Friday, April 04, 2014

The ATF Gestapo Illegally Scan Gun Owner Forms For Gun Registry

The ATF Gestapo Illegally Scan Gun Owner Forms For Gun Registry

Obama illegally prepares for complete gun confiscation of U.S. citizens, this is coming soon to a town near you.  And then watch all your rights and freedoms go away…read this, all of it, this is important my friend.
By de Andréa
April 4, 2014
Last yearGun Owners of America warned that the "ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) is going from dealer to dealer, illegally copying the information on these forms (4473), and feeding it into a database." We've seen, in recent weeks, how this unconstitutional agency is illegally terrorizing small business owners, such as Ares Armor, and raiding their establishments to gather information on their customers, (be sure to watch the video)  in what is part of the plan to create a national gun registry database which can only be used for total gun confiscation.   This is one of Obama’s loose cannons of his Gestapo, and is being done illegally and behind the backs of Congress.
Now comes yet another story – this one out of Maine.
According to Phil Chabot, owner of Pac N Arms, the ATF used illegal tactics to attempt to scan information on his’ customers as well.  He fought back!
Chabot has worked with the general public and various law enforcement agencies over the past twenty-two years and has many federal agents, including DEA, FBI, Homeland Security, ATF and US Marshals as customers.
Though Chabot acknowledges that ATF conducts Industry Operations Inspections every five years (IOI - an audit that all firearms dealers [FFLs] may be subject to, during which the ATF verifies our inventory and is supposed to verify all paperwork and record-keeping is being done correctly and is properly maintained)  NEVERTHELESS…I have previously pointed out that any and all federal gun laws are unconstitutional (this is a must read and be sure to watch the video) since the states never gave any authority to the federal government when it comes to restricting arms of US citizens. Therefore the ATF or BATFE agency, in its existence today, is a violation of the Federal US Constitution. Did you know the original ATF was nothing but a department of the IRS to collect special taxes?  Now it’s Obama’s Gestapo SS…soon they will be illegally breaking and entering your private space.   
Chabot has engaged in numerous IOIs with the ATF that, according to him, are usually "completed within a week." However, he said the most recent audit, which took place in August of 2013, "went on over two months, and it appeared to be little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to create a registry of my clientele."
Under 18 USC § 926, anyone in the Justice Department, including members of the ATF are categorically prohibited from seizing any records or documents other than those constituting material evidence of a violation of law.
Specifically, the law reads:
"No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation."
While the first day of the audit produced no problems, except some corrections that needed to be made on ATF's end, Chabot said that ATF employee Wayne Bettencourt produced a handheld scanner, approximately the size and shape of a large marker, and began to go through the bound book of ATF 4473 forms and attempted to scan all the pages of the documents, which contain over 1700 forms from gun sales and transfers.
Chabot confronted Bettencourt about his illegal procedure and Bettencourt said he has the authority to do it. Chabot said he did not and told the agent that if he were willing to give him a written statement that he had that authority, he would not stop him from scanning. This was an attempt to hold the agent accountable.
According to Chabot, "Bettencourt vehemently refused to provide me with anything signed by him or other ATF authorities, and made the ridiculous claim that the records were the property of the ATF and he could do with them what he liked, and that if I kept refusing him, he would be back with an administrative warrant so that he could just take the records that I am bound by federal law to father and maintain. I again refused to allow Bettencourt to illegally copy my records, at which point he told me that I should be careful not to make the investigation about me, and that 'my license depended on how well I worked with him.' This was clearly a threat intended to let me know that if I did not allow him to perform the illegal activity of copying my bound books, he would retaliate and that my Federal Firearms License was at risk."
In other words, Bettencourt seems to have been extorting Chabot in order to illegally seize customer information, ie. create a national gun registration database.
Mr. Chabot went on to say, that after he continued to refuse Bettencourt's illegal actions, Bettencourt said he had legal investigations to conduct and didn't want to be interfered with. However, since no warrant had been produced, Chabot stood his ground, noticing "that Bettencourt seemed to be scanning chiefly the A&D pages and especially concentrating on every woman and on every person who had purchased more than one firearm in a week."
At that point, Chabot told the agent to stop using his scanner and told the agent to provide him with a list of the criminal cases he was alleging to be investigating. Bettencourt was unable to produce a list.
Bettencourt became angry and belligerent, angrily repeating his previous statements about taking the records through administrative warrants and threatening Chabot's licenses. To the best of Chabot's knowledge, Bettencourt does not have investigative authority to even allow for any type of criminal investigation, as his job encompasses records keeping compliance, not criminal investigation.
Following that issue, the audit seemed to go well. However, when Bettencourt returned on August 16, 2013 to follow up, he demanded Chabot exit his shop, told him to get a good lawyer because, in Chabot's word, "he was going to see to it that there was an administrative warrant taken out on my business ASAP, and that he would be taking my records."
While Bettencourt couldn't understand his own illegal actions and that fact that Chabot was standing up for his customers and the law, he was apparently threatening Chabot's livelihood for not allowing him to break the law and scan any records he wanted to.
Bettencourt returned again on August 29, 2013 and attempted to scan documents once again, and once again Chabot stopped him from doing so.
On October 9, 2013, Bettencourt returned once more and attempted the same illegal action. Chabot said, "I told him that not only was it illegal, but that I felt I was personally liable and ran the risk of being sued by my customers if their personal information, including social security numbers, got out. I told Bettencourt that I would allow the scanning only with a warrant or a signed statement attesting to the legality of the scanning. Bettencourt finally told me that the audit was finished and once again angrily responded that he would not be signing anything and yelled at me that he would be working toward revoking my current FFL's and making sure the application for the FFL for my new location was denied."
Chabot contacted Bettencourt's supervisor in Boston, Agent Linda Champagne, who told him that if the agent didn't get to copy or scan his records, the ATF would pursue the revocation of his current license and deny his application for the new shop he was working on. This is in clear violation of the law.
Chabot says that he has spoken to numerous agents in various federal agencies and they have all expressed concern over the cavalier attitude of the ATF. And why shouldn't they? Anyone remember Waco? How about Ruby Ridge? Fast and Furious? Yes, all of those were the product of the ATF, an illegal and unconstitutional federal agency.
In speaking to Mr. Chabot to confirm the situation, he referred us to his attorney, Penny Dean, who asked us to postpone an interview for a couple of weeks until they have obtained certain witnesses in the matter, which we agreed to do. Our desire is not to make it more difficult for justice to be brought to bear in the matter. However, Ms. Dean did encourage us to report on Mr. Chabot's letter to his Senator, Susan Collins, which is where the bulk of this article comes from.
Phil Chabot did tell Freedom Outpost that he does want other gun dealers to stand up against illegal actions by the ATF for the sake of their customers privacy. I applaud his efforts to stand his ground, based on the law.
Perhaps you would like to contact Agent Linda Champagne and ask her why she would extort Pac N Arms in such a fashion to illegally obtain customer's gun records. Her number is 617-557-1200. While you are at it, maybe you would like to contact Senator Susan Collins and find out why she is not standing for her constituents against a rogue federal agency that is engaging in illegal activity against US citizens.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Hopefully all my readers have already heeded my warnings beginning several years ago - and you have purchased all the weapons and ammunition you will need to fight another civil war.  If you need a few more thousand rounds of ammo, be sure to pay cash and never sigh for it. Above all, never register your weapons or you will eventually be illegally raided just like these business. 

If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family, and coworkers.  The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of a government and its controlled media is to spread the truth.
If you don’t agree, let me know why!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing – Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted provided full credit is given.  

Thursday, April 03, 2014

Federal Gun Laws Are ‘All’ Illegal And Unconstitutional

Federal Gun Laws Are ‘All’

Illegal And Unconstitutional

All of them…

By de Andréa
April 3, 2014
John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Said: “Any law that is not constitutional is no law and shall not be obeyed by any citizen, enforced by any law enforcement officer or upheld by any court.”
U.S. Constitutional scholar Publius Huldah recently explained why all Federal gun laws are unlawful, watch the video. She noted that the first gun control measures put in place in the United States did not take place until 1927, when Congress banned the transportation of certain weapons by government mail, that’s how it all started. We went from 1776 to 1927, 150 years after our founding, when the federal government illegally decided, "We better start disarming the American people," in violation of its own constitution and no one said a word.
Truth be known, the entire Federal government has become criminally unconstitutional.  If after reading this, you think I am an anarchist, you would be wrong, I am a Constitutionalist of the Republic, there is a difference, a big difference.
Huldah goes through the history of the Federal government's unlawful actions to regulate firearms in America, and she points out that when it started, the so-called Progressives or/Socialists/Communists had already begun a takeover, it started in 1913.  I'll also note that the criminal syndicate called the Federal Reserve System and the IRS was established in 1913 as well.  And so it began…
By 1938 the federal government had illegally legislated that gun dealers had to obtain a Federal Firearms Licenses and maintain names and addresses of those they sold their firearms to, all in preparation to what is going on today – Federal Arms Registration and confiscation, and denial of one’s constitutional rights.
She called the letter from the Utah Sheriffs Association "shameful" because it begged Obama not to impose restrictions on firearms by executive order, but rather let ‘Congress’ determine those things.  This shows that the Utah Sheriffs Association has no clue as to what the U.S. Constitution contains.  Congress has no more legal authority to make unconstitutional laws than the president has.    
Huldah then said that "We must make a principled resistance.  To do that, we must learn the applicable principle." She then pointed her listeners to the Constitution itself to see whether or not the Federal government can legally impose such legislation.
Huldah then pointed out that there is a little known fact about the Constitution:
"It is one of enumerated powers only. When "We the people" ordained and established the Constitution, we the people created the Federal government. It is our creature. We are the creator”. The Federal government “is our creature, it is not - our master."
"The Constitution is so short," she continued. “Because ‘all’ of the powers enumerated to the Federal government are listed in it.  Depending on how you count, we delegated only 21 powers to the Federal government." Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1-16 are those powers. And the restriction and regulation of guns, are not among them my friend.
Huldah then courageously pointed out that “all laws made by Congress, any restrictions imposed by the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, any restrictions made by executive order, and all Supreme Court decisions that restrict firearms are unconstitutional. They are unconstitutional because there is no constitutional authority to do so”.  Period!
Let me make this perfectly clear, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution clearly states that The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleDid the states ever delegate the power to violate the Second Amendment to the Federal Government?  Did the people? No, they did not…
God is the giver of men's rights, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the right to defend one's self and one's family is not only a right, but it is a duty and responsibility before God, according to the Bible which among others is a demonstration of our love for others. Therefore, she rightly pointed out that the Second Amendment is not the source of our right. It merely recognizes that the right is to be free from any interference whatsoever to defend ourselves, our families and our communities from attack. “Shall not be infringed”. The Framers said so… "This understanding is as old as human history," she says.  Regulated rights are not rights at all, by definition, they are instead called privileges.

The Framers of the Constitution understood that arms are the only defense against a Federal government that would seek to overstep its bounds. James Madison, writing in Federalist Paper No. 46, said that the reason the Citizens – the Militia – are armed is to defend ourselves, our families, our neighborhoods, communities, and States from an overreaching, tyrannical federal government.  Which is exactly what is going on today my friend!
Here are a couple of things that indicate the Framers of the Constitution understood this idea:
1.     Militia - armed citizens - Second Amendment
2.     Letters of Marque and reprisal - Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 - This gives authority to Congress to authorize privately owned armed ships to make war on the enemies of the United States. An example of such was during the administration of Thomas Jefferson, where a ship was commissioned to make war on the Barbary pirates via a letter of Marque and reprisal from Congress. Also Congress did the same thing against the British.
In other words, the Framers had no problem with the citizens being as heavily armed as the country's Citizen Militia. "That is because they did not see themselves as our rulers," Huldah adds.
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16 gives Congress the authority to demand that able bodied males be armed. It reads:
“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."
In 1792, Congress passed “An Act more effectually to provide for the National Defense by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States.” This Act required all able-bodied male citizens (except for federal officers and employees, for good reason) between the ages of 18 and under 45 to enroll in their State Militia, in other words, get a gun and ammunition, and train.
Publius Huldah then reminds us that the leading cause of death in the 20th Century was Democide - Death by Government watch the video. She ran the list of Soviet run Russia, Communist China, Nazi Germany, Cuba, Cambodia, and North Korea. She pointed out that Communist, Fascist and Islamic dictatorships murdered their own people by the tens of millions. "And do not think that isn't coming this’ way," she warned.
"Universal registration leads to confiscation. Confiscation leads to extermination. It always has. Why do you think they are so "Hell bent on disarming us?"  Or is it as Hitler stated “for your safety”.
James Madison was clear in Federalist 46 that “the citizenry being armed is to fight the Federal government's tyranny”.
"Let's have no more talk of (so-called) 'reasonable restrictions' and background checks imposed by the Federal government," Huldah declared.
All Federal government gun and ammunition laws should be nullified, ignored and rendered toothless by the people of the States.   I refer you to the first paragraph in this article.
Publius Huldah then reference this essay, "The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings" in which James Wesley Rawles says:
“If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably”.
Rawles indicates that the use of masks to hide identities would be proper and to cover dealers, they could claim that masked men with guns forced them to do what they did. Simply brilliant!
Huldah then addressed all State and County officers. She called upon them to support their oath, which is to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, according to Article 6, Clause 3. “When as a representative of the people you acquiesce to Federal government gun laws you are not supporting or defending the Constitution, but rather you are conniving with tyrants against your own people.  And if you connive with tyrants against your own people so that you can keep your Federal funding, then shame on you for becoming so corrupt that you allow yourself to be bribed with money that your grandchildren will have to pay back," Huldah resounded.
She also called upon cowardly representatives who have become corrupt, to resign their office and let “manly men take their place”.
While referencing Tennessee issues later in the speech, she did speak to Federal funding and declare that officials shouldn't worry about "arming their posse because manly men will arm themselves”!
THE BOTTOM LINE: My fellow Americans, the line was drawn a long time ago and “WE THE PEOPLE” have allowed the Federal government to creep across that line stealthily an incrementally over the years. It is past time to say "Enough is enough," stop them and then push them back in place where they belong. Seriously we must resist the tyranny coming from Washington and the tyranny forming at our State and local levels that would seek to restrict our ability to own and carry firearms. Thank you Publius Huldah for your stand and may the manly men and the womanly women of this country take that same stand.
I think this pretty well proves that the whole #%$*&@ Federal Government is criminal…
“Out of my cold dead hands” the federal government will take my guns…
I am a free American, are you?  Or are you ignorantly giving your freedom away to the oppressors?

If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family, and coworkers.  The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of a government and its controlled media is to spread the truth.  I will set you “FREE”.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing – Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted provided full credit is given. 

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

Losing Your Freedom One Little’ Battle At a Time

Losing Your Freedom One Little’ Battle At a Time

When they lose big national battles…they start guerilla warfare in the streets of your town.  Who are “they”?  Read on and find out…

By de Andréa
April 2, 2014

That old lesson has ‘not been’ lost on the Nazi anti-American players behind the gun control movement. Having lost big battles on the national stage, they are now taking their small stealthy battles to sympathetic states and small towns in an effort to pass any possible anti-Second Amendment civil rights illegal infringements they can get away with, all in the name of safety eventually making the populous unsafe and more importantly -- oppressed.

Nowhere is the battle raging hotter than in California
This may be all thanks to a previously uncontested watering-down of the preemption statute in California, (now you will reap what happens when you say nothing and do nothing) San Francisco’s history as an illegal gun ban test pilot, big money PR campaigns, and self-promoting criminal politicians such as California state Senator Leland Yee recently indicted for gun running to the enemy, and using the issue to build name recognition to help them win elections.  California is easy prey for the Nazi anti-American criminal tyrants.

They’ve lost the big battle, so now they snipe
For now at least, the anti-gun movement has had major setbacks on the national stage. Starting in the year 2000 – when many anti-gun politicians were voted out of office – gun control has become an almost forbidden topic on Capitol Hill. Then in 2008 the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to own guns in the Heller decision. Two years later the Supreme Court confirmed that the right was enforced against states and cities. All the while guns have become more popular and more available. Gun stores joke that Obama is the gun salesman of the year. More states allow for concealed public carry. Shooting ranges are packed. Women are jumping into gun toting in record numbers. And you can’t knock the passionate Country Western singer Ted Nugent off the television screen.

But the gun ban lobby has an ideological plan, big money, PR savvy, and twisted allies. They will never stop. But they do adapt their strategy and tactics in this fight for cultural supremacy.

They pick little battles they can win
In California in particular, the battlefield has once again moved to cities, where passing laws is more a matter of art and local influence than sophisticated political warfare. The modus operandi is simple: find cities with anti-gun council members (even better if they are trying to build name recognition for a run for higher office), add left-leaning constituents, and craft inane but sympathetic sounding laws that appeal to emotions and create untested infringements on your Second Amendment rights. Then lawyer-up for the inevitable NRA legal challenge, and meanwhile try to spread the laws like butter over every other possible city (or state). Including yours.

The anti-Constitutional Supreme Court
It is a sound and dangerous strategy. And they have used it before in California. Knowing they have no chance of national success, the gun control movement is creating test beds at state, county and local levels. Their hopeful build-a-critical-mass legal strategy is legally “justified” based in part on the commentary contained in a footnote in the Supreme Court’s Heller decision concerning the right to keep arms, namely where the majority wrongly suggested that not all regulation of arms was prohibited (even though the Constitution says it is) leaving the door wide open for the incremental erosion of our freedom. Gun control money is now backing a barrage of new laws in every viable jurisdiction in order to find something … anything … that will stick. And Heller’s footnote number 26 is the centerpiece of their legal justification (“26: We identify these presumptively lawful regulatory measures only as examples; our list does not purport to be exhaustive.”)  The Supreme does what is politically correct rather than what is legally correct. 

This creates a number of horrible problems for fans of a Free America in the future.

Test beds breed ugly children:
Something may stick. Some law in some backward berg or overrun battleground state may be permitted by some future (Obama packed anti-Constitutional) Supreme Court. It may be an extra capacity magazine possession ban. It may be a waiting period. It may concern so called ugly “assault weapons,” or “high capacity” magazines, or “offensive ammunition” like Homeland Security is buying up by the ton to be used against us, or whatever gun or gun part they wish to demonize and ban. They know that once they start the process of banning “Saturday Night Specials,” then all they have to do is demonize and ban “Friday Night Specials.” Then “Thursday Night Specials,” etc. At the end of the week, there’s nothing left and we ignorantly look back and wonder what happened to our freedom and when did it happen.

But it’s not a “ban.” It’s just a “common sense” “regulation.” RIGHT?
Bottom line: your rights are only as secure as the prejudices of five judges who now make the law.

Unequal rights … depending on where you live:
Litigation often moves slower than glaciers flow. Even if eventually victorious, there will be periods of time when people in one jurisdiction suffer under these crazy and ineffective laws. If you live in a bluish federal court district, your rights could be infringed for years (for example, the recently wrapped-up Nordyke case was in play since the turn of the century) more than a decade. (Nordyke is a gun show promoter in Alameda County California)

Litigation drain:
Defending your rights in court isn’t cheap (a sadly congenital problem with the American judicial system). By passing a variation of laws at the lowest levels over many jurisdictions, and often having taxpayers at the local level pay to defend these anti-freedom, anti-Constitutional, anti-American laws, the gun control movement is trying to extract a financial toll on everybody except themselves, you pay for your defense, you pay for their offence, you pay, pay, pay.

The Pit of Hell is in San Francisco
This assault on your rights comes largely from the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence (LCPGV, formerly the Legal Community Against Gun Violence). Born from a lunatic shooting by a deranged and disgruntled ex-client at an office building housing a prestigious law firm, this organization has morphed from being an anti-gun activist group into a two-headed monster: one head pushes and defends anti-gun laws, and the other breathes propaganda fire. With deep pockets and by mating with strange bedfellows, this organization is the gun ban movement’s defacto law firm.

The LCPGV started pushing local gun control in the early 90s. Then they expanded into state efforts when the criminal democrats like Yee took over in Sacramento. Then they expanded nationally. Lately they’ve gone back to their roots, spearheading recent California city gun ban ordinances including the “Sunnyvale Measure C initiative”. This package of laws has inflicted magazine capacity bans, redundant locked storage laws, ammo sales control, bureaucratic recordkeeping overkill, and ambiguous loss/theft reporting mandates. Oddly this local measure passed in California, where the state has some preemption powers as far as gun control is concerned. But that is the danger of their efforts – like unruly children they are testing every aspect of every possible prohibition. Some judges may decide that a magazine ban is just a regular law, not a “gun control” infringement per se, or that the requirement to report a stolen firearm (even if you are unaware it is missing) is constitutional.  Which pulls into question do Judges even know the Constitution?  Since there are no gun regulations at all that are constitutional.  Remember according to the Constitution, the “Right Shall Not Be Infringed” in any way.

Let’s ignore for the moment that none of the laws authored by the LCAGV and its partners in crime over the years have had any effect on the largest segment of gun deaths (suicides, 61%) or the second largest segment (felonious homicides, mainly street gang and drug related, 35%). What is most troubling is the very nature of the LCAGV’s perspective on the role of government, freedom, and the individual citizen.

At a recent LCAGV event, they shared the stage with elder legal warriors from the anti-smoking and drunk driving PR and legal campaigns – movements that achieved legislative and judicial success. When the subject of the Second Amendment and basic freedoms came up, one of the LCAGV panelists said “Freedom...that’s the scallywags’ argument.” So, according to the dictionary, the LCAGV thinks that if you believe in freedom of any kind or especially to choose to own a gun to defend yourself and your family, you are a “disreputable despicable fellow”, a “scamp” “a scallywag” or a “rascal.”

Actually we should be pleased with the label, considering that its most recent incarnation was for “White a Southerner who supported … Black emancipation.”
Freedom for scallywags indeed.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So what should be our Objectives?  Litigate - educate - procreate.  First, we should fight back in court no matter how much the Judges look like Kangaroos. Unlike the scattershot mode of the gun control movement, (and even some groups on our side) we should carefully pick our fights to maximize the chances of winning our present and future battles. But there are a lot of battles to wage, and many left-leaning judges to convince or overrule.  But all may not be lost…yet!  You still may be able to do ‘something’ to save what is left of your freedom. Consider augmenting your monthly bill paying routine by becoming a member and/or sending a check to the NRA so we can keep the heat on the LCAGV in every possible court of law and public opinion.

Your first job is to educate – yourself and your connections. Get smart on how gun control laws have failed to prevent violence, how gun rights have created no harm, and how laws like LCAGV’s Frankenstein Monsters will have zero impact on human life and safety.

Finally, take somebody who has never fired a gun to the range. Fear is the primary emotional tool the other side has. But once people have handled firearms and see how their safe and sane neighbors use them, fear vanishes and is often replaced by a sense of empowerment. In California’s Alameda County for example, the local NRA Member’s Council holds four “Fun Shoots” every year where the public can come and try their hands at everything from .22 rifles to those dreaded “assault weapons.” These are sell-out events and nearly everyone who comes and gets coached by the NRA safety instructors, then shoots a few guns (all brought by the chapter members) goes away puzzled by the propaganda they hear from the LCAGV (even San Francisco reporters think so).

It’s funny how the truth will set you free my friend!  So what are you doing at your range?

How long will the battlefield be confined to the courts before it spills out onto the streets???  The question is will the hypocrites and criminals like Leland Yee be ar med?

If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family, and coworkers.  The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of a government and its controlled media is to spread the truth.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing – Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted provided full credit is given.  

Tuesday, April 01, 2014

California Legislator Provides Illegal Arms to Philippine Muslim Terrorists

California Legislator Provides Illegal Arms to Philippine Muslim Terrorists
Will the corruption ever end???

By de Andréa
April 1, 2014

Well’ we all know that the U.S. Federal Government      is totally and absolutely corrupt, but now we are witnessing the growing corruption of yet another state government?
This is California’s third legislator indicted for crimes against the people in less than a year, is it just coincidence that they are all Democrats?  Or is the Democrat party just turning out nothing but criminals these days. 
Democrat California state Senator Leland Yee who is known for his un-American activities regarding the over through of the Second U.S. Constitutional Amendment,  is not only involved in  wire fraud, money laundering, corruption, and bribery, the following affidavit contains tales of murder-for-hire plots involving a political consultant close to Yee, as well as large international weapons trafficking operations.  This supports the anti-American twisted philosophy that only government and criminals should have guns.
The 137-page, FBI-sworn affidavit against California State Sen. Leland Yee, a Democrat who is also (would you believe) running for Secretary of State, and over two dozen other individuals reads like a fictional crime thriller, but this is not fiction my friend, this is your corrupt state government in action. 
Indeed, the media has fixated on the hypocrisy of a gun-control advocate--Yee sponsored legislation against detachable magazines, for example--his involvement in gun smuggling to the enemy of the Civilized world…Islamic terrorist Jihadists, few reports delve into the kind of weapons with which Yee was involved. 
The FBI affidavit describes conversations about shipments of automatic weapons and talk of heavier weapons, including shoulder-fired missiles and artillery.
One arms trafficker Yee discussed sourced weapons from Russia. Another trafficker, in a meeting with Sen. Yee, political consultant Keith Jackson, and the FBI informant on March 11, 2014, discussed arms to be obtained from the Philippines. The affidavit claims the arms trafficker claimed personal relationships with Islamic terrorists rebels in the Philippines, though the weapons were supposedly to be obtained from sources inside the Philippine military.
Throughout the document, a portrait emerges of a politician who is not only cavalier about campaign finance limits but who does business with violent criminals and drug traffickers. 
And it is a rather sad picture: at one stage Yee confides that he does not enjoy his life here in America and wants to live in anonymity in the Philippines. 
The Los Angeles Times notes that the persona that emerges in the affidavit is a very different figure than the one Sen. Yee presented to the public: a local community leader and steadfast advocate for gun control whose efforts were nationally recognized. 
The sworn testimony by FBI Special Agent Emmanuel Pascua paints Yee as a man who used corrupt business relationships to finance his various campaigns and campaign debts.
Another theme throughout the affidavit is the skillful way in which the FBI manipulated the greed of some of the criminals, who push each other into conspiracies for fear of missing out on their own independent opportunities for self-enrichment. 
Though the constitutional presumption of innocence must hold for now, the sheer scale and detail of the FBI's work is damning.
Yee should be indicted for treason against the United States in time of war.  Yee is trafficking arms to Islamic terrorists.  Remember it was Islamic terrorists who attacked the U.S. on 9/11.

If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family, and coworkers.  The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of a government and its controlled media is to spread the truth.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing – Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted provided full credit is given.