Saturday, August 30, 2008

McCain-Palin


There is hope for America after all...

By de Andréa


I have been following Sarah’s career since she became governor of Alaska close to two years ago. I became aware of her when she convinced the state of Alaska that the Second Amendment was actually part of the bill of rights and abolished most of the anti gun laws. Now, as in the State of Vermont for example, one can actually bear arms in Alaska with out having to get permission from the Gestapo. Now that’s progressive, the socialist Democrat party who call themselves progressives, just don’t know the meaning of the word. This choice for VP by McCain is bold and progressive because it is a step in the right direction, a return toward the basic core values that made America Great.

As for the panic-stricken Liberals regarding her inexperience: With the exception of McCain’s Military leadership, Palin actually has more leadership experience than all of the other three candidates. Sarah Palin’s leadership qualities began to surface when she was in college, she was chair of this, and president of that, not to mention that she is better looking than Joe Biden. She was runner up in a beauty pageant, that’s one up on Joe. After marriage and having children she became a member of her children’s school PTA. Her taste for politics began to show when she became chair of the PTA (a leadership roll). Always a political activist she then ran for her town counsel and after winning that, she ran for mayor of the town (a leadership roll) which was the step ladder for the subsequent run for Governor of the State of Alaska (a leadership roll)

Moreover being governor of Alaska she has had to deal with foreign neighbors, Canada on the right and Russia on the left. And she has also been in Iraq and fired an M16. This is one tuff lady.
Sarah Palin did all this by butting heads with the status quo. She reformed the Republican Party in her state by throwing out all the corrupt people in the State Government.
As I said, with the exception of McCain and his Military leadership, the toughest decision a senator has to make is whether to vote for something or not.

She has as much experience in leadership and government as Ronald Reagan and he brought an end to the cold war with the liberals kicking and screaming behind him. .
Pro-family advocates and Republicans are saying that John McCain may have checkmated Democrat Sen. Barack Hussein Obama with his choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate.

She's a woman, young, and did I mention that she is good looking, she has been governor of Alaska for about two years, is pro-life and doesn't believe homosexuals should be granted the special privilege of "marriage" rights, is a mother, has a son in the on his way to Iraq and wants to expand America's energy production. She wants to drill, drill, drill.

The excitement was palpable among conservative leaders when they heard that Gov. Palin was Sen. McCain's choice for vice president. There is a high level of optimism among conservative leaders that the McCain-Palin combination is a ticket that will connect with the values of American conservative voters.

In her first appearance with McCain, Palin credited Hillary Clinton for leaving behind 18 million cracks, representing 18 million voters who supported her, in the glass ceiling between women and the American presidency, but she also said American women are not finished.

Gov. Palin can work with both parties and has shown she can clean up government corruption. "She is unapologetically pro-life and pro-marriage. Those are values which are shared by the vast majority of mainstream Americans. Gov. Palin has called abortion an 'atrocity,' and she helped Alaska pass the nation's very first marriage amendment in 1998, eight years before she was governor. She is also a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association, who in July organized a meeting of 100 nationally prominent social conservative leaders in Denver to emphasize shared core values. I believe Gov. Palin will electrify conservatives.

When almost 90 percent of all Down's Syndrome babies are aborted, Gov. Palin proudly gave birth to her son Trig last spring, even after he was diagnosed with Down's Syndrome during her pregnancy. The contrast with Sen. Obama could not be greater.

"While Sen. Obama believes that unwanted babies should be murdered, Gov. Palin has shown by her example that all pre-born babies, even those with birth defects, deserve a life like anyone else.

A dedicated family woman and a mother of five, including a son serving our country now, Palin represents Americas original core values and well understands the challenges American families face. Watch videos . Read an interview of Palin by News Max

Go Sarah…
de Andréa

Friday, August 29, 2008

Is Obama even an American Citizen?


Not according to Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania.

By de Andréa

Smoke gets in your eyes
If Philip Berg is correct, and Barack Hussein Obama, who’s sorted past is full of more questions than answers, may not even be eligible to run for president of the United States, or in Obama’s case Messiah of the Western world.

Philip J. Berg, a former member of Pennsylvania's Democratic State Committee and former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, has filed suit in U.S. District court against Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee, and the Federal Election Commission, claiming that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and, therefore, is not eligible to be president of the United States.

In a separate motion filed, he seeks a temporary restraining order on Obama's presidential campaign until Obama's eligibility can be verified.

The lawsuit claims Barack Obama's eligibility is questionable on several grounds, including the allegation that he was born in Kenya to parents unable to automatically grant him American citizenship, moreover, that his Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery and that he was made a citizen of Indonesia as a child and that he retained foreign citizenship into adulthood without recording an oath of allegiance to regain any theoretical American citizenship.

In short, the suit claims Obama was not born an American citizen; and has lost any hypothetical American citizenship that he had as a child; and that may not now be an American citizen and even if he is, may hold dual citizenships with other countries. If any, much less all, of these allegations are true, the suit claims, Obama cannot constitutionally serve as president.

Berg explained in a radio interview with Roger Hedgecock of KOGO in San Diego Ca, that Internet reports had been persistent over the last several months that Obama's birth certificate was a forgery and that he may not be an eligible, natural-born citizen. After doing his own careful research, Berg explained, he came to the conclusion the reports were more fact than rumor and that he needed to act quickly, before the election process proceeded.


FactCheck.org, says it obtained Obama's actual birth certificate and that the document was indeed real. The site discredited some of the claims of Internet bloggers, such as that the certificate as viewed in a scanned copy released by Obama's campaign lacked a raised seal. FactChecke.org also established that many of the alleged flaws in the document noted by bloggers were caused by the scanning of the document.

Real or not, the question is: Was he born in the United States or Kenya?

The Berg lawsuit contends there is enough truth in the various reports to conclude, that, Obama may not be a 'natural born citizen’, which is required by Constitution law. Article II Section I Paragraph V of the U.S. Constitution.

The suit alleges that while records exist of a "registry of birth" for Obama in Hawaii, it was filed at least four days after his claimed birthday or it could have been up to two weeks later, who would know. Moreover, no records exist of his mother's stay in any Hawaiian hospital, this suggesting she may have given birth elsewhere and filed the registration shortly thereafter on American soil.

The suit states, "Obama's grandmother on his father's side, half brother, and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya. Reports reflect Obama's mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; and was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy, which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight. Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and registered Obama's birth."

Even if Obama produced an authenticated proof of his birth in Hawaii, the suit claims that the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 provided that minors lose their American citizenship when their parents expatriate. Since Obama's mother married an Indonesian citizen and moved to Indonesia, the suit claims, she forfeited both her and Barack's American citizenship, moreover, that this is why Obama had Indonesian citizenship and an Indonesian passport.

Even after her divorce and return to the U.S., the suit says, "Obama's mother failed to take the oath in order to regain her U.S. Citizenship. Therefore, Obama would not have been able to regain his U.S. Citizenship until he turned 18 years (and then only) after he took the oath of allegiance himself."

The suit also states, …"Since the oath of allegiance would have been entered in the records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney General, if Plaintiff is incorrect, then Obama should be able to produce in Court a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath administered."

The lawsuit then claims an investigation has shown that in 1981, "Obama traveled to Pakistan using his Indonesian passport. At the time of travels to Indonesia, Obama was 20 years old. He was well aware he maintained his Indonesia citizenship, and failed to regain his United States citizenship. Even if Obama maintained his United States Citizenship, which he failed to do, he also carries citizenships in Kenya and Indonesia. Obama has divided loyalties with foreign countries. Thus, Obama carries multiple citizenships and is ineligible to run for President of the United States."

Pakistan in 1981 was under military rule and it was difficult for U.S. citizens to travel to the country without assistance – meaning, it would have been easier to enter Pakistan on an Indonesian passport.

Berg claims his lawsuit is necessary, not only to protect the Constitution, but also to protect the integrity of the Democratic Party. "If the DNC officers and/or leaders had performed one ounce of due diligence, we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship," said Berg in his press release. "The injunctive relief must be granted because failing to do so, (the DNC's) inaction defrauds everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Even if none of this is true, and Obama is in fact a legitimate citizen of these United States of America, shouldn’t this smoke and mirrors over his questionable background, and his connection to known Islamic terrorists, his loyalties, and ignorance of government be enough to give him the boot?

Remember: as Smokey Bear says “only you; can prevent forest fires”…that is, if you already don’t have too much smoke in your eyes…

Act for America
Do yourself and your family a favor, educate yourselves about Islam and the Constitution… The quickest and least expensive way to get started is by doing this; buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam or telling the truth, and who has devoted her life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to the cultural and subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon. She writes her riveting story in a book called “Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17 and living in a hole in the ground in the war zone of violent Islamic terror. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her family because Brigitte and her parents were Christians and this was, after all, the Jihad of Islam and they were the Kaffaar...

Her latest book “They Must Be Stopped” subtitled Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, will open your eyes to the true agenda of all Muslims.

The following chapter titles will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? Get started by Joining Brigitte and me, and join Act for America click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen in here you say? Think again, it has already happened in America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law, Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain is becoming The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative is to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three choices: One, covert to Islam, and two, become a Slave of Islam, or three, death. I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice. And that is the choice to fight back…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the Forth Choice…

Watch a vidio of what Obama says about the Bible, the book he claims to believe in... Click here

Remember: These Red White and Blue Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Free Speech or Sharia Law


A vote for Intolerance

The bondage of “Islamic Sharia law” has been the norm for most of western Europe for years, but now, as I have so often predicted it has not only come to the United Kingdom and the United Nations, but to the United States.

de Andréa
August 18, 2008

In case you might sometimes wonder why you don’t read or hear much of anything negative or defaming about Islam in the American mainstream media, then the following article written by Mick Hume of the Times On line is a must read.

According to blogger Leslie Sacks, “The Human Rights Council at the United Nations has now banned any criticism regarding Sharia Law and human rights in the Islamic World.
President Doru Romulus Costea –following the efforts of delegates from Egypt, Pakistan and Iran – the Council will no longer tolerate criticism of either Sharia or specific fatwa’s in the name of “human rights.”

Earlier this year, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) called for aggressive, worldwide legal actions to stop the “defamation” of Islam. Muslim leaders throughout the world routinely condemn any public critique or criticism of Islam or Mohammed. Who could forget the Muslim riots and murders after the Danish publication of the satirical cartoons of Mohammed?

This is one more front in the cultural jihad being waged against the West and the values of the West. And every time we acquiesce to it or grovel before it we empower it. Just as the appeasement by the Catholic Church of Hitler failed, so appeasement of Islam by the west will fail. We cannot – we must not – surrender our cherished rights, such as the right of free speech, in the face of Islamic intimidation. There is no appeasement or compromise in Islam there is only complete subjugation.

Out of fear of reprisal a book written by an American writer about the true life of Muhammad will not be published. The book that you will not be allowed to read in the late great “free state of America” is “The Jewel of Medina by Sherry Jones”. Because of fear and the political correctness of multiculturalism, Sharia law has surreptitiously come to America.

The sad truth is, this has been going on for years to one degree or another. I can tell you one thing; Islam will not silence me, despite the threats they have made. What Random House is afraid to publish is the truth about Muhammad, and that is the Jewell of Medina is Aisha, the 7 year old child bride of their beloved demonic prophet. If Satan’s children find me, they had better bring an army because they will be met by one. Shame on you Random House…

The Times On line August 12, 2008
A festival of groveling to terrorists

If works of art are withdrawn because of fear of reprisal, we lose the chance for open debate
By Mick Hume
Have you heard about the first novel by a young American woman that has become the “new Satanic Verses”, sparking terrorist attacks on the publishers and riots by Islamic militants that make the protests against Salman Rushdie's book look like an English tea party?

No, you probably won't have, since there is no book for anybody to riot about. The US publishers Random House pulled The Jewel of Medina by Sherry Jones, due out today, on the ground that it “might be offensive to some in the Muslim community” and “could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment”. An executive told the author that they had stopped her racy historical novel about Aisha, young wife of the Prophet Muhammad, out of “fear of a possible terrorist threat from extremist Muslims” and concern for “the safety and security of the Random House building and employees”.

There had been no acts of violence or terrorism, nor even threats or protests. All that happened was that one non-Muslim associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Texas, who was sent a proof copy, apparently cautioned that the book would be seen as “a declaration of war... explosive stuff... a national security issue” and more offensive than The Satanic Verses. There swiftly followed a riot of retreating publishers, and the book was blown out before anybody had the chance to set light to it for the cameras.

It looks like another example of a quiet wave of self-censorship and cultural cowardice sweeping Western art circles. Two years ago, when the Deutsche opera in Berlin scrapped a production of Mozart's Idomeneo for fear that it might offend some Muslims, I described it as “pre-emptive grovelling”. This now appears to be the modus operandi of the transatlantic arts elites.

It has just been reported that the BBC has dropped a big-budget docu-drama, The London Bombers. A team of journalists had spent months researching it in Beeston, Leeds, home of some of the 7/7 terrorists, and a top writer was preparing the final draft, when it was scrapped. The journalists were reportedly told by BBC executives that it was Islamophobic and offensive.
Last year, the New Culture Forum published a survey of similar cases, from the BBC hospital soap Casualty changing Muslim terrorists into animal rights activists, to the Barbican cutting out scenes from Tamburlaine the Great and the “cutting-edge” Royal Court Theatre cancelling an adaptation of Aristophanes' Lysistrata, both for fear that they might offend some Muslims.

The threat to freedom here does not come from a few Islamic radicals, but from the invertebrate liberals of the cultural establishment who have so lost faith in themselves that they will surrender their freedoms before anybody starts a fight. The mere suggestion of causing offence to some mob of imagined stereotypes is enough to have them scurrying for a bomb shelter, their creative imaginations blowing up small protests into the threat of a big culture war. Of course, such pre-emptive grovelling only encourages any zealot with a blog to demand even more censorship.

Who needs book burners if “offensive” books are not allowed to be published in the first place? Why bother to protest against provocative plays if the theatres will turn the lights off for you beforehand? There is no need even for a polite exchange on Points of View if the controversial programmes never get made.

The quality or lack of it in the self-censored works is not the issue here. That associate professor from Texas condemned the novel about Muhammad's wife as “soft porn”. But so what if it was? Free expression should mean freedom for what others see as filth, too. If there are artists childishly causing offence for its own sake, feel free to ignore them, but not to gag them.
Pre-emptive grovelling, encouraged from the top down by our illiberal authorities, is bad for the arts and for society. The arts can only flourish in a climate of cultural anarchy rather than compulsion and conformity. The attempt to limit what can be said must have a chilling effect, encouraging other writers and artists to pull in their horns.

Such self-censorship is also dangerous for those who don't much care about high culture. There is indeed a lesson from the Satanic Verses controversy, but not the one often cited. The dominant response to that clash of cultures was to try to bury it beneath worthy multicultural claptrap about celebrating difference. After more than 15 years of such attempts to suppress honest debate, the tensions festering beneath the surface exploded on the London transport system. As one female Muslim writer critical of the decision not to publish The Jewel of Medina says: “The series of events that torpedoed this novel are a window into how quickly fear stunts intelligent discourse about the Muslim world.”

As an old libertarian of the Left, who has long upheld the Right to Be Offensive, what makes me most angry today is to see fearful self-censorship and pre-emptive grovelling in the name of liberal values. That really is something worth intellectually rioting about.

THE BOTTOM LINE: In his opening statement Mick Hume says: “If works of art are withdrawn because of fear of reprisal, we lose the chance for open debate.” This is a vast understatement. We loose everything, including our self-respect, our culture, and our freedom. As good as this article is, it still falls dangerously short of the big picture that is deceptively unfolding before our blinded eyes and our preoccupied lives.

Do yourself and your family a favor, educate yourselves about Islam… The quickest and least expensive way to get started is by doing this; buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam and who has devoted her life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to the cultural and subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon. She writes her riveting story in a book called “Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17 and living in a hole in the ground in the war zone of violent Islamic terror. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her family because Brigitte and her family were Christians and this was, after all, the Jihad of Islam and they were the Kaffaar...

Her latest book “They Must Be Stopped” will open your eyes to the true agenda of all Muslims. The following chapter titles will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? Get started by Joining Brigitte and me, and join Act for America click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know about the Muslim agenda in this country. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen in here you say? Think again, it has already happened in America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law, Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain is becoming The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative is to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three choices: One, covert to Islam, and two, become a Slave of Islam, or three, death. I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice. And that is the choice to fight back…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the Forth Choice…

Remember: These Red, White and blue Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Islamic Infiltration of America


Infiltration, or the surreptitious incremental cultural Islamic jihad of the West, is a culture dying a slow death. Yes a lot like boiling the frog…

The article below by Daniel Pipes illustrates the ever expanding challenge we in the West face in dealing with the threat of Islamic infiltration of our culture and more specifically our schools, our State, local and Federal governments including our intelligence agencies. If our government officials act too aggressive in doing background checks of Muslims who seek positions in our governments, they are met with the predictable cry from the ignorant hate America left and the politically correct Multiculturalists hollering “discrimination” and “Islamophobia.” If they are not aggressive or thorough enough in their background checks, Islamic terrorists slip through and gain the access to indoctrinating our children in schools to the confiscation of classified intelligence information that will compromise critical anti-terrorism investigations – putting this country at greater risk. But the blame for this situation does not lie with informed Americans who are concerned about national security and demand exhaustive background checks of Muslims, moreover, the “victims” are not Muslims who claim they are being discriminated against or treated unfairly.

The blame lies first with those millions of Muslims who are intent on waging subjective jihad against us, whether through violent means or cultural subversion. And secondly with the blind and ignorant Liberal left whose stubborn unwillingness to turn and see this demonic train that is about to run down the culture of a free people. It will eventually result in a violent civil war between the Eastern and Western cultures. .

As we are in a fight for our very survival in America against this Nation if Islam, it would seem logical as we did in WW II to eliminate the threat altogether by not allowing any Muslims into this country and quarantining the remainder. But it is the liberal religion of Politically-correct Multiculturalism that prevents us from doing the inevitable, which is to stereotype all Muslims into the Nation of Islam and defend ourselves against it. This is what must be done if we are to survive. One must ask oneself a question of history; were their any warm fuzzy moderate peaceful Nazis? If you know your history at all, the answer must be an emphatic no! We must take the multicultural blinders off and educate ourselves about the world agenda if Islam and what the driving force is behind it.

Moreover, in the meantime, the victims are the innocent free America loving people, who, every time they have to take off their shoes to go through airport security…who every time they have to pay more for goods and services because of the increased costs due to the threat of terrorism…who every time they fear for the safety of loved ones who are traveling…are starkly reminded of the cost we are paying for this jihadist assault on our safety, security and values.

If this ignorance of Islam’s ultimate agenda of subjugating the world under the bondage of Sharia is allowed to continue in the U.S. as is has in Europe we will truly be faced with what Europe is now faced with and that is something no one in this country has ever known, the inevitable internal war in our streets, and neighborhoods. Internal civil war is among the bloodiest devastating and destructive wars in history.

So let us never forget. We are in this war against the nation of Islam in all its manifestations, because Islamists have declared jihad against us, the unholy war of Islam. They are the aggressors, and we have every right to do what we must to protect and defend ourselves, and to do so without apology.

Thus far, we as the ignorant Europeans, are content to sit in the cool water an blindly enjoy our jobs, cars, homes boats and yes, even our friends and family, while we fail to notice the water getting warmer and warmer until we can no longer defeat the inevitable.

Islam will, and is, boiling the frog of America…

Unless we act now; please take the fourth choice and Act for America now… Find out how by buying Brigitte’s new book (They Must Be Stopped)
And please read Dan Pipes article below...

de Andréa .

The West's Islamist Infiltrators



Aafia Siddiqui, 36, is a Pakistani mother of three, an alumna of MIT, and a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Brandeis University. She is also accused of working for Al-Qaeda and was charged last week in New York City with attempting to kill American soldiers. Her arrest serves to remind how invisibly most Islamist infiltration proceeds. In particular, an estimated forty Al-Qaeda sympathizers or operatives have sought to penetrate U.S. intelligence agencies. Such a well-placed infiltrator can wreck great damage explains a former CIA chief of counterintelligence, Michael Sulick: "In the war on terrorism, intelligence has replaced the Cold War's tanks and fighter planes as the primary weapon against an unseen enemy." Islamist moles, he argues, "could inflict far more damage to national security than Soviet spies," for the U.S. and Soviet Union never actually fought each other, whereas now, "our nation is at war." Here are some American cases of attempted infiltration since 2001 that have been made public:

The Air Force discharged Sadeq Naji Ahmed, a Yemeni immigrant, when his superiors learned of his pro-Al-Qaeda statements. Ahmed subsequently became a baggage screener at Detroit's Metro Airport, which terminated him for hiding his earlier discharge from the Air Force. He was convicted of making false statements and sentenced to eighteen months in jail.

The Chicago Police Department fired Patricia Eng-Hussain just three days into her training on learning that her husband, Mohammad Azam Hussain, was arrested for being an active member of Mohajir Qaumi Movement-Haqiqi (MQM-H), a Pakistani terrorist group.

The Chicago Police Department also fired Arif Sulejmanovski, a supervising janitor at its 25th District station after it learned his name was on a federal terrorist watch list of international terrorism suspects.

Mohammad Alavi, an engineer at the Palo Verde nuclear power plant, was arrested as he arrived on a flight from Iran, accused of taking computer access codes and software to Iran that provide details on the plant's control rooms and plant layout. He subsequently pleaded guilty to transporting stolen property.

Nada Nadim Prouty, a Lebanese immigrant who worked for both the FBI and CIA, pleaded guilty to charges of: fraudulently obtaining U.S. citizenship; accessing a federal computer system to unlawfully query information about her relatives and the terrorist organization Hizballah; and engaging in conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Waheeda Tehseen, a Pakistani immigrant who filled a sensitive toxicologist position with the Environmental Protection Agency, pleaded guilty to fraud and was deported. World Net Daily explains that "investigators suspect espionage is probable, as she produced highly sensitive health-hazard documents for toxic compounds and chemical pesticides. Tehseen also was an expert in parasitology as it relates to public water systems."

Weiss Rasool, 31, a Fairfax County police sergeant and Afghan immigrant, pleaded guilty for checking police databases without authorization, thereby jeopardizing at least one federal terrorism investigation.

Nadire P. Zenelaj, 32, a 911 emergency operator of Albanian origins, was charged with 232 felony counts of computer trespass for illegally searching New York State databases, including at least one person on the FBI's terrorist watch list.

Three other cases are less clear. The Transportation Security Administration fired Bassam Khalaf, 21, a Texan of Christian Palestinian origins, as an airport baggage screener because lyrics on his music CD, Terror Alert, applaud the 9/11 attacks. FBI Special Agent Gamal Abdel-Hafiz "showed a pattern of pro-Islamist behavior," according to author Paul Sperry, that may have helped acquit Sami Al-Arian of terrorism charges. The Pentagon cleared Hesham Islam, an Egyptian immigrant, former U.S. Navy commander, and special assistant to the deputy secretary of defense, but major questions remain about his biography and his outlook. Other Western countries too - Australia, Canada, Israel, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom - have been subject to infiltration efforts. (For details, see my weblog entry, "Islamists Penetrate Western Security.") This record prompts one to wonder what catastrophe must occur before government agencies, some of which have banished the words "Islam" and "jihad," seriously confront their internal threat? Westerners are indebted to Arab agents like Fred Ghussin and "Kamil Pasha" who have been critical to fighting terrorism. That said, I stand by my 2003 statement that "There is no escaping the unfortunate fact that Muslim government employees in law enforcement, the military and the diplomatic corps need to be watched for connections to terrorism."

THE BOTTOM LINE: The sad reality here is that we fail to recognize that just as in the 19 40’s when we were at war with Nazism, the Nazi’s we were at war with then, were all Nazis, the war we are in now with Islam are all Muslims. As long as we are deceived into believing that some Muslims are warm and fuzzy and are our friends, we will continue this blind deception, and ignore the train that is about to hit us.

Remember, it is not a matter of if the frog will boil, if he stays in the pot, it is just a matter of time. You might what to wake your frog and get him out of the pot… soon…

Find out how. Get Brigitte Gabriel’s new book —(They Must Be Stopped)

de Andréa

Thursday, August 21, 2008

A letter to the N.Y. Times Magazine Part II


On Wednesday August 20 I wrote a letter to the New York Times, regarding an editorial they published in their Magazine of an Interview with Brigitte Gabriel (Click Here to read that letter)

The following is their response to that letter

From: Public/NYT/NYTIMES
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:55 AM
To: de Andrea
Subject: 8/21 OPE Response to: Brigitte Gabriel interview


Dear de Andrea,

Thank you for writing. Mr. Hoyt has addressed this issue on his Web Journal, pasted below.

http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/21/a-radical-islamophobe/

Sincerely,
Michael McElroy
Office of the Public Editor
The New York Times
Note: The public editor's opinions are his own and do not represent those of The New York Times.

Click on the highlighted URL address above to read the published response written by Clark Hoyt of the N.Y. Times.

The following is my response to the article written by Clark Hoyt.

To The New York Times
New York N.Y.
Re: Article... A Radical Islamophobe
By Clark Hoyt
August 21, 2008 2:12 pm

Dear Public editor, and Mr. Hoyt,

Thank you for your response:

The problem here is not that you aren't certainly entitled to your opinion as am I, but that you are ignorantly writing your opinion on a subject that you know nothing about. When I first started writing, my mentor said to me, write about subjects you know. I have been a student of Middle Eastern studies for over 20 years and specifically the demonic religious theocracy of Islam that has been revived since the petrodollars have been pouring into the Middle Eastern region. (911) was just an example of that revival.

The following is a quote from your editorial August 21, 2008, 2:12 pm A Radical Islamophobe? By Clark Hoyt, "Stephen Lee, the publicist at St. Martins Press for Gabriel's new book, calls her views "extreme," and I wouldn't argue with that". No... Of course you wouldn't argue with that, because neither Stephen lee nor you even have a clue of what the Nation of Islam is, or what its agenda has been for nearly 1400 years, so how could you possibly know what the measurement of extreme is.

You see in the 1930's, despite the "extreme" warnings of Sir Winston Churchill no one in this country read Mien Kampf either. If it was a matter of interest then, we would have been able to avoid the war in Europe in the 1940's. I suggest that you educate yourselves by reading the Quran. You will discover what Brigitte Gabriel has learned first hand the hard way. Trust me, you will learn... either from history or the hard way as Brigitte did as a child.

By the way, do you know what Mine Kampf means in English? It means My Struggle... Now; do you know what Jihad means in English? Not coincidentally my friend, it means, My Struggle... And incidentally the Arabic word Islam in English means Subjugation. And that my ignorant friend is the struggle of Islam. Just as it was the struggle of Hitler's Nazism it is the struggle of Islam to subjugate the world under Sharia, the bondage of Islamic law. Moreover, unless we support someone like Brigitte, instead of the agenda of Islam as you are so eloquently doing with your ignorant op-ed columns. We will have a bloody war; right here in the streets of America just as happened in Lebanon, Indonesia, Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and in any country that Islam has surreptitiously infiltrated and incrementally changed the culture of that country.

If you want to see the historical bloody murdering Crusades of Eastern Europe in the 1190’s repeat itself today in the West, then just remain ignorant and you will be part of the conduit that enables Islam to take America down.

You see, it is not Brigitte that is extreme; it is Islam that is extreme.
And you, my journalistic friend, are blissfully ignorant.

Again, I challenge you to print this letter. Even though I know you won't, because printing the truth just isn't part of your agenda, you consider only the ignorant mantra of the hate America liberal politically correct multicultural left.

Just as Brigitte so eloquently does, I tell the truth, I just don't do it as delicately as she...

de Andréa

Where Have All The WMD’s Gone???

A Former head of Iraqi prisons says incarcerated ex-Saddam forces disclosed move: Iraqis told me WMDs sent to Syria.
By de Andréa

“Bush lied and Americans died.” This was the hate Bush and the hate America rhetoric that the liberal left socialist Dem’s spewed out immediately following the capture of Baghdad at the beginning of the Iraqi war which was code named “Operation Iraqi Freedom” The hate America communists on the left just couldn’t wait to slam Bush for deceiving them about the existence of WMD in Iraq.

(Click Here) To watch a video of government leaders who said we need to stop Saddam Hussein and his WMD’s, some of them even before 911 or the invasion of Iraq.

Shortly after all the smearing of Bush and the CIA, it was discovered that six weeks before the invasion of Iraq, Saddam had moved most of the WMD to Syria and Lebanon. But of course by that time the song that the liberal hate America socialists were singing “Bush lied Americans died” had caught on and had become the gospel according to Ted Kennedy and Harry Reid.

This transport of most of the WMD’s out of Iraq was already known within the few months following the capture of Baghdad. Moreover, several cashes of bio material as well as several tons of yellow cake nuclear material were left behind and found later by marines. Even so because of the hate America alphabet soup media, to this day, most Americans still believe the rhetoric of “Bush lied and Americans died”

A former American overseer of Iraqi prisons says several dozen inmates who were members of Saddam Hussein's military and intelligence forces boasted of helping transport weapons of mass destruction to Syria and Lebanon in the three months prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Don Bordenkircher – who served two years as national director of prison and jail operations in Iraq–said that about 40 prisoners he spoke with "boasted of being involved in the transport of WMD warheads to Syria.

Bordenkircher also was a senior adviser to South Vietnam's correctional system during the war in Southeast Asia from 1967-72. His task was to improve conditions for 80,000 civilian prisoners. The U.S. Department of Justice asked him to play a similar role in Iraq, sending him first to Baghdad's infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad in March 2006 to shut it down. Bordenkircher previously served as Marshall County sheriff of Moundsville, W.Va., and police chief and warden of the state penitentiary at Moundsville.

A smaller number of prisoners, he said, claimed "they knew the locations of the missile hulls buried in Iraq."

Some of the inmates, Bordenkircher said, "wanted to trade their information for a release from prison and were amenable to showing the locations."

The prisoners were members of the Iraqi military or civilians assigned to the Iraqi military, often stationed at munitions facilities, according to Bordenkircher. He said he was told the WMDs were shipped by truck into Syria, and some ended up in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.
GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0200");
Other Iraqi military personnel, including former top Saddam associates, have made the same claim.

In early 2006, Saddam's No. 2 Air Force officer, Georges Sada, told the New York Sun Iraq's WMDs were moved into Syria six weeks before the war started.

World Net Daily reported in 2006 that a former general and friend of Saddam who defected, alleged WMDs were hidden in Syria and said the regime supported al-Qaida with intelligence, finances and munitions. Ali Ibrahim Al-Tikriti, the southern regional commander for Saddam's militia in the late 1980s, said the regime had contingency plans established as far back as the 1980s in the event either Baghdad or Damascus was taken over.

Saddam knew the U.S. eventually would come for the weapons, Al-Tikriti said at the time, and had "wanted since he took power to embarrass the West and this was the perfect opportunity to do so.” So he denied they existed and made sure they were moved into hiding, the former general said.

Among other claims, a former U.S. federal agent and counter-terrorism specialist deployed to Iraq before the war said he waged a three-year, unsuccessful battle to get officials to search four sites where he believed the former Saddam regime buried weapons of mass destruction.

Bordenkircher said four of the Iraqi prisoners who separately offered to speak to the "right" people about Saddam's alleged transport of WMD later became involved with U.S. and Iraqi intelligence agencies.

Some prisoners said the drivers, upon return from transporting the WMDs out of Iraq, discussed the movement. They said, according to Bordenkircher, the materials shipped out would return once Iraq got "a clean bill of health from the U.N., and then the program could be kick-started easily."

Four of the prisoners – civilians attached to the Iraqi military – said they worked at the al-Muthana Chemical Industries site. They said the cargo included nitrogen mustard gas warheads for Tariq I and II missiles. Bordenkircher said the stories of the military personnel and the civilians matched and did not contradict one another. Bordenkircher also said prisoners confirmed al-Qaida had a presence in Iraq before Operation Iraqi Freedom began, specifically in Mosul and Kirkuk.

Iraqis under the command of Uday Hussein, one of Saddam Hussein's sons, said they supported the al-Qaida elements in the country with training and providing safe harbor.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The truth is, that it wasn’t Bush that lied…It was the HATE AMERICA POLITICALLY CORRECT MULTICULTURAL SOCIALIST COMMIE LIB’S THAT LIED. While we are fighting for our very survival in this country, these useless pieces of human feces are committing treason by undermining our effort to save their useless hides. What we should do with these garbage heads is what we are supposed to do with those that commit treason, and take them out behind the barn and put them out of their Hate America misery. There… I feel much better now, how about you…

de Andréa

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

A letter to the N.Y. Times Magazine


The following is a copy of a letter that I sent to the New York Times in response to an article regarding an interview of Brigitte Gabriel by a New York Times Magazine reporter Deborah Solomon


By de Andréa
August 20, 2008

Dear Corrections editor and Public editor
New York Times Magazine
New York NY

Re: Interview of Brigitte Gabriel
By Reporter Deborah Solomon

This past Sunday the New York Times magazine carried an interview with Brigitte Gabriel in advance of the release of her new book "They Must Be Stopped". In what one can only mildly describe as a remarkable illustration of ignorance and "Political Correctness". Brigitte Gabriel was described as a “radical Islamophobe” in the introduction page 6 Table of Contents blurb. Now if you were describing me, you might be correct, because I don't soft peddle the truth in any way as she does so graciously and diplomatically. This little dynamo of a once Lebanese lady has become more of an American than anyone at the New York Times could ever hope to achieve. You may one day owe your freedom to write this kind of ignorant tripe, to this great American woman. As a matter of fact you would do well to try to hire her as an expert on just who and what Islam really is, because trust me; you… haven't got a clue.

Calling Brigitte a “radical Islamophobe” is tantamount to calling someone who fought against Nazism in 1943, a radical Naziophobe. Thank God there were such people then and you should thank God that we have at least one person leading the fight against Islam now.

I protest reporter Deborah Solomon's obvious ignorant lack of objectivity toward Brigitte, and Solomon's often inappropriate questions, such as "Are you an agent of the U.S. government, and are you underwritten by the CIA"? As well as the dig,"... I see that R. James Woolsey, a former director of the CIA. serves on the board of American Congress for Truth, your educational foundation." The FBI, CIA and the Homeland Security agency's would also do well in trying to hire her as an expert advisor on the coming agenda of Islam before it’s too late. Apparently in Deborah Solomon's world, one must be on the U.S. government payroll to want to sound the alarm about militant Muslim supremacists. Another stunningly absurd question from Solomon: was, "If you are worried about death threats, why would you put a glamorous photograph of yourself on the cover of your new book?"

Presumably Solomon feels that Brigitte Gabriel should wear a burka, or hide altogether, to appease the Islamists who want to kill her for speaking out against them and exposing them for what they are. Moreover why does Solomon feel it is somehow questionable for Brigitte to be "glamorous"? Not to mention giving her the inflammatory title of "The Crusader." Coming from me that would be different, because I know the meaning of the word crusader and I know that she is a crusader trying desperately to save America from the same fate as her birth country Lebanon. However coming from the bowels of ignorance like the New York Times it is tantamount to call her a murderer. Well I have news for you, Brigitte is just trying her very best to save your useless hide from the murdering Muslims that have infiltrated this country just as they infiltrated her birth country Lebanon, and now guess what… Lebanon is an Islamic State. Try reading her first book, "Because they Hate" and educate yourselves just a little as to what Islam is really all about before you shoot yourselves in the foot.

Is this what you really want for America or do you have the guts to print the truth for a change without passing it through the filter of your religion of”Politically Correct Multiculturalism" that does nothing but act as conduit for the Islamic establishment of Sharia law???

If you don't have the guts to publish this letter to the editor, then I can only urge the Times to publish an apology/correction regarding the inaccurate label of "radical Islamophobe" of Brigitte Gabriel. I urge the Times also to remove this inaccurate description of her from your web site.

Yours truly, de Andréa

Friday, August 15, 2008

World War Three???


Not only are we in a Cuban type stand-off with Russia over Georgia but we are now gearing up big time, for a defensive move against the threat of a nuclear Iran.

By de Andréa

Could this trigger WW III???
Read on…

A massive US Naval armada heads for Iran
Following a massive Israeli training mission earlier last month. Last week Operation Brimstone, was the joint US/UK/French naval war games in the Atlantic Ocean, preparing for a naval blockade of Iran and the likely resulting war in the Persian Gulf area. The massive war games included a US Navy Supercarrier Battle Group, an US Navy expeditionary carrier battle group, a Royal Navy carrier battle group, a French nuclear hunter-killer submarine plus a large number of US Navy cruisers, destroyers and frigates playing the "enemy force".

The lead American ship in these war games, the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN71) and its Carrier Strike Group Two (CCSG-2) are now headed towards Iran along with the USS Ronald Reagon (CVN76) and its Carrier Strike Group Seven (CCSG-7) coming from Japan. They are joining two existing USN battle groups in the Gulf area: the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN72) with its Carrier Strike Group Nine (CCSG-9); and the USS Peleliu (LHA-5) with its expeditionary strike group. Also under way towards the Persian Gulf is the USS Iwo Jima (LHD-7) and its expeditionary strike group, the UK Royal Navy HMS Ark Royal (R07) carrier battle group, assorted French naval assets including the nuclear hunter-killer submarine Amethyste and French Naval Rafale fighter jets on-board the USS Theodore Roosevelt. These ships took part in the just completed Operation Brimstone.
  • The build up of naval forces in the Gulf will be one of the largest multi-national naval armadas since the First and Second Gulf Wars. The intent is to create a US/EU naval blockade (which is an Act of War under international law) around Iran (with supporting air and land elements) to prevent the shipment of benzene and certain other refined oil products headed to Iranian ports. Even though Iran pumps its own oil, it has limited domestic oil refining capacity and imports 40% of its benzene. Cutting off benzene and other key products would cripple the Iranian economy.

  • The following are just the US Naval forces being assembled:
You might want to just skim over this list of war machinery printed in Italics, but I wanted to show the enormity if this operation.

Carrier Strike Group Nine:
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN72) nuclear powered supercarrierwith its Carrier Air Wing

TwoDestroyer Squadron Nine:
USS Mobile Bay (CG53) guided missile cruiserUSS Russell (DDG59) guided missile destroyerUSS Momsen (DDG92) guided missile destroyerUSS Shoup (DDG86) guided missile destroyerUSS Ford (FFG54) guided missile frigateUSS Ingraham (FFG61) guided missile frigateUSS Rodney M. Davis (FFG60) guided missile frigateUSS Curts (FFG38) guided missile frigatePlus one or more nuclear hunter-killer submarines

Peleliu Expeditionary Strike Group:
USS Peleliu (LHA-5) a Tarawa-class amphibious assault carrierUSS Pearl Harbor (LSD52) assult shipUSS Dubuque (LPD8) assult ship/landing dockUSS Cape St. George (CG71) guided missile cruiserUSS Halsey (DDG97) guided missile destroyerUSS Benfold (DDG65) guided missile destroyer

Carrier Strike Group Two
USS Theodore Roosevelt (DVN71) nuclear powered supercarrierwith its Carrier Air Wing Eight
Destroyer Squadron 22
USS Monterey (CG61) guided missile cruiserUSS Mason (DDG87) guided missile destroyerUSS Nitze (DDG94) guided missile destroyerUSS Sullivans (DDG68) guided missile destroyerUSS Springfield (SSN761) nuclear powered hunter-killer submarine

Expeditionary Strike Group:
IWO ESG ~ Iwo Jima USS Iwo Jima (LHD7) amphibious assault carrierwith its Amphibious Squadron Fourand with its 26th Marine Expeditionary UnitUSS San Antonio (LPD17) assault shipUSS Velia Gulf (CG72) guided missile cruiserUSS Ramage (DDG61) guided missile destroyerUSS Carter Hall (LSD50) assault shipUSS Roosevelt (DDG80) guided missile destroyerUSS Hartfore (SSN768) nuclear powered hunter-killer submarine

Carrier Strike Group Seven
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN76) nuclear powered supercarrierwith its Carrier Air Wing 14

Destroyer Squadron 7
USS Chancellorsville (CG62) guided missile cruiserUSS Howard (DDG83) guided missile destroyerUSS Gridley (DDG101) guided missile destroyerUSS Decatur (DDG73) guided missile destroyerUSS Thach (FFG43) guided missile frigateUSNS Rainier (T-AOE-7) fast combat support shipUSS San Jacinto (CG56) guided missile cruiserUSS Anzio (CG68) guided missile cruiserUSS Normandy (CG60) guided missile cruiserUSS Carney (DDG64) guided missile destroyerUSS Oscar Austin (DDG79) guided missile destroyerUSS Winston S. Churchill (DDG81) guided missile destroyerUSS Carr (FFG52) guided missile frigate

The USS Iwo Jima and USS Peleliu Expeditionary Strike Groups have USMC Harrier jump jets and an assortment of assault and attack helicopters. The Expeditionary Strike Groups have powerful USMC Expeditionary Units with amphibious armor and ground forces trained for operating in shallow waters and in seizures of land assets, such as Qeshm Island (a 50 mile long island off of Bandar Abbas in the Gulf of Hormuz and headquarters of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps).

Also likely to join the battle armada:UK Royal Navy HMS Ark Royal Carrier Strike Group with assorted guided missile destroyers and frigates, nuclear hunter-killer submarines and support shipsFrench Navy nuclear powered hunter-killer submarines (likely the Amethyste and perhaps others), plus French Naval Rafale fighter jets operating off of the USS Theodore Roosevelt as the French Carrier Charles de Gaulle is in dry dock, and assorted surface warships

This is a big deal Hoss…

The Russian and Chinese equation
The large and very advanced nature of the US Naval warships is not just directed at Iran. There is a great fear that Russia and China may oppose the naval and air/land blockade of Iran. If Russian and perhaps Chinese naval warships escort commercial tankers to Iran in violation of the blockade it could be the most dangerous at-sea confrontation since the Cuban Missile Crisis. The US and allied Navies, by front loading a Naval blockade force with very powerful guided missile warships and strike carriers is attempting to have a force so powerful that Russia and China will not be tempted to mess with it.

The Russian Navy this spring sent a major battle fleet into the Mediterranean headed by the modern aircraft carrier the Admiral Kuznetsov and the flagship of its Black Sea Fleet, the Guided Missile Heavy Cruiser Moskva. This powerful fleet has at least 11 surface ships and unknown numbers of subs and can use the Russian naval facility at Syria's Tartous port for resupply.

A strategic diversion has been created for Russia. The Republic of Georgia, with US backing, has attacked South Ossetia. The South Ossetia capital has been shelled and a large Georgian tank force has been heading towards the border. Russia has stated that it will not sit by and allow the Georgians to attack South Ossetia. Well of course not, Russia wants the oil pipeline.

The Russians are great chess players
War has broken out between Georgia and South Ossetia. Hundreds of Russian troops have been killed and many more wounded and at least 4 Russian fighter jets downed. American Marines, a thousand of them, have recently been in Georgia training the Georgian military forces. Several European nations stopped Bush and others from allowing Georgia into NATO. Russia has moved a large military force with armor towards the area. This could get bad, and remember it is just a strategic diversion....but one that could have horrific effects. Georgia calls for US help; Russian Air Force bombs Georgian air bases. DEBKA, the Israeli strategy and military site, states that Israeli military officers are advising the Georgian armed forces in combat operations and that 1,000 Israelis are in-combat on the side of Georgia at this time.

Kuwait has activated its "Emergency War Plan
Kuwait and other Gulf nations prepare for the likelihood of a major regional war in the Middle East involving weapons of mass destruction.

THE BOTTOM LINE: We knew that it would eventually come, just as we knew that WW II was inevitable. Well freedom isn’t free folks; we must eventually fight for it.

Their will always be those that want to take away something from you because they want more. It is not the freedom they want from you, but the power and control they want for themselves. Whether it is Nazi Germany, Islam, Russia, China, or Venezuela, they don’t want your freedom they want your submission. Nazism, Marxism, and Islamo-fascism all originate in Islam.

They all have the same agenda of total world power, tyrannical control, and dependency. Western Democracy on the other hand wants freedom, peace, and independence. The question for you is; which one do you choose…

For those of you that align yourselves with the Peacenicks and believe that peace can be negotiated, I have bad news for you, it can’t, and it never has. The only lasting peace in all of history has be when someone wins and someone losses a war.

Iran is heading like a runaway train toward nuclear capability
Unless we turn ourselves around soon to see the train that is about to hit us, these Satan driven Muslims will soon test their nuclear tipped missiles on Israel Europe and The U.S.
Bear in mind Islam cares nothing about the threat of retaliation as the USSR did all during the cold war.

According to Israel's deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz warned Friday, Iran is heading towards the grand finally in its nuclear weapons capability.

"Iran is continuing to advance toward a military nuclear capability and is heading towards a major breakthrough," the Iranian-born Mofaz told a think tank after talks in Washington Friday with US officials. "For us such a situation that Iran will have a nuclear power is an existential threat and from the state of Israel’s point of view, it is unacceptable," Mofaz told the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

"Our estimation is that already by the end of the year Iran will reach uranium enrichment capability and as soon as the end of 2009 will have option to reach (uranium production) at military levels," he said in broken English.

He charged that Iran was playing for time in talks aimed at halting uranium enrichment with the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain -- the permanent UN Security Council members -- and Germany, the so-called P5-plus-1. "One thing is clear, Iranians are continuing their policy of buying time, and so far they are succeeding," he said.

"We all know time is a decisive element in our ability to change the picture and remove the Iranian threat," Mofaz said. "And the window of influence is becoming smaller and I believe about to close," he said. "It's a race against time and time is winning."

Are you sure that you want Obama at the controls in 2009? He has already said that there will be no new weapons programs for the U.S. military as well as scraping our nuclear program.

If it talks like a duck…well in this case a Muslim…

de Andréa

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Pope Benedict Visits Islamic Arabia

Is the Pope’s last name Arnold? If not what can he hope to gain by breaking bread with the Devil?

By de Andréa

The mere idea seems bazaar:
Pope Benedict XVI would be the first modern-day pontiff to set foot on the Wahhabist Arabian Peninsula.

But what does he hope to gain by such a visit? Speculation about the possibility has been growing since Bahrain’s King Hamad invited the Holy Father to visit his country earlier this month. The king is the first Arab head of state to officially invite the Pope for a private audience and comes after Qatar’s deputy prime minister made a similar invitation last year.

This seems reminiscent of a part of history where the Pope was invited to bow down to Nazism.
Read the Article

Both gestures reveal an interesting phenomenon that’s taking place in the region: a growth in the number of Christians living there and the consequential pressure their presence is putting on Arab rulers to accommodate them. Bahrain, like most Arabian countries, has a large immigrant population. Foreign slaves now represent 35 percent of the kingdom’s inhabitants, while the number is 80 percent in the United Arab Emirates, and 60 percent in Kuwait.

Indeed, of the Arab Peninsula’s 35 million people, as many as 40 percent are foreign citizens. A large number are Christians or non-Muslims from Asia and, of them, a significant proportion hail from traditionally Christian areas like the Philippines and southern India.

Statistically, Christians now constitute roughly 9 percent of Bahrain's population of 720,000 people. In Saudi Arabia, the Catholic Church estimates there are as many as 1.2 million Filipino Catholics, up from 800,000 in 2005, making them the largest immigrant group behind Indians and Bangladeshis.

The Gulf’s rapid economic growth has been built largely on the backs of immigrant Infidel slaves as well as the Petro dollars from the west, and so to a large extent, future growth depends on the well-being of their infidel slaves.

This factor indirectly prompted Bahrain to deceivingly send a Jewish diplomat to be its representative to the United States. Meanwhile, Qatar’s first Catholic Church opened in March of 2008. According to Bishop Paul Hinder, the Pope’s Abu-Dhabi-based representative to Arabia, governments in the Gulf are “competing” with each other when it comes to the deception of the interfaith dialogue initiatives.

There are just 20 Catholic parishes in the region, run by teams of priests, mostly Capuchin friars, who are in charge of caring for hundreds of thousands of Catholics in a single parish because of course the Islamic government won’t allow more churches to be built.

The Church is meekly applying gentle pressure on the monarchs to grant more permissions, but it is also pressing for other concerns to be addressed.

In particular, it wants better treatment for its flock. The majority of immigrants are unskilled or blue-collar workers earning less than $10 a day in a very wealthy region.
Millions of them live in squalid labor camps and, in the worst cases, live lives of modern-day slavery or indentured labor, typical of the “Dhimmitude Slavery of Infidels.” Housemaids, most of whom are Filipino Catholic, are at particular risk, with thousands subject to abuse, virtually imprisoned by their employers, given no rights whatsoever and unable to worship freely. Moreover, the almost all non-Muslim religion in the Gulf feels insecure and at times they fear for their safety. Many have just disappeared and are feared dead

Could all these problems be addressed and possibly resolved by a papal visit, as well as offering a forum to interreligious dialogue? Just how much is the Pope willing to compromise with the devil?

Another factor supporting the Pope’s visit to Arabia is the current reformist talk in the House of Saud. It seems as though King Abdullah is trying to reach out to other faiths and engage with modernity. In June, he brought various heads of Islam to Mecca to discuss how to best dialogue with Infidels. And in mid July, he became the first ever Saudi Monarch to host a major interfaith meeting, bringing together senior figures not only from Islam and Christianity, but also Judaism. What a tangled web they weave…

These landmark meetings come on top of his meeting with Pope Benedict last year in Rome. Although he cannot say it openly owing to the presence of so-called Muslim Extremists in his own government, few doubt the king would welcome a visit by the Holy Father. Is the King really a Muslim, and exercising the doctrine of Taqiyyah (the Islamic deception? Is the Pope really a Catholic?

The real obstacles to a papal visit are threefold.
First, Muslims will obviously oppose it. Much, therefore, depends on initiatives of King Abdullah and other Arab leaders to placate or control the vocal grumblings.

Second, for the Pope, the problem is one of protocol – which States should he visit? Could he, for instance, visit the region without calling in on Saudi Arabia? “I am more than happy if one day the visit is possible,” said Bishop Hinder. “But I think it will take some time because of the many involved questions”.

And third, just how shroud is the Pope, or will he follow the Papal mistakes of history and fall into the same deception of Eve in Eden and embrace the personified god of Hell.

If it did happen, Benedict XVI wouldn’t be the first Pope to travel to the region: Pope Shenouda III, head of the Egyptian Coptic Church, visited the U.A.E. last year to open a new Coptic church in Abu Dhabi. A visit by the successor of Peter, however, would garner much more attention.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I would be remiss if I didn’t compare this hob knobbing with the Wahhabist Evil Islamic Empire to the Concordat between the Vatican and the Nazi Empire

(The Nazis were just a spin off of Islam with the same agenda.).Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) signs the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican at a formal ceremony in Rome on 20 July 1933. Nazi Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen sits at the left, Pacelli in the middle, and the Rudolf Buttmann sits at the right.The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler and the Nazi Regime in the eyes of Catholicism, and the world.

Will Pope Benedict follow suit and enter into a covenant with the Muslim leaders of Mecca and legitimize the Satanic Nation of Islam?

May God be with us…

de Andréa

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

U.S. State Dept. Supports Terrorism


Our resident undersecretary of state Karen Hughes gives your money to the bad guys

By de Andrae
August 12, 2008

A respected U.S. terrorism expert by the name of Steven Emerson told Congress last week, that a longtime adviser and close confidant of President Bush Ms. Karen Hughes funneled millions of dollars in U.S. government grants to radical Islamist organizations, many of whose leaders have been convicted or indicted in terrorism cases in the United States.

Emerson told the House International Relations Committee. “When Ms. Karen Hughes was appointed as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, she set the tone for a disastrous policy of outreach with Islamist partners.”
Doesn't anyone in this administration know that we are as war with Islam, apparently not. This is tantamount to supporting Nazism while we were at war with Nazi Germany.

Among the recipients of the State Department grants actively championed by Hughes was Ahmed Younes, a former official with the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), a group that has “publicly challenged the designation of Hezbollah and Hamas as terrorist organizations” and whose leaders “have made extreme statements defending terrorist organizations.”

Another beneficiary of Hughes’ outreach program to American terrorists Muslims was Aly Abuzaakouk, the executive director of the American Muslim Council (AMC) and a former director of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIHT).

The North Virginia-based IIHT “is suspected of being a pivotal cog in the Muslim Brotherhood’s high command in America," according to federal law enforcement records newly released to Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism under the Freedom of Information Act.

Since 2004, The State Department has provided $340,000 in taxpayer dollars to the Palestinian American Research Center (PARC), co-chaired by Columbia University professor Rashid Khalili, who served as a spokesman for late Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat at a time when the PLO was considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.
In addition to the grants to known Islamist organizations, Hughes brought Islamist leaders to Washington, D.C., and personally attended conferences held by anti-American organizations. The outreach policy championed by Hughes “legitimizes Islamism to the world and sends mixed messages to our allies,” while “sending a terrible message to moderate Muslims who are thoroughly disenfranchised by the funding,” said Emerson.

Citing earlier warnings by Emerson and other experts, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., wrote to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on July 10, demanding that she instruct the State Department to cancel all outstanding grants to known terrorists Islamist groups.

When Coburn learned last year that the State Department was funding terrorists Islamist entities, he requested a meeting with Goli Ameri, who at the time was the nominee to become the assistant secretary of state for educational and cultural affairs, the bureau that issues and manages the grants.

“During the discussion of her nomination,” the senators wrote, “Ms. Ameri promised Senator Coburn that the State Department would stop funding these entities once she was confirmed.” And yet, shortly after Ameri was confirmed, one of the groups cited by the senators and by Emerson for its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood announced that it had just received fresh funding from the State Departtment office that was now under Ameri’s control.

The new funding was awarded as a subgrant to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), “a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organization, [which] was an unindicted co-conspirator in last year’s terrorist financing trial against the Holy Land Foundation,"

Despite ISNA’s known ties to terrorist-related entities, Hughes attended the group’s 2005 national conference in Chicago, and “held private meetings with organization leaders and delegates, including representatives of the Muslim Students Association,” another “Muslim Brotherhood-linked group,”

A number of groups that the State Department has funded or collaborated with are well connected to entities such as al-Qaida, Hamas and Hezbollah, all of which are designated as terrorist organizations by the United States government, Emerson revealed in his testimony.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The burning question is: Why does the State Department spend U.S. taxpayer dollars to support our enemy the Islamic terrorists who actively oppose the foreign policy goals of the United States and subscribe to a supremacist, oppressive ideology?” Answer because our Government Administration is in blind subjugation to the Islamic deception of Taqiyyah. Moreover if something or someone doesn’t awake this sleeping giant soon, we will all need to invest in a prayer rug and study Sharia law.

May God have mercy on us and protect us from this murderous evil World Nation of Islam. May God Bless and protect America…
de Andréa

Monday, August 11, 2008

TV Reality Show Says Christians Just have a Code...


New TV: Lesbian, atheist, Muslim all attempt Christian lifeReality program follows people for 3 weeks of holy reformation


The following article was posted: August 10, 2008 by WorldNetDaily It begins:
A new television program broadcast this month follows a group of 13 non-Christian volunteers, who, on camera, attempt to "live by the teachings of the Bible for three weeks."

"Make Me a Christian," broadcast in a three-part series, asks the participants to be mentored by four pastors from a variety of backgrounds – Anglican,
Catholic, Evangelical, and Pentecostal – as they attempt to live like Christians, an effort that runs in stark contrast to many of the participants' backgrounds.”. To read the remainder of the article, click on this…
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=72017

I have never heard such trash
The first and obvious light that went on in my itchy brain was the use of the title,”Make Me a Christian”... Whoever is at the helm of this derelict ship has absolutely no knowledge of Christianity, or Islam either for that matter. And why any Christian pastor would involve him or herself in this kind of ignorant heresy is a mystery.

Make Me a Christian” suggests that to become a Christian is a simple matter of changing one’s clothes, and being forced or as the title says, made to do it as well. It sounds more like a dare than a choice to spiritual commitment. While one can certainly be indoctrinated or brainwashed into going through the motions of a Christian or a Muslim, this certainly does not a Christian make.

This endeavor is not only fool hardy but dangerous as well, because no matter what the perceived outcome is, it will give rise to even more misunderstanding and deception as to what Christianity as well as Islam really is.

The WND article goes on to say: "According to the C4 website, the first episode sends the participants to York Minster, "an awe-inspiring cathedral that's almost 1,000 years old, where they are asked to participate in a communion service." After that, the four mentors – Pentecostal minister and leader of the Scottish Christian Party Rev. George Hargreaves, Church of England Curate the Rev. Joanna Jepson, Catholic Fr. John Flynn, and the World Harvest Christian Centre's Pastor Wale Babatunde – visit the volunteers in their homes and make specific recommendations on how to conform to a Christian code of conduct".

…”they are asked to participate in a communion service”.
If this isn’t putting the cart in front of the proverbial horse then I don’t know my Bible. This further proves what I said at the opening, these so-called Christian Pastors are the most ignorant people, Christian or not that I have ever encountered.

Jesus celebrated the last supper with his faithful and committed followers. Today spiritually born again Christians all over this planet partake of the bread a wine as a symbol of the broken body and the blood He shed for our sins. This doctrinally means that one must not only be a Christian to participate in communion, but one must have examined oneself closely at the time of participation as to one’s personal relationship with Jesus at that time. Put another way do you have any un-forgiven sin?

THE BOTTOM LINE: The article clearly states that at York Minister a 1000 year old cathedral the participants were asked to commit sin by participating in a sacred ceremony that is specifically for Christians only, and then it says they were visited in their respective homes to show them how to conform to a Christian code of conduct ??? What Christian code of conduct??? One does not become a Christian by being good or adhering to a code. One does acknowledge ones sin and the price or payment paid through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I doubt that Allah himself would dare to vomit up this much heretical blasphemy about what is takes to become a Christian, and this is coming from a group passing themselves off as Christian Pastors. May God have Mercy on their tragically lost souls.

de Andréa

Thanks to WorldNetDaily for posting this article…

Friday, August 08, 2008

A Democratic Iraq?


In case anyone is still ignorant enough to believe that any Islamic Nation can ever be fundamentally democratic you must take a closer look at Iraq.
By de Andréa

Iraq had a considerable Christian population for over two thousand years; that is until about the last five hundred years or so. Today only a handful of Christians are left in Iraq. Nearly all remaining Christians have left or been murdered; only those that are too old, too young, or too poor, remain.

According to the last Christian pastor left in Iraq, Christians were much better off under the regime of Sadam Hussein, not because the Muslims were more warm and fuzzy then, but because Iraq was a police state, and in a police state only police are allowed to torture rape and murder.

In a democracy the majority rules, and since the majority is now Islam… then Islam rules… Moreover according to Islamic Sharia law, Christians must convert to Islam, become slaves or be killed. This is Islamic democracy. Freedom is not part of the equation

The foundation of freedom is equality and since Muslims consider themselves superior to everyone else, freedom can never be a part of Islam. Therefore democracy as you and I have come to know it will never be a part of a Muslim Iraq.

Most Iraqi Christians have been murdered or have fled to Kurdistan or Syria to live underground. Those that are left are a few orphan children and some old women. All the Churches have been destroyed or abandon. The few that are left, meet each week in a different secret place.

I tell this story, not because it is so unique to Iraq but because it is not unique. This same story has eventually become the history of every country in the world that has benevolently allowed Muslims to become a part of their culture.

Iraq is not the only nation that once had a substantial Christian population and was eventually destroyed by Muslims; it is just the most resent. The country before Iraq was Lebanon; a Christian democracy until the 1970’s and after 10 torturous and murderous years by the mid 80’s it was an Islmic Nation. Indonesia is another example of a Christian Nation being incrementally taken over by Islam

Today most of Europe has been infiltrated by Islam; it is just a matter of time before it too will be dominated by Islamic Sharia Law. The Church of England has already given in to the oppression of Sharia. Parisian women dare not be seen on the street without a Hijaab. (a head covering)

Oh no, the U.S. is not exempt from this agenda of Islam, no one is. In our military, Sharia now trumps military protocol. In the Pentagon a Muslim employee has successfully had an American patriot fired. In many American schools and colleges Sharia law takes precedence over our own Constitutional rights. Some public taxpayer supported schools teach the agenda of Islam and the overthrow of the American culture.

And we like Lebanon, Iraq, Indonesia and Europe will benevolently allow this evil deceptive Nation of Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our culture in the name of political correctness and multiculturalism.

It is just a matter of time, and all the world will be Islam, and all the world will be at peace under the oppression and dominance of Allah the god of Islam.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, now approaching two billion. This is because countries benevolently let Muslims in to become a part of their culture, except there is one problem, Muslims do not assimilate. Not only do they not assimilate, but they change everything and everyone around them into their own culture. So eventually as the Muslims become a significant minority, the host country incrementally gives in to Sharia rather than risk a Muslim uprising. Moreover, this continues until it is too late to reverse the process without a war. This is the documented history of every Islamic State in the world, and yet we continue to be ignorantly deceived into believing that we can change Islam. NO… They will change us, or we will die and become a distant memory just as has happened throughout history.
Islam will give us (“the Kaffaar”) three choices, convert, slavery, or death. We as a free people have a fourth choice and that is to fight. We can fight them now without bloodshed, or we and our children will fight them in the streets later, and that my friend will go down in history as the bloodiest civil war in the history of the world.

Islamic Iraq will never become a free democratic nation. A Muslim will never become your warm fuzzy friend.

Even IF you convert to Islam...

de Andréa