters in California embedded in their state constitution the definition of marriage limited to one man and one woman. In California then as in Iowa now, state officials rewrote state forms and procedures even though the legislators are the only agencies authorized to write law.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This kind of twisted manipulation and perversion of the legal and ‘judiciary system’ is a clear indication of the foundation of tyranny being constructed. Why does the legislature feel the need to write new law to override the law of the court which overrode the law of the legislature? Am I getting dizzy or what? This is what happens when we have a court system that has run a-muck, has become a loose cannon, and gone off the tracks. The separation of powers apparently no longer exists.

In California the people have a right by initiative to vote in law, which they did. The courts overruled it and the people had to vote for a new law to override the courts law, which they did. Now the people are waiting to see of the court will again make a new law to override the last law…

I think I’m getting dizzy again…

de Andréa

Monday, April 27, 2009

The Path of Greed Leads to Hell

Great Britain got what they asked for, MONEY and plenty of it. The problem is it comes with a price, a big price…They will owe their soul to Allah.

By de Andréa

Why is it that Great Britain is now faced with ‘Islamic Terrorism’ every where they turn? It is because they have exchanged ‘Parliamentary law’ for ‘Sharia law’. Britain now has 12 Shariah courts, publicly-funded Shariah Islamic education, welfare benefits for up to four wives for every Muslim man, legal honor killings, children falling off school rosters because they are being forced into child marriages, raging domestic violence and spousal abuse, and "no-go" zones where even British police are afraid to enter for fear of starting Islamic violent Jihad. Watch a video of Muslims chasing British police.

Watch a video of a similar demonstration in Fort Lauderdale Florida You will see the only real difference is in Florida the police are not running away. Not yet they aren’t. The Fort Lauderdale demonstration was just 2 months earlier in late 2008.

As I have frequently noted, Britain’s policy of politically correct multiculturalism, in other words the “outreach” to the Islamic community has failed to accomplish what it hoped to accomplish. A critical aspect of this “outreach” has been Britain’s embrace of Shariah finance, Islam’s religions version of banking. As Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared in 2006, London was going to be the Islamic Banking Capital of the World. Why? Money, and he got it. But along with Muslim money comes Muslim Law, Sharia law.

At the June 13, 2006 Islamic Finance Trade Conference in London, Brown revealed, "Today British banks are pioneering Islamic banking - London now has more banks supplying services under Islamic principles than any other Western financial centre."

By 2012 police, as in London, will be running from the Islamic Jihad in American streets.

Cancer starts as a microbe
Because so many top business leaders, university professors, government officials, and religious leaders in Great Britain have bought into the fiction that Shariah Banking is just a harmless religious requirement for Islamic investment, there are few there in positions of leadership left to fight against Shariah. While I noted a positive development, the re-thinking of some of the British policy regarding the connection between Islamist doctrine and terrorism, can such a shift actually occur with Britain so beholden to Shariah finance and its money without a civil war, (Islamic Jihad)?

For those of you who have seen Joy Brighton's video about Shariah finance on Brigitte Gabriel’s website, you will know that one of the leading "Shariah finance scholars" himself, Sheik Qawadari, describes Shariah Banking as "Jihad with Money.” You will know the story of what Shariah Banking is, its connection to the Shariah Law of Wahhabist Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Taliban, and will know that its creation as a tool of political Islam to control global economics is not being told.

You will also know that Shariah is already here in the U.S., thanks to the lack of oversight by the SEC and U.S. Treasury Department, and the acceptance of Shariah finance by institutions such as Citibank, HSBC, UBS and AIG, (read the article)

Is the West ready for this? Actually, the better question to ask is this: Does the West understand that the embrace of Shariah finance is the eventual embrace of the brutal and oppressive Shariah law? The answer is no… Read the response I received from AIG regarding my warning about Sharia Finance, they haven’t got a clue.

Because of this deception the States of Minnesota and Michigan have officially adopted Sharia Finance and incorporated it into their standard banking system. The cancer is no longer a microbe, it is beginning to metastasize.

The problem is this, as with a cancer, Islam does not become part of your culture. You will become part of theirs. As I have recently written in the article titled to the shores of Som-ali” , the U.S. has been at war with Islam for 200 years already , and as the Western Europeans in the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries didn’t recognize that they had already been at war with Islam for three hundred years before they became cognizant of the fact that Islam does not assimilate, they would have to --- they didn’t want to, so 200 years of war began. This 200 years of war insolently, was called the Crusades.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Most Americans have never experienced war, except by way of a video that is happening in someone else’s yard in some far away land. But that is not the kind of war that I am talking about. I’m talking about the kind of war that takes place in your yard.

As the Western Europeans both of more than a thousand years ago as well as today didn’t and do not understand the most fundamental truth about Islam, and that is that they will never assimilate and the will never stop.

America is following right in the British footsteps of the Greed that leads to Hell.

de Andréa

Friday, April 24, 2009

‘Mother may I’

This is what the once free America will be asking of the new ‘National’ not Federal Government of the United States.

By de Andréa

President Obama showed his socialistic hand this week when The New York Times wrote that he is considering converting the stock the government owns in our country's banks from preferred stock, which it now holds, to common stock.

That’s right, and since the new National Government is the largest stock holder in over 500 financial companies, the Government would control the economy.

This seemingly insignificant change is actually momentous. It means that the federal (New National) government will control all of the major banks and financial institutions in the nation. It means socialism.

The Times dutifully put a spin on the Obama plan, deceptively disguised as a way to avoid asking Congress for more money for failing banks. But the implications of the proposal are obvious to anyone with at least a half of an unwashed brain.

When the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) intervention was first outlined by the Bush administration, it did not call for any transfer of stock, of any sort, to the government, not even Preferred.

The Democrats demanded, as a price for their support, that the taxpayers "get something back" for the money they were lending to the banks. House Republicans, wise to what was going on, rejected the administration's proposal, and sought, instead, to provide insurance to banks, rather than outright cash. Their plan did not involve any transfer of stock. But Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., not surprisingly undercut his own party's conservatives and went along with the Democratic plan to nationalize the banks, ensuring its passage.

But to avoid the issue of a potential for government control of the banks, everybody agreed that the stock the feds would take back in return for their money would be “preferred stock”, “not common stock”. "Preferred stock" means that these stockholders get the first crack at dividends, but only common stockholders can actually vote on company management or policy.

Now, by changing this fundamental element of the TARP plan, Obama will give Washington a voting majority among the common stockholders of these banks and other financial institutions. The almost 500 companies receiving TARP money will be, in effect, run by Washington.

And whoever controls the banks, controls the credit, and therefore the economy.
That's called socialism my friend.

Obama is dressing up the idea of the switch to common stock by noting that the conversion would provide the banks with capital they could use without a further taxpayer appropriation.

While this is true, it flies in the face of the fact that an increasing number of big banks and brokerage houses are clamoring to give back the TARP money. Goldman-Sachs, for example, wants to buy back its freedom, as do many banks. Even AIG is selling off assets to dig its way out from under federal control.

The reason, of course, is that company executives do not like the restrictions that come with TARP money. It is for this reason that Chrysler Motors refused TARP funds.

With bank profits up and financial institutions trying to give back their money, there is no need for the conversion of the government stock from preferred to common — except to advance the political socialist agenda of this administration.

Meanwhile, to keep its leverage over the economy intact, the Obama administration is refusing to let banks and other companies give back the TARP money until they pass a financial "stress test."

Nominally, the government justifies this procedure by saying that it does not want companies to become fully private prematurely and then need more help later on.

But don't believe it, my friend

They want to keep the TARP money in the banks so they can have a reason and rationale to control them.

THE BOTTOM LINE is simple. If you are an entrepreneur, a small business owner like me, then get ready to be an employee of the new National Socialist Government of America.

de Andréa

Thursday, April 23, 2009

When Only Criminals Have Guns

When the people have no right to bear Arms, should Christians “carry” guns?

By de Andréa
April 22, 2009

The Apostle Paul wrote in a letter to Timothy, “But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially of those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever…” “Provision” includes providing security. In fact our Lord Jesus taught, “If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.” Quoting Jesus again, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind,' and 'your neighbor as yourself,” Are we loving our neighbor when we stand helplessly by and do nothing when he is being murdered or a woman is being raped?

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms”… is not only a God given right supported by the Supreme Law of America but it is a command of God as well.

Should church members be armed?
Author Charl Van Wyk, who shot back at terrorists attacking a church meeting, will be touring the U.S. with tales of his African ministry, including his first-hand experience with Christian churches that aren't prepared to defend themselves.

Van Wyk's story of shooting back on July 25, 1993, when terrorists attacked and killed 11 people and injured another five dozen at a South African church, has been chronicled in his book "Shooting Back: The Right and Duty of Self-Defense."

Police later told him the terrorists confessed that their plan was to kill everyone in the church, possibly 1,000 people or more, and his armed response is credited with saving many lives that day.

Through his ministry with Frontline Fellowship, Van Wyk has been working in regions that could be called "war-torn" sections of Africa, except that in the Congo, for example, there is no one shooting back, no one is armed like he was during the St. James Massacre to prevent further bloodshed. Rather than calling these places "war-torn zones," Van Wyk contends, they should simply be called “Gun Free Murder Zones."

Van Wyk warns of the plight of Congolese churches he has seen in a nation where outlaws carry guns, but the people have no right to bear arms.

After interviewing a woman whose village was raped and terrorized by armed rebels and learning of a pastor who was buried alive while his congregation helpless to fight back, Van Wyk wrote a letter to the editor in the Congo, it began: "It is very difficult for armed thugs to perform such tyranny if the local population were armed and could defend themselves. This kind of thuggery can only take place in a gun-free zone.”

A memory of the massacre in the “Gun Free Zone” of Virginia Tech University comes to mind.
“To create a safe nation, arm the population," Van Wyk said, referring to the recently much-publicized massacre of more than a dozen immigrants in New York, he added, "An armed citizen could have made a difference at Binghamton."

"When last did you hear of a multiple-victim shooting taking place on a firearm range, in a police station or at a gun show, or wherever many firearms are found anywhere in the world? You haven't. That's because criminals prefer unarmed victims, or soft targets," Van Wyk says. "No wonder they love gun control – it makes their satanic work so much easier and their working environment much safer."

Van Wyk's experience in regions of Africa where criminals are armed but the citizenry is not has seasoned his perspective, but he warns that Americans cannot fail to be diligent in protecting their Second Amendment rights.

While we are approaching the 15-year anniversary of what now is known as the St. James Massacre, the United Nations has a disarmament program to remove private firearms from all nations. Hundreds of millions of people throughout the world suffer hideously through political systems, which have imposed a disarmament program based on the lies of banning guns will stop crime. This is reminiscent of Hitler’s deception to confiscate all the guns before his despotic oppression began.

He added, "In South Africa, the communist-inspired African National Congress is imposing a politically motivated disarmament program that will leave law-abiding citizens defenseless.” There is a war of worldviews on gun control being fought right now across the world as well as in America.

"We have no choice except action," he said. "The results of gun control can indeed be catastrophic, e.g., Rwanda was a gun-free zone and so too is Zimbabwe today. This period of our history is decisive. Are our children going to live as slaves or as a free people?"

THE BOTTOM LINE: So what does this have to do with the Christian Church in America? If you don’t know then read this article again only this time replace Congo with America, replace Zimbabwe with America, replace Rwanda with America. There is now, more than ever before a thrust to disarm America and the rest of the world. A gun free Zone is a place where criminals and tyrants rule.

It’s already happening in our schools and in our churches. Read Church Shootings in America.
There is a good reason why the architects of our free ‘Constitutional Republic’ supported our God given responsibility to “keep and bear arms”. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” (Article II of the bill of rights) It is necessary to the security of a free State. And this my friend, is being illegally infringed upon --- big time --- by the Godless tyrants of our liberal government.

Without it, we not only lose the precious gift of freedom, but the precious life that God gave us as well.

In Proverbs 25:26 God says: “A righteous man who falters before the wicked is like a murky spring and a polluted well.”

It is our responsibility.

It is the law of America and of God…

de Andréa

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

…”to the Shores of Som-ali”.

One of the ignorant arguments made by those who are enamored with ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Multi-Culturalism’ is that the growing Islamist militancy directed at the United States is a direct result of our failed Middle Eastern policies. As I said, ignorant arguments…

By de Andréa

Now that Somali Jihadist Pirates have increased their attacks to merit a regular place on the 6:00 news, it may be useful to take a quick look back at history – at the role that the Barbary Jihadist pirates played in the development of the United States Navy.

Two hundred years ago the U.S. had no “Middle East policy” for Islamists to quarrel with except to pay the Muslim pirate demanded tribute called the Jizyah. Our foreign policy then was decidedly isolationist. And yet in spite of submitting to the demands of the muslins, for four decades, the so-called “Barbary Pirates” raided American shipping, kidnapped and murdered American citizens, and in general wreaked havoc on our country, moreover they continue yet today and once again we are in submission to them. Watch a video of American president al-Obammah bowing in submission to the King of Islam.

Independent and knowledgeable historians, who don’t owe their souls to the political establishment and do not bow down to political correctness, understand why the Barbary Pirates of Tripoli did what they did – they were Islamic Terrorist Jihadists then, and the Somali Pirates of today are still Islamic Terrorist Jihadists. Proof again that Islam will never change direction. They as the Nazis did in the 1930’s and 40’s are simply following a script written in the Quran and in the Hadith.

So why is the alphabet soup media avoiding stating this fact? Because the American media never tells the truth, that’s why!!! Those who ignore the truth of history are condemned to repeat it.

Get set for a profound lesson in history not taught in the ‘Liberal Indoctrinational Institutions’ that are today, tragically misnamed as “Institutions of education”

The Somali Piracy in Context On April 6 in an address to the parliament of Turkey, US President Obama said that the relationship between the United States and the "Muslim world" is an important one. "In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical," the president said. During the same address the President stated, "We are not at war with Islam. We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many centuries to shape the world for the better, including my own country.”

First of all, this jerk does not speak for me, even though he thinks he is my president. The arrogant assumption he coveys by saying “"We are not at war with Islam. [and] We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith”… Well I for one want his ‘Grand Mufti al-Obammah’ to know that ‘I am’ at war with Islam, and that I have absolutely no appreciation for the Muslim faith, deep, or otherwise. His arrogant effrontery assumption of the usage of the personal pronoun “WE” and using it as a noun or even a proper noun to identify the specific citizens of America like you and me or we, that he thinks he represents is at best obnoxious, at worst treasons.

Moreover, Mr. Obama has at least neglected to explain in what way(s) Islam has shaped and improved the United States or for that matter, anything or anyplace since the year 610 AD. The founding fathers of the United States were Christians and not Muslims, therefore did not, and do not share Mr. Obama's deep appreciation for ‘the Islamic Terrorist faith’. In fact Jefferson, Adams, JQ Adams, and Benjamin Franklin were all were deeply concerned about the dangers that Islam represented to the new nation of America. Today according our government, they are just a warm and fuzzy peaceful Nation, (a politically-correct policy.)

I have written about this subject many times in the past, but I thought it worth repeating, especially in light of the recent Islamic Piracy, this time off the coast of Somali instead of the Barbary Coast of Tripoli.

Our ongoing experiences with the 21st century version of the Barbary pirates off the coast of Somalia, most recently today when an American freighter captain was freed from pirate captivity by the US Navy, illustrates a great deal about our prior relations with the so-called "religion of peace" and how our previous leaders reacted. There is little discussion in the mainstream press about the link between Somali Islamic, piracy, and Islamic Jihad, but it is historically one in the same nonetheless.

In spite of the news media distancing itself from the recent attack on a cruise ship off the coast of Somalia from global terrorism, intelligence experts believe this is just the latest operation initiated against the United States and the West by Al-Qaeda. (Source)

The irony perhaps is that Islam did in fact play a very important role in the early stages of the development of the United States - Islam was directly responsible for the early development of the United States Navy and Marines for the concepts that allowed for its deployment far from our coasts.

The American Navy is not a river navy or coastal defense force; it is a global tool of American power whose origins can be traced directly back to an earlier American-Islam confrontation. After the American Revolution, pirates from the Barbary States (Algiers, Morocco) attacked American shipping off the coast of North Africa in the Mediterranean and took the crews. This piracy against American shipping started in 1784 and finally ended in 1815. The Islamic rulers of these Barbary States demanded payment of tribute from our new country and it was paid, and paid. President Jefferson sent a naval force against the pirates in 1803-05. The Marine Corps were also sent in and after a long overland march, took the city of Tripoli in 1805 (thus "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Corps hymn). Is the Somali piracy of today related to the Barbary pirates of the early 19th century? When then Ambassadors Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Ambassador from Tripoli in 1785, to reach a solution to the attacks against American shipping and crews, they were immersed into a very dark world in which we are still subjected today.

"When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” (Source) The Barbary piracy was based upon the doctrine of Islam, calling for endless war against the unbeliever everywhere, including at sea.

To Muslims in the heyday of Barbary piracy, there were, at least in principle, only two forces at play in the world: the Dar al-Islam, or House of Islam, and the Dar al-Harb, or House of War. The House of Islam meant Muslim governance and the unrivaled authority of the Sharia, Islam’s complex system of holy law. The House of War was simply everything that fell outside of the House of Islam — that area of the globe not under Muslim authority, where the infidel ruled. For Muslims, these two houses were perpetually at war — at least until mankind should finally embrace Allah and his teachings as revealed through his prophet, Mohammed.

Today, we are dealing with the same Islam. Islam is considered perfect, unchangeable, unchallengeable, by adherents. It is the perfect word of the perfect Allah, and carried to the world by Mohammed, the perfect example of humanity for all Muslims to emulate,

History has returned, again.
"The Barbary pirates were not a “radical” or “fundamentalist” sect that had “hijacked” or twisted religious doctrine for power and politics, or that came to recast aspects of their faith out of some form of insanity. They were simply a Islamic North African warrior caste involved in an armed jihad — a mainstream Muslim doctrine. This is how the Muslims understood Barbary piracy and armed Jihad at the time, and, indeed, how the physical jihad has been understood since Mohammed revealed it as the prophecy of Allah."

If the United States was unable to fight the pirates, they would be forced to continue to pay extortion to the Barbary States, a kind of high seas Jizya tax. Jefferson was immediately determined to fight. When he became president he was able to implement the plans that he had formulated after diplomacy to resolve the Barbary piracy had failed. And are we in the same position now? During a phone conversation with a journalist prior to the attack against them by US Navy Seals to free the captured American sailor, one of the Somali Jihadist/pirates said, "We never kill people. We are Muslims. We are marines, coastguards -- not pirates," one said. Not quite marines, not quite coastguard, at least not in the civilized world.

Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America's minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress. As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter, "I acknowledge [sic] I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war.” Paying tribute or giving in to demands, will merely invite more demands, and even if a coalition proves workable, the only solution is a strong navy that can reach the pirates, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: "The states must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some one of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both.” "From what I learn from the temper of my countrymen and their tenaciousness of their money," Jefferson added in a December 26, 1786, letter to the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles, "it will be more easy to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them.” (Source)

When he became the 3rd President, Jefferson took action, and the United States Navy was sent to deal with the Barbary Coast pirates, which they did.

When Jefferson became president in 1801 he refused to accede to Tripoli's demands for an immediate payment of $225,000 and an annual payment of $25,000. The pasha of Tripoli then declared war on the United States. Although as secretary of state and vice president he had opposed developing an American navy capable of anything more than coastal defense, President Jefferson dispatched a squadron of naval vessels to the Mediterranean. As he declared in his first annual message to Congress: "To this state of general peace with which we have been blessed, one only exception exists. Tripoli, the least considerable of the Barbary States, had come forward with demands unfounded either in right or in compact, and had permitted itself to denounce war, on our failure to comply before a given day. The style of the demand admitted but one answer. I sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean. . . .

" We can trace the development of the US Navy directly to Thomas Jefferson's interaction with Jihadist pirates. Our Muslim President Obama was right about the "Islamic faith" having "done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country," but probably not in the way that he had intended. The development of our national defense capabilities are fundamentally linked with an American conflict with Islam in 1805. John Quincy Adams didn't have to deal with the Barbary States directly as president, but his father John Adams did. Considered one of the most brilliant men to sit in the White House, J Q Adams is particularly perceptive about Islam. His warnings on the matter ring as true today as they did more than 100 years ago. The Islam that Adams discusses is the same Islam we see today.

John Quincy Adams possessed a remarkably clear, uncompromised understanding of the permanent Islamic institutions of Jihad war and dhimmitude. Regarding Jihad, Adams states in his essay series. Just how did John Quincy Adams know so much about Islam and how to, or not to, deal with them? He read their books…the Quran and the Hadith, something that our Government has failed to do. Confirming Adams’ assessment, the late Muslim scholar, Professor Majid Khadduri, wrote the following in his authoritative 1955 treatise on Jihad, War and Peace in the Law of Islam:

“Thus the jihad may be regarded as Islam’s instrument for carrying out its ultimate objective by turning all people into believers, if not in the prophet-hood of Muhammad (as in the case of the dhimmahs), at least in the belief of God. ...The universality of Islam, in its all embracing creed, is imposed on the believers as a continuous process of warfare, psychological and political if not strictly military.” source

There is a certain bizarre justice here that our Navy ships were on hand to affect the release of an American ship captain through military action against Somali pirates likely affiliated with Islamism because of events that occurred with other Islamist pirates more than 200 years ago. When you hear in the mainstream press pundits and commentators saying that the Somali piracy is "unprecedented", don't believe it because it is and ignorant lie

And don't believe that our current struggle with political Islam is also unprecedented. This is a conflict of 1400 years. Since 9/11 some of us have accepted this truth. Long before our generation, other Americans struggled with similar matters. Our founding fathers fought the Jihadists of the Barbary States and came to know Islam through their Jihad against innocent unbelievers. By 1830 John Quincy Adams had not forgotten the lesson. We must learn the same lesson again; then, never forget it. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. If we today choose to ignore the lessons of history we are simply condemned - we will have no opportunity to repeat.

“In the seventh century of the Christian era a wandering Arab, of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combing the powers of transcendent genius with the preternatural energy of a fanatic and the fraudulent spirit of an imposter,[Lucifer] proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting, from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God, he connected indissolubly with it the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war as part of his religion against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust; to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature. Between these two religions, thus contrasted in the characters, a war of more than twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extincture of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute are encouraged to furnish motives to human action, there never can be peace on earth and good will toward men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him.” John Adams, 1830

–John Quincy Adams, “Christianity—Islamism” “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War, and on Greece,” originally published in The American Annual Register for 1827—1829 (New York, 1830), Chs. X-XIV: 267—402. (Source)

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is a tragic footing we find ourselves moored in with this historical ignorance, almost as if it were a disease, a deception so prevalent among our government officials. Without the knowledge of where one has been, it is a problem to comprehend just how one can be cognizant of where one is going. I believe this identifies the reason for the flailing nature of our leaders. It is quite simply a lack of intellectual knowledge of history. Unless one is cognizant of the lesson that history teaches, history is just a useless story of fiction. Ignorance of history condemns one or all to repeat the same tragic mistakes all over again.

We will soon find ourselves reliving the eighth, ninth, and tenth century’s of Western Europe. We as Americans have been fighting Islam for 200 years now, I suppose we have yet another one hundred years to go before we as the people of western Europe discovered after 300 years of Islamic infiltration, that if they (the people of Europe) did not rid themselves of the demonic curse of Islam, they would become Muslim rather that the Muslims becoming Europeans.

Does a fish become a frog? Yes, but a frog, never becomes a fish.

It is just the nature of things…

de Andréa

Monday, April 20, 2009

Has The Tyranny of America Begun?

If you still don’t believe that your Government has declared war on Christians then this article is for you. I have film…

By de Andréa

Referring to my previous articles titled Declaration of War and The New enemy of the State , proof that the war on Christian Conservatives or anyone that doesn’t agree with the direction that this administration is going, that the tyranny of this administration has begun, is born out in this totally unprovoked attack on an innocent Baptist Pastor by Federal border agents and local police 75 miles from any border.

The classified orders giving by Secretary Janet Napolitano, the new Obama ‘enforcer stooge’--- chief of the so-called U.S. Homeland security regime to begin the war on Christian Conservatives, was actually leaked to the press and wasn’t supposed to be known by the Citizens of America until we began to realize that Christian Constitutional Conservatives were being arrested on trumped up charges, tortured and beaten like what happened to an Arizona Baptist pastor this past week.

An Arizona pastor was Tasered, beaten, stomped, and bloodied, by broken glass, and sporting 11 stitches in his head – claims his injuries came from being stopped at a Border Patrol checkpoint 75 miles inside the U.S. while traveling from San Diego California to Phoenix Arizona. Several miles east of Yuma he was stopped and battered and tortured by police for refusing to allow agents to search his vehicle for human trafficking even though he was obviously the only one in the vehicle.

The incident earlier this week highlights the new war on the citizens of America, the tension between constitutional rights, the issue of border security, and a controversial Supreme Court ruling that grants homeland security an exceptional level of police authority near the Mexican border. The fact that this was 75 miles from any border I guess didn’t occur to the U.S. Federalies. Pastor Steven Anderson of “Faithful Word” Baptist Church in Tempe Arizona claims he did nothing to deserve his eventual arrest and believes that when he refused to allow the search of his car he was simply standing up for his Fourth Amendment rights, which protect him against unreasonable search without a warrant or probable cause.

Anderson further questions why the Border Patrol is allowed without provocation to randomly stop and search cars at a checkpoint along Interstate 8, 75 miles inland of where the highway nears the Mexican border at Yuma, Arizona.

"I was in the United States! I had crossed no international border!" writes Pastor Anderson in commentary accompanying a video he made about his experience. "I didn't have any drugs; I didn't have human beings in my car," he claims in the video itself. "Why is this happening in the United States of America?"

This is where the Pastor went wrong, the claim that he did nothing to deserve this torture, beating and abuse, is just wrong. You see he made a near fatal mistake, he thought that he was still living in the ‘Free Nation of America’, he obviously was not aware that he is now living in the ‘Oppressive Obama-Nation’ and has no rights at all.

Pastor Anderson's video explaining his side of the controversy and his rough treatment at the hands of police officers can be seen here: Watch the video of Pastor Steven Anderson

While we knew that we needed a relationship and communication between our security and intelligence agencies, most of us never realized that the very agencies and government that was supposed to protect us, would one day be used to oppress and abuse us. Well my friend, ‘The Tyranny of America Has Begun’.

Although the fact that Steven Anderson as a Christian Pastor likely had nothing to do with him being stopped, when he introduced himself however as Pastor Steven Anderson all the whistles bells and sirens went off and Pastor Anderson became the “Enemy of the State”

You see Christians are most often conservative and are against The United Nations, The New World Order, Gun Control, The Federal Reserve Act, The Income Tax, The Ammunition and Accountability Act, A possible Constitutional Convention, The North American Union, Universal Service Program, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, The Fairness Doctrine, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Abortion, Gay Marriage, Open Borders, Islam, Illegal Immigration, just to name a few, in other words Americans who believe in the ‘Constitutional Republic of the United States of America’, and therefore have been reclassified by Janet Napolitano and the Homeland Security agency as “domestic terrorists’ an thereby deserving of scrutiny, abuse torture, and arrest. Reverend Steven Anderson didn’t say whether or not he was in or had been in the military, but that also would be a red flag according to Homeland Security.

It is interesting that returning veterans, conservatives, and Christians are now classified as "rightwing extremists" and are associated with white supremacists and violent anti-government terrorist groups, while at the same time Napolitano has reduced the status of the Nation of Islam from terrorism to “man-caused disasters,” a more touchy feely identification for those that have murdered more than 250, 000.000 yes that’s millions of people just because they didn’t like them. We American conservatives are now the new enemies of al-Barack Hussein al-Obammah. And oh! ---bear in mind that his ‘hinnies al- Obama’ says that we are not at war with Islam, no of course not, because “The Obama-Nation” is at war with anyone that might disagree with him and his Muslim Communist regime.

Have you bowed toward Mecca today???

de Andréa

Friday, April 17, 2009

A Declaration of War

The U.S. Government has declared war against the American people and our Constitution.
By de Andrea

Yesterday I published an article titled ”The New Enemy of the State” and declared how this new enemy is “you”… Now a declaration of war exists between the U.S. “National Government” and the ‘Citizens of a Free America’. Although I new this was coming, I never thought it would happen in my life time.

This may call for a new “Declaration of Independence” from the ever and increasing oppressive Government of the [dis]-United States of America. This ‘Federal DHS Declaration’ together with the “Missouri Document” amounts to a declaration of war against the free people of America.

"It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution. It is a prelude to extreme gun control legislation and hate speech laws targeting Christian churches and others who oppose abortion and same sex marriage. The federal government should be focusing its attention on the 35 radical Muslim terrorists camps in the U.S. training its followers on how to kidnap and kill Americans," says Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich.,

But then president al-Obammah said “we are not a war with Islam”, obviously no, because the U.S. Government is to busy focusing on the war with its own citizens. If this doesn’t sound like the old USSR regime then I don’t know what does.

Radio talk show host Michael Savage has teamed up with the Thomas More Law Center to file a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.
"It is a civil rights action brought under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, challenging the policy, practice, and custom of the United States Government that targets for disfavored treatment those individuals and groups that are considered to be 'rightwing extremists,'" the complaint announced today said.

The federal agency recently targeted those individuals in its report called "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." Read the report for yourself.

According to the federal government, members of the suspect group of people include those who:
Oppose infringements on the Second Amendment
Oppose illegal immigration
Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs
Oppose continuation of free trade agreements
Oppose same-sex marriage
Oppose Abortion
Oppose Communist regimes
Oppose one world government
Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world
And those that are upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India etc, etc, etc

The case seeks a declaration that the DHS policy violates the First and Fifth Amendments, a court order permanently enjoining the policy and its application to the plaintiffs' speech and other activities, and the award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.

The Law Center said it had submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the DHS, demanding to know why it targets Americans who oppose abortion, support the 2nd Amendment, and dislike illegal immigration etc, as “domestic terrorist extremists."

"This is not an intelligence report but a diatribe against those who oppose the policies of the Obama administration. It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution”. Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the organization, said of the request.

Are you ready for a second Declaration of Independence? Sign the petition promoting true freedom once again!

Amy Kudwa, a spokeswoman for the DHS, said the agency as a matter of policy doesn't comment on pending litigation.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on behalf of Savage, Gregg Cunningham of the pro-life Center for Bio-Ethical Reform and Iraqi War Marine veteran Kevin Murray.

The federal agency's action "encourages law enforcement officers throughout the nation to target and report citizens to federal officials as suspicious rightwing Christian conservative extremists and potential terrorists because of their beliefs."

"The report even admits that the department has no specific information on any plans of violence by so-called 'rightwing extremists.’ Rather, what they do have is the expression of political opinions by certain individuals and organizations that oppose the Obama administration’s policies, and this expression is protected speech under the First Amendment," Thompson said.

"Janet Napolitano is lying to the American people when she says the report is not based on ideology or political beliefs. In fact, her report would have the admiration of any current or past dictator in the way it targets political opponents," he said.

The legal action alleges the policy "is a tool of intimidation for federal, state, and local government officials. It provides a basis for government officials to abuse their positions of power to stifle political opinion and opposition. Pursuant to the 'Rightwing Extremism Policy,' federal officials will work with state, local, tribal, and private sector entities to conduct surveillance and to gather information in order to deter the activities of those individuals and groups considered to be 'rightwing extremists,'" the legal brief said.

The DHS intention is to enforce the policy through "state and local fusion centers, which are local intelligence centers created by DHS to combat 'terrorism' and related activities that are deemed to be 'criminal,'" the case said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: First I would like to say “I told you so” yes years ago I said the end of freedom is coming. Secondly I would say to Michel Savage ‘bravo my patriotic friend’.

I have to admit though; I truly thought the ‘Oppressive Nation of Islam’ would take over the United States before our own ‘Oppressive Government’ would. But on second thought maybe it is one in the same.

You know! Two birds with one rock…

de Andréa.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

The New Enemy of the State

Our government has not even identified our last enemy and they have already come up with a new one.

By de Andréa

So just who is this New Enemy of the State??? Well…it’s…’you’.

Do you believe that the Constitution of the United States of America ‘was, is, and should be’ the supreme law of the land? Then you are the new ‘Enemy of the State’. Do you believe in freedom and God given rights? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Do you call yourself a ‘Christian Conservative’? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Are you in the military or ex-military? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Do you consider yourself an American? Then you are the new enemy of the State.

According to news reports, the New al-Obama Department of Homeland Security headed by Janet Napolitano, is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," labeling citizens ‘opposed to the “BILL OF RIGHTS” restrictions’, returning veterans, conservatives, and Christians as "rightwing extremists" and associating them with white supremacists and violent anti-government terrorist groups, while at the same time reducing the status of the Nation of Islam from terrorists to “man-caused disasters,” a more touchy feely identification for those that have murdered more than 250, 000.000 yes that’s millions of people just because they didn’t like them. We Americans are the new enemies of al-Barack Hussein al-Obammah. No…not because I say so, but because he says so, and oh---bear in mind that his ‘hinnies al- Obama’ says that we are not at war with Islam. No of course not, because he has just submitted the entire United States of America to the Nation of Islam by bowing down to their King.

You read that right -- it appears that the Obama Administration, and especially the DHS under the Obama puppet Janet Napolitano, is trying to demonize political dissent. And it's no big surprise who is directly in their crosshairs: supporters of the “Bill of Rights”, including veterans and gun owners.

Who is funding this kind of nonsense? Well… YOU are. Why would your government spend your money attacking YOU, instead of spending your money PROTECTING you? Because you are the “New Enemy of the State” my friend, you are the ‘new terrorists’.

The report also says that Congressional debates about abortion, illegal immigration and gun control make extremist groups suspicious and give them a rallying cry:

"It is unclear if either bill will be passed into law; nonetheless, a correlation may exist between the potential passage of gun control legislation and increased hoarding of ammunition, weapons stockpiling, and paramilitary training activities among rightwing extremists, [terrorists]" the report said.

Why are they worried? Because since November, more than 7 million people have applied for criminal background checks in order to buy weapons. And as far as the Obama administration is concerned, buying guns equals "weapons stockpiling," buying ammo equals "hoarding of ammunition," and expressing concern about Congress passing gun control legislation qualifies YOU as part of an "extremist group" and therefore the enemy of his new ‘Socialist State of America’

Therefore, you and I are now being viewed as dangerous rightwing extremists that law enforcement officials need to be on the watch for!


This report was released "hot on the heels" of another (state) government agency report in February: dubbed the Missouri Document--- the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report titled, "MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement.” In this horrific "law enforcement sensitive" secret police report, Governor Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon; John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety; James Keathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van Godsey, Director of MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential violence-prone "militia members."

According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you qualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member" and therefore a terrorist and an Enemy of the State:

If you oppose---
The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve Act
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
The Fairness Doctrine
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Gay Marriage
Open Borders
Illegal Immigration

Just to name a few…

Well, there you have it! You see? Then you ARE a dangerous rightwing extremist, and the ‘New Enemy of the State’.

As ridiculous as that report seems, it was distributed to law enforcement officials across the state of Missouri. And it wasn't until the state government was FLOODED with protests from patriotic Americans across the country, that they finally came out and denounced and retracted the MIAC document.

But now, it's happened again -- but this time, at the Federal level! Our own Federal Government is turning against us, and unless there is a HUGE outpouring of outrage from every part of this nation, it will just keep getting WORSE!

Interestingly enough, no left-leaning political ideologies were identified. No Islamic extremists. No environmental extremists. No anti-American anti-Constitutionalists. Only people holding "conservative" or "right-wing" philosophies were identified in BOTH the MIAC report AND the Homeland Security "assessment" as Enemies of the State.

This shouldn't be too surprising: both of these reports are similar to several other reports currently circulating around various State police agencies, courtesy of DHS-sponsored "Fusion Centers." MIAC is one of those Centers, sponsored by the DHS, and ordered by our new dictator His Excellency al-Barrack Hussein al- Obammah

So now, even military veterans who fought and risked their lives for our liberty and freedom are targets of our own government: The Homeland Security assessment specifically says that "rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.” Does that include me? No I’m Afraid I am too old.

The authors of this assessment are pushing an "Us against Them" philosophy. You and I are being marginalized -- labeled as fringe kooks, "rightwing terrorist extremists," so that it will be easier to violate our liberties and take away our Constitutional rights in the future.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The only thing that will put a STOP to this nonsense is a huge public outcry opposing it. If we do nothing, it will soon be too late to do anything. We either stop it NOW, or it will grow into an out-of-control monster that will monitor and control the personal opinions and speech of every man, woman, and child in this country.

The Irony of this issue is that: This --- my friend is exactly what our Constitution is supposed to prevent our government from doing. Moreover in case all else fails we have the right of the Second Amendment, which Reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, Shall NOT BE INFRINGED. (Emphasis mine)

Isn’t it interesting that we the people are being accused of forming “a well regulated Militia” as is our right, because it may be “necessary to the security of a free State.” Moreover we the People are being accused of “keeping and bearing arms”, and as our Constitutional law says, the Government “Shell not infringe” on our right to do so.

Just whom… May I ask --- is ‘The New Enemy of the State’ here???

de Andréa

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The first Islamic State

Which State will become the first Islamic state in America? In any event, one by one we will become an Islamic Nation

By de Andréa

The state of Michigan for all purposes is in the process of becoming an Islamic State one small town at a time. It will be a close race between the state of Michigan and the state of Minnesota as to who will actually be the first. Islam lays claim to at least three major cities and many more smaller rural towns with Islamic counsels and one with a Muslim Mayor in the state of Michigan. Sharia law is surreptitiously and incrementally being implemented.

As I said it is a race that is hard to call, just who will be the first completely Islamic State in America totally governed by Sharia is anybody’s guess.

Today however Minnesota continues to make the news with stories of suspected Somali-born Islamic terrorists coming out of the state; and Muslims are winning a legal battle against a meat processing facility that refused to knuckle under to their demands; one of at least 20 tax supported publicly-funded charter schools operate in Minnesota this one is called Tarek ibn Zayed Academy (TiZA), and is being sued by the ACLU on the grounds it impermissibly promotes Islam; Muslim cab drivers refusing to pick up passengers who carry alcohol; a community college where the interfaith chapel was taken over by Muslim students and turned into a de facto mosque.

Minnesota has also dived into the world of Shariah law through its state-sponsored program of home mortgage products that are Shariah-compliant.

Is there a coincidence between Minnesota’s efforts to accommodate its Muslim immigrant population and the degree of terrorism that is bubbling up in the state? As Great Britain has learned, and is beginning to re-think, a policy of disconnecting the supremacist ideology of political Islam from mainstream Islam has proven to be a failure.

Great Britain has shown us how not to deal with the threat of Islamic terrorism, but it may be tempting for us to dismiss Britain’s experience as unrelated to us here in the U.S. because, well…they’re “over there.” Could Minnesota be emerging as one of America’s exemplars of how not to deal with this threat? I mean, doesn’t the same logic apply, after all, aren’t…“Michigan and Minnesota way up their???”

FBI raids 3 Minneapolis money-transfer shops
Federal agents raided three Minneapolis money transfer businesses that mainly serve the Somali community Wednesday, seeking records of financial transactions to several African and Middle East countries.

E.K. Wilson, a special agent for the FBI in Minneapolis, confirmed that agents searched the businesses on the city's south side to track money transactions. The businesses are Qaran Express and Aaran Financial, both in the Karmel Mall, near W. Lake Street and Pillsbury Avenue S., and North American Money Transfer Inc., also known as Mustaqbal Express, at the Village Market Mall, at E. 24th Street and Chicago Avenue S.

It's not absolutely clear that the raid was directly connected to a continuing federal investigation into the possible link between these terrorist groups and the disappearances of up to 20 young Somali men in the Twin Cities over the past two years.

Without a trace disappearances are not isolated to Minnesota however. Since 1991 unsolved cases across America of missing persons of any gender, ethnic and religious background have taken a sharp spike upward for no apparent reason other than the increase in Muslim population in the U.S. has spiked in the same way during the same time period. Insolently this spike in missing persons is what originally inspired the TV program “Without a Trace” but isolating the show to possible Islamic terrorism was deemed to be too politically incorrect and anti-multicultural to portray as Islamic terrorist abductions or kidnappings.

To stem the flow of American dollars to our enemy is a little like trying to swim up a water fall. This is mainly because we haven’t yet identified just who our enemy is. His Majesty al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah says that we are not at war with Islam. This is of course a-kin to saying that we were not at war with Nazism during the Second World War. I for one would like to know just who we are at war with, and with some degree of certainty.

Two months after the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, federal agents froze the assets of five Somali-related operations at three locations in Minneapolis because of suspicions that they were laundering money to Osama bin Laden or his terrorist organization Al-Qaida. In the end, we didn’t bother to indicate any of them.

Somali residents had bemoaned the shutdowns, saying that the businesses were their only way of getting money to impoverished relatives in Somalia. I can only imagine that some of these impoverished relatives are the Somali pirates that are hijacking our ships in the Gulf of Aden. We may have to revise the Marine Hymn to read “from the Halls of Montezuma to the shores of Som-al-i”

The search warrant executed at North American Money Transfer originated in the Eastern District of Missouri and was filed under seal on April 3. It states that FBI agents were seeking any documentation regarding money sent to "any person, business or entity where such transfers were destined for locations in: Somalia, Eritrea, Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and United Arab Emirates" between January 2007 and the present.

North American Money Transfer is based in Atlanta and has locations in Washington, Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri, Tennessee, Ohio, North Carolina, and Georgia. Its Mustaqbal Express location in the Village Market Mall is one of five Minnesota branches and it serves as the central headquarters for money sent from the other locations across the country.

Wednesday's raids come as local Somalis anxiously await the outcome of a federal investigation into the recruitment of young Somali men in the Twin Cities for terrorist training for here and abroad.

That probe became public in November after Shirwa Ahmed, a 27-year-old college student from Minneapolis, blew himself up in Somalia in an October attack killing up to 30 people.

Over the past few months, more than a dozen people within the Somali community of Minneapolis have been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury. On Wednesday, the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), another terrorist brotherhood organization, announced that it had sent letters to area Islamic controlled high schools, colleges, and universities asking that they provide legal support and assistance to Somali students who have been questioned on campus by FBI officials.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One by one, a step at a time, Islam will dominate the American culture just as they have been doing in Western Europe. Just has they did in Lebanon, just as they did in Indonesia, and in every African nation and every Middle Eastern Nation, just as they have done in every nation around the world that is now an Islamic State. It is inevitable? Yes. Because of this reason---

“If one continues to travel East, one is most certain not to reach the North Pole”...

Read your history book…

de Andréa

Monday, April 13, 2009

Al-Obama’s Nazi Youth Brigades

If you would like to know just what Obama was organizing as a communal organizer in Chicago then you really, really need to read this.

By de Andréa

If you are a regular reader of mine, you may recall an article I published on September 12, 2008 titled “Obama’s Muslim Terrorist Training Camp For Youth”. If not, read it and weep. In it, I predicted “Hitler-type Youth Brigades” if Obama was elected president. Well guess what? Here they are…

Please watch all the videos they are worth while. .

Secretly dubbed the 'GIVE ACT' which stands for (Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education), Obama is creating youth brigades across our country.

I can’t decide whether Obama is a Communist a Nazi or a Muslim. Maybe he is all three. One thing is certain, he is not an American. Let me know if you agree after you read this and watch the videos of the brainwashing of our children.

“Americorps” the American Nazi Youth Brigade
Supporters of an Americorps expansion plan pending in Congress laud its efforts to "leverage" federal dollars to boost state, local and other resources to "address national and local challenges," while critics say the fine print in H.R. 1388 secretly would create a Hitler-styled army of Nazi youth brigades or an organization modeled after Saul Alinsky's communist' Peoples youth Organization.'“ So which is it? Does it really matter?

In an era in which Congress can approve thousands of pages of legislation spending hundreds of billions of dollars without even reading the proposal, there seems to be no definitive answer on what some of the vague language of H.R. 1388 means.

But there is enough in the "GIVE ACT," now awaiting a conference committee in Congress after being approved by both the U.S. House and Senate, to cause its critics bones to shudder.

For example, it certainly imposes a requirement for public service on some people, even though its original much-feared study on mandatory service for all was moved to another bill during congressional debate.

The latest version includes a "National Service Reserve Corps" whose members have completed a "term of national service," "has successfully completed training" and "complete not less than 10 hours of volunteering each year."

It also raises First Amendment issues over its limitations on what various corps participants are allowed to do. Read the Bill It states, those in an "approved national service position" may not try to influence legislation, engage in protests or petitions, take positions on union organizing, , engage in partisan political activities, or, among other issues, be "engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization." In other words they lose all if their constitutional rights.

But probably the biggest red flag for many is how the proposal fits into the overall picture painted by President Obama when he described to a Colorado Springs audience a "National Civilian Security Force" that he wants as big and well-funded as the U.S. military – a staggering suggestion that would involve hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Of course what is not taken into account is the fact that Obama plans to nearly abolish the nation’s regular military in order to fund his own private “Youth Military

WorldNetDDaily reported when the bill began its quick trip through Congress, and its original language called for a study of how best to implement a mandatory national service program for the youth of the United States.

Later the language was dropped from that bill, only to appear at the same time in another legislative proposal.

Everybody means the roughly seven million people called to public duty in the $6 billion National Service effort, But members pressed into the service of the one million-strong Youth Brigade, sanctioned by 'Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education (GIVE),' will have none of the freedoms of the community organizer who started it all.

There's no room for God in Obama's long promised Youth Brigade, not the Christian God anyway, no room to protest, petition, to boycott or to support a strike, and loopholes to give its mandatory membership a pass,. Obama's plan requires anyone receiving school loans, among others to serve at least three months as part of the brigade.

One section of the program is to introduce "service learning" as "a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency."

The plan suggests immediately raising the participation in such programs from 75,000 now to 250,000.

Gary Wood at said it's part of Obama's plan to set up national service. He noted the explanation offered by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel: "It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation, and community service." In other words forced into Obama’s youth brigade and indoctrinated into the new world government of Islam.

Gary Lester, writing at All American Blogger, put into words the worst fears of opponents. "Hitler knew that if you control the youth, you control the future. I wrote about him in 'The Threats to Homeschooling: From Hitler to the NEA.' As I noted in that article, Hitler said: 'The Youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled.'"

He cited the Hitler Youth's launch in the 1920s. In 1933, the participants totaled 100,000, and in 1939 the membership was compulsory for those over 17. Two years later, the membership was compulsory for those over 10, and it included 90 percent of the nation's youth.

He also cited concerns it would steer volunteers away from churches, politicize charity and focus on the "indoctrination" of participants.

"The legislation will, in many circumstances, force our children to participate in charitable activity as part of school – and that activity may well be chosen by or approved by a bureaucrat," he suggested.

At Washington Watch one forum participant warned, "Our republic is under attack as never before.” Said another, "This is social engineering at the very least, and could be the first step towards the reinstitution of slavery! Take heed, the New World Order (aka 'Change') draws nigh!"

When Obama delivered his Colorado Springs mandate and a copy of the speech provided online apparently was edited to exclude Obama's specific references to the new force.

Congress also is considering a "public service academy, a four-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders."

THE BOTTOM LINE: If his Highness the Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah from the House of Al-Obammah is going to create some kind of personal national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this a rather big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible and why is their candidate seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Could it be that His Highness wants a military that has been indoctrinated to perceive His Highness as god, a military powerful enough to control the conventional military?

Watch a video of Obama introducing this Nazi program

This also brings to mind Hitler’s private army, the Nazi SS…

As the presidential campaign advanced last year, other videos appeared that for many crystallized their concerns over such a "corps.” Watch the video It shows a squad of young men marching and shouting praises to Obama. Remember Hitler said: 'The Youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled.'" Watch a video of a school in Southern California already brainwashing the youngest children in America

If you are still not convinced then watch a couple more videos below and see if they ring any bells in your memory.

All Hail the King Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah of the House of Al-Obammah the resurrected Twelfth Caliphate of the World Nation of Islam Yah-All.

No thanks, keep the change…

de Andréa

Saturday, April 11, 2009

The New King of America

Just in case you haven’t met your king yet, I thought I would take this opportunity to introduce him to you. His name is King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al - Saud, from the house of Saud in Saudi Arabia, the custodian of the two most unholy Islamic terrorist Mosques in Mecca the most unholy city in the world. His name In Arabic: خادم الحرمين الشريفين الملك عبد الله بن عبد العزيز آل سعود‎ (You should probably learn Arabic soon)

By de Andréa

No! --- Our Muslim President Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah was not picking up his lost contact lenses or picking up his keys or a penny as Ben Franklin might do. No, he in fact was doing a full submissive bow from his waist to the waist of the king of Saudi Arabia, showing absolute and complete submission to his kingship of the Wahhabist Nation of Islam

If you haven’t seen the video yet, click here.

Now since there is absolutely no question about that, then I have a question for yah-all. Since our King Al-Barry was representing you and the rest of the citizens of America at the G20 Summit when he showed complete submission to his King, does this mean that Al-Obammah’s King, the King of Islam is also our King???

I have to tell yah, I haven’t been this ticked off since I was blown up by an old Mama-san pushing a baby carriage in Northern Laos, hoo-rah @#$%^&* yea, sort of like that yah-all.

If you missed my original article titled Al-Obama Bows to His King then please read it as well. Or read again!

As I said in the original article, it was a move described as a violation of protocol and not worthy of the office he holds. But of course that depends on just whose protocol Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah believes takes precedence.

This exhibition of total submission to the king of Islam, and to the enemy of the ‘Free World’, is so telling and clearly shows where Al-Barry’s allegiance lies.

So far as I know, Obama is the only ‘Head of State’ in modern history or possibly any history to bow in submission to another ‘Head of State’ unless it was possibly in complete unconditional surrender in time of war. You don’t think…Naw he couldn’t have.

What with all the Muslims now in the White House, the FBI and in Home Insecurity, the next thing Al-Obammah may do would be to paint the ‘Dome Gold’ and invite the Ayatollah Khomeini to share his prayer rug. .

Moreover we may just see Michelle donning a Hijaab and holding mengaji readings for the neighborhood ladies in the east wing. Like I said, you might want to learn Arabic.

If anyone in the world cannot see that the Twelfth Caliphate of Islam Al-Barrack bin Hussein Al-Obammah of the house of Obammah is not a Communist Muslim then they have been totally deceived by the Islamic satanic spirit of the Taqiyyah. Besides, the man cannot even find his birth certificate.

If you say, well I need more proof, then proof is not what you need my friend. What you might need is an exorcist.

As I always say, if one continues on a road to the ‘East’ one is certain not to get to the ‘North Pole’.

You might want to get familiar with the new flag, of the United States of Islam.

I think while I wasn’t looking Islam must have taken over the world. Yes Israel too they have Muslims in their Parliament as well.

Didn’t you know that is their agenda???

As I said you really, really need to learn Arabic. You might want to join the mengaji with Michelle and the ladies in the east wing.

And don’t forget your Hijaab and oh! Your Quran

de Andréa