Friday, December 29, 2006


by de Andréa

If our electorates were cognizant of the contents of this article; more importantly if they cared enough about it to put it back into practice, it would turn this country around, and put it back on its original vestige of the aegises of liberty. Moreover, the future of this Free Nation, just may be preserved for our grandchildren, and future generations.

I am going to wax a little philosophical now, so bear with me please.

The only purpose of law in a Free Nation is to protect our God given inalienable rights. There are no gray areas. If a law does not protect a right of a free citizen, it then infringes upon it, and has no place in a free society. Not so long ago, this was the goal of the Constitutional Architects of America. However, because of the bane incremental destruction of our Constitutional rights by our own Federal, State, and Local governments, the Architects would not even recognize this Nation today as their own design.

We have a Congress with an insatiable need to pass laws; any law, especially if it restricts something, controls someone, or takes something away from someone. It has become a tool of power instead of protection. Moreover, a Supreme Court that has blatantly violated the very Constitution that it is charged with protecting, it is illegally legislating unconstitutional laws from the bench, as opposed to doing its definitive job of upholding Constitutional Law and protecting the rights of free citizens.

Any law that violates Constitutional Law is no law and should not be enforced by any law enforcement officer or upheld by any court,” John Jay 1st Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court, (1789). “All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) An incredible contrast to what we have today, our Supreme Court is making rulings that are blatantly in violation of the Constitutional rights of all U.S. citizens.

The existence of a people and or property precedes the existence of law, so the function of law is only to guarantee their protection. Law requires the use of force, and consequently should be used only where force is necessary to protect the rights and property of a free people. This is justice and the purpose of law.

Every individual has the right to use force for lawful self-defense. It is for this reason, that the collective force may lawfully be used, which is only the organized combination of individual forces, and cannot legitimately be used for any other purpose. Law is solely the organization of the individual rights of self-defense, which preceded the existence of law.

The legislator does not have absolute power over persons or their property; the existence of persons or property preceded the existence of the legislator and so his function is only to protect their safety. It is not the purpose of law to regulate our thoughts, wills, beliefs, education, religion, opinions, businesses, or pleasures, or any God given right. The purpose of law is to protect the free exercise of these rights, and to seek legal punishment of any person or organization that interferes with the exercising of these rights.

Another misconception is that the purpose of law is the prevention of crime, the truth is, that law is not meant to prevent crime at all, it only defines the wrongdoing. One might believe the concept of more laws less crime, if that were true we would not have crime in this country at all. We have more laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances, Local State and Federal on the books in The U.S. than the rest of the world combined. In fact, the opposite is true, if there were no law, there could not be any crime, because without law we would not define the action as a crime. This does not mean however, that there would be no wrongdoing.

In a free society, one should be able to do anything one would wish to do, hence the meaning of freedom, and to be liberated. If one cannot, one should question whether one truly lives in a Free State. Of course, there is always the proverbial exception. In this case, one should consult the basic law of freedom, what without, all freedom would self-destruct through chaos. The law of freedom says that in a Free State one can do anything one wants to do unless it encroaches, infringes, or denies another person their freedom to exercise their rights. If our legislators would use this basic law as a guide for all laws, we certainly would not be sailing off into an oppressive society.

One only needs to ask the question. Is our system of law and government still effectively doing its definitive job of protecting our inalienable rights? Or, are our elected legislators and appointed Judges using their power to incrementally and diametrically dismantle the original design and philosophy of what the architects worked so diligently to construct? Havegently to we reached, or will we soon reach the point in our history where we will have to say to ourselves, America may still be a free nation by comparison, but it is no longer definitively a free nation.


The Constitutional Architects of America were not irrational extremists or a product of ancient times that are not relevant in today’s world. Quite the contrary, these Pre-American patriots were philosophical Idealists that not only had the ability to understand history but had the foresight to document the establishment of a society that would be protected from the reprise of the past, for all the rest of time.

The documentation of ones rights was to serve as a permanent reminder that this is a Free Nation, unique in everyway; moreover, it was to establish our own history of protected liberty by putting pen to paper. The U.S. Constitution was never meant to be a temporary philosophical essay.

The incremental disestablishment of America’s rights not only leads to crime and chaos but will ultimately pilot this liberated Nation back into oppression and tyranny. We will have come full circle in our history, all because we have lost sight of our history, and the purpose and philosophy of law.

The irresponsibility of the Citizenry of this Country to abandon the legislators to seek their own direction in government, is leading to an ever increasing cogency of the perversion that takes place when a government is left up to its own volition.

This Country, according to the documentation of our Forefathers was, and is unlike any country on this earth, to be a government by, and for the Free People of this Nation, but it is sadly moving surreptitiously toward an independent power.

As mentioned earlier, the purpose of law is only to protect the inalienable rights of its citizens. I challenge anyone to point to a law that was passed by our electorate in the in the previous 100 years that meets that criteria. That is, any law that upholds supports and or strengthens our rights, liberty, and freedom. If one cannot be found, this means that every piece of legislation that has been signed into law in the passed 100 years has been to restrict disable or to totally defeat our God given rights of freedom and liberty. How many rights do you think we have left, before we can no longer call ourselves a Free and liberated Nation?

THE BOTTOM LINE: The most basic right we have as human beings is the right of self defence. The preservation of one own life is not only a basic human right but is a basic human instinct. The new philosophy of the liberal left is to create a dependent society, one in which the citizens will learn to depend on government for ones every need, no matter what the cost, even if it is at the expense of freedom and the demise of innocent human lives.

de Andréa

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

A Christian Beaten

Islam’s Agenda

A Christian Beaten for “Polluting"a Public Drinking Glass

Brought to you by The Voice of Martyrs.

Nasir Ashraf, is a Christian stone mason, and was brutally attacked by Muslims just outside Lahore.

While working on the construction of a room at a school near Manga Mandi in Pakistan, Nasir took a break after becoming thirsty. He drew water and drank from a glass chained to a cemented public water tank next to a mosque, which was reserved for poor people. Returning to the construction site, a Muslim man asked him, “Why did you drink water from this glass since you are a Christian?” The man accused Nasir of polluting the glass. The Muslim man yanked the glass off the iron chain, broke it, and threw it in a garbage can. The man summoned other Muslims to the scene, furiously saying, “This Christian polluted our glass.” Hearing this, the incensed mob began beating Nasir, yelling that a Christian dog drank water from their glass.
The Muslims encouraged bystanders to beat Nasir because according to the Quran it would be a “good deed that would benefit them in heaven” The attackers pushed Nasir off a ledge onto the ground. The impact of the fall dislocated his shoulder and broke his collar bone in two places. This knocked Nasir unconscious and he did not regain his senses until he awoke in a clinic.

This reminds me of America several decades ago when in the south, this was common treatment of black Americans in similar circumstances. Only then, it was because of Ignorance, the way Nasir was treated by the Muslims is because of an agenda. This agenda can be found in Islam’s unholy book, the Quran. This kind of treatment of anyone, anywhere, anytime, who is not a Muslim, is ordered by their god Allah. Christians are referred to in the Quran, as, The Children of the Book, and are to be converted to Islam or made a slave, or killed. Nasir was obviously protected by his God Jehovah or he most certainly would have been killed.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This agenda is the same for Muslims in America; it is just a matter if time. When Islam has, as they have in Europe, achieved a formidable population, they will continue to carry out this same agenda right here in the United States, as they have all through history, anywhere, anytime, and everywhere else on this earth. We were ignorant decades ago when we practiced a similar atrocity, and we are ignorant today of what Islam is and who the Muslims are. Moreover, unlike America, Islam will never change; NEVER, we are fools if we think otherwise...

de Andréa

Friday, December 22, 2006

Illegal Alien Statistics

From the L.A. Times

Edited and formatted by de Andréa

Illegal Aliens are a foreign invasion of America. According to the U.S. Constitution the Federal Government is charged with protecting this Nation from any kind of a foreign invasion, whether it is Military, Economic, or a Citizen invasion.

1. 40% of all workers in L.A. County (L.A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. This was because they are predominantly illegal aliens, working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens
3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens
4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County alone are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal aliens.

9. 21 radio stations in L.A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L.A. County 5.1 million people speak English. 3.9 Million people speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people in L.A. County).

From the bureau of statistics:

Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare. Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from the invasion of Illegal aliens.

The cost of this illegal invasion, to the American taxpayer in 1997 was, (after subtracting taxes immigrants pay), a NET $70 BILLION/year, [Professor Donald Huddle, Rice University]. The lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services used) for the average adult Mexican immigrant is a NEGATIVE number.

29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens. If they can come to this country to raise Hell and demonstrate by the thousands, WHY can't they take charge over the corruption in their own country?

On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched, and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."

Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more.

Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Moreover, that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so?

According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members, 98% of which are Mexican and Asian illegals

According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of the legal alien invasion from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households nationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces.” Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.

Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."


I remember hearing about the legal immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breathe free. They wanted to become Americans. Now, illegal aliens come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges ... affirmative action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their own culture, and dilute American culture.

THE BOTTOM LINE: These statistics alone do not begin to show the long term damage that the U.S. Federal Government has done to America, its Heritage, its Culture its Economy, its Freedom, its Rights, its Safety, and much more too far reaching to even comprehend, all because of the selfish Globalist Theocracy of a few liberal extremists bent on advancing their agenda of Global socialism, at the expense of the liberty of American Citizens. This is the result of ignoring the very foundation of a Nation once founded on the principals of fairness, hard work, law, responsibility, freedom, and inalienable rights. These can all be found in the U.S. Constitution along with the legal responsibility of the U.S. Government to protect this Nation from a foreign Invasion that would seek to destroy the very fabric of this last and only free Nation on this planet.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 16, 2006


By de Andréa

According to the Jerusalem Post, the French military protecting Lebanon will fire on Israeli reconnaissance planes flying along the Israeli Lebanese border.

The French Islamic Military Is in charge of the so-called multinational U.N. peace keeping force protecting the terrorist organization known as Hezbollah of the Nation of Islam, from any further attack by the Israeli defence forces.

The French continue to defend this Islamic terrorist group in Lebanon, despite the continued violation of a U.N. order to release the two IDF soldiers kidnapped by Hezbollah last July.

The Post said that France has deployed a squadron of drone aircraft along the border to gather intelligence, and is prepared to shoot down any Israeli AF flights that they regard as a threat to Lebanon. The Israelis regard these recon flights as necessary to ensure that Hezbollah does not violate the terms of the cease fire.

If one didn’t know any better one would have to regard France as unofficially declaring war on, or at the very least threatening Israel, while defending the terrorist Nation of Islam, safely from behind the skirts of their Mother the U.N. I can’t help wondering if they will shoot and then run, or if they will run first, and then shoot. Or will they just run??? In any event, it is very French.

I find it, if nothing else, at least a little unfair that no matter what Israel does; it is condemned by the U.N… As far as I can see, all that Israel really wants is a little piece of the patch of land that used to belong to their ancestors, and was returned to what was left of them after the Holocaust of the Second world war by the U.N. in 1948. However since then, the Nation of Islam with the help of the U.N., Germany, Russia, and France has been trying to take it away from them yet again a piece at a time. Historically this land had never belonged to the Lebanese or the Palestinians, it was called the land of Canaan during the time of the Exodus from Egypt and the reign of Ramses II: in, or about the middle of the 12 century BC in Biblical history Canaan was called the land of the Giants.

The so-called Palestinians are actually Jordanian terrorist exiles and have never historically occupied that land, the area known as Gaza was during the Biblical time of Judah and the Israeli occupation, occupied by Philistia or the Philistines, the sea people, they are believed to have come from the Island of Caphtor, the historical Island of Crete in the Mediterranean Sea, driven off the island by famine. Moreover they have absolutely no relation to the so-called Palestinians. Palestine was never a Nation, it was just an area. Just as there is no Nation of Saharans living in the Sahara, or Sinians living in the Sinai, there were never any Palestinians living in Palestine. Even Canaan was not an organized country; it was occupied by City States, among them the largest was Hazor; of less than 40,000 people, the Fortress- City of the Canaanites, which later became King Solomon’s Royal Garrison.

No where in history was there ever a race of people or a Nation called Palestine, from before the Exodus through the establishment of Israel, to the Babylonian Empire, to the return and the reconstruction period, to the Roman Empire. And yet for some unknown reason we recognize the Palestinians, and give these exiled Jordanian Islamic Terrorists credence, even most of modern Lebanon was part of the land of Canaan originally occupied by the Nation of Israel a hundred or so miles north of Damascus in Syria, and as far north as Kadesh, in what is now Lebanon, the coastal land was occupied by the Phoenicians. Moreover, Judah of Israel stretched south to the southern end of the Dead Sea to the territory of the Amalekites just north of Egypt, and from the Jordan river valley, to the Gaza Strip.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one would simply read their history book one could easily see that Israel is not trying to be hoggish and demand all the land of their ancestors, all they want is just a little slip of this earth in the vicinity of their ancestry to call their own and live in peace. But instead they are attacked, and threatened by a mythical ancestral people who call themselves Palestinians that wine about their mythical ancestral land that did not even exist in history. Even Lebanon did not exist until after the occupation of Phoenicia and Syria by the Roman Empire beginning in about 64 BC.

Why doesn’t the world give these otherwise peaceable Israeli people a break? They have been conquered numerous times, enslaved numerous times, separated, and spread all over this earth, nearly exterminated and then almost 70 years ago now, were given this little slip of land and still, they are scorned, attacked, blown up, kidnapped, and then they are forced to give up some of what little land they have. I do believe that England and America are the only true friends these people really have. The Jews have among the oldest history of any people alive today; most certainly in that region of the world. They deserve to live in their land, and to live their lives, and to be left alone to live in peace.

It seems to me that I must have read somewhere in an old dusty history book, that France once supported America in their quest for peace and liberty. I believe they even gave America a statue so that we wouldn’t forget. Moreover, if memory serves me correctly I think that we liberated the French from Nazi tyranny, not so long ago. I guess France must have forgotten; I hope America doesn’t forget as well.

de Andréa

Thursday, December 14, 2006


By de Andréa

Isn’t it interesting that when some of us read; whether it is a text book, a novel, the Bible, or the Constitution, and despite what is written, we are cognizant only of what we want to perceive is written.

A prime example if this phenomenon is the First Amendment, the first part of article 1 of the Bill is, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”…Commonly referred to as THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE. The interesting part is, that there is an ever growing blindness to the second, and just as important part of that protected right, known as THE EXERCISE CLAUSE. …”or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”… Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion, as well as a law to establish a national religion.

George Masson, the architect of the Bill of Rights was no one’s fool. When he wrote that part of the first Amendment, which was to prevent government from controlling religion as it had done so often in the past, Masson included the right of exercising ones religion to place balance in the law. Moreover, if one will notice it reads free exercise not just exercise, otherwise one might interpret it to mean limited exercise.

Not only is the government ordered to stay out of our religious beliefs, but is prohibited from the interfering encroachment of freely exercising our religion. As with all of our rights as human beings and Free Americans our rights do not come from the Government or the Constitution, but as it is written in the declaration they come from our creator. The Constitutional Amendment is just the written documentation of what the right is. Moreover, it does not guarantee the right; the right is not only given to us by our creator but it is also guaranteed by our creator.

This is what the Constitutional Framers knew to be true, and so the document was written with that discipline as its foundation. This is why no one, including any government can change, alter, modify, or otherwise deny one their rights.

While one cannot be forced to adopt any kind of religious belief, one equally cannot be denied the right to freely exercise ones own beliefs. To freely exercise means publicly as well as privately, if this were not true then it would be a limited exercise not a free exercise. To display the Ten Commandments in a public school does not mean that it is a violation of the establishment clause. If in fact the U.S. Government forced or even endorsed the display of a religious belief it would be a violation, but if it is freely expressed then it is upheld by the exercise clause.

Nativity scenes at Christmas or Menorahs at Hanukkah, A cross on a church or a grave, a crescent star on a mosque, a Star of David on a synagogue or in a window, a religious symbol displayed on clothing or on ones automobile is-free exercise, whether it is displayed in public or private. Saying the rosary or praying or reading ones holy book on public property, is free-exercise. Even in government buildings the display of the Ten Commandment in our Courts, the very foundation of law around the world is built on the Ten Commandments, and the government buildings belong to the free people, who’s right it is to freely exercise their beliefs.

As long a the Congress itself does not pass a law establishing a religious doctrine then the people have the right to the free exercise of their various beliefs, freely, in public or private.

The First Amendment does not constitute a separation of Church from State with respect to the free exercise thereof; it prevents the State from making laws respecting any religion. In other words there is not a Separation Clause in the first Amendment or any other Amendment for that matter, or in the entire Constitution or any other U.S. Government document legal or historical.

As mentioned at the beginning, we are only Cognizant of what we want to perceive. We will choose to read what is not written; and we will choose not read what is written.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The basic law of freedom demands that all laws, legal and binding be written to protect the inalienable rights of a free person, conversely no law, legal and or binding can legally be written to deny a free person of their rights, if this is not respected, then we have lost our freedom, religious or otherwise, and are living under an oppressive tyranny...

Happy Birthday Bill of Rights! Born December 15, 1791 you are 215 years old on December 15, 2006. May you live forever…

de Andréa

Wednesday, December 13, 2006


Are the lives of Judges more valuable than yours???

By de Andréa

In spite of the additional security of our courtrooms across the country, as a result of the courtroom shootings in Atlanta and Chicago approximately a year ago, judges are arming themselves on the job.

Cynthia Stevens Kent, a Texas Judge in the 114th district Court where last year a man killed his ex-wife and son, says “Texas Judges carry guns all the time now, when it comes to personal defence, one must take personal responsibility”.

The New York State Unified Court System has decided that it is ethical for a judge to carry a gun into the court room for personal protection. In Nevada, and Oklahoma, Incidents there, have prompted new rules to allow judges to bring their guns into the courtroom.

A recent shooting in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Reno Nevada Prompted U.S. Senator Harry Reid, an avid anti-gunner, to introduce legislation to increase security in both State and Federal Courthouses.

A potential disaster was averted by Judge Thomas Thornburgh a district Judge in Oklahoma, when he grabbed his gun and held a prisoner at Bay until other deputies arrived. This resulted in the Oklahoma legislature passing a law that would specifically allow Judges to carry guns in the courtroom.

This coming year the State of Kansas plans to pass legislation to permit Judges to carry guns into the courtroom.

If anyone in this country is protected, it is the President of the United States and Judges. In every courtroom there is normally a Bailiff (an armed cop) and several other cops’, including those accompanying prisoners, in the immediate area.

With all the police protection that judges have, at least while on the job, they still believe that they must be responsible for themselves and have the right to carry a gun for their own personal protection.

Now don’t misunderstand; I believe, no! I know, a judge has not only the responsibility, but the right to defend him or her self on the job or anywhere else for that matter. Police, according to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, do not have any more responsibility than anybody else in protecting citizens, their responsibility lies with enforcing the law.

The problem I have with all this sudden interest in allowing judges to protect their own lives by carrying a gun on their person is when has the life of a judge become more valuable or more important than yours or mine? Moreover where in the Second Amendment does it say that only cops judges and criminals have the right to bear arms to protect themselves?

Please correct me if you think that I am wrong, but I always thought that the Bill of Rights was for the people, as the Second Amendment says …”the right of the people to keep and bear arms”… or are the people that the Constitution refers to, just special people? Senators for example, like Diane Feinstein are allowed to carry a gun on their person while they author bills to restrict or ban guns altogether from the common ordinary law abiding citizen.

If judges cannot depend on the security and the police that are all around them everyday, how can the ordinary citizen depend on the police to come to their rescue, and protect their lives when they themselves look death right in the eye?

THE BOTTOM LINE: With all my research into the intent by the architects of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights penned by George Mason of Virginia 215 years ago this month, I have found that all the documentation in the First Ten Amendments were written to protect the rights of the people and not just the rights of government people or any special elite people such as judges, police officers, senators, or even Presidents, and certainly not criminals.

No, the Second Amendment does not give the people their rights; it simply documents the inalienable rights that we have as American citizens; they are given to us, as the declaration says, by our Creator. Every law abiding citizen in America, including people who believe that they are special, as well as judges, yes and even Diane Feinstein have the right and responsibility to …”keep and bear arms”… for their own personal defence and protection. It is the law, moreover it is the same right for everyone.

de Andréa

Link to the story, Judges Packing Pistols, click on this: By Amanda Bronstad The National Law Journal 12-7-06

Sunday, December 10, 2006

The Second Amendment is Unconstitutional

By de Andréa

This one really chaps my hide:

The lawyers for the District of Columbia have decided that the Bill of rights is unconstitutional, at least the Second Amendment is. Well do you know what? I have decided that lawyers are unconstitutional.

That’s right, no where in the Constitution is it written that lawyers have the right to decide anything, including what they can have for breakfast and when or where they can relieve themselves. I am sure getting fed up with these self appointed so-called experts of the U.S. Constitution that have never read the document much less researched the history of this inspired Law.

How do I know this? Because I have read the Constitution and I have a stack of books 18 inches high on the history and the meaning of the second Amendment alone, and I have read and studied them all. Moreover, if these D.C. lawyers would have done their homework they wouldn’t be flapping their gums with so much ignorance.

According to the D.C. Metropolitan Washington times, these Legal Geniuses in the District of Columbia have said that according to the Second Amendment, only Militias are supposed to have any weapons. I will let you decide, it does not take a Law Professor to understand this. Quote, Article II The U.S. Constitutional Bill of Rights, “A well regulated Militia, (comma) being necessary to the security of a free State, (comma) the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, (comma) shall not be infringed. (period)

So, what we are reading here, written by the framers obviously with an IQ somewhat higher than our Washington D.C. lawyers, are, that two God given rights, not Government privileges, shall not be infringed. There is one obviously necessary [right] here, in order to secure a free State, (comma) [because it says so] and that is, there shall be a “Militia” well regulated, and then a second [right], “the right of the people (that is “t h e p e o p l e”, for the lawyers who can’t read fast) to Keep and bear arms”. Then both [rights] are followed up with “Shall not be in fringed. Which means in plain American, ‘don’t even think about messing with this right.

How anyone with an IQ above 30 can misinterpret this Second Article of the Amendments so badly, is a mystery to me, unless one with a purpose, has the agenda to pervert this particular part of the supreme law of this country, or possibly the whole body of the Constitution for that matter. Naw, that would be criminal and un-American, wouldn’t it?

Todd Kim is one of these legal geniuses in D.C. that has had such a difficult time comprehending such a straight forward document, moreover, he has obviously spent to much time learning how to manipulate and circumvent the law that he has had absolutely no time to study Constitutional History, much less the Philosophy of Law. I do wonder though, just what cereal box Mr. Kim has fished his State Bar license out of.

We interpret the Second Amendment in Military terms” says Todd Kim the District’s solicitor general who has told the U.S. Court of appeals that “the city has the authority to ban all weapons”. Really; I wonder if he means kitchen knives, ball bats and finger nails as well? Who does this south end of a north bound donkey think he is. No one, repeat, no one, has any authority to deny a God given right except God. The Law says “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” that means by anyone including you, Mr., Todd Kim.

Anyway, who cares how Mr. Kim interprets anything, he is not a Supreme Court Judge. Moreover, there is nothing military in the Second Amendment, if Mr. Kim is referring to the word militia; first, any second grader can see that the reference to Militia is to the security of a free State and not the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and second, Mr. Kim is really showing his ignorance of American History here, the Militia was never a Government Military as we know it today, it was a bunch of rag tag ordinary citizen farmers (PEOPLE) with guns, that liberated this country from the oppression from which Mr. Kim obviously wants us to return.

The Minutemen was just such a citizens Militia that defended this country’s freedom back in the late 1700’s just as today’s Minutemen Citizens Militia is still defending this Nation from an enemy foreign invasion down on our Southern Border. (Something by the way that our Government Military refuses to do) But of course Mr. Kim wouldn’t know anything about that, because Mr. Kim is too busy trying to aid the criminals and enemies of this Nation by doing his best to create a defenseless oppressed nation out of the U.S. before our enemy even has a chance to defeat us.

If Mr. Todd Kim the District of Colombia’s solicitor general has his way, this country will be completely disarmed except for a few military solders and an even smaller police department, and an awful lot of criminals, this country would then be ripe enough to be plucked by the criminals and the rest of the enemy that Mr. Kim so legally supports with his brand of Totalitarian law.

THE BOTTOM LINE: For Mr. Ignorant Todd Kim’s information, the Bill of Rights is directed to the people not to the Government. The government has no rights or powers except that which is found in the Constitution and or that the people may accord to it from time to time. (Read the 10th Amendment Mr. Kim) The people, on the other hand, have as the declaration says, Inalienable rights given to them by their creator and can be only taken away by their creator. Mr. Todd Kim must believe that he, and he alone, is god, with as he says, the “authority to take away all weapons”.

I have news for you Mr. High and Mighty Todd Kim District [Solicitatator]; I am breaking your crown, and taking you down off of your throne, because a god, you are not. The Bible, (God’s law) which if you were a real lawyer, you would know, says that there is only one God, who has set us free, and has given us all of our rights, and you Mr. Kim, are not any kind of a god. Moreover you would do well to ask God’s forgiveness for the feeble attempt at impersonating Him.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 09, 2006


By de Andréa

You may have thought the Dubai issue was over; Dubai Ports World, owned by the United Arab Emirates whose purchase of ports in the U.S. caused a ruckus earlier in the year, will likely be one of the Security Screening company’s whose job it will be to look for nuclear weapons being smuggled into the U.S. from ports including Oman, Korea, Honduras, and the U.K.

The foxes to guard the chicken coop
On February 24 2006 I wrote an article titled Port Gate, and on March 24, 2006 I wrote a follow up article, titled Port Gate is not over; shortly after that, thanks to the outrage, Congress rejected the idea of having the Nation of Islam, (our enemy), be in charge of Americas Ports, a kind of no-brainer if you ask me, but considering the blind deaf and dumb in Congress, it was a wise choice.

However, now, we again have Dubai Ports World from the United Arab Emirates who has delivered nuclear materials to North Korea and Iran in charge of making sure that Islam does not send a Nuke to the U.S. for Christmas. As I have said many times in the past, moreover I will say it again; our Government hasn’t got a clue who our enemy is.

In the afternoon of Thursday the 7th of December 2006 the anniversary of the attack on Peril harbor the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, and the State Department announced this wonderful program as part of the SAFE port act which also includes the installation of radiation detectors at 22 U.S. ports by the end of this year.

Since Congress overturned the purchase of U.S. ports by Dubai Ports World, Dubai has yet to sell any of those Islamic owned American ports. Is anyone really steering the Good Ship America through the Islamic pirate infested seas of this world?

I feel so much safer now that Islam, our enemy will be looking out for the safety and wellbeing of America. Moreover, I am sure that they will do at least as well as our own homeland security, who is still scratching their heads about how to secure our borders, in the meantime our private citizens are taking care of it, they are called the Minuteman Vigilantes.

THE BOTTOM LINE: We, Americans are dependent on our enemy Islam for oil; we are dependent on our enemy China for the ammunition to fight a war as well as the great economy that we have, and now we will be dependent on Islam, our enemy to protect us from nuclear attack. Islam is by the way the enemy that we are at war with, the one that attacked New York and D.C. For some reason I always thought it was our own Governments job to protect this Nation from its enemy. It appears that is becoming our enemy’s job to protect us from our own Government, someone certainly needs to.

de Andréa

Thursday, December 07, 2006


By de Andréa

Governor Jim Doyle of Wisconsin and Mayor Tom Barrett of Milwaukee, both have an inordinate amount of innocent people’s blood all over their politically correct hands and their offices. So how did this outrages bloody crime occur?
A simple abuse of their power.

Twice in the past three years Governor Jim Doyle with the support of Mayor Barrett has vetoed legislation that would have allowed concealed carry (CCW) Permits for law abiding citizens to defend and protect themselves from being killed or seriously injured by violent criminals. When are the citizens of America going to stop electing these crazy people to their State Governments that have on their agenda to murder innocent law abiding people and protect the gun wielding criminals.

As harsh as that may sound, it is, in fact the bold truth, these ignorant people continue to elect to high office the people with the worst criminal minds in history, (a title of a recent previous article). Both Governor Doyle and Mayor Barrett know exactly what they are doing, unless they live in a vacuum or they can’t read. I think that I can safely eliminate vacuums and illiteracy. That leaves the fact that they do know as well as you and I do, according to FBI stats, by denying law abiding citizens their Constitutional Right to keep and bear arms, violent crime will increase and increase at nearly the same rate of legislated anti-gun laws.

Since these vetoes by Governor Doyle and other anti-gun legislation in Wisconsin’s Capital, murder and other violent crimes have been on the rise in Milwaukee and all through the State of Wisconsin. “Every homicide victim in Wisconsin is a human sacrifice on Jim Doyle’s altar of political correctness” said the director of THE CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AN BEAR ARMS Joe Waldron. Waldron went on to say, “the truth is that Doyle is disarming the wrong people; instead enabling citizens to defend themselves, he has perpetuated the risk of the working environment, for predatory violent criminals, moreover, the Milwaukee murder rate proves it”.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Shame on you Governor Doyle, you should be locked up along with your criminal murdering friends. The blood of the innocent is as much on your hands, as it is on the hands of the murdering criminals you support and protect.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 02, 2006


By de Andréa

I am sure glad that there are only a very few Muslim Extremists, Insurgents, Terrorists, or whatever way or however one desires to be deceived. Isn’t it interesting though, that the world seems never to run out of these very few Radical Murdering Terrorist Extremists. Since before the Christian Crusades, for over 1000 years we still have not run out of the very few fringe bad Muslims, after all there is always at least one bad apple in every barrel, right?

I wish the few gallons of gas in my tank were like the few bad Radical Muslim Extremists, it would never run out of gas. Moreover as when the Catholic Church had a few bad Priests and Cardinals in their Churches, they got rid of them, because a few bad apples can spoil the barrel. Then why don’t we see the [good] Imams of Islam at least helping the Western Nations to get rid of these so-called, very few bad Muslims Extremists? After all if it is true, that there are just a very few bad Muslims it would be in the best interest of Islam to pick out and dispose of these few rotten apples, and if there are so few, it should take very little effort or time to purge this Peaceful Nation of these extremely few bad renegades.

I remember right after November 11, 2001 the preferred way to refer to these few bad Muslims, was Fundamentalists. The definition of fundamentalists according to Webster is a 20th century Protestant movement, emphasizing the literal interpretation of the Bible. I wonder how many buildings these Protestants Fundamentalists blew up or how many thousands of non-fundamentalists or non-Christians they murdered. Maybe they just didn’t do it out in the open as the few Muslim Fundamentalists do, and are the Protestant Fundamentalists still secretly making war on the rest of the world? Moreover, if not, why? What ever happened to these Muslim Fundamentalists anyway, were they replaced with these very few Muslim Extremist murdering terrorist insurgents?

In the Judaic/Christian Bible, Jehovah, the God of Abraham commanded that we shall not murder anyone, so Christians do not, fundamental or not. In the Muslim Quran, Allah the god of Muhammad commanded that Muslims shall make slaves of and or murder all infidels (non-Muslims), so Muslims do, fundamental or not.

Why hasn’t there been a few Radical Christian Extremist or a few Buddhists, or Nudists, or Hindu’s, Scientologists, or Methodists, Philosophers or any other religious group of people who believe in something or someone; making war on the rest of the world; simply because they believe in something different? Oh yes, the Nazis. But of course it was just a very few bad Nazis that tried to murder a Nation, and conquer others, for the purpose of shoving their beliefs down the throat of the rest of the world. Like the so-called majority of the moderate middle of the road Muslims, most of the Nazis were good, loving, and warm fuzzy people. Of course we can’t leave out the Japanese Imperialists, we all know of course, that there were only a very few Japanese Imperialist Extremists that we were fighting all over the Pacific Ocean, and this is why if necessary, we were finally prepared to bomb the Islands of Japan right off the map to stop them. Recently there were a few 80 plus year old Japanese found in the caves of a South Pacific Island still fighting the Second World War, approximately 60 years later, but of course there were probably just a very few Extremists among them.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one is old enough to remember or had read ones history book, one would have found that this is exactly what the media was saying about the Nazis in the 1930’s. “Oh, these are just a few radicals, and therefore not a significant threat”. If at that time, the rest of the world would have read Mine Kampf, the hand book of the Nazis, written by their god Adolph Hitler, the war could have been won before it began. If now the West would educate themselves about this enemy, by reading the Quran, the Handbook of Islam, written by their god Allah, this war could also be won nearly overnight.

I guess ignorance is bliss, however in the case of Islam, just as in the case of the Nazis, what you don’t know, will eventually murder you, if not you, then your children and their families, what’s worse they will curse you for your blissful lazy complacent, ignorance. Isn’t it so much easier just to sip ones Mint-Juleps around the swimming pool, and to just repeat all the rhetorical media disseminated nonsense, that one has been indoctrinated with, through the academics at our colleges, and our Governments Religion of Political Correctness, than it is to track down the truth for oneself???. Of course it is, so go back to sleeping off your hangover, after all your children may even find it in their big bloody hearts to understand and forgive you for putting them through the Hell that you could have stopped if you just would have got of your duff an shook your fist in the face of Satan. Have a quiet and blissful nap, ZZZ…

de Andréa