Saturday, June 30, 2012

The Supremes Are Just Wrong!

The Supremes Are Just Wrong!
One might think’, no matter how naive it would be, that the Supreme Court Justices would at least know a little about the US Constitution, well they either do not, or they don’t care.  You decide!

By de Andréa
June 30, 2012

This past Thursday the Supreme Court wrongly, that’s ‘wrongly’ my friend, concluded that Obamacare is’ constitutional.  Make no mistake-it’s not.  Chief Justice Roberts using tortured logic and defying the law-the intent of the framers-and the will of the people-will claim it is so.  But again, it is not.

Court House Photo by Evan Vucci of the AP

In trying to figure out just what could have possibly possessed the Supremes in the absolute and total violation of US Constitutional law, I have concluded that at least in part, this may have been a desperate call to action.  Because’ part of the written decision included this statement:  “Members of this Court are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments.  Those decisions are entrusted to our Nation’s elected leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with them.  It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.” As I said-twisted tortured logic.  However, the Supreme Court may have told us the answer even while helping the administration trample all over our rights.  The Supreme Court is however responsible for correcting constitutional ambiguities of the congressional electorate. 

On a personal note; I have never had a lot of respect for the US Supreme Court.  I once challenged every one and anyone to show me when and where the Supreme Court ever… and that is ever in history… did their job and totally’ upheld the US Constitution.  Of the thousands of people that read my column, I received five challenges, and I had to point out that I said “totally upheld” and not partially, no compromises etc.  Not one of the challenges showed where the Court ever did their constitutional job of upholding the constitution totally and/or completely.  Why?  Because they never have…  I mean really, when the Attorney General is corrupt the Department of Justice is corrupt and the President is corrupt and the Congress is corrupt and the Supreme Court is CORRUPT, just exactly what is left my friend?  Who do you go to???  THE PEOPLE!  We are the electors; we can, as Roberts wrote, “throw the bums out of office”, yes we can, remember that’ next election.   

The Supreme Court upheld Obamacare’s individual mandate in a 5–4 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts.  The Supreme Court wrongly concluded that even though Obamacare was unconstitutional it would stand.  Just because a majority of the Supreme Court declares something “constitutional” for what ever reason, does not make it so.  Millions of Americans simply won’t accept it and we must act to overthrow it completely.  Trust me; there is nothing good in Obamacare folks!  In fact, unless you have read the 2700 odd pages of this monster you have no idea what is in it.  There is a lot more than health care in this document, it has the potential of creating a despotic oppressive government all by itself and no real healthcare at all.

The majority of the Court held that this penalty, for constitutional purposes, could be, if one would put enough spin on it, passed off as a tax.  The Supreme Court, by its actions, rewrote what they said Congress actually intended when it enacted the law.  But you see, that’ in itself is unconstitutional; the court cannot levy taxes or make law, only congress can, and isn’t it interesting that congress said it was not a tax when it was passed.  For all these reasons, to say that the “Individual Mandate” merely imposes a tax is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it.  Judicial tax-writing, as well as law making, ‘is against the law’.  This dissent immediately cites and  is reminiscent of-the Stamp Act of 1765 (which wasn’t about postage stamps by the way), and the Declaratory Act  of 1766 Both of these episodes played a major role in defining the grievances of “taxation without representation” and sparked the organized colonial resistance that finally led to the American Revolution in 1776.  In our case it is the Supreme Court levying the tax and none of the nine Justices were elected by the people so the “taxation without representation” principal applies.  I am all-ready for a revolution folks, how about you.

You must remember all those agitations and whining centered on Justice Kennedy as the swing vote Justice.  It turned out not to be Kennedy at all, it was Justice Roberts that scored this touchdown for Obama.  I think really what happened here, is not so much that he caved, but that Chief Justice Roberts is establishing his legacy.  I think it’s what he wanted to do.  I think this is his imprimatur, good or bad; it is what he will be remembered for.  This is “The Roberts Court”, just like we had “The Warren Court” and “The Rehnquist Court”.  This is “The Roberts Court” my friend.  And this is his stamp on it --- it will’ be his legacy.  He well be in the history books.

Obama's ill-conceived government run socialized medicine is and will be out of control.  Unless this is repealed by Congress, Doctors will now practice medicine according to government mandated guidelines or else they will be in violation of the law, and American citizens’ will have the IRS taking money from their bank accounts!  Next we will be taxed for not eating government approved foods by a medical edict.  It just may be Islamic halal food by a Sharia Fatwa, since the Constitution seems to be is on its way out!

All the American families wanted, before Obamacare, was affordable health care and insurance companies that would work side by side with doctors on medical procedures.  One of the greatest improvements could have been to eliminate the regulation against the interstate sale and purchase of health insurance.  So one could shop’ nation wide’ for insurance, the competition alone, would automatically drive the premiums down.  Another could be a limit on court awards in so-called malpractice cases this would also drive the cost of health care down.  Do you think the Doc’s pay those premiums? heck no, you do, through high medical costs and subsequently higher premiums; there are at least a half dozen simple changes that could be made to improve’ and lower the cost of healthcare.

So far, the Senate has voted to repeal only a small part of Obamacare.  They voted to get rid of the tax reporting requirement that forces businesses to file a 1099 for every expense over $600, which would literally drown business owners in paper work.  (FYI Obama, those are job creators)  Thankfully that's gone.  But that's only one small piece of the deficit-busting pie that won't become law. 

Outrageously Obama and the Congress - YES, the same irresponsible Congress that raised the debt to a record $15 trillion, is mandating that the "United States Preventative Services Task Force" rates your medical services.  Many services that get "C’s", "D’s” and “F’s” -- such as screening for ovarian or testicular cancer could get terminated from coverage entirely, or the part where people over 70 will just receive a pill to make them comfortable -- and doctors must comply.  However as long as doctors treat patients according to Obama's orders they will have immunity from malpractice lawsuits.  So this stupid document written by brain-dead bureaucrats will determine medical procedures and your medical care.

Think about it.  The government could order doctors to give patients substandard treatments or refuse treatment all together.  After all, no doctor wants to get sued.  And if you do not comply, the Supreme Court says you will get fined… oh no, sorry…taxed.

Healthcare access will be in short supply, as doctors will be in short’ supply, even if you can afford to find one.  The Physicians Foundation Survey revealed that 40% of doctors plan to drop out of the medical field entirely!  60% said that government run healthcare will "compel them to close or significantly restrict their practices to certain categories of patients.”  That means Americans on Medicare or Medicaid will find it virtually impossible to receive adequate healthcare.  Hey wait, I’m on Medicare, oh well… my dog Cooper will take care of me.  I’ll just call it “Coopercare”, that’s copyrighted by the way and it’s mine, all mine.

And lastly but certainly not least, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan helped craft and defend this communist social healthcare mess while she was Obama's Solicitor General when Obamacare by-passed a final Senate vote to make it law.  Now the court has changed the law into a tax and Obamacare was upheld by the Supreme Court that Kagan refused to recuse herself from even though her vote was clearly biased by a conflict of interest, yet another violation of, if not the law, then for sure…’ethics’.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  The Supreme Court is corrupt six ways from Wednesday; I mean truly, there is nothing legal or correct about what the Supreme Court did in its decision Thursday. 

As I said earlier when the Attorney General is corrupt the Department of Justice is corrupt, and the President is corrupt and the Congress is corrupt and the Supreme Court is CORRUPT, just exactly what is left?  Who do you go to???  THE PEOPLE! That’s who!  We are the electors; we can, as Roberts wrote, “throw the bums out of office” and repeal this monstrosity, “yes we can”, I truly hope that you remember this’ in the next election my friend.  Otherwise, when you get old, they will take you out in the woods, lay you down at the foot of a ‘beautiful big tree’ with a nice view of the ‘beautiful big valley’ , give you a small supply of drugs, with a straw to snort them through, and let your decaying body fertilize the ‘beautiful big tree’.  Isn’t that a beautiful and pleasant thought???  I think I’ll paint a picture of that and send it to Obama as a going away present…

Happy day my friend, and God bless!  

de Andréa 

Thursday, June 28, 2012

The Arab Spring

The Arab Spring

The Arab Spring started long, long ago, at least as far back as the 1950’s with the Islamization of Indonesia, then Lebanon in the 1960’s.  The difference here is, the current U.S. President supports it.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2012

If by some unknown reason you are still unaware that your president had officially committed treason more than 57 times making him the worst criminal since the Rosenberg’s, then you must have some excuse, such as you had amnesia the past four years, or you were held captive in a Chinese prison or maybe you were in a coma.  All would be good excuses I might add.

But if nothing even close to this has occered, then what should be perfectly clear to you by now, is that Barry Soetoro or Barrack Hussein Obammah or what ever he is calling himself these days, is a sleeper terrorist Muslim.  He is part of the Muslim Brotherhood that is inch by inch foot by foot yard by yard and now country by country taking over the world!!!

No! Being busy doesn’t cut it…

Indonesia, Lebanon, Niger, Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovnia, Serbia, Sudan, Qatar, Bahrain, Mali, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and Belgium, have all become Islamic States since 1952, and Syria, Turkey, France, The Netherlands, England,  and now Jordan, Pakistan, Russia, Mexico, Canada, and the United States. will shortly become part of the Nation of Islam controlled by Sharia.  And Obama is responsible for supporting the brotherhood takeover of the 5 highlighted in yellow and soon 3 more highlighted in Green.

What should be clear is that Obama has brainwashed and indoctrinated American citizens into believing that “We are not at war with Islam”, so he can continue to support Islamic terrorist organizations such as Hamas Hisbala and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Oh I almost forgot there is no such thing as terrorism either, it is “Man Caused Disasters”.  So how can he be charged with treason for aiding and abetting the enemy when Islam is not the enemy?  One Question…Who is the enemy?

What is now clear is that no matter how much Americas long time ally King Abdullah of Jordan does to fight corruption and implement reforms, the Muslim Brotherhood will continue to argue that it is not enough.  Arabs feel that President Obama's endorsement and support of the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa, Egypt and now in Syria has emboldened them and increased their desire to drive moderate and secular rulers out of the Middle East.  Unless the US administration stops supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, Jordan will be next to be turned into an Islamic republic.

Jordanian government officials say there are growing signs that the kingdom's powerful Muslim Brotherhood organization has plans to overthrow the regime.

King Abdullah has good reason to be worried about the Muslim Brotherhood's efforts to hijack the pro-reform drive in the kingdom.  This concern was reportedly one of the main reasons that the monarch replaced Prime Minister Awn Khasawna a few weeks ago – he was a staunch supporter of rapprochement with the Muslim Brotherhood and its Palestinian sister-movement, Hamas.

In a bid to appease the anti-corruption and pro-democracy campaigners, King Abdullah has also taken a number of unprecedented measures against a number of senior government officials suspected of embezzling public funds and abusing their powers.  The king has replaced three prime ministers since the "Arab Spring" began and has thrown a number of former officials into prison, but all this has not satisfied the Muslim Brotherhood, because only total submission to the Muslim Brotherhood will be satisfactory.  

They have learned from the Egyptian experience, where Muslim Brotherhood also hijacked the anti-regime protests that were triggered by secular and genuine reformists," explained a senior Jordanian government official in Amman.
Another Jordanian official said that his government has proof that "outside forces" were backing Muslim Brotherhood's scheme to "spread chaos and anarchy in the kingdom" by exploiting demands for reform and democracy.

The official pointed out that some representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood recently visited Turkey, where they reportedly met with former CIA deputy director Steven Kappes and former British MI5 chief Eliza Manningham-Buller.  Osama Rantisi, a prominent Jordanian journalist and political analyst, claimed that Kappes and Manningham-Buller pledged in the meeting that "the US government and its intelligence services will support the Muslim Brotherhood goals of reaching power."

The claim has, as one might expect, been vehemently denied by both the US government and Muslim Brotherhood.  Muslim Brotherhood leaders say the report about a conspiracy backed by the US and Britain to help the group topple King Abdullah's regime is part of a smear campaign waged by Jordan's General Intelligence Department.

Some Jordanians have also pointed to Iran and its proxy Hezbollah militia in Lebanon as being behind a Muslim Brotherhood scheme to stage a coup in the kingdom of Jordan.

What has particularly worried King Abdullah is that the Muslim Brotherhood has managed to "infiltrate" many powerful Jordanian tribes, which have always been known as traditional and staunch supporters of the monarchy.

Unless the US Administration stops supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, Jordan will be turned into a Sharia Islamic republic and a source of further and on going instability in the Middle East.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  So not only has Obama come right out and said that he is a Muslim, which means that he subscribes to the Muslim Ideology of supremacism and the Muslim agenda of world domination.  But one can easily follow Obama’s agenda of support for the Muslim Brotherhood, (the revived Ottoman Empire and designated as a co-conspirator in the Islamic terrorist Holyland trial) not only in this country but ALL OVER the world.  So unless you are so weak minded as to be brainwashed, indoctrinated, and otherwise deceived by this Jug-head, excuse me…Jihadist Muslim president.  Or as I said in a coma or something similar, you must know by now that Obama or Soetoro or what ever his name is, shouldn’t be in the Oval Office he should be in a small square Jail far away from any living things.

Except maybe spider’s snakes and scorpions…

de Andréa 

America Right On Track

America Right On Track

Dewey was right…America is right on track…  But the question is, what track is America on, and how did we get there?

By de Andréa
June 28, 2012

Nearly a century ago already, so-called progressives set out to take over America to put it back on track they said.  One of the ways they planned to accomplish this was to change the face of the public school system.  Led by American psychologist and social communist John Dewey, the foundations of the education system began to change.  Change into Social Communist indoctrinational institutions. 

John Dewey was instrumental in the philosophical changes that took place in the American education system, starting back in the 1920s right after the government changed the country from a “Representative Republic” to a “Democracy” in 1913. 

Dewey and others believed that the school system was the perfect place to reshape the nation.  Dewey often said that if you gave him your kids for seven hours a day that he could change the nation.  He taught that the schools should be used to teach children basic socialistic ideals and that after two to three generations, those ideals planted in the youth would present a culture in America that could lead to a social communist government.

Two generations after Dewey launched his revision of the American educational system, the nation saw the early socialist teachings in the nationwide protests in the 1960s.  It was a generation that started rejecting the conservative Christian values of their parents.  They succeeded in removing the Bible and prayer from the public schools.  Known as the generation of peace and love, they actually promoted anti-American philosophies.
Three generations later, the products of the socialist public education system are holding political offices and successfully changing the American way of life.  If you look at the majority of the people involved in the anti-Capitalist Occupy movements around the country, they are under the age of forty and I would bet that over ninety percent of them are products of the public schools.

They have not been taught the true history of America, and what this country was built upon.  They have been brainwashed that capitalism, free enterprise, and patriotism are actually harmful to our nation and the people.  They don’t realize that these are the very things that made our nation great and provided the foundation for the lifestyles that they take for granted.

Instead of the being taught what America was, they are being indoctrinated with what socialists want America to be.  They’ve been programmed to blame those that have worked hard and succeeded in business.  They’ve been instructed that instead of working hard to make themselves successful, they are instead entitled to certain things and that it is the responsibility of the government to take care of them.

The public school’s three generations of brainwashing is directly responsible for the uprising against the so-called one percent and the demand that they distribute their wealth and give it to those that have no descent work ethic to provide for themselves.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Congratulations Mr. Dewey, the Occupy movement is a direct result of your efforts to destroy the greatest free country in the world by brainwashing several generations of Americans to usher in a truly oppressive Communist society.  And then came Obama…

Now you know what track we’re on and how we got there…  Question, do you really think it’s the right track???

de Andrae

Obama Takes his Ball, and Bat

Obama Takes his Ball, and Bat
And goes home
I remember when I was a little kid, sometimes the kid with the ball and bat wouldn’t get his way so he would simply go home and take his ball and bat with him, leavening the rest of us with nothing to play ball with.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2012

Obama didn’t get his way with Arizona’s immigration law in the Supreme Court, so like a little kid he is leaving Arizona to fit for itself when it comes to protecting the state from a foreign invasion.  

On Monday, the same day that the Supreme Court upheld the heart of Arizona's SB 1070 illegal alien law, Obama retaliated and cancelled the Federal immigration enforcement partnership with that state.  The federal 287(g) program creates cooperation between the federal government and state and local police forces to identify and remove illegal aliens.  Arizona had been signed up with 287(g) for years, until Obama abruptly cancelled it, leaving the State with no ball and no bat.

As you know, Pres. Obama sued the state of Arizona to block S.B. 1070, the nations-leading bill that gave Arizona several ways to enforce immigration laws.  The Obama administration claimed that the federal government and only the federal government can enforce Federal laws.
Oh really???  Well first, if the federal government would do its constitutional job of protecting the states from this illegal invasion across our borders the states wouldn’t have to.  And second, my suggestion then is that all the states protect themselves and ignore ‘all’ the Federal laws and let Obama enforce them all by himself.  We can get our own ball and bat.  Secession anyone?  Anyone???

The court agreed that it is the Congress that must make immigration law, and it threw out several of the enforcement methods’ in SB 1070.  Yet the justices allowed the most important basic enforcement method to stand.  Arizona is permitted to require its police to check on immigration status of people who are already detained, such as in traffic stops.  If a person or persons are challenged, and cannot show that they are in the U.S. legally, the Supreme Court agrees that the state can enforce the basic Federal law, and turn illegal aliens over to federal officers, such as in 287(g).

How did the Obama administration react to the court's decision?  Did it   agree to work hard with Arizona law enforcement officials to remove illegal aliens from that state?  No, the administration retaliated by immediately canceling its 287(g) agreement with Arizona.  In effect, the people of Arizona were told, if you don’t play the game my way I will take my ball and bat and go home.  We will refuse to cooperate with you.  We will not even come to pick up the illegal aliens that you pick up in your state.

This is outrageous!  The whole purpose of 287(g) is to help local law enforcement remove illegal aliens they come across while enforcing state law.

Obama is doing, is warning the states that if they pursue their Supreme Court-affirmed right to enquire about immigration status, I will burn down their state and bring out the marshmallows!  Typical Muslim!

Obama insists that Congress must set all immigration policy.  Yet Obama isn't allowing Arizona to use one of the few means Congress has authorized, which is 287(g).  Ironically, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recognizes, on their website, the effectiveness of the 287(g) program:  Well…that’s why Obama doesn’t like it…pilgrim!

Terrorism and criminal activity are most effectively combated through a multi-agency/multi-authority approach that encompasses federal, state, and local resources, skills, and expertise.

Obama’s move is another action that is a violation of the U.S. Constitution and clearly violates the spirit of Congress.  It will set back immigration enforcement by years if left standing.  It must be undone.

Article IV section IV of the U.S. Constitution reads as follows:  The United
States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.   

Obama has violated the constitution once again, the federal government, as is clearly stated in Article IV section IV of the U.S. Constitution is charged with protecting all the states against an invasion of any kind, that’s why it doesn’t specify a particular type of invasion. 

The States, on our southern border especially, are clearly experiencing an Invasion.  Mexicans who just want to earn a living, drug cartel members who kill Americans, and Middle Eastern terrorists who want to kill everyone, are pouring into this country, it is an invasion plain and simple just the way the Constitution describes it, and yet the federal government does less than nothing it even encourages it.  A ‘Writ of Mandamus’ should be filed against every member of congress and the President; none of them are doing the job they were elected to do, or upholding their oath of office.

Need more proof of what Obama’s agenda is my friend?  This is not an isolated case you see, just today Obama flatly refused to make good on another 287(g) partnership, this one with the State of Virginia, another constitutional enforcement-oriented state.  Obama doesn’t play well with others.

What's next?  Did you know that the military is practicing “Urban Warfare” in some American cities and towns?  No one seems to know why…

I know why… stay tuned!

de Andréa

The Brotherhood Of Egypt

The Brotherhood Of Egypt
Obama called his new fellow Muslim dictator Mohammed Mursi of Egypt to congratulate him on his election victory.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2012

I’m not going to say I told you so!  But I did…
President Obama should be very proud of himself today.  The Muslim Brotherhood (the revived Ottoman Empire which began in Egypt in 1928 just four years after the demise of the Empire) now called by its code name the “Arab Spring” has successfully taken over Egypt.  Obama has worked diligently as a Muslim should to bring about in word and deed in Egypt just as he did in Tanzania, Libya, and now in Syria.  Moreover, Obama has reached a new milestone with the election of a Muslim Brotherhood Islamist as the new Sharia Dictator of Egypt, creating a new Iran.  Who says Obama can’t do great things?

This is reminiscent of Jimmy Carter who encouraged the transformation of Iran from a U.S.-allied reasonably modern nation under the reign of the shah into an Islamo-fascist Shariah state under the Ayatollah Khomeini.  To this day, Iran remains a sponsor of global terrorism and threat to Middle East and world peace.

In Egypt, President Obama backed the removal of U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak.  Mubarak was an iron-fisted presence, hardly an enlightened Western-style ruler, but he worked with us and kept his country running peaceably.

During the revolution in Egypt, Obama talked incessantly about the sprouting of “democracy” (Islamic code for Sharia law) in the Middle East. But the truth be known, as seen in the foreign press and on the Internet, was that the Muslim Brotherhood was the cause of a huge storm of violence that targeted women, Christians, Jews, Westerners of all stripes and anyone else who didn’t toe the Islamist line.  Democracy my…  ‘fat’ aha… foot.

Churches were burned.  Kaffaar (non Muslim) families were killed.  Women were dragged out of their homes, beaten, and raped in the street.  An American CBS reporter Lara Logan was raped repeatedly by a mob of more than 200 men on the very night the Mubarak government fell.  But Obama covered that up be omitting it from the annual report on International Human Rights, read the story.

Mursi is beginning his regime today with calls for “peace” and “unity,” (code words for adherence to Sharia) much to the delight of ignorant enabling Western liberals.  The reality, I guarantee will be something completely different. 

The brotherhood’s stated goal, supported by Obama, is to make the Quran the sole dictate for religious, political, and social life, and to create a Shariah-law state.

In recent weeks, Israel has already felt the effects of the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power in Egypt as barrages of rockets have rained down on towns near their southern Egyptian border.  Can you just take a wild ‘shot in the dark’ and guess what it will be like in America when the same thing happens in Canada and Mexico?  Well…it won’t really matter because America will be Islamic as well.  Soon Israel will be the only country left that isn’t completely Islamic.  But not to worry - God will protect it.  I’m thinking of moving to Israel, in the end it will be the safest place on Earth.

In light of the other changes sweeping the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia planning to fund the Syrian rebel army and Turkey dragging NATO into its border conflict with Syria, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Egyptian presidency should be ringing alarm bells in Washington, but alas, it won’t.  You know, Ignorance-Deception-Enablement-Destruction.

In the call to Mursi, President Obama “emphasized his interest in working together with president-elect Mursi, on the basis of mutual respect, to advance the many shared interests between Egypt and the U.S. The shared interests of course include the conquest of Islam as the supreme ruler of the World, one small incremental surreptitious step at a time my friend.

Better dust off your prayer rug…or, maybe it would be a good time to get on Gods side of the fence…

Think about it my friend.

de Andréa

The Islamic State of Michigan

The Islamic State of Michigan

The American State of Michigan is well on its way to becoming an Islamic State.  No, I mean totally Islamic, just like Saudi Arabia.  The city of Dearborn is a model for what the rest of the state will soon become, and your town might be the next one my friend.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2012

For those who are still brainwashed and/or ignorant and deceived enough to believe that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance - take a good look at what your town or city will look like within the next ten years or so.  Watch a video of this’ year’s "Muslim Arab Festival" in Dearborn, (WARNING: This video contains obscenities and violence by the Muslims, not to mention Sharia law enforcement by police) it has predictably escalated from last year, and will continue to escalate from here - because of the enablement of the police and our government.  This goes on all over America people!  Notice how the police see the quiet restrained Christians just carrying signs with Bible verses on them getting pelted with bottles and rocks as a threat to public safety, while the Muslim kids assault them with milk crates, glass bottles, rocks, pieces of concrete, eggs and whatever they can find. 

The police are complicit in the behavior of the Muslims at the festival.  They encourage their rioting and their provocation.  They also say they cannot spare just two officers to stay and protect the Christians, but notice at the end they have about 15 officers that come to escort the Christians out. Also note that there wasn't any preaching or handing out of information, just signs.  Personally, I believe if you are going to minister to Muslims, then at least hand out information to those that are interested.  But then that’s just me!

One might think or say that there is absolutely no reason for the Muslims to react this way towards anyone, but one would be wrong.  This, my friend, is a prime example of what it means to be a so-called moderate Muslim.  Scratch “moderate” there is no such thing, one is either a Muslim or one is not.  So in a nut shell, what does it mean to be a Muslim?  These kids are a good example, they are taught to act this way by their parents, their parents act this way because of Sharia.  Sharia is the law that dictates every aspect of a Muslims life from hygiene to the food they eat to the money they earn.  There is no god but Allah/Satan if you don’t conform to that you are killed.  If you’re a female and you drive a car you are killed.  Islam is a brutally oppressive religion that is also their government.  Muslims do not - repeat, do not, assimilate into another culture they change your’ culture to their’ culture.  They change your’ law to their’ law.  Muslims are the most violent, brutal, hateful, and intolerant people that live and breath.  That is all I can fit in the nut shell, for the rest, read the rest of my articles on Islam in the archives or better yet do what I did, simply read the Quran and the Hadith.

The policemen in this clip are advised by Sharia law and a Muslim police chief.  As a result they turned blind eyes to the real culprits in all of this and if you will notice they say they don’t have “free speech zones.”  Let me ask you this, where in American Constitutional law is it declared one must have a free speech zone to exercise the right of free speech?  It doesn’t.  In fact, the very officers that were there’ were supposed to be protecting everyone’s right to free speech, including the Christians, instead they were enforcing Sharia where the only speech and violence is Islam.

Note; the non-uniformed police officer who pokes his head into the discussion is Wayne County Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar a Muslim.  He would later state that…  “It's a great family-oriented festival. . .  The atmosphere right now is phenomenal–all the kids are having a good time, and we’re doing our best to keep everyone safe and I think our guys are doing a great job at it.” Of course they are!  If you feel so inclined Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar can be reached at the sheriff’s office at MJAAFAR@CO.WAYNE.MI.US  Tell him what you think about their Sharia law enforcement.  And ask him where the constitution is in all this.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Well, I’m sorry to say, but if “We the people” just continue to allow ourselves to be brainwashed with this “Islam is a tolerant and peaceful religion” garbage, and just sit by our backyard pools sipping our Mint Juleps, one day soon - someone will bomb your house and/or shoot your children just because you don’t eat Halal food.  (That’s Sharia for food processed by a Muslim Cleric, and offered to and blessed by Allah/Satan).  Moreover as in Dearborn, the police will not do a thing to stop it my friend because they will be Muslim.  That’s what happens when you allow yourselves to be ignorantly deceived; you then enable your own destruction.

Eventually you will either have to fight or switch…  Are you ready for that???
de Andréa 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mary Was Raped

Mary Was Raped

No not just any Mary, Mary the Mother of Jesus.  So says Paul Verhoeven, who directed Hollywood movies including “Robocop,” “Total Recall” and “Basic Instinct.”  He is making a new movie based on his 2008 book, “Jesus of Nazareth,” where Jesus is said to be a bastard child.

BY de Andréa
June 27, 2012

A new Hollywood film is in the works that some are already calling blasphemous.  It will portray Jesus as the product of His mother Mary being raped by a Roman soldier, and shows that miracles mentioned in the New Testament were not real.  I just can’t help but wonder where the documentation is for this belief of Verhoeven’s, or was he there in BC #1 or AD #1 to witness this event himself?

According to, Verhoeven’s take on the life of Jesus discounts all the miracles mentioned in Scripture, including the virgin birth and the resurrection, as Verhoeven doesn’t believe any of it actually took place.

Pictured is Hollywood director Paul Verhoeven

The most controversial of Verhoeven’s notions is that “Jesus was the product of his mother being raped by a Roman soldier”, which Verhoeven said was commonplace at the time.  He said, “Jesus was a radical prophet who performed exorcisms and was convinced he would find the kingdom of heaven on earth.  --- [No, your showing your ignorance Paul, it wasn’t Jesus that thought that, it was the Jews, read the BIBLE and you will find the truth] --- and did not know he would be sentenced to die on the cross by Pontius Pilate.”  Deadline reported.  [ Again your showing your ignorance Paul, it was Pontius Pilate that didn’t know he was going to sentence Jesus to Death.  Jesus knew from the beginning.] You really do need to read your Bible Paul.

Why is it so hard for people like Paul Verhoeven to believe in the virgin birth?  Medical science does this all the time now.  Mary was nothing but a surrogate mother for Jesus the Son of God.  God place his seed in Mary much as doctors do now.

“He is treading on territory that Christians universally would label as blasphemous,” says Mike Fleming of Deadline.  “The film seems to have landed in the appropriate place, as a gritty and controversial independent film.”

Verhoeven spoke of Jesus in these terms:  “If you look at the man, it’s clear that you have a person who was completely innovative in the field of ethics.  My own passion for Jesus came when I started to realize that.  It’s not about miracles; it’s about a new set of ethics, an openness towards the world, which was anathema in a Roman-dominated world.  I believe he was crucified because they felt that politically, he was a dangerous person whose following was getting bigger and bigger.  Jesus’ ideals are about the utopia of human behavior, about how we should treat each other, how we should step into the shoes of our enemy.”  Again Paul your wrong, it wasn’t Jesus who was an anathema.  Its you Paul, you’re the anathema…

Muse Productions will reportedly be producing the new film, and Roger Avary, who won an Oscar for co-writing 1994′s “Pulp Fiction,” is on board to adapt the book into a screenplay.  No date has been mentioned yet for when the film is targeted for release, Verhoeven is apparently looking for financial backing for the film.  We can pray that he does not find any backers.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Anyone involved in the production of this film will face the wrath of God.  I personally will NOT watch this film, but I will write to these people and tell them that they are treading on thin ice unless they cancel this film, because God’s judgment will be harsh if they choose to mock him.  The Bible has never failed in its record of historical events.  Archaeologists and scientists are discovering more proof of biblical accounts every day, even as I write this article.

I can’t help but remember when cartoons of the so-called prophet Muhammad of Islam appeared in a Danish newspaper, Satan’s wrath of hell was unleashed on the world, and people were killed even though they had nothing to do with the cartoons.  Moreover the liberals in the west condemned the Danish government for not taking the Newspaper to task.  

I believe that I am safe in saying that there will likely be no backlash at all from the media about this outrage…  Someone who attacks my Jesus in that way, attacks me, and I have run out of cheeks to turn, but that’s just me!

de Andréa     

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Fast and Furious vs. Wide Receiver

Fast and Furious vs. Wide Receiver

Was Bush’s ‘Wide Receiver’ in 2005 and Obama’s ‘Fast and Furious’ in 2009 the same thing with the same purpose?

By de Andréa
June 25, 2012

Among the many responses to my articles titled What Did Obama Know And When Did He Know It  and  “The Question of Executive Privilege”  was the statement; “Well…President Bush authorized the same basic operation in 2005”.  Not even close my friends!

“Wide Receiver” in 2005 was a small scale law enforcement gun smuggling interdiction effort that involved Phoenix-based ATF agents working in conjunction with Mexican law enforcement.  ATF supervisors and justice department prosecutors in Arizona were trying to build a case against a violent group of Mexican drug smugglers to find out who they were, and where they were.  “Fast and Furious” in 2009 on the other hand, was an effort to frame American gun dealers and to build a case against the Second Amendment to support Obama’s national gun ban efforts, in order to end all American Constitutional rights and to do away with the American citizen’s ability to defend their own ‘Freedom’.  The second Amendment clearly states its own purpose; “…being necessary for the security of a free State…”  That’s the stark difference my friend! 

Wide Receiver began in 2005
Wide Receiver was authorized by President Bush.  It involved four hundred guns.  All of the weapons had RFID trackers installed in them, and they were actively tracked.  The Mexican government was kept fully informed, and they were an active participant. The ATF agents tracked the guns using radio devices and aircraft.  They wanted to find out where the guns ended up, in the hands of which cartels and where they were, so that a case could be made.  It was an effort to track these people to locate them, and arrest them.

The Bush administration, as part of Wide Receiver, notified the Mexican government when arms and drug smugglers were crossing.  Once the ATF found out the smugglers were disabling the tracking devices that were planted in the guns the program was shut down in October of 2007 but only after 1400 arrests were made and the guns confiscated. 

Now, here is Fast and Furious
Fast and Furious began in October of 2009.  Obama was in his tenth month, wide Receiver hadn’t existed for two years.  Fast and Furious involved over 2,000 guns.  Wide Receiver was roughly 400 guns.  No tracking devices were planted in the Fast and Furious guns.  Obama didn’t care where they ended up or how many people would be killed.  No effort was made to track them at all.  No helicopters, no on-the-ground surveillance of the straw purchasers.  The guns were sold, they were walked across the border, and that was it.  Four federal agencies were involved in maybe as many as 10 cities in five states, and the Mexican government was not notified that the program even existed.  They did not use any tracking devices or aircraft to try to find and track the smugglers, remember that wasn’t the purpose of the operation.  Moreover, if that isn’t enough, the local ATF field agents were ordered not’ to follow the guns or the straw purchasers.  Fast and Furious was a frame job of American gun dealers, and to create a fiasco to demonize guns in America, - pure and simple.  What’s more no arrests were made and the guns are still in the hands of the drug lords and are still used to murder innocent people.  

Fast and Furious is worse than anything you could have conjured up in your own mind.  Wide Receiver has nothing at all in common, other than guns crossing the border, that’s it.  Federal agents furthermore, — are you following all this, my friend?  — Federal agents were not even allowed to interdict the guns; - on the contrary, they even ran interference for the smugglers with local law enforcement on multiple occasions to make sure those guns made it across the border and into the hands of the warring Mexican drug cartels paramilitary. 

Watch a video of Senator John Cornyn questioning Eric Holder on Nov. 8, 2011.
Read what Ann Coulter has to say about Fast and Furious.  

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Don’t misunderstand; I am not trying to defend Bush.  But to equate Obama with any other president in American history is gross ignorance and a mistake of astronomical proportions my friend…

de Andréa 

Monday, June 25, 2012

What Does Obama Know...

What Does Obama Know,
And When Did He Know It?

In 2011, President Obama said that he knew ‘nothing’ about “Fast And Furious”, his Attorney General Eric Holder said he Knew nothing about it, Homeland Security Director Napolitano said she knew nothing about it, the ATF’s Acting Director  Kenneth Melson knew nothing about it.  And yet it was announced in a press conference at the white house by the Deputy Attorney General on May 24 2009, oop’s…  I’ve got film.

By de Andréa
June 25, 2012                                                                        

I am writing this article as a follow up to the article titled The Question of Executive Privilege”.  You decide if Obama is hiding something.

One member of Congress has started, using the word “ACCESSORY” [before the fact], in talking about members of the Obama Regime who had their dirty GSR fingers in Operation Gunrunner, code named, “Fast and Furious”. 

“Under the leadership of Obama” said Deputy Attorney General David Ogden on the 24th of May 2009, a full two years before anyone in Washington said they ever heard of “Gunrunning” or “Gunwalking” to the Mexican Drug Lords.  The BATFE ordered Arizona gun dealers to illegally sell weapons to Mexican buyers, who then in turn dumped them into the drug cartel civil war.  Everyone in Obama’s Kremlin suddenly developed amnesia, Obama lied, and people died!

On a personal note
I don’t know about you, but I have had and used guns most of my adult life and I have yet to see any of them walk, or run’  for that matter.  It is obviously just another way of shifting the responsibility from the perpetrators of a crime to an inanimate object that can in no way defend itself.  Guns don’t kill people, they never have, people kill people, and guns don’t walk either, people walk!  In over 500 years since guns were invented not one of them has ever killed anything or anyone and they have never run, walked, jumped or drove a bus.  I just wanted to clear that up since there are some people out there in the ether, smoking funny things that ignorantly think otherwise.

The Obama agenda
Approximately 2000 weapons illegally sold to Mexican gunrunners resulted in the mass murder of hundreds of innocent Mexican citizens and at least two American government officials.  And all this was to fuel support for Obama’s up and coming “UN Gun Ban Treaty” in the U.S. that is now before the Senate and awaiting a 2/3’s vote.  If this UN gun-ban treaty passes the senate, that will be the end of freedom my friend.  See my article titled “Obama’s Treaties”.

Barrack Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder.  Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, Homeland Security’ Janet Napolitano, and even Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg, well… likely the whole Obama Regime was part of this Criminal Conspiracy more than two years earlier, despite his sworn assurance to Congress in a May 2011 on Capital Hill that it was only within the “last few weeks” Erick Holder said that he even heard of the project, and yet a stack of memos reveals that he knew about the operation 26 months earlier.  (You will discover that access to these documents has been mysteriously and conveniently removed from the internet, I can only imagine why.)  You’ll have to trust me I’ve seen them.

But now ‘a video’ has been uncovered, (you had better watch that before Obama has that confiscated and shredded as well).  It shows that a full two years earlier, March 24 2009, Holder’s Deputy is on camera talking about the project and what the department was doing to “intercept weapons” trafficking along the Mexican border through the Gunrunning operation Fast and Furious.  Aah, “Intercept weapons”…that must be another code word for selling guns to criminals to murder innocent citizens and an occasional U.S. official.  Oh well! You know - the cost of Politics and all… to sacrifice ones Knight to Checkmate the King is an acceptable loss on ones way to tyranny.

In May 2011, Holder told Congress, “I’m not sure of the exact date, but I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time, over the last few weeks.”  (That’s because I was dropped on my head as a child).  Really?  No  not ‘really’, but in the video, dated March 24, 2009, some 26 months earlier, David Ogden, Holder’s deputy attorney general, was talking about Barack Obama’s great leadership in assisting the Mexican drug cartels, using “Project Gunrunner” the original name for Operation Fast and Furious.

And then listen to an interview with WorldNetDaily TV/Radio America, and Arizona Republican Congressman Paul Gosar who said Holder and the Obama administration need to be “fully compliant” with congressional subpoenas and produce the information to determine “who authorized this.”  He said Americans have become “collateral damage” for a program of the Obama administration.  “We have no idea where these guns are going to show up,” he said.  “They show up at crime scenes.”  

And what of the “program of the Obama Administration” that Gosar talked about?  Well…he… also… mentioned that the real purpose behind the Gunrunning Fast and Furious Operation was to fuel support for Obama’s U.S. National “GUN BAN”, that’s Obama’s program and agenda.  So you see - there is more than one way to commit a crime and to ban a gun, you can just launch a program, an “operation”, sacrifice a couple of Knights, a Rook or two and voila, instant Dictatorship, unless of course your buddies rat you out and you land in jail.  One can only hope!

Pinal County, Ariz., Sheriff Pa  ul Babeu recently told reporters he figures there were more than 300 casualties from Operation Fast and Furious, and he thinks charges are appropriate against officials who bear responsibility.
The officials, he says, would include President Obama, and his buddy Holder. Babeu released a video in which he says there were more than 2,000 weapons on the loose, the operation must have been authorized from officials above the level of the BATFE.  Yeah!  Ya think, ‘way above’, my friend, way above.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I know it, I just know it; Obama is dirty…he’s real dirty! Please remember this in this coming November presidential election.

Well…what do you’ know, and when and how, did you know it my friend???

-de Andréa