Obama’s Agenda: Restore The Ottoman Empire
Obama is helping advance a grand plan by
Turkey and Egypt, with the support of , to restore the Islamic Ottoman
Empire. This according to Islam will resurrect
the Islamic Caliphate to usher in the Grand Mahdi the Muslim Messiah, the antichrist
of Christian theology. Germany
By de Andréa
May 31, 2013
I may have found someone with a great deal of credibility that supports my four year stand that Obama is a sleeper Muslim Jihadist bent on creating the world wide Nation of Islam by restoring the Ottoman Empire. His name is Dr. Robert E. Kaplan, a modern European historian educated at
The Ottoman Empire was the catalyst by which the last Islamic Caliphate controlled much of southeast Europe, Western Asia, and
North Africa for more than six
centuries. The Ottoman
Empire, dismantled in 1924, followed the Byzantine Empire which followed the
eastern part of the original Roman Empire.
At the end of this article is some of the documented evidence that Obama’s Agenda is to Restore The Islamic Ottoman Empire.
This suggestion that Obama is engaged in the support of the Ottoman resurrection, which the Muslim Brotherhood is a part of, created in 1928 just 4 years after the demise of the Ottoman Empire - is posed by Robert Kaplan in an article titled “The U.S. Helps Reconstruct the Ottoman Empire.” It was published this week by the international policy council and think tank at the Gatestone Institute.
Kaplan, says history suggests a partnership between
and Germany, which has seen
as a means of influencing Muslims worldwide for its own interests. He asks why the U.S. government “would
actively promote German aims,” including the destruction of Yugoslavia
in the 1990s and the re-creation of the Ottoman Empire through the
Brotherhood’s “Arab Spring”, supported by Obama. Turkey
Kaplan points to Obama’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, the ultimate victor in the “Arab Spring”; the
U.S. backing of Jihadist Islamic “rebel”
groups in Libya with ties to
al-Qaida; and current support for similarly constituted Islamic rebel groups in
aligned with al-Qaida. Each of these Syria U.S. military interventions occurred in areas
that were under the original Ottoman Empire.
Kaplan sees a similarity between the Clinton-era attacks against the Serbs and the Obama administration hostility to well-established regimes in
and . He writes:
“Since the mid-1990s the United States has intervened militarily in
several internal armed conflicts in Europe and the Middle East: bombing Serbs
and Serbia in support of Izetbegovic’s Moslem Regime in Bosnia in 1995, bombing
Serbs and Serbia in support of KLA Moslems of Kosovo in 1999, bombing Libya’s
Gaddafi regime in support of the Brotherhood rebels in 2010. Each intervention was justified to Americans
as motivated by humanitarian concerns: to protect Bosnian Moslems from
genocidal Serbs, to protect Kosovo Moslems from genocidal Serbs, and to protect
Libyans from their murderous dictator Muammar Gaddafi.” Kaplan observes that neither
President Clinton nor President Obama ever mentioned the reconstitution of the
Ottoman Empire as a justification for Syria military intervention. U.S.
offered other reasons for intervening in Serbia,
including a desire to gain a strategic foothold in the Balkans, to defeat
communism in Yugoslavia, to
demonstrate to the world’s Muslims that the is not anti-Muslim, and to
redefine the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era. U.S.
At its height in the 15th and 16th centuries, the Ottoman Empire stretched from its capital in
Turkey, through the Muslim-populated areas of North Africa, Iraq,
the costal regions of the Arabian Peninsula
and parts of the Balkans.
Kaplan points out that since the 1990s, “each European and Middle Eastern country that experienced American military intervention in an internal military conflict or an ‘Arab Spring’ has ended up with a government dominated by Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood or al-Qaida variety fits nicely with the idea that these events represent a return to Ottoman rule.”
In these conflicts, Kaplan sees recurring patterns employed by Clinton and Obama to justify U.S. military intervention: Each U. S. military action in Europe and the Middle East since 1990, with the exception of Iraq, has followed an overt pattern: First there is an armed conflict within the country where the intervention will take place. American news media heavily report this conflict. The “good guys” in the story are the rebels part of the Muslim Brotherhood. The “bad guys,” to be attacked by American military force, are brutally anti-democratic, and committers of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Prestigious public figures, NGOs, judicial and quasi-judicial bodies and international organizations call for supporting the Brotherhood rebels and attacking the regime. Next, the American president orders American logistical support and arms supplies for the rebels. Finally the American president orders military attack under the auspices of NATO in support of the Brotherhood rebels The ultimate outcome of each American intervention is the replacement of a secular government with an Islamist regime in an area that had been part of the Ottoman Empire.
Kaplan cites a recent report published by John Rosenthal in the online Asian Times that discloses reports prepared by the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, attributing the massacre in the Syrian town of
on May 25, 2012, to
the Syrian government. Rosenthal linked
the conclusions of the BND regarding the Houla massacre to the policy of the
German government to support the Syrian rebellion and its political arm, the
Syrian National Council. Houla
Recalling that Germany invaded Serbia in both World Wars I and II and actively sought the destruction of Yugoslavia in the Cold War era, Kaplan wonders if the administration’s joining with Germany in the bombing of Libya, and possibly Syria as well, is an effort to help Germany fill its foreign policy objective of restoring the Ottoman Empire. Kaplan notes that the Obama Regime’s foreign policy orders the downplay of the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida terrorist threat to
national security. U.S.
Follow the evidence…
Is al-Qaida really defeated, or is it actually embraced by Obama?
In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama spoke at a campaign event in Las Vegas one day after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, proclaiming, “A day after 9/11, we are reminded that a new tower rises above the New York skyline, but al-Qaeida is on the path to defeat and bin Laden is dead.”
On Nov. 1, 2012, CNSNews.com reported that Obama had described al-Qaida as having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” or some other variation at least 32 times since the attack on the
consulate in . It was Obama’s repeated theme last week in
his counter-terrorism policy speech at the Benghazi National Defense University
at Fort McNair
in Washington, D.C.
Obama also has advanced a narrative expressing
acceptance of Islam. U.S.
In his foreign policy speech delivered at Cairo University June 4, 2009, Obama explained he had known Islam “on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.”
In a joint press availability with Turkey’s President Gul at Cankaya Palace in Ankara, Turkey, on April 6, 2009, Obama repudiated U.S. history since George Washington, declaring the U.S. “is no longer a Christian Nation, it is a Muslim Nation”. Yet, despite Obama’s attempt to establish a narrative in which Islamic terrorism is not a threat to
security, evidence abounds that the Islamic Brotherhood rebels responsible for
opposing Gadhafi in Libya
and Assad in
have extensive ties to al-Qaida and to Obama. Syria
In September 2012, WorldNetDaily broke the story that the slain
U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a
central role in recruiting Jihadists to fight the regime, according to Egyptian
security forces. Syria
In December 2012, WorldNetDaily reported top level al-Qaida operatives are functioning with impunity in
under a NATO-established provisional government. Libya
In February 2013, WorldNetDaily reported that the
U.S. special mission in Benghazi
was used to coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to rebels in
who are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups. Libya
On May 14, 2013, WorldNetDaily reported the attack that killed Stevens and three other Americans was an al-Qaida revenge killing that took place one day after al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri called for retaliation for a
drone strike that killed a top Libyan al-Qaida leader. U.S.
On Jan. 3, 2013, WorldNetDaily reported that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the Obama White House, with several American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration identified as Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on
On Feb. 10, 2013, WorldNetDaily reported President Obama’s nominee to head the CIA, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in
. Saudi Arabia
The Gatestone Institute website describes the organization as a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council, and think tank dedicated “to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report.” As the organization’s website explains, “Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts – analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: For the past four years since Obama became a presidential candidate, and despite all the ridicule, I have stood my ground and maintained that Obama is a sleeper Jihadist Muslim. Throughout his first term I connected the dots and concluded that Obama’s agenda was to destroy
economy with social communism and in its place create an Islamic State. I still stand by that statement. This is all happening before our very eyes
but our eyes have been blinded, our ears are deaf and our brains are dead. This is the road were on my friend. It’s just a matter of time…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.