Thursday, January 31, 2013

Obama’s Civil War

Obama’s Civil War 
Obama Orders 7000 More Assault Rifles For What’, He Says…  “Personal Defense”

Is Obama a hypocrite or what?  This my friend, is actually the definition of hypocrisy…  Will Obama make war on American citizens?  If he gets his way, you bet he will.  What’s more, you had better prepare for it – right now!

By de Andréa
January 31, 2013

Yes another article about guns…it is what’s important right now; it’s what you need to know about your own government and what they are planning to do to you…all of you, not just the gun owners.  As I told you, it’s not about guns it’s about people!

Our Communist Nazi Muslim president is arming his personal domestic “SS” Army to the teeth with what he and the rest of the control freak Nazi Communists despots in his anti-Constitutional Regime call assault weapons.  “Assault weapons should only be in the hands of soldiers on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”  – A quote by…Barack Hussein Obama

Connecting his own words to his actions, what Obama is obviously getting ready for…is to turn the United States of America into a bloody battlefield of war.  Don’t doubt me my friend.  

This is exactly and precisely why the Framers wrote the Second Constitutional Amendment.  It is so (you and me) the ‘Citizens Militia’ as it was known at the time, would be able to maintain the security of a Free State, and so the government could not legally do what they are now doing…because the right of the people to keep and bear arms shell NEVER be infringed upon, it’s the law.  Ask your Sheriff what he will do when Obama bans your guns and his Gestapo SS comes to confiscate them, --- will he support them - or you, the people who elected him?  Your Sheriff can choose, according to the U.S. Supreme Court.   

While the despotic Obama Regime gears up for war against its own people and readies itself to disarm the American public, yet another DHS bid has been uncovered (see documents below) showing that the Department of Homeland Security has recently put out another bid to purchase 7,000 more (full-auto) “assault weapons” to be used domestically, inside the USA – used on who?  Well… who else, ‘on you’ my friend…You are the domestic enemy that lives inside the U.S.

Bear in mind that President Obama is on the record saying, “Assault weapons belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”  Did you know if you held one in your hands, you’ would be considered a criminal?  And by that he is saying that his own domestic army is criminal?  Well of course I already new that…

But by his actions I can only see what he ‘really’ means, they don’t belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of his ‘own SS’ Domestic Criminal Enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons, because…well…American streets will be what???  Well…according to Obama the Fuhrer, the streets will be the BATTLEFIELDS he talks about.

The DHS bid for 7,000 full-auto assault weapons is found by clicking here.  The original credit for discovering this goes, in my best knowledge, to Awr Hawkins at  Another good source is Natural News ,com

In the hands of Obama, AR-15’s are called “Personal Defense Weapons” in the hands of law abiding American citizens they are called criminal assault weapons.  But the most telling part of this insanity is the use of the phrase “Personal Defense Weapons” to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS for domestic use, I can only deduce according to Obama is to be used against us on our domestic battlefield.  However, when YOU hold an AR-15, it’s an illegal “assault rifle.”  But magically, if you hand that same rifle to an armed government domestic homeland security “SS” enforcer, it instantly transforms itself into a “personal defense weapon.”  Or – for them is it really an OFFENSIVE WEAPON???  It can be defensive unless you are planning an attack against the Federal Government, your not are you?

The request for the bid actually says:
“DHS and its components have a requirement for a 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearms suitable for personal defense use in close quarters and / or when maximum concealment is required.”

So there it is, right in black and white: DHS enforcers need full-auto AR-15s which are “suitable for personal defense in close quarters” and for “maximum concealment.”  We are all created equal, but Obama must be more equal than you and I are…

But if you or I make the same claim, suddenly we are branded lunatic criminals by the robotic left and all the brainwashed gun grabbers across America who apparently have absolutely no clue that their own government is arming up for war against them.  Do you see what IGNORANCE does to people?  It DECEIVES them, makes ENABLERS out of them and then DESTROYS them

Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Nazi gun-grabbing Senator from oppressive California, said on the record: “That if she had her way, she would take all the guns from all Americans.  Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,”  But while Mr. and Mrs. America are turning in their guns, ‘roid-head DHS goons are arming to the teeth with full-auto “assault rifles”.  Wake up my friend…just why do you think they are doing this, daaah’.

This is all on top of the 1.6 billion’ rounds of ammunition the DHS has already stockpiled, to make war against the American people as was discovered last year.  What kind of government wants to domestically stockpile ammo and full-auto weapons, putting them in the hands of domestic “SS” agents who have nothing whatsoever to do with overseas wars?  Well, it’s because it will not be used in an overseas war, it will be used to make war on 300 million Americans, that’s what kind of government you ignorantly elected.

Here’s some selected text from the bid:
ICE/Mission Support-DC
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Office of Acquisition Management
801 I Street NW, Suite 980
Washington DC 20536
Troy Teachey,
Delivery Location Code: ICE/AS/NFTTU
ICE Natl Firearm Tactical Trng Unit
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
500 12th ST SW, Washington DC 20536
5.56X45mm NATO Personal Defense Weapon
During the base period and four option periods of this contract the maximum ceiling is $9,800,000.

Click here for the PDF document containing the following text:

The scope of this contract is to provide a total of up to 7,000 5.56x45mm North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) personal defense weapons (PDW) throughout the life of this contract to numerous Department of Homeland Security components.

The action shall be select-fire (capable of semi-automatic and automatic fire).
The action shall be capable of accepting all standard NATO STANAG 20 and 30 round M16 magazines (NSN 1005-00-921-5004) and Magpul 30 round PMAG (NSN 1005-01-576-5159). The magazine shall have a capacity to hold thirty (30) 5.56x45mm NATO rounds.

The receiver top shall be equipped with an integral MIL-STD-1913 Picatinny rail for mounting sights and other accessories.
The fire control selector shall have three positions; safe, semi-automatic, and automatic.

The pistol grip shall be a fixed, vertical pistol grip constructed of a durable material.

DHS admits AR-15 with 30-round magazine is “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters” This government document openly admits that AR-15s with 30-round magazines and capable of fully automatic fire are “suitable for personal defense” in close quarters (i.e. your home).

CNN, of course, doesn’t want you to ever hear that. Nor does Feinstein, Cuomo, Schumer, Obama, Eric Holder or any other Nazi gun grabbers. Even while their own government is arming up with 1.6 billion rounds of ammo and 7,000 full-auto “assault rifles” (plus lots more in other bids), while they are trying to completely disarm the American citizenry through new gun registration and confiscation legislation.  I seems I remember someone in history that did the same thing, I won’t mention any names but his initials are ADOLF HITLER…

The whole point of all this, of course, is to create firepower disparity between the government and the citizenry…  To disarm the People while arming up the government agents who operate domestically.  That so, the people can be forced at gunpoint into doing almost anything this oppressive government demands! (Taking vaccine shots, giving up private property, turning over farms and businesses, eating only government approved food, sending your kids to public indoctrination centers etc.)

In truth, a full-auto AR-15 is an outstanding weapon for self defense, which is exactly why DHS is buying thousands of them.  Nothing stops bad guys faster than a barrage of high-velocity lead aimed in their direction.  Again, that’s why DHS wants these rifles in the first place.  One of these rifles in the hands of a citizen could have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting in a second.

As a general rule, all freedom-loving Americans should want the same firepower their domestic government possesses.  That’s the whole point the architects had behind the Second Amendment, it represents the distribution of power in a free society.

But instead of firepower being equal in America today, DHS is using our taxpayer dollars to purchase thousands of full-auto weapons for Obama’s domestic military.  This is apparently being done under ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).
This brings up the question for another entire article, and here’s the question: Why does immigration need 7,000 full-auto assault rifles?  Ask yourself, is there a Mexican invasion planned that nobody told me about?  Is ICE going to invade Mexico and start a shooting war with the Mexican drug cartels or the Mexican Government?  What?  I don’t think so…

THE BOTTOM LINE: No as usual I didn’t make this stuff up.  As you can see it is all documented.  And yes I did draw some conclusions.  So if you disagree with any of them and can offer some other reasonable logical explanation as to why Obama is building and arming a domestic army to the teeth answerable only to him and at the same time he is in the process of disarming American citizens, then I sure would like to hear about it.

Other related articles

As usual, thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013


It all begins with IGNORANCE, and as you can see, I have displayed just under my banner at the top, the next three steps that one can expect to follow, all because of ignorance.  

By de Andréa
January 30, 2013

I certainly do not want to put the kibosh on anyone’s efforts to fight for the truth and what is right, but ignorant expectations must be brought to light.  I have only the highest regard for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) they are an organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional liberties and God given rights secured by law.

I received a letter from Jordan Sekulow ACLJ Executive Director.  It is about Pastor Saeed Abedini, who is a U.S. citizen and was sentenced to eight years in one of Iran's most brutal and deadly prisons (he likely won’t live more than a few months) “merely” because he is a Christian.

I would like you to read that letter below, and then I will explain what I mean by the title “Ignorance”.

“Dear de Andrea,

After a short sham trial, Iran has convicted American Pastor Saeed Abedini – a U.S. citizen – and sentenced him to eight years in one of Iran's most brutal and deadly prisons – merely because he is a Christian.

Iran has violated Pastor Saeed's human rights, violated its own constitution, and violated multiple international treaties and covenants that it voluntarily and willingly signed.

At the ACLJ, we are mobilizing a domestic and international effort to pressure Iran to abide by its treaties and agreements.  We are calling on the United Nations and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights to directly intervene and demand Pastor Saeed's release.

More than 250,000 of you signed our petition to ask the Obama Administration to intervene, and the White House and State Department responded.  Take action.  Sign this new petition to mobilize the international community.

Jordan Sekulow
ACLJ Executive Director”

As I said, I certainly commend the efforts of the ACLJ as they have been working on this issue of getting Pastor Saeed Abedini freed for some time now.  Moreover, if you would like to sign the petition and/or contribute as I did, you can do that by clicking on the Highlighted Hyperlink, but because I know and understand Islam, their religion and culture, I would never have written a letter with ignorant expectations like this. 

I will address the letter a paragraph at a time
For the most part the opening paragraph is informing me of what has transpired regarding the Pastor, except for the last six words and I quote… “– merely because he is a Christian.”  In Islam being a Christian is a serious offence and isn’t so “merely” as is stated.  The reason I am going to pick this apart is not to decry or derogate the effort by the ACLJ to get this man released, but to point out the ignorance that is typical in the West about the Nation of Islam.  If one is a Christian in Islam one has three choices under Sharia law, the first is to convert to Islam, the second is to submit to the slavery of Islam’s supremacy and pay a tribute called the Jizya, and the third if the first two are rejected, is execution by a public beheading.  This is serious stuff; to Muslims it is not just merely being a Christian” it is about Sharia law.  It is even worse if one converts from Islam to Christianity; it is then an automatic death penalty.  It is surprising however that Iran is actually being lenient, which could be because’ of the ACLJ making it a high profile international case.  Nevertheless I believe there will be an “OOPS” in the near future…another Muslim prisoner killed him, we’re so sorry! 

The second paragraph has to do with human rights, constitutional issues, treaties and the like.  One must understand in Islam there are no human rights, no rights at all, so it’s a non-issue for them.  As far as their own secular constitution is concerned, it doesn’t hold the same level of importance that our Western constitutions do.  In Islam, Sharia always trumps any other law including their own secular laws.  And treaties are covered in their book called the Hadith, the only purpose for treaties in Islam is to deceive the person or country the treaty is with.  They will negotiate hard and finally pretend that they have compromised and got some of what they wanted, all for your benefit, but the treaty means nothing to them.   

The third paragraph has to do with the effort to get Iran to abide by those treaties, which I guarantee they won’t, and to get the United Nations to enforce human rights which as I said doesn’t exist in Islam, or the United Nations for that matter.

And finally the forth and last paragraph is about the petition, and to get Obama to do something to save one of Americans Christian citizens who has been prosecuted and sentenced for violating the laws of a foreign country.  First Obama cannot do much and second he will not do anything unless it puts a feather in his Muslim chechia (Muslim hat) as a great humanitarian or something.

In order to deal with any situation regarding Islam, first one must understand the mind set of the enemy and that my friend is the point of this article.  The Western mind has a difficult time wrapping itself around the religion and culture of the Mid-East because it is totally antipodal to our own culture.  Islam is not only a religion but it is the law and government of the land, it dictates everything from who one prays to and how; to the food one eats, to personal hygiene, to politics and war and on and on.  And to us that is extremism. 

Murder under many circumstances is expectable under Sharia.  For example a father can murder his child if the child brings dishonor to the family by just dressing inappropriately, it has happened here in America in Europe in Canada and everywhere there are Muslims.  Or if a woman is raped she can be buried up to her neck in the sand and then stoned to death.  There is a long list of legal murders in Islam and being a Christian, a Jew, or anything other than a Muslim is one of them. Moreover, wherever a Muslim is, as far as they are concerned, it is the Nation of Islam with its culture, religion, Sharia law, and hate for the infidel.  But if you on the other hand are in their country the same rule applies, but its up-side-down, it is still the nation of Islam and you are an infidel.  Your culture, your religion, and your rights, are in violation of their law, period.

So the letter is of course from the Western point of view and it lacks the understanding of the opposition completely, and therefore has unreasonable expectations.  This is not just that the ACLJ is ignorant, it is the entire Western culture including our congress, treaties for example should never be made with an Islamic Nation, they are automatically one sided, Islam totally disregards them as insignificant and are agreed to, only to deceive the ignorant infidel.  Look at all the treaties that were made between the Israelis and the so-call Palestinians, nearly a hundred.  How many has the Palestinian Hamas abided by?  NONE!  It’s just what they do and it is what they are.

THE BOTTOM LINE : When I read this letter as innocently ignorant as it is, the ignorance and lack of understanding and unreasonable expectations of Iran abiding by any form of humanity or treaties or even their own constitution, just jumped out at me.  In studying the religion and culture of Islam for over 20 years I see this ignorance as being at the root of the problem in dealing with these barbaric inhumane children of Satan.  All this ignorance accomplishes is deception and enablement of the enemy and finally our own destruction, whether it is in Iran or in America.

My prayers and I hope yours, are of course with Pastor Abedini, that God will watch over him, keep him safe, and give him the strength to endure, as well as the effort of the ACLJ to get him released from prison.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Arm Your Teachers

Arm Your Teachers
In the wake of mass shootings and gun control threats from some state legislators and’ the federal government, teachers themselves are going in the opposite direction.

By de Andréa
January 14, 2013 

School teachers in Texas, Ohio, Utah, and Florida and many other states are flocking to firearms classes in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Newtown Connecticut, some vowing to protect their students with guns even at the risk of losing their jobs.

In Ohio, more than 900 teachers, administrators, and school employees asked to take part in the Buckeye Firearms Association’s newly created, gun training program.  In Texas, an $85 Concealed Handgun License (CHL) course offered at no cost to teachers filled 400 spots immediately, forcing the school to offer another class, one instructor said.  “Any teacher who is licensed and chooses to be armed should be able to be armed,” said Gerald Valentino, co-founder of the Buckeye Firearms Association.  “It should be every teacher’s choice.”  If you West Coasters are interested in self-defense training, try Valley Defense Consulting Inc.  

The Dec. 14 tragedy in Newtown, Conn., sparked a national debate about whether to arm teachers, prompting passionate arguments on both sides.  The deaths of 6- 7 and 8 year-old school children led President Barack Obama to promise so-called “meaningful action” meaning-more useless gun laws to increase  gun violence, while the National Rifle Association has advocated an interesting idea, arming teachers and/or placing trained guards in each of the country’s 100,000 schools. 

Just when I think I have figured out how the liberal mind works they surprise me once again with logic like “if a hundred gun laws don’t work maybe a few more will…”  Talk about more of the same failed ideas…  The liberal lawmakers actually believe what is depicted in the cartoon at right, despite the fact that it has never worked.  But if they keep on doing it often enough, won’t they eventually get a different result…well…No!

 Ohio and Texas are not the first to offer no-cost arms training to teachers.  Just days after the Connecticut mass murder, some 200 teachers in Utah underwent free instruction from defense training schools.

Brainwashed liberal critics ridicule arming teachers as a foolhardy idea promoted by overzealous gun enthusiasts, saying it would only add danger to the classroom while distracting teachers from their job of educating children.  All I can say about that is, one cannot educate dead children.  Oh, one more thing, arming teachers has worked wherever is has been tried.  But then liberals get confused with facts.

Some experts say an armed teacher could have stopped the massacre at Sandy Hook; and an armed passenger could have stopped 9/11 as well.

“What we know is that these spree killers are looking for the highest death toll possible.  They look for no-gun zones like schools,” Valentino said.  “It doesn’t make sense that we guard our gold with guns and we guard our kids with hope,” or a paper sign that says come here because we are defenseless…

The Buckeye Firearms Association, which successfully lobbied for 2004 legislation allowing people to carry concealed handguns, is offering all eligible state educators free admission to what it calls “an intensive three-day class where you will learn many of the same skills and tactics used by first responders.”

Guns And The Law
Despite Federal law, Ohio law does not expressly prohibit guns in schools and leaves it to each individual school board to set policy.  Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine referred to teachers as “first responders” after the Connecticut shootings and announced his office would expand safety training for Ohio school employees.

Texas state law allows teachers who have concealed handgun permits to carry weapons into public school classrooms as long as they have permission from the district superintendent.

Despite the hue and cry of some hysterical legislators measures introduced in the Texas legislature since the Sandy Hook shooting would make it easier’ to carry firearms onto college campuses and into schools and other public places where weapons are now banned.

Josh Felker, who teaches the firearms classes in suburban San Antonio, said many of the teachers have told him they plan to carry weapons into their classrooms, even at risk of losing their jobs.  “They are upset at what happened, and no one is going to hurt their kids,” said Felker, who offered the class to teachers for free over the holiday break.  “One teacher said flat out, ‘I don’t care if the law changes or not, I’m going to take it to school.’  Most of them just want to protect their kids.”

The Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy will offer its first “Active Shooter Training Response for Educators Course,” which up to now has been reserved for police officers.

One Texas superintendent who since 2008 has given permission to teachers with handgun licenses to carry a gun in school is David Thweatt, who heads the rural Harrold Independent School District, about 175 miles (280 km) northwest of Dallas.
“First they have to have a concealed handgun license, they have to be approved to carry on our campus, they have to undergo additional training, and they are limited to ammunition which breaks apart when it hits a hard object,” Thweatt said.

He said he decided to allow teachers to carry weapons in class because in his rural district “law enforcement would never make it here on time” in case of an emergency.  “When seconds count, the police are minutes away”.

Although the names of teachers who carry weapons were meant to remain confidential, their identities were widely known in town, Thweatt said.
Valentino was adamant that Ohio’s armed teachers remain anonymous, citing concerns that local media might reveal who was taking the course.  “The idea is for no one to know what teachers might be carrying.  It would be very dangerous to identify these teachers.  We don’t want to put a target on them,” Valentino said.

Texas Republican State Rep. Debbie Riddle has introduced a measure to require school boards and superintendents to give permission to teachers who have completed the concealed handgun licensing course to carry weapons into the classroom.  “It would have a chilling effect on any copycats who wanted to replicate what was done at Sandy Hook,” Riddle said.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Well there’s a capital idea!  The main reason the liberal Communists don’t like arming citizens, is that citizens would be in control.  You see, the purpose behind gun laws is not about controlling guns, it’s about controlling people.  Moreover they are deathly afraid that it would work, and that my friend, would be disastrous for the liberal Communist control freaks.

So if you are interested in keeping your children safe in schools or anywhere for that matter, then demand that they provide armed personel instead of hiding behind a paper sign that reads GUN FREE ZONE!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Monday, January 28, 2013

The Right To Shoot Tyrants

The Right To Shoot Tyrants
Is the Second Amendment the right to shoot deer, or is it the right to shoot tyrants?

By de Andréa
January 28, 2013

I have written many articles lately about guns and the Second Amendment including what to do when and if they come for your guns.  I received a mixed bag of responses, some calling me a barbaric war monger among others.  I just wanted clear up one very important misunderstanding, first - I did not write the Second Amendment, someone a lot more intelligent than I wrote it.  And second - I don’t look forward to shooting or hurting anyone.  I even walk around an insect to avoid stepping on it as long as it is not trying to move in to my house and take over my life; and incidentally I feel the same way about the government.  But if either one attempts to do one or the other - I will step on it…

And then there still seems to be a little confusion about the Amendment itself, so let me expand a little more about it, especially in this context just in case some of you may have misunderstood that as well.  Here is the text of the Amendment:  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The first thing you will notice is that doesn’t say:  ‘being necessary to shoot a DEER’.  Now I do recognize that this is about all one hears regarding the Second Amendment and I know one tends to believe something, if that’s all one hears.  But as my Daddy used to say:  “Son…don’t believe everything you hear!  Eventually I learned not to believe much of anything I heard, especially from lawyers and politicians and even some teachers.  All the laws and all the rhetoric seem to reference hunting and paper target shooting, and guess what, the Amendment doesn’t say: being necessary to shoot a paper target either.  As a matter of fact the framers didn’t even have deer hunting or target shooting on their minds when the created the Amendment unless it was hunting tyrant politicians and shooting ‘them’! 

The Militia
So let’s once again start at the beginning.  The Amendment is in four parts.  The first part reads:  “A well regulated Militia…”  Now one must at least know a little about history, specifically early American history.  America wasn’t born with a military at its disposal.  In other words we didn’t have one.  Just before, during and after the Declaration was written and sent to King George William Frederick III of the United Kingdom (our tyrant Monarch at the time), the Colonists new that they must have some kind of military, an Army at least.  So George Washington tried to put one together, it was pitiful.  The Militia was already in existence, a bunch of farmer’s shopkeepers and hunters; they knew how to stealthily stalk an animal and strategically get close enough to shoot it before it spooked and ran off.  Some had even fought Indians and had learned to fight Indian style.  The Citizens Militia actually taught the Army how to fight.  The traditional military strategy and tactics hadn’t changed much since the first century AD.  The Militia introduced a whole new way to fight a war, and because of it we defeated the most powerful military in the world and won the Revolutionary war.  

So you see the Militia was the citizen’s army not the government military or the National Guard as is so often ignorantly touted (which didn’t even exist at the time).  More importantly is that the public so often ignorantly believes it.  You see the Bill of Rights is not the rights of the government, as the politicians would like you to think; they are instead the rights of We The People, the citizens, and there is a good reason for it. 

The security of a Free State
The second part is the part that tells you what the purpose of the Amendment is.  The words hunting, deer, or paper target not only doesn’t appear in the Amendment, but they do not appear in the entire U.S. Constitution.  Just because President Clinton once ignorantly said that he believed in the Second Amendment “The right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of hunting,” everyone ignorantly believed that the right to keep and bear arms was for hunting.  So what is the purpose of the Amendment?  The second part reads: …“being necessary to the security of a Free State”…  So why is the Second Amendment necessary?  Well it’s not for hunting deer that’s for sure.  No!  Try this… for maintaining the security of a Free State. It’s not too difficult Dianne!  You see the Framers new the Government wasn’t going to be concerned about the security of your freedom; on the contrary they knew the government would do everything they could to take it away, a little piece at a time.  And if they succeeded in encroaching on your freedom the last resort was that the people were armed.

The right of the people
The third part is: …“the right of the people to keep and bear arms”…  It doesn’t say the right of the government to take away arms or even restrict arms, and it doesn’t just say the right of the people to keep or possess arms, it says to keep and to bear arms.  Moreover, it doesn’t say only bb guns or 22 caliber single shot rifles, it means to possess and carry any kind of arm that the people want to keep and bear.  It means any arm that the government has.  One would be hard pressed to maintain a free state against the threat of a tyrannical government that has fully-auto fifty caliber machine guns by trying to defend oneself using a 22 caliber rifle or a 410 shotgun.  In other words the people must be armed with at least the same conventional weapons that the government has.  I personally would like a tank and a missile launcher.  The Second Amendment doesn’t have any restrictions…if you think there should be, then one must amend the Amendment according to law.  In the meantime I will stand on the Second Amendment the way the Framers wrote it, intended it, for the purpose of defending my Freedom.

Shall not be infringed
The fourth and last part is the most violated part of the Amendment, ironically it is the part that says the government can’t even think about violating or restricting or even infringing on the right.  Our governments have been surreptitiously infringing, restricting, controlling, violating, and encroaching on this constitutional law for a long time.  And that is how we arrived where we are today.  All in the name of safety, while the only way to be safe, is to be able to defend oneself.

So you see the only thing standing between “We The People” and tyranny is the Second Amendment, or what is left of it.

I find it interesting that the anti-American, anti-Constitutional, anti-Freedom anti-gun people who pretend to be so concerned about the 20 murdered 7-8 year old children in a school in the state of Connecticut, are the same people who have advocated the murder of more the 50 million unborn children all across America. 
I don’t know, I just have a hard time balancing the logic on that one; it somehow causes me to doubt their sincerity.  How about you?

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., recently unveiled new gun-control legislation, calling for a ban on more weapons than the original “assault weapons” ban as well as a limit on feeding mechanisms such as magazines.  At least she may have finally defined what an assault weapon is… it apparently means all weapons!

If you’re going to reduce the number of rounds in a gun, where is the constitutional stop for that?  Do you do it at 10 rounds? Seven rounds?  Six, five, four, one?  Or do you just say everything has to be a single shot and not go boom?  When you go down this road of incremental encroachment upon our Second Amendment rights to defend freedom, I think they probably would not stop at machetes or even large capacity rocks.  But that’s the direction they want to go my friend.  Because they don’t want to control guns, they want to control people, they want all the power.  What do you think they are going to do with that power?

We must also be ready to fight against the looming push for universal gun registration.  That would mean that every transaction on guns in America would have to be approved by a federally licensed firearm dealer.  That would mean that Christmas would be outlawed unless all of us got a federal firearms license.  If we want to trade guns or buy one for each other, it can’t change hands without having the universal registration component as well as the registration of all grandfathered guns that one already has.  Moreover it puts you on a list that just leads to the next obvious step of total gun confiscation.

And they didn’t stop there; they are also attacking the heart of the gun… ammunition.  If you can even find it, it will cost you double or triple, it will be taxed like cigarettes.  No more mail order, no bulk purchases, and then the DHS is buying up millions of rounds of hollow point ammo, why?  And then we must have a background check to purchase ammo and then sign for it; this is a de-facto gun registration itself.  It looks like everyone is preparing for war.

So how should Congress approach gun issues?  It’s easy; lawmakers should read the Constitution behave themselves and obey it for a change.

We need to hold our ground and keep our weapons in order to keep our freedom.  Let me take you back to what Judge Andrew Napolitano said.  I thought he made it very clear.  He said, “The Second Amendment isn’t about the right to shoot a deer.  It’s a right to shoot tyrants.  We have that Second Amendment to protect us from tyranny, and as long as that restraint is there, we’re unlikely to see a tyrant take over this country.”

And will all these gun laws stop the murder of innocent children?  Obviously Not!  But overturning the GUN FREE ZONE ACT will…

THE BOTTOM LINE:  As I said at the beginning, I did not write the Second Amendment, someone a lot more intelligent than I wrote it.  And I really don’t look forward to shooting or hurting anyone.  But if my freedom of speech my freedom of religion and my right to defend it is threatened, I will shoot the tyrant that comes to my door to take it away…

…“tis in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter.  Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace, but there is no peace.  The war is actually begun!  The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms!  Our brethren are already in the field!  Why stand we here idle?  What is it that gentlemen wish?  What would they have?  Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God!  I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!--- Patrick Henry speaking to the congress just before launching the Revolutionary war.

Now I hope you understand how important the Second Amendment really is, what it says and what it’s for…  Without it we may as well be living in North Korea

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Is Our Government Paranoid?

Is Our Government Paranoid?

Is our Government becoming paranoid about the citizens right to keep and bear arms for the security of ‘Freedom’; and should we be more aware of what the Obama Regime is ‘really’ doing to destroy it?

Yes it is, and yes we should…

By de Andréa
January 27, 2013

With Obama’s rush to ban all guns from private citizens I felt compelled to write this article and publish it at this time.  Before Hitler declared Martial law and took control of Germany he disarmed the Nation and almost no one saw it coming.

The main focus for this article is a video that I ran across on YouTube awhile back titled We are Preparing for Massive Civil War, Says DHS Informant  ”.  It is a collection of information of what is going on in the Obama Regime behind closed doors.  It is approximately 30 minutes long, so please set aside the time because it is important and well worth it.  No!  Rather - it is imperative…

Bear in mind that while I haven’t researched every single bit of the information on this video, I have researched most of it as well as writing articles on many of the discoveries and subjects depicted in it.  And while it is highly charged, and may seem a little extreme at times, I can assure you that generally and for the most part, it is frighteningly true my friend.

I can only speculate that this DHS informant referred to in the title is the same informant that I receive information from, from time to time through a Toronto Journalist in the Canada Free Press.  If it is, it has proved to be a reliable source in the past.  But if only half of this information is spot on, and I know personally that it is more than that, it should be enough to make the hair on the back of your neck stand straight up.

Below are just a few of the most resent articles I have researched, documented and written that are depicted, eluded to, and/or related to this video.

                        And then

It is self-evident that at the very least some kind of very unpleasant future awaits American citizens shortly, maybe sooner than later, and the worst part is - most of us having never sat in want of anything are totally unprepared for any kind of disaster or turmoil, much less an all out civil war.  But more and more prominent people are talking about this possibility.  And I believe that it is perfectly obvious the Obama Regime is afraid of the American citizen, even to the point of paranoia, but it is irrefutable that the DHS is most certainly preparing for civil war.

I have, among many other things on the subject, read both Mein Kampf, the Third Reich as well as many written accounts of the years, months and days leading up to Hitler’s take over of Democratic Free Germany, and as I said, almost no one saw it coming.  This my friend, is precisely what is occurring right now right here and right under our noses.  Moreover, almost no one sees it coming!

I fear for the unprepared citizens of America, so I have written a small book that might help.  It’s called “A Complete Guide to Basic Preparedness”. And by the way it is free to do anything you want with.  But I’m afraid if you haven’t done anything at all to prepare yourself and your family by now, it may already be too late.  At the risk of being too dramatic I almost feel like I can hear the all too familiar sounds of bombs falling and machine guns firing in the streets while I hurriedly struggle to write this article and get it published.  

Let this be a warning to you, a “Hue and Cry” if you will,   of what is obviously just down the road of America’s future.  Just imagine the possibility of a war right outside your living room window.  No matter how prepared we are, we will never be totally prepared for what is to come.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I would like to say that I hope I haven’t scared you nearly to death, but I won’t - because I hope at the very least I woke you up to the fact that “SOMETHING EVIL THIS WAY COMES”.
Moreover, it ‘will’ be soon, ‘very soon’…

May God be with you my friend and thanks for listing – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Romney May Be Our Real President After All

Romney May Be Our Real President After All
With all the numbers now coming in about all the different types of election and voter fraud, it now appears that Romney may actually be the real elected President of the United States.  I say - we should have a national recount…at least most foreign countries like Egypt are up front about their election corruption. 

By de Andréa
January 26, 2013

A funny thing happened on the way to the Whitehouse - the Democrats said they won the election even before anyone could have possibly called it.  Someone played “Fast and Furious” and flim-flamed the numbers!  Oh Yeah!

Not only are there rampant reports of voter and election fraud, but it appears that this time, oddly enough, some people seem inclined to do something about it.

One of my very favorite politicians Congressman Allen West for example, is still demanding a complete recount of ballots in his 18th Congressional District race, which Democrat Patrick Murphy claims to have won.  A partial recount had West losing by 1,907 votes.  West actually lost 132 votes in that recount, but his opponent somehow “lost” 667.  Apparently, a large number of “vapor ballots” have been floating around, and there are a lot of irregularities coming out of St. Lucie County, where voters actually protested outside the elections supervisor’s office to demand an accurate count, maybe we should have Mubarak supervise it.  According to West’s people, more than 1,000 ballots have vanished from St. Lucie County, and maybe thousands more are bogus.  They hope a complete recount and examination of the ballots might swing the election in West’s favor.  Suspicions were first aroused on Election Night, when at around 1 a.m. West was ahead by 1,700 votes, then with no explanation, 4,000 votes suddenly appeared out of the ether at one time and he was suddenly trailing by more than 2,000 votes.

On the national front, there have been widespread stories of electronic voting machines automatically switching votes for Mitt Romney to votes for Barack Obama.  The reports began with early voting in some states and continued through Election Day.

Recently, a Chicago technician named Steve Pickrum, who worked for the election supervisor, is saying that when he was called to service some voting machines on Election Day, he observed that some machines were not counting votes for Romney at all, instead all votes for president no matter who they were, were registering for Obama.

“On early voting, when I did work on the floor when voters needed help using the equipment, I was able to see the preference of the voter, and every time that I saw a voter vote for Romney, a ‘voter save failure’ message came up on the screen,” he said.  He also said when ‘he’ went to vote, he got the same error message, and told a poll worker, who replied that he should just assume his vote was counted.  He demanded that the worker check the vote record, when they did, it was found that his vote for Romney had not been recorded.  Pickrum said he never saw the error occur when someone voted for Obama.

A poll watcher in Pennsylvania also reported that up to 10 percent of the ballots observed reverted to a “default,” which automatically gave the vote to Obama, no matter who the voter cast a ballot for.

Pennsylvania is the state where Obama got 100 percent of the vote in 59 voting divisions (which is not possible).  Pennsylvania on Election Day also had reports of GOP poll observers being locked out of polling places by Democrat thugs.

Similarly in Ohio, one of the battleground states, 100 precincts reported that Obama got a modest 99 percent of the vote (another impossibility).

Auditor Robert Ashcroft said on Election Night, he observed that the polling software would switch to a default for Obama in about 5 to 10 percent of cases.  He questioned how pre-election polls showed Obama and Romney virtually tied and Romney with a slight edge, but then on Election Day, Obama suddenly got a huge groundswell of votes.

According to one analysis, Obama also recorded much larger margins of support in states that do not require voter ID than he did in states that check voter identification.

Readers may recall information months before the election that voting machines were being supplied by a foreign company owned by George Soros.  Those stories were hotly denied by liberal bloggers and left wing communist sites like and of course The Huffington Post, which have ties to Soros the America-hating multibillionaire.

Then there was the little matter of overseas military absentee ballots, Hundreds of thousands of them, conveniently getting lost and then finally arriving just hours too late to be counted, some were flat out thrown away or ‘accidentally on purpose’ dumped overboard off a ship.  On and on go the discoveries of unprecedented election and voter fraud. 

THE BOTTOM LINE:  One cannot help but wonder if the corruption wasn’t so ramped and wide spread in the Federal Political System, that the real election results would have painted a completely different picture.  Thanks to the corruption now in nearly every department of the U.S. Government…we’ll likely never know! 

I’ll never forget the election in 2000 when a similar thing occered in Florida and the Democrats exploded into all out war.  Bush narrowly won the election, with 271 electoral votes to Gore's 266 (with one elector abstaining in the official tally.
The election was noteworthy for a controversy over the awarding of Florida's 25 electoral votes, and the subsequent recount process in that state demanded by the Democrats, and the unusual event of the winning candidate having received fewer popular votes than the runner-up.  It turned out there was no corruption and the Supreme Court decided that the election stands.

But here when the corruption is obvious enough to grab the attention of a second grader and so massive that it spreads across the nation, the media as well as the passive GOP hears no evil sees no evil so there isn’t any evil.

I’m sure glad my Daddy isn’t here to see this…

May God be with us all and thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Obama’s New U.S. Military

Obama’s New U.S. Military
The Question asked now by recruiters of potential military personnel is:



By de Andréa
January 25, 2013

Not so long ago I wrote an article about Obama’s personal army that would do anything’ he ordered, ‘absolutely anything’.  But what I didn’t tell you is that he is also totally reorganizing the ‘U.S.’ military to fit his personal agenda.  It seems Obama is looking for military leaders, men and woman with absolutely no scruples and no U.S. Constitutional allegiance.

This is so bazaar that I know you will think I made this up.  As usual, I did not!  Here is the source:  Pulitzer Prize winner Dr. James Garrow is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s private English-immersion schools for Chinese children.  Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.  Garrow has also spent over $25 million in the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions.  

I told you that - so you would understand that Dr. Garrow is not known for being a wild eyed crackpot conspiracy theorist or part of any far out political fringe, so when he recently made the following post on his Facebook page, it got the attention of a number of prominent people like me, he said...  “I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test’ in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders.  Get ready to explode folks.  ‘The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.’  Those who will not, are being removed.”  When asked who ‘his’ source was, Garrow replied:  “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”  His identity must remain secret or he will be sought after, to say the least.  Watch a video interview with Dr. Garrow

One must wonder if this had anything to do for example with President Obama’s dismissal of American hero Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis from his post as commander of the Central Command.  The Washington Free Beacon commented on the dismissal, saying:  “Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

When you think about everything Obama has done to undermine the traditional integrity of the US Constitution, the economy, and the military, it all makes sense.  He forced the military to accept homosexuals and then took action on any who opposed that measure.  Then Obama started attacking the military retirement system making a military career less attractive to good and capable people especially patriots.  Then he took action against military chaplains if they stood up for their faith.  Lastly, Obama ordered the Pentagon to issued orders for troops in the Middle East to remove all religious symbolism; however this is only enforced against Christians and Jews, but not for Muslims of course.  Why?  Click on this!

The Obama administration was outraged when American soldiers burned a stack of Quran’s, but he said nothing about the stack of Bibles that he ordered burned at the same time.  Obama condemned the soldiers that urinated on several dead Taliban terrorists and ordered their court martial, but he said nothing about the way captured American soldiers were being tortured and murdered by their Muslim captors.

Ever since taking office 4 years ago, Obama has been carefully tailoring the country and the military to his own twisted ideological specifications.  Once he started making his sweeping changes, many career military personnel including commanding officers began retiring or resigning their commissions, leaving the military to the liberal America haters.  He made sure the military votes in his election were conveniently lost because the troops overwhelmingly voted for Romney.

I’ve been writing for several years saying that Obama has plans to purposely destroy America’s economy in order to create a national emergency and then replace our present capitalistic system with pure socialism.  This would give him the reason to declare martial law and assume dictatorial power and absolute control.  He will disband Congress and establish his own Gestapo style national police.

When I wrote these things, I said…the only two things that could prevent him from succeeding - is the military, because I seriously doubted that they would violate the Constitution they swore to uphold, and fire on fellow Americans and the nearly 300 million guns in the hands of  nearly 170 million private citizens.  But it seems that Obama is actively working towards eliminating both of these last remaining obstacles and when they are gone, mark my word, all hell will break lose, your head will spin with ‘HOW COULD THIS HAVE HAPPENED ’ and America, as a free nation, will be lost almost over night.

Is “1984” just around the corner…it may just be a matter of time; nearly everything is in place to create a “Reichstag” so Obama can declare Martial Law.  So who or what will Obama use to carry out his dirty plan of Martial Law?  Well…as I said the first of his personal “SS” troops are already trained and in place.

In July 2012, the process by which this could take place was made clear in a leaked US Army Military Police training manual for so-called “Civil Disturbance Operations” CIVIL DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS Subcourse Number MP 1005 EDITION C  United States Army Military Police School Fort McClellan, Alabama 36205-5030 . 

Updated plans from the Obama Administration are also outlined in a new manual released in 2010 entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations.  
This document outlines how military assets will be used to “help local and state authorities to restore and maintain law and order” in the event of mass riots, civil unrest, a declaration of martial law, or a Reichstag.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I have said this over and over again: “by the time you see this happening it will be to late”.  The Time to prepare for this is NOW!

When the gun bans come, and they will.  When the gun confiscations come and they will, don’t wait, act now.  If you don’t have a gun’ buy one, if you do have a gun hide it.  And don’t forget about plenty of ammunition a gun is useless without it.

Then I have posted my Complete Guide to Basic Preparedness on my site that you can read, download, or copy - for free.  Even though I consider it basic, it is still quite complete and touches on nearly everything.  It will certainly get you started toward self sufficiency and being prepared for nearly anything.

May God bless you and thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.