America is Abandoning Israel

So Israel is defying America

By de Andréa

One might say…Well I am not abandoning Israel. But unfortunately you do not represent America. The president does, and he has traded our long time ally, friend, and part of the historical religious foundation of America for the illegitimate terrorist organization who call themselves the Palestinians.

Although the so-called Palestinians have no historical ties to any land anywhere on planet earth, the rest of the ignorant world has been deceived by Islam into believing that these Muslim murdering terrorist refugees from Jordan somehow have a historical right to Israel’s historical land.

One should not expect anything different from al- Barrack Hussein Obammah, after all he has been robotically brain washed by these same Muslim terrorists since he was born in only God knows what country.

In the picture, Obama strikes a deal in support of Palestinian terrorist President Mahmoud Abbas in the Oval Office May 28, 2009.

“The Obama administration recently demanded Israel halt all settlement activity, including natural growth, in apparent abrogation of a deal made by President Bush to allow for natural growth”. So says David Ha'Ivri, a spokesman for the West Bank's regional Jewish council

Israeli activists have launched a campaign using Barack Obama's name to construct Jewish housing projects on West Bank hilltops in defiance of the U.S. president's demands for a halt to all Jewish building in the strategic territory.

"Mr. President, your policy that aims to destroy the historic Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem will no longer go unchallenged," states a press release from the Obama Hilltop Project. "We aim to rally the worldwide pro-Israel community to support the rebirth of these communities and counter your unjust, illegal policies."

The goal is to increase the Jewish presence in the West Bank, beginning with the re-establishment of the town of Homesh, which was one of four Jewish communities evacuated by Israel during the country's 2005 retreat from the Gaza Strip.

Who and what gives the president of the United States the authority to demand a halt to building anything in any sovereign nation anywhere in this world??? Islam…Yes, Islam is the authority for al-Barrack Hussein Obammah. (Don’t forget he made a deal to support the ‘Palestinian Terrorists’)

Critics pointed out the West Bank evacuations served no practical purpose other than to send a signal to West Bank Jews they might be next on the chopping block. Homesh was not taken over by the Palestinian terrorists, and the Israeli army continued to operate there. Indeed, the Israeli court system recently has ruled Jews can still be present in Homesh, leading to the establishment there of a Torah center.

Activists are now looking for donations of any amount to help them expand Homesh, including a new hilltop community to be named after Obama.

Those making online donations are being encouraged to also send a formal letter to Obama making the White House aware of the effort to support Jewish growth in the West Bank
.
The letter states: "Mr. President, your current foreign policy contradicts the most sacred values of the Jewish Nation. It is written in our holy Torah, 'The Lord your God will bring you into the land that your ancestors possessed, and you will possess it; he will make you more prosperous and numerous than your ancestors.” (Deuteronomy, 26:3-5). Good people throughout the world will continue to support Jewish building and growth in all parts of our sacred land of Israel."

The effort is being supported by multiple organizations, including Shalom International, the Jewish community of Hebron and the Homesh First Movement.

"We are aware of the fact that Obama is very interested in the issue of our presence in Judea and Samaria. So we will call a hilltop there in the name of Obama in his honor,"

David Ha'Ivri, a spokesman for the West Bank's regional Jewish council said : “The Obama administration recently demanded Israel halt all settlement activity, including natural growth, in apparent abrogation of a deal made by President Bush to allow for natural growth”.

The deal was forged just prior to Israel's 2005 retreat from the Gaza Strip. It was confirmed by Sharon aide Dov Weissglas in 2005 and in a Wall Street Journal column last week by Elliott Abrams, a former deputy national security adviser to Bush who reportedly negotiated the arrangement. The deal was in line with an official letter from Bush the year before stating Israel cannot be expected to withdraw from the entire West Bank and that the Jewish state would retain major settlement blocs there.

The West Bank borders major Israeli cities and is within rocket-firing range of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.

Military strategists long have estimated Israel must maintain the West Bank to defend itself from any ground invasion. Terrorist groups have warned if Israel withdraws, they will launch rockets from the West Bank into Israeli cities.

Many villages in the West Bank, which Israelis commonly refer to as the "biblical heartland," are mentioned throughout the Torah.

The book of Genesis says Abraham entered Israel at Shechem (Nablus) and received God's promise of land for his offspring. He later was buried in Hebron.

The nearby town of Beit El, anciently called Bethel, meaning "house of God," is where Scripture says the patriarch Jacob slept on a stone pillow and dreamed of angels ascending and descending a stairway to heaven. In that dream, God spoke directly to Jacob and reaffirmed the promise of territory.

And in Exodus, the holy tabernacle rested in Shiloh, believed to be the first area the ancient Israelites settled after fleeing captivity in Egypt

Palestine or Canaan and the city state known as Hazor is historical. But nowhere in history is there any such race of people known as Palestinians or any such country known as Palestine. Interestingly enough though there is an historical race known as Jews (Israeli’s) and an historical country known as Israel.

There were a people who occupied the area south of Gezer on the West Bank known as the Philistines (sea people) but they were from Caphtor or Crete, they certainly were not Arabs. As I recall they also were a pain in backside to the Israeli’s.

But north of Gezer on the West Bank, to Carmel was Israel. Israel occupied land all the way up to Hazor north of the Sea of Chinnereth or Galilee, Syria on one side and Phoenicia (now Lebanon) on the other.

I believe we could straighten this whole Middle Eastern mess out, if we could just get those involved to read their history book, or better yet the Bible.

Why??? Because that my friend, is where the answers are…

de Andréa

Cong. McKinney Returns from Israeli Prison.

This of course is where all the liberal treasonous Democrats belong, in prison.

By de Andréa

Will the FBI arrest Terrorest Supporter Cynthia McKinney?

Cynthia McKinney admits to giving food and medical supplies to the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah. Moreover, ‘she is proud of it.'

We have a new Jane Fonda, only this time she is an ex-congresswoman.

Now that Cynthia is back in the United States has the Obama administration taken her passport away? NO.

Has the FBI arrested her for committing Treason? NO

Has the FBI arrested her for assisting terrorism? NO

Is the Department of Justice going to indict her for her crimes? NO

Why hasn't Couric, Williams, Wolf, the Times (any variety), Post or the Huffington Post demanded answers as to why McKinney is still walking among us?

McKinney is a criminal, helping terrorists and she is being protected by the liberal Communist Left and Barack Obama.

It is time to put all supporters of terrorists in prison--Gitmo is the right place for McKinney. Why is the President of the United States protecting an agent of terrorism?

He needs to be asked at the next press conference. We need answers.

Former Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) arrived in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday the 7th of July, 2009 after being detained in an Israeli prison for more than a week with others protesting the Israeli occupation of Gaza and aiding and abetting the enemy.

McKinney, who arrived at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport around noon, will meet with reporters to discuss how the Israeli navy detained her and 20 other human rights advocates aboard a boat attempting to deliver supplies to the Palestinian terrorists in Gaza.

Their action violates the Israel-Gaza embargo, and the US article of war. But human rights advocates say the Israeli navy broke the law since the activists’ boat was in international waters when they were seized. During her detention, McKinney refused to sign a statement saying she violated Israeli law, which extended her time in jail.

“State Department and White House officials have not effected our release or taken a strong public stance to condemn the illegal actions of the Israeli Navy of enforcing a blockade of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians of Gaza, a blockade that has been condemned by President Obama,” McKinney said last week in a statement.

In the coming days, McKinney will take part in a daily vigil for others in her group — “Free Gaza 21” — still being detained by Israeli authorities, and for “Palestinians suffering the effects of the Israeli occupation and the invasion of Gaza” according to a press release issued by the Green Party. The vigil will take place every evening at the Van Ness-UDC Metro Station, which is near the Israeli embassy.

McKinney served in the House from 1993 to 2003 and from 2005 to 2007. She was also the 2008 Green Party presidential nominee.

THE BOTTOM LINE: To answer the questions at the beginning of this article of why McKinney will not be indicted for treason or aiding the enemy of the United States, Israel and the world in time of war, is an easy answer. The entire liberal, enemy loving, treasonous multicultural, America hating, Communist Congress and Administration of the United States would be and should be indicted for Treason for aiding and abetting the enemy.

And you know that won’t happen…

…”That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence.

Maybe we need to reinstitute the ‘Declaration’.

And reinstate the precepts of ‘Revolution’.

de Andréa

CAIR Re-indicted Under RICO

“CAIR and the ISNA had essentially tried to get me killed”

By de Andrae

I can relate to this story told by Daved Gaubatz, because members of CAIR ‘The Council on American-Islamic Relations" as well as respondents from ISNA ‘The Islamic Society of North America", have made repeated threats against my own life, such as “If we find out who and where you are, we will hang you upside down, slit your throat and bleed you like the pig that you are” or the most resent “We know who your are, and we are coming to get you”.

Daved Gaubatz attended a convention with a high-profile Christian keynote speaker, Rick Warren, the Islamic Society of North America billed its July 4 national convention in Washington D.C. as a so-called major outreach to non-Muslims, but it chose to eject by force an American investigating Islamist terrorism in the U.S.

Dave Gaubatz, a former Air Force special agent who has traveled the country investigating terrorist Islamist mosques and attempts at imposing Shariah law in the U.S., he was forcibly removed from the conference after paying the $100 attendance fee.

"It was apparent that I was 'flagged,' Eight or nine ISNA, CAIR and other men surrounded me. They refused to tell me who they were or why they wanted me to leave. One then said CAIR wants you out. They began crowding me. I was a professional and told them to step away from me, tell me who they are, and why was I being illegally detained. I told them this could have been avoided if ISNA would have emailed me a cancellation. I told them I want my $100 back. Meanwhile I was asking them some tough questions they could not answer."

Get the hot new video "The Third Jihad" to understand the threat Islamists pose to all Americans. See the trailer!


If that wasn’t enough, after ISNA officials let Gaubatz out of the Washington Convention Center, he was then quickly surrounded by Washington police.

"I was on the street and noticed at least three D.C. patrol cars," he said. "I took pictures. Then I started walking toward my parked car. One patrol car was following me slowly. I stopped, took a few pictures of him, and then walked to my car. I got in my car. Three patrol cars surrounded me and my vehicle. I was told to get out. I asked what the problem was. Finally one officer showed me pictures that CAIR had given them and told them I was a terrorist threat.

There were four pictures – three were of me in Iraq with my M-16 and 9mm, and in two, I was holding an AK-47 in Iraq. CAIR had a photographed of me helping a sick Iraqi child in the picture. Then CAIR had cropped out the child [photoshopped] my head shot onto a Nazi uniform, which was obvious."

The police said members of CAIR had given them the pictures, saying he was a threat.

"I told them about the pictures, my background in Iraq, and who I was," Gaubatz said. "They knew nothing of this. CAIR and ISNA had essentially tried to get me killed. The officer reminded me they just had the Holocaust Museum shooting. CAIR intentionally misled the officers to make them believe I was just someone who carries guns. CAIR failed to tell them these were pictures from Iraq when I was serving my country."

CAIR, a long time friend of the deceived FBI is now being indicted for the third time, this time under the RICO statute.

Four plaintiffs contacted their attorney David Yerushalmi only after they had spoken to Gaubatz, who is a private researcher that had been investigating CAIR for its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and its ties to global jihad.

The complaint identifies CAIR as a racketeering enterprise under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which is a criminal racketeering statute that allows victims to sue the defendants in civil court. In addition to damages, the plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief under this and other statutes to shut down CAIR and to prevent the individual defendants from engaging in public interest legal work in the future.

The named defendants are: the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network Inc. (dba CAIR); Nihad Awad aka Nihad Hammad, who serves as executive director of CAIR National; Parvez Ahmed, who was the chairman of the board of CAIR National during the relevant time period; Tahra Goraya, who was the national director of CAIR but who has since resigned; Khadijah Athman, who is the manager of the "civil rights" division of CAIR; and Nadhira al-Khalili, Esq., who is in-house legal counsel for CAIR. All were handed subpoenas that evening.

According to the complaint, CAIR's in-house Washington, D.C.-based attorney Khalili was directly involved in taking the legal files out of the CAIR Virginia office and concealing them in the D.C. office.

Also named as defendants are Ibrahim Hooper and Amina Rubin, CAIR's director of communications and coordinator of communications, respectively. According to the complaint, these two were directly responsible for issuing fraudulent press releases about the Days fraud scheme, thus aiding and abetting the CAIR cover-up.
CAIR officials were not available for comment.

Also addressing the dinner was Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the nation's first Muslim member of Congress. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, reportedly turned down an invitation to address the banquet.

The quick truth about CAIR is that it is nothing but a ‘Front’ for terrorist fund raising, with the agenda of over throwing the United States of America. Something I have been screaming at the FBI about, for the past three and a half years.

CAIR defrauded a number of Muslims recently seeking help with citizenship delays, and then threatened to sue them if they complained to the media, according to a security watchdog group which has obtained internal CAIR documents.

The former legal director of CAIR's Maryland/Virginia chapter shook down Muslim hardship cases for thousands of dollars without providing promised services, officials with the Mapping Sharia Project charge.

CAIR, a legal nonprofit group, promoted the services of the employee, Morris L. "Jamil" Days, whom it publicly described as a civil-rights attorney, even after discovering Days was unlicensed and was fraudulently representing CAIR's clients.

CAIR's board covered up the scandal by paying defrauded Muslim families partial restitution payments while insisting they sign agreements releasing CAIR from legal liability, officials said.

Earlier this year, the board also fired Days and closed the chapter's offices in Herndon, Va. The chapter director, Khalid Iqbal, is no longer with CAIR.

Earlier this year, CAIR launched a $250,000 fundraising campaign that included a promotional on its website touting its mission to help Muslims, particularly those confronting citizenship problems.

"Everyday, CAIR works hard to defend the rights of American Muslims who encounter a delay in gaining citizenship," the group said.

In fact, CAIR has victimized poor Muslim immigrants”, says Gaubatz.
"CAIR continues to put Muslim Americans at risk through the pretense that they represent them in any way," Gaubatz said. "CAIR is receiving support from big foreign donors, not because of their effectiveness in discrimination cases, but because of their false image in the media."

CAIR, which last year was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror-financing case involving Hamas, controls some $7 million in real estate assets in Washington D.C. through a limited liability holding company that includes silent Middle Eastern investors. (Terrorists)

The group has filed a formal complaint against CAIR concerning the fraud with the District of Columbia.

Read an article by WorldNetDaily about CAIR's extensive ties to terrorism .

Although CAIR is a nonprofit organization, it does not disclose complete directories of its staff or advisory boards, and even refuses to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public. But a review of federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that Washington-based CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations.

"Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters," said one FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials.

Congressional leaders say they are warning lawmakers and other Washington officials to disassociate from the group due to its growing terror ties.

"Groups like CAIR have a proven record of senior officials being indicted and either imprisoned or deported from the United States," said U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., co-founder of the House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus.

Since its creation by the world wide Isamic terrorist organization supported by Saudi Araba ‘The Brothehood’ who also created al-Qaida, Hamas and Hisbala, all of the previous directors of CAIR have been indicted and convicted of supporting terrorism. In spite of this CAIR has been a trusted ally of the FBI until this year.

CAIR itself recently was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an alleged scheme to funnel $12 million to the terrorist group Hamas. In the Holy Land Foundation case, federal prosecutors also listed CAIR as a member of the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that gave rise to Hamas, al-Qaida and other terrorist groups. The government will retry the Holy Land case, which ended in a hung jury.
"There was a lot of evidence presented at the recent Holy Land Foundation trial which exposed CAIR and others as front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," Rep. Myrick said.

Still, and in spite of this, CAIR is lobbying House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and other sympathetic members of Congress to pressure the Justice Department to expunge its name from the case, arguing the negative publicity has hurt membership and fundraising. (Fundraising for terrorism) This is why I continue to say that America is ignorantly enabling terrorism.

Although the federal judge during the trial refused a written request by the group to strike its name from the list of co-conspirators, the petition is still pending before the court.

CAIR, which runs 33 offices and chapters nationwide, also recently helped defeat an anti-terror plan by Los Angeles police to map the local Muslim community for terrorist neighborhoods.

Critics like myself counter that CAIR has no legitimate voice to make any complaints, because the group is itself an extremist organization that has employed or appointed to its boards of directors and advisers an inordinate number of radical co-conspirators, suspected and convicted terrorists, and other criminals.

If you wish to skip all the details of which individuals in the CAIR organization has already been found guilty of terrorism against the United States, then page down to THE BOTTOM LINE: However you might want to scan them…

Indeed, the long and growing list, includes:

Muthanna al-Hanooti: The CAIR director's home was raided last year by FBI agents in connection with an active terrorism investigation. Agents also searched the offices of his advocacy group, Focus on Advocacy and Advancement of International Relations, which al-Hanooti operates out of Dearborn, Mich., and Washington, D.C.

FAAIR claims to be a consulting firm raising awareness of Sunni grievances in Iraq, but investigators suspect it's a front supporting the Sunni-led insurgency. Al-Hanooti, who emigrated to the U.S. from Iraq, formerly helped run a suspected Hamas terror front called LIFE for Relief and Development. Its Michigan offices also were raided last September. In 2004, LIFE's Baghdad office was raided by U.S. troops, who seized files and computers.

Al-Hanooti is related to Shiek Mohammed al-Hanooti, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He currently leads prayers at a Washington-area mosque that aided some of the 9/11 hijackers.

The FBI alleges al-Hanooti, an ethnic-Palestinian who also emigrated from Iraq, raised money for Hamas. In fact, "Al-Hanooti collected over $6 million for support of Hamas," according to a 2001 FBI report, and was present with CAIR and Holy Land officials at a secret Hamas fundraising summit held last decade at a Philadelphia hotel.
Prosecutors recently added his name to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Al-Hanooti denies supporting Hamas, although he's praised Palestinian suicide bombers as "martyrs" who are "alive in the eyes of Allah."

Earlier this year, his younger brother, Hamid al-Hanooti, was found dead in Iraq after reportedly being held by local security forces as a suspected terrorist.

Laura Jaghlit: A civil-rights coordinator for CAIR, her Washington-area home was raided by federal agents after 9/11 as part of an investigation into terrorist financing, money laundering and tax fraud. Her husband Mohammed Jaghlit, a key leader in the Saudi-backed SAAR network, is a target of the still-active probe.

Last decade, Jaghlit sent two letters accompanying donations – one for $10,000, the other for $5,000 – from the SAAR Foundation to Sami al-Arian, now a convicted terrorist. In each letter, according to a federal affidavit, "Jaghlit instructed al-Arian not to disclose the contribution publicly or to the media."

Investigators suspect the funds were intended for Palestinian terrorists via a U.S. front called WISE, which at the time employed an official who personally delivered a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden. The same official also worked for Jaghlit's group.
In addition, Jaghlit donated a total of $37,200 to the Holy Land Foundation, which prosecutors say is a Hamas front. Jaghlit subsequently was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the ongoing case.

Abdurahman Alamoudi: Another CAIR director, he is serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. Alamoudi, who was caught on tape complaining bin Laden hadn't killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, was one of al-Qaida's top fund-raisers in America, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

Nihad Awad: For the first time, wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case puts CAIR's executive director at a Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders and activists that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants allegedly hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charitable giving.

During the meeting, according to FBI transcripts, Awad was recorded discussing the propaganda effort. He mentions Ghassan Dahduli, whom he worked with at the time at the Islamic Association for Palestine, another Hamas front. Both were IAP officers. Dahduli's name also was listed in the address book of bin Laden's personal secretary, Wadi al-Hage, who is serving a life sentence in prison for his role in the U.S. embassy bombings. Dahduli, an ethnic-Palestinian like Awad, was deported to Jordan after 9/11 for refusing to cooperate in the terror investigation.

Awad's and Dahduli's phone numbers are listed in a Muslim Brotherhood document seized by federal investigators revealing "important phone numbers" for the "Palestine Section" of the Brotherhood in America. The court exhibit shows Hamas fugitive Mousa Abu Marzook listed on the same page with Awad.

Omar Ahmad: U.S. prosecutors also named CAIR's founder and chairman emeritus as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case. Ahmad too was placed at the Philly meeting, FBI special agent Lara Burns testified at the trial. Prosecutors also designated him as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood's "Palestine Committee" in America. Ahmad, like his CAIR partner Awad, is ethnic-Palestinian.

(Though both Ahmad and Awad were senior leaders of IAP, the Hamas front, neither of their biographical sketches posted on CAIR's website mentions their IAP past.)

Nabil Sadoun: A current CAIR board member, Sadoun has served on the board of the United Association for Studies and Research, which investigators believe to be a key Hamas front in America. In fact, Sadoun co-founded UASR with Hamas leader Marzook. The Justice Department added UASR to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Mohamed Nimer: CAIR's current research director also served as a board director for UASR, the strategic arm for Hamas in the U.S.

(Tellingly, CAIR neglects to mention Nimer's and Sadoun's roles in UASR in their bios.)

Rafeeq Jaber: A founding director of CAIR, Jaber was the long-time president of the Islamic Association for Palestine. In 2002, a federal judge found that "the Islamic Association for Palestine has acted in support of Hamas." In his capacity as IAP chief, Jaber praised Hezbollah attacks on Israel. He also served on the board of a radical mosque in the Chicago area

Rabith Hadid: The CAIR fund-raiser was a founder of the Global Relief Foundation, which after 9/11 was blacklisted by Treasury for financing al-Qaida and other terror groups. Its assets were frozen in December 2001. Hadid was arrested on terror-related charges and deported to Lebanon in 2003.

Siraj Wahhaj: A member of CAIR's board of advisers, Wahhaj was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The radical Brooklyn imam was close to convicted terrorist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, and defended him during his trial.
He was also a featured speaker at the dinner.

Randall "Ismail" Royer: The former CAIR communications specialist and civil-rights coordinator is serving 20 years in prison in connection with the Virginia Jihad Network, which he led while employed by CAIR at its Washington headquarters. The group trained to kill U.S. soldiers overseas, cased the FBI headquarters, and cheered the space shuttle Columbia tragedy. Al-Qaida operative Ahmed Abu Ali, convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush, was among those who trained with Royer's Northern Virginia cell.

Bassam Khafagi: Another CAIR official, Khafagi was arrested in 2003 while serving as CAIR's director of community affairs. He pleaded guilty to charges of bank and visa fraud stemming from a federal counterterror probe of his leadership role in the Islamic Assembly of North America, which has supported al-Qaida and advocated suicide attacks on America. He was sentenced to 10 months in prison and deported to his native Egypt.
Ghassan Elashi

Ghassan Elashi: One of CAIR's founding directors, was convicted in 2004 of illegally shipping high-tech goods to terror state Syria, and is serving 80 months in prison. He's also charged with providing material support to Hamas in the Holy Land Foundation trial. He was chairman of the charity, which provided seed capital to CAIR. Elashi is related to Hamas leader Marzook

Hamza Yusuf: The FBI investigated the CAIR board member after 9/11, because just two days before the attacks, he made an ominous prediction to a Muslim audience. "This country is facing a terrible fate and the reason for that is because this country stands condemned," Yusuf warned. "It stands condemned like Europe stood condemned because of what it did. And lest people forget, Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands."

THE BOTTOM LINE: CAIR, which receives financial backing from Saudi and Emirati royalty, denies charges that it has a secret agenda to Islamize America. But a Muslim Brotherhood document declassified in the Holy Land case reveals that CAIR's parent (the Brotherhood) was among Muslim organizations enlisted in a secret plot to destroy the American system from within and eventually take over this country.

Written early last decade in Arabic, the manifesto lays bare the subversive role of CAIR's forerunner, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and other Muslim groups in America to carry out a "grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by the hands of the believers, so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

CAIR's founder Ahmad, while claiming to be a moderate and patriotic American, last decade told a group of Muslims in Northern California that they are in America to help assert Islam's rule over the country.

Ahmad insists he was misquoted. However, an FBI wiretap transcript quotes Ahmad agreeing with terrorist suspects gathered last decade at the secret meeting in Philadelphia to "camouflage" their true intentions.

He compared it to the head fake in basketball. "This is like one who plays basketball: He makes a player believe that he is doing this, while he does something else," Ahmad said. "I agree with you. Like they say, politics is a completion of war."

What's more, Hooper, CAIR's communications director, also has expressed his wish to overturn the U.S. system of government in favor of an "Islamic" state. "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future," Hooper said in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "But I'm not going to do anything violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through education."

Though conceding he made the remark, Hooper argues that he's never advocated violence. He says he and Muslims like him should work instead through the media and use "education" to help turn America into an Islamic state.

This, my friend, is exactly what they are doing; only it is not education, it is deceptive indoctrination, or more descriptively called “Brainwashing”. It is the deceptive brainwashing of America.

Islam has successfully infiltrated nearly all aspects of our Governments, local, State and Federal, our court system, our security system, the educational system, and the White House.

America is deceived:
Even though bits and pieces of the American government are beginning to wake up from the Islamic deception of a peaceful nation, such as Reprsentitive Sue Myrick, R-N.C, the bulk of the American government is still mesmerized by the almost supernatural deception of the nation of Islam. This is of course aided by the perverted Socialist liberal belief that every one is equal and therefore should be raised to equality by the government to equal social and economic status. So in order to be politically correct one must accept all ideologies and cultures even if its intent is to destroy our own.

Left completely unchecked, America would be and Islamic nation by 2020, not 2050 as Islamic Jihadist project. This only because of the few people that throw an occasional road block in the path of Islam from time to time, such as these nasty grand jury indictments.

I have often said if Islam would organize under one flag and one leader they would be unstoppable. As Islam continues to remain as disorganized as the west is, we have at least an equal chance at defeating them. But if they all hear the beat of a distant drum and begin to march in unison, all 1.9 billion of them, the world would soon be Islam, and the Caliphate will rule the Ummah.

de Andréa

Proof of Life in 2012

President Obama may have to prove his eligibility if he intends to run for re-election in 2012

By de Andréa

While no matter what we do at present, it may prove fruitless in Obama’s obvious masquerade as a U.S. citizen. If he were truly a legal natural born citizen, he would gladly show “proof of life” on U.S. soil at the time of his birth.

In 2012 however, it may be another issue altogether. It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law, but that is exactly what is happening right now in a House committee. It is House Bill #1503

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, has become the sixth co-sponsor of a proposal by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., that would require documentation of eligibility from presidential candidates. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

She has joined Reps. John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; and Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, in support of Posey's H.R. 1503 plan.

The bill's provisions are simple:
"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

It also provides:
"Congress finds that under section 5 of article II of the Constitution of the United States, in order to be eligible to serve as President, an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States who has attained the age of 35 years and has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years."

The sponsors' goal is to have the bill become effective for the 2012 presidential election, and it now is pending in a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

A participant at a forum on a political website noted "average citizens have to have a copy of our birth certificate just to apply for a passport, but the president of the United States doesn't have to show theirs??? This doesn't make sense at all."

Besides the support that is growing in the U.S. House, Sen. Tom Coburn R-Okla says he's in favor of both state and federal demands that future presidential candidates have a formal procedure to document their qualifications.

"The bill requires any federal candidates' campaign committee filing with the Federal Election Commission to produce a copy of the candidate's birth certificate," Coburn wrote. "If the bill makes it to the Senate, I will likely support it."

"The last election is over," Posey said in the interview. "I don't think that outcome is going to change. Personally, I think it's futile to go there, but looking toward the future I think it would be reckless if we do not do everything we could to eliminate problems like that in the future. And that's why I filed the bill. I don't think a Supreme Court would remove a president from office if they heard the case. But ... we should make a good faith effort to make sure that things in the future are as they should be," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: As I said at the beginning of this article: “It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law…” Constitutional law clearly states in Article 2, Section 1, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President..." And yet it seams that we must pass a law that says precisely what Constitutional law (the highest law of the land) already stipulates. How a subsequent federal law can offer credence to Constitutional law is a mystery to me. But it is what it is…

Please write, call, or otherwise contact your Senators and Representative, and ask them to support and vote for HB 1503. Needless to say, even if it passes both the House and the Senate, Obama will veto it. So, beyond that, the Congress must have 2/3’s majority to override. If this doesn’t happen we will likely see Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah as dictator of America for as long as he shall live. As of this writing it is being discussed in the oval office of how to go about abolishing the 22nd Amendment which restricts a president to two terms.

Remember your history: The last Socialist President was F.D.R. who was Dictator for nearly four terms, until he died. Moreover, was also bent on the destruction of a “Free Economy”.

In 2012 tell Obama “WE WANT PROOF OF LIFE” as an American Citizen…

de Andréa

ObamaCare

Is there anything that ‘His Majesty Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah’ isn’t an expert in?

By de Andréa

Obama is CEO of several American manufacturing companies, as well as production manager. He runs several American financial institutions. He is president of the once great United States of America. He is an expert in history and foreign affairs. He is an expert reader of Teleprompters. All this - and he may not even be an American. And if that is not enough, he now wants to be your primary care physician.

"Now that the cameras have been put away and the media is no longer watching, their secret emerges: They are going to cut medical costs by cutting your medical care. Right now! These decisions will not be medical but financial. They will not be based on a doctor's opinion of what his or her patient needs, but a bureaucrat's and an accountant s opinion of what the new health care system can afford,” says political pundit, writer, and speaker, Dick Morris. But that's not all. Morris issues the following dire warning:

"But this is just the very beginning... rationing is coming, and coming soon."

To paraphrase Morris; if you need a CAT scan or an MRI, forget it. If you need antibiotics, forget it. As for potentially life-saving or life-extending treatments, take a number and stand in line. Is that why Barack Obama wants to bankrupt the nation? Isn't America a republic? Do we not all have the God-given right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

Obama describes his health care scheme with the usual pie-in-the-sky rhetoric, claiming – with fingers crossed behind his back – that his approach will heal the sick, miraculously reduce costs, and resurrect a moribund health system.

First – there is nothing wrong with America’s present “Health Care System”. The only negative aspect is cost. If one would just take the time to analyze the reason for the high cost of American health care one would find…One -- good stuff cost more money. One can’t expect a Cadillac limousine health care system to be the price of a Yugo. But that isn’t the largest slice of the ‘Health Care Pie’. Number two, it’s the courts. Don’t you know by now it’s the courts that run the country? It’s the courts that make law; it’s the courts that encourage tort. Lawyers are lined up around the block to prosecute doctors for just doing their job, and it is the best in the world. Take the frivolous law suites out of the equation and you will cut the cost of medicine by a third. And it is not only doctors that pay outrageous and exorbitant liability Insurance premiums, but it is pharmaceutical companies as well. An ever increasing cost of a hospital, a doctor, a hospice, a pharmaceutical company, an ambulance service, anything remotely connected to medicine or health care is that they are fair game for the “Ambulance Chasers” looking for the deep pockets of insurance companies.

Obama has told you that if you want to keep your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor and if you want to keep your present health plan, you'll be able to keep your present health plan. Specifically, Obama said: "If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away."

No, no one will take it away; it will simply be put out of business by the government. Obama can't keep that promise and he knows it.

Jim Lindgren writing for the Internet blog the “Volokh Conspiracy” puts it this way…"If the Obama plan is enacted, a substantial portion of employers will cut their health subsidies — raising their employees' share of contributions to the company plan — in order to drive some of the employees into the government exchange and the public option. Other employers may drop their plans altogether — after all, workers could buy their own coverage in the government exchange — or simply fund part of their workers' participation in the exchange. These changes, which would be the direct results of the implementation of the Obama plan, would make it virtually impossible for Obama to keep these promises...."

Health care rationing:
Will keeping your doctor or your health care provider really matter when government bureaucrats start calling the shots and telling your doctor and provider exactly what they can and cannot do... what they are allowed to treat... what they will pay for?.

Make no mistake, Obama's takeover of health care will be nothing more than a raw power grab, more cogent than his takeover of the banks and the automobile industry. Its goal will not be to improve health care but, to reward political allies with ‘ more power and control’ – and in the process punish people like you.

You can stop him by letting the Congressional leadership know – right now... today – that there will be a political price to pay if they allow the world's best health care system turn into a medical disastrous wasteland.

Let's examine the real repercussions of health care rationing:
Think of it this way, to Obama, people represent health costs. The fewer people, the lower the costs. Are we saying that Obama will target the elderly, the handicapped, and the unborn to reduce costs?

Consider Obama's own words remarks as reprinted in the Washington Times and make that call yourself. "Part of what I think government can do effectively is to be an honest broker in assessing and evaluating treatment options.” Obama also said: "The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill...."

Regarding those in the last phases of life, Obama specifically says: "There is going to have to be a conversation that is guided by doctors, scientists, ethicists. And then there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place. It is very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through the normal political channels." Can you see the tap-dance routine from what he is really saying?

Obama's top health advisers have emphasized that America should value the lives of young, healthy people more than those of old, sick individuals. One such adviser is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Obama's chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel.

Kevin Williamson of National Review Online describes Dr. Emanuel's views: "He wrote in The Lancet in 2008: 'Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination.’ We all were young once, the argument goes, and so denying the elderly and weak in order to care for the young and fit is just."

Just what do you think Obama's talking about here? Trust me, these are scary times and if you're over the age of 55, be concerned, be very concerned. If you're chronically ill with diabetes or high blood pressure or multiple sclerosis – or dying with heart disease or cancer – your future under a rationed healthcare plan doesn't look very bright.

Would Obama empower the federal government and bureaucratic pencil-pushers to decide exactly when your presence on earth is no longer feasible, viable, or sustainable?

Do we really want to find out the answer the hard way?
Obama claims that his health plan won't involve rationing or reduced care. But that's ridiculous, because all government-run health systems suffer from those drawbacks.

For a real-world, practical example, we only need look at the Canadian system.

Dr. David Gratzer, a Canadian-trained physician who practices in the United States, describes his own revelation about Canada's medical horror show: "On [my way to medical school class]... I cut through a hospital emergency room and came upon dozens of people on stretchers – waiting, moaning, begging for treatment. Some elderly patients had waited up to five days in corridors before being admitted to beds. They smelled of urine and sweat. As I navigated past the bodies, I began to question everything I thought I knew about health care – not only in Canada, but also in the United States. ... I had begun a journey into the heart of one of the great policy disasters of modern times."

Is the situation really any better in Europe – should we, for instance, emulate the French?

Consider a French journalist's words at the Heritage Foundation: "The majority of France's state-owned hospitals are managed in a way that is reminiscent of the old U.S.S.R. ... In the average French public hospital, it is not uncommon for every window to be open, even in winter, because the heating system in the building cannot be regulated. With the only options being no heat or unbearably high heat, everyone opts for the latter. Predictably, this is not very cheap."

What about Germany?
The British medical journal Lancet states: "The German health care system is facing bankruptcy on an unprecedented scale."

In Great Britain, one current cost-saving measure is the denial of essential medications to women in advanced stages of certain cancers. And yet, on June 15, Barack Obama told the American Medical Association (AMA) that other developed countries – he meant nations like Canada, Germany, France, and Britain – pay much less per capita for health care than Americans.

Tell us something we don't know... you also get exactly what you pay for. You get a Yugo instead of a Cadillac. And if the government system breaks down and you are left a quadriplegic invalid with brain damage after a surgeon’s stupid mistake or maybe no treatment at all, try to get any just compensation.

So why does Obama want to bring millions of people into the system literally overnight? What happens when there are suddenly many more patients than there are practitioners to care for them?

Will the health care system start to follow the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) model... where you take-a-number.... and wait... and then wait some more? Moreover, if you're really sick, what are the chances that you might die in line, waiting for treatment that simply does not come in time?

Dr. Gratzer tells us what's going on in Canada: "I trained in emergency rooms that were chronically, chaotically, dangerously overcrowded... all across Canada. I met a middle-aged man with sleep problems who was booked for an appointment with a specialist three years later; a man with pain... who was referred to a pain clinic with a two-year wait list; a woman with breast cancer who was asked to wait for four months before starting the life-saving radiation and chemo-therapy."

When you consider the evils of health care rationing, consider the following.
Addressing the AMA, Obama implied that costs were rising because patients were getting unneeded care. In fact, the opposite is true.

A 2003 survey by the Rand Corporation found that only 11% of patients got treatments they didn't need, and 80 present of these were to cover the doctors behind in case of a tort law suite– while a whopping 46% failed to receive needed care because ‘Medicare’ wouldn’t cover the cost. Are you sure you want a government healthcare system?

And strangely, there's tremendous irony in Obama's mindless drive toward a government-run system. In Great Britain, France, Germany – and even Canada – there's a growing push to get people back into private insurance systems again, Hello! -- taking the pressure off public facilities and doctors. It's a move toward – you guessed it –cost savings. Because it doesn’t work.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Government run anything simply doesn’t work, has never worked, and will not work. Can you think of anything, in any part of history, that the government has run, that is better and cheaper than a private system?
It's time to tell Congress – loudly and clearly – that being pushed off a cliff is hazardous to the health of children, old people, and all other living things, as individuals as well as a nation...

It is time to be responsible. Contact your Representative and Senators now.

de Andréa

P.S. The truth is, Obama is not an expert in anything, except deception…

Al-Qaida Speaks

DUBAI Al Jazeera television — Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al-Qaida in Afghanistan, speaks about Pakistani nukes in an interview with Al Jazeera television. “When al-Qaida is in a position to do so, it will use Pakistan's nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States”, Mustafa Abu al-Yazid said in remarks aired on Sunday.

By de Andréa

I have been warning for the past four years about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal falling into the wrong hands, and trust me al-Qaida is the wrong hands.

Pakistan has been battling al-Qaida Taliban allies in earnest in the Swat Valley since April 09 after their thrust into a district 60 miles northwest of the capital raised fears the nuclear-armed country could slowly slip into militant hands.

"god willing, the nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of the Americans, but the mujahideen would take them and use them against the Americans," Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al-Qaida's in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television.

Abu al-Yazid was responding to a question about U.S. safeguards to seize control over Pakistan's nuclear weapons in case Islamist fighters came close to doing so. "We expect that the Pakistani army would be defeated (in Swat) . . . and that would be its end everywhere, god willing."

Asked about the group's plans, the Egyptian militant leader said: "The strategy of the (al-Qaida ) organization in the coming period is the same as in the previous period: to hit the head of the snake, the head of tyranny: the United States. That can be achieved through continued work on the open fronts and also by opening new fronts in a manner that achieves the interests of Islam and Muslims and by increasing military operations that drain the enemy financially."

The militant leader suggested that naming a new leader for the group's unit in the Arabian Peninsula, Abu Basir al-Wahayshi, could revive its campaign in Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter. "Our goals have been the Americans . . . and the oil targets which they are stealing to gain power to strike the mujahideen and Muslims. There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader."

Abu al-Yazid, also known as Abu Saeed al-Masri, said “al-Qaida will continue with large scale operations against the enemy" — by which he meant the United States.

"We have demanded and we demand that all branches of al-Qaida carry out such operations," he said, referring to attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The militant leader said “al-Qaida would be willing to accept a truce of about 10 years' duration with the United States if Washington agreed to withdraw its troops from Muslim countries and stopped backing Israel and the pro-Western governments of Muslim nations”.

Asked about the whereabouts of al-Qaida's top leaders, he said: "Praise god, sheikh Osama (bin Laden) and sheikh Ayman al-Zawahri are safe from the reach of the enemies, but we would not say where they are; moreover, we do not know where they are, but we're in continuous contact with them."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Straight from the horse’s mouth or in this case the ‘Pigs Mouth’, I wouldn’t want to insult horse lovers, pigs after all at least wallow in filth.

Four years ago when everyone was saying that the Pakistani government was stable and there was no chance of their nukes falling into ‘Terrorists Hands’, I said “every Middle Eastern country that exists, has fallen into terrorists hands”.

Here we are four years later nearly looking down the launch tube of a Muslim terrorist nuclear weapon. Moreover our eyes have been on Iran, who doesn’t yet have nuclear capability. If any one of these Muslim controlled countries achieves nuclear capability the west better head for the bomb shelters.

But there is an even more frightening message in this interview than ‘Nukes” and that is ‘Muslim Unity’. …”There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader.” A single leader… Until now Islam has been mostly splintered, with out unity. If Islam actually unites behind a “single leader”, well… you haven’t seen anything yet in the way of Islamic terrorism. A ‘United Islam’ is an extremely dangerous force to all living things.

The West represents the Judeao-Christian World, while the East represents the enemy of all Gods creation…

de Andréa

Obama: Self Indicted

On Obama’s own campaign web site he indicates that "at birth" he was a citizen of Kenya and a subject of Great Britain.

By de Andréa


People ask me why I continue with this quixotic endeavor of this “Birth Certificate” nonsense, because it is becoming more and more bazaar that’s why. Many have also asked me about Obama’s possible motives for hiding it with such tenacity and diligence.

I think therein lies the real question. Not so much of where it is, but why are you hiding it?

Plausible reasons:
Perhaps something in his birth certificate, if it indeed exists, would contradict assertions Obama has already made about his life's story. These might even involve his true parental heritage. Without a real birth certificate, no one really knows who his parents were. So it may be futile even to speculate about whether citizenship could be conferred upon him by his mother, when we don't know for sure who his mother is. After all we only have his word for it, and just how good is Obammah’s word.

Perhaps the certification of live birth reveals a foreign birth, as was the practice in Hawaii in 1961 while still issuing the Hawaiian certification of live birth" we have seen posted on his website. Or perhaps it will show just what Obama has claimed all along – a birth in Hawaii to two officially non-citizen parents, for the purpose of establishing "natural born citizenship" under the Constitution.

What do I mean?
Well, as you know, in 2008, the Senate of the United States held hearings to determine if one of the presidential candidates fulfilled the requirement of being a "natural born citizen”. NO it wasn't Barack Obama. It was John McCain, who was born on a U.S. military base in the Canal Zone of Panama a US territory and Base, to two U.S. citizens.

On April 10 of last year, two senators, both Democrats, Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, introduced a resolution expressing a sense of the Senate that McCain was indeed a "natural born citizen."

It's interesting what Leahy had to say on the subject: "Because he was born to American citizens [emphasis added], there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the U.S. Senate."

And, indeed it was. It was also, interestingly, that it was the only such hearing held by the Congress on the subject of "natural born citizenship" and its application to the 2008 presidential race. Why was that interesting? Because everyone involved in this process knew – or should have known – that the life story told by Barack Obama would raise far more doubts about his eligibility than McCain's, and they didn’t want to open ‘Pandora’s Box’

Notice Leahy did not say one parent citizen would qualify a child for "natural born citizenship." He indicted it would take two.

He did so again at a Judiciary Committee hearing April 3, when he asked then-Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, a former federal judge, if he had any doubts about McCain's eligibility to serve as president.

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff responded – again underlining the fact that both parents would need to be citizens.

And what did Leahy say to that? "That is mine, too."

By the way, Obama voted for this resolution, so he obviously agrees with the definition of what constitutes a "natural born citizen" – the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

Now, I don't know who Barack Obama's parents are, because I have never seen his birth certificate. All I've seen is a facsimile of a "certification of live birth" on the Internet. That document, even if genuine, proves nothing about Obama's birth in Hawaii or who his parents were. Hawaii, just becoming state, had a very slipshod practice in 1961 of issuing these documents to babies born outside the country and listing parents who may not have been the parents at all. All it really indicates is that he was “Born”

But I do know who Barack Obama claims his parents were. According to him, neither one of them was an American citizen able to confer natural born citizenship on a child. First, Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign national from Kenya, and the other, Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son, even if the father had been a citizen and even in the unlikely event Obama was actually born in Hawaii!
So, even if we are to take Obama at his word, he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to serve as president.

If he is to be judged by the same standard as his opponent in the race, there is no way he qualifies. That's what Leahy said. That's what Chertoff said. That's what the law says.

A logical question naturally follows: Why didn't the Congress of the United States hold hearings on Obama's eligibility when they did so on McCain's eligibility?

I'm still trying to figure that one out. Maybe the answer is this simple: Because there's no way Obama would have qualified.

Another logical question follows: Why is this man still serving in the White House and turning the country upside down when he is not even constitutionally eligible? This is the reason I will never let go of this..

By the way, further establishing that it was impossible for Obama to have been a "natural born citizen" are some astonishing words found on his own campaign website. They indicate that Obama was "at birth" a citizen of Kenya and a subject of Great Britain, and that his Kenyan citizenship expired August 4, 1982.

So this answers the question as to why Obama registered as a foreign student at a collage in Los Angles Ca. and also what passport in used to go to Pakistan with in 1981. He was a Kenyan citizen and a British subject, as well as an Indonesian citizen which was required to attend school there.

So, an even bigger question of whether or not Obama was natural born, which it is fairly obvious that he was not, because of several probabilities, is the question of , is he now a citizen of the US, or is he as illegal as if he climbed the fence at the Mexican border?. Moreover, if he is a citizen when did he apply for legal status, green card etc???

So you see the plot thickens, and still no answers, just more and more Questions.

Why did the founders insist upon a "natural born citizen" clause in the Constitution?
To avoid questions of divided loyalties, and unless one is blind or brainwashed one can clearly see that Obama has not only devided loyalties but loyalties to our enemy.

Just scroll down on Obama’s Fight the Smears webpage and read the FactCheck.org excerpt to see this amazing admission for yourself.

So, again, I ask: Why doesn't Obama want to reveal his real birth certificate? Because he wants this discussion of eligibility to go away – once and for all. It is a vulnerability he cannot explain away. So he would rather not discuss it at all.

But let me remind you all, in case you hadn't considered this: Obama plans to run for re-election in 2012.

That's why we can never, ever let this matter rest.

Stop Obama in 2012…

de Andrea

Are The Jews Waking Up?

Jewish organizations are ‘concerned’ about Obama’s schmoozing of Islam

By de Andréa

The deception of Islam has always fascinated me. Why a people would believe the same lies over and over again is truly a prodigious phenomenon. I could understand a few being deceived, but entire nations?

Talking about deception, and the phenomenal ‘degree’ of deception… in my studies of middle eastern Muslim culture which began in AD 610, (not my studies, but the culture) I soon discovered the most deceived people on earth about Islam are the Muslims However, it seems the closer a country is to Islam the more deceived the people are. One would logically conclude for example, that Lebanon would not be fooled by the consistent equivocation spewed out by the Muslim people and yet they benevolently took in the Jordanian terrorists refugees (the Hisbala) and today in the aftermath of the Jihad, Lebanon is now part of the Nation of Islam.

The Jews of Israel are another prime example. These same terrorist refugees from Jordan (only this time the Hamas) decided to call themselves Palestinians (a non historical people) and move in to the Gaza Strip and anywhere else that suited them (as long it was part of Israel) and say that this is their historical country “Palestine”. . The fact that Palestine is not a historical country never seemed to occur to anyone and today it is just taken for granted that these Jordanian terrorists are the nonexistent Palestinians from the nonexistent historical country unknown as Palestine, and what is even more incredible is that it deserves a country of its own which in totality belongs factually and historically to Israel.

Since then there has been numerous treaties between the Israelis and these terrorists, none of which has meant anything at all to the so-called Palestinians. And yet the Jews continue in their attempt to negotiate with the Devil. Are we stuck on stupid or are we just Ignorantly deceived?

But…then, right in the middle of the smoke screen there seems to be a dawning of questions by the Jewish community. President Obama’s strongest supporters among Jewish leaders are deeply troubled by his recent Middle East initiatives, and some are questioning what he really believes in. Is the vial of deception beginning to slip a little?

Malcolm Hoenlein, whose face resembles that of Dick Cheney at first glance, is executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. He says he is only offering his personal views but the conference he represents is a political powerhouse that includes 50 major Jewish groups. Among them are the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), B’nai B’rith International, the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, Hadassah, and the Anti-Defamation League. Hoenlein has been the professional head of the conference since 1986, overseeing its day-to-day activities as the coordinating body for American Jews on issues of concern in the U.S. and globally.

Jewish leaders “are expressing ‘concern’ Hoenlein said, about what was said [in Obama’s Cairo speech], “I’ve heard it from some of his strongest supporters. It’s expected from his detractors. But even people close to him have said to us that there were parts of the speech that bothered and confused them.”

Obama’s speeches to a Muslim audience in Saudi Arabia and Egypt in early June was his second effort early in his administration to rewrite and re-define America’s posture toward the Nation of Islam. In April, Obama traveled to Ankara, Turkey, to offer a similar outreach to Islam where he totally submitted himself and America to King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia by the traditional Muslim bow of submission from his waist to the waist of the king. This single jester of submission to Islam seems to be totally lost on the deceived people of the west.

But many in the Jewish community, including some of Obama’s most ardent supporters, are troubled by his comments in the Middle East, especially his remarks to his Cairo audience. Others are concerned that, facing a multitude of problems on the domestic front, Obama has nevertheless traveled twice to the Middle East without even setting foot in Israel, America’s stalwart ally in the region for more than a half-century.

“There is a lot of questioning going on about what he really believes and what does he really stand for???,” Hoenlein says of Obama’s outreach.

I wonder, is this the dawning of an age???

Reaction to Obama’s speech has drawn a range of reaction from many Jewish leaders. On the right, some have condemned it as a destructive revision of the long and close relationship between the U.S. and Israel. But many on the left who backed Obama were also surprised and dismayed over Obama’s speech. Such reactions from major Jewish leaders have largely remained beneath the surface, exchanged privately among them.

Hoenlein’s comments are his first detailed appraisal of Obama’s speech and represent the first time a major Jewish leader has spoken openly about the erosion of Jewish support for Obama.

Reacting to Obama’s Cairo speech, Hoenlein says, “I have no problem with addressing the Muslim world. I’m in fact in favor of outreach, and we here at the conference have done it for about 12 or 15 years, visiting Muslim countries in Central Asia and the Middle East. But the question is, what is the message they get? It’s not so much what he says, but how do they perceive what he says?” I can’t help but wonder just how all that reaching out to his Muslim brothers has worked out for him

On the one hand, Hoenlein says, “His reference to Israel and the special relationship being unbreakable is important, and references to persecution and Holocaust denial were important, and some of his references to some human rights issues also were important.” But Hoenlein notes the speech included a number of troubling references and comparisons. He cites the fact that Obama claimed America has seven million Muslims. That is a figure “Arab propagandists have put out,” he says. “In fact, they say only six million, when in fact there’s no study that shows even half of that.”

In 2007, the Pew Research Center estimated the Muslim American population at 2.35 million. The Question is, does Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah know something we don’t? Moreover just how did the Pew Research Center estimate the Muslim Population in America? Did they round up all the Muslims terrorists in the Country and have them sound off one by one??? Don’t forget Muslims lie and deceive. Well… maybe Pew is deceived…what’s more important maybe Obama isn’t.

Hoenlein is disturbed that Obama did not mention the Jewish people’s ancient historical connection with the land of Israel. “There was no reference” he said “to the 3,000 years of Jewish connection to this land, And that is again one of the propaganda lies that the Muslims have used: that the Jews are interlopers, that the two physically obvious temples never existed, that there was never any Jewish history in the land of Israel. Even Yasser Arafat and others have used that argument because they’re trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state. I don’t believe that was the president’s intent, but not making those references I think is troubling.” This is beyond troubling Mr. Hoenlein, this is deception. Obammah certainly knows his history; he is banking on the fact that you and the rest of us don’t.

A little history
Jews have claimed a connection to the land of their forefathers since 1400 B.C. more than 2000 years before Islam even existed. Even after the Roman destruction of the Second Temple in 70 A.D. and the dispersal of Jews throughout the Roman Empire, many Jews continued to reside in Jerusalem through the centuries, surviving various invasions. An Ottoman census of Jerusalem conducted in 1845 showed Jews outnumbered Muslim Arabs by almost to 2 to 1 and were the dominant ethnic group in the region. Moreover there never was any Palestine.

Hoenlein believes that the most troubling aspect of Obama’s comments in his Cairo speech was his effort to equate the Nazi killing of more than six million Jews during the Holocaust --- with Israel’s struggle with the Palestinians over six decades and the suffering caused by the displacement of the so-called Palestinians.

“There’s no comparison between the Holocaust, even if it was an indirect one, --- and what happened to Palestinians,” Hoenlein declares. This is where Hoenlien is wrong, really wrong. As he said previously, it doesn’t matter what is said, it matters what is in the mind of Islam. And in Al-Barrack Hussein Obama’s mind and in the mind of Islam what the Israelis are doing to the terrorist Hamas that has squatted on land belonging to Israel is tantamount to what the Nazis did to the Jews. Maybe Hoenlein just needs to open his eyes, ‘a little wider’.

What Hoenlein and the rest of the west doesn’t understand and Obama does, is that the Nazis where just a European modification of the Islamic agenda. Moreover this is a deceptive twisted spin of the connection between Nazism and Islam, in that the Nazis were doing to the Jews what Islam is trying to do, and that is, complete genocide of the Jewish Nation. Notice in his speech, President Obama addressed the issue of the Holocaust head-on, saying “Six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. But he quickly changed the subject, comparing Hitler’s Struggle (Mien Kampf) genocide of the Jews, to the fabricated struggle of the Jews to deny the existence of the ‘Muslim Terrorists’ who deceptively call themselves Palestinians.

One must understand what Obama understands and that is “Mein Kampf” means “My Struggle” and interestingly “Jihad” means “MY STRUGGLE” as well. This is not a coincidence my friend, Nazism was Hitler doing what Muhammad couldn’t achieve. Now Islam is doing what Nazism couldn’t achieve. It is not as Obama is ridiculously portraying and that is that Judaism and Nazism are related. Only a Muslim could twist the truth that out of shape.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I know, I know it is like grasping at cob webs trying to hold on to the cliff we are falling off of. But maybe, just maybe, this will at least lead to the portal of illumination for the Jews. Moreover if the Jews wake up, maybe Israel will as well.

What of the rest of the west?

Well that’s another question isn’t it???

One for which I don’t have an answer.

Not yet anyway…

de Andréa

No Longer a Christian Nation

On April 6, 2009, Obama declared to the Nation of Islam that America was no longer A Christian Nation.

By de Andréa

Watch a video of Rep. Randy Forbes speaking before congress about this Statement made by President Obama.

This Statement, “…we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation…” was made in turkey by Obama as ‘President of the United States of America’ at an Islamic Summit in April if this year.

As you listen to the words spoken by Mr. Forbes you will notice that one of the questions he asks, is the question “What was that moment that we ceased to be so?” [Meaning a Christian nation] While he uses the whole speech to answer the first question which was “Whether or not we ever considered ourselves a Judeo-Christian nation”, he gives examples of when it wasn’t the time when we lost our Christian Heritage, but he never answered the question “What was that moment that we ceased to be so?”

Well… risking my life and the life and safety of my family, I will answer that question: It was when Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah became President of these United States and said, “…we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation”…Moreover, we became an Islamic nation when he said, “America is one of the largest Muslim Nations in the world”. And if that isn’t enough, he bowed down ‘in submission’ to the King of Islam King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz the King of the Wahhabist terrorist State of Saudi Arabia. That my friend, is when we lost our Christian Heritage as well as our freedom and handed it to the enemy of this world.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Representative Randy Forbes it trying to get it back, by introducing the ‘Spiritual Heritage Resolution’, dubbed as the ‘The Forbes Resolution’.

Watch for it…

de Andréa

The Good Guys Are Now The Bad Guys

And worse than that, the bad guys are now the new good guys.

By de Andréa

If a mother sees her child being molested and she slaps the assailant with her purse, she is now a hate criminal because this is now a protected class of perverts . There are other protected classes in here. I mean simple exhibitionism. I have female friends who have told me over the years that some guy flashed them, and their immediate reaction was to hit them with their purse or throw something heavy at them. Well now, he's committed a misdemeanor, [and] she has committed a federal hate crime because the exhibitionism is protected under the sexual orientation clause... Rep. Gohmert is correct: IT IS SO WRONG!

Originally introduced as SB-909 and dubbed as the “pedophile protection bill” now, Senate Democratic leaders are pushing the federal "hate crimes" bill to the floor of the Senate secretly on the back of another unrelated bill... and send it to Barack Obama to be signed into law! They have said that they won't even be allowing ANY hearings or amendments to this outrageous perverted legislation

Why would they do things this way? Why would they prevent any discussion of this bill in a committee hearing? Why would they not simply bring up their "hate crimes" bill as a standalone bill?

Because of YOU, and thousands more like you across the country! Thanks to all of our efforts, Senate Democrats are scared to death to allow the communist hate bill to be opened to public scrutiny and Republican attack as the "Pedophile Protection Act" that it is.

The sexually perverted radical liberal "leaders" in the U.S. Senate are ready to propose their "hate crimes" bill as an amendment QUICKLY, as soon as they decide what "must-pass" legislation they want to attach it to. That could happen ANY TIME now, with passage of this new bill within a week -- which means we have to FIGHT HARD NOW TO STOP IT!

TELL YOUR senator and congressman TO REJECT THIS "THOUGHT CRIME PEDOPHILE PROTECTION" BILL, HOW EVER IT IS CALLED OR NUMBERED OR HIDDEN:

Different strokes for different folks:
Whatever happened to "equal justice for all"? As Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) stated, "Under this bill, justice will no longer be equal. Justice will now depend on the race, gender, sexual orientation, disability or other protected status of the victim. It will allow different penalties to be imposed for the same crime. This is the real injustice."

We all know that every year, many violent crimes are committed out of hate. But just as many violent crimes, if not more, are motivated by something other than hate - whether it's greed, jealously, desperation, or revenge, to name a few. A person's motivation for committing a violent crime is usually complex, and often we can only guess as to why he or she did it.

What difference does it make, every violent crime is deplorable -- regardless of its motivation. Every violent crime can be devastating not only to the victim and their family, but also to the larger community whose sense of safety has been violated. That's why ALL violent crimes must be vigorously prosecuted.

But this bill goes MUCH, MUCH FARTHER than simply prosecuting violent crime -- it creates a new "protected class" of people that would now be protected under "hate crimes" definitions. That means that this bill will protect all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or "Paraphilias" listed by the American Psychiatric Association! This would provide a HUGE MASS of "sacred cows" in our society, which includes pedophiles who would be given elevated protection -- giving "the offender" an additional decade behind bars.

Moreover, just try to protect yourself or your loved one from an attack by one of these sexual perverts and you could find yourself in jail. Women could no longer fight off a rapist because they would be charged with a hate crime of assault on a protected group of sexual deviants.

And the "offender" could be YOU! If a pedophile tries to molest your daughter, or your nephew, or your granddaughter, or some little boy in the street -- if you step in and beat the pedophile to get him away, YOU could spend ten years in prison for your "offense"!

I am NOT exaggerating, this is law. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), who supports this horrendous bill, admitted that the bill would protect all 547 forms of sexual deviancy listed by the APA.

Here's what Hastings said on the floor of the U.S. House itself:
“This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these "Philias" and fetishes and "isms" that were put forward need not live in fear because of who and what they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”

Apparently, supporters of this bill have no problem with sexual deviants, including pedophiles, getting a higher level of protection against you and me!

The far-left sexual perverts such as Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced their version of bill into the Senate... and since they know this immoral perversion of the law can't pass as a "stand-alone" bill, they're going to try to get a vote on it as a hidden amendment to another bill without even going through a committee hearing!

In George Orwell's classic book, "1984," the State was constantly cracking down on what they called "thought crimes" -- that is, you didn't face prosecution just because of what you DID -- but also because of what you THOUGHT.

That is EXACTLY what this "hate crime" bill will do -- it blurs the lines between violent belief, which is constitutionally protected, and violent action, which is not. If we go down this road, where does it end? With speech monitors and thought police?

As Janet Porter of Faith2Action noted, "Pushing away an unwelcome advance of a homosexual, transgendered, cross-dresser or exhibitionist could make you a felon under this new law. Speaking out against the homosexual agenda could also make you a felon if you are said to influence someone who pushes away or otherwise defends themselves against an unwelcome advance. And pedophiles and other sexual deviants would enjoy an elevated level of protection while children, seniors, veterans, and churches would not."

Rep. Gohmert warned that this law would be used against pastors -- or anyone else -- who speaks against homosexuality or other alternative sexual lifestyle choices, saying that it provides that anyone who through speech "induces" commission of a violent hate crime "will be tried as a principal" alongside the active offender.

Critics say it would allow for prosecutions against pastors who preach a biblical ban on homosexuality if someone who hears such a message later is accused of any crime. A pastor's sermon could be considered "hate speech" under this legislation if it's heard by someone who then commits an act of violence against someone based on "sexual orientation.” The pastor could be prosecuted for "conspiracy to commit a hate crime.”

Don't think this could happen? Well it already has…
Some while back I wrote about similar state laws that have resulted in persecution for Christians. I wrote about an incident in Philadelphia that occurred a few years ago, it was about a 73-year-old grandmother that was jailed for trying to share Christian tracts with people at a homosexual festival. And Canada, which already has severely restrictive "hate crime" laws, government "Human Rights Commissions" review any "suspect" speech or actions that might be perceived as being against any of their "protected classes."

So today, Canada has a major national magazine, a federal political party leader and a registered political party, a major Catholic newspaper (Catholic Insight) and an internationally renowned journalist (Mark Steyn) -- all of whom are being investigated by appointed "hate speech therapists" from the commissions. Even Focus on the Family, one of the largest Christian publishing and broadcasting organizations in America, has admitted that it has been reviewing, and if necessary editing, its broadcasts to avoid complications with Canadian "hate crimes" laws.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Under this new law, I could be brought up on charges, prosecuted, and jailed for just writing or thinking about this subject.

I say bring it on, I will not be stopped, muzzled, edited, or censored.

Moreover if I am arrested and jailed, I hope they have enough duck tape to shut my mouth.

THIS MY FRIEND, IS WHAT WE FACE IN OUR FUTURE

Contact you State Senators and your local Representative. Let them know what you know about the moral decay of our congress and this administration.

You can use the sample letter at the end of this article:

Tell them to vote against SB-909 or watch for it as attachment to an unrelated bill or you will get out the vote against them no matter what office they run for.

We the people: in order to form a more perfect union….

Is it going to be “We the people” or “They, the corrupt perverted dictators”? You decide…

de Andréa

The Honorable ___________
[Room #] if available
Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator: [name]

I am writing to urge you to do all in your power to oppose passage of S. 909, also known as "The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act."

Passage of this bill by the U.S. Senate would be reckless and irresponsible not only because of the "chilling effect" it would have on First Amendment-guaranteed rights to free speech, but also because it would provide, for the first time ever, special legal protections for pedophiles and other sexual offenders.

This bill would more appropriately be called "The Pedophile Protection Act."

The evidence for this extraordinary statement comes directly from debate in the House, when a simple amendment to exempt pedophiles from the protections offered by the bill were rejected.
I write to warn you that those who support it, or allow it to become the law of the land without a fight, will be held accountable at election time.

If there was ever a time for the Senate to stand and fight with a filibuster, that time is now. We are calling for members of the Senate, Republicans and Democrats alike, to stop S. 909.

Stop "The Pedophile Protection Act" dead in its tracks – now.

Please respond to me in writing as to whether you intend to oppose this dangerous bill – including by filibuster if necessary.

Sincerely,
Your name
Your address

Obama Breeds Climate of Hate Against Jews and Christians

Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz is a member of the Reform movement of Judaism and serves as a chaplain for the State of New York. A former U.S. Navy and Marine Corps officer and chaplain, he has also served as deputy national chaplain for the Jewish War Veterans of the United States.

As you read this letter from someone connecting the dots about President Obama’s actions and speech, watch for the confusion in Rabbi’s Pomerantz writing, as to why Obama is doing this? Seemingly looking for a reason for Obama’s ignorance of history etc. I can give the only answer that fits all the questions. Just as Hitler was a Nazi, Obama is a Muslim sleeper terrorist. Think about it as you read this cry for understanding.

de Andréa
June 11, 2009

The following:
By Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz

Our new president did not tell a virulent anti-Semite to travel to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington to kill Jews, but he is most certainly creating a climate of hate against us.

It is no coincidence that we are witnessing this level of hatred toward Jews as President Barack Obama positions America against the Jewish state.

Just days ago Obama traveled to Cairo, Egypt. It was his second trip in a short time to visit Muslim countries. He sent a clear message by not visiting Israel.

But this was code
.
In Cairo, Obama said things that pose a grave danger to Jews in Israel, in America and everywhere.

And if his views are not vigorously opposed they will help create a danger as great as that posed by the Nazis to the Jewish people.
Just last week, Obama told his worldwide audience — more than 100 million people — that the killing of six million Jews during the Holocaust was the equivalent of Israel’s actions in dealing with the Palestinians.

This remark is incredible on its face, an insult to the six million Jews who died as a result of Hitler’s genocide — and it is a form of revisionism that will bode evil for Jews for years to come.

While Obama acknowledged that “six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today” — his discussion about the Holocaust was followed by this statement: “On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people — Muslims and Christians — have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.”

“On the other hand . . . ”?

Obama’s clever construct comparing the mass genocide of six million Jews to the Palestinian struggle will not be lost on the estimated 100 million Muslims who tuned into to hear him.

Perhaps it was not lost on James W. von Brunn, the 88-year-old white supremacist identified as the alleged attacker Wednesday at the Holocaust Museum. He apparently felt that he could easily take retribution against the Jews for the atrocities Obama implies they are guilty of.

At first blush Mr. Obama’s speech seemed rosy, optimistic — one that espoused tolerance and understanding.

If you scratch the surface it is a dangerous document that history will view as a turning point for America and Israel — one that will lead to dangerous times ahead for both Jews and believing Christians.

The immediate danger posed by Obama’s speech is in its incredible re-writing of the history of Jews, Christians and Muslims from Medieval times to the present.

Obama, continually throughout his speech, talks of Islam’s peaceful intent. And while there are certainly Koranic verses that support this interpretation, Islam has a long and bloody history of violence against fellow Muslims, Jews and Christians.

Has Obama not heard about the Muslim’s violent conquest of the Middle East, Spain and half of Western Europe? Was he never taught that the Crusades sought to turn back this Muslim onslaught that demanded subjugated populations convert or die?

In his almost hour-long speech, there is not a single word about Islam’s well known and checkered past.

Ironically, the American president offered plenty of references to what he sees are America’s evils, such as its “colonialism” and history of slavery.

“For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation,” Obama told his audience, citing a litany of American shortcomings. He failed to mention that Arab Muslims were the greatest slave traders in the history of humanity.

According to Obama, Israelis, too, are guilty of wrongdoing, especially when it comes to their supposed maltreatment of the Palestinians.

Isn’t it odd an American president would go to a foreign country and slander his own country and its long-time ally?

At the same time he praises — unconditionally — a religion and culture that has a long history of being antithetical to the very values that have made America a great nation?

Mr. Obama even has the unbelievable gall, when talking about the treatment of Muslim women, to condemn Western countries for attempting to stop Muslim women from using the full facial cover, or hijab. This is a symbol of Muslim subjugation of women.

Listen to what Obama said: “Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit - for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.”

And Obama not only ignores the gross subjugation of women in many Arab societies — he does not mention even once the almost total religious intolerance throughout the Muslim world against Christians and Jews.

In his speech, Obama’s only plea for Muslim women living in Muslim countries is that they should be afforded an education.

How about a discussion of the beheading of Arab women for “crimes” such as adultery? How about the malicious treatment of women in Muslim countries who choose not to wear the hijaab?

Obama insists that Islam has promoted tolerance and that in Islamic societies such ideals have flourished.

Obama claimed that “as a student of history” he understands more than most the truth about “civilization's debt to Islam.”

He added, “And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”

Does he not know that a Jew or Christian would be beheaded in Saudi Arabia for practicing their religion today, now, this minute?

Of course, Obama offers not one example of where religious freedom is truly tolerated in the Muslim world. Yet, he proudly told his audience that in every state of the union and throughout the U.S. there exist more than 1,200 mosques.

But why, Mr. President, is there no Christian Church or Jewish synagogue operating within the borders of Saudi Arabia? Not even one.

Why in many countries, including your host Egypt, Christian churches have suffered vicious and continual persecution? Why is a once vibrant Cairo Jewish community — a home for the likes of Maimonides — today practically extinct?

Why, dear president, has the ancient Christian community in the West Bank and places like Bethlehem been almost completely wiped out by the modern Muslim onslaught?
“On the other hand,” to quote you Mr. President, you avoided mentioning some other truths.

Let’s start with the Israeli Arabs who can claim one of the highest standards of living in the Arab world. Indeed, they have more rights than Arabs in any Muslim country, their religious freedom is completely protected, and they even vote in free elections.

Tell me what Muslim country matches Israel’s record in protecting its minorities?
Even Arabs in the West Bank, during the time of Israeli control, saw their standard of living rise dramatically. Today, Arabs there are among the best educated in the world, thanks to Israel.

In your revisionist view, Israel has acted to harm these people. But it was not Israel that could not abide by United Nations resolutions clearly setting borders for both the state of Israel and an entity that had never existed before named Palestine.

You cleverly omitted any discussion of these facts, or the continual attacks against the state of Israel over six decades by its Muslim neighbors. Nor is it the Israelis who persecute from time to time the Coptic Christians of Egypt.

No, Mr. President, I do not accept your assertion that you are seeking religious tolerance or that you are seeking to protect Jews. I do not accept it because you are inventing a false history to fit your own agenda.

Mr. President, I am deeply disturbed that you would offer such a distortion of truth in the hopes of creating a lasting peace. A lasting peace cannot be created out of lies, distortions and half truths.

You profess to be a Christian. But you seem more intent on protecting Muslims. In your speech you talked openly of your Muslim heritage, your admiration of their way of life, and so forth. You said in your speech that you have made one of your chief aims of your presidency repairing the image of Islam.

Why did you hide these views from the American public during the recent presidential campaign?

Why, as president, did you fully bow to the Saudi king, who refuses to allow any religious freedom for any Christian or Jew?

You have made clear, by your words and assertions, that you are re-positioning the United States away from Israel, America’s lone democratic ally in the Mid-East.

You have made clear through your statements and those of your minions that Israel should, under no circumstances, prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

And yes, you have promised to retaliate against Iran if it ever attacks Israel with nuclear weapons.

But you know full well that if Iran succeeds in its admitted goal of “wiping the Jewish state off the map” — and hits this tiny nation with nuclear warheads — there will be no Israel for the U.S. to retaliate on behalf of
.
Some Jews may be naïve, but we are not stupid.

****************

Some Christians are deceived as well Rabbi but they are not stupid either.
Thanks you sir for your keen observations.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Because the Rabbi is obviously not deceived by Obama’s rhetoric, I can only guess that he also knows that Obama is a Muslim bent on the destruction of America and the Judeao-Christian Western culture. His position may prevent him from directly saying so and hopes someone like myself who has nothing to loose but his life will express the obvious.

I hope you also; have the foresight, intuition or just the plain ability to see what is right in front of your nose. And shake off the shroud of deception that surrounds this man that has miraculously ascended from nowhere to the most powerful position in the world.

This is a very dangerous man to children and other living things.

de Andréa

Women And Islmic Sharia Law

Unless we…that’s you and me, stop and reverse Sharia in America this is just one of the ideological aspects of the so-called “Peaceful Nation of Islam” that is coming to a neighborhood near you.

By de Andréa
June 10, 2009

In the very near future ‘Islamic Sharia Law’ will become more and more integrated into the system of American culture as it has in Europe. One only needs to take a short look at what has transpired in Great Brittan to see what is coming to America. Act for America will soon begin the launch of their 2009 “Stop Shariah Now” campaign. This will be an integrated grassroots, lobbying and public relations effort designed to raise public awareness and push for public policies that expose Shariah law and its infiltration into the United States.

Shariah Islamic law has already infiltrated America through vehicles such as Shariah compliant finance products offered by major financial institutions, including UBS, AIG, Citibank and HSBC. It has been reported that members of the Muslim Students Association in southern California have been seen chanting their demands for Shariah law during public demonstrations. We have also seen reports that estimate between 50,000 and 100,000 Muslims in America are practicing polygamy, a practice allowed under Shariah law.

Recently, a report surfaced on the internet that Lisa Ashton, a flight attendant with British Midland Airways, was fired for refusing to wear a traditional Islamic robe and walk behind male colleagues while in public in Saudi Arabia. This is the consequence of Shariah law in a society and a Western nation’s effort to bend over backwards with multicultural political correctness to accommodate it.

The next time you hear someone claim that Islam affords equal rights and protections to women, pull out the “Top 10” list below. You might also want to add one of the hadith (sayings and traditions of Mohammed), Mohammed claimed he was given a look into hell and saw that it was filled mostly with women because they were ungrateful to their husbands (Sahih Bukhari 2,18,61).

Top 10 Quran quotes every woman MUST SEE:
Tell every woman you know about these verses. The oppression of women that Islam advocates is not only disturbing, but is direct contrast with everything that Western civilization stands for when it comes to the rights of women.

These are referenced from an article published from the American Thinker in 2005. Each one goes into much greater detail if you are interested in reading more on each verse. The article is here: Top 10 rules in the Quran that oppress women

10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.
The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004)

9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.
The Quran in Sura 2:228 says: Wives have the same rights as the husbands have on them in accordance with the generally known principles. Of course, men are a degree above them in status . . . (Sayyid Abul A’La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an, vol. 1, p. 165)

8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.
The Quran in Sura 4:11 says: The share of the male shall be twice that of a female . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 311)

7. A woman’s testimony counts half of a man’s testimony.
The Quran in Sura 2:282 says: And let two men from among you bear witness to all such documents [contracts of loans without interest]. But if two men be not available, there should be one man and two women to bear witness so that if one of the women forgets (anything), the other may remind her. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 205).

6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man and then this second man divorces her.
The Quran in Sura 2:230 says: And if the husband divorces his wife (for the third time), she shall not remain his lawful wife after this (absolute) divorce, unless she marries another husband and the second husband divorces her. [In that case] there is no harm if they [the first couple] remarry . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 165)

5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.
(This could be your daughter, wife, or mother)
The Quran in Sura 4:24 says: And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people, except those who have fallen in your hands [as prisoners of war] . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319).

4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.
The Quran in Sura 4:3 says: And if you be apprehensive that you will not be able to do justice to the orphans, you may marry two or three or four women whom you choose. But if you apprehend that you might not be able to do justice to them, then marry only one wife, or marry those who have fallen in your possession. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 305)

3. A husband may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.
The Quran in Sura 4:129 says: It is not within your power to be perfectly equitable in your treatment with all your wives, even if you wish to be so; therefore, [in order to satisfy the dictates of Divine Law] do not lean towards one wife so as to leave the other in a state of suspense. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 381)

2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded).
The Quran in Sura 4:34 says: 4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (Haleem, emphasis added)

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.
The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says: 65:1 O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617, emphasis added)

THE BOTTOM LINE: I can’t help wonder what women’s lib would do with this if they just knew the truth. But of course virtually no one in the west knows much of anything about Islamic Sharia Law. The unfortunate part of that is by the time people become aware of Sharia, it will already be too late to stop it.

As the saying goes: “It is not a matter of ‘if’, but a matter of ‘when’”. So when is the Terror of Islamic Sharia Law coming to the United States of America? Let me tell you a profoundly big secret, where there is one Muslim there is Sharia Law. At present and according the President of these United States, “America is one of the largest Islamic Nations in the world.”

Couple that statement with another made by our Muslim President: “America is no longer a Christian Nation” and one has a culture that is ready to except Islam as their culture, their society, their religion, their government, their entire way of life.

So you see it is not a question of ‘if’ or even ‘when’ because Islamic Sharia Law has been in America for decades. Now, it is just a matter of time until Sharia totally and completely envelopes our own culture and way of life.

This is a common mistake made by the west. We believe that cultures can integrate, assimilate, and come together into one stew pot. ‘This is what America is’ after all. With all other cultures in the world this can be true; America is a prime example of that. But the Nation of Islam is unlike any other culture on the planet. It is contrary to any other religion, ideology, or philosophy. It does not assimilate it proliferates.

I understand that no one wants to hear the truth, but I am going to say it anyway. Islam will never become Christian. Christians will become Muslims or Slaves of Islam or the third option is always of course… Death

Can we stop this from happening, yes! But the big question is ‘will we’

Answer…NO!

I hope for all our sakes that I am wrong…

Join Act for America now and help stop Sharia in America.

de Andréa

America’s Muslim President Speaks

“The number of Muslims in the U.S. would make America one of the largest Muslim countries in the world," claimed President Obama in an interview released this week.

By de Andréa

His assertion, which is factually inaccurate on a percentage of population bases, comes a day before he is set to deliver a much-anticipated address to the Muslim world from his unholy land of Saudi Arabia, and of course, Cairo Egypt.

Al-Obammah says "Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslims Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. And so there's got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples." This from a man that thinks there are 52 States.

In all fairness to Obama however, I may be one of the few who knows what he meant. Even though there are only approximately 8 million Muslims in the U.S. or a little less that 3 percent of the population, (and growing faster than any other religious group I might add) putting America about 50th in percentage of Muslim population, 8 million is in fact one of the largest Muslim populations of any country in the world. For example the State of Michigan alone has a population of Muslims greater than the entire country of Afghanistan.

Another one of his confusing statements is that “America is no longer a Christian Nation, America is an Islamic Nation”.

Moreover don’t forget the Statement he let slip, that he is “proud of his Muslim Faith”

From this vantage point, two events this week appear to be ominous straws in the wind, warnings of a "man-caused" maelstrom that may inexorably plunge the Middle East into another, potentially cataclysmic war.

The first is the fact that Israel feels obliged to undertake an unprecedented, country-wide civil defense exercise this week. At one point in its course, every man, woman and child in the Jewish State is supposed to seek shelter from a simulated attack of the kind Iran may shortly be able to execute against it.

The second is President Obama's latest effort to reach out to the Muslim world, this time on June 4 from one of its most important capitals, Cairo. There, he is expected to make an address that will reiterate his previous statements on the subject - pronouncements that, unfortunately, can only have been interpreted by his intended audience as acts of submission.

Be prepared for an abandonment of Israel
If past is prelude, the President of the United States will: apologize yet again for purported offenses against Muslims by his country; he will promise to be respectful of Islam, including those who adhere to its authoritative, if virulent, theo-political-legal program known as Shariah; and enunciate diplomatic priorities and initiatives designed to reach out to America's enemies in the region, while putting excruciating pressure on its most reliable ally there, Israel.

This pressure has become more palpable by the day. It has taken various forms, including: U.S. stances adopted at the United Nations that will serve to isolate Israel; blank political and even financial checks for Palestinian thugs like Mahmoud Abbas; diminishing U.S.-Israeli cooperation on intelligence and military matters; and the withholding from Israel of helicopters (and perhaps other weaponry) being provided to Islamic terrorist states.

Perhaps the most chilling example of this coercive pressure so far, however, was originally reported in the Israeli paper Yediot Aharonot and given international prominence by my contact at the Jerusalem Post columnist and editor, Caroline Glick listen to a speech by Caroline Glick. According to these accounts, in a recent lecture in Washington, U.S. Army Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, the American officer charged with training Palestinian military forces in Jordan, made a shocking declaration.

In Carol Glick's words,
"[Gen. Dayton] indicated that if Israel does not surrender Judea and Samaria within two years, the Palestinian forces he and his fellow American officers are now training at a cost of more than $300 million could begin killing Israelis.” She went on to note that neither the general nor the Obama administration seemed to find this prospect grounds for rethinking the wisdom of such a training-and-arming program. In fact, her column observed that Defense Secretary Robert Gates "just extended Dayton's tour of duty for an additional two years and gave him the added responsibility of serving as Obama's Middle East mediator George Mitchell's deputy."

Taken together with the U.S. administration's refusal to come to grips with what truly is the most serious threat to peace in the Middle East - Iran's rising power and growing aggressiveness, reflecting in part its incipient nuclear weapons capabilities - the stage is being inexorably set for the next, and perhaps most devastating, world conflict. Maybe what the Bible refers to as Armageddon.

Whether the signals Mr. Obama is sending are intended to communicate such a message or not, they are going to be read by Israel's enemies as evidence of a profound rift between the United States and the Jewish State. In this part of the world, that amounts to an invitation to an open season on Israel.

It is hard to believe that the Obama Middle East agenda enjoys the support of the American people or their elected representatives in Congress. Historically, the public and strong bipartisan majorities on Capitol Hill have appreciated that an Israel that shares our values, that is governed democratically and that is in the cross-hairs of the same people who seek our destruction is an important ally. Quite apart from a sense of moral and religious affinity for the Jewish people's struggle to survive in their ancient homeland, most of us recognize that it is in the United States' strategic interest to stand with Israel.

It is understandable that a Muslim like Mr. Obama does not appear to share this appreciation. Because as he says America is not only a Muslim Nation it is one of the largest Muslim Nations on the planet. Better get your prayer rug and get used to it. To those who are worried about his affinity and submission to the Saudi king and Islam, and more generally his longstanding ties to virulent critics of Israel like Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi and former Harvard professor-turned-National Security Council staffer Samantha Power, the President's attitude is not exactly a surprise. It is supported by the friends he makes.

THE BOTTOM LINE: As the implications of President Obama's Mideast policies - for the United States as well as Israel - become clearer, that he is nothing but a Muslim terrorist, he will hopefully find himself facing the sort of popular and congressional revolt that has confronted him in recent weeks on Guantanamo Bay where he wants to release his terrorist friends into the American/Islamic culture. The question is: Will such a reaffirmation of American solidarity with and support for Israel come in time to prevent the winds of war being whipped up by Mr. Obama's Muslim posturing and rhetoric - and driving Israelis into bomb shelters - from wreaking havoc in the Middle East, and perhaps far beyond?

We may want to re-evaluate: Just who the enemy of freedom really is…

de Andréa

Obammah Continues to Bow to His King

It wasn’t a mistake in protocol, oh no, it was an exhibition of submission to Islam.

By de Andréa
June 3, 2009

So you still don’t think that Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah is a Muslim sleeper terrorist that has awaken and will deliver Israel and America into the Hands of the World Nation of Islam???

Then lookie what we have here:
Obama, who said we are no longer a Christian Nation because we are now a Muslim Nation, has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Saudi Arabia and four of its princes from being held accountable for their role in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States that killed 3,000 Americans. I certainly new this was coming.

As Obammah plans his trip to his unholy land of Saudi Arabia --- and via the solicitor general, Elena Kagan, the Obama administration has asked that the Saudis be held immune under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, (FSIA) even though there is ample evidence of involvement by the Saudi government and the named princes in support of the al-Qaeda attack.

As president of the United States, Obama has just offered your support to Islam for the unprovoked 9/11 attack on the sovereign country of America.

While the FSIA generally protects a sovereign state, there are exceptions under which its provisions can be invoked. Such interpretations are left largely to the courts to determine.

Saudi Arabia is the Capital of Sunni Wahhabist Islam; it is the birth place of Muhammad and the perverted religion of Muslims and the throne of Allah the Dominic god of the world Nation of Hell. Moreover it is the home of Mecca the unholy city of Obammah, who believes as Louis Farrakhan said Al-Obammah is the resurrected twelfth Caliphate of Islam.

Families of the 9/11 victims, however, have rightly expressed outrage over the Obama administration's filing. They are correct that the action undermines the continuing fight against terror. It is too bad that they do not comprehend that this is exactly the point of the action.

In its recent friend-of-the-court brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in "Federal Insurance Co. vs. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," the Obama administration asked the court to deny a petition for a "writ of certiorari," (or a higher court hearing,) by the families of the victims of 9/11 in their effort to sue Saudi Arabia and its princes.

In the original case filed in 2006, the families of the 9/11 victims allege Saudi Arabia and four Saudi princes acting in their capacity as high-level government officials and as individuals made donations to “Islamic charitable organizations” with the knowledge that the so-called charities were of course giving the funds to al-Qaida. In response, the Saudi government invoked the FSIA as a basis to preclude a lawsuit by the 9/11 victims' families.

In August 2008, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the 2006 ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Casey in dismissing the claim against Saudi Arabia. The dismissal covered the four princes, a Saudi banker, and a Saudi charity. In addition, the appeals court said that the exceptions to immunity didn't apply since the State Department had not designated Saudi Arabia as a state sponsor of terrorism.

There appears, however, to be a possible conflict in what the FSIA allows and a portion of a U.S. statute [28USC1605(a)] which states, in effect, that a foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts if the attack and funding for it occurred in the U.S.

"Although the United States disagrees in certain respects with the analysis of the court of appeals, further review by this Court to determine the best legal basis for that immunity is unwarranted," Kagan wrote.

Fifteen of the 19 terrorists who hijacked U.S. aircraft and crashed them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon on 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia and were affiliated with al-Qaida. Intelligence and past actions link the Saudi government and the four princes with al-Qaida.

"In effect, Obama announced its opposition to allowing 9/11 victims and their families full access to the U.S. legal system in (the government's) effort to protect Saudi Arabia and its princes from being held accountable for their role in the attack on the United States," said Peter Leitner, who has assisted terror victims' families successfully in suing terrorist organizations for the past 12 years.

"As power of Attorney for the family and estate of John P. O'Neill, former FBI (counter-terrorism) expert, I find it disgusting that the Obama administration has spat in the faces of these victims just as (Obama) prepares to leave for Egypt and Saudi Arabia while advocating for the closing of (the U.S. Guantanamo prison in Cuba) and giving full access to the U.S. court system to the terrorists currently imprisoned there," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Disgusting yes, surprising no. I predicted that AL- Barrack Hussein Obammah would do this and more as soon as he announced his candidacy for the First Black Muslim President of the United States of America.

Couple this with his abandonment of Israel, his encouragement of Iran to destroy Israel, his total submission to the King of Islam, his aid to terrorist Hamas in Gaza and on and on and on.

Just what does need to happen before America wakes up from their blind deaf and dumb slumber or drunken stupor or the politically correct drugs we are being fed by the Federal education system and the indoctrination of the Socialist communist media that exists in this country.

I predict that within the next 5 years, half of the nation will be so brainwashed and the other half minus a few like you and me, will be so lazy or scared to lift a finger to save what little they have left of their freedom. Moreover, America will be totally Islamic and under the control of Saudi Arabia and Sharia law.

And Obama will give it to them on a silver platter.

What do you think? Or maybe a better question would be to ask, are you are still among the independent thinkers, able to see the picture after connecting the dots…

de Andréa

Kill Gitmo Detainees

While Cheney doesn’t actually advocate lining up all the terrorist detainees at Gitmo and machine gunning them down, he says it is the only alternative to keeping them incarcerated until at least the end of the war with Islam.

By de Andréa

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that the only alternative to holding suspected terrorists indefinitely would be to execute them, arguing against the Obama administration's plans to close the Guantanamo detainee prison and releasing the prisoners. "If you're going to be engaged in a world conflict such as we are, such as the global war on terrorism, if you don't have a place where you can hold these people, your only other option is to kill them," Mr. Cheney said. "And we don't operate that way."

The former vice president's statements only raise the stakes in fierce debate with his critics, who believe Mr. Cheney presided over the formulation of interrogation techniques that they regard as torture and remains unapologetic for approving water-boarding and other harsh methods used.

Mr. Cheney bases his argument on the view that suspected terrorists should be considered prisoners of war and as such, "ought to be held until the end of the conflict”.

He also criticized the Obama administration for failing to think through its plans to scuttle Guantanamo.

"Obama made a mistake, issuing an order that he wants it closed within a year, but didn't have a clue as to how to proceed," Mr. Cheney said. "And now they're having trouble because they have to come up with a plan of some kind."

The former vice president said that the Guantanamo Bay prison is "a fine facility" and that the White House will have a "very difficult" time closing it, because of the legal, political, and diplomatic challenges associated with indefinite detention.

Mr. Obama has indicated that even after the Guantanamo closure, the government will still have to hold some detainees in prolonged detention. Obama has also restarted the military commission’s process to try some detainees there, instead of in civilian courts, following the Bush policy.

In arguing for the continued use of Guantanamo, Mr. Cheney cited recent press reports that said the majority of the more than 500 prisoners released from Guantanamo have or will return in some capacity to what he called that jihad business.

Mr. Obama's decision to close Guantanamo, however, was of course praised by Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu during a visit to Washington.

But on the domestic political front, one of the leading contenders for the Republican nomination to run against Mr. Obama in 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney took aim at the president's foreign policy and defense budget cuts.

Mr. Romney characterized Mr. Obama's last two trips abroad as a tour of apology and criticized signs from the White House that they might back off a missile defense system in Eastern Europe. "Arrogant, delusional tyrants can't be stopped by earnest words and furrowed brows," Mr. Romney said. "Action, strong bold action coming from a position of strength and determination, is the only effective deterrent."

North Korea and Iran were two of the topics that Mr. Cheney admitted the Bush administration did fall short on. We didn't bat 1,000. No question about it. And Iran and North Korea are still out there, Mr. Cheney said in response to a question about the growth of nuclear programs in both regimes during the eight years that Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were in office. I wish we could have done more, but those are problems that are passed on to the next administration.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Reminiscent of General Pershing in the Philippines who understood the Muslim mind, lining them up, and gunning them down, is the only real deterrent to Islamic Jihad in the West.

The Sunni Wahhabist Muslim mind understands nothing except violence, whether it is violence against you, or violence against them. Benevolence is weakness and justice is blind, in the literal sense.

The Western mind is grossly deceived because of our benevolent fair-minded culture. This is what Western Europe struggled with between 800 and 1100 AD. For 300 years Western Europe mistakenly thought they could eventually redirect the Muslim culture to align with their own.

The U.S. has actually been at war with Islam for more than 200 years. Since 1783 our trade ships were pirated in the Mediterranean. The first American war with Islam was the Barbary War (1801–1805), also known as the Barbary Coast War or the war of Tripoli, it was the first war fought between the United States and the Nation of Islam

The Western Europeans had learned something in the three hundred years of Muslim infiltration that may take another 74 years for the modern Western culture to discover. And that is that Islam will never assimilate into another culture. You my friend will assimilate into theirs.

This is why the Crusades of 11th century are now considered so brutal against Islam. They understood something we don’t yet understand, the only way to stop a brutal nation bent on your total destruction is to destroy the brutal Nation. This is why fire fighters sometimes start a fire at the edge of town in order to stop an oncoming fire from consuming the town. We must fight brutality with brutality. It is truly the only thing Islam understands.

For 226 years Islam has been attacking America, and they will not stop, unless they are stopped.

The Nation of Islam is not compatible with any other culture on the planet. This is because they believe that they are the only culture on the planet. All others must be destroyed or absorbed into the Muslim culture.

Will it take the West another 74 years to recognize this?

V.P. Dick Cheney may not know how right he is: "If you're going to be engaged in a world conflict such as we are, such as the global war on terrorism, if you don't have a place where you can hold these people, your only other option is to kill them…"

The fact that --- “…we don't operate that way,” just may lead to our demise…

de Andréa

Israel May Face Armageddon Alone

Ever wonder why America, the great country from the west is not mentioned in the Bible in conjunction with Armageddon the great war of Israel?
Maybe this is why…

By de Andréa

One of my contacts at the Jerusalem post, Caroline Glick, deputy editor and also an op-ed writer, brings alarming news. As an expert on Arab-Israeli relations with excellent sources deep inside Netanyahu's government, she reports that CIA chief Leon Panetta, a puppet of Obama’s, recently traveled to Israel to "read the riot act" to the Israeli government, warning against an attack on Iran.

More ominously, Glick reports (likely from sources high up in the Israeli government) that the Obama administration has all but accepted as irreversible and unavoidable fact that Iran will soon develop nuclear weapons. She writes, "...we have learned that the [Obama] administration has made its peace with Iran's nuclear aspirations. Senior administration officials acknowledge as much in off-record briefings. It is true, they say, that Iran may exploit its future talks with the US to run down the clock before they test a nuclear weapon. But, they add, if that happens, the U.S. will simply have to live with a nuclear-armed mullocracy."

She goes on to write that the Obama administration is desperate to stop Israel from attacking Iran writing that "as far as the [Obama] administration is concerned, if Israel could just leave Iran's nuclear installations alone, Iran would behave itself.” (Bear in mind that al-Obammah the well trained Muslim sleeper terrorist knows that this is a lie). She also notes that American officials would regard any harm to American interests that flowed from an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities as Israel's doing, not Iran's.

Seemingly in classic ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ fashion, the Obama administration is empathizing more with the Iranian leaders who are holding Israel hostage than with the nation that may be wiped off the map if Iran acquires the bomb. Or is it a fulfillment of his Muslim obligation to abandon Israel in her hour of need?

Obama's end-of-the-year deadline for Iranian talks aimed at stopping its progress toward nuclear weapons is just window dressing without the threat of military action. But of course as a Muslim, al-Obama knows this all to well. As Metternich wrote, "diplomacy without force is like music without instruments.” By warning only of possible strengthening of economic sanctions if the talks do not progress, Obama is making an empty threat. The sanctions will likely have no effect because Russia and China will not let the United Nations act as it must if it is to deter Iranian nuclear weapons.

All this means is that Israel's life is in danger. If Iran gets the bomb, it will use it to kill six million more Jews. No threat of retaliation will make the slightest difference. One cannot deter a suicide bomber with the threat of death. Nor can one deter a theocracy bent on meriting admission to heaven and its perversion of 70 virgins by one glorious act of violence. Iran would probably not launch the bomb itself, anyway, but would give it to its puppet terrorists to send to Israel so it could deny responsibility.

Obama, bent on the fulfillment of Islamic prophecy, would not retaliate with nuclear weapons. And Israel will face Armageddon alone.

The sunshine Jewish patriots who voted for Obama must realize that we are now witnessing the possible Armageddon of Israel. And while that may be the way it is supposed to be as God steps in to annihilate its enemy’s, America will be charged with its abandonment. . We are in the same moral position as the Jews were as they watched Hitler’s rise but did nothing to pressure their favorite liberal Democratic, president, FDR, to take any real action to save them or even to let Jewish refugees into the country. If we remain complacent, we will have the same anguish at watching the destruction of Israel that our parents had in witnessing the Holocaust.

Because one thing is increasingly clear: al-Barrack Hussein Obammah, who has bowed in submission to the king of Islam, is not about to lift a finger to stop Iran from developing the bomb. Obama may have held the first White House Seder, but he certainly is not planning to spend the next couple of years in Jerusalem.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is time people, to take off the blinders of social political correctness and connect all the dots. For years I have been wondering why Islam from the east, and Russia (the great country from the north) were mentioned in the bible as attempting genocide on Israel but nowhere is it mentioned that America (the great country from the west) will defend them.

Now I know that America will not only abandon Israel, but will pave the way for her annihilation.

More importantly I know why…

de Andréa

The U.S. Military Burns Christian Bibles

No Freedom of Religion in the U.S. Military. That is unless you are an Atheist or a Muslim.

By de Andréa

An Obama Administration Pentagon spokesman has just acknowledged seizing and burning the privately owned Bibles of American soldiers serving in Afghanistan.

The Bibles had been printed in the local Pashto and Dari languages, and sent by private donors last year to American Christian soldiers and chaplains, for distribution to American troops on overseas military bases during optionally-attended Christian worship services. Had the Bibles not been recently seized and destroyed, they could have legally been given as gifts during off-duty time to Afghani citizens who welcome our troops in their homes, as an expression of American gratitude for Afghani hospitality, promoting the democratic ideals of freedom of religion and freedom of the press. But I guess that no longer really doesn’t exists in the U.S. military, or maybe not even in the U.S.

The Muslim controlled Al Jazeera television network obtained video footage of the Bibles, held by American soldiers while listening to a chaplain on the Bagram Air Base (inside the base chapel) whose sermon encouraged outreach and personal evangelism. The American values of freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of Christian speech offended some terrorist groups, and angered a small group of American atheists, who demanded the chaplain be punished for "proselytizing" because he simply repeated Jesus' words to "Go and make disciples of all nations" in church. (Can you imagine their outrage if we burned the Koran, instead of the Bible?)

IT'S NOT PROSELYTIZING, IT'S EVANGELISM:
Watch the video it proves the chaplain properly explained U.S. Central Command's General Order Number One, which prohibits "proselytizing" (forcing religious conversions by threats or weapons) but fully permits soldiers of any religion to engage in non-threatening "evangelism" (voluntary conversations about their faith) and legally allows giving private gifts, including books, to Afghani citizens during off-duty hours in their unofficial capacity. The Al Jazeera film-maker Brian Hughes also admitted the Bibles could have been useful in helping soldiers learn the Pashto and Dari languages of the Afghan people.

Instead, the privately owned Bibles were confiscated and destroyed. Caving in to pressure from the terrorist and Atheist groups, the U.S. military spokesman Maj. Jennifer Willis told Reuters reporters, "I can now confirm that the Bibles shown on Al Jazeera's clip were, in fact, collected by the chaplains and later destroyed. They were never distributed." When questioned about the authenticity of the Al Jazeera video, U.S. Army Colonel Greg Julian admitted the Al Jazeera reporting was biased against the American Christians: "Most of this is taken out of context ... this is irresponsible and inappropriate journalism."

The difference then and now
GENERAL DOUGLAS MACARTHUR ENCOURAGED EVANGELISM
After World War II, in order to carry out the democratization of Japan, Five-Star General Of The Army Douglas MacArthur brought Christian leaders to the country to meet with Emperor Hirohito and encouraged mass distribution of Bibles to the population. MacArthur later stated to a visiting American churchman, "We must have ten thousand Christian missionaries and a million Bibles to complete the occupation of this land."

(Source: Rodger R. Venzke, Confidence In Battle - Inspiration In Peace, 1977, p.24-25.)

But today, instead of confronting Muslim and Atheist enemies of religious liberty, Our Muslim President al- Barrack Hussein Obammah who deceptively claims to be a Christian, had his Four-Star Admiral Chairman Of The Joint Chiefs Mike Mullen now appearing to defend the destruction of the soldiers' privately owned Bibles, stating during a Pentagon briefing that the military's position is that it will never "push any specific religion." He did not address the possibility that by seizing and burning privately owned Bibles, the Obama Administration is now enforcing the state religion of atheism and or Islam upon our troops.

ATHEISTS JOIN MUSLIM TERRORISTS AGAINST LIBERTY
Aggressive anti-Christian secularist Mikey Weinstein immediately demanded the chaplain in the video be court-martialed for encouraging voluntary evangelism in church, despite the Pentagon's claim that same chaplain somehow assisted in confiscating the Bibles.

COURT-MARTIAL THE ARMY CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS
The favorite new ploy of Mikey Weinstein's anti-Christian group (Military Religious Freedom Foundation) is to frighten troops into silence by "demanding the court-martial" of any soldier or chaplain who talks publicly about his or her faith. For example, incredibly, Weinstein recently demanded the Army court-martial their Chief of Chaplains Major General Douglas Carver, because Chaplain Carver issued a proclamation calling for a day of prayer and fasting for our troops.

The Chief of Chaplains' proclamation called for voluntary prayer by chaplains of all diverse faiths to act "in keeping with your religious traditions," and support our troops who face difficult traumas, pressures, and temptations toward suicide. Carver consulted with two senior Jewish chaplains before issuing the proclamation.

But Mikey Weinstein claims that no chaplain can encourage prayer or Bible reading without violating what he pretends is a Constitutional mandate separating church from state. (To save my life, I can not find that part of the constitution, ‘anywhere’.) "These insightful actions are grossly offensive not only to Muslims in Afghanistan and across the world, but to all those who hold faith in the U.S. Constitution," said Weinstein of the troops' Bibles. (Weinstein must possess a very special version of the constitution, it may be one of those rare ‘one of a kind anti-American Atheist/Muslim copies that are now beginning to surface)

Ironically Weinstein's own web-site contains pictures of atheist soldiers, soliciting donations for Weinstein while wearing their full dress uniform, without any apparent legal disclaimer that their anti=American/anti-Christian views do not represent the views of the U.S. military.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I have to ask the obvious question, which is: What can one expect from a Muslim President???

It starts with the probation of Christian expression then the ‘burning of Bibles’, then Court Martials, then imprisonment, then beheading…

When are we going to express our outrage???

Jesus said about this situation: …”And let him who has no sword sell his mantle and buy one.’ Luke 22:36b RSV.

Maybe we should take Jesus seriously…

What do you think?

de Andréa

Terrorist Paid To Come to America

Did you know that your tax dollars are going to support the migration of terrorists to the U.S.? Whether you are an Obama fan, or not, you need to know this....

By de Andréa
May 8, 2009

H.R. 1388 was passed behind our backs. You may want to read about it. It wasn't mentioned on the news; it was just on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN screen.

Your President al- Barrack Hussein Obammah has just given more than $20 Million of your dollars to immigrate terrorist Hamas degenerates to the USA. This is the news that didn't make the liberal indoctrination headlines...

By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the so-called Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza. Would you believe it, now, not only, are the terrorists not terrorists or even “man made disasters’ according to Home Land in-Security, but now they are “Victims”. Somebody ought to inform our Muslim leader that WE ARE THE VICTIMS… and not the terrorists.

The "presidential determination", which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Hamas terrorists to resettle here in the United States, was signed by ‘al-Barrack’ on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4.

Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (The Hamas terrorist organization) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

Your President is a Muslim Sleeper Terrorist that is going to “CHANGE” America into a Muslim State if we don’t wake up from this deception.

You don’t believe it???

Let's review an itemized list of just a very few of Barack Obama's most recent actions since his majestic coronation: If you are deceived, you probably didn’t hear about any of these either.

His first call to any head of state, as president, was to Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Fatah party (a subordinate terrorist organization to Hamas) in the Terrorists Islamic territory of Gaza.

His first one-on-one television interview with any news organization was with Al Arabia television.His first executive order was to fund/facilitate abortion(s) on demand not just here within the U. S., but within the entire world, using your U. S. tax payer dollars to accomplish this. Why did he do this when abortion is against Muslim Sharia law? Well guess what my friend --- abortions of Infidels are encouraged; you see it creates a no population growth among the non Muslim Kaffaar. Watch a video about Muslim Demographics

He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of detainees halted.

He ordered overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.

He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and the "terror attack" on 9/11 which killed more than three thousand American infidels

Now we learn that he is assisting hundreds of thousands of Hamas terrorists to move, and live in, the US at American taxpayer expense. Terrorists are going to live right next door to you.

These important, and insightful, issues are being "lost" in the blinding bail-outs and "stimulation" packages.

Just when are we going to wake up and get our heads out of the sand and recognize the truth, which is that al-Barack Hussein Obammah in not only our first black president, but our first Muslim Communist president, and is a sleeper terrorist Muslim who is bent on turning America into the first Western Islamic Nation.

You still don’t believe it? I really don’t blame you, it is so unbelievable. If you haven’t already read it…Read Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27, 2009 for yourself.

I really, really don’t make this stuff up. I don’t have to, truth is really more bazaar than fiction

If you don’t see this, then I am afraid that you are among the deceived my friend...

de Andréa

Obama Turning Terrorists Loose In U.S.

If al-Barrack Hussein Obammah had his way he would turn all the Guantanamo terrorists loose in your neighborhoods.
A CALL TO ACTION

By de Andréa
May 20, 2009

Why would Obama do this? Because that is what Muslims do. He is bound by his Islamic religion to carry out the jihad on all the infidel nations of the world. And since he is the dictator of America he will start with this nation.

Oh! You don’t think he’ll do this? Well I have news for you my friend he is in the process of doing just THIS as I write this article. Moreover he will CARRY THIS OUT unless congress stops him.

Obama may release two terrorists from Gitmo --- Fox News reported it yesterday morning at 8:02 Central Time. According to the breaking news, the Obama administration is considering releasing two Chinese Muslim Uighur militants into the United States immediately. These are radicals that have been trained by al Qaeda.

This is NOT a transfer to another prison, but a release on American soil. The Fox News reporter stated that this report of an imminent release had not yet been confirmed by the Obama administration, so by the time you read this article there will likely be more updated news on this fiasco.

Regardless of how this particular story ultimately plays out, it is clear to me that Washington needs to hear our voice – your voice – to ensure that no Guantanamo terrorist is released or transferred into the United States.

These detainees will be released on American soil – and they will be provided with tax-paid public assistance benefits!!

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!

If you want to make your voice heard! Click here to sign a petition put out by Brigitte Gabriel and the ACT organization opposing the release or transfer of any Gitmo terrorist.

Would you like for example to have any of these men living in your community and near your family? Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, who al Qaeda’s military commander called a “highly professional jihadist,” how about Wailed Bin Attash, who survived a suicide bombing attack against a U.S. embassy in Africa, or Gouled Hassan Dourad, the leader of the al Qaeda terrorist cell in Djibouti.

With President Obama’s Executive Order closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, the very real possibility exists that ruthless, cold-blooded terrorists like these will be brought to the continental United States. Why? Because they are so dangerous that no other country will take them!! Opposition is building to these proposals, both in Congress and at the grassroots level. I need you to take action TODAY to let our elected officials know that we OPPOSE transferring or releasing any of the Guantanamo detainees into America.

ACTION ITEM #1
Click here to sign a petition to Congress entitled:

“We Oppose the Release of ANY Guantanamo Facility Detainee into the United States and Providing Any Tax-Paid Public Benefits to Any Detainee”

Please sign this petition right away, and then follow the directions at the bottom of the petition to forward it to everyone you know! We need to get as many people as possible to sign this petition right away!

It only takes a few moments to add your name to our petition and then forward it on to your friends and family. They need to know there are plans being discussed in Washington to transfer and even release many of these dangerous enemy combatants on to American soil. Give them the chance to add their voices to yours by forwarding the petition on to them as soon as you have signed it. Lisa Piraneo, ACT’s Director of Government Relations, will then deliver this petition to the appropriate congressional leaders.

ACTION ITEM #2
Contact your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to support both of these bills:
H.R. 2294, the “Keep Terrorists Out of America Act.” This bill would require that no detainee could be released or transferred to a state without the approval of that state’s governor or legislature.

H.R. 2338, the “No Welfare for Terrorists Act.” This bill would prohibit any Guantanamo detainee released into the United States from receiving any federal, state, or local public benefits.

You can contact your U.S. Representative by phone, fax, or email. Please click here to get contact information for your Representative.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Together we can protect our communities from these enemies of America and put a stop to the absurdity of rewarding terrorism with the doling out of tax-paid public benefits. A petition with tens of thousands of names, and thousands of calls, faxes and emails, will send an unmistakably loud and clear message to Congress. So please ACT today!!

Bad things happen when good men and women do nothing…

de Andréa .

An Update on Gitmo
From Lisa Piraneo
Act for America

GUANTANAMO TERRORISTS COMING TO YOUR COMMUNITY?THE THREAT REMAINS, EVEN AS CONGRESS APPLIES THE BRAKES.

By Lisa Piraneo,
Director of Government Relations
Act for America

Dear de Andrea,

As you know, the goings-on in Congress can be very complicated, and therefore confusing -- perhaps deliberately so. The recent actions by the U.S. House and Senate with regard to the issue of closing the Guantanamo detention facility (and what to do with the 240 terrorists it currently holds) are an example of how a small legislative victory sometimes can be confused with an overall policy change. It is also an example of the tremendous power of grassroots, and how the American public has once again forced its elected officials to listen.

Over the last two weeks, the U.S. House and Senate considered the 2009 Supplemental Appropriations bill. This particular piece of legislation provides “supplemental” funding to a variety of issue-specific projects focusing primarily on Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Pandemic Flu. The bill also was being used as vehicle to fund the President’s plan (and campaign promise) to close the Guantanamo detention facility within one year of his presidency – a plan which possibly included the transfer of some of the 240 terrorist detainees to the United States. Both the House and Senate versions of this appropriations bill initially contained $80 million to be put toward the Guantanamo closure effort.

However, the American people spoke, and Congress got the message – loud and clear. After their constituents let them know, “WE DON’T WANT TERRORISTS IN OUR COMMUNITY” the House and Senate both stripped the $80 million from their versions of the legislation. Congress has informed the Administration that, until it sees a concrete plan for the closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, it will receive no funding to do so.

This action is certainly a victory, but it is by no means the end of the story. There has been no reversal on the decision to close Guantanamo – and there has been no policy reversal by either Congress or the Administration on the possibility of the Guantanamo detainees coming to the U.S. Earlier this week, FBI director Robert Mueller informed the House Judiciary Committee that bringing the detainees into our country would be a risky move, even if they were to be housed in maximum security prisons. "The concerns we have about individuals who may support terrorism being in the United States run from concerns about providing financing, radicalizing others," Mueller said, as well as "the potential for individuals undertaking attacks in the United States."

Congress now waits for the Administration to submit a plan for closing the detention facility. As such a plan is created, it is critical that the American people continue to make their voices heard on this matter. This is simply too important an issue.

Let your voice be heard by taking a brief moment to sign our petition to Congress entitled, “We Oppose the Release of ANY Guantanamo Facility Detainee into the United States and Providing Any Tax-Paid Public Benefits to Any Detainee.” Let Congress know that if and when the Administration does present a plan regarding the closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, it should not include the transfer of ANY Guantanamo terrorist to U.S. soil. If we are successful on this effort, the chances of Guantanamo closing also become quite remote.

Click here to sign.
If America raises her voice as she did over the last two weeks on this critical issue, Congress will listen.

Sincerely,
Lisa PiraneoDirector of Public RelationsACT! for America -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACT for America P.O. Box 12765 Pensacola, FL 32591 www.actforamerica.org
ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Where Were You Born Obama?

As I have said, this is not going away. Not at least until al-Barrack Hussein Obammah answers the question that more than half of the Nation is now asking. Where is the birth certificate?

By de Andréa

One of the many reasons I know that this is not going away is this question is now going up on billboards all over the country. If Obama pays no attention to the ‘Constitution’ or the ‘People’, maybe he will get the idea that he must do something about this nagging dilemma when he sees it on billboards all over the beltway.

A national fund-raising campaign to erect billboards all over the country, questioning Barack Obama's eligibility for office is going on right now at WorldNetDaily "One thing I can say for certain after Day 1 of this campaign – billboards will soon be going up around the country," said Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of the company and the man who came up with the idea.

More than $10,000 has been raised thus far from many hundreds of donors – more than enough to begin putting up the first billboards like the one pictured.

Farah said ”the campaign was born of frustration with timid elected officials in Washington, corrupt judges around the country and a news media that show a stunning lack of curiosity about the most basic facts of Obama's background – especially how it relates to constitutional eligibility for the highest office in the land.”

"As Obama transforms this country from a self-governing constitutional republic to one governed by a central ruling elite, the simple fact remains that no controlling legal authority has established that he is indeed a 'natural born citizen' as the Constitution requires," Farah said. "Obama's promise of transparency has become a bad joke as he continues to hide simple, innocuous documents like his birth certificate and his student records. It may be unusual for a news agency to launch such a campaign, but we live in very unusual times." said Farah.

The purpose of the billboard campaign is to make sure Obama cannot avoid this question any longer. Billboard space is currently being negotiated in Los Angeles, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Sacramento, San Francisco New York, New Jersey, Des Moines, Seattle and other metro areas. And you can bet your stars and stripes that when one of these goes up in the middle of town, it will be on the 6 0'clock news.

The founding fathers built special protections into the Constitution to protect a free people from the tyranny that we are experiencing today. The First Amendment, thank God is there so I can tell you the truth without being arrested, at least not yet anyway.

The reason they did that is because they understood a vibrant 'Fourth Estate' was necessary as an independent watchdog on government. Moreover it is in that tradition that WorldNetDaily says they are assuming this role – “since nobody else in the press will do it" said Farah.

If you would like to participate in this campaign to possibly free America from the ‘Socialistic Tyranny’ that we are facing, then go to the special WND site below and become involved.

Donations are being accepted to defray the costs of a national billboard campaign with the simple message: "Where's the birth certificate?"

THE BOTTOM LINE: It's time to raise the visibility of this issue vital to the rule of law in America and it appears that World Net Daily News has the guts to take this on.

If you want to read any one of hundreds of past articles on the subject of Obama’s eligibility written by World Net Daily News Click on this:

We Shall Overcome…

de Andréa

“America Had Better Wake Up”

Although there is some controversy over just who was the original author of this piece, either Pam Geller or Tim Woods; the message it brings certainly reflects my own and is well worth reading.

de Andréa

See Books Authored by Tim Woods Here

You can access Pamela Geller’s website Here it is well worth checking out.

Found on the ‘American Conservative Daily’ web sight

“America Had Better Wake UP”
Quote “I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied history all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes, these exist but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about 10 - 15 years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demanded and then codified into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people whom we knew could never pay back? Why? We learned recently that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September.

Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of "We the People," who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, and school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, and Social Security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about.) The list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x10. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more important.)

Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change...radical change. Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now. This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning.
I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully them into submission.

And then he was duly elected to office, [well not actually] with a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world. [Ring any bells?]

He did it with a compliant media - Did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and... “Change”. And the people surely got what they voted for. (Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.) Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.

Don't forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years - a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency - it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All, with the best of intentions of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong, close my eyes, have another latte and ignore what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me; others laugh or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe - and why I believe it. I pray I am wrong. But, I do not think I am”. Unquote
***********************************************

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is interesting at times to discover that there are others in this universe that have a similar or in some cases a nearly identical philosophy as my own. If you are a regular reader of mine you will recognize this understanding of history and politics.

In the final paragraph as the author reflects on a personal note, I have to say that I also mirror that thought. And I also pray that I am wrong. But regrettably, I do not think I am

de Andréa

Are You A Right Wing Extremist?

If you are anything but a liberal left wing socialist, then you have been identified by the Obama administration as a right wing extremist domestic terrorist and therefore an enemy of the State.

By de Andréa

Do you know your history? Just as in the 1920 and 30’s if you were among those that recognized what was really in store for Germany, you were associated with radical groups. In those times, the savior and messiah was a former smooth-talking rabble-rousing paper hanger from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom he disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises of “Change”. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully them into submission. No this was not about al-Obama, this was al-Hitler.

Is this attack on ‘Conservative Americans’ who just want to return to a constitutionally free, and moral society, a precursor to the same warmed over philosophy and ideology that Hitler discovered in a book called the Quran in the late 1800’s?

The Department of Homeland Security officials have issued a report which links people with pro-life, anti-illegal immigration views, teachers of end-time prophecies, and veterans of war with "right-wing extremist" groups that are organizing to overthrow the government.

And if you have a bumper sticker like the Patriotic flag pictured, then the State Police have been ordered by the "SS" or the DHS to stop and detain you to do a criminal background check and warn you to remove that subversive sticker from your automobile. Read the story.

Is this paranoia on the part of this administration, or is this as Hitler did, a well orchestrated plot to demonize the true freedom loving Americans and identify them as enemies of the State?

In an intelligence assessment issued to law enforcement recently, Homeland Security officials said there was no specific information about an attack in the works by right-wing extremists. But the agency warns that an extended economic downturn with real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit could foster an environment for extremists to recruit members who may not have been supportive of these causes in the past.

The latest assessment by the “SS” or rather the DHS started making its way into the mainstream press after conservative blogs like mine got wind of the analysis. In the unclassified report -- "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" -- the"SS" 0r DHS agency warns that imposing new restrictions on firearms and returning military veterans who have difficulties assimilating back into their communities could lead to terror groups or individuals attempting to carry out attacks. The returning war veterans have skills and experience that are appealing to right-wing groups looking to carry out an attack, according to the report.

I can’t help but think what paranoia and demonizing the British Crown was trying to spread among the colonies in the mid 1700’s regarding those that had adopted the philosophy of liberty.

Will these degenerate conservative extremists that are philosophical descendants of the freedom loving American Colonists actually rise up and bear arms to secure their freedom? I mean would they really do what the framers specifically and purposely wrote into the constitution as a means to secure and maintain a “Free State”?

The report says right-wing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily "hate-oriented" and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority or rejecting the governments’ authority entirely.

According to the Homeland Security document, right-wing extremism "may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as abortion or immigration."

The report goes on to say that "many right-wing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use."

The Homeland Security report also makes reference to the rise of right-wing extremism in the 1990s and says factors which enhanced the movement were opposition to things such as abortion and same-sex "marriage."

It also says "antigovernment conspiracy theories and 'end times' prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Oh, oh! “My cover has been blown”;” I have been made” as they say. So what is your moral and political ideology? Do you believe in the American law of legal immigration? Do you believe that children have a right to live? Do you believe that crime is caused by people not guns? Do you believe in marriage between a man and a woman? Do you believe in the ‘American Constitution’? Do you believe in the pursuit of happiness? Do you believe that you as a human being have God given rights as the American Declaration documents? Do you actually believe in God?

If you answered yes to any one of these questions, then you my friend, have been identified as a domestic terrorist, and are the enemy of Hitler’s…I’m sorry, Obama’s oppressive regime.

So if I rudely interrupted your latte, then let me apologize, on second thought no I won’t. But please go back to sleep and enjoy what little you have left of freedom. And oh… please explain to your kids for me, that you were just a bit to busy with living your life to try to do what you could to preserve freedom for them.

Enjoy your nap…

de Andréa

Read related articles:
New Enemy of the State

A Declaration of War

Has the Tyranny of America Begun?

Obama Says, Get Rid of Jesus Christ

Despite all the tap-dancing and excuses the Obama stooges gave for removing or covering every bit of Christian symbolic references at Georgetown, the status of his religious ideology can no longer remain a mystery. Connect the dots……………………………………………..

By de Andréa

As if in robotic iteration of the Notre Dame cover up, and or removal of Christian symbols, the Obama teem has done it again, better get use to it.

A more than interesting behavior for someone who said that he “is a Christian”, of course he has also said that he is “proud of his Muslim faith”.

So what is the status of Obama’s ‘Religious Ideology’? Let me ask you this: What kind of fruit grows on a fig tree?

If al-Obama totally had his way, he would cover, remove, or destroy every reference to Jesus Christ on the Planet. Why is this you might ask?

Obama was born to a ‘Communist Muslim Family’, he was indoctrinated into the Muslim faith as a child, in his teen years he was indoctrinated into ‘Social Communism’ by his Grandfather (his Mothers father) and at twenty years of age he went to Pakistan to study under the Islamic Madrassas, only to return to America to attend a left wing socialist University, and he spent twenty years under the tutelage of the ‘Black Muslim’ Pastor Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan who calls al-Obammah the “Messiah of Islam”. Then the icing on the cake, as ‘President of the United States’ he bows down in complete submission to the Saudi King: Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz, the King of Islam, and now he is removing or covering up every reference to Jesus Christ everywhere he goes.

As I asked: what kind of fruit grows on a fig tree. The Bible says it this way. “…train up a child in the way you want him to go and when he is old he will not depart from it” Paraphrased.

Obama had a monogram that symbolizes the name of Jesus hidden from the backdrop of a speech he gave at Georgetown University last Tuesday.

The letters IHS are an ancient monogram for the name of Jesus Christ, according to the online Catholic Encyclopedia. They stand on a wooden archway above the dais where Obama gave his speech.

“The White House requested that all university signs and Christian symbols behind the stage be concealed or removed”, said Julie Bataille, spokeswoman for the Jesuit-founded school in Washington, D.C.

The Catholic University of America, also in Washington, might have handled the situation differently. "I can’t imagine, the bishops’ at the university and the national university of the Catholic Church that we would ever cover up our religious art or signage for any reason” Catholic University spokesman Victor Nakas told The Times,

“Our Catholic faith is integral to our identity as an institution of higher education,” he said.

But the Rev. Thomas Reese, a senior fellow at Georgetown, advanced a more warm fuzzy relaxed approach. “It is more for camera quality than anything else," he told The Times. "They don't want distractions that would make the eye wander. I don't think this is motivated by theology, but by communications strategy." God is a distration at a so-called Christian college.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The Reverend Thomas Reese may just be onto something, about strategy I mean. One must understand that Georgetown ‘U’ has accepted millions of American dollars, not from American philanthropists, but from the Saudi King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz. Yes -- the same Muslim King that al-Barrack Hussein Obammah bowed and submitted the entire Citizenry of America to, at the G-5 summit. You see, King Abdullah paid for Barrack’s education. Nice of Uncle King Abdullah wasn’t it?

How’s that for connecting the dots?

Need I say more???

de Andréa

Police and Child Protection Services Ignore Child Abuse at a U.S. Mosque

Counter-terror researcher says police and CPS fear Islamic lobby groups

By de Andréa

Islam will run this country before we even recognize it is happening.

Maybe it already is…

A counter-terrorism expert researching extremism at U.S. mosques says authorities in Nashville, Tenn., ignored his report of child abuse by teachers at a local mosque due to fear of retribution from Muslim organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Dave Gaubatz, a former Air Force Special Intelligence Agent, said that he informed the local prosecutor, the FBI and Sgt. Brooks Harris of the Metropolitan Police Department in Nashville of a 7-year-old girl who said, teachers at the Al-Farooq mosque "hit the children" during Shariah law, lessons and that's not all.

Sgt. Harris insists he was not initially given enough information to pursue the case and denies he said anything about fearing the Council on American-Islamic Relations – CAIR – or any other Islamic groups.

While Harris says that he didn’t have enough information to pursue the case, he was listening to an audio recording of the child’s claim. I wonder just what Sgt Harris thinks he needs to look into allegations of abuse of a 7 year old. If this is S.O.P., maybe this is why there is so much child abuse in America, the police just don’t pursue the crime, especially if there is politics involved. Maybe his doughnut break was interrupted or possibly what Dave Gaubatz suspects is true, “The police are afraid of the Muslims.”

If you would like to listen to the audio, please CLICK HERE.

Gaubatz stands by his claims and insists he gave Harris all of the necessary information to pursue the allegation in March. Gaubatz posted information on his blog . On the recording, the Seven year old girl mentions her "husband" and says her legs hurt from the beatings. Gaubatz said other mosque attendees confirmed that worshippers practiced pedophilia. This is of course considered acceptable under Islamic Shariah Law. Their Prophet Muhammad was in fact a pedophile.

Gaubatz set out last month on a "counter-terrorism tour" across America in which he planned to visit a mosque in each state in 50 days to assess their threat to the nation's security.

Gaubatz said his female researcher, a Middle Eastern woman working undercover, who had been going to the Nashville mosque several times a day for classes and lectures, informed him of the child's abuse claim March 9. The child said the Islamic teachers were hitting the students.

Listen to a recording of the child's claim of abuse, courtesy of Pamela Geller's Atlas Shrugs blog:

Harris said the abuse report had also been filed with the Department of Children's Services. But Gaubatz said that when he inquired last Wednesday at DCS, he was told the agency had no record of anyone from the Nashville Police Department filing such a report.

Harris later admitted that he did not pass Gaubatz' information to DCS. But said he did forward it to the police department's Youth Services commander, who gave it to the DCS. He also said that he requested more data from Gaubatz, which was not provided until after Gaubatz went public with his information through his blog.

It seems, the police investigators no longer investigate they just sit around drinking coffee and eating chocolate éclairs and expect private citizens to supply them with all the evidence needed to bring the case to court, convict, and sentence.

Gaubatz said that on April 11 the female researcher filed a report with the Department of Children's Services. The colleague received a reply from DCS saying the report "will not result in an assessment or investigation" because it "does not provide information necessary to locate the family." I looks to me as if we need protection from the protection agency…Need I say more???

Harris contended that it was only last week, more than a month after Gaubatz' first communication, that he received "descriptive information that should help the appropriate investigator(s) from DCS to identify and interview the victim."

Gaubatz Says, that "from day one" in a sworn affidavit of his correspondence, that he provided Harris with the location of the mosque, the name of the child, phone numbers and details of the family. "I was concerned for the children, because I understand Shariah law and know many Somalis follow Shariah very closely, and 'child marriages' are common in Somalia and Saudi Arabia," Gaubatz said. Now they are common as well as excepted in America.

Gaubatz also said that in February he witnessed an incident at the Al-Farooq mosque in which abuse may have occurred, although he did not actually see the violence. He heard a male teacher screaming in Arabic, followed by the yell of a female child. When he turned, he saw the teacher standing over the crying child, who he estimated was between 8 and 10 years old. The teacher was carrying a stick about one foot long, he says.
While he did not see any physical contact, "from the reactions of the other children, I believe this happened," he said.

Gaubatz also reported that radical Islamic literature and audio tapes were present in the mosque library.

"I saw children being taught in the library of Al-Farooq," he said, noting they were "surrounded by material teaching violence" from well-known Islamic ‘Terrorist Madrassas’ such as Ali Al Timimi and Sayid Abul Maududi.

Maududi is the founder of the radical Pakistani party Jamaat-e-Islami a break off of the Mushahadeen --Terrorist group. . Al Timimi, according to federal prosecutors, was the spiritual leader of the Virginia Jihad Network, who encouraged members to wage jihad in the U.S. and India.

Gaubatz said his researcher was shown by members of the mosque where to get similar materials.

"My female researcher was escorted by an Al-Farooq worshipper to a Somali store 'hidden' in a section of Nashville that could only be located if taken there. The worshipper informed my researcher the 'store' had moved because of 'government problems,'" Gaubatz wrote on his blog.

Gaubatz said "bootleg" copies of Islamic lectures and films were provided at the store. The researcher also said the store was involved in illegal financial transactions such as sending money from the U.S. to Somali terrorist organizations and other locations.

Harris said he asked Gaubatz for further proof that extremism was being preached at the mosque, insisting that radical Islamic literature was not illegal and he did not have enough to warrant an investigation.

Gaubatz clarified he never expected Harris or the FBI to conduct an investigation into the mosque having Islamic jihadist material. His primary concern was the abuse claim.

"It is the responsibility of law enforcement and child protective services to investigate child abuse," Gaubatz said. "I gave them everything they needed from minute one."

Referring to the raid on the compound of Warren Jeff's polygamous sect in Texas last year, he said, "If law enforcement can raid a non-Muslim compound and remove 500 women and children from this compound based on an anonymous phone call, should authorities not immediately act if a former federal agent with a Top Secret clearance provided a sworn affidavit and audio of a crying child saying she was beaten?

"Does this child, the parents and the imam of the mosque not deserve at least an interview?” Gaubatz asked. "The idea that Harris and CPS did not have enough info to locate the child or her parents is ridiculous."

Gaubatz also provided excerpts, scanned images, and titles of literature available at the mosque he described as radical Islamic and ordering terrorist Jihad on America.

He reported that one 15-page pamphlet, titled "Warning Against Prohibitions," stated that if you find anyone engaging in homosexual acts "kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done."

A Maududi book available at the mosque, "Call to Jihad," states: "That Jihad is obligatory on all the Muslims does not necessarily mean that all of us should take arms and proceed to the battlefront. Jihad is a very wide term and its connotation is not confined to just the clash of arms only. In fact it denotes the entire war effort which is made to uphold our cause and win victory over the enemy. Out of the many and varied fronts of war, battlefield is just one of them.
Warfare requires total effort and all sections of people, each and every citizen must contribute his share, however humble, to strengthen the capability of those fighting on the front line."

Folks! There are no “Middle of the Road”, “Moderate”, “Warm fuzzy Muslims”. There are only Muslins and you…“The deceived Kaffaar”.

Harris said that based on the evidence provided, and Gaubatz' "refusal to respond to several key follow-up questions" he saw no reason for an investigation by the Nashville Police Specialized Investigations Division. It is interesting to say the least that if the Nashville Police Specialized Investigations Division doesn’t investigate, I just can’t help but wonder just what they actually do. Yes of course, drink coffee and eat police pastry.

He also contended Gaubatz was apparently "backing away from his single most critical assertion," that the mosque was teaching children to kill non-believers.

"I am not backing off of anything I have ever said," Gaubatz replied. "I saw the children in this room with complete unrestricted access to the materials that advocate killing people and implementing the Islamic Ummah (The world Nation of Islam) under Sharia law in the U.S."

Harris emphasized that his department has had "excellent relations with both mosques that [Gaubatz] has targeted."

He noted Wednesday that Al-Farooq had invited him and law enforcement investigators from several agencies to meet with the mosque's board members in the library that afternoon. For coffee and doughnuts no doubt.

Somebody forgot to tell the Nashville Police Dept that the FBI romanced the terrorist organization “The Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) for years, before they recognized that they too had been deceived and finally broke off their relationship with this so-called charitable organization that also has made countless threats against the life of yours truly.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This ignorant response from Sgt. Harris at the Nashville Police Department as well as the CPS is so outrageous telling of the deception of American citizens by the Nation of Islam that it absolutely boggles my mind as it would anyone with an understanding of Islamic studies.

Even though the Nation of Islam has been attacking America continuously for the past 200 plus years, our own president has said that we are not at war with Islam.

I cannot decide from the evidence in this case whether or not the Police are just terrified of the Muslims or if they really believe that they are just a warm and fuzzy bunch. In either case I would think that even if Sgt Harris was correct when he said that agent Gaubatz was lying, about giving him all the information and he didn’t know who the parents were. Something inside me begs to ask the question: isn’t that part of a police investigators job? I mean to Investigate??? You see no matter who said what, or how much or how little evidence there is or was, we still have a little 7 year old girl saying on tape that she was beaten.

But this is the political mindset of our governments our police agencies an obviously even the ‘Child protection Services’, not to make waves when it concerns Islam, because it would be politically incorrect and not very multicultural to even think that Islam “The Peaceful Nation” is anything but warm and fuzzy and yes don’t forget that they are peaceful.

It quite simply doesn’t occur to anyone that NO WHERE IN THE BLOODY WORLD, where there are bloody Muslims, that there is anything but PEACE.

On the contrary, there is BLOOD IN THE BLOODY STREETS.

Just maybe we should READ ‘THEIR’ BLOODY BOOK America!

No, instead, we are giving the enemy of the entire world, OUR CHILDREN AND OUR BLOODY COUNTRY…

I think I am going to take a bath, I feel dirty after writting this peice...

de Andréa

College of Notre Dame Endorses Murder

The Pope should hang his head in shame and beg Gods forgiveness for not severing all connections to ‘The College of Notre Dame’.

By de Andréa

Just as the so-called Christian College of George Town University, the College of Notre Dame is anything but a Christian college.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes was arrested , along with Randall Terry, March 8, 2009 as they march on to the campus of Notre Dame with an anti-abortion group. Read article written by Allen Keys

With the clock ticking until our Muslim President who indorses the murdering of Infidel babies all over the world with your money, gets ready to speak at the University of Notre Dame, Allen Keys, and Randall Terry, protested at the University’s willingness to take their advocacy of evil to a new level of spiritual atrocity,”

Keyes said in a statement. “[T]hey will welcome to the university campus a man who represents the most abominable and extreme commitment ever known in U.S. politics in destroying the God given right to life of innocent human offspring.”

“…I will go to South Bend, says Keys. I will step foot on the Notre Dame campus to lift up the standard that protects the life of the innocent children of this and every generation. I will do it all day and every day from now until the Master comes if need be, though it means I shall be housed every day in the prison house of lies and injustice that Obama, Father Jenkins, and their minions now mean to construct”…

Our President recently said, "we are no longer a Christian nation": He may be right in that he is a Kenyan Muslim and will do his part to clear a path to Islam, beginning with the massacre of all Infidel babies. Kill the Kaffaar!

The following however, are some truly profound quotes from a few of the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence that established America as an independent country, nearly half (24) held seminary or Bible College degrees.

These profound quotes of the Christian founding fathers will give you an overview of their strong moral and spiritual convictions which formed the foundation of our nation and our government. Moreover, it is certainly telling of just how far off track America has gone.

George Washington

1st U.S. President
“While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian.” –The Writings of Washington, pp. 342-343.

John Adams

2nd U.S. President and Signer of the Declaration of Independence
“Suppose a nation in some distant Region should take the Bible for their only law Book, and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited! Every member would be obliged in conscience, to temperance, frugality, and industry; to justice, kindness, and charity towards his fellow men; and to piety, love, and reverence toward Almighty God … What a Eutopia, what a Paradise would this region be.” –Diary and Autobiography of John Adams, Vol. III, p. 9.
“The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.” –Adams wrote this on June 28, 1813, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.
“The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever.” –Adams wrote this in a letter to his wife, Abigail, on July 3, 1776.

Thomas Jefferson

3rd U.S. President, Drafter and Signer of the Declaration of Independence
“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever; That a revolution of the wheel of fortune, a change of situation, is among possible events; that it may become probable by Supernatural influence! The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in that event.” –Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, p. 237.
“I am a real Christian - that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ.” –The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, p. 385.

John Hancock

1st Signer of the Declaration of Independence
“Resistance to tyranny becomes the Christian and social duty of each individual. … Continue steadfast and, with a proper sense of your dependence on God, nobly defend those rights which heaven gave, and no man ought to take from us.” –History of the United States of America, Vol. II, p. 229.

Benjamin Franklin

Signer of the Declaration of Independence and Unites States Constitution
“Here is my Creed. I believe in one God, the Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by His Providence. That He ought to be worshipped.
That the most acceptable service we render to him is in doing good to his other children. That the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental points in all sound religion, and I regard them as you do in whatever sect I meet with them.
As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals and his religion, as he left them to us, is the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity; though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the truth with less trouble. I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that belief has the good consequence, as probably it has, of making his doctrines more respected and more observed; especially as I do not perceive, that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the unbelievers in his government of the world with any peculiar marks of his displeasure.” –Benjamin Franklin wrote this in a letter to Ezra Stiles, President of Yale University on March 9, 1790.

Samuel Adams

Signer of the Declaration of Independence and Father of the American Revolution
“And as it is our duty to extend our wishes to the happiness of the great family of man, I conceive that we cannot better express ourselves than by humbly supplicating the Supreme Ruler of the world that the rod of tyrants may be broken to pieces, and the oppressed made free again; that wars may cease in all the earth, and that the confusions that are and have been among nations may be overruled by promoting and speedily bringing on that holy and happy period when the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ may be everywhere established, and all people everywhere willingly bow to the sceptre of Him who is Prince of Peace.” –As Governor of Massachusetts, Proclamation of a Day of Fast, March 20, 1797.

James Madison

4th U.S. President
“Cursed be all that learning that is contrary to the cross of Christ.” –America’s Providential History, p. 93.

James Monroe

5th U.S. President
“When we view the blessings with which our country has been favored, those which we now enjoy, and the means which we possess of handing them down unimpaired to our latest posterity, our attention is irresistibly drawn to the source from whence they flow. Let us then, unite in offering our most grateful acknowledgements for these blessings to the Divine Author of All Good.” –Monroe made this statement in his 2nd Annual Message to Congress, November 16, 1818.

John Quincy Adams

6th U.S. President
“The hope of a Christian is inseparable from his faith. Whoever believes in the divine inspiration of the Holy Scriptures must hope that the religion of Jesus shall prevail throughout the earth. Never since the foundation of the world have the prospects of mankind been more encouraging to that hope than they appear to be at the present time. And may the associated distribution of the Bible proceed and prosper till the Lord shall have made ‘bare His holy arm in the eyes of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God’ (Isaiah 52:10).” –Life of John Quincy Adams, p. 248.

William Penn

Founder of Pennsylvania
“I do declare to the whole world that we believe the Scriptures to contain a declaration of the mind and will of God in and to those ages in which they were written; being given forth by the Holy Ghost moving in the hearts of holy men of God; that they ought also to be read, believed, and fulfilled in our day; being used for reproof and instruction, that the man of God may be perfect. They are a declaration and testimony of heavenly things themselves, and, as such, we carry a high respect for them. We accept them as the words of God Himself.” –Treatise of the Religion of the Quakers, p. 355.

Roger Sherman

Signer of the Declaration of Independence and United States Constitution
“I believe that there is one only living and true God, existing in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, the same in substance equal in power and glory. That the scriptures of the old and new testaments are a revelation from God, and a complete rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him. That God has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, so as thereby he is not the author or approver of sin. That he creates all things, and preserves and governs all creatures and all their actions, in a manner perfectly consistent with the freedom of will in moral agents, and the usefulness of means. That he made man at first perfectly holy, that the first man sinned, and as he was the public head of his posterity, they all became sinners in consequence of his first transgression, are wholly indisposed to that which is good and inclined to evil, and on account of sin are liable to all the miseries of this life, to death, and to the pains of hell forever.
I believe that God having elected some of mankind to eternal life, did send his own Son to become man, die in the room and stead of sinners and thus to lay a foundation for the offer of pardon and salvation to all mankind, so as all may be saved who are willing to accept the gospel offer: also by his special grace and spirit, to regenerate, sanctify and enable to persevere in holiness, all who shall be saved; and to procure in consequence of their repentance and faith in himself their justification by virtue of his atonement as the only meritorious cause.

I believe a visible church to be a congregation of those who make a credible profession of their faith in Christ, and obedience to him, joined by the bond of the covenant.
I believe that the souls of believers are at their death made perfectly holy, and immediately taken to glory: that at the end of this world there will be a resurrection of the dead, and a final judgment of all mankind, when the righteous shall be publicly acquitted by Christ the Judge and admitted to everlasting life and glory, and the wicked be sentenced to everlasting punishment.” –The Life of Roger Sherman, pp. 272-273.

THE BOTTOM LINE: These quotes are a long way from the demonic ideology and character of the President of America today. Obama who said “I am proud of my Muslim faith” and yet claims to be a Christian; and exactly what is it that supports his claim to Christianity? Is it his sitting in a Chicago ‘Black Muslim’ Church pew, listening to ’Imam Jeremiah Wright’ spew out his ‘Christian hating’, ‘God hating’, ‘America hating’ fatwa-vomit for 20 years?

President al-Barrack Hussein Obammah has, among other things, ordered Father Jenkins of Notre Dame the whore of Catholicism, to remove any references to the Christian faith before he will speak at the university. And just what is he going to speak about that anyone anywhere would come to hear? Is he going to tell his audience of heads full of mush, just how he plans to reduce the population of Infidels through abortion not only here in America but around the world and how he will tax them to death to pay for it?

Probably not…

Watch a video of world Muslim demographics

Watch a video of Obama the Fuhrer of America

Did you know that Hitler’s Nazism was born out of Mohammad’s Islam??? Watch as the American Fuhrer organises the "Youth Citizens Army" One can't help but be reminiscent of Hitlers Youth Camps

de Andréa

de Andréa Is Going To Prison

Yes if California criminal…excuse me, liberal Democrat Linda Sanchez has her way, de Andrea and every other political writer and or blogger on the Net will be arrested for “Hate Crimes” under her bill HR1966


By de Andréa

A new proposal in Congress is threatening fines and jail time for what it calls "cyber- bullying" – communications that includes telephone calls, blogs, e-mails, and texting that could "cause substantial emotional distress."

The vague generalities that are included in H.R. 1966 by California Democrat Linda Sanchez and about a dozen co-sponsors can and will be used to shut down all freedom of expression.

At Wired.com in a report labeled “Threat Level” writer David Kravets criticized the plan to demand "up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress, instead of prison, perhaps we should say gulag," he wrote.

The plan is labeled the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, after the 13-year-old Meier, whose suicide last year reportedly was prompted by a woman who utilized the MySpace social networking site to send the teen critical messages.

The defendant in the case, Lori Drew, was accused under the “Computer Fraud and Abuse Act”. So we already have a law that condemns people who do what the Lori Drew’s of our society do. You see this new law is just a deception to make criminals of us all.

"The Sanchez's bill goes way beyond cyberbullying and comes close to making it a federal offense to even log onto the Internet or use the telephone," Kravets wrote. "The methods of communication where hostile speech is banned include e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages."

"We can't even say what we think of Sanchez's proposal either," he said. "Doing so, would clearly get us two years in solitary confinement."

Wrote a contributor to the Wired Forum page: "If passed, this legislation could be easily abused with the effect of criminalizing all criticism. You probably [couldn't] even criticize the legislation itself because it would cause Sen. Sanchez emotional distress or possibly be considered a form of intimidation."

The bill, which has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, states, "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce or any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."


THE BOTTOM LINE: So I hope that at least a couple of you will come to my trial (if they even give me one) and or come to visit me in the federal penitentiary once in a while, because my electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, and cause substantial emotional distress, and this is one writer that will not stop printing the truth no matter what law is passed or who is distressed about it, including the congress and this Muslim terrorist president. And if that distresses al-Berserk Hussein Obammah then good! Put me in jail, I’ll write on napkins, make paper airplanes out of them, and fly them out onto the streets.

The Congress ignorantly believes that they are the ones that give us our rights and so they also ignorantly believe that they can take them away. This is so telling of the ignorance of our law makers, because if this were true, our rights would be privileges instead, now wouldn’t they.

I answer to a higher authority, think about it…

Speak out now against illegal limits on your right of free speech!

de Andréa

The Profound and Painful Truth

‘The Columbine High School Shootings’

I can’t say that our national leaders did or did not expect to hear this when on the anniversary of the Columbine High School shootings, Darrell Scott, the father of Rachel Scott, a victim of the shootings in Littleton, Colorado, was invited to address the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee...

What he said to our national leaders during this special session of Congress was the most profound and painful truth they had ever heard.

The people of the House Judiciary were not prepared for what he had to say, nor was it well received. But indeed it needed to be said and it needs to be heard by every American, every parent, every teacher, every politician, every sociologist, every psychologist, and every so-called expert, because as you will soon discover, they are wrong, they are all wrong…

These courageous words spoken by Darrell Scott are so profoundly powerful, so penetrating, and so deeply personal, that there is no doubt that God sent this man as a voice crying in the self-indulgent wilderness of the US Congress.

The following is a portion of Darrell Scott’s transcript spoken before the Congress of the United States of America:

de Andrea

To the congress of the United States of America:
"Since the dawn of creation, there has been both good & evil in the hearts of men and women. We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher, and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries out for answers.

The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field. The villain was not the club he used. Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain's heart.

In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA. And I am not a hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA - because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death. Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent.

I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies right here in this room. (Emphasis mine) Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my feelings best... This was written before I knew I would be speaking here today:

Your laws ignore our deepest needs;
Your words are empty air.
You've stripped away our heritage,
You've outlawed simple prayer.

Now gunshots fill our classrooms,
And precious children die.
You seek for answers everywhere,
And ask the question "Why?"

You regulate restrictive laws,
Through legislative creed.
And yet you fail to understand,
That God --- is what we need!

Men and women are three-part beings. We all consist of body, mind, and spirit. When we refuse to acknowledge the third part of our make-up, we create a vacuum that allows evil, prejudice, and hatred to rush in and wreak havoc.

Spiritual presences were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history. Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a historical fact. What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs -- politicians immediately look for a scapegoat such as the NRA... They immediately seek to pass more restrictive laws that contribute to the erosion of our personal and private liberties. We do not need more restrictive laws. The shooters, Eric and Dylan would not have been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our own hearts.

As my son Craig lay under that table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very eyes, he did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to deny him that right! I challenge every young person in America, and around the world, to realize that on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School, prayer was brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate with Him. To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA -- I give to you a sincere challenge. Dare to examine your own heart before casting the first stone!

My daughter's death will not be in vain! The young people of this country will not allow that to happen!"

Darrell Scott,
In memory of Rachel Joy Scott, Columbine High, Littleton Colorado.

Domestic Conservative Terrorists

The war against American patriots continues, only this time it is against a patriotic home schooled teenager.

By de Andréa

No, this is not going away: The classified orders given by Secretary Janet Napolitano, the new Obama ‘enforcer stooge’--- chief of the so-called U.S. Homeland security regime, to begin the war on Christian Conservatives, was actually leaked to the press and wasn’t supposed to be known by the Citizens of America until we began to realize that Christian Constitutional Conservatives were being arrested on trumped up charges, tortured and beaten like what happened to an Arizona Baptist pastor this past week. Please read the story.

If you think that this attack on the Pastor is an isolated case then consider a 16 year old home-schooled teen from North Carolina whose mother hasn’t seen nor heard from him for more than two months.

Yes! He was kidnapped --- yes, by government professional kidnapper's. The government he was so proud of --- enough to drape American flags all over his room. Home-schooled children you see --- are especially dangerous to an emerging dictatorship as we have in America, because homeschool children are not properly indoctrinated (brainwashed) as they should or would be if they were so-called “educated” in an illegal ‘National Government Indoctrinational Institution’ (AKA public school).

No I am not making this up, I have film, watch the video.

A 16-year-old home-schooled boy from North Carolina was taken away from his home in handcuffs more than two months ago and hasn’t been seen or heard from since. He has been held by the FBI in Indiana. A victim, his mother claims, of the Patriot Act and ‘Janet Napolitano’s Homeland Security Gestapo’ that has spun out of control.

According to Mrs. Annette Lundeby of Oxford, N.C., armed FBI agents and local police stormed her home around 10 p.m. earlier this year, looking for her son Ashton. The officers presented a federal search warrant and seized the tenth-grader's computer, cell phone, and bank statements.

16 year old Ashton was then taken to a juvenile facility in South Bend, Ind., charged with making a bomb threat in Indiana from his home computer.

His mother, however, told Raleigh's WRAL TV that she argued with the authorities, claiming someone must have hacked into her son's IP address and used it to make crank calls. The agents' search, she claims, also failed to uncover any trace of bomb-making materials or threatening e-mails

Now you don’t need to be an I.T. or a computer guru to know that IP hacking or any other kind of hacking goes on all the time especially among bomb making terrorists. Funny thing about bomb making terrorists, they usually have bomb making information, bomb making materials and maybe, just maybe --- even a bomb?

"Undoubtedly, they were given false information,"Mrs. Lundeby said, "or they wouldn’t have had 12 agents in the house of a widow, two children, and three cats."

Note: I think she forgot to say a terrorist widow, two terrorist children, and three terrorist cats. Oh well, an ignorant oversight, she’ll catch on….

Allowed no access to see her son over the last two months, facing a court date that keeps being pushed back and given no information by FBI agents sitting behind a gag order on the case, Mrs. Lundeby now says the USA Patriot Act has unjustly imprisoned an innocent boy and stripped her son of due process. I’ll let you in on a little secret Mrs. Lundeby, you don’t know the half of what he has been stripped of.

"We have no rights under the Patriot Act to even defend them, because the Patriot Act basically supersedes the Constitution," she told WRAL-TV. "It wasn't intended to drag your barely 16-year-old, 120-pound son out in the middle of the night on a charge that we can't even defend." This may be true, but that was under the ‘Bush Administration’. This my friend, is the new and improved “Amerika with a K” If you voted for change, you got “Change”

Passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the USA Uniting, and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism – the P.A.T.R.I.O.T ACT, armed law enforcement with new tools to detect and prevent terrorism. Among other measures, it better enables interagency cooperation and allows law enforcement a wider array of technological and surveillance tools to more quickly and stealthily investigate terrorist threats.

"They're saying that 'we feel this individual is a terrorist or an enemy combatant against the United States, and we're going to suspend all of those due process rights because this person is an enemy of the United States,” said Dan Boyce a former U.S. attorney.

Boyce theorized that if an FBI agent came to the conclusion, mistaken or otherwise, that Lundeby was a serious terrorist threat; the usual rules of law enforcement simply don't apply. . "All those normal constitutional rights are simply suspended in thin air.” Just like in the RICO statute as it applies to racketeering.

Ashton's mother told the television news, "Never in my worst nightmare did I ever think that it would be my own government that I would have to protect my children from. This is the United States, and I feel like I live in a third world country now.” Mrs. Lundeby will soon discover that it is even worse than her worst nightmare, much worse. She now lives in the most powerful autocracy in the world.

The WRAL-TV news report, including Mrs. Annette Lundeby's comments, can be seen in a video. Watch a news report video

THE BOTTOM LINE: According to the new ‘Homeland Gestapo leader’ Janet Napolitano, home-schoolers, anti-Abortionists, anti Gay-Marriage, anti-illegal alien Constitutionalists, and patriotic free Americans that believe in lower taxes and may even believe in God are now on the ‘Terrorists Watch list’. Moreover the satanic Muslim murdering sons of Lucifer, who commit real terrorism, have been reduced to “Man made disasters”. We wouldn’t want to disrespect the real terrorists. That wouldn’t be politically correct or very multicultural of us. Or as the Brits would say… “It just wouldn’t be Cricket”.

Please don’t believe me, read it for yourself. The classified orders given by Secretary Janet Napolitano, the new Obama ‘enforcer stooge’-

This is what happens when you give up your rights for a little security…"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)

I rest my case…

de Andréa

The First American Dictator

On January sixth 2009 Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., introduced the bill, H. J. Res. 5, which, according to the bill's language, proposes "an amendment to the Constitution to repeal the twenty-second article of the amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

By de Andréa

So just what is the 22nd Amendment? In short, it prevents a president no matter how well liked or how good he or she may be for the country, from becoming a permanent dictator of America; a maximum of two terms, 8 years, or 10 years under certain circumstances.

This is a joint resolution between both houses of Congress that would repeal the 22nd Amendment and pave the way for al-Barrack Hussein Obammah to become the first dictator of America.

Some in Congress are hoping to make it possible for Barack Obama to seek not only just a second term in office, but a third and forth or depending on just how corrupt the system is by then, possibly indefinite.

The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary is considering the bill that would repeal the Constitution's 22nd Amendment that prohibits a president from being elected to more than two terms in office.

One of al-Obammah’s henchmen Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., introduced the bill as nearly the first order of business in congress. H. J. Res. 5,

In the past, some presidents have been critical of the 22nd Amendment, including Eisenhower, Clinton, and Reagan. Of course I don’t believe in their wildest nightmares they thought that an Obama would ever become president of these United States.

In 1807 Thomas Jefferson, however, warned that presidents not bound by term limits could use their "popularity and power to become kings".

"If some termination to the services of the chief magistrate be not fixed by the Constitution or supplied in practice," Jefferson wrote to the Legislature of Vermont, "his office, nominally for years, will in fact become for life; and history shows how easily that degenerates into an inheritance."

However, Presidential term limits, were not "fixed by the Constitution" until ratification of the 22nd Amendment which was passed by congress on March 21, 1947, shortly after the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt, the first and only president to be elected to more than two terms. (He was elected to four). The Amendment was ratified by the required number of states on Feb. 26, 1951.

The 22nd Amendment states, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

The Amendment limits presidents to a maximum of eight years in office – or, under unusual circumstances, such as succession following the death of a president, a maximum of ten years in office. Should Rep. Serrano succeed in repealing the Amendment, Obama would be cleared to run for an unlimited number of terms, restricted only by the vote of the electorate.

Serrano's proposal must be approved by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress and ratified by three-quarters of the states' legislatures in order to achieve repeal of the 22nd Amendment.

This is not Serrano’s first attempt to repeal the 22nd Amendment and hopefully not his last. Serrano introduced H. J. Res. 11 to the 108th Congress to accomplish the same purpose in 2003. A similar resolution, H.J. Res. 25, was also proposed the same year and received co-sponsorship from a bipartisan group of six other representatives. In 1987, during Reagan's term of office, Earl Michener, R-Mich., also proposed a repeal of the 22nd Amendment.

This bill is currently in the house ‘Judiciary Committee’, hopefully that is where it will die. The text of the bill is simple; it just repeals the 22nd Constitution Amendment that protects America from a Hitler, a Stalin, or maybe an Obama.

111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 5
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 6, 2009
Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
Article--

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’

May God be with us…

de Andréa

Global Corruption

Four pounds of Anthrax in a suitcase carried through the tunnels from Mexico to the U.S. could kill 330.000 Americans in one hour.

To find out who said that, watch a video and listen to what is being taught in Mosques across America. Because the audio is in Arabic, be sure to use the pause button when necessary to read the translation. Truly an alarming video every westerner should see.

By de Andréa

This article should blow you right out of your shoes and socks, if it doesn’t, then I am sorry, but you are part of the problem.

Get set for an evening of videos that, if you are a true freedom loving American, will change the way you think about politics and history forever.

First, I hope that you have already watched the first video. What you just witnessed on that video is what is being taught in Mosques across America. An undercover investigation, not by the CIA or FBI or even Homeland Security but by an independent civilian organization made up of ex-agents from many of those government agencies as well as ex-military intelligence etc. revealed that 90% of the Mosques in the U.S. teach militant Islamic hatred and Jihad against America. What of the other 10%? Well…they could not be successfully infiltrated…

Your government is ignorantly and or by design promoting the advancement of this dangerous Islamic ideology because they are deceived. If freedom is to be saved for your children and future generations it will be up to you.

Next watch a video about how the Nation of Islam will take over Europe Russia Canada and America. “The World Changing Demographics” A must see Click Here .

Now the final video sent to me by one of my faithful readers portrays a life changing lesson in what is and has been going on since the very beginning of this Republic, beginning with history right up to and including today, the systematic plan of an elite few of global financiers to create the…The New World Order.

Global Corruption is the order of the day in the Video titled “The Obama Deception” deceived by design. (The full length version)

While Obama is nothing but a puppet, this video produced by Alex Jones, an independent investigative reporter and political talk show host, lays out and connects the dots of what I have known in bits an pieces for the last 30 years.

Please set aside about an hour of your time to watch this complete documentary, it will truly be worth your time. Moreover as I said, it will completely change how you view politics forever.

Watch “The Obama Deception” (The full length version)

Prepare your family for global corruption and a rough road ahead.

And may God protect us…

de Andréa

A Matter of Conscience

"The right of conscience” That right, the letter says, is codified in Iowa Code 146.1. "This right is based upon the simple truth that it is wrong to force anyone to violate his or her conscience."

”We enjoy the protections of this right guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa Constitutions. This right of conscience protects individuals against coercion by the state authority, and serves as the first line of defense against the cancer of tyranny."

By de Andréa
April 30, 2009

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is warning the county recorders' offices in his state that workers must process "marriage" licenses for same-sex duos or face possible charges in a court of law. "If necessary, we will explore legal actions to enforce and implement the court's ruling, working with the Iowa Dept. of Public Health and county attorneys" he warned on his website. Does anyone hear bells? This seems to have the ring of despotism.

But an announcement today from a statewide pro-family organization and a public interest law firm with a reach that goes around the world means the issue of same-sex weddings eventually could end up back in the Iowa state Supreme Court. The statements from Miller relate to the state Supreme Court's decision that Iowa must provide same-sex couples access to the state's marriage processes. Miller praised the decision as "clear and well-reasoned" and explained it is expected to take effect April 27.

In a series of messages on his website, he first "advised" recorders and registrars to provide "full access" to marriage. Then he instructed: "A county registrar should furnish the forms in the same manner as in opposite gender applications."

"The Supreme Court's decision … does change state law [Miller admitted]: the decision expressly strikes from Iowa Code chapter 595 the language which limits civil marriage to a man and a woman," he said. --- I am curious now --- since when, can a court change or make law? Every state constitution and the U.S. constitution clearly indicates that the only person or groups of persons that can make or change law are elected legislators. Is this one of the indicators of tyranny by the judicial system?

Then came the warning that "legal actions" could be pursued, “We must live by and follow what the courts decide," he said. This is one twisted Attorney General what happened to living by the law, and following what the law says?

A letter sent to county recorders by the Alliance Defense Fund says Miller is forgetting completely about "one of the most foundational rights and liberties we enjoy as Iowans and as Americans" … "the right of conscience."

That right, the letter says, is codified in Iowa Code 146.1. "This right is based upon the simple truth that it is wrong to force anyone to violate his or her conscience," said the letter.

Also the Iowa Family Policy Council cites the motto on the seal of the state, which reads, "Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain."

"This noble motto … is emblematic of the moral sentiments of Iowans from the banks of the Missouri to the waters of the Mighty Mississippi. … As citizens of the State of Iowa and thus, the United States, we enjoy the protections of this right guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa Constitutions. This right of conscience protects individuals against coercion by the state authority, and serves as the first line of defense against the cancer of tyranny."

The letter suggests counties adopt policies that ensure no one will be required to "issue or process a marriage license, or to perform, assist, or participate in such procedures, against that individual's religious beliefs or moral convictions." The suggested policy continues: "A person shall not discriminate against any individual in any way, including but not limited to employment, promotion, advancement, transfer, licensing, education, training, or the granting of employment privileges or conditions, because of the individual's participation in or refusal to participate in the issuance of a marriage license."

If Miller does not like that, the ADF "will defend this policy language and will provide free legal review and defense if this policy is challenged on the basis of its content.
This policy would protect objecting employees from being forced to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if doing so would violate the employee's conscience,” the ADF said.

Doug Napier, ADF senior legal counsel, said government employees who believe in marriage as the union of one man and one woman should not be penalized for abiding by their beliefs. "This policy allows an employee who does not wish to violate his or her own conscience by issuing a marriage license to a same-sex couple to abstain and allow the transaction to be performed by someone who is willing to do it," he said. "Forcing them to participate in offensive acts contrary to their deeply held beliefs in order to remain employed is unconstitutional”.

"Contrary to the threatening statement issued by Attorney General Tom Miller on April 21, the citizens of Iowa enjoy the protections of the right of conscience guaranteed in the U.S. and Iowa constitutions – the very constitutions that county recorders swore to uphold when taking office," Napier said. "Mr. Miller conveniently omitted any discussion of their rights of conscience or the recorders' duty to protect the rights of their employees.

"This right of conscience protects individuals against heavy-handed coercion by the state, including the attorney general," he said.

Napier said the Iowa marriage law was settled and supported by Iowans, but then the court justices "stepped outside of [their] proper role of interpreting the law and has instead overruled the will of the people and created new law."

Miller, on his web page, affirmed that the justices were creating new law.
Napier said the solution would be for the state legislature to allow state residents to vote on the issue. The Iowa Family Policy Council already has begun work on that effort at a website promoting a marriage amendment.

A spokesman for the state organization said it had been contacted by a number of recorders or their employees expressing concern that the state's orders on a moral issue would violate their religious beliefs.

The same issue arose when a state court in California last year ruled there that county offices must issue same-sex "marriage" licenses. Several county officials were in the position of developing a challenge to the orders when voters took the issue in hand and in November overruled the court.

The voters in California embedded in their state constitution the definition of marriage limited to one man and one woman. In California then as in Iowa now, state officials rewrote state forms and procedures even though the legislators are the only agencies authorized to write law.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This kind of twisted manipulation and perversion of the legal and ‘judiciary system’ is a clear indication of the foundation of tyranny being constructed. Why does the legislature feel the need to write new law to override the law of the court which overrode the law of the legislature? Am I getting dizzy or what? This is what happens when we have a court system that has run a-muck, has become a loose cannon, and gone off the tracks. The separation of powers apparently no longer exists.

In California the people have a right by initiative to vote in law, which they did. The courts overruled it and the people had to vote for a new law to override the courts law, which they did. Now the people are waiting to see of the court will again make a new law to override the last law…

I think I’m getting dizzy again…

de Andréa

The Path of Greed Leads to Hell

Great Britain got what they asked for, MONEY and plenty of it. The problem is it comes with a price, a big price…They will owe their soul to Allah.

By de Andréa

Why is it that Great Britain is now faced with ‘Islamic Terrorism’ every where they turn? It is because they have exchanged ‘Parliamentary law’ for ‘Sharia law’. Britain now has 12 Shariah courts, publicly-funded Shariah Islamic education, welfare benefits for up to four wives for every Muslim man, legal honor killings, children falling off school rosters because they are being forced into child marriages, raging domestic violence and spousal abuse, and "no-go" zones where even British police are afraid to enter for fear of starting Islamic violent Jihad. Watch a video of Muslims chasing British police.

Watch a video of a similar demonstration in Fort Lauderdale Florida You will see the only real difference is in Florida the police are not running away. Not yet they aren’t. The Fort Lauderdale demonstration was just 2 months earlier in late 2008.

As I have frequently noted, Britain’s policy of politically correct multiculturalism, in other words the “outreach” to the Islamic community has failed to accomplish what it hoped to accomplish. A critical aspect of this “outreach” has been Britain’s embrace of Shariah finance, Islam’s religions version of banking. As Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared in 2006, London was going to be the Islamic Banking Capital of the World. Why? Money, and he got it. But along with Muslim money comes Muslim Law, Sharia law.

At the June 13, 2006 Islamic Finance Trade Conference in London, Brown revealed, "Today British banks are pioneering Islamic banking - London now has more banks supplying services under Islamic principles than any other Western financial centre."

By 2012 police, as in London, will be running from the Islamic Jihad in American streets.

Cancer starts as a microbe
Because so many top business leaders, university professors, government officials, and religious leaders in Great Britain have bought into the fiction that Shariah Banking is just a harmless religious requirement for Islamic investment, there are few there in positions of leadership left to fight against Shariah. While I noted a positive development, the re-thinking of some of the British policy regarding the connection between Islamist doctrine and terrorism, can such a shift actually occur with Britain so beholden to Shariah finance and its money without a civil war, (Islamic Jihad)?

For those of you who have seen Joy Brighton's video about Shariah finance on Brigitte Gabriel’s website, you will know that one of the leading "Shariah finance scholars" himself, Sheik Qawadari, describes Shariah Banking as "Jihad with Money.” You will know the story of what Shariah Banking is, its connection to the Shariah Law of Wahhabist Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Taliban, and will know that its creation as a tool of political Islam to control global economics is not being told.

You will also know that Shariah is already here in the U.S., thanks to the lack of oversight by the SEC and U.S. Treasury Department, and the acceptance of Shariah finance by institutions such as Citibank, HSBC, UBS and AIG, (read the article)

Is the West ready for this? Actually, the better question to ask is this: Does the West understand that the embrace of Shariah finance is the eventual embrace of the brutal and oppressive Shariah law? The answer is no… Read the response I received from AIG regarding my warning about Sharia Finance, they haven’t got a clue.

Because of this deception the States of Minnesota and Michigan have officially adopted Sharia Finance and incorporated it into their standard banking system. The cancer is no longer a microbe, it is beginning to metastasize.

The problem is this, as with a cancer, Islam does not become part of your culture. You will become part of theirs. As I have recently written in the article titled “to the shores of Som-ali” , the U.S. has been at war with Islam for 200 years already , and as the Western Europeans in the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries didn’t recognize that they had already been at war with Islam for three hundred years before they became cognizant of the fact that Islam does not assimilate, they would have to --- they didn’t want to, so 200 years of war began. This 200 years of war insolently, was called the Crusades.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Most Americans have never experienced war, except by way of a video that is happening in someone else’s yard in some far away land. But that is not the kind of war that I am talking about. I’m talking about the kind of war that takes place in your yard.

As the Western Europeans both of more than a thousand years ago as well as today didn’t and do not understand the most fundamental truth about Islam, and that is that they will never assimilate and the will never stop.

America is following right in the British footsteps of the Greed that leads to Hell.

de Andréa

A Gentle Lady

The controversial Ann Coulter writes about the memories of her mother who recently passed away

Dear de Andrea,

A lot of people claim to be my No. 1 fan – God bless them – but my true No. 1 fan left this world last week. My mother quietly stopped breathing last Tuesday, as she slept peacefully, holding my hand.

She was the biggest fan of all of us – Father, me and my brothers, John and Jim.

After reading the eulogy column I wrote for Father last year – not to excess, probably only about 4,637 times – Mother realized to her chagrin that she wouldn't be able to read the eulogy column I'd be writing for her, and started hinting that maybe I could rustle up a draft so she could take a peek.

But I couldn't do it, until I had to.
The only thing Mother wanted to be sure my brothers and I included in her remembrances, were her contributions to the Republican Party, the New Canaan Republican Town Committee and the Daughters of the American Revolution.

She was a direct descendant of at least a dozen patriots who served the cause of the American Revolution and traced her lineage on both sides of her family to Puritan nonconformists who came to America in 1633 seeking religious freedom on a ship led by Pastor Thomas Hooker. Or, as Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano would call them, "A dangerous right-wing extremist hate group."

Even back in the Puritan days, Mother's female ancestors were brought up on charges for their heretical dressing styles (and then sassed the judge). During the Revolution, one female ancestor, Effie Ten Eyck Van Varick, contributed to the rebel cause by donating lead for bullets from the curtain weights in her home in what was, even then, traitorous, loyalist Manhattan.

Mother's deep-seated political activism saved me on more than one occasion.
At the 2004 Republican National Convention, I was taking my parents to a lot of the parties in New York and, at one of them, Herman Cain walked up to me and told me he was a big fan even though I probably didn't know who he was.
Cain was the former president and CEO of Godfather's Pizza who was then running for the U.S. Senate from Georgia. I had seen him on Fox News' "Cavuto" – but I couldn't remember his name for the life of me.

Luckily for me, Mother was standing next to me and she piped in, "I know who you are – I donated to your campaign." Thank you, Mommy!

Mother probably contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to various conservative outfits over the years – all in her little $20 checks – especially to any organization that claimed it was going to stop Hillary. In fact, if they mentioned Hillary in their letter, Mother sometimes made it $25.

My brothers and I always figured we'd have no inheritance, but there would be a lovely memorial to Oliver North somewhere.

Mother may have thought her most notable characteristic was her Republican activism, but, for the rest of us, it was her constant, unconditional love. She was a little love machine, spreading warmth and joy wherever she went.

Every time she'd see me, even after just a few days' absence, she'd hug me as if I had been lost in the Himalayan Mountains for the past 20 years.

On Mother's birthday last year, I had a dinner party for her with Rush Limbaugh, Conrad Black and my friends Peter and Angie.

Mother was always delighted to be with people talking about politics – actually she told me that, lately, she was delighted to be around any conversations that didn't involve who had a doctor's appointment or who had died that day.

So I let her stay up until 3 a.m. that night, well past her bedtime. Mother was so happy that after I had her all tucked in and the lights out, I heard her singing herself to sleep.
Even on the rare occasions when I'd be cross with her, she'd completely forget about it, and within 10 seconds would be telling me what a wonderful, precious daughter I was. My brother Jimmy found out recently that she'd even forgotten that he had caused her to miss Reagan's first inauguration by getting in a car accident the night before we were leaving – and she never should have forgotten that.

Everyone wanted my mother to be his mother. (The "his" in that sentence is grammatically correct and Mother would never let us forget it.) I'm sure everyone thinks he has the perfect mother, but we really did.

Since I was a little girl, friends, relatives and neighbors would bring their problems to Mother. She had a rare combination of being completely moral and completely nonjudgmental at the same time – the exact opposite of liberals who have absolutely no morals and yet are ferociously judgmental.

You could tell Mother anything, get good counsel and not end up feeling worse about yourself.

Several of Mother's New Canaan friends sent us notes last week, calling her a "gentle lady" and remarking that she never had an unkind word for anyone.

As a family member, I can assure you that – much to our annoyance – she really did never have an unkind word for anyone. I mean, except Democrats, but not anyone she knew.

Whenever the rest of us would be making fun of someone – trust me, always for good and sound reasons – Mother would somehow manage to muster up a defense of the miscreant. Father would always smile and say, "Your mother defends everyone."

She was, in fact, such a "gentle lady" that I had to go to her doctors' appointments and hospital visits with her and be her Mother Lion. If officious hospital administrators had told Mother to get off a gurney, go outside in the pouring rain and stand on one foot for three hours before the doctor would see her, she'd thank them profusely and apologize for being such a bother.

She viewed her doctors' appointments as social visits, which is the other reason I'd have to go with her, to make sure we eventually got around to the business end of the appointment.

When she began her final decline last fall, she had to go to her Connecticut doctor without me to find out what was wrong. This was the first time she didn't seem to be getting better after a chemo treatment.

So I had been worrying about her appointment all day, but when I called her that night, she immediately turned the subject to me and asked me how my book was going.
I insisted on knowing if she had seen the doctor and she perked up and brightly told me that, oh yes, she had seen him, he had all my books in his office, he was worried about Obama, too, and he has such beautiful children!

Before she launched into a spirited discussion of his children's extracurricular activities and triumphs on the athletic field, I had to ask her, "Mommy, did the doctor happen to say anything about why you're feeling lousy?"

It turned out, of course, that it was the ovarian cancer – as well as the massive amounts of poison she had been receiving to kill the cancer over the past five years. That was the beginning of the end.

Now I'll never be able to introduce my Mother to friends and surprise them with her charming Southern accent.

And I'll never see my mother's beautiful face again, at least not for the next several decades here on Earth. I've been looking at her across the room in doctors' offices over the past few years, thinking to myself: There will come a point when you won't see that face again.

Her angelic face always looked like home to me. My whole life, as soon as I'd see my mother's face I'd know I was safe, whether I was a little girl lost in a department store or a big girl with a problem, who needed her mother.

Thanks to the doctors at Memorial Sloan-Kettering and mother's fighting Kentucky spirit, we got to see that face much longer than anyone ever expected.

So now she's with Daddy and Jesus. Every single day since Daddy died last year, Mother would say how much she missed him and gaze at his photo, telling us what an amazing man he was and repeating his little expressions and jokes. Even though I miss her, I'm glad they're together again.

I don't know about Jesus, but I think Daddy was getting impatient. But Mommy was always running a little bit late.

Ann

‘Mother may I’

This is what the once free America will be asking of the new ‘National’ not Federal Government of the United States.

By de Andréa

President Obama showed his socialistic hand this week when The New York Times wrote that he is considering converting the stock the government owns in our country's banks from preferred stock, which it now holds, to common stock.

Socialism
That’s right, and since the new National Government is the largest stock holder in over 500 financial companies, the Government would control the economy.

This seemingly insignificant change is actually momentous. It means that the federal (New National) government will control all of the major banks and financial institutions in the nation. It means socialism.

The Times dutifully put a spin on the Obama plan, deceptively disguised as a way to avoid asking Congress for more money for failing banks. But the implications of the proposal are obvious to anyone with at least a half of an unwashed brain.

When the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) intervention was first outlined by the Bush administration, it did not call for any transfer of stock, of any sort, to the government, not even Preferred.

The Democrats demanded, as a price for their support, that the taxpayers "get something back" for the money they were lending to the banks. House Republicans, wise to what was going on, rejected the administration's proposal, and sought, instead, to provide insurance to banks, rather than outright cash. Their plan did not involve any transfer of stock. But Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., not surprisingly undercut his own party's conservatives and went along with the Democratic plan to nationalize the banks, ensuring its passage.

But to avoid the issue of a potential for government control of the banks, everybody agreed that the stock the feds would take back in return for their money would be “preferred stock”, “not common stock”. "Preferred stock" means that these stockholders get the first crack at dividends, but only common stockholders can actually vote on company management or policy.

Now, by changing this fundamental element of the TARP plan, Obama will give Washington a voting majority among the common stockholders of these banks and other financial institutions. The almost 500 companies receiving TARP money will be, in effect, run by Washington.

And whoever controls the banks, controls the credit, and therefore the economy.
That's called socialism my friend.

Obama is dressing up the idea of the switch to common stock by noting that the conversion would provide the banks with capital they could use without a further taxpayer appropriation.

While this is true, it flies in the face of the fact that an increasing number of big banks and brokerage houses are clamoring to give back the TARP money. Goldman-Sachs, for example, wants to buy back its freedom, as do many banks. Even AIG is selling off assets to dig its way out from under federal control.

The reason, of course, is that company executives do not like the restrictions that come with TARP money. It is for this reason that Chrysler Motors refused TARP funds.

With bank profits up and financial institutions trying to give back their money, there is no need for the conversion of the government stock from preferred to common — except to advance the political socialist agenda of this administration.

Meanwhile, to keep its leverage over the economy intact, the Obama administration is refusing to let banks and other companies give back the TARP money until they pass a financial "stress test."

Nominally, the government justifies this procedure by saying that it does not want companies to become fully private prematurely and then need more help later on.

But don't believe it, my friend

They want to keep the TARP money in the banks so they can have a reason and rationale to control them.

THE BOTTOM LINE is simple. If you are an entrepreneur, a small business owner like me, then get ready to be an employee of the new National Socialist Government of America.

de Andréa

When Only Criminals Have Guns

When the people have no right to bear Arms, should Christians “carry” guns?

By de Andréa
April 22, 2009

The Apostle Paul wrote in a letter to Timothy, “But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially of those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever…” “Provision” includes providing security. In fact our Lord Jesus taught, “If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.” Quoting Jesus again, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind,' and 'your neighbor as yourself,” Are we loving our neighbor when we stand helplessly by and do nothing when he is being murdered or a woman is being raped?

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms”… is not only a God given right supported by the Supreme Law of America but it is a command of God as well.

Should church members be armed?
Author Charl Van Wyk, who shot back at terrorists attacking a church meeting, will be touring the U.S. with tales of his African ministry, including his first-hand experience with Christian churches that aren't prepared to defend themselves.

Van Wyk's story of shooting back on July 25, 1993, when terrorists attacked and killed 11 people and injured another five dozen at a South African church, has been chronicled in his book "Shooting Back: The Right and Duty of Self-Defense."

Police later told him the terrorists confessed that their plan was to kill everyone in the church, possibly 1,000 people or more, and his armed response is credited with saving many lives that day.

Through his ministry with Frontline Fellowship, Van Wyk has been working in regions that could be called "war-torn" sections of Africa, except that in the Congo, for example, there is no one shooting back, no one is armed like he was during the St. James Massacre to prevent further bloodshed. Rather than calling these places "war-torn zones," Van Wyk contends, they should simply be called “Gun Free Murder Zones."

Van Wyk warns of the plight of Congolese churches he has seen in a nation where outlaws carry guns, but the people have no right to bear arms.

After interviewing a woman whose village was raped and terrorized by armed rebels and learning of a pastor who was buried alive while his congregation helpless to fight back, Van Wyk wrote a letter to the editor in the Congo, it began: "It is very difficult for armed thugs to perform such tyranny if the local population were armed and could defend themselves. This kind of thuggery can only take place in a gun-free zone.”

A memory of the massacre in the “Gun Free Zone” of Virginia Tech University comes to mind.
“To create a safe nation, arm the population," Van Wyk said, referring to the recently much-publicized massacre of more than a dozen immigrants in New York, he added, "An armed citizen could have made a difference at Binghamton."

"When last did you hear of a multiple-victim shooting taking place on a firearm range, in a police station or at a gun show, or wherever many firearms are found anywhere in the world? You haven't. That's because criminals prefer unarmed victims, or soft targets," Van Wyk says. "No wonder they love gun control – it makes their satanic work so much easier and their working environment much safer."

Van Wyk's experience in regions of Africa where criminals are armed but the citizenry is not has seasoned his perspective, but he warns that Americans cannot fail to be diligent in protecting their Second Amendment rights.

While we are approaching the 15-year anniversary of what now is known as the St. James Massacre, the United Nations has a disarmament program to remove private firearms from all nations. Hundreds of millions of people throughout the world suffer hideously through political systems, which have imposed a disarmament program based on the lies of banning guns will stop crime. This is reminiscent of Hitler’s deception to confiscate all the guns before his despotic oppression began.

He added, "In South Africa, the communist-inspired African National Congress is imposing a politically motivated disarmament program that will leave law-abiding citizens defenseless.” There is a war of worldviews on gun control being fought right now across the world as well as in America.

"We have no choice except action," he said. "The results of gun control can indeed be catastrophic, e.g., Rwanda was a gun-free zone and so too is Zimbabwe today. This period of our history is decisive. Are our children going to live as slaves or as a free people?"

THE BOTTOM LINE: So what does this have to do with the Christian Church in America? If you don’t know then read this article again only this time replace Congo with America, replace Zimbabwe with America, replace Rwanda with America. There is now, more than ever before a thrust to disarm America and the rest of the world. A gun free Zone is a place where criminals and tyrants rule.

It’s already happening in our schools and in our churches. Read Church Shootings in America.
There is a good reason why the architects of our free ‘Constitutional Republic’ supported our God given responsibility to “keep and bear arms”. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” (Article II of the bill of rights) It is necessary to the security of a free State. And this my friend, is being illegally infringed upon --- big time --- by the Godless tyrants of our liberal government.

Without it, we not only lose the precious gift of freedom, but the precious life that God gave us as well.

In Proverbs 25:26 God says: “A righteous man who falters before the wicked is like a murky spring and a polluted well.”

It is our responsibility.

It is the law of America and of God…

de Andréa

…”to the Shores of Som-ali”.

One of the ignorant arguments made by those who are enamored with ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Multi-Culturalism’ is that the growing Islamist militancy directed at the United States is a direct result of our failed Middle Eastern policies. As I said, ignorant arguments…

By de Andréa


Now that Somali Jihadist Pirates have increased their attacks to merit a regular place on the 6:00 news, it may be useful to take a quick look back at history – at the role that the Barbary Jihadist pirates played in the development of the United States Navy.

Two hundred years ago the U.S. had no “Middle East policy” for Islamists to quarrel with except to pay the Muslim pirate demanded tribute called the Jizyah. Our foreign policy then was decidedly isolationist. And yet in spite of submitting to the demands of the muslins, for four decades, the so-called “Barbary Pirates” raided American shipping, kidnapped and murdered American citizens, and in general wreaked havoc on our country, moreover they continue yet today and once again we are in submission to them. Watch a video of American president al-Obammah bowing in submission to the King of Islam.


Independent and knowledgeable historians, who don’t owe their souls to the political establishment and do not bow down to political correctness, understand why the Barbary Pirates of Tripoli did what they did – they were Islamic Terrorist Jihadists then, and the Somali Pirates of today are still Islamic Terrorist Jihadists. Proof again that Islam will never change direction. They as the Nazis did in the 1930’s and 40’s are simply following a script written in the Quran and in the Hadith.

So why is the alphabet soup media avoiding stating this fact? Because the American media never tells the truth, that’s why!!! Those who ignore the truth of history are condemned to repeat it.

Get set for a profound lesson in history not taught in the ‘Liberal Indoctrinational Institutions’ that are today, tragically misnamed as “Institutions of education”

The Somali Piracy in Context On April 6 in an address to the parliament of Turkey, US President Obama said that the relationship between the United States and the "Muslim world" is an important one. "In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical," the president said. During the same address the President stated, "We are not at war with Islam. We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many centuries to shape the world for the better, including my own country.”

First of all, this jerk does not speak for me, even though he thinks he is my president. The arrogant assumption he coveys by saying “"We are not at war with Islam. [and] We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith”… Well I for one want his ‘Grand Mufti al-Obammah’ to know that ‘I am’ at war with Islam, and that I have absolutely no appreciation for the Muslim faith, deep, or otherwise. His arrogant effrontery assumption of the usage of the personal pronoun “WE” and using it as a noun or even a proper noun to identify the specific citizens of America like you and me or we, that he thinks he represents is at best obnoxious, at worst treasons.

Moreover, Mr. Obama has at least neglected to explain in what way(s) Islam has shaped and improved the United States or for that matter, anything or anyplace since the year 610 AD. The founding fathers of the United States were Christians and not Muslims, therefore did not, and do not share Mr. Obama's deep appreciation for ‘the Islamic Terrorist faith’. In fact Jefferson, Adams, JQ Adams, and Benjamin Franklin were all were deeply concerned about the dangers that Islam represented to the new nation of America. Today according our government, they are just a warm and fuzzy peaceful Nation, (a politically-correct policy.)

I have written about this subject many times in the past, but I thought it worth repeating, especially in light of the recent Islamic Piracy, this time off the coast of Somali instead of the Barbary Coast of Tripoli.

Our ongoing experiences with the 21st century version of the Barbary pirates off the coast of Somalia, most recently today when an American freighter captain was freed from pirate captivity by the US Navy, illustrates a great deal about our prior relations with the so-called "religion of peace" and how our previous leaders reacted. There is little discussion in the mainstream press about the link between Somali Islamic, piracy, and Islamic Jihad, but it is historically one in the same nonetheless.


In spite of the news media distancing itself from the recent attack on a cruise ship off the coast of Somalia from global terrorism, intelligence experts believe this is just the latest operation initiated against the United States and the West by Al-Qaeda. (Source)


The irony perhaps is that Islam did in fact play a very important role in the early stages of the development of the United States - Islam was directly responsible for the early development of the United States Navy and Marines for the concepts that allowed for its deployment far from our coasts.

The American Navy is not a river navy or coastal defense force; it is a global tool of American power whose origins can be traced directly back to an earlier American-Islam confrontation. After the American Revolution, pirates from the Barbary States (Algiers, Morocco) attacked American shipping off the coast of North Africa in the Mediterranean and took the crews. This piracy against American shipping started in 1784 and finally ended in 1815. The Islamic rulers of these Barbary States demanded payment of tribute from our new country and it was paid, and paid. President Jefferson sent a naval force against the pirates in 1803-05. The Marine Corps were also sent in and after a long overland march, took the city of Tripoli in 1805 (thus "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Corps hymn). Is the Somali piracy of today related to the Barbary pirates of the early 19th century? When then Ambassadors Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Ambassador from Tripoli in 1785, to reach a solution to the attacks against American shipping and crews, they were immersed into a very dark world in which we are still subjected today.


"When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” (Source) The Barbary piracy was based upon the doctrine of Islam, calling for endless war against the unbeliever everywhere, including at sea.


To Muslims in the heyday of Barbary piracy, there were, at least in principle, only two forces at play in the world: the Dar al-Islam, or House of Islam, and the Dar al-Harb, or House of War. The House of Islam meant Muslim governance and the unrivaled authority of the Sharia, Islam’s complex system of holy law. The House of War was simply everything that fell outside of the House of Islam — that area of the globe not under Muslim authority, where the infidel ruled. For Muslims, these two houses were perpetually at war — at least until mankind should finally embrace Allah and his teachings as revealed through his prophet, Mohammed.


Today, we are dealing with the same Islam. Islam is considered perfect, unchangeable, unchallengeable, by adherents. It is the perfect word of the perfect Allah, and carried to the world by Mohammed, the perfect example of humanity for all Muslims to emulate,

History has returned, again.
"The Barbary pirates were not a “radical” or “fundamentalist” sect that had “hijacked” or twisted religious doctrine for power and politics, or that came to recast aspects of their faith out of some form of insanity. They were simply a Islamic North African warrior caste involved in an armed jihad — a mainstream Muslim doctrine. This is how the Muslims understood Barbary piracy and armed Jihad at the time, and, indeed, how the physical jihad has been understood since Mohammed revealed it as the prophecy of Allah."


If the United States was unable to fight the pirates, they would be forced to continue to pay extortion to the Barbary States, a kind of high seas Jizya tax. Jefferson was immediately determined to fight. When he became president he was able to implement the plans that he had formulated after diplomacy to resolve the Barbary piracy had failed. And are we in the same position now? During a phone conversation with a journalist prior to the attack against them by US Navy Seals to free the captured American sailor, one of the Somali Jihadist/pirates said, "We never kill people. We are Muslims. We are marines, coastguards -- not pirates," one said. Not quite marines, not quite coastguard, at least not in the civilized world.


Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America's minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress. As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter, "I acknowledge [sic] I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war.” Paying tribute or giving in to demands, will merely invite more demands, and even if a coalition proves workable, the only solution is a strong navy that can reach the pirates, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: "The states must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some one of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both.” "From what I learn from the temper of my countrymen and their tenaciousness of their money," Jefferson added in a December 26, 1786, letter to the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles, "it will be more easy to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them.” (Source)


When he became the 3rd President, Jefferson took action, and the United States Navy was sent to deal with the Barbary Coast pirates, which they did.


When Jefferson became president in 1801 he refused to accede to Tripoli's demands for an immediate payment of $225,000 and an annual payment of $25,000. The pasha of Tripoli then declared war on the United States. Although as secretary of state and vice president he had opposed developing an American navy capable of anything more than coastal defense, President Jefferson dispatched a squadron of naval vessels to the Mediterranean. As he declared in his first annual message to Congress: "To this state of general peace with which we have been blessed, one only exception exists. Tripoli, the least considerable of the Barbary States, had come forward with demands unfounded either in right or in compact, and had permitted itself to denounce war, on our failure to comply before a given day. The style of the demand admitted but one answer. I sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean. . . .


" We can trace the development of the US Navy directly to Thomas Jefferson's interaction with Jihadist pirates. Our Muslim President Obama was right about the "Islamic faith" having "done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country," but probably not in the way that he had intended. The development of our national defense capabilities are fundamentally linked with an American conflict with Islam in 1805. John Quincy Adams didn't have to deal with the Barbary States directly as president, but his father John Adams did. Considered one of the most brilliant men to sit in the White House, J Q Adams is particularly perceptive about Islam. His warnings on the matter ring as true today as they did more than 100 years ago. The Islam that Adams discusses is the same Islam we see today.


John Quincy Adams possessed a remarkably clear, uncompromised understanding of the permanent Islamic institutions of Jihad war and dhimmitude. Regarding Jihad, Adams states in his essay series. Just how did John Quincy Adams know so much about Islam and how to, or not to, deal with them? He read their books…the Quran and the Hadith, something that our Government has failed to do. Confirming Adams’ assessment, the late Muslim scholar, Professor Majid Khadduri, wrote the following in his authoritative 1955 treatise on Jihad, War and Peace in the Law of Islam:

“Thus the jihad may be regarded as Islam’s instrument for carrying out its ultimate objective by turning all people into believers, if not in the prophet-hood of Muhammad (as in the case of the dhimmahs), at least in the belief of God. ...The universality of Islam, in its all embracing creed, is imposed on the believers as a continuous process of warfare, psychological and political if not strictly military.” source

There is a certain bizarre justice here that our Navy ships were on hand to affect the release of an American ship captain through military action against Somali pirates likely affiliated with Islamism because of events that occurred with other Islamist pirates more than 200 years ago. When you hear in the mainstream press pundits and commentators saying that the Somali piracy is "unprecedented", don't believe it because it is and ignorant lie

And don't believe that our current struggle with political Islam is also unprecedented. This is a conflict of 1400 years. Since 9/11 some of us have accepted this truth. Long before our generation, other Americans struggled with similar matters. Our founding fathers fought the Jihadists of the Barbary States and came to know Islam through their Jihad against innocent unbelievers. By 1830 John Quincy Adams had not forgotten the lesson. We must learn the same lesson again; then, never forget it. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. If we today choose to ignore the lessons of history we are simply condemned - we will have no opportunity to repeat.

“In the seventh century of the Christian era a wandering Arab, of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combing the powers of transcendent genius with the preternatural energy of a fanatic and the fraudulent spirit of an imposter,[Lucifer] proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting, from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God, he connected indissolubly with it the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war as part of his religion against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust; to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature. Between these two religions, thus contrasted in the characters, a war of more than twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extincture of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute are encouraged to furnish motives to human action, there never can be peace on earth and good will toward men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him.” John Adams, 1830

–John Quincy Adams, “Christianity—Islamism” “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War, and on Greece,” originally published in The American Annual Register for 1827—1829 (New York, 1830), Chs. X-XIV: 267—402. (Source)

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is a tragic footing we find ourselves moored in with this historical ignorance, almost as if it were a disease, a deception so prevalent among our government officials. Without the knowledge of where one has been, it is a problem to comprehend just how one can be cognizant of where one is going. I believe this identifies the reason for the flailing nature of our leaders. It is quite simply a lack of intellectual knowledge of history. Unless one is cognizant of the lesson that history teaches, history is just a useless story of fiction. Ignorance of history condemns one or all to repeat the same tragic mistakes all over again.

We will soon find ourselves reliving the eighth, ninth, and tenth century’s of Western Europe. We as Americans have been fighting Islam for 200 years now, I suppose we have yet another one hundred years to go before we as the people of western Europe discovered after 300 years of Islamic infiltration, that if they (the people of Europe) did not rid themselves of the demonic curse of Islam, they would become Muslim rather that the Muslims becoming Europeans.

Does a fish become a frog? Yes, but a frog, never becomes a fish.

It is just the nature of things…

de Andréa

Has The Tyranny of America Begun?

If you still don’t believe that your Government has declared war on Christians then this article is for you. I have film…

By de Andréa

Referring to my previous articles titled Declaration of War and The New enemy of the State , proof that the war on Christian Conservatives or anyone that doesn’t agree with the direction that this administration is going, that the tyranny of this administration has begun, is born out in this totally unprovoked attack on an innocent Baptist Pastor by Federal border agents and local police 75 miles from any border.

The classified orders giving by Secretary Janet Napolitano, the new Obama ‘enforcer stooge’--- chief of the so-called U.S. Homeland security regime to begin the war on Christian Conservatives, was actually leaked to the press and wasn’t supposed to be known by the Citizens of America until we began to realize that Christian Constitutional Conservatives were being arrested on trumped up charges, tortured and beaten like what happened to an Arizona Baptist pastor this past week.

An Arizona pastor was Tasered, beaten, stomped, and bloodied, by broken glass, and sporting 11 stitches in his head – claims his injuries came from being stopped at a Border Patrol checkpoint 75 miles inside the U.S. while traveling from San Diego California to Phoenix Arizona. Several miles east of Yuma he was stopped and battered and tortured by police for refusing to allow agents to search his vehicle for human trafficking even though he was obviously the only one in the vehicle.

The incident earlier this week highlights the new war on the citizens of America, the tension between constitutional rights, the issue of border security, and a controversial Supreme Court ruling that grants homeland security an exceptional level of police authority near the Mexican border. The fact that this was 75 miles from any border I guess didn’t occur to the U.S. Federalies. Pastor Steven Anderson of “Faithful Word” Baptist Church in Tempe Arizona claims he did nothing to deserve his eventual arrest and believes that when he refused to allow the search of his car he was simply standing up for his Fourth Amendment rights, which protect him against unreasonable search without a warrant or probable cause.

Anderson further questions why the Border Patrol is allowed without provocation to randomly stop and search cars at a checkpoint along Interstate 8, 75 miles inland of where the highway nears the Mexican border at Yuma, Arizona.

"I was in the United States! I had crossed no international border!" writes Pastor Anderson in commentary accompanying a video he made about his experience. "I didn't have any drugs; I didn't have human beings in my car," he claims in the video itself. "Why is this happening in the United States of America?"

This is where the Pastor went wrong, the claim that he did nothing to deserve this torture, beating and abuse, is just wrong. You see he made a near fatal mistake, he thought that he was still living in the ‘Free Nation of America’, he obviously was not aware that he is now living in the ‘Oppressive Obama-Nation’ and has no rights at all.

Pastor Anderson's video explaining his side of the controversy and his rough treatment at the hands of police officers can be seen here: Watch the video of Pastor Steven Anderson

THE BOTTOM LINE: While we knew that we needed a relationship and communication between our security and intelligence agencies, most of us never realized that the very agencies and government that was supposed to protect us, would one day be used to oppress and abuse us. Well my friend, ‘The Tyranny of America Has Begun’.

Although the fact that Steven Anderson as a Christian Pastor likely had nothing to do with him being stopped, when he introduced himself however as Pastor Steven Anderson all the whistles bells and sirens went off and Pastor Anderson became the “Enemy of the State”

You see Christians are most often conservative and are against The United Nations, The New World Order, Gun Control, The Federal Reserve Act, The Income Tax, The Ammunition and Accountability Act, A possible Constitutional Convention, The North American Union, Universal Service Program, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, The Fairness Doctrine, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Abortion, Gay Marriage, Open Borders, Islam, Illegal Immigration, just to name a few, in other words Americans who believe in the ‘Constitutional Republic of the United States of America’, and therefore have been reclassified by Janet Napolitano and the Homeland Security agency as “domestic terrorists’ an thereby deserving of scrutiny, abuse torture, and arrest. Reverend Steven Anderson didn’t say whether or not he was in or had been in the military, but that also would be a red flag according to Homeland Security.

It is interesting that returning veterans, conservatives, and Christians are now classified as "rightwing extremists" and are associated with white supremacists and violent anti-government terrorist groups, while at the same time Napolitano has reduced the status of the Nation of Islam from terrorism to “man-caused disasters,” a more touchy feely identification for those that have murdered more than 250, 000.000 yes that’s millions of people just because they didn’t like them. We American conservatives are now the new enemies of al-Barack Hussein al-Obammah. And oh! ---bear in mind that his ‘hinnies al- Obama’ says that we are not at war with Islam, no of course not, because “The Obama-Nation” is at war with anyone that might disagree with him and his Muslim Communist regime.

Have you bowed toward Mecca today???

de Andréa

A Declaration of War

The U.S. Government has declared war against the American people and our Constitution.

By de Andrea

Yesterday I published an article titled ”The New Enemy of the State” and declared how this new enemy is “you”… Now a declaration of war exists between the U.S. “National Government” and the ‘Citizens of a Free America’. Although I new this was coming, I never thought it would happen in my life time.

This may call for a new “Declaration of Independence” from the ever and increasing oppressive Government of the [dis]-United States of America. This ‘Federal DHS Declaration’ together with the “Missouri Document” amounts to a declaration of war against the free people of America.

"It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution. It is a prelude to extreme gun control legislation and hate speech laws targeting Christian churches and others who oppose abortion and same sex marriage. The federal government should be focusing its attention on the 35 radical Muslim terrorists camps in the U.S. training its followers on how to kidnap and kill Americans," says Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich.,

But then president al-Obammah said “we are not a war with Islam”, obviously no, because the U.S. Government is to busy focusing on the war with its own citizens. If this doesn’t sound like the old USSR regime then I don’t know what does.

Radio talk show host Michael Savage has teamed up with the Thomas More Law Center to file a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.
"It is a civil rights action brought under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, challenging the policy, practice, and custom of the United States Government that targets for disfavored treatment those individuals and groups that are considered to be 'rightwing extremists,'" the complaint announced today said.

The federal agency recently targeted those individuals in its report called "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." Read the report for yourself.

According to the federal government, members of the suspect group of people include those who:
Oppose infringements on the Second Amendment
Oppose illegal immigration
Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs
Oppose continuation of free trade agreements
Oppose same-sex marriage
Oppose Abortion
Oppose Communist regimes
Oppose one world government
Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world
And those that are upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India etc, etc, etc

The case seeks a declaration that the DHS policy violates the First and Fifth Amendments, a court order permanently enjoining the policy and its application to the plaintiffs' speech and other activities, and the award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.

The Law Center said it had submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the DHS, demanding to know why it targets Americans who oppose abortion, support the 2nd Amendment, and dislike illegal immigration etc, as “domestic terrorist extremists."

"This is not an intelligence report but a diatribe against those who oppose the policies of the Obama administration. It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution”. Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the organization, said of the request.

Are you ready for a second Declaration of Independence? Sign the petition promoting true freedom once again!

Amy Kudwa, a spokeswoman for the DHS, said the agency as a matter of policy doesn't comment on pending litigation.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on behalf of Savage, Gregg Cunningham of the pro-life Center for Bio-Ethical Reform and Iraqi War Marine veteran Kevin Murray.

The federal agency's action "encourages law enforcement officers throughout the nation to target and report citizens to federal officials as suspicious rightwing Christian conservative extremists and potential terrorists because of their beliefs."

"The report even admits that the department has no specific information on any plans of violence by so-called 'rightwing extremists.’ Rather, what they do have is the expression of political opinions by certain individuals and organizations that oppose the Obama administration’s policies, and this expression is protected speech under the First Amendment," Thompson said.

"Janet Napolitano is lying to the American people when she says the report is not based on ideology or political beliefs. In fact, her report would have the admiration of any current or past dictator in the way it targets political opponents," he said.

The legal action alleges the policy "is a tool of intimidation for federal, state, and local government officials. It provides a basis for government officials to abuse their positions of power to stifle political opinion and opposition. Pursuant to the 'Rightwing Extremism Policy,' federal officials will work with state, local, tribal, and private sector entities to conduct surveillance and to gather information in order to deter the activities of those individuals and groups considered to be 'rightwing extremists,'" the legal brief said.

The DHS intention is to enforce the policy through "state and local fusion centers, which are local intelligence centers created by DHS to combat 'terrorism' and related activities that are deemed to be 'criminal,'" the case said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: First I would like to say “I told you so” yes years ago I said the end of freedom is coming. Secondly I would say to Michel Savage ‘bravo my patriotic friend’.

I have to admit though; I truly thought the ‘Oppressive Nation of Islam’ would take over the United States before our own ‘Oppressive Government’ would. But on second thought maybe it is one in the same.

You know! Two birds with one rock…

de Andréa.

The New Enemy of the State

Our government has not even identified our last enemy and they have already come up with a new one.

By de Andréa

So just who is this New Enemy of the State??? Well…it’s…’you’.

Do you believe that the Constitution of the United States of America ‘was, is, and should be’ the supreme law of the land? Then you are the new ‘Enemy of the State’. Do you believe in freedom and God given rights? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Do you call yourself a ‘Christian Conservative’? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Are you in the military or ex-military? Then you are the new enemy of the State. Do you consider yourself an American? Then you are the new enemy of the State.

According to news reports, the New al-Obama Department of Homeland Security headed by Janet Napolitano, is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," labeling citizens ‘opposed to the “BILL OF RIGHTS” restrictions’, returning veterans, conservatives, and Christians as "rightwing extremists" and associating them with white supremacists and violent anti-government terrorist groups, while at the same time reducing the status of the Nation of Islam from terrorists to “man-caused disasters,” a more touchy feely identification for those that have murdered more than 250, 000.000 yes that’s millions of people just because they didn’t like them. We Americans are the new enemies of al-Barack Hussein al-Obammah. No…not because I say so, but because he says so, and oh---bear in mind that his ‘hinnies al- Obama’ says that we are not at war with Islam. No of course not, because he has just submitted the entire United States of America to the Nation of Islam by bowing down to their King.

You read that right -- it appears that the Obama Administration, and especially the DHS under the Obama puppet Janet Napolitano, is trying to demonize political dissent. And it's no big surprise who is directly in their crosshairs: supporters of the “Bill of Rights”, including veterans and gun owners.

Who is funding this kind of nonsense? Well… YOU are. Why would your government spend your money attacking YOU, instead of spending your money PROTECTING you? Because you are the “New Enemy of the State” my friend, you are the ‘new terrorists’.

The report also says that Congressional debates about abortion, illegal immigration and gun control make extremist groups suspicious and give them a rallying cry:

"It is unclear if either bill will be passed into law; nonetheless, a correlation may exist between the potential passage of gun control legislation and increased hoarding of ammunition, weapons stockpiling, and paramilitary training activities among rightwing extremists, [terrorists]" the report said.

Why are they worried? Because since November, more than 7 million people have applied for criminal background checks in order to buy weapons. And as far as the Obama administration is concerned, buying guns equals "weapons stockpiling," buying ammo equals "hoarding of ammunition," and expressing concern about Congress passing gun control legislation qualifies YOU as part of an "extremist group" and therefore the enemy of his new ‘Socialist State of America’

Therefore, you and I are now being viewed as dangerous rightwing extremists that law enforcement officials need to be on the watch for!

This is OUTRAGEOUS!
TELL CONGRESS TO CONDEMN THIS GOVERNMENT ATTACK ON AMERICAN CITIZENS

This report was released "hot on the heels" of another (state) government agency report in February: dubbed the Missouri Document--- the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report titled, "MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement.” In this horrific "law enforcement sensitive" secret police report, Governor Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon; John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety; James Keathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van Godsey, Director of MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential violence-prone "militia members."

According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you qualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member" and therefore a terrorist and an Enemy of the State:

If you oppose---
The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve Act
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
Socialism
The Fairness Doctrine
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Abortion
Gay Marriage
Open Borders
Islam
Illegal Immigration

Just to name a few…

Well, there you have it! You see? Then you ARE a dangerous rightwing extremist, and the ‘New Enemy of the State’.

As ridiculous as that report seems, it was distributed to law enforcement officials across the state of Missouri. And it wasn't until the state government was FLOODED with protests from patriotic Americans across the country, that they finally came out and denounced and retracted the MIAC document.

But now, it's happened again -- but this time, at the Federal level! Our own Federal Government is turning against us, and unless there is a HUGE outpouring of outrage from every part of this nation, it will just keep getting WORSE!

Interestingly enough, no left-leaning political ideologies were identified. No Islamic extremists. No environmental extremists. No anti-American anti-Constitutionalists. Only people holding "conservative" or "right-wing" philosophies were identified in BOTH the MIAC report AND the Homeland Security "assessment" as Enemies of the State.

This shouldn't be too surprising: both of these reports are similar to several other reports currently circulating around various State police agencies, courtesy of DHS-sponsored "Fusion Centers." MIAC is one of those Centers, sponsored by the DHS, and ordered by our new dictator His Excellency al-Barrack Hussein al- Obammah

So now, even military veterans who fought and risked their lives for our liberty and freedom are targets of our own government: The Homeland Security assessment specifically says that "rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.” Does that include me? No I’m Afraid I am too old.

The authors of this assessment are pushing an "Us against Them" philosophy. You and I are being marginalized -- labeled as fringe kooks, "rightwing terrorist extremists," so that it will be easier to violate our liberties and take away our Constitutional rights in the future.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The only thing that will put a STOP to this nonsense is a huge public outcry opposing it. If we do nothing, it will soon be too late to do anything. We either stop it NOW, or it will grow into an out-of-control monster that will monitor and control the personal opinions and speech of every man, woman, and child in this country.

The Irony of this issue is that: This --- my friend is exactly what our Constitution is supposed to prevent our government from doing. Moreover in case all else fails we have the right of the Second Amendment, which Reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, Shall NOT BE INFRINGED.” (Emphasis mine)

Isn’t it interesting that we the people are being accused of forming “a well regulated Militia” as is our right, because it may be “necessary to the security of a free State.” Moreover we the People are being accused of “keeping and bearing arms”, and as our Constitutional law says, the Government “Shell not infringe” on our right to do so.

Just whom… May I ask --- is ‘The New Enemy of the State’ here???

de Andréa

The first Islamic State

Which State will become the first Islamic state in America? In any event, one by one we will become an Islamic Nation

By de Andréa

The state of Michigan for all purposes is in the process of becoming an Islamic State one small town at a time. It will be a close race between the state of Michigan and the state of Minnesota as to who will actually be the first. Islam lays claim to at least three major cities and many more smaller rural towns with Islamic counsels and one with a Muslim Mayor in the state of Michigan. Sharia law is surreptitiously and incrementally being implemented.

As I said it is a race that is hard to call, just who will be the first completely Islamic State in America totally governed by Sharia is anybody’s guess.

Today however Minnesota continues to make the news with stories of suspected Somali-born Islamic terrorists coming out of the state; and Muslims are winning a legal battle against a meat processing facility that refused to knuckle under to their demands; one of at least 20 tax supported publicly-funded charter schools operate in Minnesota this one is called Tarek ibn Zayed Academy (TiZA), and is being sued by the ACLU on the grounds it impermissibly promotes Islam; Muslim cab drivers refusing to pick up passengers who carry alcohol; a community college where the interfaith chapel was taken over by Muslim students and turned into a de facto mosque.

Minnesota has also dived into the world of Shariah law through its state-sponsored program of home mortgage products that are Shariah-compliant.

Is there a coincidence between Minnesota’s efforts to accommodate its Muslim immigrant population and the degree of terrorism that is bubbling up in the state? As Great Britain has learned, and is beginning to re-think, a policy of disconnecting the supremacist ideology of political Islam from mainstream Islam has proven to be a failure.

Great Britain has shown us how not to deal with the threat of Islamic terrorism, but it may be tempting for us to dismiss Britain’s experience as unrelated to us here in the U.S. because, well…they’re “over there.” Could Minnesota be emerging as one of America’s exemplars of how not to deal with this threat? I mean, doesn’t the same logic apply, after all, aren’t…“Michigan and Minnesota way up their???”

FBI raids 3 Minneapolis money-transfer shops
Federal agents raided three Minneapolis money transfer businesses that mainly serve the Somali community Wednesday, seeking records of financial transactions to several African and Middle East countries.

E.K. Wilson, a special agent for the FBI in Minneapolis, confirmed that agents searched the businesses on the city's south side to track money transactions. The businesses are Qaran Express and Aaran Financial, both in the Karmel Mall, near W. Lake Street and Pillsbury Avenue S., and North American Money Transfer Inc., also known as Mustaqbal Express, at the Village Market Mall, at E. 24th Street and Chicago Avenue S.

It's not absolutely clear that the raid was directly connected to a continuing federal investigation into the possible link between these terrorist groups and the disappearances of up to 20 young Somali men in the Twin Cities over the past two years.

Without a trace disappearances are not isolated to Minnesota however. Since 1991 unsolved cases across America of missing persons of any gender, ethnic and religious background have taken a sharp spike upward for no apparent reason other than the increase in Muslim population in the U.S. has spiked in the same way during the same time period. Insolently this spike in missing persons is what originally inspired the TV program “Without a Trace” but isolating the show to possible Islamic terrorism was deemed to be too politically incorrect and anti-multicultural to portray as Islamic terrorist abductions or kidnappings.

To stem the flow of American dollars to our enemy is a little like trying to swim up a water fall. This is mainly because we haven’t yet identified just who our enemy is. His Majesty al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah says that we are not at war with Islam. This is of course a-kin to saying that we were not at war with Nazism during the Second World War. I for one would like to know just who we are at war with, and with some degree of certainty.

Two months after the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, federal agents froze the assets of five Somali-related operations at three locations in Minneapolis because of suspicions that they were laundering money to Osama bin Laden or his terrorist organization Al-Qaida. In the end, we didn’t bother to indicate any of them.

Somali residents had bemoaned the shutdowns, saying that the businesses were their only way of getting money to impoverished relatives in Somalia. I can only imagine that some of these impoverished relatives are the Somali pirates that are hijacking our ships in the Gulf of Aden. We may have to revise the Marine Hymn to read “from the Halls of Montezuma to the shores of Som-al-i”

The search warrant executed at North American Money Transfer originated in the Eastern District of Missouri and was filed under seal on April 3. It states that FBI agents were seeking any documentation regarding money sent to "any person, business or entity where such transfers were destined for locations in: Somalia, Eritrea, Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and United Arab Emirates" between January 2007 and the present.

North American Money Transfer is based in Atlanta and has locations in Washington, Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri, Tennessee, Ohio, North Carolina, and Georgia. Its Mustaqbal Express location in the Village Market Mall is one of five Minnesota branches and it serves as the central headquarters for money sent from the other locations across the country.

Wednesday's raids come as local Somalis anxiously await the outcome of a federal investigation into the recruitment of young Somali men in the Twin Cities for terrorist training for here and abroad.

That probe became public in November after Shirwa Ahmed, a 27-year-old college student from Minneapolis, blew himself up in Somalia in an October attack killing up to 30 people.

Over the past few months, more than a dozen people within the Somali community of Minneapolis have been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury. On Wednesday, the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), another terrorist brotherhood organization, announced that it had sent letters to area Islamic controlled high schools, colleges, and universities asking that they provide legal support and assistance to Somali students who have been questioned on campus by FBI officials.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One by one, a step at a time, Islam will dominate the American culture just as they have been doing in Western Europe. Just has they did in Lebanon, just as they did in Indonesia, and in every African nation and every Middle Eastern Nation, just as they have done in every nation around the world that is now an Islamic State. It is inevitable? Yes. Because of this reason---

“If one continues to travel East, one is most certain not to reach the North Pole”...

Read your history book…

de Andréa

Al-Obama’s Nazi Youth Brigades

If you would like to know just what Obama was organizing as a communal organizer in Chicago then you really, really need to read this.

By de Andréa

If you are a regular reader of mine, you may recall an article I published on September 12, 2008 titled “Obama’s Muslim Terrorist Training Camp For Youth”. If not, read it and weep. In it, I predicted “Hitler-type Youth Brigades” if Obama was elected president. Well guess what? Here they are…

Please watch all the videos they are worth while. .

Secretly dubbed the 'GIVE ACT' which stands for (Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education), Obama is creating youth brigades across our country.

I can’t decide whether Obama is a Communist a Nazi or a Muslim. Maybe he is all three. One thing is certain, he is not an American. Let me know if you agree after you read this and watch the videos of the brainwashing of our children.

“Americorps” the American Nazi Youth Brigade
Supporters of an Americorps expansion plan pending in Congress laud its efforts to "leverage" federal dollars to boost state, local and other resources to "address national and local challenges," while critics say the fine print in H.R. 1388 secretly would create a Hitler-styled army of Nazi youth brigades or an organization modeled after Saul Alinsky's communist' Peoples youth Organization.'“ So which is it? Does it really matter?

In an era in which Congress can approve thousands of pages of legislation spending hundreds of billions of dollars without even reading the proposal, there seems to be no definitive answer on what some of the vague language of H.R. 1388 means.

But there is enough in the "GIVE ACT," now awaiting a conference committee in Congress after being approved by both the U.S. House and Senate, to cause its critics bones to shudder.

For example, it certainly imposes a requirement for public service on some people, even though its original much-feared study on mandatory service for all was moved to another bill during congressional debate.

The latest version includes a "National Service Reserve Corps" whose members have completed a "term of national service," "has successfully completed training" and "complete not less than 10 hours of volunteering each year."

It also raises First Amendment issues over its limitations on what various corps participants are allowed to do. Read the Bill It states, those in an "approved national service position" may not try to influence legislation, engage in protests or petitions, take positions on union organizing, , engage in partisan political activities, or, among other issues, be "engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization." In other words they lose all if their constitutional rights.

But probably the biggest red flag for many is how the proposal fits into the overall picture painted by President Obama when he described to a Colorado Springs audience a "National Civilian Security Force" that he wants as big and well-funded as the U.S. military – a staggering suggestion that would involve hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Of course what is not taken into account is the fact that Obama plans to nearly abolish the nation’s regular military in order to fund his own private “Youth Military”


WorldNetDDaily reported when the bill began its quick trip through Congress, and its original language called for a study of how best to implement a mandatory national service program for the youth of the United States.

Later the language was dropped from that bill, only to appear at the same time in another legislative proposal.

Everybody means the roughly seven million people called to public duty in the $6 billion National Service effort, But members pressed into the service of the one million-strong Youth Brigade, sanctioned by 'Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education (GIVE),' will have none of the freedoms of the community organizer who started it all.

There's no room for God in Obama's long promised Youth Brigade, not the Christian God anyway, no room to protest, petition, to boycott or to support a strike, and loopholes to give its mandatory membership a pass,. Obama's plan requires anyone receiving school loans, among others to serve at least three months as part of the brigade.

One section of the program is to introduce "service learning" as "a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency."

The plan suggests immediately raising the participation in such programs from 75,000 now to 250,000.

Gary Wood at Examiner.com said it's part of Obama's plan to set up national service. He noted the explanation offered by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel: "It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation, and community service." In other words forced into Obama’s youth brigade and indoctrinated into the new world government of Islam.

Gary Lester, writing at All American Blogger, put into words the worst fears of opponents. "Hitler knew that if you control the youth, you control the future. I wrote about him in 'The Threats to Homeschooling: From Hitler to the NEA.' As I noted in that article, Hitler said: 'The Youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled.'"

He cited the Hitler Youth's launch in the 1920s. In 1933, the participants totaled 100,000, and in 1939 the membership was compulsory for those over 17. Two years later, the membership was compulsory for those over 10, and it included 90 percent of the nation's youth.

He also cited concerns it would steer volunteers away from churches, politicize charity and focus on the "indoctrination" of participants.

"The legislation will, in many circumstances, force our children to participate in charitable activity as part of school – and that activity may well be chosen by or approved by a bureaucrat," he suggested.

At Washington Watch one forum participant warned, "Our republic is under attack as never before.” Said another, "This is social engineering at the very least, and could be the first step towards the reinstitution of slavery! Take heed, the New World Order (aka 'Change') draws nigh!"

When Obama delivered his Colorado Springs mandate and a copy of the speech provided online apparently was edited to exclude Obama's specific references to the new force.

Congress also is considering a "public service academy, a four-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders."

THE BOTTOM LINE: If his Highness the Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah from the House of Al-Obammah is going to create some kind of personal national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this a rather big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible and why is their candidate seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Could it be that His Highness wants a military that has been indoctrinated to perceive His Highness as god, a military powerful enough to control the conventional military?

Watch a video of Obama introducing this Nazi program

This also brings to mind Hitler’s private army, the Nazi SS…

As the presidential campaign advanced last year, other videos appeared that for many crystallized their concerns over such a "corps.” Watch the video It shows a squad of young men marching and shouting praises to Obama. Remember Hitler said: 'The Youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled.'" Watch a video of a school in Southern California already brainwashing the youngest children in America

If you are still not convinced then watch a couple more videos below and see if they ring any bells in your memory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS2rJP-udUs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSWt7hOYYLY&feature=related

All Hail the King Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah of the House of Al-Obammah the resurrected Twelfth Caliphate of the World Nation of Islam Yah-All.

No thanks, keep the change…

de Andréa

The New King of America

Just in case you haven’t met your king yet, I thought I would take this opportunity to introduce him to you. His name is King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al - Saud, from the house of Saud in Saudi Arabia, the custodian of the two most unholy Islamic terrorist Mosques in Mecca the most unholy city in the world. His name In Arabic: خادم الحرمين الشريفين الملك عبد الله بن عبد العزيز آل سعود‎ (You should probably learn Arabic soon)

By de Andréa

No! --- Our Muslim President Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah was not picking up his lost contact lenses or picking up his keys or a penny as Ben Franklin might do. No, he in fact was doing a full submissive bow from his waist to the waist of the king of Saudi Arabia, showing absolute and complete submission to his kingship of the Wahhabist Nation of Islam

If you haven’t seen the video yet, click here.

Now since there is absolutely no question about that, then I have a question for yah-all. Since our King Al-Barry was representing you and the rest of the citizens of America at the G20 Summit when he showed complete submission to his King, does this mean that Al-Obammah’s King, the King of Islam is also our King???

I have to tell yah, I haven’t been this ticked off since I was blown up by an old Mama-san pushing a baby carriage in Northern Laos, hoo-rah @#$%^&* yea, sort of like that yah-all.

If you missed my original article titled “Al-Obama Bows to His King” then please read it as well. Or read again!

As I said in the original article, it was a move described as a violation of protocol and not worthy of the office he holds. But of course that depends on just whose protocol Al-Barrack Hussein Al-Obammah believes takes precedence.

This exhibition of total submission to the king of Islam, and to the enemy of the ‘Free World’, is so telling and clearly shows where Al-Barry’s allegiance lies.

So far as I know, Obama is the only ‘Head of State’ in modern history or possibly any history to bow in submission to another ‘Head of State’ unless it was possibly in complete unconditional surrender in time of war. You don’t think…Naw he couldn’t have.

What with all the Muslims now in the White House, the FBI and in Home Insecurity, the next thing Al-Obammah may do would be to paint the ‘Dome Gold’ and invite the Ayatollah Khomeini to share his prayer rug. .

Moreover we may just see Michelle donning a Hijaab and holding mengaji readings for the neighborhood ladies in the east wing. Like I said, you might want to learn Arabic.

If anyone in the world cannot see that the Twelfth Caliphate of Islam Al-Barrack bin Hussein Al-Obammah of the house of Obammah is not a Communist Muslim then they have been totally deceived by the Islamic satanic spirit of the Taqiyyah. Besides, the man cannot even find his birth certificate.

If you say, well I need more proof, then proof is not what you need my friend. What you might need is an exorcist.

As I always say, if one continues on a road to the ‘East’ one is certain not to get to the ‘North Pole’.

You might want to get familiar with the new flag, of the United States of Islam.

I think while I wasn’t looking Islam must have taken over the world. Yes Israel too they have Muslims in their Parliament as well.

Didn’t you know that is their agenda???

As I said you really, really need to learn Arabic. You might want to join the mengaji with Michelle and the ladies in the east wing.

And don’t forget your Hijaab and oh! Your Quran

de Andréa

A New Threat

A Turkish Islamic Madrassa Fethullah Gulen has been infiltrating our charter schools with the blessings of U.S. Federal Courts

By de Andréa

For some time now I have been researching a Turkish-based Islamic movement that has developed a significant network here in the United States. Given Turkey’s recent history of secular, democratic government, and some of the remarks made by President Obama in his recent speech there, many of you may be surprised by what is going on.

I suspect that many who believe they are well-read on the issue of the Islamic agenda are unfamiliar with the Fethullah Gulen Community (FGC), movement here in America.

When you hear this on the 6:00 news, it will be too late to do anything about it. The ‘Alphabet Media’ are like police; in that, they show up after the crime has been committed.

A February 2009 article in the respected Jane's Islamic Affairs Analyst labeled “Turkey’s third power.” The article noted in its Key Points: “Turkey’s Islamist Gulen movement, while a powerful political force, is largely an unfamiliar entity to the West.”

The FGC is named after Fethullah Gulen, a Turkish imam who now lives in the United States. He fled Turkey in 1998 to avoid prosecution on charges that he was attempting to undermine Turkey’s secular government with the objective of establish an Islamic government, and now fully intends to carry on his agenda here in the US with the blessing of our federal courts. Since Gulen’s arrival here, the Department of Homeland Security tried to deport him, but he successfully fought the effort in federal court. It was ruled that he was an individual with “extraordinary ability in the field of education” – even though he has no formal educational training, which is a requirement in the field of education. ‘How deceived we are.’

The FGC organization emerged in Turkey in the 1970’s. According to the Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst piece, Gulen stated that “in order to reach the ideal Muslim society 'every method and path is acceptable, including lying [deceiving] to the people.’” This public acknowledgement of Taqiyyah (the deception to advance Islam) is highly pertinent to Gulen’s activities here in the United States.

Background on Gulen
A recent article in the Middle East Quarterly by Rachel Sharon-Kreskin titled “Fethullah Gulen’s Grand Ambition” sheds light on Gulen’s background:

Gülen was a student and follower of Sheikh Sa'id-i Kurdi (1878-1960), also known as Sa'id-i Nursi, the founder of the Islamist Nur (light) movement. After Turkey's war of independence, Kurdi demanded, in an address to the new parliament, that the new republic be based on Islamic principles. He turned against Atatürk and his reforms and against the new modern, secular, Western republic of Turkey.

Sharon-Kreskin documents how the FGC, in league with Turkey’s ruling party, Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi (AKP), has been successful in gradually moving Turkey away from its secular democratic government, towards an Islamist state governed by Shariah law, and reorienting itself toward Iran. What’s more, other evidence suggests that Gulen’s ultimate goal may well be the resurrection of the Ottoman Empire so as to reinstate the Islamic Caliphate. Clearly this has immensely serious ramifications for geo-political affairs in the Middle East as well as for the continued rise of radical Islam throughout the world.

What makes Gulen particularly dangerous is his strategic and tactical means to achieving this goal. He oversees a worldwide network of businesses, schools, foundations and media outlets, with an estimated budget of 25 billion dollars.

Here’s what Gulen had to say in a sermon in 1999 aired on Turkish television:
“You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria … like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it … You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey … Until that time, any step taken would be too early—like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all—in confidence … trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here—[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here. "

Simply put, he is brilliantly and patiently employing Taqiyyah on a global scale, because this strategic approach is not confined to Turkey. Here in the U.S. the FGC now runs over 90 charter public schools in at least 20 states. This was brought to my attention by someone who actually have relatives who teach in one of these schools. For obvious reasons I cannot reveal the identity of that source.

You may recall the numerous articles I have published regarding the operation of the Tarek ibn Zayed Academy (TiZA), a publicly funded charter school in Minnesota that is so blatantly Islamic in nature that the Minnesota Department of Education issued two citations against it and the ACLU is suing it, and yet it continues to operate unabated. FGC schools appear to be very different, and reflect the Gulen’s exhortation to “move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers…”

The fact that so little has been written about the FGC schools here in the U.S., as well as the accolades that have been accorded the FGC as a model of “moderation” by some of the many ignorant officials in our government, it would appear to confirm that the FGC and its schools are doing an excellent job of heeding Gulen’s exhortation and masking their true intent. ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’

Numerous Schools appear to be in violation of state law because the school’s affidavit for its charter does not acknowledge that it is connected with a religious institution or group. In other words, those who chartered this school practiced ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’ by hiding this fact. (Enterprising readers may want to research this with respect to FGC schools around the country. For a list of the FGC network in America and its schools, click here.

What’s more, the schools are a source of recruitment for outside school activities sponsored by the FGC, such as summer camps, which would be in keeping with the pattern of recruitment of members and followers that FGC employs worldwide, according to both the Jane’s and Middle East Quarterly articles.

As a further example of the use of ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’, the Jane’s article gives examples of how FGC’s Turkish language media outlet Zaman runs stories with information and headlines that are missing from the English language media outlet Today’s Zaman. This practice of two different messages, one to the indigenous Islamic population and one to the West, is common in the Islamic world, and has led many in the West, including political leaders and academics, to be misled as to the true intentions of Islam.

In building a sophisticated and well-funded worldwide network, including a substantial presence here in the U.S., Fethullah Gulen is following in the footsteps and exhortations of his Prophet Mohammed, who counseled ‘patience and deception’ as a means of overcoming the infidel when the power of the infidel was greater than the power of the umma, (Arabic for the Muslim world community). In a very real sense this is as or more sinister than the frontal assault strategy of Islamic organizations such as al Qaeda and Hamas, because, like the proverbial “boiling of the frog,” we are incrementally “boiled alive” without realizing it.

For years I have been ringing the alarm bells about what is variously known as “cultural stealth jihad,” and the “surreptitious Shariah law,” being imposed on us without so much as a clue. Much of Europe and Great Britain has been Islamized through this process, a process that invariably does not lead to peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims, but leads to Islamic self-segregation, increased Islamist militancy, and aggression, and the eventual forced imposition of Islamic Shariah law within the society. This is how all presently Islamic countries have come under the control of the ‘Nation of Islam’.

The FGC charter schools in America may outwardly appear innocuous, but they are serving a greater and long-range objective of Fethullah Gulen. We in the West need to be less gullible and more discerning when it comes to the elements of “Stealth Cultural Jihad” in our Country.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This is even more dangerous than the blatantly Islamic Tarek ibn Zayed Academy (TIZA) charter school in Minnesota, that I have previously written so much about, this is because of its use of the very powerful deception of Islam, the ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’. This very large and ever growing Islamic organization has only one mission, the agenda of Islam to infiltrate and take over America to destroy it from within. This scenario has been repeated throughout history, as an extremely effective tool to control the culture of a country and to ultimately take it over.

They surreptitiously and incrementally weave a web throughout every aspect of our culture, the educational system, governments both State and Federal, and our courts, they get into the minds of our children as a utopian peaceful philophy. Moreover, when and if we recognize it, it will be because they have already begun to pull the string to tighten the noose around our necks. The Sharia law that has been stealthily put into place will now be enforced.

If you don’t believe this is happing, then my friend you are a victim of ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’, the supernatural deception Islam. You see it has already been done, in every country in the world that is now under the control of Islam. It is now happening through Europe and it is happening right here in America. As I said previously, it is just a repeat of history.

Our President recently said: “We are not at war with Islam” this, my friend, is why we will loose.

de Andréa

We Appreciate Islam

So says Obama…The rest of the story that went on after the G-20 Summit.
Obama’s plan is all coming together…

By de Andréa

After bowing down to the king of Saudi Arabia and apologizing again for America at the recent G-20 Summit in London, president Obama attended the Islamic terrorist Alliance of Civilizations summit in turkey, a conference that ‘seeks ‘Islamic Sharia interests' the interests of our enemy and the enemy of the ‘Free World’. In a speech there he made a commendable effort to “connect” with the terrorist Islamic world, but in-so-doing he went perilously too far by saying things that simply are not accurate and thus should not have been said.

For example: Obama said: "We convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many centuries to shape the world for the better..." For the better he says...I would really like to know just exactly what Islam has done for the better Al-Obama.

Excuse me while I throw up!!! Thank you I’m back…

[Read a WorldNetDaily reoprt of the G-20 Summit We just lost our national sovereginty]

Just as Obama represented the American people when he bowed down in submission to the king of Saudi Arabia, he says ”We” convey “our” deep appreciation for the Islamic faith… again as a reprehensive of the American people. While I totally understand Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah’s personal “deep appreciation for the Islamic faith,” and while I of course cannot speak for you, but I, myself have no appreciation or respect for the Islamic faith whatsoever, deep or otherwise. Furthermore this Muslim Communist President does not represent me in any way. He in fact represents Islam ‘the enemy of humanity and the free world’.

On the other hand, I can certainly understand why Obama would not want to tell the truth and say, “1,400 years of the Islamic agenda has resulted in 270 million murders, and countless millions enslaved.” Such history hardly qualifies Islam as “shaping the world for the better,” moreover; he would have been better advised to simply not make such a historically inaccurate and unsupportable statement.

Obama also said that he wants to “strengthen Ataturk's vision of democratic Turkey.” Either Obama doesn’t know his history or he is lying through his Muslim teeth. What Mr. Obama needs to do is to tell the truth and say to the Muslim world what Ataturk’s vision really was --- a vision which ended the Islamic Empire in 1924, he rebelled against Islam and its Sharia law, and gave women rights, as well as the right to vote, to get an education, to work, etc. It was Ataturk's vision that put the last nail in the coffin of the Islamic empire, ending centuries of murder, mayhem, and terrorism. It was because of Ataturk's action that the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt five years later, to reclaim and revive the Islamic Empire and set the course for present-day Islamic Jihad. The Muslim Brotherhood is now the oldest and largest terrorist organization in the world, boasting 70 offshoots including Al-Qaida, and CAIR and our President not only supports it but bows down and summits to it.

Obama also eloquently stated that “America is not at war with Islam”. If America is not at war with Islam I would sure like to have him tell me just exactly whom we are at war with…? Moreover, someone should advise him that Islam is at war with America. (But then he already knows that doesn’t he?) If he could possibly tell the truth (which is not possible for a Muslim) he would have to say: "Today we are all challenged by Islamic Jihad that has declared war, not only on America but on the entire ‘Western Culture’ the ideology of political Islamic ideology, threatens the entire world.

Meanwhile, North Korea conducts another missile launch, which has enormous ramifications for the world’s ability to defeat the Nation of Islam (that Obama says we are not at war with) North Korea is doing more than manufacture nuclear weapons for itself. North Korea's business is selling arms technology to the cash-rich Arab nations who provide it with the cash it so desperately needs. A few years ago North Korea supplied Syria with the nuclear reactor that Israel bombed in September 2007. North Korean engineers were killed and many injured at the Syrian facility during the Israeli bombing. Thanks to Israel the West still exists.

On another Islamist front Iran is clearly set on attacking Israel and America. Iran is very interested in buying North Korean missile technology which they can then deliver an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) read what Newt Gingrich has to say about EMP attack against America with one bomb. So while North Korea may not attack us directly, its technology is what our die-hard enemies are going to use to destroy us.

The United Nations has proven to be virtually impotent in dealing with such serious issues. Saddam Hussein ignored UN sanctions, North Korea ignores the UN, and Iran marches on, ignoring everyone. The United States needs to take a bold step to disrupt the “nuclear proliferation axis” that exists between North Korea and the militant nations of the Islamic world. But instead president Obama OK’s Iran’s ‘Nuclear Program

’We can and should go directly to China and ask them how would they feel if we made nuclear missile technology available to Japan and Taiwan? We can exert great pressure on China in this area because those two nations are a major threat to China if we make our technology available to them. This would give China a vested interest in pressuring North Korea to stop their missile program. What we are concerned about right now is the political victory that North Korea has achieved with this launch. Even though this was not a military victory because the launch was not successful to the point they expected, it achieved a political victory against America. We should have shot it down. It would have reversed the victory.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Just as we had in the 1980’s and 90’s, America is again establishing a clear track record of “non-response’ and look where that got us. In 2006 Kaddafi, who signed an agreement in 2003 to get rid of his 30 tons of mustard gas, reneged on the contract and changed his mind after watching America's lack of decisive action against Iran. North Korea is extremely dangerous because its missiles could carry a nuclear warhead to America and it will continue to provide the technology to other nations wanting to harm America. In other words, the nuclear threat to America and the West will continue to escalate beyond North Korea to Islamist regimes unless we bring it to a screeching halt.

But Obammah says: NO!

Incedentally, he knows that talking to Muslims changes nothing.

Do you still not believe he is a Muslim??? Let me help you understand something, when you finely recognize this, it will be too late.

Since our government refuses to do its job of protecting America, are you prepared to protect your family?

Let me ask you this…do you have any missiles???

The clock is ticking ever closer to the midnight hour…

de Andréa .

A Single Nuke Could Destroy America

Sunday, March 29, 2009 4:23 PM
By: Newt Gingrich and William Forstchen

Dear de Andrea

The issue of Iran launching a nuclear warhead over America that would then trigger an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). Numerous actions and overtures by President Obama and his administration has signaled weakness and capitulation to the Iranian mullahs and President Ahmadinejad and are dramatically elevating the concern we have regarding the likelihood of such an attack.

Does anyone seriously believe that those Iranian mullahs who are now following in the footsteps of the Ayatollah Khomeini will hesitate to use a nuclear weapon against America, especially one that would create the widespread devastation an EMP would create?

Given that many sources now estimate Iran will have enough enriched uranium within a year to make a nuclear weapon, the clock is ticking dangerously close to midnight.

In spite of this, the Obama administration is taking various actions demonstrating weakness in the face of this Iranian march to nuclear capability, such as: Obama’s interview with al-Arabiya in which he criticized America for the tensions with the Muslim world. And Obama’s recent message to the Iranian mullahs, which were certainly perceived by them as appeasement and capitulation.

The administration indicates that missile defense capability will be downgraded. Large, painful cuts in defense spending, as noted by Senator Carl Levin, and then the homeland Security director downgrading Islamist terrorism to the new politically correct “man-caused disasters.”

Then we have the nomination of Harold Koh to be legal counsel to the State Department. Koh’s outrageous views include a statement made in 2007 in which he said “he didn't see any reason why Shariah law would not be an acceptable application to govern cases in the United States.”

The pattern here is disturbingly clear. We don’t have to speculate as to what the results of this approach to Muslim “outreach” will be – Western Europe and the UK have been employing it for decades, and the result has been more Islamist militancy, more Islamist demands, and an increase in terror threats, moreover it will not stop.

But now, as we are staring at the prospect of a nuclear-triggered EMP, the stakes are higher than they have ever been. A sword of Damocles hangs over our heads. It is a real threat that has been all but ignored.

On Feb. 3, Iran launched a “communications satellite” into orbit. At this very moment, North Korea is threatening to do the same. [since this e-mail was writtin North Korea has launched its rocket] The ability to launch an alleged communications satellite belies a far more frightening truth. A rocket that can carry a satellite into orbit can also drop a nuclear warhead over any location on the planet in less than 45 minutes.

Far too many timid or uninformed sources maintain that a single launch of a missile poses no true threat to the United States, given our retaliatory power. A reality check is in order and must be discussed in response to such an absurd claim: In fact, one small nuclear weapon, delivered by an ICBM can destroy the United States by maximizing the effect of the resultant electromagnetic pulse upon detonation.

An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is a byproduct of detonating an atomic bomb above the Earth’s atmosphere. When a nuclear weapon is detonated in space, the gamma rays emitted trigger a massive electrical disturbance in the upper atmosphere. Moving at the speed of light, this overload will short out all electrical equipment, power grids, and delicate electronics on the Earth’s surface. In fact, it would take only one to three weapons exploding above the continental United States to wipe out our entire grid and transportation network. It might take years to recover from, if ever.

This is not science fiction. If you doubt this, spend a short amount of time skimming the Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack from April 2008. You will come away sobered.

Even now, as the new administration plans to spend trillions on economic bailouts, it has announced plans to reduce funding and downgrade efforts for missile defense. Furthermore, the United States’ reluctance to invest in a modern and credible traditional nuclear deterrent is a serious concern. What good is a bailout, if there is no longer a nation to bail out? Fifty years ago, it was not Sputnik itself that sent a dire chill of warning around the world; it was the capability of the rocket that launched Sputnik. The rocket that lofted Sputnik into orbit also served as Russian ICBM.

Yet for all its rhetoric, the Soviet Union was essentially a rational power that recognized the threat of mutual destruction and thus never stepped to the edge. But this deterrent no longer exists.

The world is different today. We face an enemy that worships death and destruction, even their own. Intercontinental range missiles tipped with nuclear weapons in the hands of leaders driven by fanaticism, leaders that support global terrorism, leaders that have made repeated threats that they will seek our annihilation . . . will now at last be able to achieve that dream in a matter of minutes.

Those who claim that there is little to fear from Iran or North Korea because “at best” they will have only one or two nuclear weapons ignore the catastrophic level of threat we now face from just “a couple” of nuclear weapons.

Again: One to three missiles tipped with nuclear weapons and armed to detonate at a high altitude — to achieve the strongest EMP over the greatest area of the United States — would create an EMP “overlay” that triggers a continental-wide collapse of our entire electrical, transportation, and communications infrastructure.

Within weeks after such an attack, tens of millions of Americans would perish. The impact has been likened to a nationwide Hurricane Katrina. Some studies estimate that 90 percent of all Americans might very well die in the year after such an attack as our transportation, food distribution, communications, public safety, law enforcement, and medical infrastructures collapse.

We most likely would never recover from the blow:

Two things need to be done now and without delay:

1. Make it clear in the strongest of terms that, if either Iran or North Korea launches a rocket on a trajectory headed toward the territory of the United States, we will shoot it down. The risk of not doing so is beyond acceptable. And if they construe this as an act of war, so be it, for they fired the first shot. The risk of sitting back for 30 minutes and praying it is not an EMP strike is beyond acceptable, beyond rational on our part. One might think that this goes without saying, but it doesn’t. This administration has taken a more diplomatic wait and see approach.

2. Funding for EMP defense must be a top national priority. To downgrade or halt our missile defense program, which at last is becoming viable after 25 years of research, would be an action of criminal negligence. But Obama said we are going to downgrade our missile defense program. Surely, with such a threat confronting us, a fair and open debate, with full public access and the setting aside of partisan politics, is in order. In the meantime, a policy must be stated today that we will indeed shoot down any missile aimed towards the United States that is fired by Iran or North Korea.

America’s survival, your survival, and your family’s survival might very well depend on it.

Newt

The New Socialist Republik of Amerika

The new Global Nation of Islam now has its foundation

By de Andréa

Even though I knew this was ultimately inevitable, I just never thought I would see this happen in my lifetime. Soon, with an executive order, your president, Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah, will notify the Federal Reserve Board and other regulators to answer to the ‘Financial Stability Board’, a body of central bankers from each of the G-20 states and the European Union. Socialism is now under way in the United States. How do I know this? A little fly told me, it attended the G-20 Summit.

If you don’t believe Obama is a Marxist Socialist, then please let me ask you a question. Have you ever heard anywhere in the history of a free America, a President of the United States firing a top executive or anyone in a major corporation. And if that is not enough, have you ever heard of the federal government buying automobiles, using taxpayer’s money for those that may have lost their jobs. Well that has already happened, Obama fired GM’s CEO and hired someone more to his liking as well as providing a guarantee that if you buy a GM car and loose your job that the rest of us wage earners will make the payments for you, for 10 months and then we will buy the car back if necessary. Aren’t we generous? Well not really, you don’t have a choice. NO --- I mean soon you will not have a right to choose anything anymore.

Please don’t fall asleep on me now…
On April 2, 2009, the work that was started on July 4, 1776 was destroyed in a nanosecond at a meeting of the G-20 in London. We are just a step away from Marxism.

By the time you hear this on the 6:00 News it will have already happened.

In case you might wonder just what went on behind closed doors at the G-20 Summit in London this past week, then this is for you.

A joint communiqué essentially announced a global economic union with uniform regulations and bylaws for all nations, including the United States. Henceforth, our SEC, Commodities Trading Commission, Federal Reserve Board, and other regulators will have to submit to dictates of the Financial Stability Board, the (FSB), a body of central bankers from each of the G-20 states and the European Union.

The mandate that Obama has agreed to is extraordinary in its scope and open-endedness. It is to create a framework of internationally agreed high standards that a global financial system requires.

These standards are to include the extension of regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments, and markets [including] systemically important hedge funds.

The key word here is "all.” If the FSB, in its international wisdom, considers an institution or company "systemically important," it will regulate and over see it. This provision extends and internationalizes all the proposals of the Obama administration to regulate firms, in whatever sector of the economy that it deems to be for example "too big to fail."

The FSB will also rule over the "implementation of . . . tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms."

That means that the FSB will regulate how much executives are to be paid and will enforce its idea of corporate social responsibility at "all firms."

Folks this is right out of Karl Marx…

In his first 100 days Obama has accomplished more toward the implementation of Socialism in America that all the Elitists Communists Socialists would have dreamed of in 200 years.

How much will this communist government allow you to earn…
The head of the Financial Stability Forum, the precursor to the new global FSB, is Mario Draghi, Italy's central bank president. In a speech on Feb. 21, 2009, he gave us clues to his thinking. He noted that "the progress we have made in revising the global regulatory framework . . . would have been unthinkable just months ago."

He said that "every financial institution capable of creating systemic risk will be subject to supervision." He adds that "it is envisioned that, at an international level, the governance of financial institutions, executive compensation, and the special duties of intermediaries to protect retail investors will be subject to explicit supervision."

This "coordination of the national agencies" and the "setting of standards is an explicit statement of the mandate the FSB will have over our national regulatory agencies".

Now we may no longer look to presidential appointees, con