Saturday, June 30, 2007

California State education chief pushes “gay porn fest”

California State education chief pushes “gay porn fest” on your children

A Ca Board member calls this issue an 'in your face' problem

The war continues…

By de Andréa

In my previous article I briefly mentioned this perversion of education promoted by the homosexual community in the State of California with the support of Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell. Under Superintendent O’Connell’s supervision, hundreds of thousands of your children are being “educated”/indoctrinated, brainwashed and perverted. O’Connell has misused his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to praise a "gay" pride event that has been used in the past to expose your children to sexually explicit activities.

Priscilla Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District governing board, who cares about academics and the success of all students said, I want to know how Mr. O'Connell's letter has anything to do with public education and instruction.

"I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would advocate an in your face event where diversity is not just being celebrated, but where pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and innocent children of our communities," she said.

O'Connell's letter to Mike Karim, of the San Diego LGBT Gay Pride, the text of the letter reads..."It is with great pleasure that I offer my support for the 2007 celebration of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Awareness Festival. I am truly honored to recognize an endeavor that promotes equality and respect in our communities. Thanks for the group's efforts to celebrate diversity and a sense of humanity among individuals while encouraging them to value each other's rights and privileges as members of society." A copy of the leter is posted below.

James Hartline, who publishes the James Hartline Report that monitors homosexual activists in the region, said the letter is "insidious." "O'Connell is the head guy for the public schools. Gay pride has absolutely nothing to do with his job, yet he used his state letterhead to issue an endorsement.” He said the "gay" pride event in question, features sadomasochism, triple-X rated pornography, and nude men. "He's saying this is great for the community. and he is the one responsible for setting down policy for elementary school children," Hartline said.

"Charged with the responsibility to be the chief spokesman for California's public schools, O'Connell plays one of the most significant roles in the lives of millions of small children in America's most populated state," Hartline continued. "Using public funds to send out a letter to endorse an event that features XXX rated pornography, and explicit S&M leather sex venue, and the distribution of condoms and lubricants used in anal homosexual intercourse, demonstrates that Superintendent O'Connell should now be considered one of the most dangerous men in all of California.” Moreover he should be arrested for contributing to the distribution of porn to Children.

Hartline noted the San Diego "Gay" Pride event already has experienced a number of controversies. In 2005, it was learned the group had hired sex offenders to work with various events, including a registered pedophile who was working in the event's "Children's Garden."
Then in 2006, numerous small children were marched in the parade under the banner of a local charter school. "O'Connor's letter includes a shocking display of disrespect for families who are doing everything possible to protect their children from child molesters, the pornography industry, and sexually transmitted diseases," Hartline said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If this information doesn’t cause one to immediately pull one’s child from public school, then I can only determine that parents just don’t care. One can either enroll them in a private school where one still has input as to the type of curriculum that is taught, or one could consider home schooling. If parents would make this simple move the Department of education would have to listen because schools would lose their funds. It’s the old “hit them in the pocket book trick”. Take the reins, the government horse is pulling your children over a cliff, you are in charge, not the bureaucracy.
Question...When are Heterosexuals going to have a parade???

de Andréa

A copy of the letter from Superintendent John O’Connell to Mike Karim of “Gay Pride” in San Diego, sorry for the poor quality.

Friday, June 29, 2007

Homosexuals are a freak of nature

Homosexuals are a freak of nature say school officials, Parents, doctors, ex-'gays' protest against student curriculum.

The war continues…

By de Andréa

The Montgomery County Board of Education in Maryland has seemed to accomplish what science has been unable to validate, simply by declaring in its newly prepared school curriculum for children that some babies are born homosexual. Of course this is exactly what the homosexual community claims. They claim that they are born homosexual, and therefore they are what they are.

Parents are appealing the decision, and rightly so and former homosexuals are claiming discrimination due to the decision by the school board to pilot a controversial new sex education curriculum against the advice of hundreds of practicing physicians in the county. I find it very interesting that if homosexuality is a birth defect and therefore cannot be changed, that there are in fact former homosexuals.

Developed by its own staff, the educational materials were given a test run in six schools in the county at the 8th to 10th grade levels. They are supposed to be implemented in all schools soon.

Since the decision this passed January; the school board has experienced a barrage of criticism. A strong opponent of the curriculum is Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, a non-profit Maryland-based group formed in response to the board's decision. According to its website, the group believes in the parental right to have "ultimate authority to guide the moral direction of their children without interference by an increasingly perverted public school system."

Another organization leading the charge against the curriculum, "Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays," recently released a statement that, "According to the American Psychiatric Association, there are no replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological cause for homosexuality. But despite that, the Montgomery County Board of Education has done what science and medicine could not do, by simply emulating the homosexual communities claim in its newly prepared curriculum that homosexuality is 'innate' or inborn."

Brainwashing confuses people because it has no foundation:

The new junior high textbook includes a definition of innate, from the 2006 edition of the Merriam Webster's Dictionary as meaning "determined by factors present in an individual from birth.” The curriculum then instructs teachers to "Say to students, 'Sexual orientation is innate and a complex part of one's personality." But the same text contradicts itself later when asking, "What causes sexual orientation?

Parents and doctors object to the text as inaccurate, unscientific, and discriminatory. The board received an objection to the material signed by more than 270 practicing physicians in Montgomery County, stating the information in the curriculum was inaccurate and possibly dangerous to students on the grounds that among other psychoilogical damages, does not disclose health risks associated with homosexual behavior.

There have been a number of cases in which so-called educators have been shown to be promoting a homosexual lifestyle to children. Again they are confused, how can a lifestyle that is supposed to be innate, be promoted??? Again this happens when brainwashing and indoctrination replaces education.
An example is California:

Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell, under whose supervision hundreds of thousands of children are being brainwashed, and has used his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to praise a "gay pride” event that has been used in the past to expose children to sexually explicit activities.

That drew vehement objections from several, including Priscilla Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District governing board. "I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would advocate an event where diversity is not just being celebrated but where pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and innocent children of our communities," she said.

Officials in Boulder, Colo., held a seminar for students where they were told to "have sex," including same-sex experiences, and "take drugs."

Other school events promoted homosexuality to students while banning parents.

An official ordered their 14-year-old freshman class into a "gay" indoctrination seminar after having them sign a confidentiality agreement promising not to tell their parents.

THE BOTTOM LINE: First off I’d have to say that something smells like perversion in our Government "controlled" public school system.

Moreover, as in most perverted issues there is a thread of commonality and that is irresponsibility, which is always demonstrated in the attempt to conceal the truth. This is done by first misidentifying the issue, the perversion of truth is promoted as such.

Some examples are:
Identifying illegal aliens as undocumented citizens, abortion as a right to choose or pro-choice, an anti-gun organization as anti-crime, or a gun safety group. Homosexuals hide behind the identification of “Gay” (it use to mean merry, bright, or lively) as well as insisting that homosexuality is something they are born with and therefore they have no choice, and thus relieving themselves of the responsibility of that choice.

This perversion of our schools is further proof that this way of promoting lies, actually works. Our so-called educational system has obviously bought into these lies like white on rice. Moreover, this type of "modern education" is brainwashing the next generation with perversion. Can you imagine if this is allowed to continue, what this country will be like in 20 years when these brainwashed children of perversion grow up and are in charge? Sodom and Gomorra or the Roman Empire wouldn’t hold a candle to it…

de Andréa

Thursday, June 28, 2007

'Homosexual' activists say, 'We will BURY you'

Threats are made against Christian workers who oppose homosexual agenda
The war continues...

By de Andréa

Ben Patrick Johnson, a Heterophobic board member for Equality California has come out against the Bible-based Capitol Resource Institute, which works on behalf of family and Biblical moral values in California, especially among its lawmakers.

"If you continue your efforts, we will BURY you," said an e-mail from Ben Patrick Johnson, to his "colleagues" at the CRI, according to a statement from the Christian organization. I wonder if they are going to bury us after they kill us, or before. Either way it sure sounds like a threat of war to me.

"For a group that purports to expand tolerance and civil rights, Equality California is not practicing what it preaches," CRI said.

Johnson threatens “we have every intention of your group going down, as have others who oppose our human (homosexual special) rights.”

It is shameful that a group that represents itself as promoting tolerance and civil rights would stoop to the very tactics it accuses CRI of using. Not once has CRI personally attacked opponents in such a degrading and vicious manner," said a representative of the organization. Moreover, neither am I; I am simply fighting back in self defence.

"In a video diatribe against CRI posted on his website, Johnson declares that CRI and its supporters are 'hate peddlers' and 'conservative, religious prejudice peddlers.’ He further declares that we are 'smirky, self-righteous folks' who have 'launched an aggressive campaign against legislation to protect homosexual youth in California's and ultimately in all America's schools.’ This statement reveals not only the vitriolic language this supposed 'tolerance' group uses, but also the true agenda behind such legislation as SB 777.

SB 777 is a plan that would require all public schools in California to eliminate anything that could in any way reflect "adversely" on the homosexual lifestyle choice.

It would mean for example, the words "mom" and "dad" would be banned from school text books and from being used as depicting a normal life style. It is a plan much like the California Assembly approved a year ago, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it.

This group of heterophobic mutants are bent on not only getting the rest of society to swallow special homosexual rights but these hederophobes plan on abolishing as many rights as they can for the rest of the country.

"As you can see, CRI is up against radical, aggressive Heterophobic hate mongers. To be spewing such hateful, inflammatory rhetoric indicates that they are fearful of the truth that CRI communicates to the people of California and the rest of America. We should be crystal clear in response to the outrageous accusation that we want homosexual youth to be 'abused and degraded.’ CRI believes that all children should be protected from violence in their schools. That is why it is essential to restore discipline and order in our classrooms. Pushing radical social experimentation will only perpetuate intolerance and violence.” Moreover the threat “WE WILL BURY YOU” requires an act of violence, should I [we] prepare to defend my [our] self [s].

The e-mail from Johnson, according to CRI, said:
"Dear colleagues at the Capitol Resource Institute, "I am a firm supporter of freedom of speech, and therefore I support yours, even if it in direct contrast with my own. However, we all use the media and the internet to spread our message: and with no hubris intended, I advise you -- if you continue your efforts, WE WILL BURY YOU ... with public opinion, with media, and ultimately with legislation. EQCA passed NINE bills last year to protect basic dignities and we have every intention of your group going down, as have others who oppose our human rights.”

An earlier description of SB 777 from CRI noted that it "forcibly thrusts young school children into dealing with sexual issues, requiring that homosexuality, bi-sexuality, and trans-sexuality be taught in a favorable light. Pushing this radical homosexual agenda in California schools will stifle the truth in favor of political correctness and will inevitably conflict with the religious, moral convictions and free speech of both students and parents," said CRI Executive Director Karen England. "The full ramifications of this sweeping legislation could affect the entire nation as most textbook companies tailor their material to their number one purchaser: California."

THE BOTTOM LINE: This type of language brings too mind images of the Communist leader Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the podium of the United Nations when he declared that Communism would bury America. The irony is not lost on us – Communists squelch all opposing speech, just as the modern "Tolerance" movement uses the religion of “Political Correctness” to silence all opposing viewpoints. The homosexual agenda intends on sweeping and controlling the nation. If bills such as this are signed into law it sets a precedent for the surreptitious and incremental destruction of the moral fabric and Constitutional freedom that we enjoy and represent to the rest of the world.

What I fail to comprehend is why would a self-described mutation of nature, if as they say, is in fact what homosexuality really is, then what would attempting to proselyte a heterosexual child to try homosexuality accomplish. If homosexuality isn’t a lifestyle one chooses; then all this homosexual education is ludicrous and irrelevant. It would then be like being born with Down syndrome or (Trisomy 21) and then trying to convince society that it was normal and therefore everyone should have Trisomy 21. If it is not elective then it is not elective… Then Homosexuals need to do what they need to do and leave the rest of us alone.

But of course this is not what the homosexual movement is about. It is about a get in your face agenda, special rights for a special group of people. Moreover no one else should have these same rights. This philosophy does not belong in a democracy where the same rights are for everybody.

Example, although some should not, everyone has the same right to marry. If one chooses not to, under the 6000 year old accepted world culture of a man and a woman, then one doesn’t have to. One can choose to remain single, hence the right to choose. But Freedom and rights does not mean that just because one is a member of PETA and loves his goat that one should have a special right to marry it.

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 26, 2007


HAPPY GAY COMING OUT DAY is offensive to me and therefore should be a hate crime…

By de Andréa

I originally wrote about this issue On March 15, 2007, titled, 9th Cercuit Court censors Christians. [You can reread it by checking the archives for March] I wrote the article about this same one sided civil rights issue as it unfolded in Oakland Ca. It should be obvious to anyone with an IQ above 95 that all this “hate crime” nonsense should work both ways.

George Will recently wrote an article titled, “When marriage became a hate crime” for the Jewish World Review. In it he said, Marriage is the foundation of the natural family and sustains family values”. That statement; according to Oakland city government, “is inflammatory and a hate crime”. “That city's government says those words, in bold italics here, constitute something akin to hate speech, and cannot be tolerated in the government's open e-mail system and employee free speech bulletin board.”

If making a factual, historically and scientifically supported statement, is a prosecutable “hate crime”, then I declare war on these scrambled DNA mutants. If nature, as they say, made them what they are, and played a dirty trick on them, it isn’t the rest of societies fault. In a free society one cannot exercise ones rights while taking that same right away from others, if so, freedom would self-destruct. Moreover, this is exactly what is happening right here in the once “late great free nation of America”.

I accept all this “hate crime”, “homophobic” garbage that the homosexual group has dumped on the rest of society as a declaration of war on the heterosexual straight, normal society. What has existed as commonplace, natural, and prevalent for 6000 years in societal history doesn’t become a crime just because it opposes a self proclaimed mutation of nature.

The unconstitutional McCain-Feingold law, empowered government to regulate the quantity, content, and timing of political campaign speech about governmental electorates. But it was to become more than that, it evolved and became an incremental and predictable step toward making free speech a crime. Moreover, it was just a matter of time that the right of free speech would eventually be sacrificed.

This small minority of homosexuals, who go against the laws of nature, say that free speech impedes their right to promote a minority mutated agenda of their specific social objectives. And it was just as predictable that speech suppression would become an instrument of cultural combat used to settle ideological scores and advance unusual and obnoxious political agendas by manipulating and silencing its adversaries.

As a refresher of the issue, a small group of African-American Christian women working for Oakland's government organized the Good News Employee Association (GNEA), which they announced with a flier describing their group as "a forum for people of Faith to express their views on the contemporary issues of the day. With respect for the “Natural Family, Marriage and Family Values.” The flier was distributed after other employees' groups, including those advocating gay rights, had advertised their political views and activities on the city's e-mail system and bulletin board.

When the GNEA asked for equal opportunity to communicate by that system and that board, they were denied. Furthermore, the flier they posted was taken down and destroyed by city officials, who declared it "homophobic" and disruptive. The city government said the flier was "determined" to promote harassment based on sexual orientation. The city warned that the flier and communications like it could result in disciplinary action "up to and including termination."

Effectively, the city proscribed that any speech that even one person might say, questioned the gay rights agenda, created what one person felt was a "hostile environment,” is considered a hate crime This, even though gay rights advocates used the city's communication system to advertise "Happy Coming Out Day.” Yet the terms "natural family," "marriage" and "family values" are considered intolerably inflammatory.

I what my Heterosexual Rights, and gay “Happy Coming Out Day” is offensive to me. I want these Homosexuals arrested and put in jail for a “hate crime”. Moreover they have stolen the word “gay”, just so that they can tap-dance around the process of revealing their true identity. Now that the homosexuals have nicked the word gay, to hide behind, the rest of society can no longer use the word.

In Oakland, this dialectic of censorship proceeded on a reasonable premise joined to a preposterous theory. The premise is that city officials are entitled to maintain workplace order and decorum. The truth is that government supervisors have such unbridled power of prior restraint on speech in the name of maintaining order and decorum that they can nullify the First Amendment by declaring that even the mild historically accepted text of the GNEA flier is inherently disruptive.
The only cited disruptive opponent was one lesbian's complaint that the flier made her feel "targeted" and "excluded.” The truth is, that she put herself in that position and thereby excluded herself and now wants society to pay for her irresponsibility, oh! I forgot they say they are mutants and can’t help it. But anyone should not have the power to be a censor just by saying someone's speech has hurt his or her feelings. However, GNEA's members could plausibly argue that the city's speech police have created a "hostile workplace environment" against them. Naw, that would of course be free hate speech, I mean free speech, I’m sorry, I mean hate speech. Oh boy, one has to be careful what one says in this free country that still advertises the right of freedom of speech.

The Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the city's right to impose speech restrictions that are patently not content neutral. (or politically incorrect) I understand that Congress is currently trying to enact yet another "hate crime" law that would authorize enhanced punishments for crimes committed because of, among other things, the sexually challenged mutants. [This evolution is blatantly happening before ones very eyes]

The HILC, a coalition of African-American clergy, the High Impact Leadership Coalition, opposes this, fearing it might be used "to muzzle the church.” And it will! The clergy argue that in our "litigation prone society" this legislation would result in lawsuits having "a chilling effect" on speech and religious liberty. As this Oakland case demonstrates, that, too, is eventually probable.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Just as this case has incrementally and surreptitiously evolved from an unconstitutional law designed to stop the free exchange of ideas and thoughts regarding the election of so-called representatives, (which incidentally was one of the two main reasons that the framers documented the first Amendment) it will, unless we go to war to reverse this perversion of the First Amendment, it will continue to evolve and eventually destroy the very foundation of this Country.

December 15, 1791
“Articles in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United Stated of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. The conventions of a number of States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, (bold italics mine) that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, (bold italics mine) will best insure the beneficient ends of its institution.

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


When was the last time the Congress made a law that had to do with religion or restricted the free exercise thereof??? When was the last time Congress made a law abridging your freedom of speech??? When was the last time the freedom of the press was stepped on??? When was the last time you were denied the right to peaceably assemble??? Moreover do you even know how to properly petition the Government for redress of grievances??? I have news for you; because Congress has exercised its right to dictate what they determine is the proper formal protocol one would use to petition the government, one would have to be a Philly lawyer to figure out how to do it properly, otherwise you can forget your petitions.

Our Federal, State, and local governments have all violated this Constitutional Amendment; moreover they will continue to do so, until it is for some only a distant memory. In time the rest will not even have heard of it, then it will be the tyrannical oppression of the early 17 hundreds all over again.
Earlier, I mentioned that this hate crime business works both ways, so I am inventing a new word. (after all it is a popular thing to do these days) I am inventing the word Hetrophobic. That's right, these self-described mutants of nature who hide behind the hijacked word Gay, are Hetrophobic and are committing hate crimes; it has become a war of self defence.

Moreover, in the face of this destruction, the liberals, both Democrat and Republican, call themselves progressives. Sometimes just protecting what one has, is progress enough, think about it…

de Andréa

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Muslim Infiltration in America:

Suggested Questions for a Congressional Hearing

Last summer Senator Joe Lieberman read a book written by Bruce Bawer titled While Europe Slept. He was shocked at what he read. He may have learned something that very few westerners have even taken the time to explore.

By de Andrea

It’s about the Islamic European conquest from within occurring in what many have chosen to call Eurabia after the Islamic scholar Bat Ye'or's book of the same title. This topic emerged during the Senator’s campaign speeches on foreign policy and homeland security, it keyed off of his role as a co-sponsor of the 9/11 review Commission. As Chairman of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC), the Senator and his staff have scheduled a series of 'exploratory hearings' on this vital and important topic. Three hearings have been held to date and broadcast on C-SPAN:

· The Threat of Islamic Radicalism to the Homeland on March 14th;
· The Internet; A portal to Violent Islamic Extremism on May 3rd; and,
· Violent Islamist Extremism: Government Efforts to Defeat It on May 10th

A little like rewiring the house after it has burned down, however the committee staff informs us that a series of follow up hearings will be held over the summer culminating in a report in the fall to complete this important agenda.

This may result in uncovering a series of mistakes made in the ignorant expectations of Islam and in the misinterpretation of the motives of the Middle East coming to the West. Looking through western eyes one would think they come here to experience freedom… When in reality they come so that we can experience Islam.

Many authors, including yours truly have written articles, essays, and books on the subject of a potential Islamic America, such as Lebanese born Brigitte Gabriel, bestselling author of Because They Hate, Paul Sperry author of Infiltration, Robert Spencer’ The Politically Incorrect Guide To ISLAM, and my own book ISLAM EXPOSED.

A number of suggested Issues were made to the Committee for possible investigation. While they are by no means exhaustive, they are indicative of compelling matters that should be explored by the Committee. Moreover, should have been explored more than several decades ago.

Nevertheless, in the wake of a number of news events here in the U.S following the first three hearings by HSGAC., the issues raise, are relevant to the hearing topic: Muslim Extremism in America. Or, as in Eurabia, and Islamerica.

Here are some of the suggested issues for the HSGAC and other Congressional Committees to consider in the conduct of exploratory hearings on Muslim Extremism in America:

Why is the Muslim Extremism so prone to espousing violence, terror and demonizing of the "Other" which make adherents so shockingly unassimilated in Western societies and contemptuous of our civil and human rights laws and standards here in America?

Why is there a 'cognitive disconnect' when Muslim advocates 'brand' Islam as a 'religion of peace' while espousing the imperative of Jihad and Dhimmitude against the unbelievers by the 'ummah'-the Muslim community of believers?

Does this Muslim Extremism arise from Islamic canons-the Qu'ran, Hadiths, Sira, etc.?

What documentation is available to focus on these issues; e.g., Dr. Andrew Bostom's two volumes on The Legacy of Jihad, and the forthcoming The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism , Bat Ye'or's several books on Dhimmis and Dhimmitude culminating in Eurabia, the several published works by Bob Spencer, director of Jihad watch, and the unpublished papers by Stephen Coughlin, Islamic Law specialist at the Joint Chiefs of Staff in DOD .

Why did 26 % of American Muslim youths surveyed by the Pew Research Center support suicide attacks?

Why did the New Jersey Fort Dix Six become Jihadist?

Why did a young U.S. Muslim captured in Saudi Arabia threaten our President's life?

What is occurring in Madras’s and Mosques here in the U.S. that gives rise to Muslim Extremism?

What evidence is available from current and immediate past reports about the content of books, pamphlets, and Friday sermons that foster such incitement to violence and hatred?
Some resources include the Freedom House reports, MEMRI translations and videos, and Investigative Project reports .

What sources-both domestic and foreign- are providing funding , and supplying textual materials for religious instruction of Muslim youth and believers? Is it the American ummah itself, or foreign governments, e.g., Saudi Arabia?

Why aren't there reformist movements in Islam akin to the reformation of Christianity and the enlightenment movement in Judaism that would reduce xenophobic and violence tendencies in Islam?

Why are 'moderate and secular Muslims' rejected, trivialized, threatened with Fatwa’s, and lacking in support by normative Muslims here in America?

What Muslim sects and doctrines supply chaplains in our prison system?
Why is normative Islam the 'fastest growing religion' in our nation's correctional systems?
What is the underlying factors propelling the dramatic growth in Muslim converts among minority convicted felons in our nation's prison systems?

Who is supporting Muslims Chaplains and Imams in espousing xenophobic and violence doctrines? Is it our federal, state, and local governments?

What Islamic organizations are behind the creation and operations of 14 Muslim paramilitary training camps in America whose 'graduates' consist largely of former prison converts to Islam?

How many have been processed by these Para military training camps? What is the rational and purposes of their operations? Where is the financial support coming from for these camps?

There are an estimated 4 to 12,000 Muslims members of our Armed Forces, do they have a higher allegiance to the ummah - the Muslim community of believers?
Who is training Military Muslim chaplains and how do we assure that they are maintaining the loyalty of Muslim soldiers to our government and Commander in Chief?

Why is our national security and intelligence apparatus so lacking in linguistic, cross cultural and Islamic law and doctrine training to develop effective counter terrorism programs?
How should this lack of knowledge about Muslim fundamentalist doctrine be corrected?

Have our federal humanitarian and refugee resettlement laws and programs been unwitting factors in planting Muslim extremists in our nation's heartlands since the 1990's in such locations at Nashville and Memphis, Tennessee, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Omaha, and Fort Wayne?
Have we inadvertently permitted such groups in our midst to manipulate other federal minority preference assistance programs for nefarious ends? If so, how can we correct these defects?

Why are our national security and law enforcement agencies biased against the hiring of qualified non-Muslims linguists, translators, and analysts in critical languages?
How do we remove barriers for the employment of these qualified non-Muslims in important intelligence and national security activities?

What lies behind the spate of defamation suits brought by terrorists supported Muslim Advocacy groups like CAIR, MPAC and others in state courts?

Best examples being the flying Imams ' John and Jane Doe' case, the now resolved CAIR -Anti-CAIR Virginia law suit and the Islamic Society of Boston litigation in the Massachusetts courts?
Is it to redress legitimate anti-Islamic matters of discrimination or is it an attempt to use our civil courts to stifle free speech and First Amendment Rights of Christian Americans?

What prospects are there for Muslim assimilation to American standards of civil and human rights interfacing the legal status and treatment of Muslim women in America?

THE BOTTOM LINE: As stated at the beginning this is not unlike attempting to repair the wiring after the house has burned to the ground. Well, maybe that is just a little extreme and premature even for me. But you see; I can’t help notice that Europe has taken this very path of tolerance, trying to do the so-called “Christian thing” by welcoming our Arab brothers and sisters into their home. The problem begins when the Muslims surreptitiously take control of their home and there is eventually no room for anyone except Muslims and those that are subjected to them.

All of these questions have but one answer. The agenda of the Nation of Islam has always been the same; is still the same; and will always be the same; that is, to conquer all the peoples of all the nations of the earth, and by force, even into death first convert all to Islam or second to make slaves of all infidels who will not convert, and of course there is always the third option, death by murder, the Quran calls it, to be struck on the neck. I call it demonic torture.

To even refer to the terrorists as just a few fundamental extremists, is nothing but simple ignorance. One must for example ask why, we never run out of these so-called very few Muslim extremist??? Not for a thousand years!!! Answer; because they are not Muslims Extremists, they are just traditional literal Muslims doing what the Quran tells them to do. They either support those that are Carrying out the agenda of Islam or they are used by Allah in infiltration or the implementation of what we ignorantly call terror, The Muslims call it Jihad, whatever one prefers to call it, it is whatever is necessary to carry out Allah’s will of world conquest according the Quran.

Welcome to Islamerica…

de Andréa


Christian arrested for visiting Mecca. This sparked a year long study of Islam by a human rights organization in Washington DC. Only Muslims are allowed to enter Islam's holy city

By de Andréa

The title “Freedom of Religion Does Not Exist in Islam” is really an understatement, freedom of any kind does not exist in Islam. Islam is a world wide autocratic theocracy, bent on global power and total control under Sharia law.

The discovery and arrest of a Christian man in Mecca is just a result of Islam’s hatred of Christian’s world wide, and has opened a Pandora’s Box of information about the support of Islamic Jihad taught in Terrorist Wahhabists Mosques in the U.S.

Saudi authorities discovered a Christian man working in Mecca and they immediately arrested him, sighting the Sharia law barring non-Muslims from the Islamic holy city.

The Saudi regime's Expatriates Monitoring Committee used a new high-tech finger-print system to identify Nirosh Kamanda of Sri Lanka as a Christian, reported Arab News, the government-approved English-language Newspaper.
"The Grand Mosque and the holy city are forbidden to non-Muslims," said Col. Suhail Matrafi, head of the department in charge of Expatriates Affairs in Mecca. "The new fingerprints system is very helpful and will help us a lot to discover the identity of a lot of criminals and overstayers."

Kamanda came to the Saudi city of Dammam to work as a truck driver and left his sponsor to sell goods near Mecca's Grand Mosque, Arab News reported. The sponsor reportedly denied he knew where Kamanda was working. "He fled six months after coming to the kingdom," the sponsor said. "I have no idea how he reached Mecca."

Arab News said that after Kamanda's identity became known, he admitted he was a Christian and had come to Mecca to earn money. “I heard that Mecca is a safe place, where I could hide my identity," he said. [This shows the deception of a man who even lived among the Muslims, and was yet deceived because he saw Islam through Christian eyes, it is even more difficult for the West to be cognizant of, or to conceive of the evil mind and spirit of a nation of a people lost in history, where the word love and charity is not in their vocabulary or in the Quran, their only book of learning.]

The U.S. State Department, in its annual reports on human rights worldwide, consistently has stated "religious freedom does not exist" in Saudi Arabia, which is dominated by the strict Wahhabists interpretation of Islam. In the kingdom, the State Department says, non-Muslim "worshippers risk arrest, imprisonment, torture, and sometimes death for engaging in religious activity that attracts official attention.”

The Saudi royal family has stated it permits non-Muslims to practice their own religion in the privacy of their homes, but many arrests have been made of worshippers in house churches.

In 2004, for the first time, the State Department named Saudi Arabia as a "country of particular concern," subjecting it to possible sanctions for egregious and ongoing violations of religious freedom.

In the U.S., an estimated 80 percent of mosques are supported mostly with funds and imams from Wahhabist Saudi Arabia.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings in 2006 in response to a yearlong study by a Washington human-rights group asserting the government of Saudi Arabia is disseminating propaganda through mosques in the U.S. that teaches hatred of Jews and Christians and instructs Muslims that they are on a mission behind enemy lines to destroy a land of unbelievers.

15 senators, including Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, demanding the Bush administration take stronger action against the Saudi’s.

AMERICAN AND GLOBAL JIHADReport: c The 89-page report by Freedom House's Center for Religious Freedom, click here., "Saudi publications on hate ideology fill American Islamic Mosques" concludes the Saudi government propaganda examined reflects a "totalitarian ideology of hatred that can incite to violence.” The report says this fact it is "being mainstreamed within our borders through the efforts of a foreign government, namely Saudi Arabia, demands our urgent attention."

The report asserts: "Not only does the government of Saudi Arabia not have a right – under the First Amendment or any other legal document – to spread hate and destruction ideology within U.S. borders, it is committing a human-rights violation and treason by advocating the over through of the U.S. Government."

Former CIA chief James Woolsey, chairman of the board of Freedom House, writes in the forward that such publications that "advocate an ideology of hatred and genocide have no place in a nation founded on religious freedom."

Among the key findings of the report: Various Saudi government publications gathered for the study, most of which are in Arabic, assert that it is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews and warn against imitating, befriending, or helping them in any way or taking part in their festivities and celebrations;

The documents promote contempt for the United States because it is ruled by legislated civil law rather than by totalitarian Wahhabi-style Sharia Islamic law. They condemn democracy as un-Islamic. This is interesting in light of the U.S. attempt to install a democracy in Iraq, is this even a worthwhile endeavor in an Islamic State.

The documents stress that when Muslims are in the lands of the unbelievers, they must behave as if on a mission behind enemy lines. They are there to acquire new knowledge and make money to be later employed in the jihad against the infidels, and to proselytize the infidels until at least some convert to Islam and aid in the Jihad to destroy the government and infrastructure.

Any other reason for lingering among the unbelievers in their lands is illegitimate, and unless a Muslim leaves as quickly as possible, he or she is not a true Muslim and so too must be condemned. For example, a document in the collection for the "Immigrant Muslim" bears the words "Greetings from the Cultural Attaché in Washington, D.C." of the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, and is published by the government of Saudi Arabia.

In an authoritative religious voice, it gives detailed instructions on how to "hate" the Christian and Jew: Never greet them first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never imitate the infidel. Do not become a naturalized citizen of the United States. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel.

Under Islamic Sharia law, "apostates' from Islam can be sentenced to death; this is an implied death threat against the tolerant Muslim imam, as well as an incitement to vigilante violence;

For a Muslim who fails to uphold the Saudi Wahhabi sect's sexual mores [i.e. through homosexual activity or heterosexual activity outside of marriage], the edicts published by the Saudi government's Ministry of Islamic Affairs and found in American mosques advise "it would be lawful for Muslims to spill his blood and to take his money".

Regarding those who convert out of Islam, the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs explicitly asserts, they "should be killed"; Saudi textbooks and other publications in the collection, propagate a Nazi-like hatred for Jews, treat the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion as historical fact, and avow that the Muslim's duty is to eliminate the state of Israel.

The report states: "While the government of Saudi Arabia claims to be 'updating' or reforming its textbooks and study materials within the kingdom, its publications propagating an ideology of hatred remain plentiful in American mosques and Islamic centers, and continue to be the principal indoctrination of students of Islam within the United States."

The Center for Religious Freedom said the research, translation, and principle analysis of the materials for the report were carried out by both Muslims and non-Muslims who wish to remain anonymous for reasons of personal security.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It would seem that the study group has at least somewhat of a grasp of what Islam is about. But in the face of all the documentation, the fact that our enemy continues to operate, plan, and train the future military of American Islamic jihad, freely within the nonexistent borders of the U.S. shows that this administration still hasn’t a clue that the most dangerous, vicious, deceptive and violent enemy that the world has ever encountered, is fallaciously perceived as a warm fuzzy peaceful friend. Islam is not our friend, Islam is nobodies friend, Islam is everyone's enemy.
Moreover Islam is actually surreptitiously preparing to sanguinate this Christian nation right here in front of our liberal, tolerant, politically correct, naive, and blind Western eyes.
Remember this, blind people bleed out just as profusely as sighted people, but at least if one is informed, one knows what is coming and can prepare.

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Crackdown on Christians is Worldwide

Fears raised that Islamic law will expand, under world infiltration by Islam

By de Andréa

Christians in Nigeria, who make up only about half the population now, are expressing fears that Islamic law already being enforced in northern states will expand nationwide with the inauguration this month of a new "devout Muslim" president, according to a report from the voice of the Martyrs.

Musa Yar' Adua was governor of Katsina state in northern Nigeria, where he and nearly a dozen other governors over recent years have imposed Islamic religious law as the law of the government, officials said.

"We have not been allowed to worship freely, as churches have been denied places of worship. In the Government Reservation Area, for example, it is not possible to get land for places of worship by Christians," Rev. Canon Williams said.

Muslim rioters in Nigeria in 2006 were incensed over cartoons of their prophet Muhammad published in Denmark, and more than 130 Christians in the Nigerian cities of Maiduguri and Onitsha were slaughtered even though Nigerian Christians had nothing whatsoever to do with the Danish newspapers, I suppose the head of one Christian is as good as another. The reports documented six children burned to ashes in front of their father, VOM said.

Nearly 1,000 homes of Christians and many churches have been destroyed in those regions, and enforcement of Islamic law is everywhere. "If you go around villages, you will see people missing one hand or one foot," explained Rev. Obiora Ike. "It is not the result of an illness; it is the result of Sharia law." More than 10,000 Christians have been killed in the region since the Islamic law was imposed in 1999.

"The election of Yar' Adua will aggravate the problems of Christians in northern Nigeria, under a Muslim president, religious liberty will be further eroded until we are all dead," another pastor said in the VOM report.

Under Yar' Adua's supervision in Katsina, the government set up a system to deliberately deny permission for any Christian churches to acquire land or build. In just recent weeks and months, the murder of Christians has increased there. Alhassan Adamu, the secretary of the board of an evangelical Christian school, said persecution now is commonplace.

Converts from Islam to Christianity have also been murdered, destruction of churches, discrimination against Christians and denial of admission of Christian students in public schools, to name a few," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This news today of the incremental conquest of Christian Nigeria by the Nation of Islam, is an example of the future of Europe and America tomorrow. For thirteen hundred years the Nation of Islam has had the agenda of conquering the world. As absurd as that might seem they are in fact surreptitiously and incrementally carrying out this agenda right here in America, what’s more they are successfully accomplishing this command of their god Allah, all over the world, all this is going on while we in the west sip our liberal Kool aid, embrace Multi-Culturalism and blindly go on living in the complicacy of what is left of the American dream of happiness and freedom.

What we are doing is turning a blind eye to the fact that the story of Nigeria has for the last 20 years also been going on in Europe as well. Moreover it is at this very moment, stealthily going on right here in America. The only difference is, we are 25, maybe 30 years behind Nigeria. The countries where this is occurring are different, and in different parts of the world, but Islam is the same world wide with the same relentless agenda for over 1300 years.

The fears of the Nigerians are not unfounded, what blows me away is why the same fear is not evident right here in the U.S. The only answer is ignorance, and complacency. This slippery slope of deception and the stealthy invasion of Islam may seem at first like a human rights issue. But by the time a nation comes to recognize that they are losing their country to the Nation of Islam and Sharia law, it is too late. The country is hopelessly falling straight down into Wahhabism; moreover, at that point the only fundamental issue left is survival, death, or slavery.

de Andréa

Monday, June 18, 2007

Seduced by the deceptive so-called true moderate peaceful Islam

Like a lot of Americans, this young college student was seduced by the deceptive so-called true moderate peaceful Islam

Daveed Gartenstein Ross was a typical young American Seeking answers to spiritual questions.

By de Andréa

Like so many Americans, Ross was totally ill-equipped to recognize the deceptive surreptitious culture of Islam. He too looked at Islam through Western Eyes.

Raised by Jewish-born hippie-era parents in liberal Ashland Oregon, he longed to find a religion that would ground his liberal/social consciousness in spiritual ideals.

A Jew is a most unlikely candidate for Islam, but Ross was nevertheless wooed by the charisma of a Muslim collage student who seemed to have what he was looking for. Daveed Gartenstein-Ross converted to Islam and began to eagerly learn the details of the Islamic Religion.

Ross didn’t have any inkling of what was to come.

In the beginning, as a lot of Americans are, Ross was convinced that true Islam was peaceful and loving and as in any religion, there were just a few extremists that gave Islam a bad name. But after he became fully immerse in his spiral descent into the bizarre world of the true Islamic jihadist subculture going on in America. (He soon discovered that love and peace are words not found in the Quran.)

Note: After studying Islamic culture, one will find that Islam is anything but charitable…

After college, Ross went to work for the al Haramain Islamic Foundation, one of the many so-called Muslim charities. It eventually became clear to him that any Islamic organization including this one was dedicated to furthering the aims of Global Islamic Jihad. Haramain funded terrorists abroad while it spread the Ideology of Global conquest here in America, so much for Islamic charity.

Ross became increasingly disturbed by Sharia law and the restrictions on freedom of speech and religion. He discovered that Islam had only one direction in life and that was death. Death to the Kuffaar and even death to themselves, in Islam there is nothing blessed about life.

The interesting thing however, was that he discovered the version of Islam taught by what he now thought to be extremist, was exactly what he was reading in the Quran and the cultural traditions of Islam. Even though he would be sought after, this discovery caused him to be uneasy enough to quietly disappear and resume his spiritual search elsewhere and with renewed vigor.

After a year inside Islam he left the foundation and carefully slipped away from Islam itself. His search and desire for answers led him to theological and historical investigations which in turn led him to the realization that Christianity was in fact the only true faith; Daveed Gartenstein-Ross became a Christian.

Just about that time, the Haramain Islamic Foundation was shut down by the FBI and his former employer was charged by the U.S. government for funding terrorism. Ross by this time was a lawyer at a well-known legal firm; he volunteered to be questioned by the FBI. They already knew who he was.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Because Ross was inside Islam it only took a year for him to discover the deception behind whom and what Islam is. The rest of us do not have that advantage. Learn the truth about Islam from Ross. You can read Ross’s entire story, titled: My Year Inside RADICAL ISLAM, available at most bookstores.

de Andréa

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Terrorists seize CIA files

The documents are said to provide full details of the U.S. Intel networks in Middle East

By de Andréa

According to the Jerusalem Post, terrorist groups, including Hamas and the Popular Resistance Committees, have seized all of CIA security files stored at major compounds of militias associated with the U.S.-backed Fatah terrorist organization of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The terror leaders claimed the files contain, among other information, details of CIA networks in the Middle East.

"The CIA files we seized, which include documents, CDs, taped conversations and videos, are more important than all the American weapons we obtained the last several days as we took over the traitor Fatah's positions," said Muhammad Abdel-El, spokesman for the Hamas-allied Popular Resistance Committees terror group.

The Committees have been accused of carrying out anti-U.S. attacks, including a 2003 bombing of an American convoy in Gaza that killed three U.S. contractors. Hamas has in the past few days taken near-complete control of the Gaza Strip, advancing on the vast majority of Fatah security buildings and positions in the northern, southern, and central sections of the territory.

Hamas gunmen captured the second of four major Fatah command centers in central Gaza City, planting the group's green flag on the roof of the intelligence services building. Also, Hamas seized the Palestinian Preventive Security headquarters in Gaza, a major Fatah compound, reportedly executing witnesses and several defeated Fatah members.

According to Hamas sources, the terror group will soon advance on Gaza City's Ansar Compound, one of the most important Fatah security establishments and the site at which American weapons have been delivered to Fatah the past few years. Security sources say Ansar contains large quantities of weaponry the U.S. provided to Fatah.

Hamas and Popular Resistance Committees leaders took over the City's Fatah compounds, particularly the Preventative Security Services building and intelligence compound; they seized large quantities of what they said were CIA files concerning the Middle East.

They said prior to Hamas' advances, Fatah officials attempted to destroy the CIA files but only succeeded in eliminating some.

U.S. security coordinators the past few years maintained a presence at Fatah's Gaza headquarters. The U.S. regularly trains and arms Fatah militias and Fatah militias regularly attack Israel, go figure???

Abu Abdullah, a member of Hamas' so-called military wing, said, "Now our job is to study these files, which are already showing that they are crucial for our fight against the Zionists and anyone who collaborates with them, including the Americans."

Abdullah said the CIA documents they browsed so far contain "information about the collaboration between Fatah and the Israeli and American security organizations; CIA methods on how to prevent attacks, chase and follow after cells of Hamas and the Committees; plans about Fatah assassinations of members of Hamas and other organizations; and American studies on the security situation in Gaza." Abdullah claimed the documents also detailed CIA networks in other Arab countries and "how to help beat Islamic allies of Hamas in other Arab countries, including Egypt and Jordan."

"We will use these documents and make portions public to prove the collaboration between America and traitor Arab countries," Abdullah said.

Committees Spokesman Abdel El said that was sitting in a Gaza mosque and pouring through some of the files on the Committees when he found his name mentioned in the documents four times.

"I am amazed by the material and the context of the documents," he said.

Hamas seized U.S. weapons

Highly classified documents were not the only things seized by the terrorists group Hamas. The U.S. in the past year has given large quantities of weapons to bolster Fatah in clashes against Hamas. Hamas officials repeatedly said they would seize any American weaponry provided to Fatah in Gaza.

Hamas' Al Aqsa Television in the past few days broadcast footage of Hamas gunmen brandishing new American assault rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, rocket launchers and ammunition the U.S. reportedly provided to Fatah over the past few months. Hamas fighters also showed what they said were 10 American-provided armored personnel carriers the terror group said it seized from Fatah security compounds it took over Tuesday.

Hamas Abu Abdullah commented, "We informed you many times we would obtain all American arms brought to Gaza in the conspiracy against our government." Abu Abdullah said once Hamas takes over Gaza City's Ansar Compound his group would be "swimming" in American weaponry.

The last confirmed U.S. weapons transfer to Force 17 took place in May 2006 and in January and February of 2007 all totaled consisted of multiple transfers delivered to Fatah, included a cache of approximately 8000 assault rifles. What is the only country in all of history that ignorantly supplies its enemy with the weapons, money and Intel they need to fight? You are correct if you said America…

Many members of Force 17 are openly members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, Fatah's declared "military wing" which took responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years. The Jewish state regularly arrests Force 17 members accused of carrying out shooting attacks against Israelis.

PA President Abbas petitioned Israel to allow more weapons and munitions – including assault rifles provided by the U.S. – to reach his fighters in the Gaza Strip to bolster them against Hamas, according to diplomatic sources.

'Gaza has fallen'

Earlier, Abbas and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas agreed on the need to bring an end to the fighting between their respective parties, but a truce wasn't reached. Officials on both sides do not expect any momentum in dialogue between Hamas and Fatah until Hamas has taken over the entire Gaza Strip, which security sources say could happen within 24 to 36 hours.

A senior Palestinian Authority official from the Fatah party told said, "Gaza has fallen. It's now Hamas land. We (Fatah) have lost."

The official said Hamas seeks to create an "Islamic caliphate" in Gaza and that it is expected to put former Hamas Foreign Minister Mahmoud Al-Zahar in control of the terror group's reign in Gaza.

Israeli security officials said they were "gravely concerned" about Iran's influence over the territory Hamas now controls.

THE BOTTOM LINE: How is this any different than if we would arm the Shiite to fight the Sunnis, and then arm them both to fight Al Qaida, and then arm them all to fight Israel, while at the same time we support Israel? If you are a regular reader you will know that in several previous articles, I predicted that this very thing would eventually happen. Fatah, Hamas, Al-Qaida, what ever; it is a big mistake to ally ourselves and support any of these terrorists groups for any reason.

England, and America, just as in Lebanon, elect Muslims to their Parliament; and look what happened in Lebanon. I have a secret, it will happen here too.

The U.S. has been saying for years since before the time of Yasser Arafat that Hamas has to straighten up and fly right or we will stop sending them aid. Why are we sending them aid??? Again and again this kind of ignorant nonsense goes to prove that the Congress, the President, the State Department, heck the entire U.S. Government save a few, has no concept of the theocracy and agenda of all of Islam, it is all the same.

It really doesn’t matter what brand of aspirin one takes, aspirin is aspirin, come on, it’s acetylsalicylic acid. Islam is Islam, no matter what brand it is, it is hate and conquest. They hate themselves, they hate each other, they hate the Jews, they hate the Christians, they hate the Hindus, the Buddhists, heck they hate everybody and everything. You would too, if you had a god from the Dark Side like Allah, the ANGLE OF HATE AND DEATH...

ZZZZZZZZZZZZ…What??? Oh yeah sorry…

de Andréa .

Even 'Mickey Mouse' has joined the enemy

Mickey now brainwashes kids to fight for Islam's thirteen hundred year old agenda of “world domination”
By de Andréa

Not only is Islamic Jihad taught to children in American public schools, it has now spread to the schools in the Nation of Islam as well.

Al-Aqsa TV, run by the Palestinian Territories ruling party Hamas, features a squeaky-voiced Mickey Mouse look-alike in the weekly children's program named, "Tomorrow's Pioneers.” Palestinian children are being entertained and indoctrinated on television by Farfur, a Mickey Mouse impersonator who brainwashes heads full of mush to fight for the total genocide of the Jews and Kuffaar as well as Islam's conquest and domination over the entire world. [The Kuffaar is a derogatory ancient Arabic word for Infidel-Pig or non Muslim Pig.]

Farfur and his co-host, a young girl named Saraa', take every opportunity to indoctrinate young innocents with Islamic supremacy, hatred of Israel and the U.S. as welll as the support of "resistance" – the Palestinian euphemism for terrorism, reports the Israel-based Palestinian Media Watch.

Farfur tells children they must pray in the mosque five times a day until there is "world leadership under Sharia law. We, tomorrow's pioneers, will restore to this nation its glory, and we will liberate Al-Aqsa, with Allah's will, and we will liberate Iraq for Allah, and we will liberate the Muslim countries, invaded by murderers," the mouse character says.

Saraa' explains the nucleus of world Islamic leadership will be from "all of Palestine," meaning elimination of the entire state of Israel.

Farfur urges the children to "resist" Israel, "the oppressive invading Zionist occupation.” In one segment, Farfur says, "We will burn, Bush! We will burn, Condoleezza! He reinforces his message that the plan for world domination is progressing.

Saraa' warns the children they must give an account to Allah after they die for what they did or did not do for Palestinians imprisoned by the Israelis and for the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, disputed territory Palestinians consider sacred to Islam. "I remind you that Al-Aqsa and the prisoners are a responsibility on our shoulders, and Allah will ask us on Resurrection Day what we gave for their sake."

Child viewers phone in to the show and recite poems with images of hate and violence, according to PMW.

One child said, "We will destroy the chair of the despots, so they will taste the flame of death," and another, "Rafah sings 'Oh, oh.’ Its answer is an AK-47. We who do not know fear, and are willing to die for Allah; we are the predators of the forest."

Hamas, considered a terrorist organization, won a majority in parliament with the help of the U.S. government in the January 2006 elections, is still supported with U.S. foreign aid.

Hamas posted a photo of a little girl in a combat vest and the head band of the terrorist Al-Qassam Brigades practicing to be a suicide bomber.

The message accompanying the photo on the Shabakat Falastin Lilhiwar online forum says the girl "is part of the Muslim generation which will go down in history as a generation that refused to accept humiliation and defeat."

Hamas launched a children's website in 2002, encouraging kids to follow the example of terrorist suicide bombers. The children's website featured comic strips encouraging hatred of infidels and especially Jews, who are defined as "evil Zionists."

THE BOTTOM LINE: This is the result of the new trend in education, the indoctrination, and brainwashing of children rather than what education was originally designed for, and that is to teach young children to think and to use all the abilities that God gave them in a moral a proper way. The new educational philosophy is to promote anything but independent thinking and rational, rather it is to create human robots programmed to carry out a predetermined agenda. Moreover, the very sad truth is, that this is also the philosophy of the U.S. Government Department of public Education.

de Andréa

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Film Censorship by PBS

Film Censorship by PBS, because it doesn’t promote the politically correct view of Islam

By de Andréa

A film produced for airing on PBS called Islam Verses Islamists depicting what the producers see as the truth about Islam and the promotion of the Islamic agenda in America. The purpose of the film as I understand it is to expose the so-called Moderate Muslims and why they are not heard from. Apparently PBS doesn’t want them heard from either.

As a result of studying the history of Islam and the Quran for 17 years, I personally don’t believe there is any such thing as a warm fuzzy moderate middle of the road peaceable Muslim. Wahabism is the fastest growing form of Islam in the world, which finds it origins in Saudi Arabia and is what drives most of the so-called terrorists or jihadist. According to Quranic history, this Islamic religion of peace is a contradiction in terms.

What is referred to moderate Muslims are actually modern Muslims who have gone through a kind of metamorphosis over time, and at least temporarily have put the violent world conquest part of Muhammad’s teaching on hold. However once the violent jihad has become a reality even the modern Muslims will fall into step in support of their more legalistic brothers, in the mean time they are quietly biding their time.

Also I have heard several of these so-call moderate Muslims Interviewed in connection with this film and the typical so-called moderate Muslim was a white European American, who was [a nothing agnostic] before he or she got married to a Muslim and converted. The reason they are moderate, is that they are not Muslim.

That being said, I still believe this film deserves an airing, all sides should be heard. In digging into this only slightly, I discovered what was behind some of the negative propaganda for banning or censoring this film. The Politically Correct people of PBS are being pressured by several Islamic promoting organizations such as CAIR the Counsel on American Islam Relations and MATF the Muslim Accommodations Task Force and MSA Muslim Student Association.

Worse than that, PBS has [like the French and the Liberal Left] turned tail and run. All these Islamic Organizations are under investigation by the FBI some have known ties to Terrorist cells, some officials of these organizations have been arrested, tried, and convicted of supporting terrorism.

THE BOTTOM LINE: PBS like all the Alphabet Soup Media is obviously less interested in reporting the news and more interested in politically correct indoctrination.

So how does one get to the truth these days? Answer, it’s not easy, however we do have and advantage over the people in the old Soviet Union, remember TASS under Communism, the fictional Soviet news agency? It’s now called ITAR TASS.

At least in America, we still have multiple sources of news; one simply has to take the time and search.

I have the sick feeling however; as I watch this country lose sight of it's morality, truth, and freedom, that we will soon be receiving our news from a totally censored organization much like the old Soviet TASS, or Maybe Al Jazzeera…

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Is China now trying to kill us with their manufactured products?

Products made in China will choke, burn, drown, trap, break, or cut and in many cases kill Americans.

By de Andréa

Washington's consumer safety recalls an overwhelming amount of imports from China.

A while back I wrote an article about China trying to poison not only our pets but Americans as well. Now it seems that poisoning us is not fast enough, they are trying to kill us with faulty products as well.

One can’t really blame them though; China is running out of room for all their people, and nuclear bombs, so as soon as they kill us off, they can build a bamboo bridge from Shanghai to San Francisco and commute.

One would think that if China can build a nuclear bomb, they could build a lamp that doesn’t catch fire, or a candle that burns the wick instead of burning your house down. Yes one would think, but they don’t, because like I said, after we are gone, they want a place to store their Nukes and poison dog food.

It's not just Chinese food and drug imports that can kill you or your dog. Many of those bargain-priced products you pick up at Wal-Mart, Target, or Sam's Club could do the trick, as well.
Imports from China were recalled by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission more than twice as often as products made everywhere else in the world, including the U.S.

Of the 152 product recalls announced by the commission since January, 104 have been for products made in China.

Some of those products are:

Portable baby swings that entrap youngsters, resulting in 60 reports of cuts, bruises, and abrasions;

Swimming pool ladders that break, resulting in 127 reports of injuries, including leg lacerations requiring up to 21 stitches, five reports of bone fractures, two back injuries, two reports of torn ligaments and eight sprained ankles.

Faulty baby carriers that result in babies falling out and getting bruised, getting skulls cracked and hospitalizations;

Easy-Bake Ovens that trap children's fingers in openings, resulting in burns;

Oscillating tower fans whose faulty wiring results in fires, burns, and smoke inhalation injuries;

Exploding air pumps that have resulted in 13 lacerations including six facial injuries and one to the eye;

Bargain-priced oil-filled electric heaters, selling for less than $50, that burn down homes;

Notebook computer batteries that burn up computers cause other property damage and burn users;

Circular saws with faulty blade guards that result in cutting users, not wood.

Electrical products made in China represent a significant percentage of the recalls.
Last month, which was "National Electrical Safety Month," the commission noted the proliferation of "dangerous counterfeit electrical products," many of which come from China, that pose serious risk to life and limb.

The CPSC noted the market is saturated with counterfeit circuit breaker, power strips, extension cords, batteries, and holiday lights that are causing fires, explosions, shocks, and electrocutions.

The agency suggests that if the price of such an item seems to be too good to be true, it could be because the product is an inferior or unsafe counterfeit.

You might think an attractive, normal-looking table lamp would be safe. But 1,500 manufactured in China had to be recalled because of faulty light sockets that posed the risk of electrical shocks and fire hazards.

Or how about emergency lights that look just like other emergency lights but whose circuit board malfunctions, preventing illumination during emergencies? The CPSC recalled 3,200 of those last month.

And be careful which heated massaging recliners you relax in. If you chose one of the 1,700 manufactured in China and recalled by the commission last month, you might have found yourself medium rare, or in some cases well-done, because of an overheating and burn hazard that was discovered.

Even the simplest, most inexpensive items from China seem to pose massive risks. About 2,700 $12 pine cone candles had to be recalled when it was determined that the wick wouldn’t burn but the exterior coating caught fire.

The problem isn’t that Americans see a cheap electrical power strip with a circuit breaker and make the ignorant assumption that it does what it is supposed to do, but that the Red Chinese are quite obviously trying to get rid of us. If they can succeed in accomplishing it this way, they won’t have to waste a nuclear bomb, besides Nukes are so messy, they wouldn’t be able to use this country for a thousand years; so much for the bamboo bridge.

The counterfeits are not only counterfeits in the sense of improperly using brand names; they are actually counterfeits in the sense of pretending to do something they were never intended to do. The big problems occur when an over-taxed power strip doesn't trip a circuit. Fires occur, property is damaged, and people are killed, but isn’t that what they were intended to do?

Pier 1 Imports found out when 180,000 pieces of glassware were ordered recalled by the CPSC because the items broke for no apparent reason, sometimes cutting the hands of those holding them, cheers!

How could one go wrong purchasing an attractive kitchen stool engraved with a rooster on the seat? After all, it was only $30. Well, several people found out when the stools collapsed, even under the weight of small children. Cock-a-doodle-do…

You might want to think twice before entrusting your child to something as simple as a crib made in China. For years, American manufacturers scrupulously lived up to the exacting safety standards imposed by agencies like the CPSC. Not so with Chinese manufacturers because they are trying to reduce their purchasing market to zero.

Some 40,000 cribs had to be recalled when it was discovered that the directions instructed consumers to assemble them in ways that would result in the baby falling out and becoming entrapped. Additionally, locking pins on the side of the crib could pop off and cause a choking hazard. China must figure that abortions alone in the U.S. will not work fast enough.

About 450,000 infant car seat carriers manufactured in China had to be recalled when it was determined infants were falling out because of a faulty design. The Evenflo Co., which imported the carriers from China, received 679 reports of the handle on the car seat releasing for no reason, resulting in 160 injuries to children, including a skull fracture, two concussions and cuts and bruises.

Even books for young children have been found to contain plastic squeaker toys that have become lodged in babies' throats and metal clips that break off, potentially injuring kids. Well at least they didn’t explode.

Graco received 137 reports of infants mouthing, chewing, and sometimes choking on tiny pieces of its soft blocks tower toys imported from China. At least 32 infants were found gagging on the pieces and 49 choked on the plastic covering. In all, 40,000 had to be recalled.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Boy what America won’t do for a bargain, we will risk our limbs our lives and even the lives of our children, just for a cheap deal. I’d say the Chinese have us pretty well figured out. I just had an epiphany, these are the same people that make the ammunition for our military; I wonder if this has anything to do with our GI’s being blown up and burned. I mean it certainly couldn’t have anything to do with the peaceful Nation of Islam, could it???

de Andréa

Friday, June 08, 2007

Author, Sued by a Canadian University

Paul Williams, a well known American Journalist/Author, Sued by a Canadian University

McMaster’s University in Hamilton Ontario Canada referencing Paul Williams’s recent book titled THE DAY OF ISLAM: The Annihilation of the western world, stated that McMaster’s U, (supported, by the way, by al-Qaida) has been remiss in their security of their research nuclear reactor facilities.

By de Andréa

Mr. Paul Williams recently released book about Adnan el-Shukrijumah the most dangerous man in the world and the most wanted man by the FBI pointed out that Adnan attended Mc Masters U. and was easily able to smuggle nuclear material out of the University facility. Mr. Williams himself, without any security clearance was able to view the reactor and associated facilities and actually took photographs of everything he wanted to, supporting the statement in his book, about the lack of security at the reactor.

Paul Williams an American writer is now being sued by the Canadian University under Canadian Law for stating the obvious and a proven fact. Thanks to Michael Savage, a famous San fran Cisco national talk show host and his family in raising defence funds, Mr. Williams may be able to defend himself in a country where there is virtually no freedom of speech and where one is guilty until proven innocent.

This reason that this is so relevant is that it is connected to the two previous articles I posted about the Fixer Adnan el-Shukrijumah and the pending nuclear attack on seven U.S. cities. The Islamic terrorist who was involved in planning the 911 attack as well as the thwarted attack on Fort Dix N J is working directly with Bin Laden now on a plan to nuke or set off dirty bombs in seven American cities simultaneously.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Is this new concerted effort of H S, FBI, CIA, MI5, NSA and other members of the alphabet, really doing a good job, or are we just plain lucky??? Maybe it is just because Someone is watching over this ignorant country of ours…

de Andréa

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

Was Osama correct???

The Nation of Islam always believed the U.S. was weak. Recent political trends will support their view.

By de Andrea

During the Cold War, two things came to be known and generally recognized in the Middle East concerning the two rival superpowers. If you did anything to annoy the Russians, punishment would be swift and severe. But if you said or did anything against the Americans, not only would there not be any punishment; there might even be some possibility of reward; as the usual anxious procession of diplomats and politicians, journalists and scholars and other miscellaneous pacifists and apologists came with their usual pleading inquiries: "What have we done to offend you? What can we do to make it right?"

A few examples may be in order.
During the troubles in Lebanon in the 1970s and '80s, there were many attacks on American installations and individuals; notably the attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, followed by a prompt withdrawal, and a whole series of kidnappings of Americans, both official and private, as well as Europeans.

There was only one attack on Soviet citizens, when one diplomat was killed and several others kidnapped. The Soviet response through their local agents was swift, and dire, and was directed against the family of the leader of the kidnappers. As a result the kidnapped Russians were promptly released, moreover, after that there were no attacks on Soviet citizens or installations throughout the period of the Lebanese troubles.

These different responses evoked different treatment. While American policies, institutions, and individuals were subject to unremitting criticism and sometimes deadly attack, the Soviets were immune. The Soviets already ruled half dozen Muslim countries in Asia, without arousing any opposition or criticism.

Initially, their decision and action to invade and conquer Afghanistan and install a puppet regime in Kabul went almost uncontested.

One might have expected that the recently established Organization of the Islamic Conference would take a tougher line. It did not. After a month of negotiation and manipulation, the organization finally held a meeting in Pakistan to discuss the Afghan question. Two of the Arab states, South Yemen and Syria, boycotted the meeting. The representative of the PLO, a full member of this organization, was present, but abstained from voting on a resolution critical of the Soviet action; the Libyan delegate went further, and used this occasion to denounce the U.S.

The Muslim willingness to submit to Soviet authority, though widespread, was not unanimous. The Afghan people, who had successfully defied the British Empire in its prime, ultimately found a way to resist the Soviet invaders. An organization known as the Taliban (literally translated, "the students") began to organize resistance and even guerilla warfare against the Soviet occupiers and their puppets. For this, they were able to attract some support from the Muslim world; some grants of money, and growing numbers of volunteers to fight in the Holy War against the infidel conqueror. Notable among these was a group led by a Saudi of Yemeni origin called Osama bin Laden.

To accomplish their purpose, they did not disdain to turn to the U.S. for help, which they got. In the Muslim perception there has been, since the time of the Prophet Muhammad, an ongoing hatred of Western Christianity by Islam, and they have been violently bent on removing whatever obstacles that might be in their path. For a long time, the main enemy was seen, with some plausibility, as being the West, but some Muslims were, naturally enough, willing to accept what help they could get against their common enemy. This explains the widespread support in the Arab countries and in some other places first for the Third Reich and, after its collapse, for the Soviet Union. These were the main enemies of the West, and therefore natural allies to Islam. [“The enemy of my enemy is my friend”.]

Now however, the situation had changed. The more immediate, more dangerous enemy was the Soviet Union, already ruling a number of Muslim countries, and daily increasing its influence and presence in others. It was therefore natural to seek and accept American help. As Osama bin Laden explained, in this final phase of the millennial struggle, the world of the unbelievers was divided between two superpowers. The first task was to deal with the more deadly and more dangerous of the two, the Soviet Union. After that, dealing with the passive, pampered, and degenerate Americans would be easy.

We in the Western world see the defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union as a Western, more specifically an American, victory in the Cold War. For Osama bin Laden and his followers however, it was a Muslim victory in a jihad, and, given the circumstances, this perception does not lack some plausibility.

From the writings and the speeches of Osama bin Laden and his colleagues, it is clear that they expected this second task, dealing with America, would be comparatively simple and easy. This perception was certainly encouraged and so it seemed, confirmed by the lack of an American response to a whole series of attacks; first on the World Trade Center in New York and on U.S. troops in Mogadishu in 1993, on the U.S. military office in Riyadh in 1995, on the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, on the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000, all of which evoked only angry words, sometimes accompanied by the dispatch of expensive missiles to damage a tent and possible kill a camel in some remote part of the dessert.

Stage one:
Jihad was to drive the infidels from the lands of Islam; with that accomplished;

Stage two:
Was to bring this war into the enemy camp, and the attacks of 9/11 were clearly intended to be the opening salvo of this stage.

The violent response to 9/11, so completely out of accord with previous American practice, came as a shock to the Muslim world, and it is noteworthy that there has been no significant attack on American soil since then.

The U.S. actions in Afghanistan and in Iraq indicated that there had been a major change in the U.S., and that some revision of their assessment, and of the policies based on that assessment, was likely necessary. In more recent developments, and notably the public discourse and political correctness inside the U.S. administration and in Congress, are persuading increasing numbers of Islamic jihadist that their first assessment may have been correct after all, and that they need only to be patient and press a little harder to achieve final victory.

History will record whether they are right or wrong in this view. If they are right, the consequences for America and the entire Western Nations will be disastrous to say the least.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It should, at the very least, be clear to this administration and the Congress, that this enemy respects nothing but and instant response of overwhelming power. This is obviously the only language that Islam understands. So if we should resume, and, or continue with our pacifistic position, or even as we have been doing, to lift the throttle up on our aggressive resolve, we will once again be seen as weak and impotent. The west can ill afford to allow this relentless theocracy of Islam to continue its agenda of violent world conquest and domination.

If we walk away from the challenge of aggressive response to this murderous attack of 911 then we will have reduced ourselves to defending our very survival…

de Andréa