Thursday, December 28, 2017

Can Trump Can Save Western Civilization?

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974) 

 

Can Trump Can Save Western Civilization?

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 28, 2017   


A new year’s resolution

Trump can save Western civilization. Not necessarily because of his policies, but rather, his unorthodox political style may have created a new political reality in which old ideas are being re-examined or even thrown out. While new ideas are being seriously considered, this may be vital to a successful and functional country, and it may just mean the public is ready to have an honest conversation about the effects of Islam on our society.
After 25 years of Middle Eastern studies and Islamic ideology, I have a single mission in this and that is to educate the public about the dangers of Islam and promote people and policies which are effective in working against it. 
Contrary to public opinion, we are not at war with radical Islam or Terrorism. We are at war with the fundamental ideology of Islam itself as taught in the Quran.  I challenge you to get one and read it.
While I hold a wide range of political opinions and loyalties. I feel this strengthens our country and helps us build the broadest possible coalition to defeat Islamic Jihad and the agenda of the world Nation of Islam by infiltration or by force and violence. 
By maintaining partisan neutrality, we Americans are in a unique position to nudge the world one step closer to resolving the international problem of Islamic Jihad that causes so much harm to so many all over the world.
Which brings me back to Trump. The president’s style can be understood through the context of the political philosophy called the “Overton Window.” Formulated by Joe Overton in the 1990s, the theory maintains that there is an acceptable range of politically viable ideas on any given issue, framed by the range of ideas held by the public. For example, discussions of taxes mostly focus on raising or lowering existing taxes and essentially tinkering with the current system. Rarely do you hear a politician proposing something genuinely fundamental, like abolishing the illegal and unconstitutional income tax altogether and replacing it with something like a flat sales tax of 15%. This is because the idea is too unusual, untested and novel for most people to be willing to consider.
“So, if a think tank’s research and the principles of sound policy suggest a particular idea that lies outside the Overton window, what is to be done? “Shift the window,Nathan Russell wrote for the MacKinac Institute in an essay explaining the Overton window. “Since commonly held ideas, attitudes and presumptions frame what is politically possible and create the ‘window,’ a change in the opinions held by politicians and the people in general will shift it. Move the window of what is politically possible and those policies previously impractical can become the next great popular and legislative rage.”
Trump has been a brick through that window.
Among other things, he has triggered a cultural moment where people are now discussing issues like Islamic Jihad in an open candid way for the first time in decades.
Trump can save the West by reigniting that most important ingredient in a functional society: THE ENGAGED CITIZEN.
THE BOTTOM LINE: My new year’s resolution is, among general truth and freedom: In 2018, I intend to use this opportunity to keep speaking about the dangers of Islam, and tap into a public that is ready to look at a new approach, and a real honest solution to this on-going global challenge. One only needs to look at the effects of Islam on Europe to understand that we as Americans certainly do not want that here.
What about you??? 
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Reminiscent Of The Grisly Nazi Era

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Reminiscent Of The Grisly Nazi Era

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 27, 2017   


Warning: This is graphically described.

Has the world returned to the caveman barbarism of prehistoric epochs, or have we just exceeded the inhumanity of Adolph Eichmann?   Or maybe we have just gone MAD!

You can now display the head of a human baby on your wall right next to your deer or bears head.  And that’s not all, you can have a purse or a leather jacket made from the skin of murdered human babies.  Is this really progress! If it is, then please stop the world, I want to get off!

Big business in the sale of human baby organ’s and other parts…
A biotech firm has been caught selling the heads of murdered babies. Undercover agents on behalf of the Reuters news agency engaged in transactions to purchase the heads of those babies. Officials find the little bodies of four aborted babies in its warehouse.

A grisly case coming out of the Islamic state of Michigan is once again putting the spotlight on the sale of murdered baby parts.

As part of the news agency’s examination of the industry, for example, a Reuters reporter was able to purchase two human heads and a cervical spine from Restore Life USA, a broker based in U.S. Representative Marsha Blackburn’s home state of Tennessee. The deals were struck after just a few emails, at a cost of $900 plus shipping.

Once officials were alerted, the biotech firm’s warehouse was raided. There, officials found the intact bodies of four additional aborted children.

Confidential photographs (that I will not show here) reviewed by Reuters show that Federal agents discovered four preserved dead children in the Detroit warehouse of a man who sold human body parts. The dead babies were found during a December 2013 raid of businessman Arthur Rathburn’s warehouse. The babies, which appear to have been in their second trimester, were submerged in a liquid that included human brain tissue.
In four of the photos, a crime scene investigator in a hazmat suit uses forceps to lift a different fetus from the brownish liquid. In three other photos, a marker that includes a government evidence identification number lies beside a fetus.

The firm is ironically known as ‘Restore Life’ and its website indicates that it works very closely with universities to provide them with cadavers for research. But the investigation by Reuters makes it clear that the biotech firm moved beyond cadavers to engage in the mass sale of parts from children who may have been purposely killed for body part trafficking.


The extensive Reuters news report brings to mind the shocking discoveries of the sales of aborted baby parts by the ‘Planned Parenthood Murder Incorporated’ and other mass murder companies. Although the sale of body parts from aborted babies is technically illegal the law is very convoluted and Planned Parenthood likely did its best to make its actions appear as legal as possible — although the sales of aborted baby parts is clearly unethical.
Members of Congress are very concerned about the discoveries and their implications.
“This needs to be reviewed,” said U.S. Representative Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee who recently chaired a special U.S. House committee on the use of human fetal tissue.
Blackburn recoiled when a Reuters reporter showed her some of the photographs, taken by government officials involved in the raid.

“The actions depicted in these photos are an insult to human dignity,” said U.S. Representative Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. A Republican from Virginia, Goodlatte said that “if individuals violate federal laws and traffic in body parts of unborn children for monetary gain, they should be held accountable.”

Planned Parenthood has generally not been held accountable for its actions, though two companies that sold aborted baby parts for the nation’s biggest abortion company have been forced to close down.

And if that is not enough to cause one to want to move to another planet, there doesn’t seem to be any limit to this barbaric insanity.

Human Leather Products Now Being Sold Online

Through the course of perusing the news as usual, one particular story stood out as disgusting but I consider a sign of our times.
This is not a mistake nor is it a hoax my friendThe website Human Leather Co UK can be accessed here. 
Extremely discerning clientele can now purchase their own one-of-a-kind ‘human leather’ products such as wallets, belts, and shoes online but prices start at $14,000 USD, according to the company which handcrafts the items out of the ‘finest leather known.’
That’s right, you can now order your very own wallet or belt made from a previously living human being despite the fact that human leather, much like certain fur, is illegal. [emphasis added]
The company/website “HumanLeather.co.uk” boasts about their “exclusive real human leather products” online.
Welcome to ][umanLeather. We are specialists in producing exquisite and exclusive products for an extremely discerning clientele.  All products are carefully hand-crafted by experienced master craftsmen, with years of experience in handling the finest leather known - human leather. 
We only craft the best and most beautiful products out of our unique leather.  We have produced bespoke items for some of our clients, but due to the limited size of the lengths that we work with, we are limited to what items we can fashion out of the leather. 
Why are your products so expensive?
We cater to a small but highly discerning clientele.  They are amongst those lucky few who have everything they could possibly desire.  Our supply is restricted and we prefer to keep it that way as we are the only firm in the world that crafts these special products.
When navigating around the site, errors are encountered when trying to view the "home" page and the "About" page.  The site is registered to a Non-UK individual named Vatsyayana Kama.  When this name is searched, the results produced are strange, indicating this may not be a real person.  The results produce listings for "The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana," "Vatsyayana – an Indian philosopher who lived in the second century AD, and books on "The Kama Sutra."  This is very telling indeed.
While they claim to have individuals willing to "donate" material for their production, and have turned some "donors" away citing "we can accept only the highest quality human skin."  How would that be determined?  Now, does anyone actually believe this "company" gets their "material" from donors?  It's hard to even contemplate that anyone would "donate" their body to have their skin made into "human" leather products.  Wouldn’t the “highest quality human skin” come only from babies???
Walking around decked out in human leather shoes, belt and wallet since it brings with it the comparison of the movies' portrayal of indigenous Amazon peoples walking around with shrunken heads on their belts or the taxidermied heads of human babies like trophies on a wall.  Once that vision is placed on the back burner, one has to question what kind of inhuman people are these, where is the investigation into this company?  The site was registered in 2008.  With all the surveillance of individuals worldwide and internet traffic, why hasn't any law enforcement agency come forward with an announcement on an investigation?
In an article appearing in October of 2013 on the site dailydot.com, the author states, "Books bound in human skin are a staple of horror movies, and there are even a few kicking around in real life. One tends to assume that the practice has pretty much died out, but it hasn’t, at least because it is (or should be) illegal." 
THE BOTTOM LINE: It is enough to throw one into a temporary cognitive dissonance when looking at this site on the web.  Is there anything anymore disgusting after murdering innocent babies in or outside the womb than this? Yes there is, the merchandizing of human baby body parts.
One has to face the pure evil of this company producing this type of product.  It shows there are no moral boundaries when it comes to making money.
Some people of this world have devolved and degenerated into something worse than animals, so far there is no hope for them without Jesus Christ.  To the people making this product, and those who would even contemplate a purchase such as this, Shame on you!  Ask for salvation, forgiveness and repent of your sins. And, law enforcement agencies, such as Scotland Yard and Interpol, needs to investigate this company to determine if any crimes have been committed in addition to dealing in an illegal product.
After signing the petition above, please write your congressman here and ask them to put a stop to this insanity.
Note: This article has been sent to Scotland Yard and the Metropolitan Police London UK   new.scotland.yard@met.police.uk
I would also like to suggest that you use the email address above and also send a message to Scotland Yard asking them why they have aloud this kind of insanity of HUMAN LEATHER to continue since 2008.  
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Monday, December 25, 2017

A Real American Law Abiding Hero

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


A Real American Law Abiding Hero

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 25, 2017   



Once in a great while - we discover a real American. The kind of American the Framers had in mind.  A Constitutional American, the kind that built this country of prosperity and morality. The independent American capable of independent thought. The kind that fought for our independence from European oppression in the 1770’s. How many are left? Can you count them on your fingers and toes?

Well there is at least one left, and he lives in Texas.  Stephen Willeford a local man who shot the Texas church shooter and then he chased after the gunman.

Stephen Willeford, a resident of Sunderland Springs, was at home when his daughter came to his bedroom and told him that she heard gunshots coming from the First Baptist Church nearby.

“I kept hearing the shots, one after another, very rapid shots – just ‘pop pop pop pop’ and I knew every one of those shots represented someone, that it was aimed at someone, that they weren’t just random shots,” Willeford said.

A former NRA instructor, Willeford decided to load his rifle while his daughter scouted the situation outside. She told him that he saw a man in black tactical gear firing at the church. So Willeford, without even putting on his shoes, grabbed his firearm and ran across the street to the church to confront the shooter.


“He saw me and I saw him,” Willeford said. “I was standing behind a pickup truck for cover.” The pair exchanged gunfire.

“I know I hit him,” Willeford said. “He got into his vehicle, and he fired another couple rounds through his side window. When the window dropped, I fired another round at him again.”

Although he shot the gunman, later identified as 26-year-old Devin Kelley, he decided to flee the scene and speed down the highway.

Willeford spotted his friend Johnnie Langendorff in his pickup truck at a stop sign. He ran over and asked him for help.

“That guy just shot up the Baptist church. We need to stop him,” Willeford told Johnnie.
“I was strictly just acting on what’s the right thing to do,” Langendorff told reporters earlier Monday, according to the Associated Press.


As they drove after the shooter the pair called 911 to give a description of the assailant. Eventually, they caught up to Kelley’s truck, who had run into a road sign and flipped his truck into a ditch.

Willeford cautiously exited his truck and yelled, “get out of the truck, get out of the truck, but did not see any movement”, he said. Police later arrived to the scene. Kelley opted to take the cowards way out and committed suicide.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Willeford insists that he’s not a hero. “I think my God, my Lord protected me and gave me the skills to do what needed to be done,” he said.

When the dust had settled, officials revealed that Kelley killed 26 people in the rampage, the largest mass shooting in Texas history.

It’s too bad the church itself was a GUN FREE ZONE or maybe so many wouldn’t have died.  But it’s interesting what happens when at least a neighbor obeys constitutional law and “keeps and bears arms.”  I wonder when the State and Federal Governments are going to begin obeying the law as well - and put a stop to all this defenseless killing.
Did you know that all mass shootings take place in GUN FREE ZONES

Constitutional law requires that we be an armed nation…It’s “Necessary for the security of a Free State.” Read it for yourself and you too will see that the Government is in violation of the law. “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Well it’s been infringed my friend. That’s why all the kids died at Sandy Hook. It too - was a GUN FREE ZONE.


How about your’ kids…or your’ church?

Do you know the truth about people killed by guns? Probably not. So I am going to shock you, so if you have a bad heart don’t read this, or look these up.  So far 'this year' 1000 people have been killed with guns in the city of Chicago.  Chicago is a city that has a virtual gun ban. In other words a GUN FREE CITY, no guns in Chicago.  You can’t even buy a gun in Chicago.  OK, now hang on to your GUN FREE ZONE SIGN because…first, on average, there are approximately 12000 people killed by guns in the entire country per year.  Now! As I said if you have a weak heart don’t read this… From 2011 to 2016 that’s five years my friend in the entire state of Vermont 420 people died of gun shots...Total. That’s an average of 84 people a year for 5 years in the entire state. Why is’ that, you should ask? Answer: because the state of Vermont doesn’t have any gun laws. None, ziltch, noda.  You can carry a loaded gun down main street Vermont, and people do. So the crazies steer clear of Vermont. And as you can see, I didn’t make this up.

So now go buy yourself a gun for CHRISTMAS.  Remember what Jesus said "But now," he said, "take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!” Luke 22:36.

And I’ say…”if you have a Bible look it up!” I didn’t make that up either…

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Saturday, December 23, 2017

The Unconstitutional BLM And the Tyranny of the Courts

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


The Unconstitutional BLM And the Tyranny of the Courts

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 23, 2017   



A Federal court in Nevada recently declared a mistrial in the Cliven Bundy Case. Did you read that right? Not a dismissal but a mistrial! In other words the ‘Federal Kangaroo Courts’ can try this trumped-up illegal case again! They likely won’t…but…

Since from nearly the beginning of the 21 Century one of the many totally Illegal and unconstitutional Federal Departments, called the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) which also illegally has its own military,  has attacked harassed and eventually incarcerated members of the Nevada Bundy family just because they could.

The false philosophy here - is that Government Officials seem to believe that the U.S. Government is a separate ‘Jackbooted Gestapo Entity’ from the People.  When in fact the ‘People’ are’ the Government.  The misguided philosophy of the BLM is that they, and they alone, own more than 28 percent of the land in the United States, not the ‘People’. 

Note the map below:
The red is what the BLM claims sovereign authority over. The truth is that they illegally stole most of it from the people and the states. Take note that the earlier states in the east and Midwest are only sparsely owned by the Federal Government, mostly because as Clause 17 of Article I, Section 8 states it can only own land needed to run the government. And Article IV sec. 3 clearly states that it cannot own land within the borders of the many states, except what Article I Section allows. This is why they own very little of the eastern and Midwestern states.   But as time passed and the country grew west, the Government evolved into a power land grabbing entity.

Although the BLM wasn’t created until 1946 by combining two existing agencies: the General Land Office and the Grazing Service, the agency now illegally possess and manages the federal government's nearly 700 million acres of state land.  The Federal government began acquiring land from Spain France and other countries as early as the 1780’s.  And except for the Homestead Act of 1862 (that is by the way still in effect but nearly impossible to take advantage of) and the few sales of land to individuals by the government, and as more and more of the acquired Territory in the West became states the Federal Government illegally retained authority over much, and is some cases, most of the land mass.



Note: That white spot at the most southern tip of Nevada…that’s Bundy Land.  And as you can see, except for a little land along Interstate 80 in the north, nearly the entire state of Nevada is stolen land by the government B-L-M military! 

So, what is the law, first regarding the Federal Government owning land and second, creating new unconstitutional departments and arbitrarily expanding government power?

First Let us go to Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution which states:

“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;”

Clause 17 of Article I, Section 8 deals with the issue that the Constitutional Framers had agreed that the new nation’s capital should be located in a district that was independent of any particular state government and subject only to federal control. Thus the plan was to create a federal district no more than ten miles square from land ceded by one or more states to house the U.S. national capital, which was accomplished when the Compromise of 1790 ended with agreement to form the District of Columbia from landed ceded by Maryland and Virginia. The national capital was temporarily relocated from New York to Philadelphia while construction began on homes for the president and Congress, and in 1800 the United States’ capital was moved again (for the final time) to Washington, D.C., in December 1800.

“Clause 17” allows Congress to exercise exclusive control over that federal district, and over any land and structures that are deemed necessary for carrying on the business of the Federal Government (such as forts, arsenals, and post offices).

Then let’s go to article IV sec. 3 of the Constitution which states:

“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or ‘*other Property’ belonging to the United States ...”

This section of the Constitution grants Congress the power to make needful rules and regulations while the land is still a Territory (capital T) and grants Congress the power to dispose of the land. It does not grant unto congress the power to retain the land, only to dispose of it. This means that the federal government does not and cannot OWN land except what is a Territory and what is stated in (Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17.) They can make the rules while it is a Territory, but they only have the obligation, duty and authority to dispose of it.  In other words, the people OWN the land and have charged the Federal government to be administrators until it can be disposed of.

*“The other property” mentioned in Article IV sec. 3 refers to the property in Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17 which is the property in Washington DC and other property needed to run the government such as federal buildings, arsenals, military bases, etc.

 So how does Congress dispose of Territorial land?  It can and has been done in several ways: they can sell it, they can give it away (such as they did with the Homestead Act), but the ultimate tool of disposal however, is Statehood. The land is no longer a Territory…   By accepting a State into the Union, Congress is disposing (relinquishing its rights) of the land/Territory to the people of that particular State. At the moment of Statehood, The Federal Government no longer has the constituted authority to administrate the land or resources within the borders of that State. The people of that state now have all authority over the land in that state.  

This is U.S. Constitutional Law ‘my friend’ moreover it has evolved, been ignored and/or manipulated to suit those in power nearly since its inception.  This is what the Oregon and the Nevada Bundy standoff was really about my friend. It wasn’t about cattle, tortoises, unpaid rent or the environment, it was about government tyranny plain and simple.  Only the one who owns the land can rent it out or have any kind of authority over it, and that is the people or the state in which the land is located.

Then there is the little issue of illegal departments and powers of the Federal government such as in this case the BLM that expanded the power of the Department of the Interior and evolved into a Gestapo Military. There are over 7000 such unconstitutional departments now in the Federal Government.  

I refer you to the 10th Amendment:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The 10th Amendment the most violated amendment of all of the Bill of Rights, expresses the principle of federalism and states' rights, which strictly supports the entire plan of the original Constitution for the United States of America, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people.  

THE BOTTOM LINE: Again I Challenge anyone to find in the U.S. Constitution that the Federal Government has the power to establish a department that is essentially a corporate entity that owns and controls land and mineral rights in some cases up to 80 percent of state land. 
If you want to read the details of the latest development and a little background in the Bundy V.s. the BLM case, in the ‘OREGONIAN’ you can click on this.

Read past related articles here:

And Here:

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.