Thursday, January 31, 2008

Tolerance Suicide

Abraham Lincoln once wrote “If America were to ever fall, it would not be due to an enemy attacking us from without, but an enemy attacking us from within”

By de Andréa

Given Lincoln’s perspective of a nation torn asunder by Civil War, his words are worth noting.

The violent terror of Islam, since 610 AD has been a serious global threat that we must defeat once and for all. There is however, another threat to the safety, security, and liberty of our own country that we must also defeat – the threat of invasive “Cultural Jihad” and how it is aided by the forces of “Political Correctness.” and “Multiculturalism”.

Those of you who follow this issue closely, know this is not new information. You know Cultural Jihad in Great Britain and France – aided by political correctness – is well advanced. You know it is on the march in Canada, and has taken root here in America as well.

The picture is taken in the streets of NYC. In Paris Parisian women are not allow to go in public without their heads covered, because it may offend Muslims. Sharia law takes precedence over the rights of citizens.

It bears repeating, over and over, that we must be vigilant against the threat that lies within – a threat of “Suicide by tolerance.” We must be vigilant to stand up and proudly defend the core values that produced the greatness of Western Civilization. For as another great American, Thomas Jefferson, wrote: “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”

Walt Kelly, the cartoonist and satirist once had his famous character Pogo say, "We have met the enemy and he is us." In the clash between the West and Islam, this is increasingly true. We are our own worst enemy.

Those of us who care about the survival of Western civilization occasionally rage about the way Muslim organizations feign outrage in the media at the tiniest slight. We grind our teeth when those organizations file human rights complaints against the writings of the likes of Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant. We warn against our governments permitting the implementation of Sharia law and against the insidious teachings of imams at mosques and Islamic community centers as well as in our own public schools.

But really, could our enemy Islam take over this country unless our liberal hate America elites let them, or didn’t help them?

True, the Alberta human rights complaint against Levant was brought by something called the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada (ISCC), and the one against Steyn was initiated by the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), both of which make it look as if Muslims are behind these attacks on our free speech.

Read about legal Jihad on American writers by British Courts.
Yet would either grievance have gone anywhere in the absence of government-sponsored, tax-supported agencies that encourage vocal advocacy groups to lodge formal complaints against their foes, and then pay their way?

Imagine the fleeting lives of such complaints in the absence of laws -- passed by liberal Western politicians, not professional Muslim cause-pleaders --granting them legitimacy.

The Syed Soharwardys (ISCC head) and Mohammad Elmasrys (CIC boss) of the world might rail on to a sympathetic reporter or two about the indignations the Levants and Steyns are defaming their religion. However, without the backing of modern Western governments and the politically correct functionaries who pull their levers, open their money spigots and crack their whips, such complainants would be as trees falling in the forest with no one there to hear.

It wasn't the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIRCAN) that sent chief CIBC economist Jeff Rubin for Muslim sensitivity training three years ago after a bank financial report offended the particularly pugnacious, litigious Muslim organization. It was Rubin's fearful, PC bosses at CIBC.

Yes, CAIR-CAN, the CIC and the ISCC delight in taking full advantage of the official avenues open to them to criticize and intimidate their foes, but they didn't create those avenues and there is little they could do if our governments and politically correct corporations decided to close them tomorrow.

The best example of what I mean surfaced this week from the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency ( BECTA). Shoo Fly publishers of Newcastle has produced a very innovative, interactive software version of the Three Little Pigs -- a 3D book designed to encourage young children to develop critical thinking abilities. It has won several awards, but was not approved by BECTA because "the use of pigs raises cultural issues.” In particular, the company was told, "Judges would not recommend this product to the Muslim community," out of concern the pig images would be upsetting.British papers were instantly filled with headlines such as "PC gone mad! Muslims devour Little Red Riding Hood." The western government are promoting Islamic cultural jihad by taking the reins of the Muslim agenda themselves.

But, of course, Muslims had done no such thing. Indeed, the Muslim Council of Britain told the Daily Telegraph, "We are not offended by that at all," and called on British schools to welcome the books.

I am not saying Muslims pose no threat to our way of life. Of course if Muslims had their way we would all become converts, or at the very least servile dhimmah living at the whim and under the thumb of a worldwide Islamic twelfth Caliphate. Muslims who protested in the Western world two winters ago against the Danish cartoons of Muhammad, were enabled by our own PC elites to take to the streets carrying signs with slogans such as "Death to those who dishonor the Prophet." Moreoner they killed a few Catholic Nuns. Or the demand of death to the British teacher in Africa for naming the class teddy bear Muhammad.

Still, their infiltration of cultural jihad would go nowhere legally, culturally or politically without our governments, politicians, bureaucrats and experts bending over backwards and falling all over themselves to appear sensitive to the culture of our enemy.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Call it suicide by tolerance, call it what ever you want. But the Western world with its institutions of democracy and the rule of constitutional law, with its advances in science and medicine, its progress in individual liberty. Moreover, its historic devotion to reason and its developments in culture and the arts will soon disappear because its own elites could not be proud enough of its achievements to defend it from the enemy that is growing within.

If you had a malignant tumor, would you encourage it to grow? Think about it…

de Andréa

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Has Iowa Fallen?

Has Iowa fallen to Islam???
A Muslim Imam opens with prayer at the Iowa Statehouse asking Allah for "victory over those who disbelieve and the defeat of the great Satan”.

By de Andréa

Over the past few months I have written many articles providing insight into Islamic Jihad, a deceptive kind of jihad an insidious kind of jihad called “Cultural Jihad”. The Islamist incremental subversion of a society from within. Cultural Jihad is at a very advanced stage in countries like France and Great Britain, and it is on the march right here in America. This is the same type of Islamic surreptitious warfare that preceded the demise of Christian Democratic Lebanon in the 1980’s. Lebanon is now an Islamic State.

Unlike violent acts of terrorism, Cultural Jihad is not obvious, but it is just as fatal. It is the precursor of the “end game” the Islamization of a society and the replacement of existing law with strict Islamic Sharia law, which if necessary is followed by violent militant jihad, and then the takeover is complete.

The news story reported how a Muslim Imam opened the Iowa State legislative session with an obvious Muslim prayer to their god Allah that included an appeal for “victory over those who disbelieve” and “the defeat of the great Satan.” The “great Satan” referred to by Islam, is of course, the United States. “Victory over those who disbelieve” are the infidels, which is consistent with the Islamic teaching that Allah is to be dominant over all religions, governments, laws and people. This is to be accomplished through “Jihad” – which can take the form of a violent conquest and or a cultural subversion and ultimate subjugation.

That Muslims can now be so bold as to proclaim their ultimate objective and declare us their enemy – in such a public forum as a state legislative opening session – speaks volumes as to how far Cultural Jihad an the stealthy infiltration of America has already advanced.

My friends, this is why I continue to issue these warnings, alerts and information. This is why I am calling citizens to action and advocating the support of Act for America a subsidiary of American Congress for Truth, organizing across the country. Those who wish us harm, those who wish to steal our liberties and change our society, are not only “over there,” but they are right here in our midst. They are in our Government, they are in our military, they are in our cities and towns, they are providing curriculum to our schools they are in our, churches and they are in our homes. How is that possible? Because we do not recognize them for what they are. It is the Deception of Islam, True Lies. The Taqiya, the art of deception found in the Quran.

In the 1940’s, would we have allowed Nazis into our military? Or teach our children about Nazism in our schools, much less provide Nazi acceptance training for our Federal Security officers? Of course not, that would have been insane. Why? Because the Nazi agenda was to bury us, not to mention that we were a war with them. Where do you think Hitler found his philosophy for Mein Kampf and Nazism? Of course, from the Quran, Nazism was a modern day Islam with the same basic agenda right down to the extermination of the Jews. We were deceived in the 1930’s because no one, that is no one except Sir Winston Churchill had read Hitler’s book Mein Kampf which means “My Struggle”. Today no one has read about world jihad in the Quran. Guess what Jihad means? It means the “Struggle of Islam” It is the same agenda, the same struggle, and that is to conquer and subjugate the world under the control and theocracy of Islamic Sharia Law.

If you would like to assist in the efforts of ACT, The American Congress for Truth to continue to bring this truth to the attention of the American people with a financial contribution, please click here

If you would like to know more about Brigitte Gabriel and ACT, Watch videos here.

To read the entire story of the Iowa Legislative Prayer, click hear: Storm Lake Pilot Tribune, January 24, 2008

THE BOTTOM LINE: If you and I do nothing to stop this infiltration of our culture with this deceptive and destructive theocracy of Islam then no one will. We the people are the foundation of this country, and for the most part, we are deceived, or we think someone else will take care of this problem. If you value your liberty and your freedom, I strongly urge you to join and support the American Congress for Truth. Find out all you can about this evil agenda of Islam. If we fight against it, we will prevail, if we turn a blind eye, we will as Lebanon, lose our country.

de Andréa

Tuesday, January 29, 2008


Are they real; or the biggest fraud in the medical and pharmaceutical professions…?
Parents Desperate Search for Answers

By de Andréa

Many new avenues of creativity were introduced into our society as we approached the twenty first century; such as Global Warming and letting forest fires burn because they are natural. One of these modern liberal ideas came from the world of Psychiatry; it is a new creative reason or excuse for the medical specialty, as well as the development of new anti-psychotic pharmaceutical drugs.

Designer Diseases
The main difference between these diseases and other diseases are that either the medicine is developed first, then a disease is created to support the need for the medicine. Or, the disease is created so that a medicine can be created for the disease, either way, it is a 15 billion dollar a year business that may be doing nothing more than creating a plethora of side effects including death. Moreover, in the case of children, these drugs may be interfering with normal child brain development.

Probably the most well known of these Designer Diseases is A.D.D Attention Deficit Disorder or a custom made variation of the disease, ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Suggesting that the person afflicted with this dreaded disease is board, and or, has an enormous amount of energy. The group most afflicted with this disease is the little people of the male gender, boys from preschool age through junior high. (A group not likely to protest) Moreover, these children are dying by the hundreds every year, no, not from the so-called disease, but from the drug treatment program.

The OriginThe question that came to my mind was where did this new children’s disease come from? It seams to be an epidemic, with no origin. Is this a new kind of virus or a bacterium from another planet? No, it is a mental disorder created by the same liberals that created global warming and natural forest fires. A.D.D. was created by a small group of people starting with a militant liberal lesbian feminist schoolteacher, together with a Pharmacist, a Marketing Engineer, and an MD. Moreover, to date these so-called diseases have no medical foundation or even a consensus.

In many cases, parents are coerced, even threatened by the school and Child Protective Services to put their child on drugs or face charges of child neglect or some other trumpet up charge. It is a monetary advantage for schools to get as many children as possible diagnosed with A.D.D because they receive additional money for special education programs.

The ugly motiveBorn out of laziness, irresponsibility, incompetence and a desire to subjugate the male of the species; this part of the feminist movement created a way to vanquish male children in a bazaar attempt at female domination. The subsequent drugs to deal with these rowdy little boys, that were destined to become testosterone factories -- came to the rescue. Teachers and parents of course, welcomed the new wonder drug Methylphenidate better known as Ritalin named after the creator of the disease Rita Lin and Amphetamines or Atomoxetime, which sedated the little boys and made their heads full of mush quiet and orderly. One less problem/responsibility a teacher or a parent needs to deal with until it comes to learning; kids on drugs become learning impaired, oh well at least they are quiet and manageable. This may have possibly created yet another need for a designer disease that impairs their ability to learn, this may be one reason why they cannot be taught to read; maybe somebody could design a drug for that.

SymptomsI do not deny that the symptoms of some of these disorders are real and do exist, however for the most part they are just normal human traits especially in children, or in some cases the symptoms are misdiagnosed and are actually symptoms of an other kind of disorder altogether such as hypoglycemia. By calling it a mental disease and drugging children up does not address the problem and certainly does not cure the symptom. It creates dependence, sedates it, and covers it up, and that is why it seems to take care of the problem until one runs out of drugs or forgets to take them or even worse, they have caused death. So in order to escape the responsibility for dealing with the normal developmental stage or trait, one just pops a pill into the child’s mouth, it’s magic.

Just a side noteAlbert Einstein the famous Physics genius had all the symptoms of ADHD. But of course the disease had not been invented yet. Just think for a moment, what if little Al had been drugged up with Amphetamines instead of being allowed to develop normally. He had so much energy and was so board as well as having a problem with a late brain development disorder now called LD (Learning disabilities) a perceptual problem commonly known as Dyslexia, he failed the third grade, couldn’t read or write, and yet through normal development, he went on to become a mathematical and astronomical genius. One has to wonder how many geniuses, potential inventors or possible future Presidents are all drugged up because parents and teachers do not want to deal with an energetic special child, and as a result, their brains will never develop normally and may never reach their full potential.

Did you know that the ADHD diagnosis checklist of behaviors is almost the same as the list of behaviors for gifted children (visit The National Foundation for Gifted and Creative Children)

Thousands of children are being diagnosed or misdiagnosed with HDD, ADHD, ODD, OCD, BI-POLAR-1 AND 2, and the latest one IED, are given drugs like Methylphenidate Amphetamines, Atomoxetime, Quanadean, Azanax, Trilipthal, Focolin as well as a plethora of other dangerous untested anti-psychotic anti-anxiety or sedation pharmaceuticals.

Desperate ParentsWhat is a parent to do when the schoolteacher or the principle says, your child is unruly unmanageable or does not stay on task. Moreover, she, the principle or he, the teacher recommends some kind of drug regiment. [A teacher has decided that your child needs to be on drugs] In addition, if the parent refuses, the teacher calls the child protection agency and they threaten to remove the child from the home on the grounds of child neglect and endangerment.

The frightened and bewildered parents bring the child to a psychiatrist and the child becomes a guinea pig for the field of psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry. The Doctor listens to the desperate parents tell their tail of woe and prescribes the first drug.

A spiraling agenda
Nearly all drugs have a side affect of some kind, some are mild, and some are quite severe. The parents notice a change in the behavior of their child, in one area it seems an improvement. However, the child has developed something not noticed before. [A SIDE EFFECT] Not to worry says the doctor as he prescribes yet another drug to counteract the side effect of the first drug, which of course also produces additional side effects, which of course call for additional drugs.

And so it goes, in a few years the child has developed all kinds of psychotic behaviors and symptoms as well as tic’s [sudden uncontrollable outbursts or a constant rolling of the eyes or head]. Cutting back on some drugs and the addition of some more new drugs should take care of that the doctor says, but it does not. Moreover, by now the parents as well as the child have become Para-pharmacists with a whole house full of wonderful little colored pills and capsules.

Looking BackThe parents cannot help but wonder if all these drugs are doing their child any good. They look back at the original reason for the medication; their boy was full of energy and just had a slight short attention span. However, now their child sometimes acts like a zombie and has dozens of out of control symptoms that they think are caused by the med’s.

The parents don’t know how right they are, plus their child may be damaged beyond repair depending on how old, and how long he or she has been on these untested experimental drugs.

Child brain developmentThe mistaken idea that a child is fully developed at birth sometimes causes one to think that because their child just does not act as they think he or she should, that there is something wrong. A child’s brain at birth is virtually flat because it is not fully developed. As the child grows and develops, his brain learns what behavior is proper, what is acceptable, and what is not. The brain learns what is expected of it and as it develops, it begins to take on that cottage cheese or wrinkled look.

The downside of drugsIf this normal child brain development is interrupted by the introduction of drugs to arrive at an easy quick fix solution for normal developmental fazes, then the neuro-pathways in the child’s brain do not develop. The result is a dependency on the drugs to suppress what the brain should have learned to develop naturally. As well as a myriad of new psychotic behaviors brought on by the side effects of the drugs.

A child naturally goes through learning stages, such as weaning, potty training, and oh, the terrible two’s. Moreover, when they get to be teenagers there is another set of developmental and behavior problems [HORMONES]. All along the way toward the completion of the child and brain development, that will not arrive in many cases until age 18, the brain must be allowed to naturally build pathways that will route themselves around troublesome areas that enable them to cope with life. Behavior is a learned experience; a child is not born knowing fear, anxiety, anger, love, understanding, patience and self-control etcetera. All these things must be experienced in order for the brain to learn the proper way to cope with these normal encounters.

Drugs prevent normal brain development
The introduction of these suppressants, depressants, stimulants, anti this and anti that, into the developing brain of a child, masks the experience, or causes it to go away altogether and thus prevents the brain from normal psychological development. Eventually this window of opportunity for proper and normal brain development is passed by, never to return, the Pituitary shuts off growth, and development ceases.

Autism and drugs
One has to wonder where did Autism come from? Doctors do not know, except that they think it is genetic. It is obviously a brain dysfunction but the cause is not known. It is showing up at an ever-increasing and alarming rate. It may be that as these drugged children grow into adults with underdeveloped or abnormally developed brains, and this abnormal brain cellular structure eventually finds its way into the genetic DNA code of an unsuspecting newborn child. We then have real defects such as Downs Syndrome, Autism, Psychopathic behaviors such as Paranoia and Schizophrenia, in other words, real problems.

A growing industry
Not to be outdone in this new lucrative industry are such designer diseases as RLS, Restless Leg Syndrome for which there is of course a pretty colored designer pill. E.D, Erectile Dysfunction for which there is also a pill, and many more normal human traits that have been turned into diseases. The latest addition to our designer disease portfolio is I.E.D. no, ha, ha, not Improvised Explosive Devises, that is an Iraqi terrorist disease, but it is close, this new designer disease is called Intermittent Explosive Disorder, I.E.D. The new disease announced on the A.P. on June 6, 2006, is in its infancy as far as designer diseases go, it is so new that there is little information about it yet. After all, it has just been invented, give them a little creative time. According to the so-called experts, this is a disease that causes such symptoms as bar fights, road rage and spousal abuse. So all you people out there that have poked somebody’s lights out in a bar or have run somebody down on the street because they made an obscene gesture, or husbands who have beat their wives nearly to death. Good news, you are not responsible; you are victims, and simply have a new designer disease, for which I am sure; there will be pretty pink designer drug forthcoming.

THE BOTTOM LINE: According to this new Airhead Liberal Philosophy, we are not responsible for anything; we are just victims of a new “Designer Disease”. Well I have news for the Lib’s, LIBERALISM IS A REAL MENTAL DISORDER, in which I think at least is partially caused by mixing too many designer drugs, sniffing funny white powder and smoking too many funny cigarettes...

de Andréa

For more Information on ADD, ADHD and the drugs used to treat it, click on this…

Monday, January 28, 2008

An American Textbook

More Deception
Islamic 'jihad' means doing good works and Muslims fighting 'to protect themselves from Infidels especially Christians and Jews.

By de Andréa

Islamic "jihad" is an effort by Muslims to convince "others to take up worthy causes, such as funding medical research, and other charitable efforts" according to a middle school textbook used in California and other states.

It teaches even at its most violent, "jihad" is simply Muslims fighting "to protect themselves from those who would do them harm," says the "History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond" book published by Teachers' Curriculum Institute.

If allowed to continue, and I have no reason to think otherwise, this brainwashing and propagandizing of our children in America, as well as the ongoing infiltration into our military and government, will lead to a predatory Islamic culture in America within the next 20 years. At that point, violent Islamic Jihad will be a daily experience in our streets, just as it is now in much of Europe. This coupled with the systematic destruction of our Constitution such as the hate speech laws and the disarming of U.S. Citizens leaving us at the mercy of the Islamic Jihadists we will soon be dominated by the Nation if Islam.

The picture is what American schools will look like if this propaganda is allowed to continue.

The following is what is going on all over America, pay very close attention to the deception and the infiltration of Islam into the text of U.S. School curriculum. This first wave of propaganda is to gain acceptance, once acceptance is achieved, the brainwashing of the ideologies of Islam will follow.

A parent whose child has been handed the text in a Sacramento district is accusing the publisher of a pro-Muslim bias to the point that Islamic theology has been incorporated into the public school curriculum.

"It makes an attempt to seem like an egalitarian world history book, but on closer inspection you find that seven (not all are titled so) of the chapters deal with Islam or Muslim subjects," wrote the parent, whose name is being withheld.

"The upsetting part is not only do they go into the history (which would be acceptable) but also the teaching of Islam," she said. "This book does not really go into Christianity or the teachings of Christ, nor does it address religious doctrine elsewhere to the degree it does Islam."

She said the book's one page referencing Jews "is only to convey that they were tortured by Christian Crusaders to get them to convert to ‘Christianity.’ (It fails to mention that the biggest persecutors of Jews throughout history and still today are Arab Muslims). It gives four other one-liner references to the Jews being blamed for the plagues and problems in the land.

"How can the writers of this text get away with this?" she asked. Bert Bower, founder of TCI, said not only did his company have experts review the book, but the state of California also reviewed it, and has approved it for use in public schools.

Note the brainwashing techniques:
He said the company tries to move history out from between the covers of a textbook and into students' minds, and that is how the book was developed.

"Keep in mind when looking at this particular book, scholars from all over California (reviewed it)," he said. "We have our own scholars who created the program; California scholars look at the program to make sure that it is accurate."

One of those experts who contributed to the text, according to the American Textbook Council, which released a scathing indictment of the project, is Ayad Al-Qazzaz.
"Al-Qazzaz is a Muslim apologist, a frequent speaker in Northern California school districts promoting Islam and Arab causes," the ATC review said. "Al-Qazzaz also co-wrote AWAIR's 'Arab World Notebook.’ AWAIR stands for Arab World and Islamic Resources, an opaque, proselytizing 'non-profit organization' that conducts teacher workshops and sells supplementary materials to schools."

The textbook council, an independent national research group set up in 1989 to review history and social studies texts in public schools, quoted directly from the book to provide evidence of its bias.

The Deception
The word jihad means, "to strive or struggle (just as Hitler’s “Mine Kampf” which means “My Struggle” in the conquest of the world) Jihad represents the human struggle to overcome difficulties and do things that would be pleasing to Allah. Muslims strive to respond positively to personal difficulties as well as worldly challenges. For instance, they might work to become better people, reform society, or correct injustice.

Jihad has always been an important Islamic concept. One hadith, (or account of Muhammad), tells about the prophet's return from a battle. He declared that he and his men had carried out the "lesser jihad," the external struggle against oppression. The "greater jihad," he said, was the fight against evil within oneself. Examples of the greater jihad include working hard for a goal, (world domination) giving up a bad habit, getting an education or obeying your parents when you may not want to.

Another hadith says that Muslims should fulfill jihad with the heart, tongue, and hand. Muslims use the heart in their struggle to resist evil. (Evil is classified as anything that is not Islamic) The tongue may convince others to take up worthy causes, such as funding medical research. Hands may perform good works and correct wrongs.

Sometimes, however, jihad becomes a physical struggle. The Quran tells Muslims to fight to protect themselves from those who would do them harm or to right a terrible wrong.(meaning revenge) Early Muslims considered their efforts to protect their territory and extend their rule over other regions to be a form of jihad. However, the Quran forbade Muslims to force others to convert to Islam. (An outright lie) So, non-Muslims who came under Muslim rule were allowed to practice their faiths."(Another lie)

The council, in describing the text as a book written by "dictation from Islamic sources," said such passages "should put speculation to rest about what California's seventh-grade students may learn about Islam. At the very least, the passages are incomplete. More precisely, they are dishonest and deceptive"

Such passages fail to explain "the essentially religious nature of the subject," the council said. "It ignores any challenge to international security and western-style law. The treatment is lyrical and loaded, echoing the language and deception recommended by Islamist consultants.” It fails for example, to identify Islam as a theocracy.

The Sacramento parent said she became suspicious because of the school's decision to send a copy of the book home with her son and he started describing how it would teach students to write in Arabic an how Islam is a teaching of peace..

A review left her even more worried. "I was disturbed because the greatest portion of this book is about Islam. It goes into the doctrine of Islam in detail, and does not reflect the truth," she said. "There are 35 chapters. Out of those, I counted at least seven [that focus] on Islam."

Text written by a Muslim propagandist
She said she looked at the publication's list of contributors, and found the name of Ayad Al-Qazzaz, whom she had herself for a class on Middle Eastern studies.” That was a big red flag for me," she said.

Read report by World Net Daily on the influence of Islamic "consultants" on public school texts in the United States, as well as how other schools have included the "Five Pillars of Islam" among their required courses.

The parent said she just wanted people to know of the agenda being taught. "After seeing Al-Qazzaz as one of the main contributors I began to put two and two together … about the extra book coming home only in this class and I questioned where this book's money source came from – I still do not know," she said. A clue about a place to start might be CAIR, the Counsel on American Islamic Relations, an “Islamic Terrorist Organization” operating and infiltrating in the United States.

"I am very troubled that in the name of tolerance and educating American children about the Muslim empire in history they get away with giving beginning Islamic teaching which may cause many to perhaps one day become Muslims," she said. "My son tells me that the students will even be using calligraphy to copy parts of the Quran in Arabic as an enrichment activity.” This parent doesn’t know how right on she is with her concerns.

A prime example of blind deception
The ATC's second excerpt from the book dealt with the definition and encouragement of Sharia law. "For example, the Quran teaches women to 'not display their beauty.' For this reason, Muslim women wear different forms of modest dress. Women cover their arms and legs. And also wear scarves over the hair, and the lower part of their face" the book said.

Christianity is addressed in chapters 3, 6, 31 and 32 of the book, including descriptions of the Crusades. The company's website shows an entire unit called, "The Rise of Islam," including chapters on the Arabian Peninsula, "The Prophet Muhammad," "The Teachings of Islam," "Contributions of Muslims to World Civilizations," and "From the Crusades to the Rise of New Muslim Empires."

The recommendations included that "students learn about the beliefs and practices of Islam" and "learn about the life of Muhammad and the rise, expansion and superiority of Muslim rule."

Promoters of the text say, “the textbook is the answer to the demands in today's society for a "multicultural" education, and whenever some historical subjects are taught, there is always controversy”.

Bower’s book, he said, "really gives students multiple perspectives." he also said he wasn't aware of any agenda held by any contributors to the book, including Al-Qazzaz. "I'll have to look into that," he said.

He said about one-third of California's districts use the book and so do thousands of other districts across the country.

Others may agree that students need to know about the world in which they live, but the TCI book is not the right one to teach them.

Reactions in other States
According to a report from William J. Bennetta at the Textbook League, officials in Scottsdale, Ariz., tested the book, and ultimately rejected it after parents rallied to complain. "Students who took a 7th-grade social students course … were subject to gross, prolonged indoctrination in Islam," he wrote.

He wrote: "Much of the indoctrination was delivered in a corrupt school text book titled 'History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond,' produced by [TCI]," he said. "The writers of [the book], by relentlessly presenting Muslim religious tales and religious beliefs as matters of historical fact, have striven hard to induce students to embrace Islam."

He wrote that the indoctrination is "concentrated in chapters 8 and 9. This material consists overwhelmingly of Islamic religious propaganda. It includes blatant preaching as well as deceptive claims and extensive fraudulent narratives dealing with the beginnings of Islam, the life of Muhammad, and the inception of the Quran. These claims and narratives are disguised as accounts of history. They actually are restatements of Muslim fables and superstitions."

Bennetta also noted that the book exhibits contempt for Judaism and Christianity. "For example, in a passage in chapter 9, the TCI writers convey the lesson that a religious view held by Muslims is important, but views held by Jews and Christians are unworthy of consideration."

Further evidence of deception
Even the level of scholarly work is deficient, he continued. "They teach, in chapter 9, that if someone encounters some antiquated hearsay and jots it down, the hearsay becomes 'written evidence' of historical happenings."

In an Internet posting about the Scottsdale’s use of the text, Janie White, a parent in the district, reported the book included "fake history" along with "Islamic religious proselytizing and indoctrination techniques."

Officials with the Sacramento school district declined to respond to requests for comment about the book and its use.

Al-Qazzaz, who teaches at Cal State-Sacramento, has explained in other Internet postings "greater jihad" is to become better Muslims and "lesser jihad" is to fight against Islam's enemies. What he failed to mention, is that the Quran teaches that Islam is the enemy of everyone.

THE BOTTOM LINE: For those of you that have expressed doubt about the Infiltration and Jihad of America, I don’t know what it will take to cause your blind eyes to see, but the education or in this case the false teaching, propagandizing, and brainwashing of ones children is the easiest and most effective way of modifying a culture.

In the case of Islam, (a very patient people) the agenda is not to learn the ways of the West but to dominate the world with Islamic Sharia law. It matters little how long, or what it takes to achieve this agenda, after all they have been at it for almost 1400 years, as long as they continue the Jihad (the struggle just as Nazism’s Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf) to conquer the earth for their god, they believe Allah will look at them with favor.

The Taqiya or Taqiyyah the Islamic deception (true lies) doctrine found all through the Quran (although deceptively hidden) is what Islam is using on the West to deceive and alter the minds of Western culture into accepting Islamic Sharia law, to ultimately replace our entire Constitution and vision of America with the agenda of Islam.

The brainwashing of our children with Taqiya is a very powerful tool in the infiltration of cultural Jihad in the West. This has already proven to be successful throughout Europe.

The perspective on this is as if we would have promoted the teaching of Nazism in our schools during the 1920’s and 30’s before the war was over in the 40’s we would have embraced Nazism, moreover we would have exterminated our own Jews.

Parents with children in American public schools should either pull their kids out of these propaganda factories and put them in private schools, or home school them. If neither is possible then one should closely monitor the curriculum that is being taught to their children. If parents fail to do this, the future of ones children will be, problematic at best, at worst they will side with Islam in the Jihad of America; they may just turn out to be your worst enemy…

de Andréa

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Warm Fuzzy Muslims

“Our followers must live in peace until strong enough to wage violent jihad

By de Andréa

The Quote is from one of the most respected Moderate Deobandi Muslim scholars in the world, he believes that aggressive military jihad should be ultimately waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide.

Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani one of these warm fuzzy moderate Muslims argues that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain and the United States, where they have the freedom to practice Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in the battle of militant Jihad.

The picture as one can see is that of a sleeper warm fuzzy Muslim, privately practicing with his AK47 until the time comes for militant violent Jihad.

Usmani’s views explode the myth that the creed of an extremist offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of over all traditional Islamic thinking.

Mr Usmani, 64, sat for 20 years as a Sharia judge in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. He is an adviser to several global financial institutions and a regular visitor to Britain. Polite and softly spoken, he revealed to The Times a detailed knowledge of world events.
He agreed that it was wrong to suggest that the entire non-Muslim world was intent on destroying Islam. Yet this is a man who, in his published work, argues the case for Muslims to wage an expansionist jihad war against non-Muslim lands.

Mr Usmani’s justification for aggressive military jihad as a means of establishing global Islamic supremacy is revealed at the climax of his book, “Islam and Modernism”. The book is a polemical work against Islamic modernists who seek to convert the entire Koran into “a poetic and metaphorical book” because, he says, they have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology.

This deceptive type of poetic version incidentally, is what many westerners have been exposed to, believing they have read the Islamic Quran. When in fact they have read a version of the Koran that reinforces their desired perception of a peaceful religion. Meanwhile they continue their stealthy infiltration into our society, incrementally and surreptitiously changing our culture into that of Islam.

The final chapter delivers a rebuke to those who believe that only defensive jihad (fighting to defend a Muslim land that is under attack or occupation) is permissible in Islam. He refutes the suggestion that jihad is unlawful against a non-Muslim state that freely permits the preaching of Islam.

For Mr Usmani, “the question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not”. “If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?”

He answers his own question thus: “Even in those days . . . aggressive jihads were waged . . . because it was truly commendable for establishing the grandeur of the religion of Allah.”

These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the so-called “Moderate Muuslim” Deobandi tradition.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Please understand this, if you ask a so-called moderate Muslim if he condones terrorism, and the reply is of course not, he says that the Quran absolutely forbids the use of violence in Islam, then you walk away satisfied that he is your friend, you however, have just been deceived with the truth. It is the oldest form of deception on earth. In Arabic it is called the doctrine of Taqiya, in English, true lies.

What your warm fuzzy moderate Muslim is really saying is that the Quran forbids terrorism in Islam by infidels (non-Muslims). However, violent Jihad of every kind if it is useful in establishing Islam as the Umma (the world Nation of Islam) is a Command of Allah. So you ignorantly asked the wrong question. It really wouldn’t have mattered though, Muslims are masters of deception, he would simply have deceived you in another way. .

de Andréa

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Sack The Experts

Stephen Coughlin, the Pentagon resident expert on Islamic Sharia law and Islamist philosophy, has been fired from his position on the military's Joint Staff. The reason; he is anti-Islam.

By de Andréa

He is anti-Islam… this is tantamount to saying he was anti-Nazi if this were 1939. Only now because the US has been mystically charmed by this powerful spiritual deception of Islam, to be an enemy of our enemy is not only politically incorrect it is something just short of treason.

Coughlin, as I did in the previous article “Muslims in Our Ranks” dared among other things, to call attention to the danger. The only difference is, I don’t work for the Pentagon.

This action followed a report revealing opposition to his work for the military by pro-Muslim officials within the office of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England. This just shows the depth to which our enemy has infiltrated our government, as well as where the power now lies.

Mr. Coughlin was notified that his contract with the Joint Chiefs of Staff would end in March, effectively halting the career of the U.S. government's most important figures in analyzing the nature of the Islamic agenda and ultimately preparing to wage ideological war against it.

He had run afoul of a key aide to Mr. England, his name, Hasham Islam a practicing Muslim, who confronted Mr. Coughlin during a meeting several weeks ago when Mr. Islam sought to have Mr. Coughlin soften his views on American Islamic Jihad.

Mr. Coughlin was accused directly by Mr. Islam of being a Christian zealot or extremist "with a pen," according to defense officials. Mr. Coughlin appears to have become one of the first casualties in the war against the deception of Islamic infiltration in the U.S.
The officials said Mr. Coughlin was let go because he had become "too hot" or controversial within the Pentagon.

Misguided and deceived Pentagon officials, including Mr. England, have initiated an aggressive "outreach" program to U.S. Muslim groups that critics say is lending credibility to what has been identified as a budding support network for Islamist Jihadists, including front groups for the radical terrorist group “The Muslim Brotherhood.”

Mr. Coughlin wrote a memorandum several months ago based on documents made public in a federal trial in Dallas that revealed a covert plan by the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egyptian-origin Islamist terrorist group, to subvert the United States using front groups. A member of one of the identified front groups, the Islamic Society of North America, has been hosted by Mr. England at the Pentagon.

After word of the confrontation between Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Islam was made public, support for Mr. Coughlin skyrocketed among those in and out of government who feared the worst, namely that pro-Muslim officials in the Pentagon were after Mr. Coughlin's scalp, and that his departure would be a major setback for the Pentagon's struggling efforts to develop a war of ideas against our enemy the Nation of Islam. Blogs lit up with hundreds of postings, some suggesting that Mr. England's office is "penetrated" and infiltrated by our enemy in the war on terrorism.

Kevin Wensing, a spokesman for Mr. England, said "no one in the deputy's office had any input into this decision" by the Joint Staff to end Mr. Coughlin's contract. A Joint Staff spokesman had no immediate comment.

The firing of the Pentagon’s only resident expert on Islamic Sharia law, Maj. Stephen Coughlin, has begun to attract the attention of key members of Congress and the White House. This has launched a “fact-finding” mission into the case, Coughlin, of the U.S. Army Reserves, was on contract to the Joint Chiefs of Staff to brief U.S. commanders en route to Iraq, as well as officers at various staff colleges around the country, on the role of Islamic teachings in the mind of America’s enemies.The aide, Hesham Islam, is an Egyptian-born Muslim Arab and former U.S. Navy officer, who joined England’s staff while he was secretary of the Navy in 2001 and moved with him when England was promoted to the Pentagon’s No. 2 slot.

Heshem Islam encouraged England to address the annual conference of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) last fall, even though federal prosecutors had named the group as an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism funding case last year.Coughlin aroused the ire of Mr. Islam and others in September by authoring an analysis of a Muslim Brotherhood document entered into evidence in the Justice Department’s case against the Islamic terrorist group, the Holy Land Foundation.

In addition to naming ISNA and other “mainstream” Muslim organizations as members of the Muslim Brotherhood’s network in the United States, the Muslim Brotherhood document stated that its members “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within… It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes.” (Meaning when the infiltration is complete and militant Jihad begins.)

Coughlin also took issue with an effort underway by intelligence community analysts to declare al Qaeda terrorists and insurgents in Iraq as “false Muslims,” whose version of Jihad conflicted with “true” Islamic teachings. (Ultimately, violent militant Jihad is what the Quran teaches all true Muslims, to complete the agenda of Islam to conquer the world and bring all its people in subjugation to Sharia Law.)

Over the past two weeks, the White House has launched its own investigation into the Coughlin affair, and has conducted at least one interview with Coughlin himself.

However, Coughlin would appear to hold out little hope of a White House “rescue.”As he pointed out in his 333-page thesis, “To Our Great Detriment: Ignoring what Extremists say about Jihad,” President Bush’s statements downplaying the role of Islam in the terrorist attacks on America have “exerted a chilling effect on those tasked to define the enemy’s doctrine by effectively placing a policy bar” on examining the role of Jihadist teachings.

Even Coughlin supporters such as Frank Gaffney Jr., president of the Center for Security Policy, doubt that the Army reservist lawyer and expert on Islamic law will get his contract reinstated by the Joint Chiefs. However, Gaffney has urged members of Congress in both parties and others who care about the war on terror to make Coughlin “a cause célèbre” over the next two months.

Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., has taken that call seriously, and said last week that she was examining the possibility of holding congressional oversight hearings of Coughlin’s dismissal.

“We want to get to the bottom of this,” Myrick said. “This sounds like another example of someone protecting national security and being told to shut up,” she told Cybercast news service. “If we don’t get over being politically correct, we won’t be here as a country.”

Myrick co-chairs the bi-partisan House Anti-Terrorism Caucus with Rep. Jane Harmon, D-Ca, which she started last year out of frustration that no one was educating the American people about the threat from the infiltration of Islamo-fascism.

“President Bush does not talk to the American people about the long-term threat of Islamo-fascism infiltration in America,” she said.

Coughlin writes in the introduction to his 333-page thesis that his research into the legal underpinnings of jihadi doctrine was inspired in part by a Dec. 1, 2005, speech by Gen. Peter Pace to the National Defense University, when Pace was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“To talk about how we are going to proceed, we need to understand the nature of the enemy,… [which] is different than any we have faced in the past,” Pace said.

“Remember Hitler. Remember he wrote ‘Mein Kampf.’ He said in writing exactly what his plan was, and we collectively ignored that to our great detriment,” Pace argued. “Now, our enemies have said publicly on film, on the Internet, their goal is to destroy our way of life. The Nations book, the Quran supports this threat just as the Nazi’s book Mein Kampf did. "

No equivocation on their part. They are not saying if you stay home, we will not come after you. They are saying their goal is to rid the Middle East of all foreigners. Then, overthrow all governments that are not friendly to them, which means every single government,” Pace said.

Coughlin argues in his thesis that the U.S. intelligence community is making a similar mistake today as it made in the 1930s, by not reading what the enemy has said and written about their goals.

Officers who have listened to Coughlin’s presentation on the Islamic underpinnings of the jihadist movement have come to his aid.

“The termination of Stephen Coughlin on the Joint Staff is an act of intellectual cowardice,” Lt. Col. Joseph C. Myers, Army adviser to the Air Command and Staff College, wrote on Jan. 5 public letter of support.

“Coughlin has briefed senior Marine Corps leaders and staff and has presented his thesis in various military education venues,” Myers wrote.

“We have spent much intellectual capital revamping and analyzing our own doctrine as it relates to counterinsurgency. It’s time we do our homework on the threat,” he added.Former Army intelligence officer Jerome Gordon, who has discussed Coughlin’s thesis with former colleagues who have attended his briefings, said that Hesham Islam is not Coughlin’s only enemy.
“If there is a cabal that is opposing him, it’s in the military intelligence community,” Gordon said. “Clearly, they have been cowed by the significant entrée provided by the U.S. government to leaders of Muslim Brotherhood fronts here in America.”

In a 153-slide PowerPoint presentation he uses to brief U.S. military officers headed for the Middle East, Coughlin criticizes analysts such as Harlan Ullman, a Washington Times columnist who boasts of his ties to Condoleezza Rice.

Ullman wrote in a November 2007 column. “Unlike the Nazis, these extremists lack a central, unifying ideology; they come from many diverse movements and so far have not been inclined to develop a political theory for seizing political power.”

Coughlin called that statement a “non-sequitur,” and said that U.S. military officers had a “duty” to base their assessment on an objective analysis of the facts, not on assumptions or desires.
“If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes… and Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English… then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal, professional duty to know the enemy that includes ALL the knowable facts associated with the law of jihad,” Coughlin argued.

Dr. Walid Phares, director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, believes that Coughlin’s firing lies “at a very serious fault line” in U.S. defense strategies.

“I don’t understand why is there so much intellectual commotion about this matter in the West and in the U.S.,” Dr. Phares said. “Muslim scholars and historians agree that the theological texts have also a military dimension. The whole Nation of Islam is a deceptive theocracy. In Islamic studies, there is no debate about that. So why is there one in non-Muslim research and political circles, particularly in America? Major Coughlin was studying the texts used by the Jihadists to call for military action.”

While politicians might attempt to separate Islam from the Quran or from Jihad for their own purposes, Phares added, “the study of the theological roots of Jihad is something else, and that is an academic not a political issue.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: After wading through all the political jargon and spin on what Islam is or is not, one only needs to open ones eyes and look around the world and see what the weather is, no matter what the weather man says it is. While the weatherman is saying that the temperature is 100 degrees and clear, one only needs to look out the window to see that it is in fact a blizzard out there with two feet of snow on the ground; one does not even need a thermometer to tell that it is freezing cold. Wake up America…

Islam is at war with every people around the world that are not Muslims and even some that are. The agenda of Islam is to conquer the entire world and bring it under Islamic Sharia law, despite the politically correct multi-cultural apologist and America haters saying that Islam is a Nation of Peace. Where’s the Peace???

Look out your window; if you wait long enough you will see the peaceful Nation of Islam making war in your streets…

de Andréa

Muslims In Our Ranks

AMERICA IS BOWING TO MECCA. Those of you who are not aware of this massive surreptitious Islamic Jihad of cultural Infiltration going on in America, haven’t been reading my editorials. Islam is, and has been infiltrating everything and everywhere in this free nation of ours. If Americans continue in their complacency and ignore the truth this incremental cultural jihad will not be stopped.

By de Andréa

Islam has already infiltrated every square millimeter of our lives to some degree. Several reasons for not being aware of this are: One, deception Two, stealth. Three, ignorance. Four, noninvolvement. Five, brainwashed. I urge you to pick your reason, and over come it. If you refuse, then I suggest that you buy a gun or a prayer rug because you will need one or the other.

Cultural Jihad is Growing in our Military
In a special ceremony, the Pentagon recently promoted a Wahhabi terrorist-trained Muslim chaplain who catered to al-Qaida detainees at Guantanamo and fought to establish the first mosque in Marine Corps history.

Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England personally promoted Navy chaplain Abuhena Mohammed Saifulislam from lieutenant to lieutenant commander. Saifulislam also received a Joint Service Commendation Medal at the Pentagon ceremony held on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Pentagon officials say the ceremony was unprecedented.“ It's unusual for a deputy secretary to personally promote an officer of that rank," said one official who wished to go unnamed. "No one has known of such a high-level dignitary doing that."
Secretary England also earlier this year personally dedicated a new Islamic center at Marine headquarters in Quantico, Va., on the advice of Saifulislam, a Bangladesh immigrant who became a U.S. citizen in 1995.

The Muslim chaplain, who is stationed at Quantico, recited verses from the Quran in Arabic and English at the summer dedication ceremony, which included representatives from CAIR the Council on American-Islamic Relations, several leaders of which have already been convicted on terrorism-related charges.

The Sword of IslamSaifulislam, which is Arabic for "Sword of Islam," received his religious training at a Wahhabi terrorists Islamic school raided by federal agents after 9/11. The Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, based in Leesburg, Va., is run by Taha Jaber Al-Alwani, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Sami al-Arian terror case. A federal affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search the school alleges Al-Alwani gave at least $50,000 in jihad money "to support suicide bombings."

Saifulislam insists he is a warm fuzzy moderate Muslim and condemns "terrorism," but critics say his Wahhabi background and associations should give the Pentagon a clue to his deception.
“ The Pentagon is giving him a permanent, taxpayer-supported platform from which to convert our military to Islam," said terror expert Paul Sperry, a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington." "With the Quantico mosque, the Pentagon is facilitating the promotion of the Quran, the text book the enemy uses, heretically or not, as their manual of warfare."

Saifulislam's promotion along with the dedication of his new Quantico mosque – the first of its kind in the 230-year history of the Corps – comes on the heels of a Muslim spy scandal at Gitmo involving another Muslim U.S. Military Chaplain.

Army Capt. James "Yousef" Yee, who ministered to al-Qaida detainees, was charged with mishandling classified information. Yee, an American convert to Islam, quit the Army and the charges were dropped. But two of his Muslim military friends at Gitmo were convicted of espionage-related crimes.

Yee's predecessor at Gitmo was Saifulislam, who was first assigned to the terrorist prison camp after 9/11. While at the Cuban base, the Navy imam privately counseled al-Qaida prisoners in their native tongues of Urdu and Arabic. "I must give hope for them to cope," Saifulislam said at the time.

He set up the diet and prayer regimes for the detainees, recommending they be served halal meals – including traditional dates and lamb – prepared according to Islamic Sharia dietary law. Gitmo detainees can now choose from a menu of 113 Muslim-appropriate meals.

In addition, Saifulislam saw to it that detainees receive copies of the Quran and have access to prayer beads and skull caps. Saifulislam also set up a program to train guards to be more sensitive to the religious customs of their Muslim prisoners. (Sensitivity training is a deceptive Muslim tool to modify or change our culture to Islam; it is not for the purpose of assimilation, understanding or even acceptance.)

West Point bows to MeccaMulticulturalism trumps concerns about Islamist infiltration of our military. Following the Marine's lead, the Army in October dedicated a new mosque at West Point. The U.S. Military Academy's first worship hall for Muslims boasts green carpets, shoe racks and a pulpit facing Mecca. Officials agreed to set up the mosque, large enough for dozens of followers, after Muslim leaders complained that the office where Muslim cadets gathered for Friday prayers had become too crowded.

The Army has been recruiting international cadets from Muslim countries such as Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. Muslim enrollment at the academy in New York has jumped from just two in 2001 to thirty two in 2007.

"We live in a world where everyone is looking at the United States saying, 'You're anti-Islam,'" explained West Point Chaplain Col. John Cook. "But here at West Point, that's not what we do."

The Enemy In Our RanksI hardly think it is anything to boast about but, the U.S. military now boasts more than 10,000 Muslim soldiers and growing every day, many of them black American converts.

On the eve of the Army's push into Iraq, Army Sgt. Hasan Akbar, a black Muslim convert, fragged (meaning he set off a grenade) commanding officers at a military camp in Kuwait. He killed two of them and wounded 15 others. Moreover, this is one of the only attacks of this kind that the alphabet soup media has made front page news, how much of the media do you think that Islam now controls? We know for example that Islam controls the NY Times. Well I want you to know, that Islam does not control de Andréa and Bottom line publishing, no matter how many threats members of CAIR may make.

Akbar, recently convicted of murder and given the death sentence, said at the time he did it out of loyalty to the “Umma”, (The global community of Islam). "You guys (meaning Americans) are coming into our countries, (meaning Islam,)" he said, "and you are raping our women and killing our children.” Within months of Akbar's traitorous 2003 attacks, the Defense Intelligence Agency issued an internal report warning that “Muslim soldiers may pose a possible security threat to the U.S.”, this according to national security reporter Bill Gertz in his new book "Enemies.” Well daaaaa! What do you think was their first clue, and how many clues do you think they need? Moreover, when are they going to do something about connecting these dots?

It was also in 2003 that Yee was accused of spying for the enemy while serving as a Muslim chaplain at Gitmo. Yee was a graduate from West Point, site of the Army's new mosque.

THE BOTTOM LINE: In the 1900’s a U.S. precedent would have been thought of as insane and certainly would have been relieved of his office if he would have not only allowed but promoted the infiltration of our enemy into our military.

Now we look back on the containment of our enemy civilians even immigrant citizens and natural born citizens as well, during the Second WW and we think that Precedent Roosevelt was insane. What seemed appropriate then should be even more appropriate now. To put it into even greater perspective, it would be as if we purposely inducted people who were admitted Nazi’s into our military for the purpose of bringing about our own demise. Insane??? If course it would have been insane, we were fighting for our survival. Today, we are at war with Islam, a people with the same ideology as the Nazis, and yet…well—if I still need to explain, you will never get it will you???

It should be outrageously obvious that promoting the infiltration of our enemy into our own military is nothing short of preposterous. However, it is not---obvious that is. The reason for this insane blindness is the ignorance of who our enemy is. Maybe it is the, “can’t see the forest for the trees” syndrome, or the “anti-American Multiculturalism” religion, or maybe the political correctness brain washing, what ever it is that causes this blindness--by any other color; it is still blindness. In any case, our eyes are closed, our minds are closed, and our spirits are closed. [Western blindness caused by the deception of Islam.]

Moreover, unless we wake up, open our eyes, and our minds [now]…well, as I said, you had better buy a gun and or a portable rug… And oh, -- always be aware of which way east is, because I can guarantee…that” East” is the direction from which your enemy is coming…It could even be the eastern end of your own neighborhood…

de Andréa

Tuesday, January 22, 2008


If you think that America is still the same free nation that our American Forefathers dreamt of, then you haven.t been reading your history book lately. The federal government now says employers MUST hire people who REFUSE to communicate in English or face the consequences. Do you know what fascism is? In this context it is, [you own the business, the government controls it.] This is exactly what is going on in the USA.

By de Andréa
Strange, isn't it... our government has a problem pursuing employers who knowingly hire illegal criminal aliens but has no problem going after law abiding small businesses and nonprofit charitable organizations that simply ask employees to speak English while they're on the clock!

First, liberal elites told us we had to give up our religion, even during Christmas and the rest of the holiday season: Then No prayers in school...No nativity scenes on the town square...No mention of God at high school graduations...Next they told us we had to give up love of our country:

America is racist and sexist...
America coddles the rich and exploits the poor...America is the most dangerous nation in the world...NOW THEY ARE DEMANDING THAT WE GIVE UP OUR LANGUAGE!

That's right! The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is going after a Salvation Army thrift store BECAUSE IT REQUIRED EMPLOYEES TO SPEAK ENGLISH ON THE JOB! The store even gave everyone a year to learn English. Two refused and were fired.

Here's where we're heading:
You go into a shoe store and the clerk does not even know the English word for shoe.
The waiter in a restaurant cannot understand what you're ordering and brings you soft-boiled eggs instead of fried chicken. A worker in a sawmill cuts off your right arm because he does not know the meaning of "STOP!"

This madness is one more consequence of allowing 20 million illegal aliens to pour across our borders unchecked. This time, however, somebody is saying "NO MORE! ENOUGH!"

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) has introduced a bill that -- if passed -- would stop EEOC dead in its tracks.

His bill would "make clear that it is not against federal law for an employer to require employees to speak English on the job."

Since Congress created the EEOC, it has the authority to tell it what to do AND WHAT NOT TO DO!

The EEOC took action against 200 businesses this past year because they simply wished to require their employees to speak English on the job. This campaign of federal government harassment must STOP! Small businesses in America will be wrecked if the EEOC is allowed to enforce this further dismantling of America!

Here is what Senator Alexander says about his bill in a press release.
"A federal agency says it's illegal for an employer to require employees to speak in English, which, in plain English, means that thousands of small businesses in American would have to hire a lawyer and be prepared to make their case to a federal court that there is some special reason to justify speaking English on the job. I believe this is a gross distortion of the Civil Rights Act and a complete misunderstanding of what it means to be an American.” Lest anyone think this bill would force illegal aliens to speak English at all time, Alexander said this; "This bill's not about affecting people's lunch hour or coffee break -- it's about protecting the rights of employers to ensure their employees can communicate with each other and their customers during the working hours. In America, requiring English in the workplace is not discrimination; it's common sense."

In other words, people can speak in Spanish, Arabic, Swahili, or any other language they wish during their personal time (lunch, coffee breaks at home on the street etc). Anyone who says otherwise is either misinformed or lying.

By the way, Alexander originally offered a similar bill as an amendment to the Commerce, Justice and Science (CJS) Appropriations Bill; and it was added to the CJS Appropriations Bill back in June by a vote of 15-14 but the fascist un-American liberal Dem’s squashed it!

A conference committee was to iron out differences between the Senate and House versions and send it to the President. However, the liberals, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, caved in to the advocates of illegal aliens and refused to bring the bill with Alexander's amendment before the conference committee. Instead, the radical and ruthless Pelosi presented an omnibus bill that gutted the amendment. Now Alexander is back with a free-standing bill that says the same thing.

If this bill fails, the EEOC -- and liberals in government -- may declare all-out war against small businesses in America. Maybe it is time to declare all out WAR against these LIBERAL HATE AMERICA DICTATORS.

Given the fact that small business contributes the lion's share of jobs and economic growth in America, this behavior is suicidal.

Press One For English
So how do the American people feel about the English language, as opposed to Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank and Harry Reid and Teddy Kennedy?

According to a recent poll, 80 percent of Americans believe English should be the official language of the nation. Nearly 90 percent believe it is important for immigrants to speak English. More that 75 percent believe employers should have the right to require their employees to speak English while on the job. Yet our own government is actively siding with illegal foreign invaders who REFUSE to even attempt to learn the English language.

How many times a day do you dial your phone and hear: PRESS ONE FOR ENGLISH; PRESS TWO FOR SPANISH, PRESS THREE FOR ARABIC etc? On a personal note, I hang up when I hear that I must choose a language to communicate with in my own country.

Our entire education system in many parts of the country has been changed to accommodate the children of people who speak languages other than English.
A North Texas friend tells us that virtually all the downtown signs in his city of almost 200,000 are now in Spanish.

America is a melting pot...
Where have I heard that before? This is why I said, one must read ones history book. America is no longer a melting pot, where we all melt into one soup called the American culture. It is now a Multi-Cultural society where no one really knows who they are or where they belong. So many of us had parents, grandparents or great-grandparents who came to the United States from another country.

Where there concessions for them?
When Italians immigrated to this country, did America immediately introduce bilingual education into its schools, with math taught in Italian? When others immigrated, did towns and cities all over the country scrap English signs and substitute signs in German or some other language?

Did anyone ever dial a government agency or bank and hear PRESS ONE FOR ENGLISH; PRESS TWO FOR SPANISH, THREE FOR TURKISH or God forbid FOUR FOR ANCIENT ARABIC?

Everyone is supposed to be treated equally in this country.
Teddy Roosevelt had it right when he said: "We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language."

Liberals Say Asking People To Speak English Is "Abusive."
Well I think Liberals are abusive, but at least most of them speak English. Of course some folks think President Teddy Roosevelt was a blow-hard patriot. For example, there's Laura Boston, who works for the Houston Interfaith Worker Justice Center -- an organization whose name tells you it isn't exactly conservative, or patriotic for that matter. Ms. Boston says requiring employees to speak English is "an annoyance tactic" and "just part of the abuse you sometimes get from some employers."

One would have to wonder why employers would go out of their way to annoy their workers -- a tactic that would be bad for production. In an automobile plant you'd be sure to get a few doors on backwards every shift. However, because of a language miscommunication one is liable to get doors on backwards as well, or worse

Obviously Ms. Boston can't understand -- or refuses to understand -- why it would be good for business AND GOOD FOR MORALE if everyone at least attempted to speak the same language.
In fact, it is a good idea for people who wish to live in the United States on a permanent basis to learn English, since fluent English is the key to better jobs and a better life.
Why do I have the feeling the Interfaith Worker Justice Center isn't really interested in that kind of self-improvement?

Just Who Are The Bigots Here?
The EEOC apparently isn't interested in the role that language plays in the life of our nation. The agency would obviously prefer to punish employers than to encourage employees to better themselves.

Columnist Michael M. Bates summarizes the larger role that language plays in our society -- and, for that matter, any society. "Our common language is a basis for our cultural unity. It is far from the only language spoken in the United States, but certainly, it's the primary one. For folks wishing to advance here, knowledge of it is essential. The Obvious question to ask is why are the Liberals trying to keep foreign people in a box, not encouraging them to become part of the American society? Is it just a way to control them as well as make dependents out of them??? Uh, uh.

Those who think of illegal aliens only in terms of economics -- i.e., the benefits they bring to a select segment of America -- should study this paragraph. It reflects the deepest concerns of those of us who successfully fought these same moneygrubbers in the U.S. Senate. (And will do it again if they try to cram amnesty down our throats.)

Let's face it, hindering the adaptation of an immigrant to a new culture only benefits those who seek to EXPLOIT others by creating a permanent underclass in our society... it may benefit some businesses seeking so-called cheap labor... it does benefit liberal politicians who seek more government entitlements and give-aways as well as votes, votes, votes.

We love our country and we want it back -- what is left of it. Moreover, we do not want our government persecuting benevolent organizations like the Salvation Army for requiring employees to learn English.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If this multi-cultural nonsense is allowed to continue we will be as the workers on the tower of Babble. I suppose the more the liberal socialists can keep us confused the more dependent we become, and the more power and control they have. I truly believe this is their agenda…

de Andréa

Use the URL below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax messages to President Bush and the Republican leadership in the House and Senate. Tell them to do everything in their power to pass Senator Lamar Alexander's "Protecting English in the Workplace Act of 2007" IMMEDIATELY.

The EEOC took action against 200 businesses this past year because they simply wished to require their employees to speak English on the job. This campaign of federal government harassment must STOP! Small businesses in America will be wrecked if the EEOC is allowed to enforce this further dismantling of America!
AOL Members Use This Link

Sunday, January 20, 2008

America Begs

President Bush returns from Saudi Arabia after begging and bribing the house of Saud with U.S. weapons, this in exchange for opening the oil valve a little more to drop the price of crude.

By de Andréa

Bush reduced to a beggar
We have just witnessed the humiliating spectacle of a president of the United States begging our enemy, an Islamic potentate to increase our supply of oil while Democrats socialist dictators, who bear the responsibility for the problem, scoff at him as a mendicant groveling at the feet of our enemy, an Islamic self-appointed monarch.

As humiliating as it is for the United States to be put in a position where our economy is held hostage to the enemy of the United States who can make or break our nation simply by limiting their petroleum production, is even more shameful that we have allowed the so-called environmental movement to escape the blame for our predicament.

You are paying exorbitant prices at the gas pump solely because the environmental terrorists and their Democrat allies in Congress have all but shut down our domestic oil production while refusing to allow the exploration and creation of new sources of this resource so vital to our economic health.

While President Bush was left with few if any alternatives to seeking help from the Saudis thanks to our inability to exploit our own untapped oil supply, it is disturbing that instead of demanding that Saudi Arabia act on our behalf by beefing up oil production, we asked them politely to do what they should do without being asked. But they are our enemy and they have us right where they want us, OVER A BARREL… of oil that is…

We have come to the stage in the Jihad of America where we now have been reduced to the sniveling slaves of a people who want us to take our FREEDOM AND GO TO HELL.

Instead of politely saying to the Saudi king, “If possible, your majesty, consider what high prices [of oil] are doing to one of your largest customers,” as he said he would when he met with the king. Instead, the president should have bluntly informed the king: “Hike up production, or from now on you are on your own and at the mercy of al-Qaida.”

George Bush should stand on his bully pulpit and point his finger at Capitol Hill, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and say, “How dare you not give the nation an energy policy? Because you won’t give us an energy policy I have been forced to go the Saudi Arabia, get down on my knees and beg them to give us what you refuse to give us — an adequate supply of reasonably priced oil.”

George Bush should point the finger of blame at Mrs. Pelosi and Sen. Reid and their environmentalist co-conspirators for refusing to enact an energy policy that dictates drilling in ANWR and the Florida Gulf right off our coast— where the Chinese and Cubans are drilling for the huge plentiful supply of oil beneath our seas to their heart’s content.

We should also be harnessing nuclear power, and mining clean coal now locked up for environmental reasons in well over a million acres of land in southwest Utah in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, which contains at least 7 billion tons of coal worth over $1 trillion.

Nobody has died on nuclear-powered aircraft carriers or submarines, and nobody has died in the U.S. because of a nuclear accident.

We cannot exploit nuclear power or drill for oil in ANWR or the Gulf because Democrat members of Congress have been bought and paid for by the second most dangerous terrorists in America, the radical environmentalists.

They have made the Taliban and al-Qaida look like Mother Teresa’s nuns. They have wreaked such havoc here in the U.S. with their terrorist enviro-tactics that the president of the United States is reduced to, begging for oil, and offering a bribe to our enemy, for an already plentiful domestic resource but, thanks to the green people, off-limits to America.

We need a surge here at home to deal with these terrorists. With the Capitol Hill hate America Dictators, they are the American people’s deadliest domestic enemy.

THE BOTTOM LINE: While our enemy Communist China and Communist Cuba suck the oil off our coast, we crawl to Islam the enemy of the world just to get a little drink of what we have plenty of. Thank you enviro-fascists, this is what is called cutting off ones nose to spite ones face. This vanity could be our undoing…

de Andréa

Saturday, January 19, 2008

The Obama Connection

In case you were wondering if or how Barack Hussein Obama is connected to Islam, this may be one such connection.

By de Andrea

Barack Obama’s longtime minister, mentor, and sounding board has been a key supporter of Louis Farrakhan and last month honored the Nation of Islam leader for lifetime achievement.
Farrakhan has repeatedly made hate-filled statements targeting Jews, whites, America, and homosexuals. He has called American whites “blue-eyed devils” and the “anti-Christ.” He has described Jews as “bloodsuckers” who control the government, the media, and some black organizations.

“Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET [the Black Entertainment Network]?” Farrakhan said in a speech on Nov. 11, 2007. “Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry, and television. And they make us look like we’re the murderers; we look like we’re the gangsters, but we’re punk stuff.”
The month after that speech, Obama’s minister and friend, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. and his Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, honored Farrakhan at a gala, bestowing on him its Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Lifetime Achievement Trumpeteer award.

Obama has said he found religion through Wright in the 1980s and consulted him before deciding to run for president. He prayed privately with Wright before announcing his candidacy last year.

In the November/December issue of his church’s magazine, Trumpet, Wright heaped praise on Farrakhan, whom he helped in organizing the Million Man March in Washington in 1995. Wright lauded Farrakhan as one of the giants of the African-American religious experience in the 20th and 21st centuries.
“When Minister Farrakhan speaks, black America listens,” Wright said. “His depth on analysis [sic] when it comes to the racial ills of this nation is astounding and eye-opening. He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest.”

Hailing Farrakhan’s “integrity and honesty,” Wright said, “His love for Africa and African-American people has made him an unforgettable force, a catalyst for change, and a religious leader who is sincere about his faith and his purpose.”

A video quoting some of Wright’s opprobrium’s ran at the gala at the Hyatt Regency Chicago and appears on You Tube. However, while the mainstream media have hammered Mitt Romney over his religion, they have ignored or else downplayed Obama’s ties to Wright. No stories have appeared on Wright’s award to Farrakhan in December.

Wright’s church occupies a brick building at 400 West 95th Street near a public housing project and railroad tracks. Since becoming pastor in 1972, Wright has seen the church’s membership grow from 80 to more than 8,500. The church is the largest congregation in the United Church of Christ, a predominantly white denomination known for its liberal politics. Obama’s church runs an outreach program to attract gay and lesbian singles.

Born in Hawaii, Obama is the son of a white Christian mother from Kansas and a Kenyan father who was a Muslim but was not religious. From age 6 to 10, Obama lived in Indonesia, where he went to a Catholic school. For a year, he went to a public school where he attended Islamic religion classes.

Obama says he found religion and Jesus Christ through Wright, whom he met in the mid-1980s. Obama has been attending Wright’s church regularly since 1988. Wright warned Obama that getting involved with Trinity, with its radical reputation, might turn off other black clergy. Nevertheless, in 1991, Obama joined the church and walked down the aisle in a formal commitment of faith. Wright later married Obama and Michelle Robinson and baptized their two daughters.

The title of Obama’s bestseller “The Audacity of Hope” comes from one of Wright’s sermons. Wright is one of the first people Obama thanked after his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004.
For a Jan. 21, 2007 story in the Chicago Tribune, Obama said that Wright keeps his priorities straight and his moral compass calibrated.

“What I value most about Pastor Wright is not his day-to-day political advice,” Obama told the paper. “He’s much more of a sounding board for me to make sure that I am speaking truthfully about what I believe is possible and that I’m not losing myself in some of the hype and hoopla and stress that is involved in national politics.”

However, Obama has said that in the fall of 2006, he broached the subject of a run for the presidency with Wright, who encouraged him to go ahead.

As noted in a Jan. 7 Newsmax article, “Barack Obama’s Racist Church,” in sermons and interviews, Wright has equated Zionism with racism and has compared Israel with South Africa under its previous policy of apartheid. On the Sunday following 9/11, Wright characterized the terrorist attacks as a consequence of violent American policies. Four years later, Wright suggested that the attacks were retribution for America’s racism.

“In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01,” Wright wrote in Trumpet. “White America and the Western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.”

In one of his sermons, Wright said to thumping applause, “Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run! ...We [in the U.S.] believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.”

In an op-ed in the Philadelphia Tribune, Wright said that war is about “making the world safe” for American business interests. “When one goes against the war, one tampers with the financial institutions and the financial system that was put in place by the Founding Fathers of this country to keep the rich, rich!” he said. “The rich can only stay rich by keeping the poor, poor.”

As for Israel, “The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for over 40 years now,” Wright has said. “Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community and wake up Americans concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”

Those views run parallel to Farrakhan’s, who said in an interview this month with that there will be “no peace for Israel, because there can be no peace as long as that peace is based on lying, stealing, murder, and using God’s name to shield a wicked, unjust practice that is not in harmony with the will of God.”

Just before Obama’s nationally televised campaign kickoff rally last Feb. 10, the candidate disinvited Wright from giving the public invocation. Wright explained: “When [Obama’s] enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli” to visit Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, “a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell.”

According to Wright, Obama then told him, “'You can get kind of rough in the sermons, so what we’ve decided is that it’s best for you not to be out there in public.” Wright is retiring as senior pastor of the church in May. He asked his successor, Otis Moss III, to speak instead, but he declined. However, Obama and his family prayed privately with Wright just before the presidential announcement.

The media blackout on Obama’s radical minister is in striking contrast to the coverage of Romney. Nearly half the references to Romney in the media include a discussion of his membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

If Romney’s church proclaimed on its Web site that it is “unashamedly white,” the media would pounce, and Romney’s presidential candidacy would be over. Yet that is what Obama’s church says on its web site -- except in reverse.

“We are a congregation which is unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian,” says the Trinity United Church of Christ’s Web site. “We are an African people and remain true to our native land, the mother continent, the cradle of civilization.”

Moreover, the church has a “non-negotiable commitment to Africa,” according to its Web site, and the church and its pastor subscribe to what is called the Black Value System.

While the Black Value System encourages commitment to God, education, and self-discipline, it refers to “our racist competitive society” and includes the disavowal of the pursuit of “middle-classness” and a pledge of allegiance to “all black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System.” It defines “middle-classness” as a way for American society to “snare” blacks rather than “killing them off directly” or “placing them in concentration camps,” just as the country structures “an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.”

In two exceptions to the media blackout, Tucker Carlson of MSNBC described Trinity as having a “racially exclusive theology” that “contradicts the basic tenets of Christianity.”

Sean Hannity of Fox News confronted Wright on TV and asked how a black value system is any more acceptable than a white value system. If a white presidential candidate’s church had a similar statement and “you substitute the word black for white, there would be an outrage in this country,” Hannity said. “There would be cries of racism in this country.'”

In response, Wright repeatedly asked Hannity how many books he had read by James Cone and others about black liberation theology. Cone, who is widely admired at Wright’s church, was quoted in the May 29, 2007, issue of The Christian Century as saying, “Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.’ ... Any advice from whites to blacks on how to deal with white oppression is automatically under suspicion as a clever device to further enslavement.”

On a few points, Obama has sought to distance himself from Wright’s teachings or to explain them away. While Wright is his pastor and friend, Obama has said, they do not see eye to eye on everything. Without addressing Wright’s denunciations of Israel and Zionism as racist, Obama has said he “strongly disagrees with any portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that advocates divestment from Israel or expresses anything less than strong support for Israel’s security.”

As for Wright’s repeated comments blaming America for the 9/11 attacks, Obama has said it sounds as if the minister was trying to be “provocative.”

But Obama’s close association with Wright over more than two decades and the minister’s close ties to Farrakhan cannot be explained away so cavalierly. If Obama rejects Wright’s warped view of this country, why does he continue to attend his church? If Obama disagrees with Farrakhan and his anti-Semitic and anti-white statements, why doesn’t he denounce him rather than continue to associate with a minister and friend who is one of his advocates and who gave him an award for lifetime achievement? Does Obama secretly agree with some of their hate-filled, radical statements while publicly avoiding race-specific appeals as part of his candidacy?

That comports with Obama’s habit of not showing up for controversial votes or tackling tough policy issues, allowing him to broaden his appeal through charisma alone. Farrakhan himself recently spoke approvingly of Obama’s strategy, which is crucial to inviting whites to support him.

“Barack Obama has been very careful not to position himself as Rev. Jesse Jackson or Rev. Al Sharpton as a promoter of ‘The Black Cause,’” Farrakhan said in the interview with “He has been groomed, wisely so, to be seen more as a unifier, rather than one who speaks only for the hurt of black people.”

At the least, Obama’s membership in Wright’s church and close ties to Wright himself suggest a lack of judgment and insensitivity to views that are repugnant to the vast majority of Americans who are not bigots or anti-Semites.

That same lack of judgment has shown up in Obama’s gaffes -- threatening to invade Pakistan and offering prompt negotiations with anti-American despots. More frightening, Obama voted last August to give Osama bin Laden and other terrorists the same rights as Americans when it comes to intercepting their overseas calls in order to pick up clues needed to stop another attack.

THE BOTTOM LINE: To evaluate what Obama’s ties to Wright mean, picture America’s reaction if President Bush’s minister, mentor, and moral compass had the views of Wright and was an admirer and supporter of Farrakhan an American Muslim cleric.

Obama may be a gifted orator, but his choice of a friend and advisor suggests he may be masquerading as a Muslim. While the liberal media has already decided Obama will be our next president, Americans may have a different view when they consider what his ties to Wright tell us what the presidential candidate’s true allegiance is.

“He that sleeps with dogs, shall awake with fleas,” Benjamin Franklin

de Andréa