Saturday, February 28, 2015

Historical Revisionism

Historical Revisionism
What is it, and does it really matter, as long as it says what you want it to say?

By de Andréa
February 28, 2015

The interesting thing about History is that absolutely nothing in the present or the future makes any sense, or can be understood unless one has a history.

Sir Winston Churchill once said: “The further back one looks, the further forward one can see.”  While that statement is true, it is not the whole’ truth.  The rest of the truth is if one doesn’t look back, one can’t see anything at all, or more importantly, will not understand it…’at all’. 

Think about what a newborn baby understands… NOTHING.  Why?  Because he/she has no history.  History is how we see and understand the world around us in the present.  It tells us how we got to where we are, and even who and what we are.

Why do you see a photo of Adam and Eve?  Because it is our history and without it, nothing else makes any sense.

Now what if someone changes all of history? Revises it.  Then my friend, one will understand a lie, and can thusly be manipulated.

Today for example, modern revisionists have left a few words out of the Mayflower Compact.  Just below my friend, is what most schools are now indoctrinating your children with, if they even teach it at all. 

The new and improved Mayflower Compact:
“We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the people, etc.
Having undertaken, for the honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.
In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, 1620.”
So what is the difference in the original Mayflower Compact? it for yourself:
In ye name of God Amen· We whose names are vnderwriten, the loyall subjects of our dread soueraigne Lord King James by ye grace of God, of great Britaine, franc, & Ireland king, defender of ye faith, &c.

Haueing vndertaken, for ye glorie of God, and aduancemente of ye christian ^faith and honour of our king & countrie, a voyage to plant ye first colonie in ye Northerne parts of Virginia· doe by these presents solemnly & mutualy in ye presence of God, and one of another, couenant, & combine our selues togeather into a ciuill body politick; for ye our better ordering, & preseruation & furtherance of ye ends aforesaid; and by vertue hearof, to  enacte, constitute, and frame shuch just & equall lawes, ordinances, Acts, constitutions, & offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meete & conuenient for ye generall good of ye colonie:  vnto which we promise all due submission and obedience.

In witnes wherof we haue herevnder subscribed our names at Cap Codd ye ·11· of Nouember, in ye year of ye raigne of our soueraigne Lord king James of England, france, & Ireland ye eighteenth and of Scotland ye fiftie fourth. Ano: Dom ·1620·|

Aside from the old English language, if you said they left God out of the document, you would be correct. Does it make any difference?  Well yes! It eliminates the purpose, of not only the document, but the whole reason for the people coming here. They came here as a church,”Haueing vndertaken, for ye glorie of God, and aduancemente of ye christian faith…”  So, it changes history therefore it changes the purpose of the present and the future.

So what is the result? The result is the loss of the understanding of truth. One will no longer understand why the pilgrims came here, and why they risked their lives to do so. It changes the path of the future completely.  But more importantly by eliminating the purpose of history we cannot possibly understand the purpose of man! Yes I am talking about the age old profound question of “Why am I here”.  One only needs to look at history, my friend.   

George Orwell said: “He who controls the past, controls the future.”  And if that doesn’t impress you then listen to what Karl Marx said:  “a people without a heritage are easily persuaded.”   Ant then, he changed history and the future of Russia!  Even yet today, the common Russian on the street, knows little to nothing about their own history or of the rest of the world.

So what if ones past is revised?  It becomes a lie. It is void, and there is no understanding of truth.  So what does that say about the present, and more importantly the future, since the present is but a nanosecond?  You would understand whatever the revisionist wanted you to understand.  This is why the Soviet Union and the Nazi governments both took over the education of its citizens.  So they could control the future. 

Oh! I guess I left out the U.S. Government…and their Department of Indoctrination/education, Communist Core etc. To standardize the education in America.  Common, or Communist Core is the conduit to revisionism.  The curriculum seeks to rewrite history, “to simplify it” they say.  What they don’t say is that the purpose is to create a nation of ‘robotic simpletons’ who know only what the elitists have programed them with. 

THE BOTTOM LINE: If I can change your historical context, through indoctrinational education, and the brainwashing media, then I can change the way you view the present and the future.  In the future for example, your children and children’s children may have no understanding of Freedom at all.

In today’s world my friend, believe nothing you are taught in government schools and even less of what you hear through the mind altering conduit of the alphabet soup mainstream controlled communist Media… Take the time to do the research yourself.

Tomorrow I will give you another example of Historical Revisionism.   

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Friday, February 27, 2015

Why Not Just Ban Everything?

Why Not Just Ban Everything?
This would promote tyranny and make criminals of us all.

By de Andréa
February 27, 2015


First soda pop larger than 4 oz.  Now New York State moves to ban all knives and swords with a blade length longer than 4 inches.  I’m sorry my religion demands that I sell my clothes and buy a sword, and drink tall sodas, so I answer to a higher authority. [Be]sides my Constitution says that I have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn’t specify what kind of arms or weapons.

This kind of vomitus legislation is what supports my theory that if a society just makes enough laws then we will all eventually be criminals and subject to arrest.  Isn’t this the delineation of tyranny?

People joked as the Obama administration and a communist-controlled Senate tried to push through sweeping gun confiscation laws two years ago, asking, "What will be next? Are we going to ban knives?" Well, it's not a joke anymore. The State of New York is looking to ban all really big knives. We call some of them machetes.

New York State Senator Tony Avella (D-Queens), the senator that effectively pushed through the unlawful anti-American SAFE Act in 2013 is now taking aim on machetes. "The fact that anyone can easily purchase this potentially lethal tool is just crazy," he said.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Said -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)

Is it really crazy to want to purchase an inexpensive tool that was designed to help clear out a path in the woods?

New York has already banned smaller knives and listed them as deadly weapons. According to an administrative code violation, New Yorkers carrying a knife with a blade longer than 4 inches can already face up to 15 days in jail and up to a $300 fine.  This would effectively ban all sharp objects, knives or swords larger than 4 inches.  I guess a four inch knife can’t hurt or kill you even though your heart is less than four inches deep in your chest. I think the limit should be less than an 1/8th  of an inch that way one could barely scratch themselves.   

The New York Daily News gave two examples of people who were killed with machetes. The mother of one of the victims is apparently not living full time on planet earth as she said, "I didn't even know it was possible to buy a machete online. I had no idea that it wasn't considered a deadly weapon. It should be."

Seriously? So, let me get this straight, something is a "deadly weapon" if it can’ be used to kill or hurt someone? OK, any of our Special Ops veterans out there want to communicate to my world audience just what kinds of things you can "improvise" should you find yourself without a knife or, look at this, a gun? It’s a beautiful thing!

Let me illustrate. A Muslim jihadist attacked two police officers in New York with a hatchet. Should hatchets  then be considered deadly weapons because Obama’s fellow jihadists use them for a purpose they were not intended for? Hey! I want to be armed at least as good as the Muslims that are bent on murdering me.

How about a pencil or pen? Has no one seen the tactical pens that can be used for self-defense? If they can be used rightly by law abiding citizens, then can they not also be used wrongly by criminals? Of course!

What about baseball bats? Have people not been killed with baseball bats? I'm guessing a sports-crazed culture would have a real problem with banning baseball bats.

How about the automobile? How many people have intentionally, not accidentally, used their car as a weapon against another person? Are we really going to go down that road (no pun intended)?

The machete is viewed in New York the same as a meat cleaver. Is there anyone out there who is honestly going to stand up and say they haven't heard of a murder involving a meat cleaver? Will that also be on Senator Avella's agenda? I'm just wanting to see if he will be consistent.

How about – screwdrivers, chainsaws, and drills, (which are used by terrorists) hammers, crowbars, ball bearings, rocks, bricks, stepping-stones, bottles of a certain size and weight, pitchforks, sharp sticks, heavy lamp stands, large tool files, the point is, (pun intended) that I’ll bet anyone of you could go into any hardware store and come out with a whole shopping cart full of potentially sharp weapons that are sold every day. Should we then ban hardware stores?  Ridiculous you say? I agree.  We should probably begin by punishing criminals instead of law abiding citizens.

I think this proves my point that these kind of laws are not for preventing crime they are for preventing freedom.   

The problem in our culture today is that we have abandoned dealing justly and swiftly with criminals. We have pampered and coddled them, we have blamed the cop for trying to arrest them.  We have done everything except follow the Law of God in dealing with them. As a result, victims are forced to pay for the housing, clothing and feeding of those who committed crimes against them or their loved ones and instead of placing the blame on the criminal, we place it on inanimate objects, tools etc. That is exactly what these kinds of "laws" do. They criminalize a tool, which then makes criminals of law-abiding citizens for owning them.  The real criminals like Senator Tony Avella are free to make it a crime to be an American.  You commit murder, you die, simple as that.

If signed into law, this would make yet another normal, useful tool illegal to own and would criminalize owners, landing them in jail for years. As I've asked in previous articles, does this sound like justice? Or…does it smell like tyranny?

THE BOTTOM LINE: As for people like Senator Avella, why don't you just propose that everyone be forced into their own private bubble, unable to get their hands on anything tangible? Why not ban everything? That would be a more honest tyrannical approach.


I would like to propose that we ban Nazis like Senator Avella…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Put Me In Charge, She Says!

Put Me In Charge, She Says!
An absolute must read…this is good!

By de Andréa
February 26, 2015

This was sent to me in an email by one of my subscribers, it was apparently found in the
Waco Tribune Herald, in Waco, Texas.

Maybe I have under estimated some young folks, or this gal must have had very informed parents and grew up to be this cognizant of reality. 

Written by a 21 yr. old Texas female who gets it. She gets the difference between a Communist Social Welfare State that we have become, and a Free Capitalistic (carry your own weight) Economy that we once were.  It's her future she's concerned about and this is how she feels about this social welfare Big Government State that s been foisted upon her! These solutions of hers are just common sense in her opinion, and in mine as well…


Said like a true American. 

“Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a 60”plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices! The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct! For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a government welfare check! If you want to vote, then get a job.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:... I have nothing to add except, this gal has said it all, and said it well.  I hope she runs for office…soon!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Illinois Concealed Carry Results Are In

Illinois Concealed Carry Results Are In
As in every case, in every place…more guns, less crime! Another truth telling story about the American Constitution.

By de Andréa
February 16, 2015

After a long legal battle, in 2014 the state of Illinois passed legislation allowing citizens to legally carry concealed firearms. In other words the state of Illinois, finally, after 238 years has recognized…well, at least partially recognized, the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution.

No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves. John Jay, First chief justice US Supreme Court.

Every gun law in America is unconstitutional and therefore illegal.  Yes I said every gun law is illegal! 

The complete uncensored Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Did you read that?  No don’t skip this…DID YOU READ THAT?  The part that said SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.  That means no one can make a law that even smells like it might restrict the right of any American to keep and or bear arms.  Don’t like it? Tuff…then change the law, don’t violate it.

That being said…
Since March of 2014, the state of Illinois has issued approximately 91,000 concealed carry permits. Oh no! Say it isn’t so.

Anti-American, anti-Constitutionalists feared the new law would lead to increased crime, but now, with less than one year of experience behind them, state officials are surprised,(surprise, surprise) saying their fears were unfounded.   OMG these people are clueless, it’s a wonder they don’t step on their own tongues.

“I really wasn’t sure on expectations, but I do think that it’s probably worked out better than some people thought it would,” McLean County Sheriff Joe Sandage told the Bloomington Pantagraph.
“We haven’t seen any abuses of (the law) or people carrying into places where they’re not allowed to,” Sandage continued, adding that “by and large, the people getting concealed-carry permits are responsible gun owners, and they’re going to follow the law as it’s written.  …Legalization has not caused the mass chaos we thought it would”, according to Decatur Police Chief Brad Sweeney.  “It’s been such a non-event,” Sweeney told the Pantagraph, adding that the possibility that Illinois would devolve into the “wild, wild west” did enter his mind.  “We were worried these firearms may start to turn up in cases, but I could not find any report of an incident all of last year.”
Sandage’s and Sweeney’s assessments match those of other top cops in the state.
 “For us, it’s been a non-event,” Champaign police deputy chief Joe Gallo told The (Champaign-Urbana) News-Gazette earlier this month.
“I think people were so concerned about it in the beginning, because there was a lot of media hype and speculation,” Urbana Police Chief Patrick Connolly told The News-Gazette.  “But quite honestly, we have often said the people who are law-abiding and take the time to go to class and register and understand the concept, hopefully, are going to be smart enough to handle the firearm appropriately. So, I don’t think this was something out of the ordinary.”
Illinois’ concealed carry law requires permit holders to undergo a background check and 16 hours of training.
“When you’re talking concealed-carry, it’s mostly your law-abiding citizens, who don’t cause problems anyway,” Danville police Sgt. Josh Campbell told the paper.
The observations of law enforcement officials on the ground are in contrast to the predictions made by politicians such as Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and former Governor Pat Quin.
Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy also opposed concealed carry. Last January, after the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the state’s ban on concealed carry was unconstitutional, he said:  “When people say concealed carry, I say Trayvon Martin. The answer to guns is not more guns, and just simply putting guns in people’s hands is going to lead to more tragedy.”
THE BOTTOM LINE:  Well he was also wrong, wrong, and wrong.  According to the Chicago Tribune, Illinois homicides actually fell from 419 in 2013 to 407 last year.  And that was in less than one year when the Homicide rate was on the up tic.   Now, you just wait until the FBI report that no one pays any attention to, comes out showing another significant drop in the overall violent crime rate in the state.  The more the crime rate drops the less attention will be paid to it, because we sure do not want to solve the violent crime problem, what we do want is to get rid of guns.
FYI, the State of Vermont doesn’t have even one gun law. Anyone federally legal to possess a gun, can carry it loaded concealed or open carry right down main street Vermont.  But here is the part, as I said, no one pays any attention to, and that is, according to the FBI stat’s, Vermont has among the lowest per capita violent crime rates in the Nation.  Arizona and Alaska have had similar results.  Moreover, after Hiller v’s Washington DC Supreme Court decision to abolish their gun ban, Washington DC, almost overnight, lost its status of being the murder capital of the world.  The city of Chicago is soon to capture that prestigious award with their virtual gun ban.   You want more gun murders…then ban guns! S
Folks!  Anytime a legislature violates Constitutional law we are in trouble.  Unlike today’s so-called leaders who haven’t a clue as to what they are doing, the Constitutional architects knew exactly what they were doing.  The right to keep and bear arms is for the “Security of a Free State”, when are these ignorant dummies going to get it?

Jesus Christ Himself said “sell your cloths, buy a sword.” Why?

For your safety my friend, for your safety!

My country’s Constitution says I should be armed, My God said I should be armed…I don’t about you, but I’m going to be armed…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Obama Leaks Top Secret Plan

Obama Leaks Top Secret Plan to ISIS for Taking Back Mosul Iraq

By de Andréa
February 22, 2015

ISIS captured Mosul, Iraq, in June 2014
The top secret briefing attended by media outlets was given on condition that the top administration official would not be identified.
The United States Pentagon has laid out a battle plan to retake the Iraqi city of Mosul in an April-to-May time frame, using some 20,000 to 25,000 Iraqi troops who currently are being trained. An intelligence source who said, also on condition that his identity not be revealed, this is a highly unusual disclosure/leak that is “pure lunacy.”
In a teleconference with reporters at the Pentagon, a U.S. Central Command official said brigades of Iraqis along with Kurdish peshmerga forces and Sunni militia will seek to take back Iraq’s second largest city from ISIS, which has held it since June.
The disclosure surprised many who wondered why details would be released months ahead of the planned offensive.
The source referred to previous disclosures in advance of an attack that gave enemy forces in Iraq time to set up improvised explosive devices, IED’s.
The Pentagon briefer said that all training and equipping of Iraqi forces now under way will be for taking back Mosul. He said that some six brigades of equipment are now in place in preparation for the expected Mosul offensive in April or May.
In preparation for the Mosul operation, the briefer said the U.S. will provide the “full range of military options that we have given [the Iraqis] and continue to give them every day from the training and equipping and the logistical support we help them with, the air support, the intel, the ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) – that full range and complement that we have been doing now that has proven very successful when we have the ability to plan, rehearse side-by-side and then execute have been deemed successful.”
The Central Command official said the military campaign against ISIS “remains on track.” He said the ISIS advance, especially in Iraq, was “generally holding as we had planned.”
As for ISIS’ takeover of the city of al-Baghdadi last week, the briefer said in the “operational sense” ISIS is in a defensive mode, but it doesn’t mean that ISIS cannot conduct “limited and/or isolated offensive operations.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: This my friend isn’t the first time that Obama has purposely leaked a planned attack on Islamic Jihadist. He seems to do this on a regular bases, and to me, while it is obviously treason in time of war, it isn’t surprising.  If we would have had a Nazi as president in the Second World War, he would have certainly leaked the D-DAY invasion to Hitler.  Obama is a bloody Muslim Jihadist just as Rudy Giuliani said he is…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Obama Does Business with a Terrorist Group

Obama Does Business with a Terrorist Group, The Muslim Brotherhood

By de Andréa
February 23, 2015

Rudy had it exactly right.  GO RUDY!
While Egypt got some sense in their heads nearly two years ago, ousted Mohamed Morsi as president  dissolved the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party in Egypt and declared them a terrorist group, Obama, a member of the Brotherhood on the other hand, continues to cover for Islam and do business with America's enemies. In fact, he says he is quite "comfortable" doing business with the well-known Islamic terrorist group, the revived Ottoman Empire known as -THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.
and later
Come on! When are we going to put this guy in Gitmo?
One day after the brutal fire murder of a Jordanian pilot by the Islamic State, Barack Obama met with Muslim Brotherhood members at the White House. The press was banned of course.
My friends, we are not talking about just hob-knobbing with our enemies here. We are talking about aiding and abetting America's enemies. That's Constitutionally called Treason.  Oh yeah! I forgot, we are in the process of exchanging our Constitution for our enemies Islamic Sharia law.
When are we going to arrest this Muslim Jihadist Obama, send him to Gitmo and throw the key away???
To make matters worse, the Obama State Department lied about the Muslim Brotherhood leaders "organizing and funding" Georgetown University, a once Christian College. (There are several sourced articles in the link, read them)
According to Adam Kredo at the Washington Free Beacon, Georgetown denied those claims when contacted by WFB.
Of course, the meeting did nothing to help relations with the Egyptian government, who has gone on record designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group.
Kredo reported what happened when State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki continued to defend the State Department's schmoozing of the Muslim Brotherhood.
"Unfortunately, I didn't have the accurate information on one small piece. The meeting was set up by the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, a nonprofit. So the visit was not funded, as you know, by us or the U.S. Government, but it was also not funded by Georgetown," Psaki said.
He then went on to report what happened next:
When asked by a reporter "if there's been any rethink in—within the building about the appropriateness of this visit, considering what happened afterwards and the photographs that some of the participants took," Psaki responded, "No."
While at the State Department last week, one member of the delegation, a Brotherhood-aligned judge in Egypt, posed for a picture in which he held up the Islamic group's notorious four-finger Rabia symbol, according to his Facebook page.
Psaki went on to say that the Obama administration remains comfortable entertaining the Brotherhood. Well of course he does, he is a member in good standing.
"Are you—is the building comfortable with continuing to do business with this center, this group?" a reporter asked.
"Yes. Yes," Psaki responded.
Investors Business Daily reported names some of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in attendance:
Imam Mohamed Magid, who preaches at a fundamentalist Northern Virginia mosque that has listed a number of trustees and major donors whose offices and homes were raided after 9/11 by federal agents on suspicion of funding terrorists.
Azhar Azeez, president of the Islamic Society of North America, a known radical Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas front group that remains on the Justice Department's list of unindicted terrorist co-conspirators.
Sherman Jackson, who as the King Faisal Chair of Islamic Thought at USC, once gave a lecture at a conference in Toronto that has been described by Cinnamon Stillwell at "Campus Watch" as a "call to battle" between Muslims and the West.
Hoda Hawa (Elshishtawy) national policy analyst for the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which was founded by known members of the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement. The group's former president, Salam al-Marayati, was once kicked off the National Commission on Terrorism after his defense of terrorist acts and the groups who carry them out was revealed.
IBD went on to cite the Detroit Free Press, who reported, "The White House ordered the Muslim attendees not to talk after the meeting about what Obama said during the discussion. However, some have broken the ground rules and leaked what was discussed."
"Topping the agenda was 'anti-Muslim bigotry' and banning Muslim terrorist profiling by federal law enforcement," the report added. "Participants said they got a sympathetic ear from Obama. The president reportedly entertained the idea of naming Muslim judges to federal courts. Meanwhile, the most pressing Muslim-related issue of our time — violent jihadism — was not discussed."
So, once again, Obama’s stealth jihad works in favor of Islam and against the American people. There were no calls for these people to toss out their Korans, which teach to wage war against the infidels and strike the necks of them in the name of Allah. No, they talked about playing the victim to further their agenda against the US.  (Use Google translator)
The Muslim Brotherhood has documented front groups through the United States that are hell bent (literally) on the destruction of the West from within. They have even called for a "long, uncompromising jihad" literally days after meeting with the Obama State Department.
Yet, Obama, the Traitor-in-chief is hosting them in our House! And the less than useless Congress does nothing! Neither do the American people! Why?
Barack Hussein Obama has been outed as a Muslim Brotherhood member and his brother is a financier of the Muslim Brotherhood with tax exempt status. One of his foundations is tied to Islamic terrorism. Furthermore, former Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi received the following from Obama, courtesy of the American taxpayer:

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Not only is this criminal using your hard earned money to empower our enemies, he has the audacity to bring them into ‘our’ House as distinguished guests! Seriously, enough is enough America.
We do not need to wait till 2016 to deal with this criminal. Congress must answer to the people for why they are not acting on his criminal activities. If they will not do the job they were elected to do, and it doesn't seem that they are willing to do it, then we must take action.
Consequently that action is already underway with many Americans are  beginning to target their representatives and provide the foundation to deal with them lawfully at the state level. Won't you join?
“Now the Spirit speaks expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;”  I Timothy 4:1, American King James Version.
An interpretation for today:
And doctrines of Allah; such as are devised by Satan, as all damnable doctrines be; and all lying ones, for Allah/Satan is the father of them; and as are all the false doctrines introduced by the antichrist, for his coming was after the working of Satan; and particularly those doctrines of his concerning worshipping of a false prophet, and saints departed, may be called the doctrines of devils, or of "demons"; being much the same with the demon worship among the Heathens, of which Satan was the inventor: unless by doctrines of devils should be meant the doctrines of men, who for their cunning and sophistry, for their lies and hypocrisy, for their malice, and murdering of the souls of men, are comparable to demonic spirits.
MO prisoner will get $1.5 million from
Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.