Monday, March 31, 2008

U.S. Islamic Indoctrination

Train-up a child…and he will not depart from it.
”Every Muslim youth must strike fear in the hearts of the enemies of God and their people through combat-readiness and skillful target shooting"

One of the many missing, important aspects in American understanding of Islam is a grasp of the believer-unbeliever dynamic and the resulting dhimmah laws imperative to waging war against unbelievers until they convert, submit to Islamic law, or are expelled or killed.

Do you know what your child is being taught in public schools? With only 1.4 % of the U.S. population so far, the Influence of Islam suggests that it wields a much larger stick when it comes to the curriculum that your child is being exposed to.

If you think that you and your family, because you live in the United States, are immune to the effects of Islamic Jihad then this is a must read for you. Sharia law and Islamic ideology is being surreptitiously and incrementally introduced and adopted by American citizens through the back door of your children’s education. Even if you do not have children or you do not have children in public school, your neighbor likely does. And, this puts you and your American culture of freedom at a perilous risk.

Why are you and your country at risk? Because for the past 200 years Islam has been at war with the culture of America, that’s why?

This Freedom House study exposes just one of the many hundreds of ways Islam has been infiltrating and changing the western culture to adopt Sharia law for the past 3 decades.

A new Freedom House study of Muslim textbooks finds that the Islamic madrassa is teaching its children to embrace Islamic supremacism, preparing them to enter a political system that teaches them to discriminate against women and to kill non-Muslims.

The study, "Discrimination and Intolerance in Muslim School Textbooks," is the most comprehensive to date of Wahhabist textbooks, analyzing 95 compulsory textbooks for grades one to 11. The main author of the study, Saeed Paivandi, is a sociologist at Paris-8 University and one of the few Western scholars to specialize in Islam’s pre-jihad education system.

"The discourse of the textbooks has not been written with the concept of equality of all human beings, as enshrined in the International Universal Declaration of Human Rights," the study concludes. "In the textbooks' reasoning, human beings cannot be equal with one another on this earth, in the same way that, on the day of reckoning, they will be subject to divine judgment for their identity and actions. The trend, based on the clear and official negation of the equality of human beings, created different positions for the various people in society. Some individuals are born first-class citizens, due to their identity, gender, and way of thinking, while others become second- and third-class citizens. Those who are excluded from the inside are victims of this discriminatory system.” In reading these textbooks based on the teachings of the Quran and the Hadith one can easily see where Hitler found his philosophy for Nazism

The lesson of Islamic supremacies also applies to the infiltration of Muslim textbooks throughout the U.S., which is not only to support terrorist groups throughout America, but is being introduced to American children in our public schools. For example, the Islamic culture religious studies textbook for eighth-grade instructs, " jihad is incumbent upon every one, the young, and the old, men, and women, everyone, absolutely everyone, must take part in this sacred battle of Global Jihad , fight to the best of his or her abilities, or assist our fighters.”

A seventh-grade textbook on the same subject says: "By taking note of the guidance and instructions provided by Islam, every Muslim youth must strike fear in the hearts of the enemies of God and their people through combat-readiness and skillful target shooting. He must always be ready to defend Islam, his honor, and faith and use all of his capabilities and power in this endeavor”.

The report places the present school text books coming from Iran via Saudi Arabia in the context of the country's ancient tradition of religious Muslim schools but finds major differences between the two. Iran's modern school curriculum, for example, teaches secular subjects such as science and political history, while the Khomeinist doctrine of Islam is cleverly and deceptively threaded through these subjects, as well.

The Freedom House study is not the first review of Iranian textbooks. Last year a Jerusalem-based think tank, the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education, did its own review, which concluded that Iran was preparing children to become radical martyrs.(Watch videos of educational propaganda for your children.) The Freedom House study takes a broader approach to the textbooks, but it also finds that martyrdom is encouraged in grades one through 11.

"In these textbooks, 31 lessons discuss martyrdom and death for the sake of religious or political beliefs. These lessons are mostly biographies or autobiographies of important religious figures of the past, including soldiers and officers of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution and the basij (paramilitary group)," the Freedom House study says.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Americans, because of their own personal priorities, involvements in the pursuit of careers, recreation, or sometimes just plain ignorance or even laziness, lead one from being properly informed in order to make intelligent decisions, to the absorption of intellectual, spiritual, and sociological infiltration of political correctness and international tolerance. The result of this deception and ignorance is the eventual loss of all the personal priorities that one has so diligently been in pursuit of.

While we may win the deceptive so-called war against terror in the Middle East, we are most certain to lose the war against the infiltration if Islamic ideologies here at home. As distasteful as the deportation and or incarceration of the Japanese and Germans in this country during the Second World War was, it guaranteed the protection of the home front while we fought the war abroad.

It makes little sense to save another country from its own demonic ideology while at the same time lose ones own country to that same Ideology. This however, is precisely what is happening right now, right here, in our own schools, in our own churches, in our governments local, state, and federal and throughout our entire society.

If one understandably pursues happiness, but in the process is ignorantly deceived by the enemy to ignore the obvious destruction of the very liberated foundation that is the source to enjoy the very freedom to peruse ones dreams; then ones pursuit of happiness becomes a moot point, and a useless endeavor…

de Andréa .

Friday, March 28, 2008

Cultural Infiltration

Charting the Progress of Islam, Toward it’s Goal of World Domination

By de Andrea

The following is an analysis of how Islamic infiltration (Islamic Cultural Jihad) surreptitiously progresses within a host culture. While I have not yet read Peter Hammond’s new book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam, the following is adapted from his book.

As George Santayana wrote: “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Regarding Islam, we don’t really have to look back hundreds of years to learn from history, all we need do is look at what is presently happening in Europe and especially in France and Great Britain over the past two decades.

Islam is a complete system.

Islam is not just a religion nor is it just a cult. Islam is a theocracy.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components. Islam is complete, Islam is all encompassing, totally invasive, completely oppressive, and demands totally subjugation.

Islamization occurs when there is a sufficient population of Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called "religious rights."

When politically correct and culturally tolerant diverse societies agree to "the reasonable" Muslim demands for their "religious rights," they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

Muslims do not, ever, assimilate, not ever.
Muslims will remain as separatists and immediately begin their agenda of changing the culture of the host country.

As long as the Muslim population is less than 1 % of any given country they will be regarded for the most part as a peace-loving minority while they begin their stealthy incremental infiltration into every aspect of the host country’s culture educational system and government. Islamic Cultural Jihad begins…United States -- Muslim 1.4% Australia -- Muslim 1.6% Italy -- Muslim 1.6% Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9% China -- Muslim 1%-2%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs: This is already well underway in the United States.Denmark -- Muslim 2% Germany -- Muslim 3.7% United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7% Spain -- Muslim 4% Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply, which because of the indoctrination of tolerance and political correctness is already happening in the United States. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is to establish Sharia law and convert the entire world to Islam
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
France -- Muslim 8% Philippines -- Muslim 5% Sweden -- Muslim 5% Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3% The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5% Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, terrorist Jihad will begin, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana -- Muslim 10% India -- Muslim 13.4% Israel -- Muslim 16% Kenya -- Muslim 10% Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing terrorist warfare:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40% Chad -- Muslim 53.1% Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:Albania -- Muslim 70% Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4% Qatar -- Muslim 77.5% Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide: Bangladesh -- Muslim 83% Egypt -- Muslim 90% Gaza -- Muslim 98.7% Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1% Iran -- Muslim 98% Iraq -- Muslim 97% Jordan -- Muslim 92% Morocco -- Muslim 98.7% Pakistan -- Muslim 97% Palestine -- Muslim 99% Syria -- Muslim 90% Tajikistan -- Muslim 90% Turkey -- Muslim 99.8% United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

A 100% will usher in the so-called peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim: Afghanistan -- Muslim 100% Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100% Somalia -- Muslim 100% Yemen -- Muslim 100%

There are approximately 1.7 Billion Muslims and growing world wide. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. A peaceful nation of Islam when the whole world is Islam is of course problematic. To satisfy their hate revenge and blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

A quote from the Book"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel And then Muslim against Muslim”. -- Leon Uris, "The Haj"

de Andréa

Thursday, March 27, 2008


If one ignorantly doesn’t know any different, one might become a spoiled brat. While Americans may have lost more than we now have in the way of rights and by definition most of our freedom, we however are still by comparison, the freest, most pampered, luckiest, richest people on Gods green earth. Yet we mumble and grumble in our unhappiness.

Jay sums it up!
Jay Leno puts it into perspective and makes us think about the pathetic negativity.

That's right, Jay Leno wrote this; it's the Jay Leno we don't often see....

By Jay Leno

'The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some poll data I found rather hard to believe. It must be true, given the source, right?
The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is headed, and 69 percent of the country is unhappy with the performance of the President. In essence, 2/3's of the citizenry just aren’t happy and want a change.
So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, ''What are we so unhappy about?''

Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter?
Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job?
Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time, and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?
Maybe it is the ability to drive from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move through each state?
Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter?
I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from around the world is just not good enough.
Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and provide services to help all, and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.
Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames thus saving you, your family and your belongings.
Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes , an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss.
This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents. Neighborhoods where 90 percent of teenagers own cell phones and computers.
How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world? Maybe that is what has 67 percent of you folks unhappy.
Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen. No wonder the world loves the U.S. , yet has a great disdain for its citizens.
They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have , and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.
I know, I know. What about the President who took us into war and has no plan to get us out? The President who has a measly 31 percent approval rating?
Is this the same President who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11? The President that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession?

Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks?
The Commander-In Chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me?
Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show?
Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad?
Think about it...are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the 'Media' told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day.
Make no mistake about it. The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom. There is currently no draft in this country. They didn't have to go. They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an ''other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discharge after a few days in the brig. So why then the flat-out discontentment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans?
Say what you want, but I blame it on the media. If it bleeds, it leads; and they specialize in bad news. Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts. How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner?
The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations. They offer what sells , and when criticized, try to defend their actions by 'justifying' them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O.J. Simpson to write a book about 'how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way'...Insane!
Stop buying the negativism you are fed everyday by the media. Shut off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage.
Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is exponentially more good than bad. We are among the most blessed people on Earth, and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative. 'With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, 'Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?'

Jay Leno 2007

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

The Defeat of Fools

Islamic terrorist forces in the Middle East have officially rewritten their international rulebook in a way designed so "they can't lose."

By de Andréa

What's even more worrisome is the widespread failure in the West even to realize this is happening. Hamas and Hezbollah fire from among civilians and use civilian homes for military purposes; Syria or Iran deploy disinformation, terrorist regimes pretend moderation, and there are plenty of suckers in the U.S. to take the bait.

Many believe that kind words and concessions can transform them; intransigence produces a response that if they won't give up, we must do so. Read the response from the Arch Bishop of Canterbury in the U.K. who has totally been absorbed by the cultural Jihad of Islam on February 11, 2008 The Archbishop said that “the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is unavoidable and that it would help introduce social cohesion” The sad truth about that statement is that he may be absolutely correct. Once a critical mile stone has been reached in the saturation and infiltration of Islam into the host culture, there will be no social cohesiveness whatsoever unless Sharia law and the theocracy of Islam is completely adopted.

Here is the Fatwa, eleven rules from the forces of Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, Iraqi insurgents, al-Qaida, Syria, the Taliban, and others including terrorist Arab nationalists for Islamic Jihad in the remainder of the world. This is really revealing as to how much our enemy understands and can surreptitiously manipulate us. These forces are not all exactly alike or allied but do follow a parallel set of rules quite different, to say the least, from how international affairs have been conducted in the past. After sorting out all the deception as to how Islam presidents it ‘self to the West, this is the underlying truth of some of the details of how Islam will defeat the “Western Fools”.

1. We'll never give up. No matter what you do, we will continue fighting. No matter what you offer we will keep attacking you. Since you can't win you should give up.

2. We're indifferent to pressure you put on us. We will turn this pressure against you. Against us, deterrence does not exist; diplomacy does not convince. Neither does the carrot buy us off, nor does the stick make us yield. There are no solutions that can end the conflict. You cannot win militarily nor make peace through diplomacy.

3. If you set economic sanctions we'll say you are starving our people in an act of "collective punishment.” Moreover, sanctions will cost you money and generate opposition among those who lose profits.

4. In response to military operations we'll attack your civilians. Casualties will undermine your internal support. We will try to force you to kill civilians accidentally. We won't care but will use this to persuade many that you are evil. Thus, we will simultaneously murder your civilians and get you condemned as human rights' violators.

5. If you try to isolate us we will use your own media and intellectuals against you. At times, we'll hint at moderation and make promises of change. We won't do so enough to alienate our own followers but enough to subvert yours. They will demand that you engage us, which means you making concessions for nothing real in exchange.

6. Talking to our own people, we foment hatred and demonize you. Speaking to the West, we will accuse you of fomenting hatred. We will hypocritically turn against you all the concepts you developed: racism, imperialism, failure to understand the "other," and so on. These, of course, are our ideas but your feelings of guilt, ignorance about us, and indifference to ideology will make you not notice that fact.

7. We will claim to be victims and "underdogs.” Because you are the stronger and more "advanced" that means you are the villains. We're not held responsible for our deeds or expected to live up to the same standards. There is no shortage of, to quote Lenin, "useful idiots" who will echo our propaganda.

8. Since our societies are weak, undemocratic, and have few real moderates, you will have to make deals with phony moderates and dictatorial regimes weakened by corruption and incompetence.

9. Even the less radical regimes, often our immediate adversaries, partly play into our hands. Due to popular pressure–plus their desire to mobilize support and distract attention from their own shortcomings–they trumpet Arab and Islamic solidarity. They denounce the West, blame all problems on Israel, and revile America, even as they accept your aid. They glorify interpretations of Islam not too far from ours. They cheer Iraqi insurgents, Hezbollah, and Hamas. They don't struggle against Iran getting nuclear weapons. They lay the basis for our mass support and recruits, as Lenin said selling us the rope to hang them as well as you.

10. There's no diplomatic solution for you, though you yearn to find one. There's no military solution for you, whether you try that or not. You love life, we love death; you are divided, we are united; you want to get back to material satisfaction, we are dedicated revolutionaries. We will outlast you.

11. Finally, our greatest weapon is that you truly don't understand all the points made above. You are taught, informed, and often led by people who simply don't comprehend what an alternative, highly ideological, revolutionary worldview means. In effect, we will try, and often succeed, to turn your "best and brightest" into the worst and dimmest who think you can persuade us, blame you for the conflicts, or expect that we will alter our course, and we will use those mistakes against you.

Listen to them, they are telling us how blind and deceived we are, we haven’t got a clue what Islam is, we are deceived fools, and if we continue in our deception of cultural tolerance and political correctness we will be defeated fools. This deceptive infiltration into the culture of the West is made possible because of a very powerful and totally underestimated Islamic doctrine found in the Quran. This is the doctrine of Taqiyyah, the Islamic deception (true lies) which Muslims are taught from childhood, and is at the very foundation of cultural Jihad (the surreptitious incremental takeover of a foreign culture)

To show how successful this deceptive Islamic ideological agenda is, and how it is taking over the future of America, The following seven statements were made by a typical brainwashed fool of a student at Georgia State Technical University in response to a resent speech by John Lewis . This pathetically deceived and indoctrinated student stood up and loudly and boldly proclaimed as if playing back a recording that was programmed into his brain…

(1) there is a long history of separation of church and state in Islam; (2) Islamic law is good; (3) whenever imposed, Islamic law has brought peace; (4) jihad is a “wonderful idea” and does not mean war; (5) Islamic Totalitarianism poses no threat, since 500 million Muslims reject terrorism; (6) the tax leveled against subjugated peoples is just, because they are protected by Muslims in return; (7) I am “ignorant of history” if I do not acknowledge the “truth” of these claims.

The success of Islam’s deception relies on the psychological, spiritual, and mental weaknesses of fools like this student, which are the future of America. One would hope that there were no more students like this in our collages, but unfortunately that would be deceptively naive. From K through 12 in our public schools all around America the tolerance of Islam and Sharia law is being incrementally introduced. Moreover by the time our students reach the collages and universities the cultural foundation of Islam will have already been laid.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Sharia law and the fundamental ideology of Islam is incompatible with any culture in the rest of the world. This is why one incremental inch given to the tolerance of Islam is a death sentence to ones own culture, because it is all downhill from there. There will not be peace until Islam and Sharia law is in control and we are all subjected to Allah their satanic god.

de Andréa

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Joseph’s Tomb

It is truly amazing that the children of Islam have absolutely no reason or rational, or is it something else?

By de Andréa

As much as I know about Islam I still catch myself looking at Islam through western eyes where what is good for the gander, is also good for the goose. Or vice versa… oh, you no what I mean.

In the wake of an attempt by Palestinians to burn down Joseph's Tomb – Judaism's third holiest site – Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah faction issued a statement denying it will help restore the shrine, referring to both the shrine and the biblical patriarch as "Muslim."

This is where the goose and the gander thing come in to play. Just try and burn down a Mosque or call a teddy bear Muhammad, or draw some funny pictures. Are you sure you want these people to have a NUKE ?

"Pay no attention to the rumors that we will work with Israel to restore the burial site of the holy Muslim Joseph," said the statement, issued from Nablus, the biblical city of Shechem. "We are going to guard this holy Muslim site." Oh yes, now it is a “Muslim Site”

Building at Joseph's Tomb site after Palestinian Authority took control in 2000

Joseph's Tomb is the believed burial place of the son of Jacob who was sold by his brothers into slavery and later became viceroy of Egypt.
Palestinian security officials in Nablus said Monday they were called to the tomb to find 16 burning tires inside the sacred structure. A Palestinian police official who inspected the site said there was some fire damage to the tomb.

He said the Palestinian Authority, fearing embarrassment, immediately formed a joint committee from the PA's Force 17, Preventative Security Services, and Palestinian intelligence, to find out who was behind the fire.

The move comes after Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced last week he would ask Israel's Defense Ministry to work with the PA to reconstruct and restore the tomb, parts of which were destroyed in 2000 by Palestinians, including known PA security officers.

Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, which granted nearby strategic territory to the Palestinians, Joseph's Tomb was supposed to be accessible to Jews and Christians. But following repeated attacks against Jewish worshippers at the holy site by gunmen associated with then-Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat's militias, then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak in October 2000 ordered an Israeli unilateral retreat from the area.

Within less than an hour of the Israeli retreat, Palestinian rioters overtook Joseph's Tomb and reportedly began to ransack the site. Palestinian mobs reportedly tore apart books, destroying prayer stands and grinding out stone carvings in the Tomb's interior. A Muslim flag was hoisted over the tomb.

Israel first gained control of Nablus and the neighboring site of Joseph's Tomb in the 1967 Six-Day War. The Oslo Accords signed by Arafat and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin called for the area surrounding the tomb site to be placed under Palestinian jurisdiction but allowed for continued Jewish visits to the site and the construction of an Israeli military outpost at the tomb to ensure secure Jewish access.

Gravestone at traditional burial site for biblical patriarch Joseph after it was ransacked by Palestinian mobs

Following the transfer of control of Nablus and the general area encompassing the tomb to the Palestinians in the early 1990s, there were a series of outbreaks of violence in which Arab rioters and gunmen from Arafat's Fatah militias shot at Jewish worshipers and the tomb's military outpost.

Six Israeli soldiers were killed, and many others, including yeshiva students, were wounded in September 1996 when Palestinian rioters and Fatah gunmen attempted to over take the tomb. Eventually, Israeli soldiers regained control of the site.

The Palestinians continued to attack Joseph's Tomb with regular shootings and the lobbing of firebombs and Molotov cocktails. Security for Jews at the site increasingly became more difficult to maintain. Rumors circulated in 2000 that Barak would evacuate the Israeli military outpost and give the tomb to Arafat as a "peacemaking gesture."

In early 2000, the Israeli army began denying Jewish visits to the tomb on certain days due to prospects of Arab violence. Following U.S.-mediated peace talks at Camp David in September 2000, Arafat returned to the West Bank and initiated his intifada. During one bloody week in October 2000, Fatah gunmen attacked the tomb repeatedly, killing two and injuring dozens, prompting Barak to order a complete evacuation of Judaism's third holiest site Oct. 6.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Millimeter by millimeter Islam will and is involved in the incremental takeover of everything, worse yet we are giving it to them. Whether it is in the Middle East or in the Middle West, Islam’s objective is to destroy and deny any evidence of any civilization except Islam. In other words Muslims want you to believe or at least admit that the earth began in A.D. 610, nothing occurred before or after that time. They are stuck in the seventh century A.D. and they want to reduce you to a slave, frozen in the time zone of Allah. Then the so-called peace of Islam will be upon us all, and we will all live together in darkness and in death.

Would we have allowed fascist Nazis in this country to teach their satanic garbage to our children in the 1943? Of course not! Then why do we allow Muslims to teach Islamofascism to our children in the 2008. (For the connection between Nazism and Islam Click here)

Bear in mind this is not just happening in the Middle East, it is happening all over the world including right here in America, in your governments, in your churches, in your synagogues, in your schools, in your neighborhoods, in your backyards and in your faces.

Does this oppressive regime sound like something you want to happen to you and to your children??? If not won’t you please join Brigitte Gabriel and thousands of others and Act For America in the fight to stop Islamic Cultural Jihad in America?

de Andréa

Monday, March 24, 2008


Americans are the most protected people on earth, and yet we are not protected from the most basic threat of an invading enemy.

By de Andréa

We are protected from injury in an auto accident by belts and the eruption of bags all over the front of us. We are protected while riding a motorcycle by forcing us to wear brain buckets. The FDA protects us from being poisoned by the pharmaceutical industry. Our children are protected from gang attacks by forcing our children not to wear gang colors. We are protected from ourselves by gun bans. We are protected from injury by safety features on machinery.
The government department of OSHA protects all employees; moreover, one department was not enough we have a state and a federal OSHA. The EPA protects even our environment, and the State Air Resources board as well as the local Air Quality Management Districts protects the air we breathe.

However when it comes to the most basic kind of protection, and the main purpose for the existence of the Federal Government, we have virtually no protection at all. Very carefully written by the “Constitutional Architects” is the now ignored constitutional law, which was the weight that tipped the scale for even the creation of the controversial central “Federal Government”

Article IV, section 4 of the US Constitution not only guarantees every State a Republican form of government which has since been overthrown, but it guarantees that the Federal Government will protect each State from Invasion, as well as domestic violence.

When the framers were contemplating the formation of a national or federal government, the fear was that it would dominate the individual States. After all, we had just fought a war for independence from a dominating government. Among many other things, the Framers realized the necessity for a central government if for no other reason, then for the mutual protection of the independent States.

Well that was then and this is now, as they say. The US Constitution, the highest most powerful law in America is the most ignored law in America. The reason it is, is that it is the only law governing the government. Moreover, the Federal Government is now more powerful than the law, and is now dominating the States. Sound familiar?

This invasion that the architects made sure was identified in the Constitution, purposely was included in a general sense. [ INVASION ] That’s it, no specifics, meaning any kind of invasion. Economic, Military, Disease, Criminal, any kind of invasion.

Today we have an invasion in this country that has not only gone unchecked but it is encouraged and promoted by our federal government. It has nevertheless not gone unnoticed.

A fence of protection around the United States would not be used to keep unwanted people in, but to keep unwanted people out. So who are unwanted people? These are people with incurable communicable diseases, or violent criminals, or gang members, drug smugglers, free loaders, how about Islamic terrorists and infiltrators just to name a few. Yes the United States Federal Government encourages all these kind of people from everywhere in the world to waltz into your country and take your welfare, your jobs, to steal your hard earned money, to steal your culture, and to take and kill your children.

These are not just undocumented peaceful warm fuzzy people as the Government has conveniently reduced them to. This is what the framers meant by an INVASION. By reducing these enemies of America to a warm fuzzy people who love America and just “want to do the jobs that Americans won’t do,” they think they can side step constitutional law that requires the Federal Government to protect this nation from an invasion of any kind.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This invasion has little to do with multicultural tolerance; this is the abuse of the fundamental character of America. Because of this illegal invasion of our country, our schools have abandoned the Judeo Christian morels and values, and replaced them with the agenda of our enemy. The obvious result of this will be that America will in the future adopt the fundamental foundation of Islam, hate, oppression, fascism, dominance, slavery, dictatorship, hopelessness and death.

If this is the future that you want for your children, then do nothing, Islam will do it for you. However if you enjoy liberty, freedom, rights, respect, hope, and living your own life, moreover, if you want this for your children as well, you might want to contact your representative and ask,-- no, tell them, to do their Constitutional duty of protecting this Nation from a foreign invasion. Article IV section 4, it’s the law…

de Andréa

Saturday, March 22, 2008

What the Framers Knew

Over the past 200 plus years, America has forgotten most everything that the Framers of our Constitution knew so well…

By de Andréa

The Founders of this country knew from their history that a democracy wouldn’t work, partially because of the fall of the “Athenian Republic” which evolved into a democracy some 2,000 years earlier. One might wonder then, why did the Founders create a democracy in America. The truth is, they didn’t...

No, the original form of American government that the Founders created was a ”Constitutional Republic”, with all the built in safe guards to keep it from incrementally falling into the trap of a true democracy. It was somewhat democratically run as opposed to a parliamentary run government as in most of Western Europe, but it was never meant to be a democracy.

“Well intended governments, if allowed to ignore the reason and intentions of the architects and divert, even in the slightest, from its original foundation will eventually find itself slipping into the abyss of tyranny”. de Andréa, 2008

If one dares to look back in our history, one would find a very different country. For example a country whose government wouldn’t think of interfering in the private business of its citizens, or taxing personal income so it could be used to grow government and buy votes.

In May 31, 1913 the Federal Government abandon the Republic and passed the 17th Amendment, officially changing forever this free nation from a Complex Republic into a Simple Republic much like the style of the old Soviet Union. States rights were lost and we were plunged headlong into a democracy of which our Fore-fathers warned us was the vilest form of government because it always lead to socialism and ended in tyranny.

Today, not only do we not have a Constitutional Republic, but we do not have a Democracy either. We have surreptitiously and incrementally evolved from a republic to a democracy and to the very beginnings of social fascism.

Also in February 25 of 1913 our government abandon the peoples liberty and with the illegal ratification of only four States enacted the 16th Amendment creating the Internal revenue service, and they have been robbing from the rich and giving to the poor ever since. This of course does not help the poor but creates a dependent class of citizens. (Buying of votes) One might think, well isn’t is what Robin-hood did in Nottingham England and he was a good guy… But Robin did not rob from the rich; he took back from the government what was stolen from the poor and returned it, with of course a slight commission for himself and his band of thieves.

The constitution is dead, so says the Supreme Court
Not too long ago if one remembers, some members of Congress as well as a couple of our Supreme Court Justices made a statement to the effect that our Constitution is, and should be a living document, meaning that it should evolve and change with the times. We should for example incorporate laws and statutes that have an international flavor. Of course the truth be known, this is precisely what we had been doing, and why we have lost our Republic. Moreover, it is why we will lose our country, our freedom, our liberty, and end up just as the third world countries that we are attempting to emulate with an international flavor. According to the Supreme Court if the Constitution doesn’t evolve into something else, it is dead. The truth is that it is dying because it has been evolving into something else.

So how long do we have?
About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the “Athenian Republic” some 2,000 years earlier, should we fall as the Athenians did from a Republic into a true democracy…
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. (Welfare and the redistribution of wealth, a true socialistic philosophy) From that moment on, the majority will always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, (Earmarks) with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to an evolving loose fiscal policy, which has always in history been followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence”:

1. >From bondage to spiritual faith; 1500 to 1600
2. >From spiritual faith to great courage; 1600 to 1700
3. >From great courage to liberty; 1700 to 1800
4. >From liberty to abundance; 1800 to 1900
5. >From abundance to complacency; 1900 to 1950
6. >From complacency to apathy; 1950 to 2000
7. >From apathy to dependence; 2000 to 2030
8. >From dependence back into bondage' 2030 to 2050
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 U.S. Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Gore: 19 Bush: 29
Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000 Bush: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million Bush: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2 Bush 2.1
Professor Olson adds: “In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Gore’s territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements or living off various forms of government welfare...’ Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the apathy and dependency phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reachedthe 'governmental dependency' phase. Once the majority reaches the dependency phase we will have come full circle. We will be back in the bondage of dependency, and on the road to tyranny.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called “Undocumented Workers’ and they vote and they will, then in fewer than 10 years, we can say goodbye to the America we have come to know and love.

THE BOTTOM LINE: But then, what do I know, I just read history, philosophy and have been told that I am very intuitive. For our sake and that of our children and the sake of our country, I certainly hope that I don’t know what I am talking about.

”If My people who are called by My name shall humble themselves and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land”. God… 2 Chronicles 7:14

de Andréa

Friday, March 21, 2008

The Forbidden Picture

Boy punished for T-shirt with gun image, reads the headlines of a Lancaster Pa newspaper

By de Andréa

Not only do the America haters want to prohibit guns in America they want to outlaw pictures of them as well. Or is it the T-shirts they want to outlaw? I’m not sure.

The family of a middle school student who was given detention for wearing a T-shirt bearing the image of a gun has filed a federal freedom of speech lawsuit against the school district.

Doesn’t the department of education know that we have a constitutional right to keep and bear T-shirts…I mean arms, even pictures of them???

So, when the Second Amendment is violated the First Amendment is violated as well. The truth be known, if the Second Amendment is violated, all of ones rights are violated. This, because all of our rights depend on the Second Amendment. Remember it is …”necessary to the security of a free State” (Emphasis mine)

It seems that 14 year old desperado Donald Miller III went to Penn Manor High School in December of 2007 wearing a T-shirt he said was intended to honor his uncle, a U.S. Army soldier fighting in Iraq. Well of course for the America haters, honoring a U.S. Army soldier alone should be at least cause for, immediate dismissal.

The shirt bears the image of a military sidearm and on the front pocket it says "Volunteer Homeland Security.” On the back, over another image of the weapon, are the words "Special issue Resident Lifetime License - United States Terrorist Hunting Permit - Permit No. 91101 - Gun Owner - No Bag Limit.” Don’t you just love it???

Dis’[ing] a terrorist or blaming the 9/11 attack on Islam is of course politically incorrect. I mean it is not part of the doctrine of Tolerance and Multiculturalism. It is just not proper cricket, as our little British friends say across the pond.

Officials at the Millersville School told the boy to turn his shirt inside out. When Miller refused, he got two days of detention. Wow, I wonder what they would have done to the poor boy if he had worn a T=shirt with an American flag on it. It probably would have been bonfire time. No, I mean for the boy! Don’t they burn you at the stake for that now? They do in Berkley.

His parents, Donald and Tina Miller of Holtwood, have accused, in a lawsuit, the Penn Manor School in Millersville District, of violating their son's First Amendment rights with a "vague Orwellian policy" that stifles both patriotism and free speech. I think that might be the whole idea of enforcing that Orwellian policy, don’t you? Aren’t free speech, guns, flags, and patriotism just part of the outdated past?

The attorney for the school district said,”the school must create a safe environment for students in the post-Columbine era, and bringing even the image of a gun to school violates the district's policy of a safe gun free environment”. I can’t help wondering though, how safe is a gun free environment? Aren’t gun free environments where all the school children are killed?
Moreover, I wonder if the attorney and or the officials at the school district recognize that it wasn’t a picture or even a gun that killed and injured all those kids at Columbine, as I remember it, it was two of their classmates that committed all of those murders. But then what do I know, I flunked brainwash already in the first grade.

"There's a much higher level of sensitivity these days," Penn Manor attorney Kevin French said. "But it's based on reality."

Man! I wonder just whose reality is he talking about… Mmmm…

THE BOTTOM LINE: One would have thought that with all the programming and brain washing with the new hate America indoctrination that is going on in our Public Schools these days; that the thought of doing such a terrible distasteful and dangerous act as displaying a picture of a gun and especially the patriotic gesture of honoring ones uncle fighting for our enemy in Iraq would have never crossed the mind of young Donald Miller. Daaa, the teach…must not have learned him too good…

I guess I have made enough of an ********out of these jerks, don’t you???.
I shouldn’t really do this, it is too easy.

But I love it so…

de Andréa

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Shariah Law Comes Again to Harvard U

While Americans stand by and watch their country, their freedom, and their rights slip incrementally away, Islamic Cultural Jihad in America is still moving along as planned

By de Andréa

This is of course good news if one is a Muslim. Or even if one has the absence of thought such as an Agnostic and doesn’t care one way or another. But if one is an Atheist or has any other philosophy or beliefs other than the oppressive rule of Islam, and or loves freedom of choice, the direction of this Ideologue is nothing short of disastrous.

On March 15th I posted a story about Shariah Law Coming to Australian Universities titled Islam Demands, clamoring for classes to be scheduled to accommodate prayer times, and for segregated male and female dinning and recreation facilities. Today it comes again to America, Harvard University after incrementally giving into previous Islamic Demands has once again and again given in and has adopted a policy of banning men from one of its gyms a few hours each week, to accommodate Muslim women. This is Shariah Law preempting the culture of America. .

This comment made by Ola Aljawhary one of the Muslim women who requested the change gives one, just a peek, into how Muslims think: “The majority should be willing to compromise," she said. "I think that's just basic courtesy. We must show tolerance and respect for all others.” Nice sounding words, but is this “respect for all others,” not just Muslims, and being “willing to compromise,” and isn’t “tolerance,” a two way street?

As some of the Brits, the French, and the Dutch have learned, the answer is “no.” When the Archbishop of Canterbury stated that the imposition of Shariah law is “unavoidable,” and necessary for “social cohesion” in England, without knowing it, he was also acknowledging that the answer is a resounding “no.”

It is obvious that it is just a matter of time until all “Public Indoctrinational Institutions” will incrementally be completely under oppressive Muslim Shariah Law, and everyone else’s rights, beliefs, and liberties will be quintessentially subordinate to the Muslim ideology.

Do Islamic countries allow for free expression of religion by non-Muslims? Do they “tolerate” those whose beliefs are contrary to those of Islam? Do they “compromise” with non-Muslims? No, no, and no. Why not? Because doctrinal Islam asserts not only the supremacy of Allah and Islam as a religious belief, but the supremacy of the political ideology embedded within Islam that dictates how a society and its government and laws should be ordered. It brooks no tolerance or compromise.

If you accept, as do all Muslims, what the Quran and the Hadith teach about the supremacy of Islam and Allah, about not only the right, but the duty of all Muslims to forcefully subordinate all other beliefs to Islam and Allah, then it is perfectly logical to conclude that Muslims have the right to demand accommodations for their beliefs that subordinate the beliefs of everyone else to theirs.

This is the theological rationale and justification for Islamic Jihad, whether by violence or the infiltration of “Cultural Jihad” – the subversion and ultimate conquering of a society from within by means other than physical violence. For what is Islamic Jihad but the call to subjugate “infidels” to the “supreme” religion of Islam and Allah?

What may seem as a harmless test of Harvard's famed open-mindedness is just one of many steps toward the ultimate total uncompromising control of Shariah Law. The university has today banned men from one of its gyms for a few hours a week to accommodate Muslim women who say it offends their sense of modesty to exercise in front of the opposite sex. Tomorrow it will be yet another demand of Muslim oppression imposed upon everyone else in the attempt to drag the whole world back to the seventh century under the oppression of Shariah law, we are committing tolerance suicide ...

The policy is already unpopular with many on campus, including some women who consider it sexist.

"I think that it's incorrect in a college setting to institute a policy in which the majority of the campus gets wronged or denied a resource that's supposed to be for everyone, for the sake of a few" said student Lucy Caldwell, who also wrote a column in The Harvard Crimson newspaper critical of the new hours.

The trial policy went into effect Feb. 4, about a month after a group of six Muslim women, with the support of the Harvard College Women's Center, asked the university for the special hours, spokesman Robert Mitchell said.

"We get special requests from religious groups all the time and we try to honor them whenever possible," Mitchell said, noting that the school has already designated spaces for Muslim and Hindu students to pray. The truth is that when Jews or Christians request special accommodations, the nonexistent “Separation of Church and State Law” is evoked, and accommodations are denied.

No men are allowed in the gym between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. on Mondays, and between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Even the staff during those times are all women.

The special hours allow the Muslim women, who adhere to traditional dress codes by covering their hair and most of their skin while in public, to dress more appropriately for exercising, said Susan Marine, director of the women's center.

"It's a pretty big breach of their moral and religious code for a man to see them with their hair uncovered and it's just not possible for them to be in a mixed environment," she said.When student Kareem Shuman showed up to work out at the gym on Monday, he was turned away but said he didn't mind. "Knowing it was requested by women of my faith -- it's very understandable to me," said Shuman, 21, who figured he'd just come back later for his workout.

Other men find the new hours inconvenient to class schedules. Nick Wells, a junior who wrote an opinion piece in the Crimson criticizing the policy, suggested setting aside one room for women. "It's not that I am opposed to the idea of helping people in religious groups or women in general, but I just think Harvard is not being fair to people like me who have other classes to attend during gym hours for men.

An Associated Press reporter who went to the gym Monday did not even see any Muslim women entering. Efforts to reach some of the women who requested the policy through the Women's Center were unsuccessful. The reason for this, is that it is not the need for segregation, but the Islamic agenda of securing one more Shariah law.

Kent Blumenthal, executive director of the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association, which has 660 member colleges and universities nationwide, said he could not think of any other institution with a similar policy. "It seems in some ways contrary to the purpose of campus recreational programs, which is all about access," he said.

Harvard's policy is no different from commercial gyms that cater partially or even exclusively to women, said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, a known terrorist support group, “The Muslim bashers portray it as the world coming to end, but if women have a couple hours a week to work out in private, I don't see it as a major issue, he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: While the Muslim terrorist Ibrahim Hooper may be correct, in this case, if one separated it from the context of all the rest of the surreptitious and incremental Islamic demands is not a major Issue. But it is not an unusual isolated case; it is one in a string of carefully orchestrated changes in the culture of our collage campuses. Moreover this same Infiltration of Islamic Shariah law is incrementally taking precedence over our local, State and Federal laws as well.

Remember the turtle beat the hare with slow and carefully placed steps…

de Andréa

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Lights On?

Yes the lights may slowly be coming on. Today Sean Hannity, one of the Nations self-appointed watchdogs, was talking about the possible deception of Barack Obama.

By de Andréa
March 19, 2008

Today on his radio show, Sean Hannity was playing sound-bites of sermons from Black Church Pastors such as Reverend Meeks, Jeremiah Wright and the Reverend Al Sharpton as well as others from all over the Midwest and East coast that have and have had over the years, connections with Obama. All without exception were vomiting up hate and contempt for White America, or any kind of America that didn’t subscribe to the Black agenda of the destruction of the “White Enemy”.

This, as well as Obama’s connection to the “Black Panthers” and the Weatherman (organization) or now the “Weather Underground” a far left wing Anti-American organization of the 1960’s as well as Louis Farrakhan the Black Muslim leader of America. It was interesting to hear Sean flat out question whether or not Obama had deceived the American public by failing to exercise full disclosure of his sorted past which has been dribbling out a little at a time over the past year.

No… the media reported him, if you remember as the clean, articulate, black candidate. Articulate… no doubt, black… some say not black enough, but clean… well, it is sure that his unwashed laundry is beginning to spill out of its secret container.

Of course the lying hate America “Main Stream Media” isn’t going to report the truth about their favorite son. Especially if it reveals that Barack Hussein Obama’s Black agenda of the destruction of White America exactly Parallels the Islamic Ideology of killing and murdering all the Infidels of the world until they are subjugated to Islam.

I have to admit that I was totally ignorant about the many so-called “Christian black Churches” in America whose fundamental teachings paralleled the ideologies of Islam. Given Obama’s Muslim background however it isn’t a surprise that he would gravitate to this kind of hate America philosophy.

THE BOTTOM LINE: With all of this cover-up of who Barack Obama has been for the past twenty years, one has to wonder about the sanity of the Democrat party of even the consideration of running a candidate like Barack Hussein Obama. It just may go to show how really off track the left has become as well as just generally how uninformed the American public has become.

It is getting scary…

de Andréa

Is Wright a Black Muslim?

The theology and agenda of Obama’s friend and pastor, which is to “destroy 'the white enemy”, mirrors Black Muslim Fundamentalism. “If God is not for us and against whites then we had better kill him” says Jeremiah Wright.

By de Andréa

Barack Obama’s long time friend and counselor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has defended himself against charges of anti-Americanism and racism by referring to his foundational philosophy, the "black liberation theology " of scholars such as James Cone, who regard Jesus Christ as a "black Messiah" /Muslim, and blacks as "the chosen people" who will only accept a god/Allah who assists them in their aim of destroying the "white enemy"/Infidels.

Note the Black Muslim robe that the “Imam Muhammad” Jeremiah Wright is wearing.

The deception of Jeremiah Wright becomes self-evident when one can see the connection between “Black Islam” and the fraud of Pastor Wright at the Chicago based so-called “Trinity United Church of Christ”

"If God is not for us and against white people," writes Wright’s Mentor James Cone, "then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not obey the black community."

The fundamental agenda of Islam and Obama’s Pastor and leader is precisely the same, and as Nazism, with only few deceptive modifications. Black Islam has simply changed the identification of the enemy from Infidel (all non believers) to the entire white race, just as Hitler changed the identification to Jews and non Arians to suit his needs. A rose by any other name is still just a rose.

Reverend Wright, as in Islam, preaches no love, charity, or benevolence for the infidel, only hate. According to the fundamental truth of Christianity, even if the white race was the enemy of the black race, the teachings of Christ reflect only love for ones enemies, but alas as in Islam, there is only hate in the heart of Jeremiah Wright, because his god is Allah the god of hate. As Wright says he would murder God of he didn’t hate the infidel whites.

Wright has not talked to the media since video segments of his sermons over the past decade surfaced last week – including the one in 2003 in which he said blacks must damn America in Gods name

Obama, who has spoken of his pastor of more than 20 years as “his mentor and moral compass”, wants to talk about what Wright deceptively is, rather than what he says, by referring to him as a "respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago."

Christ is black he says, therefore not because of some cultural or psychological need of black people, but because and only because Christ really enters into our world where the poor and the blacks are despised, disclosing that he is with them enduring humiliation and pain and transforming oppressed slaves into liberating servants.

Rather than viewing God as a sovereign being who does as he wills according to his purposes, Cone insists God must do what we want him to do, or we must reject him.
What the black community wants, Cone says, is for God to assist in its goal of destroying "the white enemy,." The black Muslims Infidel.

Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

Is America too blind to notice the similarity of the Quote, “To destroy the enemy (the infidel ) by any means necessary” straight out of the Quran and the teachings of Islam, to Cone’s quote about the agenda of the Black Community “to destroy their oppressors…” etc..

While Obama tries to wiggle out of the 20 year connection between him and his Pastor, Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago has removed from the "About Us" page of its website a section outlining its radical belief system for blacks.

Despite having been at the church for more than two decades, Obama said he was not in attendance when Wright made any of the statements and never heard such talk in private conversations.

"Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy," Obama said. "I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue."

Isn’t it interesting that for 20 years Obama has aligned himself with the philosophy of Reverend Wright but now when it is exposed for what it is, he denounces it? But does this simply undo 20 years of radical teaching, indoctrination, and programming to this way of thinking? I wouldn’t think so; a Lyon does not become just a house cat because it is now more convenient.

Wright has now stepped down from his formal role in Obama's campaign, as a member of his African American Religious Leadership Committee.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I have often said in one way or an other; that if it looks, acts, and sounds like a Lyon especially if for twenty years it runs, eats and romps with Lyons, one has to admit the possibility that it just might be a Lyon. One must remember that Islam is a deception even the Muslims are deceived, brown yellow white or black they all have the same agenda and that is to subjugate the world to Islam and Allah their god.

Can we really take the chance that Obama who pretends to be a kitty cat who all of his life has lived with Lyons, has been taught by Lyons and has only now because it is not supportive of his ambition, is not a deceptive Lyon.

Meow… Roar, I mean Purr, just don’t get to close to the sharp end…

de Andréa

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Islam Demands

The curious thing about giving in to Muslim demands is that it just leads to another demand, until everything left alive belongs to Islam.

de Andréa

A story ran in The Australian Higher Education Publication. I share it with you because such requests for unreasonable accommodations are being repeated over and over again in the countries of Western Europe, and are rapidly becoming more commonplace here in America.

In the story below, Muslim students want classes to be rescheduled to fit in with their prayer timetables, as well as separate male and female eating and recreational areas established.

Imagine the havoc wreaked on our society, if public universities were to accommodate such unreasonable requests as these from Muslims. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Wicca’s, etc., etc. etc., would then rightfully step up and ask for unreasonable accommodations for their beliefs as well. Yet it seems that, not only are more and more Muslims around the world demanding - such accommodations, it is clear they believe they have every right to such accommodations.

Why is this you ask? Because it says so in the Quran. In Islam, the government, the schools, the businesses, the personal hygiene, the food, the religion, everything falls under Sharia law. Yes but, this is not Islam you say, oh ho, my infidelic ignorant friend, you don’t understand the whole world is Islam and will bow to Allah and become Muslim. How do I know this, because it says so in the Quran and 1.6 billion Muslims say so. Do you really think that 300 million people and 20 million illegal aliens in America are going to tell 1.7 billion angry Muslims that their book is a fraud, and their god is the devil, and that they are deceived? Wait, I thought you said 1.6 billion, yes, but that was 30 seconds ago. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world and it is also the fastest growing religion in America.

But alas, the world listens not.
The U.S. has already begun this downward spiral toward the slippery slope of Muslim appeasement. We have installed mosques in our airports, in our military, and in our universities, as well as foot washing facilities. We in America are just a heartbeat behind Europe and Australia toward the mastication of the west, by this 7th century demonic theocracy.
Simultaneously, it does not occur to these Muslims that requests like those in the story below blatantly infringe on the rights and beliefs of other students, professors, and staff. Or if it does, the attitude is that the rights and beliefs of others must give way to the practice of their Islamic faith.

Which begs this question again: Why?
Why do these Muslims believe they have the right to subordinate the rights and beliefs of others? It is because such beliefs emanate from Allah their demonic god, Sharia law, and Qu'ranic doctrines, of the Islamic supremacy and forceful subjugation of all other beliefs to that supremacy.

After all, if you accept what the Quran and the Hadith teach about the supremacy of Islam and Allah, not only the right, but the duty of all Muslims to forcefully subordinate an subjugate all other beliefs to Islam and Allah, then it is perfectly logical to conclude that you have the right to demand accommodations for your beliefs and subordinate the beliefs of everyone else to yours.

You see, the Muslim mind does not work like the Western mind and that is why this theological rationale is baffling to the West. Moreover, we do not yet understand that one benevolent accommodation only leads to another demand, until all the world is Islam and subject to Sharia law.

This is the theological rationale and justification for Islamic Jihad, whether by violence or "Cultural Jihad" - the subversion and ultimate conquering of a society from within by means other than physical violence. For what is Jihad but the struggle of Islam to subjugate all the world to the "supreme" religion of Islam and Allah?

It is the one reason why sociologists and authors who are studying the migration of Islam around the globe regularly note that Muslims do not "assimilate" into societies to which they migrate that are not Muslim. Even when they are in a small minority in a society, Muslims will always demand special accommodations that no other religious belief in that society would demand.

Therefore, even if a Muslim denounces "terror" and the concept of "jihad," it is a deception, because at the same time he demands unreasonable accommodations for his beliefs that result in the direct subordination of the rights and beliefs of others to his Islamic beliefs, he in effect acts as a "warrior" for Islamic jihad, whether he acknowledges it or not. It is just a different approach to Jihad, it is called “Cultural Jihad”, and the process where by he implements this infiltration of Cultural Jihad is the “doctrine of Taqiyyah”, (the deception of true lies) moreover the end result is the same.

And as the Brits have witnessed, the more a society submits to these demands, the more emboldened the militant Muslims become and the more demands they make. It is a small wonder the Archbishop of Canterbury recently stated that the imposition of Sharia law in Great Britain was "unavoidable" and necessary for "social cohesion.” This is in fact true, if one desires to have any kind of cohesion with Islam; one must convert or be a slave of Islam. .

In submitting to Muslim demands for accommodations for their beliefs, a society communicates to the Muslim that he is correct and that his belief in the supremacy of Islam and Allah is justified. This is why submitting to cultural jihad is every bit as dangerous as submitting to violent, militant, jihad.
Here is the article
Muslims want universities to fit prayer time
Richard Kerbaj and Milanda Rout
February 25, 2008

MUSLIM university students want lectures to be rescheduled to fit in with prayer timetables and separate male and female eating and recreational areas established on Australian campuses.
International Muslim students, predominantly from Saudi Arabia, have asked universities in Melbourne to change class times so they can attend congregational prayers. They also want a female-only area for Muslim students to eat and relax.

But at least one institution has rejected their demands, arguing that the university is secular and it does not want to set a precedent for requests granted in the name of religious beliefs.

La Trobe University International chief officer John Molony said several students had approached the Bundoora institution about rearranging class times to fit in with daily prayers.
Mr Molony said the university was attempting to "meet the needs" of an increasing number of Muslim international students, including doubling the size of the prayer room on campus.
La Trobe University International College director Martin Van Run said that although it was involved in discussions with the Muslim students who had made the requests, the university was not planning to change any timetables.

"That would seriously inconvenience other people at the college and it is not institutionally viable," he told The Australian. "We are a secular institution ... and we need to have a structured timetable."

Mr Van Run said that Saudi students were fully aware that the university was secular before coming to study there. "They know well in advance the class times," he said.A spokesman for RMIT University would neither confirm nor deny reports that Muslim students had requested timetable changes.

One university source told The Australian that the requests by Muslim international students for timetable changes included a petition.

"Some of the students would prefer that lecture times were organised so it would be easy for them to attend prayers," he said. "But it wouldn't be a good precedent to set."Islamic leaders yesterday backed the push by Muslim students to have their lectures arranged to accommodate prayer sessions, but said such a move would be essential only for congregational Friday prayers.
Female Muslim leader Aziza Abdel-Halim said yesterday it was a religious duty for those who followed Islam to preach with their fellow believers on Fridays.

But the former senior member of John Howard's Muslim reference board said there was nothing in Islam that indicated men and women be segregated when it came to educational activities.
"There's nothing in Islam that says there should be complete segregation, especially in educational institutions," said Sister Abdel-Halim.

She said afternoon prayers for Muslims - Zhohor, at 1.10pm, and Asr, at 4.50pm - could be performed until 10 minutes before the following daily prayer, so it was more appropriate to alter prayer times than lecture schedules.

"It's reasonable to ask for the lectures to be shifted around on Friday," Sister Abdel-Halim said. "But if it's going to cause havoc with the timetable, I don't think it's really feasible to ask for every single prayer to be catered for."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Instead of an appropriate ‘NO it isn’t going to happen” or the “read my lips” maneuver… the preverbal reasoning and logic is articulated. When will the West learn that benevolence only shows a Muslim that one is weak? Moreover the inner drive of Islam to subjugate the Infidel is strengthened with more and more demands until Sharia law is totally established.

One would think that after the continual demands of the Palestinians for example that we would have eventually learned that meeting more demands just means meeting more and more demands. The only objective that the Palestinians see is the total Islamic control of Israel. So the unrelenting demands continue toward that goal.

The same Goal exists anywhere there are Muslims. They infiltrate, they make incredible demands until Sharia law is established. This is their goal, it has been for 1400 years, and it will always be their goal until all the world is Islam.

Yes it really is, as simple as that…

de Andréa

Friday, March 14, 2008

A Covenant with the Devil

History, if Ignored may in fact destructively repeat itself.

By de Andréa

Note the Bishops hailing Hitler as the god of this world.
So soon we forget, in 1933 the Catholic Church entered into a covenant with the Nazi régime. In 2008 the Church of England endorses Islamic Sharia law as the Law of Great Britain.

The Concordat between the Vatican and the Nazis


Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) signs the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican at a formal ceremony in Rome on 20 July 1933. Nazi Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen sits at the left, Pacelli in the middle, and the Rudolf Buttmann sits at the right.

The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler and the Nazi government in the eyes of Catholicism, Christianity, and the world.

“Adoption of Islamic Sharia law in Britain is now unavoidable”, said the Archbishop of Canterbury

The Archbishop of Canterbury has in 2008 said that “the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is unavoidable and that it would help introduce social cohesion”

Click here for the whole story

So is history repeating itself? Well as they say, “if it walks like a duck”…
In 1933 no one except maybe Churchill and certainly no one in the Vatican, read Mein Kampf. Today no one, except of course the Muslims, is reading the Quran, especially not the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Unlike Hitler’s third Reich with the all out war to capture all of Europe, today’s Islam is instead stealthily and incrementally infiltrating the societies of Western Countries. The agenda is the same; the Ideology of Muhammad’s Islam was actually the source philosophy for Hitler’s Nazism.

I do not see a decisive difference between what went on with the Nazi deception in the 30’s and what is being played out with Islam on the world stage today. We have the same historical agenda being repeated, not just once again but twice again and we are being sucked into the trap of Allah for yet a third time. (The first time was of course before the Crusades at around 900 AD).

In AD 900 I could understand falling for the deception of Islam, after all the Europeans had no history to speak of to fall back on or to learn from, even though one would think that they would have figured it out before 300 years had gone by. But just what was our excuse in the 30’s, what’s more what is our excuse today??? America as a Nation has been confronted with the bullying if Islam for more than two hundred years now, and we still haven’t got it figured out, moreover, we have the internet, “The Information Highway”, I mean, come on…we haven’t got another 100 years.

Islam declared war on the United States 200 years ago.
The ruthless barbarism of the Nation of Islam is certainly not new to the United States of America. More than two hundred years ago the newly established United States made its first attempt to fight an overseas battle to protect its private citizens by building an international coalition against an unconventional enemy, moreover, it still continues today. Then, the enemies were Muslim pirates and piracy. The focus of the United States and a proposed international coalition was the Islamic Barbary Pirates of Tripoli in North Africa.

After the United States won its independence in the treaty of 1783, it had to protect its own commerce against dangers such as the Tripoli Barbary pirates of Islam. As early as 1784 Congress followed the tradition of the European shipping powers and appropriated $80,000 as tribute to the Barbary States. Thomas Jefferson soon discovered that paying the slaves “Jizya-Tax” to the Muslims was like pouring water down a dry well. Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America's minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress.

As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter,” I think it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war. Paying tribute will merely invite more demands. The only solution is a strong navy that can reach the Muslim pirates”, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: "The Barbary States must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both, it will be easier to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them."

When Jefferson became president in 1801 he refused to accede to Tripoli's demands for an immediate payment of $225,000 as well as an annual payment of $25,000. The Islamic pasha of Tripoli then declared war on the United States. Although as secretary of state and vice president he had opposed developing an American navy capable of anything more than coastal defense, President Jefferson dispatched a squadron of naval vessels to the Mediterranean. As he declared in his first annual message to Congress, “I have sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean.” . . .

One cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785. When they inquired, “by what right did the Barbary States prey upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers.” It was then that America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged Islam’s authority were sinners, and that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” Source—Wikipedia

It seems nothing has changed since then, except America’s ignorance.

One can easily see how early on, America learned how to deal with Islam, John Adams knew that compromising, giving in to their demands, or being tolerant of Islam was just opening the door to a wild river of destruction, moreover, the only action Islam would respect would come out of the end of a cannon. How did he know that???

Why then, have we regressed back to the blindness of the Europeans of 900 AD?

In the words of Thomas Jefferson July 11, 1786, “I think it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war.” Why did he say that? Did he know something then, that we don’t know today? Well, one thing he knew for sure is that the Muslims are liars; at least these Muslims were liars. The demanded bribe was paid (the Slave-Jizya-Tax) to leave our ships alone and the return of the hostages and guess what? Yes they lied and didn’t leave our ships alone and didn’t return our sailors.

So why do we continue to make peace with the so-called Palestinians, over and over and over again? Because I guess, unlike Jefferson who obviously learned the first time, we, on the other hand, are stuck on stupid. Apparently we, as the Europeans of 900 AD have another hundred years to go. I can’t help but wonder if Jefferson read the Quran…

If Jefferson didn’t, it is sure that John Quincy Adams did, he had this to say about Islam…

“In the seventh century of the Christian era a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad] the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an imposter, proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of Mosaic Law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.... Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant… While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace on earth and good will towards men.” John Quincy Adams (Emphasis is Mine) source ---Wikipedia

To enter into peace negotiations with Muslims is no less than making a covenant with the devil. We have known this for a thousand years, and yet we blindly continue down the same ignorant path to certain destruction. Why; --- is still the Question?

Denial is what paves the path for Islam to deceive the “Western Mind”, denial of anything greater than ourselves. Note that Adams refers to Allah the god of Muhammad and of Islam as “an Imposter, a fraudulent spirit, who proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven”. If one is in denial of heaven or the existence of God the creator of all things, then one is vulnerable to the deception of the “Fraudulent Spirit” that Adams refers to. And it is the supernatural deception of Allah the fraudulent spirit, which drives Islam in its relentless goal of world conquest and the subjugation of all its people.

Yes, even Islam is deceived; Islam is being used as a tool of deception to carry out the agenda of Allah, the fraudulent spirit. This, my friend, is why it took 300 years for the Crusaders to comprehend Islam, only then did they set out to do the thing they knew they must do, eliminate the tool in the hand of Allah.

Of course they where not completely successful, they just didn’t have the where with all to completely destroy Islam. If they had, it would be unlikely that Nazism would have been born, or that we would be fighting the same deceived people driven by this same fraudulent spirit today.

The doctrine of this supernatural deception can be found throughout the Quran it is what causes this stuck on stupid blindness of the West to the truth of Islam. In Arabic it is called the “doctrine of the Taqiyyah” and is what is taught to Muslims from childhood.

There is not a single English word that translates “Taqiyyah”. The word deception alone does not cover it, the best description is “True Lies”. When one can convincingly deceive another with the truth, then one is supernaturally deceived.

An example that comes to mind is when a Muslim says that Jihad really means “Personal Struggle” If one is satisfied with that definition then one has been deceived with the truth. Remember Mein Kampf? It was also a personal struggle, Hitler’s personal struggle in the conquest of the world, which is interestingly the same personal struggle and agenda of Islam. It is each Muslims personal struggle to contribute to this agenda. Moreover the greatest contribution a Muslim can make to this world domination is personal martyrdom.

Those who are deceived say…”Oh, well…I thought it meant war, murder, and mayhem etc... Oh, well… if it’s a personal struggle then I guess it’s OK right???.” And they go merrily on their way, totally deceived about the demise of their future. I have heard this scenario so often, its makes me nauseous

THE BOTTOM LINE: The West has been deceived that the core-value of Islam is peace. “Taqiyyah”; the true lies again. Peace for Islam and the world will only come when all the earth bows to Allah. And everyone in it is subjected to Islamic Sharia law. This is why it is called the “Religion of Peace”. “The Ummah”, the establishment of the World Nation of Islam, and the resurrection of the twelfth Caliphate to rule the earth…

Are you ready to accept it? Or are you ready to fight it???

Remember, if you make a covenant with the devil, you will only get burned…

de Andréa