Friday, June 26, 2009

Al-Qaida Speaks

DUBAI Al Jazeera television — Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al-Qaida in Afghanistan, speaks about Pakistani nukes in an interview with Al Jazeera television. When al-Qaida is in a position to do so, it will use Pakistan's nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States”, Mustafa Abu al-Yazid said in remarks aired on Sunday.

By de Andréa

I have been warning for the past four years about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal falling into the wrong hands, and trust me al-Qaida is the wrong hands.

Pakistan has been battling al-Qaida Taliban allies in earnest in the Swat Valley since April 09 after their thrust into a district 60 miles northwest of the capital raised fears the nuclear-armed country could slowly slip into militant hands.

"god willing, the nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of the Americans, but the mujahideen would take them and use them against the Americans," Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al-Qaida's in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television.

Abu al-Yazid was responding to a question about U.S. safeguards to seize control over Pakistan's nuclear weapons in case Islamist fighters came close to doing so. "We expect that the Pakistani army would be defeated (in Swat) . . . and that would be its end everywhere, god willing."

Asked about the group's plans, the Egyptian militant leader said: "The strategy of the (al-Qaida ) organization in the coming period is the same as in the previous period: to hit the head of the snake, the head of tyranny: the United States. That can be achieved through continued work on the open fronts and also by opening new fronts in a manner that achieves the interests of Islam and Muslims and by increasing military operations that drain the enemy financially."

The militant leader suggested that naming a new leader for the group's unit in the Arabian Peninsula, Abu Basir al-Wahayshi, could revive its campaign in Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter. "Our goals have been the Americans . . . and the oil targets which they are stealing to gain power to strike the mujahideen and Muslims. There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader."

Abu al-Yazid, also known as Abu Saeed al-Masri, said “al-Qaida will continue with large scale operations against the enemy" — by which he meant the United States.

"We have demanded and we demand that all branches of al-Qaida carry out such operations," he said, referring to attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The militant leader said “al-Qaida would be willing to accept a truce of about 10 years' duration with the United States if Washington agreed to withdraw its troops from Muslim countries and stopped backing Israel and the pro-Western governments of Muslim nations”.

Asked about the whereabouts of al-Qaida's top leaders, he said: "Praise god, sheikh Osama (bin Laden) and sheikh Ayman al-Zawahri are safe from the reach of the enemies, but we would not say where they are; moreover, we do not know where they are, but we're in continuous contact with them."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Straight from the horse’s mouth or in this case the ‘Pigs Mouth’, I wouldn’t want to insult horse lovers, pigs after all at least wallow in filth.

Four years ago when everyone was saying that the Pakistani government was stable and there was no chance of their nukes falling into ‘Terrorists Hands’, I said “every Middle Eastern country that exists, has fallen into terrorists hands”.

Here we are four years later nearly looking down the launch tube of a Muslim terrorist nuclear weapon. Moreover our eyes have been on Iran, who doesn’t yet have nuclear capability. If any one of these Muslim controlled countries achieves nuclear capability the west better head for the bomb shelters.

But there is an even more frightening message in this interview than ‘Nukes” and that is ‘Muslim Unity’. …”There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader.” A single leader… Until now Islam has been mostly splintered, with out unity. If Islam actually unites behind a “single leader”, well… you haven’t seen anything yet in the way of Islamic terrorism. A ‘United Islam’ is an extremely dangerous force to all living things.

The West represents the Judeao-Christian World, while the East represents the enemy of all Gods creation…

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Obama: Self Indicted

On Obama’s own campaign web site he indicates that "at birth" he was a citizen of Kenya and a subject of Great Britain.

By de Andréa

People ask me why I continue with this quixotic endeavor of this “Birth Certificate” nonsense, because it is becoming more and more bazaar that’s why. Many have also asked me about Obama’s possible motives for hiding it with such tenacity and diligence.

I think therein lies the real question. Not so much of where it is, but why are you hiding it?

Plausible reasons:
Perhaps something in his birth certificate, if it indeed exists, would contradict assertions Obama has already made about his life's story. These might even involve his true parental heritage. Without a real birth certificate, no one really knows who his parents were. So it may be futile even to speculate about whether citizenship could be conferred upon him by his mother, when we don't know for sure who his mother is. After all we only have his word for it, and just how good is Obammah’s word.

Perhaps the certification of live birth reveals a foreign birth, as was the practice in Hawaii in 1961 while still issuing the Hawaiian certification of live birth" we have seen posted on his website. Or perhaps it will show just what Obama has claimed all along – a birth in Hawaii to two officially non-citizen parents, for the purpose of establishing "natural born citizenship" under the Constitution.

What do I mean?
Well, as you know, in 2008, the Senate of the United States held hearings to determine if one of the presidential candidates fulfilled the requirement of being a "natural born citizen”. NO it wasn't Barack Obama. It was John McCain, who was born on a U.S. military base in the Canal Zone of Panama a US territory and Base, to two U.S. citizens.

On April 10 of last year, two senators, both Democrats, Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, introduced a resolution expressing a sense of the Senate that McCain was indeed a "natural born citizen."

It's interesting what Leahy had to say on the subject: "Because he was born to American citizens [emphasis added], there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the U.S. Senate."

And, indeed it was. It was also, interestingly, that it was the only such hearing held by the Congress on the subject of "natural born citizenship" and its application to the 2008 presidential race. Why was that interesting? Because everyone involved in this process knew – or should have known – that the life story told by Barack Obama would raise far more doubts about his eligibility than McCain's, and they didn’t want to open ‘Pandora’s Box’

Notice Leahy did not say one parent citizen would qualify a child for "natural born citizenship." He indicted it would take two.

He did so again at a Judiciary Committee hearing April 3, when he asked then-Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, a former federal judge, if he had any doubts about McCain's eligibility to serve as president.

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff responded – again underlining the fact that both parents would need to be citizens.

And what did Leahy say to that? "That is mine, too."

By the way, Obama voted for this resolution, so he obviously agrees with the definition of what constitutes a "natural born citizen" – the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

Now, I don't know who Barack Obama's parents are, because I have never seen his birth certificate. All I've seen is a facsimile of a "certification of live birth" on the Internet. That document, even if genuine, proves nothing about Obama's birth in Hawaii or who his parents were. Hawaii, just becoming state, had a very slipshod practice in 1961 of issuing these documents to babies born outside the country and listing parents who may not have been the parents at all. All it really indicates is that he was “Born”

But I do know who Barack Obama claims his parents were. According to him, neither one of them was an American citizen able to confer natural born citizenship on a child. First, Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign national from Kenya, and the other, Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son, even if the father had been a citizen and even in the unlikely event Obama was actually born in Hawaii!
So, even if we are to take Obama at his word, he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to serve as president.

If he is to be judged by the same standard as his opponent in the race, there is no way he qualifies. That's what Leahy said. That's what Chertoff said. That's what the law says.

A logical question naturally follows: Why didn't the Congress of the United States hold hearings on Obama's eligibility when they did so on McCain's eligibility?

I'm still trying to figure that one out. Maybe the answer is this simple: Because there's no way Obama would have qualified.

Another logical question follows: Why is this man still serving in the White House and turning the country upside down when he is not even constitutionally eligible? This is the reason I will never let go of this..

By the way, further establishing that it was impossible for Obama to have been a "natural born citizen" are some astonishing words found on his own campaign website. They indicate that Obama was "at birth" a citizen of Kenya and a subject of Great Britain, and that his Kenyan citizenship expired August 4, 1982.

So this answers the question as to why Obama registered as a foreign student at a collage in Los Angles Ca. and also what passport in used to go to Pakistan with in 1981. He was a Kenyan citizen and a British subject, as well as an Indonesian citizen which was required to attend school there.

So, an even bigger question of whether or not Obama was natural born, which it is fairly obvious that he was not, because of several probabilities, is the question of , is he now a citizen of the US, or is he as illegal as if he climbed the fence at the Mexican border?. Moreover, if he is a citizen when did he apply for legal status, green card etc???

So you see the plot thickens, and still no answers, just more and more Questions.

Why did the founders insist upon a "natural born citizen" clause in the Constitution?
To avoid questions of divided loyalties, and unless one is blind or brainwashed one can clearly see that Obama has not only devided loyalties but loyalties to our enemy.

Just scroll down on Obama’s Fight the Smears webpage and read the excerpt to see this amazing admission for yourself.

So, again, I ask: Why doesn't Obama want to reveal his real birth certificate? Because he wants this discussion of eligibility to go away – once and for all. It is a vulnerability he cannot explain away. So he would rather not discuss it at all.

But let me remind you all, in case you hadn't considered this: Obama plans to run for re-election in 2012.

That's why we can never, ever let this matter rest.

Stop Obama in 2012…

de Andrea

Monday, June 15, 2009

Are The Jews Waking Up?

Jewish organizations are ‘concerned’ about Obama’s schmoozing of Islam

By de Andréa

The deception of Islam has always fascinated me. Why a people would believe the same lies over and over again is truly a prodigious phenomenon. I could understand a few being deceived, but entire nations?

Talking about deception, and the phenomenal ‘degree’ of deception… in my studies of middle eastern Muslim culture which began in AD 610, (not my studies, but the culture) I soon discovered the most deceived people on earth about Islam are the Muslims However, it seems the closer a country is to Islam the more deceived the people are. One would logically conclude for example, that Lebanon would not be fooled by the consistent equivocation spewed out by the Muslim people and yet they benevolently took in the Jordanian terrorists refugees (the Hisbala) and today in the aftermath of the Jihad, Lebanon is now part of the Nation of Islam.

The Jews of Israel are another prime example. These same terrorist refugees from Jordan (only this time the Hamas) decided to call themselves Palestinians (a non historical people) and move in to the Gaza Strip and anywhere else that suited them (as long it was part of Israel) and say that this is their historical country “Palestine”. . The fact that Palestine is not a historical country never seemed to occur to anyone and today it is just taken for granted that these Jordanian terrorists are the nonexistent Palestinians from the nonexistent historical country unknown as Palestine, and what is even more incredible is that it deserves a country of its own which in totality belongs factually and historically to Israel.

Since then there has been numerous treaties between the Israelis and these terrorists, none of which has meant anything at all to the so-called Palestinians. And yet the Jews continue in their attempt to negotiate with the Devil. Are we stuck on stupid or are we just Ignorantly deceived?

But…then, right in the middle of the smoke screen there seems to be a dawning of questions by the Jewish community. President Obama’s strongest supporters among Jewish leaders are deeply troubled by his recent Middle East initiatives, and some are questioning what he really believes in. Is the vial of deception beginning to slip a little?

Malcolm Hoenlein, whose face resembles that of Dick Cheney at first glance, is executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. He says he is only offering his personal views but the conference he represents is a political powerhouse that includes 50 major Jewish groups. Among them are the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), B’nai B’rith International, the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, Hadassah, and the Anti-Defamation League. Hoenlein has been the professional head of the conference since 1986, overseeing its day-to-day activities as the coordinating body for American Jews on issues of concern in the U.S. and globally.

Jewish leaders “are expressing ‘concern’ Hoenlein said, about what was said [in Obama’s Cairo speech], “I’ve heard it from some of his strongest supporters. It’s expected from his detractors. But even people close to him have said to us that there were parts of the speech that bothered and confused them.”

Obama’s speeches to a Muslim audience in Saudi Arabia and Egypt in early June was his second effort early in his administration to rewrite and re-define America’s posture toward the Nation of Islam. In April, Obama traveled to Ankara, Turkey, to offer a similar outreach to Islam where he totally submitted himself and America to King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia by the traditional Muslim bow of submission from his waist to the waist of the king. This single jester of submission to Islam seems to be totally lost on the deceived people of the west.

But many in the Jewish community, including some of Obama’s most ardent supporters, are troubled by his comments in the Middle East, especially his remarks to his Cairo audience. Others are concerned that, facing a multitude of problems on the domestic front, Obama has nevertheless traveled twice to the Middle East without even setting foot in Israel, America’s stalwart ally in the region for more than a half-century.

“There is a lot of questioning going on about what he really believes and what does he really stand for???,” Hoenlein says of Obama’s outreach.

I wonder, is this the dawning of an age???

Reaction to Obama’s speech has drawn a range of reaction from many Jewish leaders. On the right, some have condemned it as a destructive revision of the long and close relationship between the U.S. and Israel. But many on the left who backed Obama were also surprised and dismayed over Obama’s speech. Such reactions from major Jewish leaders have largely remained beneath the surface, exchanged privately among them.

Hoenlein’s comments are his first detailed appraisal of Obama’s speech and represent the first time a major Jewish leader has spoken openly about the erosion of Jewish support for Obama.

Reacting to Obama’s Cairo speech, Hoenlein says, “I have no problem with addressing the Muslim world. I’m in fact in favor of outreach, and we here at the conference have done it for about 12 or 15 years, visiting Muslim countries in Central Asia and the Middle East. But the question is, what is the message they get? It’s not so much what he says, but how do they perceive what he says?” I can’t help but wonder just how all that reaching out to his Muslim brothers has worked out for him

On the one hand, Hoenlein says, “His reference to Israel and the special relationship being unbreakable is important, and references to persecution and Holocaust denial were important, and some of his references to some human rights issues also were important.” But Hoenlein notes the speech included a number of troubling references and comparisons. He cites the fact that Obama claimed America has seven million Muslims. That is a figure “Arab propagandists have put out,” he says. “In fact, they say only six million, when in fact there’s no study that shows even half of that.”

In 2007, the Pew Research Center estimated the Muslim American population at 2.35 million. The Question is, does Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah know something we don’t? Moreover just how did the Pew Research Center estimate the Muslim Population in America? Did they round up all the Muslims terrorists in the Country and have them sound off one by one??? Don’t forget Muslims lie and deceive. Well… maybe Pew is deceived…what’s more important maybe Obama isn’t.

Hoenlein is disturbed that Obama did not mention the Jewish people’s ancient historical connection with the land of Israel. “There was no reference” he said “to the 3,000 years of Jewish connection to this land, And that is again one of the propaganda lies that the Muslims have used: that the Jews are interlopers, that the two physically obvious temples never existed, that there was never any Jewish history in the land of Israel. Even Yasser Arafat and others have used that argument because they’re trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state. I don’t believe that was the president’s intent, but not making those references I think is troubling.” This is beyond troubling Mr. Hoenlein, this is deception. Obammah certainly knows his history; he is banking on the fact that you and the rest of us don’t.

A little history
Jews have claimed a connection to the land of their forefathers since 1400 B.C. more than 2000 years before Islam even existed. Even after the Roman destruction of the Second Temple in 70 A.D. and the dispersal of Jews throughout the Roman Empire, many Jews continued to reside in Jerusalem through the centuries, surviving various invasions. An Ottoman census of Jerusalem conducted in 1845 showed Jews outnumbered Muslim Arabs by almost to 2 to 1 and were the dominant ethnic group in the region. Moreover there never was any Palestine.

Hoenlein believes that the most troubling aspect of Obama’s comments in his Cairo speech was his effort to equate the Nazi killing of more than six million Jews during the Holocaust --- with Israel’s struggle with the Palestinians over six decades and the suffering caused by the displacement of the so-called Palestinians.

“There’s no comparison between the Holocaust, even if it was an indirect one, --- and what happened to Palestinians,” Hoenlein declares. This is where Hoenlien is wrong, really wrong. As he said previously, it doesn’t matter what is said, it matters what is in the mind of Islam. And in Al-Barrack Hussein Obama’s mind and in the mind of Islam what the Israelis are doing to the terrorist Hamas that has squatted on land belonging to Israel is tantamount to what the Nazis did to the Jews. Maybe Hoenlein just needs to open his eyes, ‘a little wider’.

What Hoenlein and the rest of the west doesn’t understand and Obama does, is that the Nazis where just a European modification of the Islamic agenda. Moreover this is a deceptive twisted spin of the connection between Nazism and Islam, in that the Nazis were doing to the Jews what Islam is trying to do, and that is, complete genocide of the Jewish Nation. Notice in his speech, President Obama addressed the issue of the Holocaust head-on, saying “Six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. But he quickly changed the subject, comparing Hitler’s Struggle (Mien Kampf) genocide of the Jews, to the fabricated struggle of the Jews to deny the existence of the ‘Muslim Terrorists’ who deceptively call themselves Palestinians.

One must understand what Obama understands and that is “Mein Kampf” means “My Struggle” and interestingly “Jihad” means “MY STRUGGLE” as well. This is not a coincidence my friend, Nazism was Hitler doing what Muhammad couldn’t achieve. Now Islam is doing what Nazism couldn’t achieve. It is not as Obama is ridiculously portraying and that is that Judaism and Nazism are related. Only a Muslim could twist the truth that out of shape.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I know, I know it is like grasping at cob webs trying to hold on to the cliff we are falling off of. But maybe, just maybe, this will at least lead to the portal of illumination for the Jews. Moreover if the Jews wake up, maybe Israel will as well.

What of the rest of the west?

Well that’s another question isn’t it???

One for which I don’t have an answer.

Not yet anyway…

de Andréa

Saturday, June 13, 2009

No Longer a Christian Nation

On April 6, 2009, Obama declared to the Nation of Islam that America was no longer A Christian Nation.

By de Andréa

Watch a video of Rep. Randy Forbes speaking before congress about this Statement made by President Obama.

This Statement, “…we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation…” was made in turkey by Obama as ‘President of the United States of America’ at an Islamic Summit in April if this year.

As you listen to the words spoken by Mr. Forbes you will notice that one of the questions he asks, is the question “What was that moment that we ceased to be so?” [Meaning a Christian nation] While he uses the whole speech to answer the first question which was “Whether or not we ever considered ourselves a Judeo-Christian nation”, he gives examples of when it wasn’t the time when we lost our Christian Heritage, but he never answered the question “What was that moment that we ceased to be so?”

Well… risking my life and the life and safety of my family, I will answer that question: It was when Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah became President of these United States and said, “…we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation”…Moreover, we became an Islamic nation when he said, “America is one of the largest Muslim Nations in the world”. And if that isn’t enough, he bowed down ‘in submission’ to the King of Islam King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz the King of the Wahhabist terrorist State of Saudi Arabia. That my friend, is when we lost our Christian Heritage as well as our freedom and handed it to the enemy of this world.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Representative Randy Forbes it trying to get it back, by introducing the ‘Spiritual Heritage Resolution’, dubbed as the ‘The Forbes Resolution’.

Watch for it…

de Andréa

Friday, June 12, 2009

The Good Guys Are Now The Bad Guys

And worse than that, the bad guys are now the new good guys.

By de Andréa

If a mother sees her child being molested and she slaps the assailant with her purse, she is now a hate criminal because this is now a protected class of perverts . There are other protected classes in here. I mean simple exhibitionism. I have female friends who have told me over the years that some guy flashed them, and their immediate reaction was to hit them with their purse or throw something heavy at them. Well now, he's committed a misdemeanor, [and] she has committed a federal hate crime because the exhibitionism is protected under the sexual orientation clause... Rep. Gohmert is correct: IT IS SO WRONG!

Originally introduced as SB-909 and dubbed as the “pedophile protection bill” now, Senate Democratic leaders are pushing the federal "hate crimes" bill to the floor of the Senate secretly on the back of another unrelated bill... and send it to Barack Obama to be signed into law! They have said that they won't even be allowing ANY hearings or amendments to this outrageous perverted legislation

Why would they do things this way? Why would they prevent any discussion of this bill in a committee hearing? Why would they not simply bring up their "hate crimes" bill as a standalone bill?

Because of YOU, and thousands more like you across the country! Thanks to all of our efforts, Senate Democrats are scared to death to allow the communist hate bill to be opened to public scrutiny and Republican attack as the "Pedophile Protection Act" that it is.

The sexually perverted radical liberal "leaders" in the U.S. Senate are ready to propose their "hate crimes" bill as an amendment QUICKLY, as soon as they decide what "must-pass" legislation they want to attach it to. That could happen ANY TIME now, with passage of this new bill within a week -- which means we have to FIGHT HARD NOW TO STOP IT!


Different strokes for different folks:
Whatever happened to "equal justice for all"? As Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) stated, "Under this bill, justice will no longer be equal. Justice will now depend on the race, gender, sexual orientation, disability or other protected status of the victim. It will allow different penalties to be imposed for the same crime. This is the real injustice."

We all know that every year, many violent crimes are committed out of hate. But just as many violent crimes, if not more, are motivated by something other than hate - whether it's greed, jealously, desperation, or revenge, to name a few. A person's motivation for committing a violent crime is usually complex, and often we can only guess as to why he or she did it.

What difference does it make, every violent crime is deplorable -- regardless of its motivation. Every violent crime can be devastating not only to the victim and their family, but also to the larger community whose sense of safety has been violated. That's why ALL violent crimes must be vigorously prosecuted.

But this bill goes MUCH, MUCH FARTHER than simply prosecuting violent crime -- it creates a new "protected class" of people that would now be protected under "hate crimes" definitions. That means that this bill will protect all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or "Paraphilias" listed by the American Psychiatric Association! This would provide a HUGE MASS of "sacred cows" in our society, which includes pedophiles who would be given elevated protection -- giving "the offender" an additional decade behind bars.

Moreover, just try to protect yourself or your loved one from an attack by one of these sexual perverts and you could find yourself in jail. Women could no longer fight off a rapist because they would be charged with a hate crime of assault on a protected group of sexual deviants.

And the "offender" could be YOU! If a pedophile tries to molest your daughter, or your nephew, or your granddaughter, or some little boy in the street -- if you step in and beat the pedophile to get him away, YOU could spend ten years in prison for your "offense"!

I am NOT exaggerating, this is law. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), who supports this horrendous bill, admitted that the bill would protect all 547 forms of sexual deviancy listed by the APA.

Here's what Hastings said on the floor of the U.S. House itself:
“This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these "Philias" and fetishes and "isms" that were put forward need not live in fear because of who and what they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”

Apparently, supporters of this bill have no problem with sexual deviants, including pedophiles, getting a higher level of protection against you and me!

The far-left sexual perverts such as Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced their version of bill into the Senate... and since they know this immoral perversion of the law can't pass as a "stand-alone" bill, they're going to try to get a vote on it as a hidden amendment to another bill without even going through a committee hearing!

In George Orwell's classic book, "1984," the State was constantly cracking down on what they called "thought crimes" -- that is, you didn't face prosecution just because of what you DID -- but also because of what you THOUGHT.

That is EXACTLY what this "hate crime" bill will do -- it blurs the lines between violent belief, which is constitutionally protected, and violent action, which is not. If we go down this road, where does it end? With speech monitors and thought police?

As Janet Porter of Faith2Action noted, "Pushing away an unwelcome advance of a homosexual, transgendered, cross-dresser or exhibitionist could make you a felon under this new law. Speaking out against the homosexual agenda could also make you a felon if you are said to influence someone who pushes away or otherwise defends themselves against an unwelcome advance. And pedophiles and other sexual deviants would enjoy an elevated level of protection while children, seniors, veterans, and churches would not."

Rep. Gohmert warned that this law would be used against pastors -- or anyone else -- who speaks against homosexuality or other alternative sexual lifestyle choices, saying that it provides that anyone who through speech "induces" commission of a violent hate crime "will be tried as a principal" alongside the active offender.

Critics say it would allow for prosecutions against pastors who preach a biblical ban on homosexuality if someone who hears such a message later is accused of any crime. A pastor's sermon could be considered "hate speech" under this legislation if it's heard by someone who then commits an act of violence against someone based on "sexual orientation.” The pastor could be prosecuted for "conspiracy to commit a hate crime.”

Don't think this could happen? Well it already has…
Some while back I wrote about similar state laws that have resulted in persecution for Christians. I wrote about an incident in Philadelphia that occurred a few years ago, it was about a 73-year-old grandmother that was jailed for trying to share Christian tracts with people at a homosexual festival. And Canada, which already has severely restrictive "hate crime" laws, government "Human Rights Commissions" review any "suspect" speech or actions that might be perceived as being against any of their "protected classes."

So today, Canada has a major national magazine, a federal political party leader and a registered political party, a major Catholic newspaper (Catholic Insight) and an internationally renowned journalist (Mark Steyn) -- all of whom are being investigated by appointed "hate speech therapists" from the commissions. Even Focus on the Family, one of the largest Christian publishing and broadcasting organizations in America, has admitted that it has been reviewing, and if necessary editing, its broadcasts to avoid complications with Canadian "hate crimes" laws.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Under this new law, I could be brought up on charges, prosecuted, and jailed for just writing or thinking about this subject.

I say bring it on, I will not be stopped, muzzled, edited, or censored.

Moreover if I am arrested and jailed, I hope they have enough duck tape to shut my mouth.


Contact you State Senators and your local Representative. Let them know what you know about the moral decay of our congress and this administration.

You can use the sample letter at the end of this article:

Tell them to vote against SB-909 or watch for it as attachment to an unrelated bill or you will get out the vote against them no matter what office they run for.

We the people: in order to form a more perfect union….

Is it going to be “We the people” or “They, the corrupt perverted dictators”? You decide…

de Andréa

The Honorable ___________
[Room #] if available
Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator: [name]

I am writing to urge you to do all in your power to oppose passage of S. 909, also known as "The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act."

Passage of this bill by the U.S. Senate would be reckless and irresponsible not only because of the "chilling effect" it would have on First Amendment-guaranteed rights to free speech, but also because it would provide, for the first time ever, special legal protections for pedophiles and other sexual offenders.

This bill would more appropriately be called "The Pedophile Protection Act."

The evidence for this extraordinary statement comes directly from debate in the House, when a simple amendment to exempt pedophiles from the protections offered by the bill were rejected.
I write to warn you that those who support it, or allow it to become the law of the land without a fight, will be held accountable at election time.

If there was ever a time for the Senate to stand and fight with a filibuster, that time is now. We are calling for members of the Senate, Republicans and Democrats alike, to stop S. 909.

Stop "The Pedophile Protection Act" dead in its tracks – now.

Please respond to me in writing as to whether you intend to oppose this dangerous bill – including by filibuster if necessary.

Your name
Your address

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Obama Breeds Climate of Hate Against Jews and Christians

Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz is a member of the Reform movement of Judaism and serves as a chaplain for the State of New York. A former U.S. Navy and Marine Corps officer and chaplain, he has also served as deputy national chaplain for the Jewish War Veterans of the United States.

As you read this letter from someone connecting the dots about President Obama’s actions and speech, watch for the confusion in Rabbi’s Pomerantz writing, as to why Obama is doing this? Seemingly looking for a reason for Obama’s ignorance of history etc. I can give the only answer that fits all the questions. Just as Hitler was a Nazi, Obama is a Muslim sleeper terrorist. Think about it as you read this cry for understanding.

de Andréa
June 11, 2009

The following:
By Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz

Our new president did not tell a virulent anti-Semite to travel to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington to kill Jews, but he is most certainly creating a climate of hate against us.

It is no coincidence that we are witnessing this level of hatred toward Jews as President Barack Obama positions America against the Jewish state.

Just days ago Obama traveled to Cairo, Egypt. It was his second trip in a short time to visit Muslim countries. He sent a clear message by not visiting Israel.

But this was code
In Cairo, Obama said things that pose a grave danger to Jews in Israel, in America and everywhere.

And if his views are not vigorously opposed they will help create a danger as great as that posed by the Nazis to the Jewish people.
Just last week, Obama told his worldwide audience — more than 100 million people — that the killing of six million Jews during the Holocaust was the equivalent of Israel’s actions in dealing with the Palestinians.

This remark is incredible on its face, an insult to the six million Jews who died as a result of Hitler’s genocide — and it is a form of revisionism that will bode evil for Jews for years to come.

While Obama acknowledged that “six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today” — his discussion about the Holocaust was followed by this statement: “On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people — Muslims and Christians — have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.”

“On the other hand . . . ”?

Obama’s clever construct comparing the mass genocide of six million Jews to the Palestinian struggle will not be lost on the estimated 100 million Muslims who tuned into to hear him.

Perhaps it was not lost on James W. von Brunn, the 88-year-old white supremacist identified as the alleged attacker Wednesday at the Holocaust Museum. He apparently felt that he could easily take retribution against the Jews for the atrocities Obama implies they are guilty of.

At first blush Mr. Obama’s speech seemed rosy, optimistic — one that espoused tolerance and understanding.

If you scratch the surface it is a dangerous document that history will view as a turning point for America and Israel — one that will lead to dangerous times ahead for both Jews and believing Christians.

The immediate danger posed by Obama’s speech is in its incredible re-writing of the history of Jews, Christians and Muslims from Medieval times to the present.

Obama, continually throughout his speech, talks of Islam’s peaceful intent. And while there are certainly Koranic verses that support this interpretation, Islam has a long and bloody history of violence against fellow Muslims, Jews and Christians.

Has Obama not heard about the Muslim’s violent conquest of the Middle East, Spain and half of Western Europe? Was he never taught that the Crusades sought to turn back this Muslim onslaught that demanded subjugated populations convert or die?

In his almost hour-long speech, there is not a single word about Islam’s well known and checkered past.

Ironically, the American president offered plenty of references to what he sees are America’s evils, such as its “colonialism” and history of slavery.

“For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation,” Obama told his audience, citing a litany of American shortcomings. He failed to mention that Arab Muslims were the greatest slave traders in the history of humanity.

According to Obama, Israelis, too, are guilty of wrongdoing, especially when it comes to their supposed maltreatment of the Palestinians.

Isn’t it odd an American president would go to a foreign country and slander his own country and its long-time ally?

At the same time he praises — unconditionally — a religion and culture that has a long history of being antithetical to the very values that have made America a great nation?

Mr. Obama even has the unbelievable gall, when talking about the treatment of Muslim women, to condemn Western countries for attempting to stop Muslim women from using the full facial cover, or hijab. This is a symbol of Muslim subjugation of women.

Listen to what Obama said: “Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit - for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.”

And Obama not only ignores the gross subjugation of women in many Arab societies — he does not mention even once the almost total religious intolerance throughout the Muslim world against Christians and Jews.

In his speech, Obama’s only plea for Muslim women living in Muslim countries is that they should be afforded an education.

How about a discussion of the beheading of Arab women for “crimes” such as adultery? How about the malicious treatment of women in Muslim countries who choose not to wear the hijaab?

Obama insists that Islam has promoted tolerance and that in Islamic societies such ideals have flourished.

Obama claimed that “as a student of history” he understands more than most the truth about “civilization's debt to Islam.”

He added, “And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”

Does he not know that a Jew or Christian would be beheaded in Saudi Arabia for practicing their religion today, now, this minute?

Of course, Obama offers not one example of where religious freedom is truly tolerated in the Muslim world. Yet, he proudly told his audience that in every state of the union and throughout the U.S. there exist more than 1,200 mosques.

But why, Mr. President, is there no Christian Church or Jewish synagogue operating within the borders of Saudi Arabia? Not even one.

Why in many countries, including your host Egypt, Christian churches have suffered vicious and continual persecution? Why is a once vibrant Cairo Jewish community — a home for the likes of Maimonides — today practically extinct?

Why, dear president, has the ancient Christian community in the West Bank and places like Bethlehem been almost completely wiped out by the modern Muslim onslaught?
“On the other hand,” to quote you Mr. President, you avoided mentioning some other truths.

Let’s start with the Israeli Arabs who can claim one of the highest standards of living in the Arab world. Indeed, they have more rights than Arabs in any Muslim country, their religious freedom is completely protected, and they even vote in free elections.

Tell me what Muslim country matches Israel’s record in protecting its minorities?
Even Arabs in the West Bank, during the time of Israeli control, saw their standard of living rise dramatically. Today, Arabs there are among the best educated in the world, thanks to Israel.

In your revisionist view, Israel has acted to harm these people. But it was not Israel that could not abide by United Nations resolutions clearly setting borders for both the state of Israel and an entity that had never existed before named Palestine.

You cleverly omitted any discussion of these facts, or the continual attacks against the state of Israel over six decades by its Muslim neighbors. Nor is it the Israelis who persecute from time to time the Coptic Christians of Egypt.

No, Mr. President, I do not accept your assertion that you are seeking religious tolerance or that you are seeking to protect Jews. I do not accept it because you are inventing a false history to fit your own agenda.

Mr. President, I am deeply disturbed that you would offer such a distortion of truth in the hopes of creating a lasting peace. A lasting peace cannot be created out of lies, distortions and half truths.

You profess to be a Christian. But you seem more intent on protecting Muslims. In your speech you talked openly of your Muslim heritage, your admiration of their way of life, and so forth. You said in your speech that you have made one of your chief aims of your presidency repairing the image of Islam.

Why did you hide these views from the American public during the recent presidential campaign?

Why, as president, did you fully bow to the Saudi king, who refuses to allow any religious freedom for any Christian or Jew?

You have made clear, by your words and assertions, that you are re-positioning the United States away from Israel, America’s lone democratic ally in the Mid-East.

You have made clear through your statements and those of your minions that Israel should, under no circumstances, prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

And yes, you have promised to retaliate against Iran if it ever attacks Israel with nuclear weapons.

But you know full well that if Iran succeeds in its admitted goal of “wiping the Jewish state off the map” — and hits this tiny nation with nuclear warheads — there will be no Israel for the U.S. to retaliate on behalf of
Some Jews may be naïve, but we are not stupid.

Some Christians are deceived as well Rabbi but they are not stupid either.
Thanks you sir for your keen observations.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Because the Rabbi is obviously not deceived by Obama’s rhetoric, I can only guess that he also knows that Obama is a Muslim bent on the destruction of America and the Judeao-Christian Western culture. His position may prevent him from directly saying so and hopes someone like myself who has nothing to loose but his life will express the obvious.

I hope you also; have the foresight, intuition or just the plain ability to see what is right in front of your nose. And shake off the shroud of deception that surrounds this man that has miraculously ascended from nowhere to the most powerful position in the world.

This is a very dangerous man to children and other living things.

de Andréa

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Women And Islmic Sharia Law

Unless we…that’s you and me, stop and reverse Sharia in America this is just one of the ideological aspects of the so-called “Peaceful Nation of Islam” that is coming to a neighborhood near you.

By de Andréa
June 10, 2009

In the very near future ‘Islamic Sharia Law’ will become more and more integrated into the system of American culture as it has in Europe. One only needs to take a short look at what has transpired in Great Brittan to see what is coming to America. Act for America will soon begin the launch of their 2009 “Stop Shariah Now” campaign. This will be an integrated grassroots, lobbying and public relations effort designed to raise public awareness and push for public policies that expose Shariah law and its infiltration into the United States.

Shariah Islamic law has already infiltrated America through vehicles such as Shariah compliant finance products offered by major financial institutions, including UBS, AIG, Citibank and HSBC. It has been reported that members of the Muslim Students Association in southern California have been seen chanting their demands for Shariah law during public demonstrations. We have also seen reports that estimate between 50,000 and 100,000 Muslims in America are practicing polygamy, a practice allowed under Shariah law.

Recently, a report surfaced on the internet that Lisa Ashton, a flight attendant with British Midland Airways, was fired for refusing to wear a traditional Islamic robe and walk behind male colleagues while in public in Saudi Arabia. This is the consequence of Shariah law in a society and a Western nation’s effort to bend over backwards with multicultural political correctness to accommodate it.

The next time you hear someone claim that Islam affords equal rights and protections to women, pull out the “Top 10” list below. You might also want to add one of the hadith (sayings and traditions of Mohammed), Mohammed claimed he was given a look into hell and saw that it was filled mostly with women because they were ungrateful to their husbands (Sahih Bukhari 2,18,61).

Top 10 Quran quotes every woman MUST SEE:
Tell every woman you know about these verses. The oppression of women that Islam advocates is not only disturbing, but is direct contrast with everything that Western civilization stands for when it comes to the rights of women.

These are referenced from an article published from the American Thinker in 2005. Each one goes into much greater detail if you are interested in reading more on each verse. The article is here: Top 10 rules in the Quran that oppress women

10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.
The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004)

9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.
The Quran in Sura 2:228 says: Wives have the same rights as the husbands have on them in accordance with the generally known principles. Of course, men are a degree above them in status . . . (Sayyid Abul A’La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an, vol. 1, p. 165)

8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.
The Quran in Sura 4:11 says: The share of the male shall be twice that of a female . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 311)

7. A woman’s testimony counts half of a man’s testimony.
The Quran in Sura 2:282 says: And let two men from among you bear witness to all such documents [contracts of loans without interest]. But if two men be not available, there should be one man and two women to bear witness so that if one of the women forgets (anything), the other may remind her. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 205).

6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man and then this second man divorces her.
The Quran in Sura 2:230 says: And if the husband divorces his wife (for the third time), she shall not remain his lawful wife after this (absolute) divorce, unless she marries another husband and the second husband divorces her. [In that case] there is no harm if they [the first couple] remarry . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 165)

5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.
(This could be your daughter, wife, or mother)
The Quran in Sura 4:24 says: And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people, except those who have fallen in your hands [as prisoners of war] . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319).

4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.
The Quran in Sura 4:3 says: And if you be apprehensive that you will not be able to do justice to the orphans, you may marry two or three or four women whom you choose. But if you apprehend that you might not be able to do justice to them, then marry only one wife, or marry those who have fallen in your possession. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 305)

3. A husband may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.
The Quran in Sura 4:129 says: It is not within your power to be perfectly equitable in your treatment with all your wives, even if you wish to be so; therefore, [in order to satisfy the dictates of Divine Law] do not lean towards one wife so as to leave the other in a state of suspense. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 381)

2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded).
The Quran in Sura 4:34 says: 4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (Haleem, emphasis added)

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.
The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says: 65:1 O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617, emphasis added)

THE BOTTOM LINE: I can’t help wonder what women’s lib would do with this if they just knew the truth. But of course virtually no one in the west knows much of anything about Islamic Sharia Law. The unfortunate part of that is by the time people become aware of Sharia, it will already be too late to stop it.

As the saying goes: “It is not a matter of ‘if’, but a matter of ‘when’”. So when is the Terror of Islamic Sharia Law coming to the United States of America? Let me tell you a profoundly big secret, where there is one Muslim there is Sharia Law. At present and according the President of these United States, “America is one of the largest Islamic Nations in the world.”

Couple that statement with another made by our Muslim President: “America is no longer a Christian Nation” and one has a culture that is ready to except Islam as their culture, their society, their religion, their government, their entire way of life.

So you see it is not a question of ‘if’ or even ‘when’ because Islamic Sharia Law has been in America for decades. Now, it is just a matter of time until Sharia totally and completely envelopes our own culture and way of life.

This is a common mistake made by the west. We believe that cultures can integrate, assimilate, and come together into one stew pot. ‘This is what America is’ after all. With all other cultures in the world this can be true; America is a prime example of that. But the Nation of Islam is unlike any other culture on the planet. It is contrary to any other religion, ideology, or philosophy. It does not assimilate it proliferates.

I understand that no one wants to hear the truth, but I am going to say it anyway. Islam will never become Christian. Christians will become Muslims or Slaves of Islam or the third option is always of course… Death

Can we stop this from happening, yes! But the big question is ‘will we’


I hope for all our sakes that I am wrong…

Join Act for America now and help stop Sharia in America.

de Andréa

Thursday, June 04, 2009

America’s Muslim President Speaks

“The number of Muslims in the U.S. would make America one of the largest Muslim countries in the world," claimed President Obama in an interview released this week.

By de Andréa

His assertion, which is factually inaccurate on a percentage of population bases, comes a day before he is set to deliver a much-anticipated address to the Muslim world from his unholy land of Saudi Arabia, and of course, Cairo Egypt.

Al-Obammah says "Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslims Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. And so there's got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples." This from a man that thinks there are 52 States.

In all fairness to Obama however, I may be one of the few who knows what he meant. Even though there are only approximately 8 million Muslims in the U.S. or a little less that 3 percent of the population, (and growing faster than any other religious group I might add) putting America about 50th in percentage of Muslim population, 8 million is in fact one of the largest Muslim populations of any country in the world. For example the State of Michigan alone has a population of Muslims greater than the entire country of Afghanistan.

Another one of his confusing statements is that “America is no longer a Christian Nation, America is an Islamic Nation”.

Moreover don’t forget the Statement he let slip, that he is “proud of his Muslim Faith”

From this vantage point, two events this week appear to be ominous straws in the wind, warnings of a "man-caused" maelstrom that may inexorably plunge the Middle East into another, potentially cataclysmic war.

The first is the fact that Israel feels obliged to undertake an unprecedented, country-wide civil defense exercise this week. At one point in its course, every man, woman and child in the Jewish State is supposed to seek shelter from a simulated attack of the kind Iran may shortly be able to execute against it.

The second is President Obama's latest effort to reach out to the Muslim world, this time on June 4 from one of its most important capitals, Cairo. There, he is expected to make an address that will reiterate his previous statements on the subject - pronouncements that, unfortunately, can only have been interpreted by his intended audience as acts of submission.

Be prepared for an abandonment of Israel
If past is prelude, the President of the United States will: apologize yet again for purported offenses against Muslims by his country; he will promise to be respectful of Islam, including those who adhere to its authoritative, if virulent, theo-political-legal program known as Shariah; and enunciate diplomatic priorities and initiatives designed to reach out to America's enemies in the region, while putting excruciating pressure on its most reliable ally there, Israel.

This pressure has become more palpable by the day. It has taken various forms, including: U.S. stances adopted at the United Nations that will serve to isolate Israel; blank political and even financial checks for Palestinian thugs like Mahmoud Abbas; diminishing U.S.-Israeli cooperation on intelligence and military matters; and the withholding from Israel of helicopters (and perhaps other weaponry) being provided to Islamic terrorist states.

Perhaps the most chilling example of this coercive pressure so far, however, was originally reported in the Israeli paper Yediot Aharonot and given international prominence by my contact at the Jerusalem Post columnist and editor, Caroline Glick listen to a speech by Caroline Glick. According to these accounts, in a recent lecture in Washington, U.S. Army Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, the American officer charged with training Palestinian military forces in Jordan, made a shocking declaration.

In Carol Glick's words,
"[Gen. Dayton] indicated that if Israel does not surrender Judea and Samaria within two years, the Palestinian forces he and his fellow American officers are now training at a cost of more than $300 million could begin killing Israelis.” She went on to note that neither the general nor the Obama administration seemed to find this prospect grounds for rethinking the wisdom of such a training-and-arming program. In fact, her column observed that Defense Secretary Robert Gates "just extended Dayton's tour of duty for an additional two years and gave him the added responsibility of serving as Obama's Middle East mediator George Mitchell's deputy."

Taken together with the U.S. administration's refusal to come to grips with what truly is the most serious threat to peace in the Middle East - Iran's rising power and growing aggressiveness, reflecting in part its incipient nuclear weapons capabilities - the stage is being inexorably set for the next, and perhaps most devastating, world conflict. Maybe what the Bible refers to as Armageddon.

Whether the signals Mr. Obama is sending are intended to communicate such a message or not, they are going to be read by Israel's enemies as evidence of a profound rift between the United States and the Jewish State. In this part of the world, that amounts to an invitation to an open season on Israel.

It is hard to believe that the Obama Middle East agenda enjoys the support of the American people or their elected representatives in Congress. Historically, the public and strong bipartisan majorities on Capitol Hill have appreciated that an Israel that shares our values, that is governed democratically and that is in the cross-hairs of the same people who seek our destruction is an important ally. Quite apart from a sense of moral and religious affinity for the Jewish people's struggle to survive in their ancient homeland, most of us recognize that it is in the United States' strategic interest to stand with Israel.

It is understandable that a Muslim like Mr. Obama does not appear to share this appreciation. Because as he says America is not only a Muslim Nation it is one of the largest Muslim Nations on the planet. Better get your prayer rug and get used to it. To those who are worried about his affinity and submission to the Saudi king and Islam, and more generally his longstanding ties to virulent critics of Israel like Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi and former Harvard professor-turned-National Security Council staffer Samantha Power, the President's attitude is not exactly a surprise. It is supported by the friends he makes.

THE BOTTOM LINE: As the implications of President Obama's Mideast policies - for the United States as well as Israel - become clearer, that he is nothing but a Muslim terrorist, he will hopefully find himself facing the sort of popular and congressional revolt that has confronted him in recent weeks on Guantanamo Bay where he wants to release his terrorist friends into the American/Islamic culture. The question is: Will such a reaffirmation of American solidarity with and support for Israel come in time to prevent the winds of war being whipped up by Mr. Obama's Muslim posturing and rhetoric - and driving Israelis into bomb shelters - from wreaking havoc in the Middle East, and perhaps far beyond?

We may want to re-evaluate: Just who the enemy of freedom really is…

de Andréa

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Obammah Continues to Bow to His King

It wasn’t a mistake in protocol, oh no, it was an exhibition of submission to Islam.

By de Andréa
June 3, 2009

So you still don’t think that Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah is a Muslim sleeper terrorist that has awaken and will deliver Israel and America into the Hands of the World Nation of Islam???

Then lookie what we have here:
Obama, who said we are no longer a Christian Nation because we are now a Muslim Nation, has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Saudi Arabia and four of its princes from being held accountable for their role in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States that killed 3,000 Americans. I certainly new this was coming.

As Obammah plans his trip to his unholy land of Saudi Arabia --- and via the solicitor general, Elena Kagan, the Obama administration has asked that the Saudis be held immune under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, (FSIA) even though there is ample evidence of involvement by the Saudi government and the named princes in support of the al-Qaeda attack.

As president of the United States, Obama has just offered your support to Islam for the unprovoked 9/11 attack on the sovereign country of America.

While the FSIA generally protects a sovereign state, there are exceptions under which its provisions can be invoked. Such interpretations are left largely to the courts to determine.

Saudi Arabia is the Capital of Sunni Wahhabist Islam; it is the birth place of Muhammad and the perverted religion of Muslims and the throne of Allah the Dominic god of the world Nation of Hell. Moreover it is the home of Mecca the unholy city of Obammah, who believes as Louis Farrakhan said Al-Obammah is the resurrected twelfth Caliphate of Islam.

Families of the 9/11 victims, however, have rightly expressed outrage over the Obama administration's filing. They are correct that the action undermines the continuing fight against terror. It is too bad that they do not comprehend that this is exactly the point of the action.

In its recent friend-of-the-court brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in "Federal Insurance Co. vs. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," the Obama administration asked the court to deny a petition for a "writ of certiorari," (or a higher court hearing,) by the families of the victims of 9/11 in their effort to sue Saudi Arabia and its princes.

In the original case filed in 2006, the families of the 9/11 victims allege Saudi Arabia and four Saudi princes acting in their capacity as high-level government officials and as individuals made donations to “Islamic charitable organizations” with the knowledge that the so-called charities were of course giving the funds to al-Qaida. In response, the Saudi government invoked the FSIA as a basis to preclude a lawsuit by the 9/11 victims' families.

In August 2008, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the 2006 ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Casey in dismissing the claim against Saudi Arabia. The dismissal covered the four princes, a Saudi banker, and a Saudi charity. In addition, the appeals court said that the exceptions to immunity didn't apply since the State Department had not designated Saudi Arabia as a state sponsor of terrorism.

There appears, however, to be a possible conflict in what the FSIA allows and a portion of a U.S. statute [28USC1605(a)] which states, in effect, that a foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts if the attack and funding for it occurred in the U.S.

"Although the United States disagrees in certain respects with the analysis of the court of appeals, further review by this Court to determine the best legal basis for that immunity is unwarranted," Kagan wrote.

Fifteen of the 19 terrorists who hijacked U.S. aircraft and crashed them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon on 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia and were affiliated with al-Qaida. Intelligence and past actions link the Saudi government and the four princes with al-Qaida.

"In effect, Obama announced its opposition to allowing 9/11 victims and their families full access to the U.S. legal system in (the government's) effort to protect Saudi Arabia and its princes from being held accountable for their role in the attack on the United States," said Peter Leitner, who has assisted terror victims' families successfully in suing terrorist organizations for the past 12 years.

"As power of Attorney for the family and estate of John P. O'Neill, former FBI (counter-terrorism) expert, I find it disgusting that the Obama administration has spat in the faces of these victims just as (Obama) prepares to leave for Egypt and Saudi Arabia while advocating for the closing of (the U.S. Guantanamo prison in Cuba) and giving full access to the U.S. court system to the terrorists currently imprisoned there," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Disgusting yes, surprising no. I predicted that AL- Barrack Hussein Obammah would do this and more as soon as he announced his candidacy for the First Black Muslim President of the United States of America.

Couple this with his abandonment of Israel, his encouragement of Iran to destroy Israel, his total submission to the King of Islam, his aid to terrorist Hamas in Gaza and on and on and on.

Just what does need to happen before America wakes up from their blind deaf and dumb slumber or drunken stupor or the politically correct drugs we are being fed by the Federal education system and the indoctrination of the Socialist communist media that exists in this country.

I predict that within the next 5 years, half of the nation will be so brainwashed and the other half minus a few like you and me, will be so lazy or scared to lift a finger to save what little they have left of their freedom. Moreover, America will be totally Islamic and under the control of Saudi Arabia and Sharia law.

And Obama will give it to them on a silver platter.

What do you think? Or maybe a better question would be to ask, are you are still among the independent thinkers, able to see the picture after connecting the dots…

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Kill Gitmo Detainees

While Cheney doesn’t actually advocate lining up all the terrorist detainees at Gitmo and machine gunning them down, he says it is the only alternative to keeping them incarcerated until at least the end of the war with Islam.

By de Andréa

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that the only alternative to holding suspected terrorists indefinitely would be to execute them, arguing against the Obama administration's plans to close the Guantanamo detainee prison and releasing the prisoners. "If you're going to be engaged in a world conflict such as we are, such as the global war on terrorism, if you don't have a place where you can hold these people, your only other option is to kill them," Mr. Cheney said. "And we don't operate that way."

The former vice president's statements only raise the stakes in fierce debate with his critics, who believe Mr. Cheney presided over the formulation of interrogation techniques that they regard as torture and remains unapologetic for approving water-boarding and other harsh methods used.

Mr. Cheney bases his argument on the view that suspected terrorists should be considered prisoners of war and as such, "ought to be held until the end of the conflict”.

He also criticized the Obama administration for failing to think through its plans to scuttle Guantanamo.

"Obama made a mistake, issuing an order that he wants it closed within a year, but didn't have a clue as to how to proceed," Mr. Cheney said. "And now they're having trouble because they have to come up with a plan of some kind."

The former vice president said that the Guantanamo Bay prison is "a fine facility" and that the White House will have a "very difficult" time closing it, because of the legal, political, and diplomatic challenges associated with indefinite detention.

Mr. Obama has indicated that even after the Guantanamo closure, the government will still have to hold some detainees in prolonged detention. Obama has also restarted the military commission’s process to try some detainees there, instead of in civilian courts, following the Bush policy.

In arguing for the continued use of Guantanamo, Mr. Cheney cited recent press reports that said the majority of the more than 500 prisoners released from Guantanamo have or will return in some capacity to what he called that jihad business.

Mr. Obama's decision to close Guantanamo, however, was of course praised by Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu during a visit to Washington.

But on the domestic political front, one of the leading contenders for the Republican nomination to run against Mr. Obama in 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney took aim at the president's foreign policy and defense budget cuts.

Mr. Romney characterized Mr. Obama's last two trips abroad as a tour of apology and criticized signs from the White House that they might back off a missile defense system in Eastern Europe. "Arrogant, delusional tyrants can't be stopped by earnest words and furrowed brows," Mr. Romney said. "Action, strong bold action coming from a position of strength and determination, is the only effective deterrent."

North Korea and Iran were two of the topics that Mr. Cheney admitted the Bush administration did fall short on. We didn't bat 1,000. No question about it. And Iran and North Korea are still out there, Mr. Cheney said in response to a question about the growth of nuclear programs in both regimes during the eight years that Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were in office. I wish we could have done more, but those are problems that are passed on to the next administration.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Reminiscent of General Pershing in the Philippines who understood the Muslim mind, lining them up, and gunning them down, is the only real deterrent to Islamic Jihad in the West.

The Sunni Wahhabist Muslim mind understands nothing except violence, whether it is violence against you, or violence against them. Benevolence is weakness and justice is blind, in the literal sense.

The Western mind is grossly deceived because of our benevolent fair-minded culture. This is what Western Europe struggled with between 800 and 1100 AD. For 300 years Western Europe mistakenly thought they could eventually redirect the Muslim culture to align with their own.

The U.S. has actually been at war with Islam for more than 200 years. Since 1783 our trade ships were pirated in the Mediterranean. The first American war with Islam was the Barbary War (1801–1805), also known as the Barbary Coast War or the war of Tripoli, it was the first war fought between the United States and the Nation of Islam

The Western Europeans had learned something in the three hundred years of Muslim infiltration that may take another 74 years for the modern Western culture to discover. And that is that Islam will never assimilate into another culture. You my friend will assimilate into theirs.

This is why the Crusades of 11th century are now considered so brutal against Islam. They understood something we don’t yet understand, the only way to stop a brutal nation bent on your total destruction is to destroy the brutal Nation. This is why fire fighters sometimes start a fire at the edge of town in order to stop an oncoming fire from consuming the town. We must fight brutality with brutality. It is truly the only thing Islam understands.

For 226 years Islam has been attacking America, and they will not stop, unless they are stopped.

The Nation of Islam is not compatible with any other culture on the planet. This is because they believe that they are the only culture on the planet. All others must be destroyed or absorbed into the Muslim culture.

Will it take the West another 74 years to recognize this?

V.P. Dick Cheney may not know how right he is: "If you're going to be engaged in a world conflict such as we are, such as the global war on terrorism, if you don't have a place where you can hold these people, your only other option is to kill them…"

The fact that --- “…we don't operate that way,” just may lead to our demise…

de Andréa