“Better to write for
yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)
The
Unconstitutional BLM And the Tyranny of the Courts
Opinion Editorialist for
Posted December 23, 2017
Clause 17 of Article I, Section 8 deals with the issue that the Constitutional
Framers had agreed that the new nation’s capital should be located in a
district that was independent of any particular state government and subject
only to federal control. Thus the plan was to create a federal district no more
than ten miles square from land ceded by one or more states to house the U.S.
national capital, which was accomplished when the Compromise of 1790
ended with agreement to form the District of Columbia from landed ceded by
Maryland and Virginia. The national capital was temporarily relocated from New
York to Philadelphia while construction began on homes for the president and
Congress, and in 1800 the United States’ capital was moved again (for the final
time) to Washington, D.C., in December 1800.
“Clause 17” allows Congress to exercise exclusive control over that federal district, and over any land and structures that are deemed necessary for carrying on the business of the Federal Government (such as forts, arsenals, and post offices).
Then there is the little issue of illegal departments and powers of the
Federal government such as in this case the BLM that expanded the power of the
Department of the Interior and evolved into a Gestapo Military. There are over
7000 such unconstitutional departments now in the Federal Government.
I refer you to the 10th Amendment:
The 10th Amendment the
most violated amendment of all of the Bill of Rights, expresses the principle
of federalism and states' rights, which strictly supports the entire plan of the
original Constitution for the United States of America, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the
United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or
the people.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Again I Challenge anyone to find in the U.S. Constitution that the Federal Government has the power to establish a department that is essentially a corporate entity that owns and controls land and mineral rights in some cases up to 80 percent of state land.
If you want to read the details of the latest development and a little background in the Bundy V.s. the BLM case, in the ‘OREGONIAN’ you can click on this.
Read past related articles here:
And Here:
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
The
Unconstitutional BLM And the Tyranny of the Courts
By de Andréa
‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’
Posted December 23, 2017
A Federal court in
Nevada recently declared a mistrial in the Cliven Bundy Case. Did you read that
right? Not a dismissal but a mistrial! In other words the ‘Federal Kangaroo
Courts’ can try this trumped-up illegal case again! They likely won’t…but…
Since from nearly
the beginning of the 21 Century one of the many totally Illegal and
unconstitutional Federal Departments, called the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) which also illegally has its own military, has attacked harassed and eventually incarcerated
members of the Nevada Bundy family just because they could.
The false
philosophy here - is that Government Officials seem to believe that the U.S.
Government is a separate ‘Jackbooted Gestapo Entity’ from the People. When in fact the ‘People’ are’ the
Government. The misguided philosophy of
the BLM is that they, and they alone, own more than 28 percent of the land in
the United States, not the ‘People’.
Note the map below:
The red is what the
BLM claims sovereign authority over. The truth is that they illegally stole most
of it from the people and the states. Take note that the earlier states in the east
and Midwest are only sparsely owned by the Federal Government, mostly because
as Clause
17 of Article I, Section 8 states it can only own land needed to run the
government. And Article
IV sec. 3 clearly states that it cannot own land within the borders of the many
states, except what Article I Section allows. This is why they own very little
of the eastern and Midwestern states. But as time passed and the country grew west,
the Government evolved into a power land grabbing entity.
Although the BLM
wasn’t created until 1946 by combining two
existing agencies: the General Land Office and the Grazing Service, the agency now illegally possess and manages the federal government's nearly
700 million acres of state land. The
Federal government began acquiring land from Spain France and other countries
as early as the 1780’s. And except for
the Homestead Act of 1862 (that is by the way still in effect but nearly
impossible to take advantage of) and the few sales of land to individuals by
the government, and as more and more of the acquired Territory in the West
became states the Federal Government illegally retained authority over much,
and is some cases, most of the land mass.
Note: That white spot at the most southern tip of Nevada…that’s Bundy Land.
And as you can see, except for a little
land along Interstate 80 in the north, nearly the entire state of Nevada is stolen
land by the government B-L-M military!
So, what is the law, first regarding the Federal Government
owning land and second, creating new unconstitutional departments and arbitrarily
expanding government power?
“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular
States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of
the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by
the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the
Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful
Buildings;”
“Clause 17” allows Congress to exercise exclusive control over that federal district, and over any land and structures that are deemed necessary for carrying on the business of the Federal Government (such as forts, arsenals, and post offices).
Then let’s go to article IV sec.
3 of the Constitution which states:
“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or ‘*other Property’ belonging
to the United States ...”
This section of the Constitution
grants Congress the power to make needful rules and regulations while the land
is still a Territory (capital T) and grants Congress the power to dispose of
the land. It does not grant unto congress the power to retain
the land, only
to dispose of it. This means that the federal government does not
and cannot OWN land except what is a Territory and what is stated in (Article 1
Section 8 Clause 17.) They can make the rules while it is a Territory, but they
only have the obligation, duty and authority to dispose of it. In other
words, the people OWN the land and have charged the Federal government to be
administrators until
it can be disposed of.
*“The other property” mentioned in Article IV sec. 3 refers
to the property in Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17
which is the property in Washington DC and other property needed to run the
government such as federal buildings, arsenals, military bases, etc.
So how does Congress dispose of Territorial land? It can and has been done in several ways:
they can sell it, they can give it away (such as they did with the Homestead Act),
but the ultimate tool of disposal however, is Statehood. The land is no longer a Territory… By
accepting a State into the Union, Congress is
disposing (relinquishing its rights) of the land/Territory to the people of
that particular State. At the moment
of Statehood, The Federal Government no longer has the constituted authority to
administrate the land or resources within the borders of that State. The people of that state now have all authority over the land
in that state.
This is U.S. Constitutional Law ‘my
friend’ moreover it has evolved, been ignored and/or manipulated to suit those
in power nearly since its inception.
This is what the Oregon and the Nevada Bundy standoff was really about
my friend. It wasn’t about cattle, tortoises, unpaid rent or the environment,
it was about government tyranny plain and simple. Only the one who owns the land can rent it out
or have any kind of authority over it, and that is the people or the state in
which the land is located.
I refer you to the 10th Amendment:
“The
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: Again I Challenge anyone to find in the U.S. Constitution that the Federal Government has the power to establish a department that is essentially a corporate entity that owns and controls land and mineral rights in some cases up to 80 percent of state land.
If you want to read the details of the latest development and a little background in the Bundy V.s. the BLM case, in the ‘OREGONIAN’ you can click on this.
Read past related articles here:
And Here:
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
-
de Andréa
Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment