Wednesday, January 17, 2018

The Many States of California

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

The Many States of California

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 17, 2018



Islamic terrorism is obviously a clear and present danger to safety and freedom in America, but there is an even more serious threat facing the Republic.

Those involved in the destruction of a free republic have been infiltrating strategic posts in American bureaucracies in both federal and state governments for more than a hundred years. Today many federal and state governments behave more like oligarchies - than representatives of the people. In Washington DC we have only one branch of government left. That is - the judicial branch, who now makes’ AND enforces their own far left ideology with impunity. Totally and blatantly ignoring the law that they took an oath to uphold…the U.S. Constitution.  Now the Courts no longer just fulfill, and carry out the law, they illegally make and enforce their own law.

As much of America undergoes a conservative awakening of sorts, the left is radicalizing at a rapid and dangerous pace. They have formed a shadow behind the scenes government now known as the DeepState.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, which was, in many ways a catalyst for the political polarization we see on the left, the entire state of California, one of the most un-American states in the union began to yammer on about possibly seceding from the Union. You and I know the result of the last true threat of state secession, it started the Civil war. This temper tantrum became the prototype for the “resistance” movement, who patently  oppose President Donald Trump on every possible subject, in every possible way, for no reason other than he’s not criminal Hillary Clinton who is one of the leaders of the DeepState.
Now, a different kind of California secession movement has spawned itself, this time with the rural parts of current California hoping to separate themselves from the urban population centers that dominate the state’s cultural and political trade.
With the reading of their own version of a Declaration of Independence, founders of the state of New California took the first steps to what they hope will eventually lead to statehood. CBS Sacramento reports they don’t want to leave the United States, they just want to leave California.
“Well, it’s been ungovernable for a long time. The highest taxes in the country, indoctrination type education, you name it, and we’re rated around 48th to 50th from a business climate and standpoint in California,” said founder Robert Paul Preston.
The state of New California shown in blue at right, would be a two state solution incorporating most of the state’s rural counties, leaving the urban coastal counties to the current Social Democratic state of California.
But unlike other separation movements in the past, the state of New California wants to do things according to the Constitution, citing Article 4, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution and working with the state legislature to get it done, similar to the way West Virginia and other states were formed. The Law says: “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress...” So the U.S. Constitution allows for this with consent of the Federal and state legislatures.

A similar measure has been repeatedly considered in the state of New York, where New York
City’s enormous and overwhelmingly Social Democrat liberal population completely controls the state’s political scene, even though the remaining counties in the state are extremely conservative.
Then there is the California proposal of a 6 state solution shown at right. This has similarities to the New California proposal, in that it isolates the coastal regions.
Should the day ever come where we have to choose which California to visit, I know right where I’ll go. And that is to the northern state of Jefferson.  Which brings yet another proposal, it’s not a new proposal. It’s actually been going on since early 1900, and that is another two state solution. The state of Jefferson in the North and the state of California in the South.     You can get a glimpse of that shown at right.  As you can see it also includes the southern part of Oregon.
 As much as one might like to break California up into six states, it seems highly unlikely to me. Too many people, and too many counties involved. But having northern or the central and southern coast of California secede from the rest of the state seems to me to be a more plausible solution. Moreover, it will still leave the rest of the state to continue to secede from Southern California or the coastal counties.

The populous of the  Central and Southern coast of California have an attitude that – ‘I’ve got mine…to Hell with the rest of you!’ This is a typical elitist’s attitude leading to despotism my friend. Do you realize that there are 9 State legislators representing Northern California and 111 representing central and Southern California? Just a tad out of balance wouldn’t you say!  Is this the balance of power that the Framers envisioned?  I don’t think so. This is how the Hollywood elitists control the state with their fantasy utopian political ideology.

If the Federal government becomes an oligarchy’, and it will, if we continue down this dark road to the DeepState, I might be in favor of states seceding from the United States, but until that time, if a free people are to remain free they must take control of their own states.  Once the states are repatriated then we might have the where with all to return this nation back into the American Constitutional Republic.

Did you know, that under the law we are guaranteed a Republican form of Government not a Democracy? Article 4 section 4 of the U.S. Constitution: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence”. and shall protect each of them against Invasion.  You will notice that it doesn’t say ‘on Application of the judicial branch of Government. ‘The courts have done nothing but usurp the authority of the legislature and the Executive branch creating Judicial Tyranny.  

A Republican form of government is: having a chief of state who is not a dictator and is usually a president; also: a nation or other political unit having such a government: a government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to law; also: a nation or other political unit having such a form of government Source: NMW

What we have evolved into in America, is Social democracy. It originated as a political ideology that advocated an evolutionary, surreptitious and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism using established political processes in contrast to the revolutionary approach to transition associated with orthodox Marxism.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One thing you can do right now is to write your federal representatives here, (they can’t represent you unless they hear from you) and kindly tell them to grow a spine and take back control of law making.  Legislators, and legislatures alone, have the constitutional power to make law, not the Courts. We have been witnessing judicial tyranny my friend. It’s time to put a stop to this before it’s too late and we have to resort to the last’ resort - violence.

That’ by the way, is the reason for the Second Amendment my friend, “…being necessary to the security of a free state.”

So whether you want a two state, a six state or a no state solution to the tyranny of the social oligarchy I do hope that you consider just what it means to be a free American.

It surely isn’t more anti-Constitutional laws…I know that much!    

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Trump Says He Didn’t Say Any Racist Remarks.

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Trump Says He Didn’t Say Any Racist Remarks.  

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 13, 2018


First, I automatically don’t believe anything…that’s ANYTHING my friend…that comes from the Communist News Media. Every time there is something outrageous that Trump is supposes to have done or said I wait until all the demons have come out of the woodwork and then I look for the truth.

Second, if Trump said what the DarkSide said he said, I don’t see that as racists as they claim. It would have been the truth. Have you ever been to Hattie or some of the African countries? They are s’rat holes!  And then I found it interesting that this accusation mostly came from people that weren’t even present at the meeting and those that were, are from the DarkSide, the DeepState of the Shadow Government.

Senator Perdue, who was there', said on Newsmax TV:
Sen. David Perdue told Newsmax TV Friday that "I honestly don't remember" the reported words "s***hole countries" used by President Donald Trump to describe certain countries in a meeting Thursday on immigration reform. And I’m’ not the only one that was there that doesn’t remember those words being said. I honestly don't remember that word being used," the first-term Georgia Republican told Newsmax TV's John Bachman in an exclusive interview, "but I do remember the conversation about what's wrong with the current immigration system.
Third, if in fact he did say something like ‘these countries are S*** holes’, if in fact they are’, then wouldn’t that be the truth rather than “racist” as was reported? The Hate America DarkSide always has to play the Race Card because they are the racists.

Fourth, it was reported that Trump used that vulgar description over and over again throughout his conversation. If that were true don’t you think everyone present would have heard it at least once? Were half or more of those present sleeping or passed out?

THE BOTTOM LINE: Anytime the ‘truth be told’ it is as if the demonic DarkSide of the DeepState shudders at the thought, and they need to quickly cover it up with a lie.  Moreover if he did say what was reported, it was certainly a slam against the countries mentioned but it certainly wasn’t racist.

Many previous presidents were at least as vulgar as Trump, President Truman comes to mind.

I didn’t vote for Trump because he was a well-groomed Statesmen and a graduate of a finishing school, I voted for Trump because he’s smart, successful and more importantly he loves America.   

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

The Federal Justice System’s Blatant Disregard For The U.S. Constitution


The Federal Justice System’s Blatant Disregard For The U.S. Constitution

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 11, 2018   


The law is supposed to be a shield to protect freedom, but the government now uses is as a sword to destroy it. de Andrea
All three branches of the Federal Government have been violating the American Constitution for so long, that if one identifies any improprieties or even blatant Constitutional violations, one is met with – “Well that’s the way it has been for a hundred years.” As if laws are made legal by prolonged existence, whether constitutional or not.
The following ongoing travesty of justice is just one of many thousands of cases that would make Chief Justus John Jay roll over in his grave. Not only does it not have any legal bases because the Bureau of Land Management, the other (BLM), is just one of thousands of illegal unconstitutional departments within the U.S. Federal government.  Long story short, which I have written many articles on, is the fact that the Federal Government cannot own land with the exception of the National Parks Act, and military bases and land occupied by Federal buildings such as the Whitehouse and the Capital building etc.
John Jay by the way was the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Whose opinion of Constitutional law says it all.  “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.” - John Jay
And yet the Federal Government has claimed over the years to own more and more of the western United States. And in some states more land than the state and citizens do, as indicated in red on the map. Check out Nevada and Utah.  And anyone the BLM Gestapo says is trespassing on ‘their stolen land’ is subject to arrest by the FBI.  Or to be shot by them.  
This all began in a confrontation and standoff in 2014 near the Bundy Ranch in southern Nevada and then it spread to the State of Oregon and Idaho, people were killed and arrested. 
Last Friday, following a meeting of Tier 1 and Tier 3 Bundy Ranch defendants in court with Judge Gloria Navarro, another trial date was set for October 10. That trial included Eric Parker and Stephen Drexler, who have already been tried twice with hung juries and in other cases non-guilty verdicts. Now, at least a third of Idaho representatives are calling on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to put an end to the illegal badgering of these men with trial after trial, a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment's protections against Double Jeopardy in trials they have already been acquitted, (and yes, I know the "legaleeze" about mistrials and hung juries, but the fact is that under that kind of gestapo thinking, one could try someone indefinitely) until they are sent to the gulags for violating an unconstitutional law.   
Since then, one-third of the representatives of Idaho, the state in which Parker and Drexler live, penned a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions asking for him relax the pursuit by Nevada prosecutors against four Idahoans who are charged or have been convicted in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada.
The letter was authored by State Rep. Dorothy Moon (R-Stanley) and signed by 24 Idaho representatives from the House and Senate last Tuesday stating:  "We believe that the decision by the current U.S. attorney to Nevada to prosecute these men a third time represents disrespect for the rule of law and the jury system."
The four men these representatives are standing up for are Ammon Bundy, of Emmett; Eric Parker, of Hailey; Scott Drexler, of Challis; and Todd Engel, of Boundary County.
"We are tasked with the responsibility to protect our citizens' constitutional rights," the letter stated, noting the Idaho Legislatures has a "high respect for the rule of law."
"We believe that the right to a speedy trial and the presumption of innocence are essential pillars to law, order, and a Republican form of government," the letter continues. "We also believe that a trial by a jury of one's peers is the highest form of justice as set forth by our founders. Ensuring government stays within the bounds of its proper constitutional role empowers the people through a jury's verdict to give clear guidance as to their will."
They then spoke out about the innocence of the defendants who have already been tried and found not guilty.
"We the undersigned believe that in the case of 'The Bunkerville Stand Off' trials in the State of Nevada in which Eric Parker and O. Scott Drexler of the State of Idaho were charged with 40 criminal counts in connection with the above case having been found not guilty speaks volumes to the public of their innocence," the letter states. "U. S. Attorneys have been unsuccessful obtaining guilty verdicts not once, but twice, establishing criteria for dismissal of charges against them according to our standards of justice. Further exploitation of these citizens would be an affront to justice and notice to the public of prosecutorial harassment."
Well, if you ask me that began when they tried the men a second time after failing to prove their case. After all, the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove guilt, not on those charged to prove their innocence. But then, we are dealing with a government judicial system that has gone off the rails.  We have fought wars over less. 
"We believe that the decision by the current U. S. Attorney of Nevada to prosecute these men a third time represents disrespect for the rule of law and the Jury system," the representatives wrote.  "A third trial would show blatant disregard for tax funds collected from hard working law abiding citizens who are represented by these juries who have found them innocent of 34 of the 40 charges and hung by the very slimmest margins in those where the jury stood deadlocked.  The decisions of 10-2 to acquit in the first trial and 11-1 to acquit in the second trial highlights the narrow margin by which the prosecution hopes to continue their attack."
Then they called on Sessions, the court and the prosecutor to consider Todd Engel's time served as punishment for the minor charges for which he was found guilty. He was scheduled to be sentenced on September 28.’
The letter continues:
"Ammon Bundy, an Idaho resident, remains in custody awaiting trial directly after the final outcome of the pending prosecution's decision with Parker and Drexler.  Ammon has been in custody since January of 2016 without benefit of bail or the comfort of home and familiy in spite of being found not guilty of all counts in the Oregon trial. Ammon has been stripped of normal due process for a prosecution that now seems flimsy as we discover evidence exposed during these previous hung trials of others for similar offenses. This prosecution sends a chilling message to the public who are concerned about federal overreach in their daily lives that is inharmonious to well-established constitutional guarantees. The percentages of jurors causing the hung verdicts in these trials should send a clear signal to the government prosecutors of the jury's reticence to further prosecute these defendants as has clearly been received by the public."
The representatives then call on Sessions to have those in charge of this case end this long enduring action and set Eric Parker and Scott Drexler free, set reasonable bail for Ammon Bundy and allow Todd Engel to use his time served as total sentencing.
Among those signing the letter included House Majority Leader Mike Moyle; Assistant Majority Leader Brent Crane; Treasure Valley Sens. Clifford Bayer and Lori Den Hartog; and Treasure Valley Reps. Judy Boyle, Christy Perry, Brandon Hixon, Greg Chaney, Joe Palmer, James Holtzclaw, Steve Harris and Jason Monks.
“I think it is a complete injustice and a waste of taxpayer money and time to continue to go after these guys after two mistrials,” said Rep. Boyle, from Midvale.  “Let it go. We are not talking about murders, robberies, druggies, rapists. It is continuing to waste the court’s time and federal taxpayers’ money. I know the federal government wants to make a point, but get over it.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: This does not have to go to a third trial in order for it to be considered exploitation and prosecutorial harassment. That has and is still taking place by the prosecution and by Judge Gloria Navarro.
I have said since the end of the first trial, if the prosecution had any sense about them, they would drop the charges against the remaining defendants and spare them and taxpayers any further grief and burden by simply admitting the Federal Government is wrong.
I'm hoping once things settle that we will see each one of these men come together and sue the pants off the prosecution and the judge in the case, as well as Bureau of Land Management goon Daniel P. Love for their reckless and lawless behavior in this entire process. And then take the BLM to the Supreme Court and have the Department declared un-constitutional and abolished.  And then return federally confiscated state land to the states and to the people to whom it belongs. 
Seeing that a new trial date has been set, it appears AG Sessions doesn't care that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are being violated concerning Drexler and Parker and that other rights are being violated concerning the remaining defendants in the case.  I'm not surprised. After all, Sessions has demonstrated in the past that he doesn't care about the Fifth Amendments protections of life, liberty and property when it comes to asset forfeiture.
You can write your Federal representative HERE, or you can wait until they come after you over some other illegal unconstitutional law, and you end up in the gulags yourself.
At the beginning I said: “The law is supposed to be a shield to protect freedom, but the government now uses is as a sword to destroy it.” I challenge you to think long and hard about that my friend.
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

CA’ LT. GOV SAYS HE’S COMING FOR YOUR GUNS

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


CA LT. GOV SAYS: HE’S COMING FOR YOUR GUNS...

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 10, 2018   



California’s Lt. Governor Gavin Newsome is as Anti American as they come. He was a popular mayor in San Francisco, California’s most Anti-Constitutional city, and he’s a rising star in California’s Communist Party. All of that being said, it’s obvious that he tows the line on most of the most sacred beliefs of the Democommunist Party. In particular he says that when he is elected Governor he will take away the rights of Californians to keep and bear arms. In other words he is planning to abolish the California and the U.S.  Constitution.  No surprise there!

As evidence of that fact, he recently tweeted out this gem of idiocy.

It's been 5 years since 20 first graders were shot dead at Sandy Hook.

Since then:
14 killed in San Bernardino
49 killed in Orlando
58 killed in Vegas
26 killed in a Texas church
Enough.

We have a message for the 
@NRA: If you hurt people, we ARE coming for your guns.


Here’s the problem with that Comrade Newsome…
NONE of these attacks were committed by members of the NRA. Only one of these attacks were even committed by a “legal” gun owner, and that man was certifiable and should not have had access to firearms. Proving that your anti-gun background checks are useless.
In addition, all of those mass shooting took place in a GUN FREE ZONE! Comrade Newsome, proving once again that GUN FREE ZONES are the most dangerous places for your kids and other living things to be.  

Also, the next time a Democrat politician advocates gun control but says their “not coming for our guns,” point them to this tweet and call them out for the Hate America liars that they are.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  If Californians elect Comrade Newsome for the head of the Ca - KGB next election you can say хороший рейс to all of your American Constitutional rights, and California will become the first completely Communist State of America. If that’s what you want then be sure to vote for Gavin Newsom for Dictator of California.  

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source 

Tuesday, January 09, 2018

It’s Open Season On Your Kids In Ca Schools

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." Thomas Jefferson


It’s Open Season On Your Kids In Ca Schools

 



By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 9, 2018   



Before I begin I will preface this article with the statement: All mass murders take place in GUN FREE ZONE’s!

If you love your kids…Buy a gun and ‘Home School Them’. Don’t be ignorant my friend, your kids will pay the price.

 

Fabian Gov. Jerry Brown signs more gun control bills leading to the incremental agenda of complete disarmament for the totalitarian State of California.


California Dictator. Jerry Brown signed measures to end the last narrow allowances in the state for campus carry, open carry of any kind and making it illegal for a gun to be on any school campus, paving the way for another Sandy Hook massacre, this time in any school in the state.
Brown, a far left wing extremist hate America Communist, signed AB 7, AB 424 and AB 1525 while rejecting SB 464, aimed at ramping up security measures at gun shops across the state, as an overreach. What a twisted Commie mind he has. He not only doesn’t want to protect your kids at school, he doesn’t want those who provide protection to have any security either.  
Last gasp for campus carry
Assembly Bill 424, sponsored by Assembly member Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, with the support of the California Federation of Teachers, state PTA, and the National Association of Social Workers as well as a host of anti-Constitutional gun control advocates, ended the ability for a school district superintendent to give permission to someone to have a firearm on campus to protect your kids.  We should attribute the next mass shooting in a GUN FREE ZONE in California to Comrade-Dictator Jerry Moon Beam Brown my friend.
The move was a follow-up to a general ban on campus carry passed by lawmakers in 2015 in the wake of news that at least four school districts in the state were granting limited exemptions.
McCarty said Brown’s signature affirmed California’s commitment to GUN FREE schools while thanking Moms Demand Action for their “leadership” on the issue. But gun rights advocates said Brown’s signing of AB 424 will not only not improve public safety, but what it will do is guarantee another school massacre.
“The Legislature and Governor Brown have made sure that no good people with guns will be close enough to stop an evil or insane person in the event of a serious attack,” said Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition, in a statement.
Rural open carry ban a precursor to a total carry ban
Assembly member Mike Gipson, D-Carson, backed AB 7 to expand the state’s open carry prohibition to cover shotguns and rifles carried in unincorporated areas in other words all guns. The law will make it is a misdemeanor to openly carry a long gun in a public place where the discharge of a firearm is prohibited in an unincorporated area of a county. Public lands open for hunting and target shooting are still not affected, in the incremental total ban on guns I can only guarantee it is on the slate for next time.
“In effect, this bill closes a narrow loophole in California’s existing open carry prohibitions,” Brown said in his signing message.
The move caps a half-century of incremental regulation on the open carry of loaded firearms in the state that began with the Mulford Act following armed meetings of the Black Panther Party in the 1960s, and in recent years restricted the carry of handguns in general and long arms in incorporated areas. Brown approved restrictions on the open carry of unloaded handguns in 2011.
The third measure signed by the governor, AB 1525, authorizes new warning labels printed to direct those buying a gun to the website of the California Attorney General for information on complying with state firearms laws. Backed by the hate America group Brady Bunch Campaign, the move is the latest installment of the state’s mandatory gun warning labels which have been standard since 1993.

A raft of new laws which Dictator Jerry Brown signed off on in California, included  automatically registering everyone who walks into a DMV office as a voter Constitutionally legal or not . But that wasn’t all that Jerry had up his sleeve. There was another bill awaiting his signature which would ban concealed carry permit holders from bringing their weapons onto the grounds of public schools and colleges. For a guy like Governor Brown, that one was clearly a no brainer. (Fox News)

Jerry Moon Beam Brown has signed a bill banning concealed weapons from California schools and universities, a measure that drew renewed attention after a recent massacre at a GUN FREE ZONE in an Oregon community college.

SB707 by Democratic Sen. Lois Wolk of Davis will prohibit people with concealed weapons permits from carrying firearms on school and college campuses.

People who have concealed carry permits would be, because of a law suit, allowed to carry firearms within 1,000 feet of a public or private K-12 school, but not on the grounds.


If the man wasn’t already 77 years old I’d think he was running for President. So in the wake of yet another GUN FREE ZONE being shot to pieces a bit up the coast from his state, Brown has decided to respond by ensuring that every school in the state maintains its GUN FREE ZONE status. That’s just brilliant, isn’t it? He wants to make sure there is another Sandy Hook massacre, but this time in California.

Brown is reacting in a typical, Fabian progressive fashion to the last school shootings and just trying to make it look like he’s doing something – anything – rather than being carried along on the tides of history. Unfortunately the message he’s sending is that potential shooters should keep their Google Maps app up on their phones and find all the local K-12 classes. It’s open season in California schools.

Contrast this to Texas, where opponents are struggling to figure out how to implement the Campus Carry law which goes into effect next year. (CNN)  The bill many know as the “campus carry” law is scheduled to go into effect August 1, the 50-year anniversary of the University of Texas Tower sniper shooting, one of the first mass murders on a college campus in America.

THE BOTTOM LINE: We should revisit this in about five years and see how many school shootings take place in protected Texas schools vs California’s unprotected GUN FREE ZONES. No matter which way it breaks, the results ‘should’ prove instructive, but they won’t.

On A personal note: If I had my way anyone involved in the GUN FREE ZONE laws that lead to the next mass shooting, should be brought up on charges of coo conspiracy to commit mass murder and put in front of a firing squad.

In addition, parents should demand security in the schools or pull their kids out.

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.