Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Whose Country Is This anyway, Ours Or Islam’s?

If we don’t take America back soon, it will belong to Islam just as all the Muslim countries around the world. Don’t you doubt me!

By de Andréa

No, this is not Teheran Iran, or even Paris France where this has become an everyday occurrence, no my friend this is New York City USA.

If Muslims can pray on Madison Avenue, why are Christians banned from praying in public and erecting religious displays on their holy days?

What happened to Americas National Day of Prayer? Obama says we can't have it anymore, why… because Obama is a Muslim, so Muslims are allowed to close and block off Madison Avenue at 41st Street in New York City and pray in the middle of the street once each and every year.

Listen to the Muslim call to prayer heard 5 times everyday in Manhattan

A Christian Nation cannot put up a Christmas scene of the baby Jesus in a public place, but the Muslims can bring a city to its knees by stopping normal traffic and by worshiping in the streets... Something is happening in America that is reminiscent of what has been happening in Europe for a number of years. This is not just Political Correctness gone crazy this is the result of it; this is what the early stages of Islamic Jihad looks like my friend...

On September 4, 2010, I wrote and published an article titled “A Warning To America” with a video showing this daily ritual demonstration of Islamic Jihad in the streets of Paris. Now it has come to America. This Islamic takeover of our streets will not go away and it will not stay the same, it will continue to progress until they have taken over your homes, neighborhoods and your country.

This is a picture of NYC where there are large number of mosques but Muslims say they cannot fit into their mosques so they fill the surrounding streets, facing east for a couple of hours between 2 & 4 p.m. sometimes whenever they want.

The truth is, they come from surrounding Burroughs and even from other states to do this demonstration of Muslim Jihad power.

Besides this one at 42nd St & Madison Avenue, there is another, even larger group, at 94th St & 3rd Avenue and others.

Also, I presume, you are by now aware of the dispute over building another "high rise" Islamic Mosque a few blocks from where the nation of Islam attacked the United States on September 11 2001 and killed thousands of people. "Ground zero".

Obama and his cronies’ just call 9/11 a man caused disaster. But then what can you expect from a Muslim terrorist supporting president.

With regard to “ground zero”, the "Imam" refuses to disclose where the $110 million dollars to build his ‘Islamic shrine of triumph’ is coming from, moreover, there is a lawsuit filed to force disclosure of that information. The truth will disclose that the money is coming right out of your children’s pockets. Yep taxpayer funded…

This is New York City on Madison Avenue, not France Yemen or Kenya.

Is there a message here somewhere???? Yes, there is, and the message is that they are claiming America for their satanic god Allah “Stealth Jihad”. If we don't wake up soon from our slumbering deception, we are going to "politically correct" ourselves right out of our own country!

THE BOTTOM LINE: I have been warning you about this for several years now. Amid all the scoffers and those of you that have called me a conspiracy not job or worse, Islam nevertheless continues with its stealth agenda of infiltration and Jihad in America.

Some of you will stubbornly continue in your blind politically correct deception right up until the time the Muslims blow down the front door of your home and kill all your children.

Some German people did the same when the Nazis were surreptitiously infiltrating German society. When they finally woke up it was too late, they had lost their country to the Muslim Nazis. Yes Muslim Nazis…They are the same, just a different flavor with the same agenda. Funny, we didn’t elect a Nazi president or allow the Nazis to close our streets, demonstrate, defy our laws and culture during the Second World War with Nazism, but we stupidly elect a Muslim president, allow the Muslims to live here, and incrementally take over our country while we are in a world war with Islam. 'Oh' that’s right, our Muslim president says we are at war with just a few radicals. Why then after ten years of war, haven’t we run out of these few radicals??? Because as I said, we are at war with the nation of Islam, they are approaching 2 billion world wide nearly 33 percent of the worlds population, and more than 8 million of them are in the United States, that’s approximately 2.7 percent of the U.S. population and growing.

Tell me again; whose country is this, ours or the Muslims?

Are we deaf, dumb and blind, or just plain ignorant or stupid?

You decide…

de Andréa

Saturday, November 27, 2010

The Vattel Theory - A Writ of Certiorari

Is the U.S. Constitution the legitimate fundamental law of America? Or has it gone the way of all law when Government corruption prevails? We may now finally see what the Supremes have to say.

By de Andréa
I told you, this is not going away folks… And I bet you didn’t see ‘this’ on the front page of the NY Times.

The blatant violations of Federal and Constitutional law have become S.O.P. in this administration. Why… because the entire Obama administration is founded on criminal fraud. Will this finally be the case that will bring the Obama regime down?

The Supreme Court conferred on November 21, 2010 on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of the New Jersey Kerchner v. Obama case. This is one of the more than 50 cases challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the legal precedent of the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were ‘both’ American citizens. That leaves me out; my mother was not a legal citizen when I was born.

"This case of presidential eligibility is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we have presented an ironclad case.”

We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a "writ of certiorari,"

If the Supreme Court decides to grant the writ of certiorari it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court's decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.

If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the "death knell" for Obama's legitimacy. "Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else, it is "undisputed fact" that Obama's father was a British subject." Apuzzo said.

Discovery
The most important part of this suit is that it would grant full disclosure. Obama would be required to disclose all of his documents under the discovery statute. This requires defense attorneys to disclose all documents of the defendant to the court and the plaintiff’s attorney.

The discovery statute is what is keeping Obama from court martialing all those soldiers that refused direct orders on the bases that Obama is not the legitimate Commander in Chief. He would have to prove that he was.

“A hearing on the merits is also a death knell because it would allow ‘discovery’ so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, we don't know what that would show. We might not even get to the question of defining 'natural-born citizen.’ If he was not born in the U.S., he'd be undocumented, because he's never been naturalized. We don't even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, so far that's hearsay. We have not seen the root documents.” said Apuzzo.

Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that the discovery order alone would sink Obama's presidency.

"If one court had the guts to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office," Berg said. "We would ask for a lift of Obama's ban on all of his documents, ‘full disclosure’. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don't spend that kind of money unless there's something to hide, and I believe the reason he's hiding this is because he was not born in the United States."

"The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case," Berg added. "If the Supreme Court would decide to hear the case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear the case, Obama would be out of office on the Discovery Statute alone. They're taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens," Berg noted.

Apuzzo is arguing the "Vattel theory," which asserts that the term "natural-born citizen" as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work while living in Switzerland, "The Law of Nations," was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.

According to Apuzzo, “Congress and the courts have already addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. Moreover, the term "natural-born citizen" has never been altered”.

"The courts and Congress have never changed the definition," said Apuzzo. "The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him."

Precedent
Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel's definition of "natural-born citizen" in "dicta," or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in the 1814 "Venus" case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel's definition.

Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician, and historian, who used similar language to Vattel.

Previous cases challenging Obama's eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have "standing" to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office. "To me that's false," said Berg. "The 10th Amendment refers to 'we the people.’ If the people can't challenge the president's constitutionality that would be ridiculous." Then who can…

"My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president," said Apuzzo. "Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients."

Apuzzo said “The founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen. They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody's life, liberty and property in the process. They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen."

THE BOTTOM LINE: If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case or force the New Jersey Federal trial court to hear the case on its own merits no matter what they may be, Obama is toast because of the discovery statute. If Obama had a legal American birth certificate he would have disclosed it along time ago rather than spend 2 million of his own American dollars worth of Federal Reserve Play Money in lawyer fees and bribery payments to cover it up. Or maybe it wasn’t even his own money. Where would he get that much money to throw away?

Can you just imagine the heads that will roll in the State of Hawaii as well as in the Washington Kremlin when, oops, they can’t come up with the goods. Which begs the question of how much ‘mordida’ has been spread around in the Federal Justice system to stone wall this case?

‘Oh’ yeah! Just how far up the ladder does this corruption go??? You guessed it, all the way to the top. The buck stops in the oval office of what has become the U.S. Kremlin. Or the Grand Mosque of the 12th Caliphate I’m not sure which.

Oh boy! I would love to see some Beltway heads roll on this one…

de Andréa

Friday, November 26, 2010

The End of Western Civilization


Most societies throughout history, even the wealthiest and mightiest, have eventually collapsed and died. Do you know why? Are we on the track of cultural extinction?

By de Andréa

Why don't civilizations just continue to evolve and flourish forever as their knowledge and technology grow? What allows some cultures to continually bloom, and others to wither and die?

This question – normally one of mere historical and academic concern – is increasingly relevant to millions of Americans as we behold our beloved nation struggling in the grip of unprecedented financial, political, spiritual, cultural, and moral religious conflict.

Indeed, many traditionalists are warning that America is not immune to the forces and influences that have caused other great empires and societies to self-destruct.

Many traditionally-minded voices point to the rapid growth in America of homosexuality – not only its prevalence, but its virtual celebration – eerily reminiscent of Sodom and Gomorrah, the ancient cities whose destruction due to rampant immorality is described in the Old Testament of the Bible.

From the time of this nation's founding all the way up until the current era, mainstream Americans held the Bible to be their ultimate guidebook, and the "Judeo-Christian values" it espoused as their highest fundamental principles.

Today, however – especially throughout the elite realms of academia, science, government, and the news and the deception of the entertainment media – the Bible no longer retains the stature and universal credibility it once had. In its place, America listens to sociologists, scientists and other researchers and so-called progressives.

But what if the findings of "experts" – not just those enthralled and prone to irrational socialistic and atheistic philosophies, but those more in sync with the basic values that founded America and Western Civilization as a whole – lined up perfectly with those of Biblical and historical truth?

Such information would present a powerful message – and a warning – to the current generation of Americans, particularly regarding the dangers of sexual anarchy and homosexuality.

In his book "Sex and Culture," Unwin studied 86 historical civilizations ranging from tiny South Sea island principalities to the mighty Roman Empire. He found that a society's destiny is linked inseparably to the limits it imposes on sexual expression and that those sexual constraints correlate directly to its theological sophistication and religious commitment. Unwin noted that the most primitive societies had only rudimentary spiritual beliefs and virtually no restrictions on sexual expression, while societies with more sophisticated theologies placed greater restrictions on sexual expression, and achieved greater social development.

In particular, cultures that adopt what Unwin dubbed "absolute monogamy" proved the most vigorous, economically productive, artistically creative, scientifically innovative, and the most geographically expansive societies on earth.

THE BOTTOM LINE: America and Western civilization can be no exception to historical fact. Societies are not unlike a railroad track; one can see the destination by the historical direction that other trains have traveled.

Historically, traveling away from God’s Biblical truth of sexuality has proven disastrous.

What track is America on?

Could we be on the historical track of cultural extinction???

de Andréa

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Ca. Leads The Country In Social Tyranny

While the rest of the country attempts a return to Americanism, California continues to head down a dead end track to totalitarianism and poverty.

Opinion by de Andréa

With the exception of a couple of years in the early eighties, California has been hijacked by the brain-dead Democrat Liberal Communist Party who had been running things in Sacramento for more than four decades. These otherwise unemployable Communist Socialists partisans have been uniformly choosing the wrong tax and spend and governance and destructive tyrannical regulatory policies for more than 40 years.

They have taken the most advanced and best public educational system in the country and trashed it, and turned it into a robotic indoctrination institution at best. From what was on a par with any university education in America just a generation ago, we now have to feel lucky that there's a Louisiana, a Mississippi and an Alabama, or California would rank last out of the 50 states.

Every survey of business leaders over the past several years ranks California in the bottom two or three states in terms of friendliness to business formation and operation. Maybe that's why so few choose to start businesses, relocate, or open branch operations here. I myself fought for 30 years with the tyranny of the regulatory Gestapo.

Our income taxes are the third-highest in the country. Our sales taxes are fourth highest in the nation. Public employee’s, cop and fire unions are so gargantuan they're strangling our cities and our state with an unfunded pension bomb that's ready to explode in our collective faces. It's to the point that we now work for them, not the other way around. How was this allowed to happen?

Our road and bridge infrastructure is decaying before our very eyes. Our once-vaunted Central Valley agriculture once capable of feeding half the world, and recently produced more than 20% of all fruits and veggies in the nation, is now a depression-era dustbowl because some Commie Pinko weenie self-appointed legislator in a black robe shut off their water in favor of a three inch fish. What's that, you ask? This judge preferred a little Anchovy-sized fish over suffering drought-stricken jobless people. So the fish lives, and they die. We may even run out of food…Oh well! We can always eat the little fish. On second thought the stupid little thing is designated as an endangered species. Kinda like real Americans.

Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco (a noted illegal alien sanctuary city), now elected second in command in California, won't let the ROTC into its schools. S.F. prohibits the military from filming commercials inside county limits or the docking of navy ships, and it won't stop aggressive panhandling on city streets. But it will however prevent its citizens from buying guns to defend themselves from an ever rising crime rate and buying pets because they might abandon them. And now, San Fran has just passed legislation to prevent McDonald's from selling “Happy Meals” because they're deemed by the calorie police to be unhealthful…Amazing, do you think they really care about little bellies getting fat or is it just about power and control?

And these same liberal Commie policies have turned Los Angeles into a third world-toilet inhabited by illegal aliens and fourth-generation welfare recipients, sucking up our tax dollars like a Hoover vacuum cleaner on steroids.

Californians get what they deserve, because while the rest of the country rebelled against the tyranny of the liberals, California voters absolutely refused to change it. The election that just concluded gave Golden Staters yet one more chance to fix some of our current problems and prevent a plethora of others in the future. And what did you do California? You blew it, big time. You reelected Jerry Brown, the guy who earned the moniker "Moonbeam" when he was the Guv in the seventies. He appointed Rose Bird as Chief Justice of the state Supreme Court. She helped modify our justice system by overturning all the death penalty cases, every single one that came before her, 62 in all, including the Manson Family killers. And good ole Jer’ put us on the road to economic bankruptcy by signing legislation that permitted collective bargaining for public employee unions, which now threatens our State's very economic existence. Oh well we are probably too big to fail, Ben Bernanke will just have too start the printing presses again. Jerry vehemently opposed Proposition 13 until it passed, at which time he decided to support it. Flip-Flopper? You decide. After he termed out, he ran for and was elected Mayor of Oakland. He was so successful in this job the state was forced to take over their school system (a good case of the blind leading the blind). And, he managed to also double their murder rate. (one could argue he might have been even more successful if he had tripled it!)

Then, when you elected him as our illustrious Attorney General, Jerry refused to defend Proposition 8 in the courts even though he was obligated by law and his oath of office to do so. Whatever you think about gay marriages, Prop 8 made it illegal, and good old ‘Jer had a duty to defend it, despite his personal views on the subject. The Attorney General, nor any sworn official, does not have the right to pick and choose the laws they wish to support.

And now, Jerry Brown will likely live out his life without ever having had a private-sector job. Imagine. You get kicked out of the Jesuit seminary and then feed at the public trough for the rest of your liberal little, otherwise unprepossessing life… just astounding.

Then there's Bab’s Barbara Boxer. You reelected her, too California. After three terms in Washington representing herself, during which she earned the lowest possible rankings as to effectiveness, you sent her back for another six years for more of the same. She's never had a real job either; moreover, she has never met a payroll, never signed a check on its face, and knows nothing about private sector job creation. What she does know is that late term (murder) ‘a’… partial birth abortion is the preferred method of getting rid of those kids who can’t vote for her. And oh, she knows how to spend your money better than you do. She voted for tax increases 258, that’s two hundred and fifty eight times (for those of you that don’t know your numbers to good) during her ho-hum tenure. Even her home-town newspaper refused to endorse her, saying she was an ineffective and ineffectual senator and should be put out to pasture. But no! You bunch of robots; you decided to send her back again. Either of Jerry's or Bab's opponents would have been preferable to these preening, elite loser commies… but you decided turn your state into a third world garbage dump.

Now let's talk about the measures.
You failed to pass Prop 19, the pot legalization measure. That was surprising to me, because I assumed the majority of Cal voters had to be high on weed to have voted the way you did.
You voted down Prop 23, our last and best hope to derail AB32, the weed-hugger Global Warming Solutions Act, which Schwarzenwhoozits signed into law in 2006. That's the one whereby California decided to fix the world's climate problem all by itself, by rolling back greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, representing a 40% reduction. Of course, all the experts say doing that would be impossible without taking every single car and truck off the road not just in Caleeeforneea but in the country, but hey, nothing appears impossible to those nice air-head folks in Sacto. And who knows maybe the commute time will get shorter once all the cars and trucks are gone. So, AB32 kicks in on January 1, 2011, and the next sound you'll hear will be the doors slamming shut on U-Haul trucks as businesses prepare to vacate Caleeeforneea. And they'll take at least 1,000,000 jobs (that’s a million jobs for those of you that live in Rio Linda) with them. And your electric bill will double or triple after they go. The only ones left will be Starbucks baristas selling lattes to sign twirlers. I've said before and I say again, if you believe that carbon dioxide…, you know, the stuff plants breathe in and you exhale, is a greenhouse gas and air pollutant, please all you liberal commies will you stop all that bloody exhaling.

And Prop 25…Yep, it passed. That's the one that lets those Sacto Commie lifers pass a budget with a vote of 50% plus one. No more 2/3rds supermajority needed, so the Commie Dems can now pass a budget without a single Republican vote, another small step for government another giant step for tyranny. You think taxes may go up? Yeah ya think??? And often? Why, I ask --- do we even need a Republican or opposition party anymore? Truth is, we don't. There is no opposition. That single-party parliamentary-style deal has worked so well in countries like Cuba, North Korea, China, and Russia. It might work here just as well.

So, California, I no longer feel sorry for you, you did it to yourselves, and you get what you deserve. You have given up you right to complain, and likely all of your other rights as well. You have turned the state of California into Greece, and now you've wasted your last, best chance to correct it before the train wreck. We've finally reached the tipping point. That's where the statist, big tyrannical government-loving weenies and the socialist hand-out welfare crowd are able to vote themselves stuff at the expense of those few remaining folks who actually try to produce something in our society. I just feel sorry for myself, for my family and for my friends. But I don't feel sorry for the rest of you jerks who made this sorry likelihood possible. Remember when government plunder exists, tyranny exists.

In all fairness though, you really couldn’t help it, you have been brainwashed by the Caleeeforneea State system of indoctrination, and are incapable of original thought. Or, in words that you might be able to understand, ‘you’re a bunch of robotic commie idiots’.

I hope you're happy with yourselves…

de Andréa

Monday, November 22, 2010

Your Warm Fuzzy Peaceful Tolerant Muslims In Action

The latest toll from the massacre of Christians in Iraq attending a church service in Baghdad in late October has now reached 58 dead and 78 wounded.

By de Andréa

The attack by Muslims on the congregation of Our Lady of Salvation Catholic Church was the bloodiest single attack on an Iraqi Christian church in recent history. Moreover now that the U.S. has decided that the war in Iraq is over [???] there will be more and more of this until all Christians have been driven out or exterminated. How do I know this? It is because this is the Muslim program that has been repeated over and over again throughout history. If you want to read this programmed agenda you can read it in their books called the Quran and the Hadith.

In responding to the attack, the White House issued a ‘generic political’ statement, saying the “United States strongly condemns this senseless act of hostage taking and violence by terrorists linked to al-Qaida in Iraq that occurred in Baghdad killing so many innocent Iraqis.” ‘There’… that should put a stop to that… The thing of it is, the White House did not even mention the fact that the victims were Christians or that it happened while they had been attending church. I guess the fact that the Muslim agenda is as it was with Nazism, to exterminate all Christians and Jews and all infidels (non Muslims) is irrelevant.

For Nina Shea, a commissioner on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and the director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, “the White House response was extremely political correct and uncaring.” Thank you Nina, but if everyone in America wasn’t so blind we wouldn’t be surprised. The reason for the uncaring attitude of the White House Nina is that the one who occupies the White House is himself a Muslim with the same Agenda. Watch and listen to him say so…

A prominent American Jewish leader said this:
“We are stunned by the barbarity of this onslaught. We share the grief of the survivors, the families of victims, and our many friends in Christian communities worldwide,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. “But we are also outraged by the indifference of the international community. The only thing more outrageous than the systematic slaughter of families gathered in their place of worship is the overwhelming silence at this heinous act,” he added. Bravo Rabbi…

As Americans went to the polls in November, hundreds of mourners gathered at St. Joseph Chaldean church in Karrada, the same Baghdad neighborhood where Sunday’s attack took place.
Chaldean Patriarch Emmanuel III Delly, head of the largest Christian denomination in Iraq, said “They came to church to pray to God and fulfill their religious duty, but the devil’s hand entered the holy place to kill,” AFP reported. Oh! He may not know how right he is. He called the attack “another catastrophic blow that is likely to hasten the church’s wholesale flight from the country.”

The head of the Chaldean church in Jordan, Father Raymond Moussali, warned a recent Vatican synod of Middle East church leaders that Jihadi Muslims were waging “a deliberate campaign to drive out the Christians” from Iraq. He said. “There are Satanic plans by extremist fundamentalist groups against Christians not only in Iraq, but in all the Middle East.”

By most estimates, half of Iraq’s Christians have been forced to flee their homes since 2003. John Eiber, the CEO of Christian Solidarity International-USA, warns that Iraq’s Christians are “on the verge of extinction” because of Jihadi violence.

Joseph Kassab, executive director of the Chaldean Federation of America, says that his organization is “calling for the international community to intervene in protecting and saving the indigenous people of Iraq, the Chaldean Assyrian Syriac Community,” since there is no Iraqi government to take charge of internal security.

Note: Contrary to what you might have come to understand, Iraq was not always a Muslim nation. As a mater of historical fact none of the Middle Eastern people with the exception of the Meccan’s was either Arab or Muslim until long after the year AD 610. As Joseph Kassab says they were Chaldean, Assyrian, Jews, and Persians etc. Their religion was either Jewish, Pagan, or Christian. Not Muslim…

Islam of today is no different than it has always been, a people programmed from birth to carry out the agenda of Allah to Islamizes the world, country by country, and people by people until the Caliphate of Allah rules the world. This is the belief of all Muslims not just the so-called extremists.

“Things are deteriorating very fast in Iraq, our people are left with no choice but to flee because they are losing hope and there is no serious actions taken to protect them as of today,” Kassab said.

One curious demand of the jihadi Muslims, who seized control of the church, was that Egyptian Coptic Christian monasteries release Muslim girls they allegedly had taken captive. The rumors that Egyptian Copts have kidnapped girls said to have converted from Christianity to Islam has been spread by popular Muslim clerics in Egypt and picked up by Al Jazeera television. This is a Muslim lie, Christians do not convert to Islam. The rumors have fueled anti-Christian riots and attacks on all churches in the Middle East.

While the Vatican synod convened by Pope Benedict XVI was intended to promote the unity of the Christian and Muslims in the Middle East and to help anchor the Christian population in the region, it ended with a condemnation of Israel rather than overt criticism of Muslim governments. Even the Pope is deceived.

According to Hudson Institute scholar Paul Marshall, ”These incidents show that more extreme forms of Islam are still growing in the Muslim world, even in countries such as Egypt, often regarded as moderate,” Paul Marshall of the Hudson Institute is a senior fellow in the Center for Religious Freedom. He has held several professorships, including at the University of Toronto, the Free University of Amsterdam, and the Institute for Christian Studies, Toronto. He has taught political science, law, philosophy, and theology. He holds a B.Sc. (Geology) from the University of Manchester, an M.Sc.(Geochemistry) from the University of Western Ontario, an M.Phil. (Philosophy) from the Institute for Christian Studies, Toronto, and an M.A. and Ph.D. (Political Science) from York University, with further studies in international human rights law at the University of Strasbourg and theology at Oxford University. Marshall is also the author and editor of over twenty books on religion and politics, especially religious freedom.

I tell you all of this about Mr. Marshall because with or without all of his degrees BA’s, BS, PhD’s and MA’s, he tragically knows virtually nothing about Islam. How do I know this? Because of the quote ”These incidents show that more extreme forms of Islam are still growing in the Muslim world, even in countries such as Egypt, often regarded as moderate.” Four words that he uses, that he would never be quoted as saying in that context if he knew fundamental Islam, and that is…extreme, form, growing, and moderate. First there is no extremism in Islam; no Muslim extremists anymore than there were/are any Nazi extremists or Christian extremists for that matter. One is either a Muslim or one is not… The next is the use of the word form, “more extreme forms” as Mr. Marshall refers to Islam. There is only one form of Islam and it is well documented in the Quran and the Hadith if anyone would just take the time to read them. Growing, referring again to the nonexistent extremism. The only thing growing in Islam are Muslims soon to be 2 Billion nearly one third of the worlds population. And then there are the fictitious “Moderates”, which of course also assumes that there must be extremists. There can’t be any moderates if there aren’t any extremists. So you see all this deception depends on the one fundamental mistake, that there must be just a very few extremists. The rest are... well...I don't know, I guess warm fuzzy peacful moderats that just want to kill you a little bit.

THE BOTTOM LINE: “Muslim Extremist” as well as "Moderate Muslim" are terms made up by the Judeo Christian West who just can’t bring themselves to believe that a “Religion” could be ‘so’ fundamentally evil and full of hate as to indoctrinate a people to torture and murder. To exterminate their fellow human beings, until all that remains in the world are Muslims who will then torture and murder each other. Islam is fundamentally evil because nothing good can come out of Hell.

To people in the Western culture this is just incomprehensible. So we create in our minds a fantasy of a loving peaceful religion that we can relate to that has been hijacked by just a very few bad people we call extremists. Truth be known, there is no love or peace in Islam. A loving god is not found in any Islamic doctrine. This is because Allah is the Angel of hate and of death; (Satan is one of his other many names) this is why they worship death, and hate the infidel.

By creating this lie of extremism about the very fundamental basis of Islam, everything we build on that lie is a lie, such as different forms, a growing extremism, or a moderate Muslim. What is a moderate Muslim, a moderate Nazi, or a moderate Christian for that matter? Christians all have the same book, so fundamentally all Christians are the same, just different flavors of the same candy. Would a ‘moderate Nazi’ kill a Jew just moderately? Or do ‘moderate Muslims’ want only to cut of your arms and legs not your head.

We refer to extremists as fundamentalists as if the rest of Islam has no foundation. This is absurd and a lie, its one of those feel-good things that is supposed to warm your tummy. But it will eventually get us killed.

The God of all creation, the God of life, is a loving God and would never teach murder and extermination of a people just because they are different. But the word of Allah does, because Allah is the Angel of death and hate and it is taught in is word. The Agenda of Islam taught in Allah’s Quran and his prophet Muhammad’s Hadith, is to bring about a Muslim world of tyranny, hate and eternal death, while the agenda of Christianity is to tell the good news of eternal life through the love of Jesus Christ.

What do ‘you’ choose?

de Andréa

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Is TSA Screening Useless

Is there a better way, a more effective, and sensible way to detect a terrorists plot to blow up or hijack one of our commercial airplanes? It may just be common sense…

Action alert: By de Andréa

The invasive screening procedures demanded by the Obama-run Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will do almost nothing to stop a determined terrorist because the robotically programmed Muslim terrorists are already experimenting with inserting explosives in a body cavity or even having the destructive charges surgically implanted inside their bodies. What’s more they will never stop unless ‘we’ pull their plug.

Moreover Islamic terrorist organizations right here in America are demanding Exemption From Security At Airports claiming it violates their First Amendment religious rights.
Note:
By the way the bear on the right 'is not' a good example of a terrorist.

First off what comes to mind is, that we are ignorantly being responsive to terrorist attacks in America, in other words --- reactionary rather than strategic. One cannot win a football game using only the defensive team. If we are going to prevent another 9/11 or worse, perhaps several simultaneous 9/11’s, then we are going to have to dispense with making nice with our warm fuzzy terrorists friends and get aggressive, and be offensive.

Example: When the shoe bomber tried to blow up one of our planes we began checking shoes, when the underwear bomber attempted to blow himself up along with hundreds of passengers we began checking everyone’s undies etc. This is reactionary and in the future, it will be totally ineffective.
Note: The picture now on the right 'is ' a good example of a terrorist. But then were not allowed to profile. This is one of the resons that we remain blind and decieved. We can't identify who our enemy is.
While we become more and more sophisticated in our technology in detecting weapons smuggling, the terrorists are way ahead of us in their concealment.

Some of the following comments come from Brigitte Gabriel, who is the founder of Act! For America, a national 150,000-strong group that works 24/7 to warn Americans and our government against the dangers of the Muslim agenda. She is also a member of the board of advisers for the Intelligence Summit, and she lectures internationally on global terrorism.

This issue has hit a flashpoint in the last few days as newly installed TSA procedures demand that airline passengers submit to a full-body scanning machine that generates an essentially nude image of the passenger for TSA workers to see, or a full-body pat-down that includes what critics have called "groping" of passengers private parts.

"These procedures are not effective at all with terrorists," Brigitte said in an interview with WorldNetDaily. "If a true terrorist wants to go blow up an airplane, these machines will not detect it."

She said as drug dealers already have proven, substances hidden inside body cavities or even embedded surgically remain undetected by any or all of the TSA's procedures and fancy hardware.

"If al-Qaida is planning against the U.S. multiple attacks in a day, in multiple airplanes, it could duplicate 9/11," she said. "Al-Qaida is testing inserting and stuffing breast implants with explosives." A woman then would go into an airplane restroom and use a syringe similar to those used by diabetic patients to trigger an explosion that would disintegrate a modern jet. "This is what al-Qaida is resorting to, and they're exploring surgery for men," she warned. "They want to implant explosives inside the body”.

Read a WorldNetDaily article titled “Bosom Bombers” At that time, it was revealed in a special report that intelligence agents for Britain's MI5 service found that Muslim doctors trained at some of Britain's leading teaching hospitals had returned to their own countries to fit surgical implants filled with explosives. We are training our own enemy to destroy us. This is the result of ignorantly allowing ones enemy to live freely in ones own country. This is the same stupid mistake that led to the 9/11 attack. The blindness to this reality boggles my mind.

The report documented that women suicide bombers recruited by al-Qaida were known to have had the explosives inserted in their breasts under techniques similar to breast enhancing surgery. The lethal explosives – usually PETN (pentaerythritol Tetrabitrate) are inserted during the surgery inside the plastic shapes. The breast is then sewn up totally immune to TSA detection.

The report said similar surgery has been performed on male suicide bombers. In their cases, the explosives are inserted in the area of the appendix or in a buttock. Both are parts of the body that diabetics use to inject themselves with their prescribed drugs.

The report at the time quoted Jonathan Evans, head of MI5, saying, "A Properly inserted implant would be virtually impossible to detect by the usual airport scanning machines. You would need to subject a suspect to a sophisticated deep X-ray. Given that the explosive would be inserted in a sealed plastic sachet, and would be a small amount, it would make it all the more impossible to spot it with the usual body scanner."

Experts confirmed in the report that a sachet containing as little as five ounces of PETN when activated would blow "a considerable hole" in a jet airliner, guaranteeing a crash.

The dreaded politically incorrect “P” word

Brigitte Gabriel, who has addressed former Australian Prime Minister John Howard, members of the U.S. Congress, the Joint Forces Staff College, the U.S. Special Operations Command, the FBI and members of the British Parliament. Said the only accurate way to spot terrorists is to use “profiling techniques,” the same techniques used in Israel, which despite being a major target for terrorism, has a substantially safe airline industry.

"They know how to profile, and ask the right questions. This is what it's going to take," she said. "We need to throw political correctness in the garbage where it belongs. This is the time for the public to rise up and demand public officials to come up with ways to identify the threats by name. Our survival depends on it.”

Brigitte Gabriel, author of the New York Times best-seller “Because they hate” and growing up in Lebanon in an underground bunker is a survivor of Islamic terror herself. She warns America as she writes her second book “They Must Be Stopped” why we must defeat radical Islam and how we can do it. Brigitte was a news anchor for "World News," in Israel, the Arabic evening news broadcast for Middle East Television seen throughout Israel, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. She covered the Israeli withdrawal from Central Lebanon, the Israeli Security Zone and the Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza. Her work was international in scope, bringing her in contact with world figures such as Margaret Thatcher, George H. Bush Sr., Itshak Rabin, Shimon Perez and Ariel Sharon. Moving to the U.S. in 1989 she founded a television production company that eventually worked closely with "The Today Show," "Oprah," "Dr. Phil" and others.

She said: “Terror experts in Israel are trained to watch for eye movements, breathing rates and other physical indicators. Even something as simple as a cologne or perfume can be an indicator, because terrorists essentially are preparing themselves to enter the after life.

Those factors can pinpoint a potential terrorist whether they are dark-skinned and named Mohammed or they are six-foot-tall, blue-eyed, and blonde, or holders of American passports.

The current TSA demands insult our intelligence. It's nothing more than feel good window dressing… The American public must come together and revolt against these procedures. The Obama administration has failed in identifying our problem. The administration is not paying attention to terrorism."

She called out Obama even for his decisions to eradicate references such as Islamic terrorist and jihad. “How on earth can we win against the Jihadists if we are afraid to identify them by name," she said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is true, we don’t even know who or what our enemy is. America is at war, not only in the Middle East but a surreptitious war right here in our own front yard and we are too blind and deceived to see it.

Muslims are robotically programmed from birth; they are indoctrinated, conditioned, and trained to blow themselves up, to become suicide bombers. They are ready to die and to go to hell to meet their god Allah. Of course they have also been deceived and programmed into believing it is heaven that they are going to.

Brigitte goes so far as to say: “The Obama administration has failed in identifying our problem. The administration is not paying attention to terrorism.” I can be a little more direct than Brigitte and say that Obama has purposely failed to identify the problem and is contributing as much as he can get away with, to promote terrorism as a vehicle toward achieving the agenda of Islam which is to make America into a Western Islamic State.

Why do I say that? First, because I can, and with 21 years of Middle Eastern Studies, I know Islam, and second, because I know Obama, and you should too. Since before he ran for president I told you he was a Muslim. Listen and watch him tell you himself that “America is no longer a Christian nation --- that it is now a Muslim nation and ‘he’ is one of them.” This must be a top secret or highly classifies video, because few people seem to know or understand this.

Do you want America to be an Islamic State as Obama says it already is? Do you want to live under the tyranny of Islamic Sharia? Do you want to live with the threat of terrorism the rest of your life and your children and grandchildren’s lives? I hope you said NO !!! If you did, then you can do something about it…

Please will you Join more than 150,000 others in a petition demanding action against these intrusive airport screening procedures implemented by Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano and then, send a letter to Congress, President Obama and others telling them exactly what you think about the issue. This ‘is’ by the way, one of the best ways to let your government know what you are thinking. Every single individual contact with a government official represents one thousand contacts, because they know that only one in one thousand will take the time or make the effort. So take a few minutes represent a thousand of your fellow citizens, sigh this petition, and send this letter to Congress and the President. And tell them you don’t want to live under the tyranny of a pseudo security system you want to protect America for Americans who love this country.

As president John F Kennedy once said: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

This is your chance to do something for your country. Moreover, you might want to treat is as if it were your last and only chance…

de Andréa

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Muslims Want Exemption From Security At Airports

Isn’t it ironic that the whole reason for the TSA security at airports is because of the Muslim threat of bombs and hijackings, and now Muslims are ‘demanding’ to be EXEMPT from this security…?

By de Andréa

If you are outraged by the new “full-body scan” by the TSA at Airports, it is certainly understandable as an invasion of personal privacy, but Muslims are objecting…when they and their so-called religion of peace/murder are the cause of all this inconvenience.

(CNSNews.com) - CAIR, The Council on American-Islamic Relations has issued a travel warning to Muslim airline passengers on U.S. aircraft in response to the Transportation Safety Administration’s “enhanced pat down” policy that went into effect in late October. Taking off shoes, belts and jewelry, removing coats, taking computers out of their cases or removing any trace of metal from pockets, and being subjected to all over pat downs full body x-ray scans and tests for explosives, all because of Muslim bombings and Hijackings.

This is the ordeal every passenger flying on a commercial airline in America has to endure, thanks to past Muslim terrorist acts and the threat of future acts.

I am sure you’ll be pleased to learn that in February the Fiqh Council of North America issued a fatwa, (a religious ruling), that full-body scanners now used at many airports violate Shariah law and therefore Muslims are exempt for religious reasons under the First Amendment.

CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, has endorsed this fatwa and issued a travel warning telling Muslim women that they have the right to object to “enhance pat downs.”

Remember, it is CAIR’s Oklahoma affiliate director that filed the law suit to block Oklahoma’s prohibition of the use of Shariah law in courts passed this November. Read article titled “Terrorists Sue Oklahoma”. It was CAIR’s co-founder, Omar Ahmad, who said in 1998 that “he wanted the Quran to be highest authority in America”,[and replace the U.S. Constitution].

CAIR’s latest action should remove any doubt. CAIR’s real agenda is the imposition of Shariah legal tyranny in America.

CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans and searches for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a special recommendation for Muslim women who wear a hijaab, telling them “they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck”.

In the “special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijaab,” it states: “Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”

It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”

The new TSA pat-downs involve a “head-to-toe” screening techniques following recent airliner bombing attempts. Passengers who reject a full-body scan or who are selected for secondary screening may be searched using the enhanced pat-down.

“Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives,” a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others.”

Posted on its Web site under “TSA’s Head-to-Toe Screening Policies,” the policy reads “how people are dressed may lead to closer inspection, including baggy or loose clothing. Those policies also include individuals being searched by a professional of the same sex. It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner.”

In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, (religious ruling), full-body scanners violate Islamic law and are absolutely forbidden.

“It is a violation of clear Islamic law and teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: Don’t be deceived with all the religious shucking and jiving. This has nothing to do with religion, Sharia has nothing to do with religion, moreover, Islam has nothing to do with religion. This has everything to do with the ideological agenda of Islam to remake America into an Islamic State. What is happening now in Europe, Canada, America and all western civilization is Stealth Jihad, the surreptitious infiltration of Islam into the host countries. They are and will do anything to get their Sharia foot in the door of western culture, and tie up the legal system in the web of Sharia. Once every facet of the host country is being choked with the infiltration of Islam, MILITANT JIHAD WILL BEGIN. This, my friend is right out of the ‘Muslim Play Book’, it is called the Hadith and has be done over and over throughout history, it is how all independent countries have and will became Islamic States.

If the same thing is done over and over again, one should expect the same result, ‘over and over again’… But, I guess…that takes the ability of original thought.
de Andréa

Monday, November 15, 2010

Terrorists Sue Oklahoma

Show down with Islam --- Will Sharia law be the system of legal tyranny in America? This just may be a modern reenactment of the shoot out at O K corral.

By de Andréa

Referring to my previous article titled Election Results - Okalahoma Votes ‘No’ on Sharia law The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) may wish it never filed suit to overturn an Oklahoma ban on Shariah law. Now the entire nation will get to see the Islamic terrorist true ‘anti-American’ colors. Moreover we will all get to see if our justice system will hold up against the Muslim agenda of legally establishing Sharia law in the U.S. as they have done all over Europe.
CAIR is doing an ape like chest beating over persuading a Clinton-appointed federal judge to temporarily block Oklahoma from enacting a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering Islamic law when deciding cases. Fully 70% of Oklahoma voters passed the landmark measure in November. We will see if the will of the people prevails over that of this invading enemy of freedom and justice.

CAIR just may have ignited a legal firestorm that could rage all the way to the Supreme Court. Thanks to CAIR's latest bit of law-fare, Americans will get to hear a long overdue debate not just about the constitutionality of such bans on Shariah law but about the constitutionality, recognition, and legitimacy of Shariah law itself. This may not be a debate that CAIR wants to have; this may just be a slippery slope for Islam since it ultimately will have to defend the indefensible. CAIR claims in a press release that Shariah law is "a dynamic legal framework" derived from Islamic scripture "and analytical reasoning,” when in fact, there's nothing reasoned about it. It is in fact a medieval legal code that administers cruel and unusual punishments such as stonings, amputations, so-called honor killings, and Gestapo type tyranny.

Shariah can be seen in action this week with Pakistan's death sentence on a Christian woman for blasphemy. Between 1986 and 2009, at least 974 people have been murdered for defiling the Quran or insulting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad. CAIR, which considers free speech to be a one-way street, has worked with the Organization of the Islamic Conference and recently passed an international blasphemy law with the UN that criminalizes "Islamophobia," read the book, "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." Shariah also permits wife-beating. Its sister organization, the Islamic Society of North America, condones it in its fatwah (religious rulings) for Muslim Americans. Moreover, CAIR distributes a book, "The Meaning of the Holy Quran," which authorizes men to beat or kill their wives and children for violating Sharia.

CAIR disguises it as just a "civil rights advocacy group.” But the Justice Department says it's a front group for Terrorist Hamas and its parent, the Muslim Brotherhood, in a worldwide Jihadist movement that has a secret plan to impose Shariah law in the U.S. as well as the rest of the world.
"From its founding by Muslim Brotherhood leaders, CAIR conspired with other affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood such as the Muslim Holyland Foundation to support terrorists," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg in a recent court filing. U.S. prosecutors in 2007 named CAIR a co-conspirator in a criminal scheme led by the Holyland Foundation to funnel millions of U.S. dollars to Hamas suicide bombers and their families. And it still enjoys tax free charitable status from the IRS. All Muslim so-called charities are nothing but collection points and money laundering organizations to support the agenda of Islamic Jihad and tyranny.
"CAIR has been identified by the government at federal trial as a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization, a conspiracy from which CAIR never withdrew," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Jacks, who recently won an award from Attorney General Eric Holder for convicting the Holy Land terrorists.
Federal courts found "ample evidence" linking CAIR to the conspiracy and should unseal the dossier in coming weeks, but don’t hold your breath.
The Holyland revelations prompted the FBI to sever ties with CAIR until it can demonstrate it's not a terror front. "Until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and Hamas, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner," advised Assistant FBI Director Richard Powers in a 2009 letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee. This blatantly speaks to the ignorance of the FBI as to what Islam really is. Most Westerners lack the understanding that all Muslins are robotically programmed from birth with Sharia and the agenda of Islam to destroy civilized culture as we know it, and resurrect the 12th Caliphate of Muhammad to rule the world. Muslims cannot just individually decide to change their entire philosophy or program anymore than a computer can. They don’t have as we do a free thinking ability to choose.

Just as a side note, ‘yours truly’ sent enough evidence to the FBI in 2004 to at the very least warrant a full scale grand jury investigation into CAIR’s terrorist connections. The evidence was ignored because CAIR had infiltrated the FBI to the degree that it was considered the FBI’s poster child of a warm fuzzy moderate middle of the road well assimilated Muslim organization.

CAIR's leaders don't want a ban on Shariah law, because they have a secret agenda to institutionalize Shariah law in America. "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be an Islamic State sometime in the near future," CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper let that slip out to a Minneapolis Star-Tribune reporter in 1993, before CAIR was fully formed.

CAIR's founding chairman, Omar Ahmad, will not stop until Shariah law replaces the Constitution. “Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,” he told a Muslim audience in Fremont, Calif., in 1998. “The Quran should [and will] be the highest authority in America,” he said.

CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad is an Islamic supremacist who says Muslims should run Washington: “Who better can lead America than Muslims?” he said. Well guess what? they already do, under the leadership of your Muslim President Barack Hussein Obama and all of his Muslim Czars.

Islamizing America is the agenda of the Cairo-based outlaw group the Muslim Brotherhood, that some in government who have awaken from their deception say CAIR is fronting for. The founding archives of its U.S. branch, seized in an FBI raid and introduced as evidence in the Holyland trial, reveal a "strategic goal of eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within [infiltration] and sabotaging its miserable house ... so that Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions [and governments].” The Brotherhood calls its plan a “grand jihad.” CAIR argues in its suit “the Shariah ban's purpose is to stigmatize, denigrate, and segregate plaintiff's faith in the public's mind as something foreign and to be feared.”

Wrong, oh grand Mufti, the ‘goal’ is to make sure no Oklahoma judge considers Shariah law in rulings on domestic violence, family law, probate, free speech, contracts and any other such legal matters as judges have in other states such as New Jersey, Minnesota, Tennessee and Michigan to name a few. Moreover this blind stupidity is practiced to a wider degree in Canada and on a routine basis in Britain. The state of Texas for example sports its first Sharia Court, the foot is in the door, and they will soon be in our house. The Oklahoma ban is to prevent courts from legitimizing a Satanic Muslim legal system antithetical to the U.S. Constitution in every area of freedom of speech, equality, and humane punishment, among other Judeao Christian Western principles.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thanks to CAIR's lawsuit, all this may now be aired out for the first time in a public American court. Oh, by the way, Sharia courts are not open to the public…but the death sentence of stoning, amputation and the execution of beheading is.

de Andréa

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Islamic Sharia in America

Twenty years ago I warned that America would kowtow to Islamic Sharia Law. And just as I warned five years ago that America would elect a Muslim president, today we have both. Don’t ever doubt me!

By de Andréa

National Public Radio NPR’s sacking of Juan Williams was more than a politically correct act. It was anti-American, it was the latest in a series of media and political groveling and capitulations to Sharia law to make nice with the enemy of America. If you support NPR you support Islamic terrorism and the enemy of America.

The essence of what Mr. Williams said was just the expression of a personal fear that he had when he boarded an airplane that included Muslims dressed in their traditional garb.

A central provision of Sharia law is its prohibition against speech that can be construed as “defaming” Islam or the prophet Mohammed. Where Sharia is practiced and enforced, such “defamation” is a criminal offense that is punishable by death. In other words if you don’t appreciate the tyranny of Islamic law then you are condemned to death according to Sharia, whether you are an infidel or a Muslim. Don’t these bells ring kind of like the bells of Nazism? And we never considered Nazism to be a protected religion, a philosophy maybe, an ideology yes, but not a religion and neither is Islam.

What we in America take for granted, as free speech is a capital crime in Islam. Moreover Islam exists, wherever there are Muslims.

Islamists around the world are imposing Sharia’s muzzling of free speech on free societies. The Organization of the Islamic Conference, composed of 56 Islamic States, has won passage of a United Nations resolution ordering member countries to criminalize speech that “defames” religion—clearly referring to Islam specifically. After all, does anyone really expect countries like Saudi Arabia to criminalize speech that “defames” Judaism or Christianity?

Criminalizing speech that is deemed “defamation” of Islam is tantamount to de facto enactment of Sharia law. The law may have a different name or description, such as prohibiting “hate speech,” but the effect on speech is the same as if Sharia law has taken precedence over our own constitution.

The Netherlands, Germany, England, and Austria are some of the countries where such de facto “Sharia-compliant” laws are in effect. Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders for example is currently on trial for publicly criticizing Islam. Austrian Parliamentarian Susanne Winter was tried and convicted of a similar “crime” in early 2009. And just last week Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, an Austrian who is an ACT! for America member and chapter leader in the international program, will go on trial there for allegedly transgressing the same Sharia law.

When newspapers around the world, including most in America, refused to publish the satirical Mohammed cartoons, capitulation to de facto Sharia law occurred. The ostensible reason was to avoid “offending” or “inflaming” the Muslim world. The practical effect was a widespread media self-censorship that was every bit as much a compliance with Sharia law as if Sharia law were the actual law of the land.

Muslims and Islamic organizations such as the terrorist organization who calls itself the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) argue that such self-censorship is necessary because without it “Islamophobia” will continue to rise. But there is more here than the obvious.

Immediately after Juan Williams’ appearance on The O’Reilly Factor, CAIR swung into action and demanded that NPR “address” what Juan Williams said, and is now suing Fox News and NPR.

Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR spokesman, appeared on Megyn Kelly’s program on Fox News to defend CAIR’s actions. Tellingly, Hooper failed to reiterate his comment made in a 1993 article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, in which he said, “I wouldn’t want to give the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be an Islamic State sometime in the near future.”

CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad expressed a similar sentiment in 1998 when he was quoted in two California newspapers maintaining, “the Koran should be the highest authority in America.”

In other words, he wants Sharia law, not the Constitution, to be the supreme law of the land and he is doing everything he can to bring that about.

Legitimate fears by non-Muslims speak directly to what Juan Williams was expressing. Don’t shut down free speech. Instead, we should encourage more speech that candidly addresses the threat of Islam and what that threat means to Americans.

It’s clear that NPR decided to make an example of Juan Williams for crossing a line into the Forbidden Zone of political correctness when he spoke out on the “sensitive” issue of Islam. But NPR’s action transcends the boundaries of political correctness. As newspapers did when they self-censored cartoon renderings of the prophet Mohammed, NPR sent an unmistakable message to Islamists worldwide that Sharia law, even when not formally the law of the land, trumps our First Amendment Right.

THE BOTTOM LINE: What most people in the west don’t understand is that this encroachment of Sharia in western cultures is a strategy completely laid out in the Muslim book “Hadith”. Moreover the Muslims are programmed to carry out this agenda of world domination by using these strategies of surreptitious infiltration. It is called “Cultural Jihad”. It is a Strategy use reputedly throughout history. This strategy coupled with the doctrine of “Taqiyyah” (‘deception’ in English) is the same strategy that has been used to take control of every country that is now an Islamic State. Muslims simply use the culture and laws of the host nation against them; moreover as in this case of free speech they get the people of the host nation to carry out the Muslim agenda of introducing Sharia themselves. We are contributing to our own demise.

How does this happen? Mostly ignorance, the rest is deception. One simply needs to buy a Quran and a Hadith and read. Studying these books from a western prospective will cause a greater understanding than a Muslim Imam. Why? Because Muslims are indoctrinated not educated and are even more deceived than you are.

Educate yourselves and help save our children from Islamic tyranny…

de Andréa

Saturday, November 06, 2010

Election Results - Okalahoma Votes ‘No’ on Sharia law


Not surprising you say! Read on my friend…

By de Andréa

It largely went unnoticed amid the story of the Republicans winning back the U.S. House and making significant gains in the Senate. But Oklahoma voted yes to stop Sharia on State Question 755.

SQ 755 was a state constitutional amendment that will ‘prohibit’ Oklahoma courts from using Sharia law in deciding legal court cases. It passed overwhelmingly with 70% support! Not surprising you say! Think again my friend…

The scary part is that this outcome (while it should have been) was by no means a foregone conclusion. On October 7th, less the a month before, a poll was released with these results on SQ 755: only 45% were in favor of stopping Sharia, 25% opposed, and 30% undecided. If the 30% undecided’s would have voted against the initiative, Okalahoma would have fallen as Michigan, Texas, and New Jersey have, into the trap if Islamic deception and Sharia tyranny.
Although slightly confusing, a 'yes' vote on 755 was a 'no' vote for Sharia Law in the state of Okalahoma. But I really don’t believe that an Okie from Muskogee is really that easily confused.

Two major newspapers editorialized and organized against the initiative and (would you believe) ‘for’ Sharia law. CAIR, the (Council on American-Islamic Relations) the terrorist affiliate in Oklahoma spoke out repeatedly against it in the media with its shop-worn “Islamophobia” propaganda.

ACT! for America surmised that the high undecided percentage reflected voter misunderstanding of the issue AND confusion as to which way to vote on the initiative. And when voters are confused on a ballot initiative like this, they tend either not to vote on it or they ignorantly vote against it. This would have been tragic. It’s hard to know just how much of this confusion was do to the presentation of the initiative and how much was do to the lack of understanding about Islam in general. But 25% were going to vote for Sharia…Are there even 25% Muslims in Okalahoma? I don’t think so. And 30% of Oklahomans weren’t sure if the wanted to be subjected to the tyranny of Sharia or not…incredible but believable, because not only are Oklahomans deceived about Islam but America is blindly deceived, no… the entire West is deceived about Islam. No…Even Muslims are deceived about Islam.

Islam is not a religion it is a deception and there is nothing good in Islam for anyone not even Muslims.

So, On October 18th ACT! for America launched a two-week statewide radio ad in support of SQ 755. Then, on October 21st, 26th, and November 1st they dropped a total of 600,000 automated calls to Oklahoma voters with a message urging support of SQ 755 from James Woolsey, former director of the CIA who was replaced because he new to much about the agenda of Islam. In Addition, they placed an editorial in one of the state’s major newspapers, and sent multiple emails to ACT members, and conducted several radio and print media interviews.

The resulting 70% support not only demonstrates that the efforts to educate the voters to clear up any confusion were immensely successful, but how the previous polls show just how vulnerable we are to the advance if Islamic tyranny in America. The people of Oklahoma likely do not know just how close they came to the loss of their Constitutional rights as well as the future threat of being governed by the tyranny of Islamic Sharia.

This 70% victory was significant because this was the first time voters had a chance to vote in a statewide election on the issue of Sharia law. The overwhelming margin sends an unequivocal message to Islamic organizations and Muslims, such as Ground Zero Mosque Imam Rauf, who advocates Sharia law for America—once the people understand the tyranny of Sharia law it will not welcome here!

CAIR sues to block Oklahoma Sharia ban. CAIR’s real agenda revealed

Omar Ahmad, CAIR co-founder, quoted in the San Ramon Valley Herald,that the Oklahoma chapter of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) has filed suit to block implementation of State Question 755, known as the “Save Our State” amendment.

Islam is a deception:

Ahmad said “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran should be the highest authority in America.” However prior to the vote CAIR’s Oklahoma director had argued “SQ 755 was unnecessary because there was no chance Sharia was coming to Oklahoma”.

The CAIR lawsuit now confirms what CAIR leaders have said in the past—CAIR’s real agenda is the implementation of Sharia law in America.

Consider Omar Ahmad’s quote above. What is he actually saying? He is saying my friend, that Sharia law and Islam will govern America.

Not surprisingly, in recent years CAIR has been quiet about this agenda, but now that agenda has been smoked out by SQ 755, a measure which is not discriminatory nor inhibits the practice of religious Islam, but protects non-Muslims and Muslims alike from the tyranny of Islamic Sharia law.

Islam uses our own laws against us

Muneer Awad, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations's Oklahoma chapter, filed the suit in U.S. District Court to block officials from certifying the measure. Awad told the Wall Street Journal the measure violates the First Amendment right to practice religion without government intervention.

CAIR legal adviser Gadeir Abbas said SQ755 was "designed to stigmatize Muslims, to turn the Constitution of Oklahoma into a vehicle for oppressing a minority that is currently unpopular."

The "Save Our State Amendment" was proposed by Republican state Sen. Anthony Sykes, who said the amendment isn’t about persecuting Muslims but keeping the Oklahoma judiciary system from “sliding down a slippery slope.”

Former CIA Director Jim Woolsey, who worked to get the amendment passed, said on Fox and Friends this morning that it's about not allowing criminals to use religious code to circumvent the system when they're "prosecuted for beating or assaulting their wives or daughters." “What we really need to do is make sure people can’t void the impact of criminal law by citing their religious beliefs,” he said. A hearing is set for Monday.

As for the other election results, the most important consequence is that “the power of the gavel” will switch in the U.S. House of Representatives. By this I mean key committees, such as the Homeland Security Committee, will likely be chaired by Members of Congress who truly understand the threat Islam poses to our national security and who will have a different list of priorities regarding what bills to consider and hearings to hold.

The legislative calendar, controlled by the Speaker of the House, will also reflect different priorities regarding what bills to bring to a vote before the full House.

This is a MAJOR step forward in our legislative efforts on Capitol Hill. Bills we would have supported this year didn’t even get a committee hearing they will now receive the serious and thoughtful consideration they deserve. Prospects for House passage during the next two years of some of our legislative priorities have improved dramatically as a result of last Tuesdays election results.

Without question, most voters were making their decisions based on concerns about the economy, jobs, federal spending and ballooning deficits, and what became known as “ObamaCare.”

But as the exit polls I saw revealed, voter concerns about national security were lurking just beneath the surface. Americans are aware of the increase in homegrown jihadism and there is a small but growing consciousness about the threat of Sharia law.

These election results not only bode well for progress in the Congress on our legislative agenda, they also bode well for increased pressure on the Muslim Obama administration to adjust the way it is supporting the threat of Islamic terrorism.

de Andréa

Friday, November 05, 2010

Multiculturalism Has Failed

If multiculturalism was just an experiment then it is time to admit that it has failed. No surprise to me or anyone who knows a minimal amount of history but it seems that Germany is at least waking up to this fact. Will the U.S. wake up before it’s too late?

By de Andréa

Speaking at a meeting of young members of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Telegraph TV and reported by the Christian Science Monitor that it had proven not possible for people from different cultural backgrounds to simply live side by side in Germany, which is home to some four million Arab Muslims.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel told the Telegraph and the Christian Séance Monitor that “Multiculturalism has failed”, she states flatly, as she surveys Western Europe going down, under the tide of Islamic tyranny. Rather than a liberal society creating the utopia of harmonious cultural pluralism, it is being swallowed whole by a giant predator whose voracious mouth encourages, in the spirit of tolerance, to open ever wider in the unshakeable belief of western liberals that the jaws about to snap shut around their necks are actually stretched wide in a smile of peace.

All over mainland Europe, a few shoes are belatedly starting to drop – maybe too late.

France and Belgium have banned the burqa and other countries are debating doing the same. Switzerland has banned minarets. Denmark has imposed ferocious limits on immigration.

In the Netherlands the prosecution in the case against the Dutch politician Geert Wilders for allegedly inciting religious hatred -- through his criticism of Islamic hatred -- has thrown in the towel and asked the judges to acquit him of all charges. Click here for an authoritative analysis of the significance of this.

And what of Merry ole England, the country which in 1940 stood alone against the Islamic Nazi threat to democratic life and liberty and the values of the Western Judeao Christian culture? Is the shoe of reality starting to drop in the UK as well?

A report by Quilliam about City University, central London, states that a hard-line Islamist ideology is being promoted through the leadership of the university’s student Islamic Society, leading to increased religious tensions on campus and to the intimidation and harassment of staff, students and members of minority groups by Muslims and increasing the risks of students turning to terrorism.

Muslims kill everyone even other Muslims
Ahmadi Muslims in south London have been targeted by Islamists in a hate campaign, and a Muslim woman in Bradford has died after being set on fire (via JihadWatch), underlining the fact that Muslims are themselves front-line victims of Islamic jihadism and Sharia law. No one is safe from the tyranny of Islam.
And in the Sunday Telegraph, Andrew Gilligan continues to chronicle the remorseless takeover of an entire London borough, Tower Hamlets, by the terrorists of the Islamic Forum of Europe using intimidation, infiltration and corruption: A similar Islamic take over exists right now in Dearborn Michigan.

According to one of its own leaflets, the IFE – based at the hard-line East London Mosque in Tower Hamlets – wants to change the ‘very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed … from ignorance to Islam.’ The group is accused by one of the area’s Labor MPs, Jim Fitzpatrick, of infiltrating and ‘corrupting’ his party in a way similar to the Militant Tendency in the 1980s.

The response of other newspapers to what’s going on in Tower Hamlets? As far as I can make out, deafening silence. And what is the response of the rest of the British thinking classes to this and countless other signs of increasing Islamization and Islamic Jihad in Britain?

The hitherto resolutely counter-counter-cultural think-tank Civitas, which in the past has produced some outstanding social and cultural analysis, has just published a set of essays on Women, Islam and Western Liberalism in which one author, Alveena Malik, states that the full-face Islamic veil, or niqab, should be regarded and accepted ‘...as part of the modern British way of life.’

She continued: ‘The wearing of religious symbols, including the full veil, should be a fundamental human right of an individual in both the public and private sphere. The real test for religious symbols in the public sphere should always be: “Does the wearing of a symbol (such as the kirpan, turban, yarmulke, crucifix and or the veil) hinder a citizen’s ability to perform their public civic duties?”’ Britain is in a ‘unique’ position to embrace such a public display of faith because of the role the church plays in the affairs of the state and its [benevolent]‘multicultural diversity’.

To be fair, the Civitas pamphlet contains other views which profoundly disagree with this. Even so, the idea that advocating as ‘part of the British way of life’ the niqab, which presents such an obvious danger to security as well as intimidating non-radical Muslim women, inciting religious subversion by serving as a symbolic call to arms against western values and destroying the equality inherent in human interaction by virtue of the simple act that we can all see each other’s faces – the idea that this is, as Civitas appears to suggest, a contribution towards liberal diversity, is simply grotesque.

And here’s the thing: the Telegraph also reports:

Mrs Malik was appointed by the last government to a panel of faith advisers for the Department for Communities. She has overseen British Council guidance on ‘intercultural dialogue’. It looks horribly like, seventy years on, Britain is now once again alone -- this time, though, not standing, but grovelling on its knees before those Islamic Nazis bent upon the extinction of freedom.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So what does all this mean? And how does it effect the U.S.? Are these Islamic symbols really that dangerous? While remotely they could be, they are not the issue. The Burka and the like are just a smoke screen for Islamic Sharia law. If we in the west will accept all the Islamic traditions then we will eventually accept the tyranny of Sharia. Check out this video trailer America At Risk .
Is America at risk? My friend, the ‘World’ is at risk!

Weather this awakening of Europe is too late or not is problematic. I personally believe that if the true awakening of Europe ever does come it will be too late to stop the tyranny of Islam without a bloody fight in the streets. It will be called a civil war but it will be Islamic Jihad.

How does this effect America? What is happening in the U.S. ‘now’, was already happening in Europe 15 years ago. We will likely be where Europe is now in 10 years or less. Sharia law will take precedence over local law…oh! not just for Muslims, no, no, no for you and your family my friend. This is already the case in much of the state of Michigan, especially in Dearborn. The State of Texas has a Sharia Court. New Jersey rules in favor of Sharia in a domestic case. This is the way it was in the UK 15 years ago, today there are Sharia Courts all over London and the locals are tried in them if it involves a dispute with a Muslim. Eventually it won’t matter; everyone will obey Sharia or die.

The only thing stopping Islam from taking control of the world right now is the lack of organized leadership and that will be forthcoming. There are those that are still wondering how such a backward culture can take over the world or America for that matter. Well… they aren’t backward anymore, there are nearly 2 billion of them, nearly a third of the population of the world, and they worship death. They are unlike the rest of the world in everyway.

In 10 to 20 years all of Europe will be Islamic, or… it will be involved in a war for it’s survival.

We can still stop this from happening in America but we don’t have a lot of time. The longer we wait the bloodier the battle.

Throughout history a multicultural State has never worked, moreover, it isn’t working now. We still have a choice, to allow ourselves to be swallowed by this Islamic agenda of tyranny, or to reject this evil culture of satanic rule and return to the roots of Judeao Christian freedom.

Five years ago I predicted that the U.S. would have a Muslim president in 10 years. I was wrong, it was in 3 years. For those of you that are still deceived, listen to your president tell you, that he is a Muslim. “I am one of them”, he says.

The longer we wait, the more difficult it will be to climb out of this hell hole of Islam that patiently awaits us.

My mission is not to comfort, this is part of the problem, we are too comfortable in our prosperous deception. My mission is to shake you awake, to sound the alarm. Listen not to the enemy, but “listen to what the Spirit of God is saying to the Churches”. The Revelation of John…

de Andréa