Thursday, July 31, 2008

S.F. Condemns the Catholic Church

The City of S.F. Condemns the Catholic Church

Instructs members to defy God, the cultural wars continue…

By de Andréa

A San Francisco city and county board resolution that officially labeled the Catholic Church's Biblical teachings on homosexuality as "insulting to all San Franciscans," "hateful," "defamatory," "insensitive" and "ignorant" is being challenged in court for violating the Constitution's prohibition of government hostility toward religion.

While this is an issue about the church verses homosexuality, if one just looks down the road a little, one can see that this could turn into an issue about religion verses the government.

Moreover, while one might be on the side of the First Amendment the freedom of speech and religion, but if these court proceedings escalate to bring about a strong ruling that government cannot in anyway interfere in religious practices no matter what, and no matter what religion; then one should be able to see as well that the theocracy of Islam which hides under the cloak of religion would stand once again to gain power by using our own freedom which they hate, as just another tool in their growing arsenal, to defeat us.

Keep this in mind while you read this article and remember that laws or rulings can have far reaching implications and can be applied to issues for which they were never intended. Remember religions are all the same under the law, because even though you and I may not be--justice is blind...

Resolution 168-08, passed unanimously by the largely homosexual City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors two years ago, also accused the Vatican of being a "foreign country" meddling with and attempting to "negatively influence (San Francisco's) existing and established customs,” which apparently includes the in your face Sacred San Francisco “custom” of homosexuality.

The resolution said of the church's teaching on homosexuality, "Such hateful and discriminatory rhetoric is both insulting and callous, and shows a level of insensitivity and ignorance which has seldom been encountered by this Board of Supervisors." Isn’t this what the controversy between the kettle and the black pot is about?

Resolution 168-08 was an official response to the Catholic Church's ban on child adoption placements into homosexual couple households, issued by Cardinal William Levada of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Vatican.

The board's resolution urged the city's local archbishop and the Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco to defy the Vatican’s instructions and Gods word, concluding with a spiteful reminder that the church authority that issued the ban was known 100 years ago as "The Holy Office of the Inquisition."

The resolution also took a shot at Levada, the former archbishop of San Francisco, saying, "Cardinal Levada is a decidedly unqualified representative of his former home city, and of the people of San Francisco and the values they hold dear,." or in this case, possibly the lack thereof.

The anti-Catholic diatribe had been challenged in U.S. District Court on similar grounds before, but District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel ruled in favor of the city, saying, in essence, the church started it. She wrote in her decision, "The Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith provoked this debate, indeed may have invited entanglement" for instructing Catholic politicians on how to vote. This court does not find that our case law requires political bodies to remain silent in the face of provocation." She ruled that the city's proclamation was not entangling the government in church affairs, since the resolution was a non-binding, non-regulatory announcement. Since no law was enacted, she ruled, city officials – even in their official capacity as representatives of the government – can say what they want.

"It is merely the exercise of free speech rights by duly elected office holders," she wrote.
Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, which is appealing the District Court decision on behalf of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and two Catholic residents of San Francisco, disagrees with Patel's decision.

"Sadly, the ruling itself clearly exhibited hostility toward the Catholic Church," he said in a statement. "The judge in her written decision held that the Church ‘provoked the debate' by publicly expressing its moral teaching, and that by passing the resolution the City responded 'responsibly' to all of the 'terrible' things the Church was saying."

Thomas More attorney Robert Muise will present oral arguments in the case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. “Our Constitution plainly forbids hostility toward any religion, including the Catholic faith," he said.

As a side note and as I said before, bear this in mind, if push comes to shove, this would include anything that resembles hostility toward the Islamic so-called “religion” as well, as they continue to impose their theocracy on our culture.

"In total disregard for the Constitution, homosexual activists in positions of authority in San Francisco have abused their authority as government officials and misused the instruments of the government to attack the Catholic Church. Their egregious abuse of power has now the backing of a lower federal court. Unfortunately, all too often we see a double standard being applied in Establishment Clause cases," Muise said.

Thomas More attorneys argued in the District Court case that the "anti-Catholic resolution sends a clear message" that Catholics are "outsiders, not full members of the political community."

The cultural, and now political, straight-arm to adherents of the Christian faith in San Francisco has been increasingly public in the last two years. The Thomas More Law Center hopes the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will decide in the case of Resolution 1680-08 that even if a large portion of the community is at odds with a religion's views on homosexuality, the government cannot be used as a weapon to condemn religious faith. This could be dangerous in the future.

Currently, Colorado and Michigan are tackling the question of whether the Bible itself can be vilified as "hate speech" for it's condemnation of homosexuality, and Canada has developed human rights commissions, which have decided people cannot express opposition to homosexuality without fear of government reprisal. What is very curious here is the fact that the Quran says Homosexuals are to be killed. And yet that is not classified as hat speech. “Double Standards” anyone???

THE BOTTOM LINE: While this is truly an attack on religious freedom, we must be careful when we make demands, because this decision or ruling by the courts becomes precedent that can later be used against our culture and our freedom in a similar conflict with Islam, a theocracy that calls itself a religion, which is bent on subjugating this Country and converting all Americans to Islam or be killed. The irony of this of course is that all homosexuals will be the first to be executed.

Sharia Law cares nothing about double standards. While government should not be allowed to control religion, we must be careful that religion is not able to control government either. Because as I previously stated, the law sees all religions as the same. Put another way, while we should not allow government to trample all over our rights of religion, we must as a religion be careful not to trample all over government.

Remember as one religion gains power in America, so do all, even Islam the religious and political enemy of this world…

de Andréa

Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Deception Continues

The following article appeared in the World Net Daily News. When you read this article, bear in mind that 3 out of 3 Muslims lie, many times deceiving you with the truth.

Even the most well intentioned information can be deceiving. My comments are at THE BOTTOM LINE.

de Andréa
July 27, 2008


1 in 3 Muslim students approve killing for Islam 'Stop talking about celebrating diversity and focus on integration and assimilation'

If ignorance and poverty are responsible for the growth of extremist views in the Islamic world, someone needs ask to Muslim students, privileged enough and bright enough to attend some of the United Kingdom's best universities, why one-in-three of them endorses killing in the name of Islam.

The report of this finding, based on a poll of 600 Muslim and 800 non-Muslim students at 12 universities in the UK, and conducted by YouGov on behalf of the Center for Social Cohesion, will be released tomorrow as "Islam on Campus."
Among its findings of Muslim beliefs:

40 per cent support introduction of sharia into British law for Muslims
One-third back the idea of a worldwide Islamic caliphate based on sharia law
40 per believe it is unacceptable for Muslim men and women to associate freely
24 per cent do not think men and women are equal in the eyes of Allah
25 percent have little or no respect for homosexuals.
53 per cent believe killing in the name of religion is never justified (compared with 94 per cent of non-Muslims), while 32 per cent say it is
57 percent believe Muslim soldiers serving in the UK military should be able to refuse duty in Muslim countries

More than half favor an Islamic political party to support their views in parliament
One-third don't think or don't know if Islam is compatible with Western views of democracy
"Significant numbers appear to hold beliefs which contravene democratic values," Hannah Stuart, one of the report's authors, told the London Times. "These results are deeply embarrassing for those who have said there is no extremism in British universities."
The report echoes one released last year by the Policy Exchange which found 37% of all Muslims aged 16-24 would prefer to live under a sharia system.

In addition to polling of 1,400 students, the researchers visited more than 20 universities to interview students and listen to guest speakers brought on campus. The report notes radical Islamic preachers regularly deliver inflammatory speeches that target homosexuals and border on anti-Semitism.

Our researchers found a ghettoized mentality among Muslim students at Queen Mary (college)," said James Brandon, deputy director at CSC. "Also, we found the segregation between Muslim men and women at events more visible at Queen Mary."

A spokesman for Queen Mary told the Times the university knew Islamic preachers had spoken on campus but was unaware of what they had said.

"Clearly, we in no way associate ourselves with these views. However, also integral to the spirit of university life is free speech and debate, and on occasion speakers will make statements that are deemed offensive," he said.

Wes Streeting, president of the National Union of Students, condemned the study: "This disgusting report is a reflection of the biases and prejudices of a right-wing think tank – not the views of Muslim students across Britain. Only 632 Muslim students were asked vague and misleading questions, and their answers were willfully misinterpreted."
The report was criticized by the country's largest Muslim student body, the Federation of Student Islamic Societies. Most of the Islamic societies on campuses operate under the FOSIS umbrella.

The authors of the report note that campus Islamic societies have, in the past, been where some UK terrorists became radicalized. They cite Kafeel Ahmed, who drove a jeep engulfed in flames into a building at the Glasgow airport last year and died of his burns. Investigators believe he adopted jihadist beliefs while studying at Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge.

In April, WND reported that the director-general of MI5 had warned the government that donations of hundreds of millions of pounds from Saudi Arabia and powerful Muslim organizations in Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Gulf Straits had led to a "dangerous increase in the spread of extremism in leading university campuses."

"The finding that a large number of students think it is okay to kill in the name of religion is alarming," said Anthony Glees, professor of security and intelligence studies at Buckingham University.

"There is a wide cultural divide between Muslim and non-Muslim students. The solution is to stop talking about celebrating diversity and focus on integration and assimilation."

THE BOTTOM LINE: The reason why I chose to formant this article in this manner is because I wanted you to see the deception in even a well intention bit of information. This is not to say that WND is wrong in reporting this information, but to show the ignorant umbrella of deception that we in the West live under.

First to clear up some confusion about a purely western concept of Islam and that is the concept of “Muslim Extremism” that the article concludes with. We in the “Western Culture” tend to think in terms of “Extreme” being something outside or over and above what is accepted as normal. In the case of Islam however what the West sees as extreme is in fact the normal over all philosophy of Islam. So Moderate or Extreme is one in the same. And yet we Westerners tend to separate the Muslims into two categories “Good and Bad”, acceptable and unacceptable. A terrorist being unacceptable, how about a Muslim who deceiving becomes your friend, is not a terrorists but secretly supports Islamic Jihad. He will appear to be a Moderate Muslim, one of the acceptable kinds. Is this a Moderate Muslim, or is this just a Muslim with a different job in the agenda of world subjugation in Islamic Jihad.

The article begins with the results of the study 1 in 3 Muslims approve killing for Islam. What about the other two Muslims? Do they not follow the path of their god Allah as he leads them to the ultimate goal of the subjugation of the whole world’s people under Sharia Law with Allah, as the King of this earth? No? Then, the other two are not Muslims. So this reduces the three, to 1 in 1, and if my math is correct that is 100 percent. One thing you can count on is that Muslims lie, sometimes cleverly deceiving with the truth. The doctrine incidentally, is found in the Quran (Allah’s plan) in Arabic it is called the doctrine of “Taqiyyah” (True lies).

Ignorance and poverty are of course not responsible for the growth of the Islamic world, as Muslims are among the wealthiest people in the planet. Poverty does not turn people to Islam, Muslims do.

The next mistake is the belief in social cohesion between East and West. The Western world for the most part is Free, based on the foundation of the Judeao Christian principle that “All men are created equal”. This is at the very root of freedom. Islam does not consider itself equal with anyone. No in fact Islam considers itself superior to everyone. All non Muslims are the Kaffaar, either equal with dogs or pigs. So… no equality, therefore no freedom, and subsequently no cohesion.

The article goes on to show a bunch of baseless percentages. Founded on the idea that Muslims actually think for themselves, and or they actually tell the truth. Even so, it shows a significant number of Muslims are willing to admit that they are terrorists and will kill you sooner or later. Not a comforting thought.

A Muslim without Sharia law is tantamount to a Christian without the teachings of Jesus Christ, or a Jew without the Law of Moses. Then there would not be any Muslims, Christians, or Jews.

The statement…"The finding that a large number of students think it is okay to kill in the name of religion is alarming," said Anthony Glees, professor of security and intelligence studies at Buckingham University. What if they were to discover that 100 percent of Muslims believed this? I would think that they would be more that a little alarmed.

And lastly…"There is a wide cultural divide between Muslim and non-Muslim students. The solution is to stop talking about celebrating diversity and focus on integration and assimilation.” This is the last of the ignorant statements made by someone that looks at Islam through Western eyes. The observation that there is a culture difference between Muslims and non Muslims called Infidels in the Quran and derogatorily referred to as the Kuffaar is not a very intellectually cognizant. While that statement is totally elementary the solution of Integration and assimilation is benighted.

In the year 1199 the people of Western Europe didn’t have the advantage of their own documented history as we have today. That being said, it took the Europeans of that circa, 300 years to finally understand that celebrating integration and assimilation was definitely not the solution, moreover it was instead, the problem.

No where in history or anywhere on the planet has Islam integrated or assimilated into anyone else’s culture. Instead Islam has always infiltrated the host country’s culture and then deceptively and incrementally introduced Islamic Sharia law until the culture was changed into Islam.

As they say, it is not a matter of if, but instead it is a matter of time…

de Andréa

Thursday, July 24, 2008

A letter from OPEC

An OPEC minister writes an open letter to American citizens

By de Andréa

The following is a bold open letter to the American people, written by an anonymous Minister of OPEC. It not only reveals the intention of OPEC, but the surreptitious hidden agenda of Islam as it relates to America and the free world.

Dear American Citizens,

”For over 1300 years we have been at war with the infidels of this world, and more than 200 years with you pigs in the U.S. especially since the embargo of the 1970's. You are so arrogant and ignorant that you haven't even recognized it. You have more missiles, bombs, and technology that we do; so we are fighting with the best weapon we have and extracting on a net basis more than 700 billion dollars a year out of your economy. We will destroy you! Death to freedom and the Kaffaar! Praise be to Allah!

I would like to thank you for not developing your 300 - 900 year supply of your own coal oil, oil fields, oil shale, and tar sands. We know if you did this, it would create energy independence, and millions of jobs for U.S. citizens, expand your engineering capabilities, and keep your wealth in the U.S. instead of sending it to us to finance our war against you pigs. And thanks for limiting your defense dept. purchases of oil sands from your neighbors to the north. We love it when you confuse your allies. Your oil will soon belong to us anyway, and then we will sell that to you as well. Because of the deception of Allah, may He soon rule the world; you Americans are just stupid deceived pigs. Allah, praise His name, makes it so easy for us.

'Thanks for letting us support your ignorant environmentalists with your petro-dollars to deceive you into over regulating every segment of your economy and thus delaying indefinitely, the development of your own oil fields and alternate fuel technologies and thus continue your dependence on Islam your greatest enemy. Praise be to Allah !.We are glad to see our lobbying efforts have been so effective. Corn based Ethanol. Praise be to Allah for this sham program! We will destroy you from the inside with the support of these types of policies. This is a gift from Allah, praise His name! We never would have thought of this one! This is better than when you pay your farmers NOT TO GROW FOOD. Have them use more energy to create less energy, and simultaneously drive food prices through the roof. Thank you U.S. Congress!!!! Allah’s Taqiyyah (the deception of Islam) is more powerful than your military and very far reaching.

And a very special thanks to your deceived citizens for letting us infiltrate your culture from elementary schools to the highest stations in your government. It makes Islamic Jihad much easier when you help.

And as to the captured document, the prize of the U.S. department of Justice, the document was the Brotherhood's 1991 long-term plan to subvert and collapse the United States and its political, economic, and other infrastructure, preparatory to achieving a forced Islamization of your country, and others, through a malign combination of immigration, intimidation, psychological warfare, and subterfuge. The Muslim Brotherhood proposed "settling" - colonizing - the U.S., infesting its infrastructure, and relying on societal openness, constitutional freedoms, and influence operations to proceed from there: "The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process',"

You are still too ignorant blind and deceived to understand that our work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by our hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah’s religion, Praise His name, is made victorious over all other religions."

Islamists are to be "infiltrating the adversaries and their fellow travelers and establishing a strong security apparatus" to support the underground movement, now, and the resulting theocratic Islamic state, later. "[We] are infiltrating the police forces, the armies, the different political parties, the newspapers, the Islamic groups, the petroleum companies ... private security companies, sensitive civil institutions, etc."

Despite this condemning evidence of our plan to overthrow the U.S. government and replacing your filthy constitution with Sharia, the perfect law of Allah, may He be praised above all others, your corrupt and Islamic infiltrated justice system failed to find the Muslim Brotherhood of Islam guilty of anything. This again shows how inept and ineffectual your system has become because of the power of Allah; praise His name, and the successful infiltration by Islam of every aspect of your government and culture.

'And finally, we appreciate you letting us fleece you without end. You will be glad to know we have been accumulating shares in your banks, real estate, and publicly held companies. We also finance a good portion of your debt and now manipulate your markets, currency, and economies to our benefit. Praise be to Muhammad our prophet and Allah the God of this earth! And thank you America for doing Allah’s will in supporting Islam in Allah’s quest to subjugate this Earth. Soon all the Earth will be at peace under Sharia Law, The perfect law of Allah.

By now you should be learning to accept your dependence on the Nation of Islam as you have been indoctrinated through our use of your ignorant media, so that the complete subjugation of your country will be forthcoming as we are doing so successfully in the Western culture of Europe and the most resent takeover of the Phoenician nation of Lebanon. Praise be to Allah!

Thanks again so much for your cooperation,

Your willing benefactor, the Ministry of OPEC…

THE BOTTOM LINE: This of course is fictitiously written in the theme of Orson Wells “The War Of The Worlds” with one important difference, the content is true, documented, and factual. If any Minister of OPEC were to be totally honest as to their intention and agenda, he would write a letter just like this.

I hope this has been both entertaining and frightening. It should scare you right out of your Muslim gas tank, because as I said, the content is true.

Please think very carefully about the future of your freedom and the freedom of your children as you cast your vote for American leadership this November…
Just a side note:
A lot of folks can't understand how we came to have an oil shortage here in our country in the first place. Well, there's a very simple answer, nobody bothered to check the oil.
We just didn't know we were getting low. The reason for that is purely geographical. Our OIL is located in Alaska, California, Coastal Florida, Coastal Louisiana, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Our dipsticks are located in Washington, DC Any Questions? NO? Didn’t think so.

Thanks to one of my faithful readers named Ron for the original article.

de Andréa

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

The Energy Question

Is the answer to the energy crises, the wind, or solar, or the hamster wheel maybe???

By de Andréa
July 22, 2008

While America is divided about just how to proceed in solving this problem of energy or the lack thereof, we are still paying an ever increasing price for the fuel that runs our lives our economy and our country.

There is no doubt that cheep energy is what contributed to American prosperity, and it is the refueling in air tanker that has made America a superpower. We are what we are, because of our values and our oil. Over the last several decades it seams that we have been incrementally losing both.

So what is the answer? Well, as for our values, we should probably look to God. But for energy; shouldn’t we look to wind, solar, or nuclear? How about coal, or wood, or thermo solar? Maybe natural gas or propane, or bio-diesel, I’m thinking garbage, we certainly have enough of it. I remember an idea someone had, which was to harness the tides. Then there is the making of alcohol from food, or stripping the hydrogen out of water. Oh! I almost forgot, there is always drilling for our own oil. But then isn’t it the lack of drilling for our own oil that got us into this fiasco in the first place?

Yes, I think is was these green weed hugging people that thought that oil was dirty, well at least it wasn’t green. Moreover, it created a lot of smoke, kind’ a like when the green people said that we should let Yellowstone burn because it was natural. It may have been natural alright but it sure wasn’t green. But I digress.

The point is that while we have become greener, we have become a dependent nation, and we are fast loosing our independence and the superpower status that protects it. Do you realize that we are almost totally dependent on a foreign power for the life blood of this nation? Moreover this foreign nation is not only our enemy but the enemy of the free world. Do you realize just how really insane this is? If we the people don’t turn this around and soon, this nation will become an historical 200 year good try at independence and liberty.

So while we are all sitting around being green, just what kind of energy do we pursue? Answer… everything; all of the above. Yes anything that burns and or produces energy, such as the liberal newspapers. More than just finding an answer to our energy problems, we must do it as an independent country.

It is astonishing just how short sighted America has become. We are so blinded by our own selfish hypocrisy that we can no longer see beyond the end of our nose. The primary goal should be how we can once again, become energy independent; regardless of what color it is, green as spinach, or as black as coal.

We are now supporting our enemy to the tune of nearly a trillion American dollars a year. We are totally financing our enemy’s war against us… Am I… the only one out hear that understands just how totally insane this is? But de Andréa, its okay, we are green.

The United States of America has the historical reputation of meeting any challenge, as well as out producing any country in the world. If we still have the will to survive and if we are willing to make some temporary sacrifices, we could be energy independent in five years.

Once we have shed ourselves of the dependence on our enemy, we can then do whatever research we would like to find a clean green alternative renewable energy. Besides that, the war would be over. In the mean time we should use what ever is necessary to independently power up this country with oil, wood, coal, nuclear and anything else we can use, yes including the hamster wheel if we have to.

While we encourage the green-people to develop wind, solar, thermo, garbage, hydrogen, and hamster power the rest of us can build oil refineries, nuclear, liquefied coal, and drill for crude before Cuba and China get it all. We have shale-oil; we can help Canada develop their oil-sands. Come on we put a man on the moon and built the Continental Railroad, more importantly we invented TANG…

THE BOTTOM LINE: Yes the bottom line is we need to have a group hug and stop all this bickering, put aside our partisan ideologies, and start working together to save what we have left of America. Trust me in five years we can all go back to fighting about green things and which weed needs the biggest hug. Remember if we can’t save ourselves, we certainly cannot save the planet.

Please forgive me for bashing my liberal green brothers; or not. Right now, I think I need a hug…

de Andréa

Monday, July 21, 2008

The Medal of Honor

PO2 (EOD2) Mike Monsoor, a Navy EOD Technician, has been posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for throwing himself on a grenade in Iraq, giving his life to save his fellow SEALS.

During Mike Monsoor's funeral in San Diego, as his coffin was being moved from the hearse to the grave site at Ft. Rosecrans National Cemetery, SEALs were lined-up on both sides of the pallbearers' route forming a column of twos, with the coffin moving up the center.

As Mike's coffin passed, each SEAL, having removed the gold Trident from his own uniform, slapped it down hard, embedding the Trident in the lid of the wooden coffin.The slaps were so audible they could be heard from across the cemetery. By the time the coffin arrived at the grave side, it looked as though it had a gold inlay from all the Tridents pinned to it. This was a fitting send-off for an extraordinary warrior hero.

This should be front-page news but alas it is not, instead, the “Hate America Alphabet Media” reports that our fighting men are killing babies and innocent old women.

Since the media won't make this news, I choose to make it news by posting it here for all the world to see. I am proud and thankful for our military and for the free America they fight for.

If you are proud too, please share this with someone you love, and pass this on. If not, then rest assured that these fine men and women of our military will continue to serve and protect you, and our free Nation.

God Bless America…

de Andréa

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Today London, Tomorrow New York

So you don’t believe that in the near future the U. S. will be controlled by Islam? A few years ago the British didn’t believe it either. Now for the Brits it is too late; it's already a reality

By de Andréa

American Christians face charges of 'hate crimes' for preaching Christianity. Pastors are told they can't spread Jesus' message in a Muslim area, and because much of England is now under Sharia law soon all of England will be Muslim, the theocracy of oppressive peace.

According to the Arch Bishop of Canterbury the leader of the Church of England, the only way to have peace in Great Britain is to implement Islamic Sharia law, and become subjects and slaves of Islam. Read the article.

Recently two American-born pastors handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham England, were threatened with arrest and warned of being beaten for committing what a British officer called a "hate crime."

Arthur Cunningham, 48, and Joseph Abraham, 65, were handing out the leaflets and talking with local youths when they were approached and questioned by a police officer.
He said we were in a Muslim area and were not allowed to spread our Christian message," Cunningham told the London Telegraph. "He said we were committing a hate crime by telling the youths to leave Islam and said that he was going to take us to the police station."

The ministers also claim the officers bullied them, saying, "You have been warned. If you come back here you will get beaten up, you have been warned."

The incident fuels the fact that there are areas in Britain where the Christian message is increasingly unwelcome.

In April, Rev. Michael Nazir-Ali, bishop of Rochester and the Church of England's only Pakistan-born bishop, wrote in the Telegraph that certain pockets of England were becoming "no-go" zones, places too dangerous for non-Muslims, even police to enter.

Joseph Abraham, one of the threatened pastors agrees. He told the paper, "I couldn't believe this was happening in Britain, but Rev. Michael Nazir-Ali was right; there are certainly no-go areas for Christians, Jews and all infidels. The Kaffaar is not welcome here.

How much longer will it be before there are places in America that are no-go areas for the Kaffaar? How much longer??? They already exist. Hamtramck, Michigan for one example where the entire city is controlled by Islam, and DEARBORN, Mich. Officials are working on a plan that would bring special Islamic halal food to several Dearborn schools by this fall. Pork has been outlawed in many California schools as well as pig paraphernalia such as piggy banks and cartoon characters such as Miss Piggy and Porky Pig. Entire tax payer supported public schools are now totally Islamic like the one in Grove Heights, Minnesota.

This is just a few of the local cities and schools; moreover, this doesn’t even address the infiltration of the U.S. Military by Islam or our security agencies by Islamic terrorist’s organizations. And this is just the ground work that is being laid down for a future Jihad.

A complete change of ones culture does not happen over night, but if allowed to get started and continue, it will surreptitiously and incrementally take place just as it did in the Christian Democracy of Lebanon which is now completely controlled by Muslim terrorists and under Sharia Law. Europe will soon follow the same deception and America will soon be the last free nation to fall into the abyss of Islamic tyranny.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Can’t happen you say in the most powerful nation on earth. Well it is happening, right here, right now, just as it happened in every nation that is now part of the nation of Islam. The nasty thing about repeating history is that if one makes the same mistake one will get the same result.

While Islam is quietly busy --- The Giant Sleeps...

de Andréa

Monday, July 14, 2008

Once a Muslim always a Muslim

Just as a Marine is always a Marine a Muslim is always a Muslim

By de Andrea

In an effort to combat what it calls Internet smears, Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign recently launched a website with the stated aimed at supporting the deception of setting the record straight.

Oh yes let’s please do that!
One of the main issues addressed by Obama's "Fight the Smears" site is the contention the Illinois senator was once a Muslim. "Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian," states the site.

So yes, let us please set the record straight
First, the so-called [C]hristian church that Obama has attended for the past twenty years is a Black Muslim church, with Muslim hate ideologies and doctrines. The staff associates with Muslims and they hold Muslims in high esteem. If it talks, walks, and looks like a Muslim, well just maybe it is a Muslim. Christian Churches Black or otherwise do not preach hate, but Muslims do…Black Christian pastors do not wear Black Muslim skull caps but Black Muslims do.

Public records in Indonesia listed Obama as a Muslim during his early years, and a number of childhood friends claimed to the media Obama was a mosque-attending Muslim. Obama's campaign has several times wavered in response to reporters queries regarding the issue of Obama's childhood faith.

Commenting on a recent Los Angeles Times report quoting a childhood friend stating Obama prayed in a mosque – something the presidential candidate said he never did – Obama's campaign released a statement explaining the senator "has never been a practicing Muslim."

The issue of Obama's Muslim background has dogged the candidate amid multiple scandals involving his now former Chicago church and several spiritual advisers. As well as his connection to high-ranking black Muslims and terrorist’s organizations.

The issue re-emerged in recent months following conflicting media accounts of Obama's enrollment as a Muslim during elementary school in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation.

Widely distributed reports have noted that in January 1968, Obama was registered as a Muslim at Jakarta's Roman Catholic Franciscus Assisi Primary School under the name Barry Soetoro. If Obama’s name was Barry Soetoro, one should ask why would he change it to Barack Hussein Obama. He was listed as an Indonesian citizen whose stepfather, listed on school documents as "L Soetoro Ma," worked for the topography department of the Islamic Indonesian Army.

After attending the Assisi Primary School, Obama was enrolled – also as a Muslim, according to documents – in the Besuki Primary School, a public school in Jakarta.

The Loatze blog, run by an American expatriate in Southeast Asia who visited the Besuki school, noted, "All Indonesian students are required to study religion at school, and a young 'Barry Soetoro,' being a Muslim, would have been required to study Islam daily in school. He would have been taught to read and write Arabic, to recite his prayers properly, to read and recite from the Quran, and to study the Sharia laws of Islam."

Indeed, the Israel Insider online magazine points out that in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams From My Father," he acknowledges studying the Quran and describes the public school as "a Muslim school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Quranic studies," wrote Obama.

The Indonesian media have been flooded with accounts of Obama's childhood Islamic studies, some describing him as a religious Wahhabist Muslim.

Speaking to the country's Kaltim Post, Tine Hahiyary, who was principal of Obama's school while he was enrolled there, said she recalls he studied the Quran in Arabic.

"At that time, I was not Barry's teacher, but he is still in my memory" claimed Tine, who is 80 years old. The Kaltim Post says Obama's teacher, named Hendri, died. "I remember that he studied 'mengaji (recitation of the Quran)," Tine said, according to an English translation by Loatze.

Mengaji, or the act of reading the Quran with its correct Arabic punctuation, is usually taught to more religious pupils and is not known as a secular study.

Also, Loatze documented the Indonesian daily Banjarmasin Post caught up with Rony Amir, an Obama classmate and Muslim, who describe Obama as "previously quite religious in Islam. We previously often asked him to the prayer room close to the house. If he was wearing a sarong (waist fabric worn for religious or casual occasions) he looked funny," Amir said.

The Los Angeles Times, which sent a reporter to Jakarta, quoted Zulfin Adi, who identified himself as among Obama's closest childhood friends, stating the presidential candidate prayed in a mosque, something Obama's campaign claimed he never did.
"We prayed, but not really seriously, just following actions done by older people in the mosque. But as kids, we loved to meet our friends and went to the mosque together and played," said Adi.
Friday prayers
Aside from the new site to fight purported smears, Obama's official campaign site has a page titled "Obama has never been a Muslim, and is a committed Christian." The page states, "Obama never prayed in a mosque. He has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United Church of Christ."

But the campaign conveniently changed its tune when it issued its "practicing Muslim" clarification to the L.A. Times. An article in March by the Chicago Tribune apparently disputes Adi's statements to the L.A. paper. The Tribune caught up with Obama's declared childhood friend, who now describes himself as only knowing Obama for a few months in 1970 when his family moved to the neighborhood. Adi said he was unsure about his recollections of Obama.

But the Tribune found Obama did attend mosque.
Interviews with dozens of former classmates, teachers, neighbors, and friends show that Obama was a regular practicing Muslim when he was in Indonesia, the presidential candidate's former neighbors and 3rd grade teacher recalling Obama followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers. Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, notes the Tribune article – cited by liberal blogs as refuting claims Obama is Muslim – actually implies Obama was a regular practicing Muslim and twice confirms Obama attended mosque services.

In a free-ranging interview with the New York Times, Obama described the Muslim call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." The Times' Nicholos Kristof wrote Obama recited, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent," the opening lines of the Muslim call to prayer.

The first few lines of the call to prayer state:

"Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme!

Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme!

I witness that there is no god but Allah

I witness that there is no god but Allah

I witness that Muhammad is his prophet... "

Some attention also has been paid to Obama's paternal side of the family. His father, described in some reports as an atheist, polygamist, and alcoholic, was buried in Kenya as a Muslim. Obama Sr., also named Barack Obama, had three sons with another woman who reportedly all are Muslim.

Obama's brother Roy is a practicing Muslim.
Writing in a chapter of his book describing his 1992 wedding, the presidential candidate stated: "The person who made me proudest of all was Roy. Actually, now we call him Abongo, his Islamic Luo name, two years ago he decided to reassert his African heritage. He converted to Islam, and has sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol."

Still, Obama says he was raised by his Christian mother and repeatedly has labeled as "smears" several reports attempting to paint him as a Muslim.

Meanwhile, Obama's new anti-smear website also denies claims by bloggers and commentators of the existence of a tape in which Obama's wife Michelle is said to rail against "whitey.” Other issues addressed by the site include claims Obama is hiding his birth certificate or that he won't recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Whether or not Barack Hussein Obama as he calls himself, is really a Muslim terrorist plant or not, is irrelevant. The very fact that there is a connection between Barack and a Muslim background should set off all the bells sirens and lights.

Lets make up a little scenario: Let’s say that a boy named Frantz Schmitt was born in this country in about 1908. His Mother was American and his father was German born. In 1917 the family moved to Germany. Later Frantz’s father became involved in the Nazi party, and in 1920 Frantz was enrolled in a Nazi youth school, in 1935 Frantz returned to the US and ran for Senator, after being elected he ran for President of the United States in 1942. Despite Frantz’s background and connections to the Nazi party, Frantz claimed that he was not a Nazi because of his American Mother and his good friend Reverend Hendrick Von Claptrap a swastika wearing Nazi, posing as a Christian Pastor.

Do you really, really believe Frantz would even been able to immigrate back to this country? If yes he likely would have ended up in a camp until after the war, but certainly he would not have gotten to first base with an American Political career much less run for President.

But thanks to the successful deceptive indoctrination of America by Islam, and like Nazism, we don’t really know what a Muslim is. Moreover we don’t even know who we are at war with.
Moreover, just what has Obama done in Politics to prepare him to lead the most powerful country on earth??? Read this...

May God save us from ourselves…

de Andréa

Monday, July 07, 2008

Muslims in the White House???

It is not only Barack that walks, talks, and looks like a Muslim; his wife Michele expresses the same Muslim superior ideology found in the Quran.

By de Andréa

Princeton was requested by the would be first lady to put a 'restriction' on distribution of any copies of her thesis of (a/k/a/ Michelle LaVaughn Robinson) saying it could not be made available until after November 5, 2008 but when it was leaked to a political website they decided to lift the restriction.

Subject: Thesis - Michele Obama aka Michelle LaVaughn Robinson

Michelle Obama’s militant racism exposed. But is it racism as some say, or is it Islam

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on crime and hatred'. It is hard to believe that Michele, who majored in Sociology which I am sure, must have included at least some American history, could she have so totally missed the bus on the historical fundamental Judeo Christian values of America that she could have graduated with the understanding that America was founded on Crime and Hatred.

Moreover, she stated that whites in America were 'ineradicably racist'. The 1985 thesis, titled 'Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community' was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson. Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms 'separationist' and 'integrationist' when describing the views of black people. Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a 'separationist' view of race. It is clear that Michele is the racist one here and not the society she accuses. Michele writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.”

Michele Obama either has a chip on her shoulder or she has a distinct conviction of superiority. Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world. This is the same ideology of Islam, and is why Islam cannot subscribe to freedom. Equality is one of the fundamental values of freedom, but if Blacks and or Islam are superior to the Whites and or the Kuffaar then there can be no equality and therefore no freedom.

The preoccupation with this imaginary American foundation of Hate and crime certainly did not come from an American history book, but it certainly is found in the Quran and in Islamic History. Could it be that Michele is confused between her ideologies. And thinks she can have one foot in the American dream and the other in the world of Black Islam where there is a fundamental drive toward hate and crime???

Another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning: “'There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.” What is Michele Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white or Muslim over American? The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.

Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”

I can’t help but wondering what Michele does with all black colleges or for example the all black organization NAACP.

The conclusion of her thesis is also alarming. Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness or her preoccupation of the haltered of white America. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that the black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. “I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that! despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input. Michele Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another. The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration. Michelle Obama's intellectually refined superiority should give all Americans pause for deep concern.

She sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America . Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously hateful comments about American whites? I am sure that it will.

A parting note; the America that Michele hates so much is the same America that paid for her education.

Here is the link to with this information stating it is true...............
Urban Legends Reference Pages: Michelle Obama's Thesis

As always the facts are documented but the opinions are mine…

de Andréa

Islam Through Muslim Eyws

The following article might be of some help in understanding what a Muslim is, and shed some light and insight into how the Muslim mind works.

A while back I wrote an article titled “Islam Through Christian Eyes”. It was to explain why it is so difficult for a Christian or a Westerner to comprehend Islam.

This essay hopefully will explain what, as well as why.

It is an in-depth study of why and how we came to tap dance around the truth and more importantly the result.

By de Andréa

Bear in Mind, that I am not trying to make the case, or to insinuate in any way, that the eyes or mind of a Muslim is structurally different than anyone else’s. The difference in the way the eyes see or the mind works is the programming. Yes just as in a computer or any other mechanism that receives input, what goes in, is what comes out. And as the old saying goes garbage in garbage out.

This is rather lengthy as well as having links to other sites to look up, so it will be number one on the site for about a week so take your time it is a must read, especially if you are confused as to what a Muslim is, moderate or otherwise.

The following, is a unique insight into the twisted mind and religion of a Muslim.
In the processes of attempting to comprehend the mind of a Muslim or more importantly what it means to be a Muslim, we all too often program ourselves or each other with faulty information, and as I said, garbage in garbage out, and it spreads like a virus, and does as much damage. This faulty programming is givin power by misidentification. Identifying aspects if Islam by giving them names, ignorant Western names as seen though Western eyes.

Let’s start with some of the many names, words, and phrases we use about Islam that are muddled and incorrect. Many non-Muslims, “Westerners” create certain terms about Islam to try to make the world seem safer and to feel good about themselves. But many of these terms have no actual basis in Islamic theology or culture and have no real meaning in an Islamic context.

I think the best way to start is to begin with the term “moderate Muslim."
“Moderate Muslim” is a perfect example of the muddle and incorrect terminology that the kuffaar or kafir use. (Kuffaar, or Kafir is a derogatory word for unbelievers or non Muslims)

This term “Moderate” is intended to describe a Muslim who doesn’t seem so dangerous or advocate violence. But “moderate Muslim” is not a Muslim term; it is one that kuffaars made up. The doctrine of Islam does talk about the different kinds of Muslims. The measure of a Muslim is the Quran the hadith and the Sunna. Anyone who follows these teachings is a Muslim, by definition.

Islamic doctrine defines what a so-called moderate is and is not. Since we are dealing with Islam, we need to know that the doctrine is progressive and teaches duality. . Islam can have two doctrines about any issue. The early part of the Quran, which was written in Mecca, beginning in about the year 610 AD, is generally religious. The part of the Quran written in Medina after Muhammad was driven out of Mecca, is very political and militant, and includes jihad. The two parts of the Quran are not only very different, but they also contradict each other in major ways. The Muslim rational for this is that the later part of the Quran supersedes the former part of the Quran in the case of conflict. Or even more confusing to the Western mind is that despite the contradiction, both can be simultaneously correct.

So without this cognizance we have the misunderstanding of two kinds of Muslims, since we have two doctrines, but as we shall see it is irrelevant. Osama bin Laden is a “moderate Muslim”, who specifically follows the Quran of Medina, the Koran of jihad. Kuffaars call him an extremist or radical Muslim. Actually, Osama obeys the Quran of Medina and the Sunna of Mohammed, so he is a moderate, pious Muslim of Medinan and not in the slightest bit, extreme...

The Jihadists on September 11, 2001 were all moderate Medinan Muslims. They were not extremists or radicals just Muslims doing what Muslims do.

The other kind of moderate Muslim claim to follow the Quran of Mecca and might be more generally what kuffaars mean when they say “moderate Muslim”. But how moderate is a Meccan Muslim? A Meccan Muslim thinks that you are a kuffaar, but he may or may not be violent enough to kill you even though he would support those that would, his roll in Islam will be just to support Jihad in any way he can. All are not called to be directly involved in violent/militant Jihad. But all Muslims are called to support the advancement of the Agenda of Islam which is to subjugate the world under Sharia law and to bow down to Allah the god of this earth.

So, for example, just what exactly is a “kuffaar” or sometimes spelled “kafir”. We take it to mean “unbeliever” but it is more complicated than that, remember this is how the mind of a Muslim works. The usual translation of this Arabic word is unbeliever as in the word Infidel, but unbeliever is only a very small part of the meaning of Kuffaar. It is the Quran that defines its meaning. The Quran says that the most terrible things can happen to the kafir. The Qu’ranic doctrine about “kafirs” or “kuffaars” says they are hated and are Satan’s friends. Kafirs can be robbed, tortured, raped, mocked, cursed, condemned, plotted against and murdered.
The “Koran” or “Quran” does not have one good thing to say about kafirs. (There are some pseudo-good words, but more about those later.) Over the last 1400 years, 270 million kafirs have died as a result of the so-called moderate political doctrine of Islam. It is the biggest single source of suffering in the history of the world. And you thought the Nazis were the worst. No my friend, Nazism is just a mild spin-off of the Islamic ideology.

The word “kafir” or “kuffaar” is the worst word in the human language. It is far worse than the n-word, for someone of the black race, because the n-word is a personal opinion, whereas, kafir is Allah’s decree. Nearly two thirds of the Koran is devoted to the vicious treatment of the kafir. Islam is fixated on the subjugation or the destruction of the kafir and the moderate Muslim believes that you are a kafir, and therefore must be hated, converted, be made slaves of, or killed. That is a so-called “Moderate Muslim’ my friend How moderate is that?

The moderation does not stop there. A moderate Muslim follows Islamic ethics. Not only is the Koran a dualistic or progressive document, but also Islamic ethics are dualistic and progressive. Islam has one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for the kafirs. A Muslim does not lie, cheat, kill, or harm another “real” Muslim, as you can see the emphases is on real. But, if it will advance the purpose and agenda of Islam, a kafir may be cheated, deceived, murdered, tortured, and raped. Or on the other hand, a Muslim may deceivingly (with the doctrine of Taqiya or Taqiyyah) treat a kafir like a brother.

It is this progressiveness and dualism of Islam that gives it such power. It has the entire good cop/bad cop psychology built into its very DNA. Islam deceivingly has the good cop face to the world most of the time. The bad cop is held in reserve the same way that a police detective carries a hidden weapon.

Muslim Charity
The ethical dualism means that Islam does not take part in the shared reciprocity of altruism. As an example, Islam is very big on charities, but Islamic charities only go to Muslims, and then not out of love and caring but as a sense of duty. When Saudi Arabia foe example, sent money to New Orleans after hurricane Katrina, the money only went to Muslims, not to suffering kafirs. Most Islamic charities however go to the Islamic cause or agenda of advancing Islam, that we call terrorists extremists organizations.

Reciprocity of altruism is the very basis of modern civilization. Islam does not share this trait. This is one of the reasons that Islam can not be a part of the rest of civilization. Islam is built on different ethics and logic than the kafirs. Islam’s dualistic ethics prohibit reciprocity of altruism. Islamic civilization and kafir civilization do not share the same values. This is why it is so difficult for the Judeao Christian West to understand The Nation of Islam

So a “moderate non-violent Muslim” thinks that you are a kafir and that a kafir is not to be treated the same as a Muslim. The moderate Muslim (Islamic meaning) believes that you are Allah’s scum and you can be treated like trash. How can such a person be a true friend, if he believes the Koran. In some 14 verses, the Koran says that the Muslim is not the friend of a kafir. In any case, the term moderate Muslim has two totally different meanings. The kafir meaning is warm, fuzzy, and incorrect. The Islamic meaning is cruel, precise and correct.

Some other false kafir names
Radical Islam, Muslim extremist, reformed Islam.
What is a radical Muslim? A radical Muslim is capable of harming kafirs. A radical Muslim is a Medinan Muslim, but a Medinan Muslim follows Mohammed’s actions. So killing kafirs is not radical. Harming kafirs follows Mohammed’s example and is pure Islam, not a radical interpretation.

So, overall, the real issue here is Islam, these false names used by kafirs are an attempt to humanize Islam. The kafirized naming of “Moderate Islam” tries to put the violence (radical, extremist) outside of Islam or suggest that violence is a bizarre interpretation of Islamic doctrine. But Mohammed himself defines moderation, and violence as integral to Islam.

The doctrine of both religious and political Islam is based on progressivism and dualism and submission. The religious doctrine is of no concern to a kafir. It is the politics that concerns kafirs. Political Islam is also based upon dualism and submission. All of humanity is divided into kafirs and Muslims, with not one good word for the kafirs.

Names like “moderate” and “good” are an attempt to link goodness with Islam. But there is no goodness in Islam for the kafir, not even for the Muslim, because even Muslims are deceived about their own religion and politics. This may seem extremely harsh, but it is a consequence of the doctrine of religious and political Islam.

If you are well-read in the Islamic political doctrine, you may jump in and say that the Korans says positive things about Christians and Jews but these are Taqiya or Taqiyyah’---Islamic deception (true lies). These few seemingly good things are a very few sentences. It is sad to see how Muslims and apologists drag the pitiful few sentences out of the Koran to attempt to show the good in Islam for the kafirs. First, compared to the massive amount of hateful, hurtful, and evil things said about the kafirs, the few good sentences are statistically insignificant and as I said they are a deception as is the whole Koran.
But worst of all is that the good verses are contradicted by later doctrine. This is another aspect of progressivism and dualism. The doctrine of Islam is not static since it is based upon the life of Mohammed. The doctrine describes a process. The conclusion of that process was annihilation of the native Arab culture with not a single enemy of Mohammed left standing. In the end, there is no good in Islam, none.

Most kafirs treat the doctrine of Islam like a box of those magnetic words you can put on the refrigerator. By choosing the right words, one can make any sentence and any thought. But the doctrine of Islam is a very progressive story. It has a beginning, middle and an end. Islamic doctrine is taken from the life of Mohammed, not from a dictionary of unrelated facts. The most important part of the Koran is its conclusion.

The conclusion is that Islam is always bad for the kafir. In the end, all kafirs, Christians and Jews must submit to Islam. this submition is what Muslims believe is the goodness of Islam for kafirs. As long as the kafirs submit to Islam’s demands, and pay the protection money (The Jiza) then Islam is good to them. It is called dhimmitude a subservient paid for protected people. Not unlike the protection rackets of the Sicilian Mafias of New York City and Chicago in the 1930’s, they like Hitler also read the Koran

Progressive dualism and deception is the key to understanding Islam.
On the surface many parts of the Koran contradict each other. The usual explanation is that the older, nicer verses are abrogated by the later more violent verses. But in reality all of the Koran is true since it comes from the only god, Allah. Allah is perfection, and therefore, the contradictory statements in the Koran are all true. This violates Aristotelian kafir logic, but it defines the Islamic dualistic logic. In Islam two contradictory things can both be true at the same time, so for every one of those statistically insignificant “good” verses, each one is weak, and the stronger harsh and violent verses are stronger. Contradictions are integral to Islamic logic. To put a fine point on the previous claim—the only good for kafirs in the doctrine of political Islam is negated somewhere else.

Are there any good Muslims?
Islam is the cause; Muslims are the effect. So if there is no good in Islam for a kafir, how is there any good in a Muslim for a kafir? There is not any good in a Muslim for kafirs. Cause and effect. If there are any good Muslims which is what the kafir wants to believe, then the good Muslims that claim to be Muslims are not Muslims. Or the Muslim that claims to be good is deceiving the kafir.
Now we get to our central problem. The doctrinal problem here is that a Muslim cannot be the friend of a kafir. The Koran says this 14 times. So if a friend is a Muslim, then that friendship has to be based on deception.

Notice that Islam has a strong core doctrine of mutual Muslims friendship; indeed the Koran says that Muslims are brothers and sisters to each other. Only Muslims can be friends because they are equal. But a Muslim is not equal to a kafir because the Koran says that a Muslim is superior. So where does the so-called good person who is a Muslim get his basis for friendship? The same place as everyone else, from equality. The equality that is inferred from the Golden Rule.

The Golden rule says; treat others as you want to be treated.
Which others? All others, without exception, the Golden Rule implies the unity of humanity. There are no limits to its application. However the Golden Rule does not apply to Islam. Indeed, Islam denies the truth of the Golden Rule. The duality of Islam divides all humanity into Muslims and kafirs. There are no two groups more unequal than kafirs and Muslims. So what do we call a Muslim that seems to be a friend of a kafir? The possible goodness in your Muslim friend comes from the kafir civilization, not Islam. Your friend is either deceiving you or he is no longer a Muslim, he is Westernized, I call them a “MINO” a (Muslim In Name Only) a kafirized Muslim, although he may not admit it. But he is not a good or a moderate Muslim. Remember, Osama bin Laden is a good and moderate Muslim.

A true Muslim has absolutely no attraction to any aspect of kafir culture. The Koran and Sunna condemn 100% of kafir culture, so no Muslim has any desire to emulate kafirs. As soon as a Muslim has any attraction to any aspect of kafir culture, they cease to be a Muslim and become kafir. That is the way the doctrine of Islam works. The name kafirized or Westernized Muslim is analytic and fits the data. The usual names, (good Muslim, moderate Muslim), attempt to credit the good found in Muslims to the doctrine of Islam. The term kafirized Muslim clearly states that the good comes from the kafirs, not Islam.

Now we get to the crux of the politics of the fallacious naming. These names represent a desperate attempt of the West to deal with the problem of Islamic threats, violence, and destruction of kafir civilization. This is looking at Islam through Judeo Christian Eyes. Very few people know much about either the doctrine or history of Islam. So they think of Islam as only a religion and believe since Islam has so many members, it must be one of the great religions. And all religions are seen as good, so Islam must be good. But there is this nagging dark feeling about the violence in Islam. Since Islam has been defined as good, there must be an explanation. Those Muslims who kill must be “extremist” Muslims. This is as I said, looking at Islam through Western or Judeao Christian eyes and it sees Islam as good with just a few rotten apples that spoil the barrel.

Right from the beginning in Islam, Mohammed, Ali, Umar, Abu Bakr and all of the rest of the founding Muslims would have to be identified as “extremist” Muslims since they were killers. Over and over again, what kafirs call extremism is only mainstream Islam, period.

A reformed IslamSome in the West think we can change Islam and come up with the thinking that if Islam has nothing good for Muslims or kafirs, then why not reform it? There is a group of Muslims attempting to do just that, called MUSLIMS AGAINST SHARIA, (for more Information on this organization click here) this idea comes from making an analogy to Christianity. However, Islam’s claims aside, there are almost no points of comparison between Islam and Christianity, only total opposition. On the issue of ethics or values, for instance, there is absolutely no analogy. Islam is truly an aptitude to Christianity and Judaism.

The religion of Islam needs no reform. The kafir generally doesn’t care how Muslims worship? All kafirs must be concerned with is the part of Islam that is political or how Islam defines them. The problem with ignoring the religious part of Islam is that it is what drives the political theocracy of Islam. The Koran, the Sira and the Hadith determine the treatment of kafirs religiously and politically.

To reform the Koran, as the “Muslims against Sharia web site proposes”, all of the hateful, cruel, and bigoted references to kafirs would have to be removed. If the kafir material is removed, then only 39% of the Koran remains. The greatest part of the Koran, 61%, is devoted to negativity about kafirs.

The Sira (the life of Mohammed) has about 75% of its material devoted to jihad.
The Hadith has 20% of its material devoted to jihad. There is no one positive reference to kafirs.If you delete 61% of the Koran, 75% of the Sira and 20% of the Hadith, you will have reformed Islam. You will also have destroyed it, which might be a good thing. So there is a very good reason why Islam has never been reformed. It is impossible.

Is it so hard to believe that a political system with the name “submission” (that is what the word Islam means) is violent, can be reformed?

To submit is a demand of force.
Why would Islam want to reform? It works. You don’t fix a system that works.
The other objection to Islamic reform is that there is no central hierarchy that makes decision for Muslims. Anyone can read the doctrine and decide what to do. No one has the authority to decide what every Muslim can do. In that way, Islam is like the Internet; it is a distributed system with no central doctrinal authority. Who speaks for Islam? Mohammed. Who interprets Mohammed? Any Muslim.

You may have a kafirized Muslim, but there is no such thing as kafirized Islam. Islam cannot be reformed. Hence, the name reformed Islam is only a kafirs ignorant dream.

So you see, right names help to think right thoughts. Muddled names lead to muddled thoughts. If we are serious, we must start using the right names to describe Islam. Our terms must be based upon Islam, not a kafirs ignorant western dream.

All of this analysis is based upon a kafir-centric view. There are three ways to examine Islam—Muslim, kafir and dhimmah or dhimmi

The Muslim believer-centric view is the standard Islamic viewpoint. For the believer, the Koran is the perfect word of the only god of the universe and Mohammed is the prefect pattern for all human life and all times.

Kafir-centric analysis looks at Islam from the viewpoint of the kafir; (Western eyes) how does this affect us? Kafir-centric analysis is the view of the victim. As an example, in the Sira, Mohammed’s triumph over the Meccan polytheists is told as a wonderful victory. From the view of the kafir, it represents the annihilation of a tolerant society and the creation of the modern apartheid state of Arabia. As a result of Islam, the Arabs went from being a tolerant people to being the most bigoted and biased society on earth. The kafir-centric school is skeptical and analytic.

The dhimmi-centric viewpoint is the academic school and is neither fish nor fowl. It is marked by political correctness and never refers to the deaths of the 270 million kafirs, never talks about the suffering of the dhimmis. The dhimmi-centric school is actually believer-centric lite. It rarely applies skepticism. The dhimmi-centric school is the predominate school in the universities, military, law enforcement, government and the media. The dhimmi-centric school is very fond of using modern political science to analyze Islam. One of the marks of the dhimmi-centric school is to ignore Islamic political theory. For instance, jihad is never used to explain violence. Or Israel is seen only as a modern political state and the Palestinians are just another political group. Reading the Israelis news stories, you would never know that Islam had a doctrine of war. But when you read the communications of the Palestinian leaders, it is crystal clear that it is jihad against the kafirs in Israel. From the standpoint of Islam, if every Jew in Israel were a Hindu, virtually nothing would change, they would still be the kafir. .

Multiculturalism is all the rage these days. What is strange is that only the believer-centric school and the kafir-centric theory explain Islam by its doctrine. The dhimmi-centric academic school avoids this at all costs. This is ironic since it was the academics that created multiculturalism. So the dhimmah-centric school is bigoted and euro-centric by its own standards of multiculturalism.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Hopefully one can now understand why it matters how one identifies an issue. Just as calling an illegal alien an undocumented worker somehow excuses the federal Government from doing its constitutional duty of protecting this nation from a foreign invasion at our borders. Article Four - Section Four of the US Constitution this includes among other things which are also ignored, a commitment by the Federal Government to protect this Nation from violence and a foreign invasion. Referring to Muslims as moderate also excuses them from protecting American citizens from our enemy, the Nation of Islam. One can then argue, why would we need to protect ourselves from someone that is peaceful and means us no harm?

The source of this problem is ignorance and deception. The result could be the end of freedom and the advancement of tyranny and oppression…

de Andréa
From Muslims Against Sharia
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:46:30 -0700From: noreply-comment@blogger.comTo: writedeandrea@hotmail.comSubject: [The Bottom Line] New comment on Islam Through Muslim Eyws.Muslims Against Sharia has left a new comment on your post "Islam Throught Muslim Eyws":
"If the kafir material is removed, then only 39% of the Koran remains. The greatest part of the Koran, 61%, is devoted to negativity about kafirs."Just out of curiosity, have you eve read the Koran or do you enjoy puling numbers out of thin air? Posted by Muslims Against Sharia to The Bottom Line at 3:46 PM

Reply to Muslims against Sharia From: writedeandrea@hotmail.comTo:; writedeandrea@hotmail.comSubject: RE: [The Bottom Line] New comment on Islam Through Muslim Eyes.Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:30:23 -0700
Yes as a matter of fact I have, the difference is that I have read this unholy book without being deceived as to what it teaches and what the Agenda of Islam is. In your previous responses, you mistakenly tried to compare the reform of Christianity with your deception of Islamic reform. The fundamental difference is, when Christianity was reformed, the 'People' were reformed, not the Scriptures written by Jehovah God. The reformation in your Manifesto doesn't reform any Muslims but it does arbitrarily erase and replace your god Allah's words. The Question I have for you is, Just who gives you the authority to do this???
de Andrea

Friday, July 04, 2008

The Deception Continues…

Parents Outraged After Islamic Group Gives Classroom Presentation

High school students in a Seminole County public school got a lesson in the indoctrination of Islam. Outraged parents at Lake Brantley High School called Channel 9 after an Islamic group visited the classroom.

Parents say the discussion violated the separation of church and state, because, they said, the discussion expressed the theology of Islam and the Koran. Students in at Lake Brantley High School didn't have a choice about whether they wanted to be involved.

It was just the second day of a new class at Lake Brantley High School called "Family Dynamics," but students said guest speakers were there to talk about something else.

"She said, 'Mom, three Muslim ladies came in and talked about Islam today in school,'" said parent Lisa Wagner. Wagner's daughter was one of about 35 in the class who heard from the Academy for Learning Islam. The school district said it invited the group to talk about cultural diversity, but the conversation went beyond that. "I just felt like it shouldn't have been available in the classroom at all. Religion should be separate from school," Wagner said.

A WFTV reporter Eric Rasmussen asked Regina Klaers with Seminole County Public Schools on Thursday. "Would three nuns be allowed to come into a classroom and talk about Jesus and the Bible?" "If those three nuns came in to talk about how their religion has affected history, yes," she said.

However, district officials admit the in-class discussion at Lake Brantley may have crossed the line. The leader of the Muslim group showed Eyewitness News the presentation students were supposed to see and said his volunteers knew they weren't supposed to talk about religion. "It's not preaching a religion. It's far from it," said Hasnain Kassamali, the Muslim madrassa.

Local activist groups like the United American Committee have also denounced the presentation. District officials said the three presenters were last minute subs for a different woman who was supposed to speak and now they're reviewing their guest speaker program to make sure they know exactly who's involved.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is not enough that Muslims have their own private schools of hate and sedition as well as deceptively starting Islamic public American taxpayer schools right under our noses, but they are using the Islamic deception of “Taqiyyah” to infiltrate existing public and private schools all over America. This is just one small example…

de Andréa

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

America’s First Muslim President

If a Muslim became president of the United States, what would be one of the first orders of business? You are right my friend, he would disarm the country. Another would of course be to stop the war against Islam…

By de Andréa

America, the next Islamic Nation might be closer than you think. If Barack Hussein Obama is not a Muslim, then he is at least a very bizarre Christian, or maybe simply insane.

Sen. Barack Hussein Obama (M-Ill.) is facing no criticism regarding his national security policies of disarming America as he continues his campaign for president In a YouTube video (Watch Video) Obama made for a liberal pacifist organization, the senator called for major cuts in defense spending, slowing the development of future combat systems, and all but scraping America's ballistic missile defense program.

(During the writing of this article, the Obama camp had the video removed from YouTube)

Conservatives have expressed surprise at the degree of Obama's proposals on the video, and even Sen. Hillary Clinton's (D-N.Y.) campaign released an ad criticizing Obama's alleged national security inexperience and trumpeting her as the person who could deftly manage emergency global crises.

In his video, Obama repeats his support for ending the Iraq War, and saying, "I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. (meaning military spending) I will cut the nuclear missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will cut our development of future combat systems. ...

"I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons," Obama says in the video. "To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons. I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material, and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals,” this from a man who would be President of the United States of America in the middle of a war for our very survival.

The video is posted on the official "Obama '08" campaign's YouTube channel but not in the Web site's video section. The "Obama '08" channel labels the video "Obama-Caucus4Priorities."

Defense cuts, also called Caucus for Priorities, was a campaign of Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities (BLSP), which is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. It describes its mission as follows: "To change US budget priorities to reflect a national commitment to education, healthcare, energy independence, job training and deficit reduction - at no additional taxpayer expense - by eliminating funding for unneeded

Cold War era weapons systems.

" The BLSP advocates reducing America's stockpile of nuclear weapons to less than 1,000 warheads; reducing the National Missile Defense program to a basic research program; cutting spending on platforms like the F-22 Raptor, the Virginia-class Submarine, the V-22 Osprey airplane/helicopter hybrid, the DDG-1000 destroyer, and the Army's Future Combat System. Also, the group advocates reducing America's force structure by eliminating two Air Force fighter wings and one aircraft carrier battle-group. In other words, disarm America…

The $60 billion that could conceivably be reused as a result of BLSP's proposed cuts would then be diverted into other initiatives, according to a proposal on the group's website, such as children's health programs, modernizing schools, alternative energy research, budget deficit reduction, veterans' health care, and to "alleviate the global challenges of poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, disease, and disaster."

Conservative criticism

In an interview with Cybercast News Service, Baker Spring, a national security research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, Spring said Obama's proposed cuts in missile defense spending would be "a profoundly destabilizing decision [which] basically says that any state - or, for that matter, non-state actor - that wants to attack the United States, he gets the free first shot, including with weapons of mass destruction."

Obama’s Experience or the lack thereof.

Even if Obama isn’t a Muslim with the agenda of making America the next Islamic State, just how much federal government experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual work days? Answer: Not much.

From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Federal Government. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.

After 143 days of experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, of the United States of America, the Leader of the Free World, and follow the foot steps of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan who was at least governor of a State.

143 days -- I can sometimes keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.
In contrast to Barack Obama, John McCain's 26 years in Congress, 22 years of military service including 1,966 days in captivity as a POW in Hanoi now seem more impressive to me than ever. At 71, John McCain may just be hitting his stride.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This alarming candidate Barack Obama, is at least reminiscent of another tyrant with similar goals named Adolf Hitler who also wanted to disarm the world. This was of course so that he too could bring about his brand of the Islamic agenda of a one world utopian government. Some how back then we were able to discern that this was probably not a good thing for the future ideology of a free people. Watch Video by David Horowitz

But today we face an enemy that is not mighty in brawn but nevertheless mighty in ways we have never encountered before, using an ancient form of deception for which we have no defense. And now a man is running for president of this country, who may be masquerading as a Christian American, looking more to me like the enemy of America; and is saying that he is going to stop fighting the worst enemy the world has ever known and disarm this country. God please help us…