Saturday, July 31, 2010

Sharia In New Jersey

While an ABC News story blindly scoffed at the Oklahoma referendum that prohibits the courts from substituting Sharia law in their legal decisions implying that there is no need for the referendum, the rest of the country is incrementally excepting Sharia as an alternative for American law.

By de Andréa

As a continuation and in support of my article titled “THE ISLAMIC STATE OF MICHIGAN” , the state of New Jersey, ‘not’ may be, but ‘will’ likely be, one of the next Islamic states that will be governed by the hatred of Islamic oppressive Sharia law. I say one of the next because it is becoming a race as to which state will stoop and bow the lowest, to Sharia and be the most politically tolerant and multi-Cultural toward the terrorist regime, deceptively called the peaceful religion of Islam.
Jihad Watch reported on Saturday that a New Jersey judge ruled that a Muslim man, accused of forcing non-consensual sex on his wife, was not guilty because of his religious beliefs. (Sharia Law) Husbands are also allowed to murder their wives under Sharia.
Fortunately, an appellate court had the good sense to overturn this absurd decision. But don’t let anyone tell you we don’t need to be concerned about Sharia law being imposed on us here in America! Dearborn Michigan for example totally ignores Constitutional Rulings by a Federal Court. Instead all of the people in Dearborn are subject to Sharia.

Sharia in New Jersey: Muslim husband rapes wife, judge sees no sexual assault because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex.
Because, after all, Satan’s prophet Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning" (Bukhari 4.54.460).

Muhammad also said: "By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel's saddle" (Ibn Majah 1854).

And now a New Jersey judge sees no evidence that a Muslim committed sexual assault of his wife -- not because he didn't do it, but because he was acting on his Islamic beliefs in Sharia.

Here is the portion of his ruling that should leave no doubt that Islamic Sharia law has its foot in the door of New Jersey and is penetrating America:

  • "This court does not feel, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire, or intent, to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited."
In other words, the husband’s belief in Sharia law ‘trumps’ New Jersey criminal law. The husband did not commit a crime because he was acting according to his own Sharia law. What this judge is blindly ignorant of, is that the murder if infidels is also consistent with Islamic Sharia and Islamic practices. “…slay them wherever you find them…” (Sara 4:76) When you meet them, strike off their heads…” Sura 47:4

This is surreptitiously becoming the standard by which all Americans will eventually be judged.

Luckily, ‘this time’ the appellate court overturned this decision, and this Sharia ruling by the New Jersey court was not allowed to stand --- ‘this time’.
  • "Cultural Defense Accepted as to Nonconsensual Sex in New Jersey Trial Court, Rejected on Appeal," by Eugene Volokh in The Volokh Conspiracy, July 23 (thanks to CameoRed): From today's opinion in S.D. v. M.J.R. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.), a domestic restraining order case:

  • The record shall reflect that plaintiff, S.D., and defendant, M.J.R., are citizens of Morocco and adherents to the Muslim faith. They were wed in Morocco in an arranged marriage on July 31, 2008, when plaintiff was seventeen years old. [FN1] The parties did not know each other prior to the marriage. On August 29, 2008, they came to New Jersey as the result of defendant's employment in this country as an accountant....

  • [Long discussion of the wife's allegations of abuse, which included several instances of nonconsensual sex as well as other abuse, omitted for space reasons. -EV]. Upon their return to the apartment, defendant forced plaintiff to have sex with him while she cried. Plaintiff testified that defendant always told her this is according to our religion. You are my wife, I c[an] do anything to you. The woman, she should submit and do anything I ask her to do.

  • After having sex, defendant took plaintiff to a travel agency to buy a ticket for her return to Morocco. However the ticket was not purchased, and the couple returned to the apartment. Once there, defendant threatened divorce, but nonetheless again engaged in nonconsensual sex while plaintiff cried. Later that day, defendant and his mother took plaintiff to the home of the Imam and, in the presence of the Imam, his wife, and defendant's mother, defendant verbally divorced plaintiff....[...]

  • "This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited."
While recognizing that defendant had engaged in sexual relations with plaintiff against her expressed wishes in November 2008 and on the night of January 15 to 16, 2009, the judge did not find sexual assault or criminal sexual conduct to have been proven. He stated:
  • After acknowledging that this was a case in which religious custom clashed with the law, and that under the law, plaintiff had a right to refuse defendant's advances, the judge found that defendant did not act with a criminal intent when he repeatedly insisted upon intercourse, despite plaintiff's violent contrary wishes.

  • The appellate court having found acts of domestic violence consisting of assault and harassment to have occurred, the judge turned to the issue of whether a final restraining order should be entered. He found such an order unnecessary, vacated the temporary restraints previously entered in the matter and dismissed plaintiff's domestic violence action.... The appellate court then reversed this absurd decision, saying: “As the judge recognized, the case thus presents a conflict between the criminal law and religious precepts. In resolving this conflict, the judge determined to except defendant from the operation of the State's statutes as the result of his religious beliefs. In doing so, the judge was mistaken.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: Mistaken indeed… Surreptitiously and incrementally (Islamic, terrorist, oppressive Sharia law) will eventually be primary, replacing all other laws including the Constitution in the United States. Why? Because instead of stopping it as the appellate court in New Jersey did in this case, we are encouraging it. There are already Sharia Courts in Michigan and in Texas.

This is the agenda of Islam and Islam will never stop. But then what can we expect, when we have a Muslim President who believes in Sharia. They Must Be Stopped
de Andréa

Friday, July 30, 2010


If you are an “Oakie from Muskogee”, you might just want to consider moving back. ‘No’ it’s not because I don’t like you, but because I might just consider going with you.

By de Andréa
Is ‘Southern Secession’ once again in the wind?

It seems that Arizona isn’t the only state in trouble with the new Obama National Communist Muslim Government; Oklahoma is also standing in defiance of tyranny.

You just might be a redneck! If the rocking chair on your front porch has a ‘holster’.

Three cheers for a state that has the good sense to do what all the rest of us just talk about and wish for. Good for you Oklahoma! Don’t hold your breath though, waiting for the Communist states of Oregon, Washington, or California to follow suit.

It is past time for the rest of the states to step up to the plate and take care of their citizens and quit worrying about whom they may or may not offend in the process. (something the new central government just won’t do) Based on which states are stepping up, it appears that those redneck jokes may just be on the rest of us!

With information sent to me by one of my readers I have discovered that, Oklahoma may just be the place to live

A return to our roots
An Oklahoma law that passed, 37 to 9, had, as you can see nine liberal atheists in the mix, an amendment to place the Ten Commandments on the front entrance to the state capitol. The Communist atheists in D.C., along with the ACLU, said it would be a big mistake to do so. Hey! --- Oklahoma is a conservative state, based on Christian values; it’s what the country used to be...! HB 1330 Oklahoma did it anyway...

Oh! That’s not all
Oklahoma recently passed a law in the state to incarcerate all illegal immigrants, and ship them back to where they came from unless they want to apply for immigration legally and get a green card. They all scattered. HB 1804. This was of course against the advice of the National Government, and the ACLU, they said it would be a big mistake. Oklahoma did it anyway.

There’s more!
Recently Okalahoma passed a law to include DNA samples from any and all illegals to the Oklahoma database, for criminal investigative purposes. Pelosi said it was unconstitutional. SB 1102 Guess what... Yer right! Oklahoma did it anyway.

And more!
Several weeks ago, they passed a law, declaring Oklahoma as a Sovereign state, not under the new National Government tyranny, joining Texas, Montana, and Utah as the only states to do so. More states are hopefully likely to follow like, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, the Carolina's, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, Mississippi, and Florida. Save your confederate money, it appears the South may be about to rise up once again. HJR 1003.

The rednecks have guns.
The federal Government has made bold steps to take away our guns. So Oklahoma, a week ago, passed a law confirming that people in the state have the right to bear arms and transport them in their vehicles, I think the U.S. Supreme Court did the same thing. I'm sure that this was a set back for the criminals, (Oh, and also for the Obama Communists). Liberal despots didn't like it much either -- But ...Yep, Oklahoma did it anyway.

Just this month, the state voted and passed a law that ALL drivers’ license exams be printed in English, and only English, and no other language. They have been called racist for doing this, but the fact is that ‘ALL’ of the road signs are in English. If you want to drive in Oklahoma, you must read and write English. Seems like a no-brainer to me!

And last but not least as they say
Oklahoma has a referendum going to the voters that prohibits the courts from using Sharia law in their decisions. ABC News scoffed, but Oklahoma is doing it anyway.

By the way, ‘Obama’ does not like any of this. But guess what...who cares...what Obama doesn’t like. Oklahoma is doing it anyway.

Some of the people I send this to won’t like it either…

Well, guess what? Jimmy cracked corn and I don’t…

de Andréa

Thursday, July 29, 2010


So… just what is FARA anyway? Well…FARA is the ‘Foreign Agent Registration Act’ of 1936. It is a little known disclosure statute, requiring entities or individuals acting in the U.S. on behalf of a “foreign principal” to register with the DOJ Department Of Justice.

By de Andréa

So does this mean that all spies and infiltrators must register as spies and infiltrators? In other words those that would advocate the overthrow of the American government by force or vioalnce? Seems silly doesn’t it? In someways, it seams as though it kind’a abrogates the idea of ‘spyhood’. Maybe that’s the idea. And wouldn’t this Include Obama? I mean isn’t he an infiltrator, working for a foreign entity as well as overthrowing our Republic and replacing is with a Communist Muslim regime? Oh well! Nothing good lasts for ever anyway, right?

Originally passed to identify Nazi spies and infiltrators in America in the mid thirties, (but as it turns out its much more than that) FARA is still alive, ‘not well’, but still alive today. After the threat of Nazism was over it was used to register and identify Soviet Communist infiltrators and spies. But why isn’t it used to register and identify Islamic spies and infiltrators??? Could it be’ that we are so deceived by this very warm and fuzzy “peaceful Nation of Islam” that we just don’t see them for what they really are? We weren’t deceived by Communists or Nazis, well…maybe just a little! Hopefully this may be about to ‘Change’.

The following is a comparison of an Islamic infiltrating spy organization to recent indictments violating FARA

What does (CAIR) the Council on American Islamic Relations, Anna Chapman, and Rep. Mark Siljander Have in Common? According to FARA, they are all unregistered “Foreign Agents”

Late last month, provocative pictures of Russian spy Anna Chapman, (truly eye candy), graced newspapers and blogs worldwide. The stories featured scandalous accounts of “spying”, infiltration, and “espionage.” But despite the insinuations, the ten Russian “spies” in question were never charged with spying or espionage. Fox News reported that instead, the Russian spies in American custody were charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and “failing to register with the Department of Justice as Foreign Agents under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).”

FARA, first enacted in 1938, is a disclosure statute requiring entities acting in the U.S. on behalf of a “foreign principal” (in this case the Russian government) to register and make periodic disclosures of their relationship.

Below, Anna Chapman is flanked by former Congressman Mark Siljander and CAIR Communications Director and Islamic Terrorest, Ibrahim “Dougie” Hooper.

“CAIR” is the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the organization that was named as a co-conspirator in the Muslim Brotherhood and Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism financing Federal trial in history that resulted in 108 guilty verdicts.

As recently as February of this year, even though I brought it to the attention of the FBI 5 years ago, the Department of Justice finally affirmed that CAIR is a front organization in the United States for the terrorist organization Hamas.

CAIR the Council on American Islamic Relations is in fact another U.S.-based entity that among other things, has been accused of violating FARA by the Center for Security Policy and other leading intelligence and counter-terrorism organizations. So why hasn’t it been indicted under FARA??? Maybe Obama is right America is already an Islamic State.

The CAIR website ( documents that CAIR has received $6.6 million in cash and loans and $54.5 million in pledges from foreign principals based in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait; they have met and coordinated with representatives of those foreign principals on more than 30 occasions; and have carried out over 70 major political and propaganda operations on behalf of those same foreign principals.

Shortly after 9/11 CAIR released a carefully qualified statement: “We do not support directly or indirectly, or receive support from, any overseas… government.” Unfortunately for CAIR, FARA § 611 (b) defines a “foreign principal” far more broadly than just a foreign government. It can also be a foreign political party, partnership, association, corporation, organization, or even an individual based outside of the United States.

For a 72-year-old law, the FARA statute is very much alive and kicking in 2010. It is in the news nearly every week now. Under funded and underestimated, the attorneys in the small FARA office are trying to protect America’s security, in spite of an increasingly politicized extremist ‘Sharia tolerant’ DOJ environment.

Just last week former Congressman Mark D. Siljander of Michigan (an Islamic State) pleaded guilty to violating FARA in connection with his work for a foreign organization; namely the Islamic American Relief Agency, a.k.a. the Islamic Africa Relief Agency (IARA), a non-governmental terrorist organization based in Khartoum, Sudan. The IARA paid Mr. Siljander $75,000 in exchange for his lobbying efforts to have its name removed from a U.S. Senate Finance Committee list of terror-supporting organizations.

The Siljander FARA violation case is nearly a point-by-point match for CAIR’s work as an agent for “foreign principals” in the United Arab Emirates in the wake of the Dubai Ports scandal of 2006. As part of a senior CAIR delegation to Dubai in May 2006, Board Chairman Parvez Ahmad stated, “If the image of Islam and Muslims is not repaired in America, Muslim and Arab business interests will continue to be on a downward slide in the US.” CAIR was meeting with Khalaf Al Habtoor and other wealthy Dubai businessmen to solicit up to $50 million in donations to fund a public relations campaign in the US. CAIR’s Ahmad assured the audience, “Do not think about your contributions as donations. Think about it from the perspective of rate of return. The investment of $50 million will give you billions of dollars in return for 50 years.”

Within days of the fundraiser UAE Minister of Finance Sheikh Hamdan bin Rashid Al Maktoum endorsed a proposal to build an endowment property for CAIR in the U.S. CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad said, ‘The endowment will serve as a source of income and will further allow us to reinvigorate our media campaign…”

Furthermore, in 2007 CAIR received $325,000 in cash from another “foreign principal” based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). This mammoth pan-Islamic NGO composed of 57 governments is known for its “10 Year Plan of Action,” calling on all governments worldwide to institute “deterrent punishments” for the “crime” of “Islamophobia.” This is the same OIC that annually sponsors (and passes) resolutions in the U.N. General Assembly to prohibit “defamation of religions” (i.e. Islam). Barack Obama controversially appointed Rashad Hussein as a special US envoy to the OIC this year. The $325,000 transferred to CAIR was earmarked to fund a major OIC conference on “Islamophobia” at Georgetown University, (once a Christian University, now an Islamic University).

The ten Russian spies acted as sleeper agents for the Russian government. They received “hundreds of thousands of dollars” from Moscow. They were indicted under FARA by the Department of Justice in 2010.

Former Congressman Siljander lobbied members of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee to remove the Islamic Africa Relief Agency (IARA) from their terrorist sponsor list. He received $75,000 from the Sudan-based NGO for his services. Siljander was indicted under FARA by the Department of Justice in 2008, and pleaded guilty in 2010.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has lobbied for “foreign principals” and has conducted dozens of political influence operations in the US on their behalf. Conclusive documentation at the CAIR Observatory website has been posted proving that CAIR has received $6,698,454 in cash and loans from “foreign principals” since their founding in 1994.

So how close is CAIR to being indicted under FARA? Well… despite proof that CAIR is a tax exempt terrorist organization, and not a Muslim Charity as it advertises, it has become so deeply embedded in American Society, that it has been protected by the Obama administration and the FBI.

The next few months however may tell. On February 2, 2010 reported that FBI agents issued a grand jury subpoena seeking internal CAIR documents. Lynn Haaland, an assistant U.S. Attorney in the DOJ’s National Security Division was listed as an “interested party,” indicating that FARA may have been a factor in the investigation.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Ten Russians, one former congressman, and CAIR were all paid by foreign donors. The Russians, the congressman and CAIR all followed their paymasters’ orders.

The Russians and the congressman got chump change compared to CAIR’s billions in foreign funding.

The Russians were indicted and deported. The ex-congressman was indicted and plead guilty. What might be in store for CAIR?

Or are we still too blindly deceived to see, hear, read, and understand… the obvious?

de Andréa

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Public Brainwashing

Public education is not education at all, it is mind control, pure and simple forced “brainwashing”

By de Andréa

I have written many articles on “American public - so-called education” describing it as indoctrination, mind control, brainwashing, and or robotic programming. What ever it is, it is certainly anything but education.

Even with all the examples I have written about, I still get hate-mail calling ‘me’ un-American because I point out the obvious truth.

Don’t --- doubt me!

Well get ready… I have yet another example of blatant “BRAINWASHING” in our universities.

This one is about a student at Augusta State University in Augusta Georgia. It seems Jennifer Keeton; a graduate student just has ‘wrong thinking’, probably something genetic. Anyway in order for her to get her master’s in counseling she must be reprogrammed. You see she has the dreaded Christian beliefs brain dysfunction... And according to the robots at the university, ‘she must be fixed’…

Jennifer Keeton, a counseling major has filed suit against a university in Georgia because she claims the school is forcing her to abandon her Christian beliefs in order to receive her degree.

Twenty four year old Jennifer Keeton, is pursuing her master's degree in counseling at Augusta State University. But after her professors learned of her Christian Biblical beliefs -- specifically her views on homosexual conduct -- from both classroom discussions and from rubber-hose interrogations of other students (well… maybe not rubber-hose, not yet anyway) about private conversations with her. The school has subsequently imposed a "remediation plan.” (Code words for ‘re’programming)

Moreover, unless she completes this so-called "remediation plan" to their satisfaction, she will be thrown out of the school's counseling program, and or, out of the school altogether.

David French, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, said there are some absurd elements to the remedial plan. "Such as the plans final test, forcing her to go to a “gay-pride parade” and then, write about her feelings after the parade," he describes. "In other words, [the school's plan would be] to deliberately expose her to behavior that she finds disgusting and immoral in the hope that she has been reprogrammed to accept it. The university academics say that she is just ‘wrong minded’.

"Jennifer said she is not interested in being indoctrinated, she wants to be educated," states the attorney. "She wants to learn about the counseling profession, she wants to be a good counselor and a good American-- but being a American and a good counselor does not require one to surrender their most fundamental religious beliefs.” They've turned this school into nothing more than a Nazi re-education camp. “Brainwashing”

As I said before “don’t doubt me”

THE BOTTOM LINE: This ‘extreme’ may not yet be typical, but public - school indoctrination is. While the “Alphabet Soup Media” has biased the general public, the public school system tries to systematic and robotically brainwashed the future of this country. It just doesn’t work on some kids like Jennifer Keeton, thank God!

While we should have learned our lessons from the robotic indoctrination of Nazi Germany and the Communist Soviet Union, as well as the Nation of Islam, we instead are blindly following in their same foot steps. And guess what my robotically programmed friend…we will soon arrive at the same destination.

Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is repeating the same mistakes over and over again, expecting a different result”. Maybe Einstein wasn’t so stupid after all!

Maybe it is ‘we’ that are blindly stuck on stupid…

Yeah ya think???

de Andréa

Federal Law Is Not To Be Enforced

Does this mean that all federal laws are not to be enforced within the boarders of a state, or just some of the laws, or maybe just one of the laws??? Why does congress bother to pass laws that if any state dares to enforce them, they are taken to court? Obviously Obama doesn’t know the purpose of Law, just the purpose of tyranny.

By de Andréa

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked some of the toughest provisions of Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s illegal immigration law, putting on hold the state's attempt to have local police enforce existing federal immigration policy.

Though the rest of the law is still set to go into effect, the partial injunction on SB 1070 means Arizona, for the time being, will not be able to require police officers to determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest, in other words, no usual background checks. If I were the chief of the Arizona state police, I would tell Obama and his communist goons, to go suck an egg. And to some degree this is just what he might do.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton also struck down the section of law that makes it a crime not to carry immigration registration papers. The judge apparently doesn’t know that the congressionally passed federal law has for many years, required immigrants to carry visas and or green cards. And also the provision that makes it a crime for an illegal immigrant to seek or perform work. How about the provision that makes it a crime to seek or perform a crime? I guess that one is gone as well…

Click here to read the ruling.
In all, Bolton struck down four sections of the law, the ones that opponents called the most controversial. Bolton said she was putting those sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

The ruling said the Obama administration, which sought the injunction, is likely to "succeed on the merits" in showing the above provisions are preempted by federal law.
"The court by no means disregards Arizona's interests in controlling illegal immigration and addressing the concurrent problems with crime including the trafficking of humans, drugs, guns, and money," the ruling said. "Even though Arizona's interests may be consistent with those of the federal government, it is not in the public interest for Arizona to enforce preemptive laws."

So what this is telling me is --- that because the fed believes that all federal law is preemptive, then it is not in the public interest for federal law to be enforced within the boarders of any state. Sound confusing? Well it should. This is what happens when law is abandoned for the sake of tyranny.

Does this ruling apply to all states? Is this a federal preemptive ‘ruling’? If yes, then if one is --- lets say, is stopped for running a red light or exceeding the posted speed limit by 5 miles or so, can you just say to the officer “لا أفهم يا سيدي الضابط الإنكليزي and then he will have to let you go because he cannot ask you for your identification?

Is this a court ruling that preempts the law? This is case law --- does it preempt federal law already on the books? Is this a case of ruling the country from the bench? Of course it is…

A number of provisions will still go into effect as the case is litigated. Arizona will still be able to block state officials from so-called "sanctuary city" policies limiting enforcement of federal law that require that state officials to work with federal officials on illegal immigration; allow civil suits over sanctuary cities; and make it a crime to pick up day laborers.

The ruling came just as police were making last-minute preparations to begin enforcement of the law and protesters were planning large demonstrations to speak out against the measure. At least one group planned to block access to federal offices, daring officers to ask them about their immigration status.

Justice Department spokeswoman Hannah August said the court "ruled correctly" with its decision Wednesday. "While we understand the frustration of Arizonans with the broken immigration system, a patchwork of state and local policies would seriously disrupt federal immigration enforcement and would ultimately be counterproductive," August said. Got news for you Hannah, it isn’t Arizona that has the broken immigration system, it isn’t even the immigration system that is broken, it is the Federal Government that is broken…

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., one of the most vocal advocates on immigration issues on Capitol Hill, applauded the decision. Now --- the following statement typifies the stuck on stupid ignorance of the Democrat Communist Liberals. "Arresting people based on their appearance and holding them until you can investigate their immigration status is patently un-American and unconstitutional," Rep. Gutierrez said. Mr. Gutierrez,,, READ THE LAW, the law has nothing to do with how they are dressed or how they appear. Moreover, ‘you’, along with the illegals are the ones who are un-American Mr. Gutierrez.

By contrast, someone who obviously has at least read the law: Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., called the ruling "misguided." --- "The federal government has a right and a responsibility to enforce existing laws, but when they fail to meet that responsibility, we should not stand in the way of the states that take action to respond to the very real threat of border violence, drug cartels, and human smuggling.” He said in a written statement. "There's nowhere in the Constitution that says a state is limited to what it absolutely won't do and can be stopped for what it might do and to exercise a judgment against a state that has passed a law that is consistent with existing federal law is beyond absurd."

The volume of the protests will likely be turned down a few notches because of the ruling by Bolton, a Clinton advocate appointee who suddenly became a judge and a crucial figure in the immigration debate when she was assigned the seven lawsuits filed against the Arizona law.

Lawyers for the state of Arizona contend the law was ‘a constitutionally sound attempt’ by Arizona -- the busiest illegal gateway into the country -- to assist federal immigration agents and lessen border woes such as the heavy costs for educating, jailing, and providing health care for illegal immigrants.

Opponents argued the law ‘will’ lead to racial profiling, (now the communists are fortune tellers seeing into the future, they can’t even see the nose in front of their face) and conflict with federal immigration law and distract local police from fighting more serious crimes. What could be more serious than fighting crimes of murder, rape, kidnapping, and a host of other violent crimes committed by illegal criminal aliens.

Localities inside Arizona were already preparing to enforce the law. The hardest-line approach was expected in the Phoenix area, where Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio plans his 17th crime and immigration sweep. He plans to hold the sweep regardless of the ruling. Thumbs up Sheriff.

Arpaio, known for his tough stance against illegal immigration, plans to send out about 200 deputies and volunteers who will be looking for traffic violators, people wanted on criminal warrants and others. He has used that tactic before to arrest dozens of people, many of them illegal immigrants. "We don't wait. We just do it," he said. "If there's a new law out, we're going to enforce it."

Now you might be inclined to misinterpret this as racial profiling or discrimination on point of origin. But this is your programmed indoctrinated liberal mind talking without thinking. Take a closer look at what the sheriff plans to do, nowhere is there any reference to race, point of origin, or ethnicity. The Quote, “…will be looking for traffic violators, people wanted on criminal warrants and others”… This is what law enforcement does, this is what law enforcement is suppose to do. Enforce the law and arrest the criminals. It just so happens that 70% of the criminals in Arizona are illegal aliens from Mexico and the Middle East.

THE BOTTOM LINE: California --- look out! A large number of illegals have already moved into southern California, anticipating the new law. The Liberal Communists of Los Angles might get a real backlash for their attempted boycott of Arizona.

But then this might just wake up some of those sleeping politically correct tolerant multi-Culturalistic elitist aristocrats in L.A. that nothing uncomfortable ever touches, to the reality of the foreign criminal invasion that has been going on unabated for years in America.

Ask yourself, as a legal citizen, what crimes am I going to be exempt from?

Arizona is standing up for their sovereign rights --- that’s why they are in trouble with the National Dictatorship…

de Andréa

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Sleeping Through 31 Years of War

If you think as many do, that the so-called war on terror began after September 11, 2001, then you have definitely been asleep at least since November 4, 1979, maybe even before.

By de Andréa

On that horrorifing morning in September 2001, 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners. The hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. A third into the very nucleus of our military and the fourth was foiled because a few Americans woke up to what was going on, got to their feet and yelled those now famous words… “lets roll” the rest, as they say, is history. But was that really, the beginning?

If you believe that all we have to do is bring our troops home from Iraq, reset the snooze alarm, go back to sleep, and no one will ever bother us again, then you have missed it altogether. World War III began on November 4, 1979, and when you finely wake up and get out of bed it will likely be all over and you will have lost everything, your freedom, your country, maybe even your life...

Just hit the snooze button once again!
That's what we think we heard on the 11th of September 2001 (When more than 3,000 Americans were killed) and maybe it was true, but I think it should have been 'Get Out of Bed!' The truth is, the alarm clock had been buzzing continuously for 22 years already, and we continue even today to hit the snooze button and roll over for a few more minutes of peaceful sleep.

The real beginning
Sent to me by one of my readers; The following, at least in part, is a chronological accounting of the continuous attacks by the unrecognized Nation of Islam for the past 31 years, that still continues today. Moreover, the Infiltration of Islam’s agenda to make America an Islamic State still goes totally unnoticed and unopposed.

Chapter I (just kidding)
It was a cool fall day in November 1979 in a country going through a religious and political upheaval when a group of Muslim terrorists attacked and seized the American Embassy in Tehran. This seizure was an outright attack on America; it was an attack that held the world's most powerful country hostage, as well as paralyzed a Presidency. It was technically the first Islamic terrorist attack on American soil, which is technically also an act of war against a sovereign nation. The failed response to the attack on this sovereign U. S. Embassy set the stage for events to follow for the next 31 years. The following ill fated mission to rescue the American hostages ended in ruin, but stood as a symbol of America’s weakness and inability to deal with terrorism, what’s more, it symbolized our unwillingness or inability to recognize --- just who this enemy really is. .

America’s military had been decimated and down sized since the end of the Vietnam War. A poorly trained, poorly equipped, and poorly organized military was called on to execute a complex mission that was doomed from the start. Because of our inability to properly respond after the 1979 Tehran attack, Americans began to be kidnapped and killed throughout the Middle East and the rest of the world. This once powerful Nation was seen by our enemy, as week. America could do little to protect her citizens living and working abroad.

The attacks against the US continued.
In April of 1983 a large vehicle packed with high explosives was driven into the US Embassy compound in Beirut Lebanon. When it explodes, it kills 63 people. The alarm went off again, and again, but America just hit the Snooze Button, rolled over and went back to sleep.

Then just six short months later in 1983 a large truck heavily laden down with over 2500 pounds of TNT smashed through the main gate of the US Marine Corps headquarters in Beirut and 241 US servicemen are killed. America mourns her dead; we close our Marine base and withdraw our troops. We were told that Lebanon was having a civil war (when instead the truth was that we were attacked by Islam’s Hisbala) and we hit the Snooze Button once more.

Two months later in December 1983, another truck loaded with explosives is driven into the US Embassy in Kuwait, we rolled over, yawned, and America continued her slumber.

The following year, in September 1984, another van was driven into the gate of the US Embassy in Beirut but America slept on.

Soon terrorism spreads to Europe. In April 1985 a bomb explodes in a restaurant frequented by US soldiers in Madrid - nothing is done.

Then in August 1985 a Volkswagen loaded with explosives is driven into the main gate of the US Air Force Base at Rhein-Main Germany, 22 are killed and the alarm is buzzing louder and louder as the US is continually attacked. But, you guessed it, we continue to sleep on…

Fifty-nine days later in 1985 a cruise ship, the Achille Lauro is hijacked and we watched as an American in a wheelchair is singled out of the passenger list and executed. Wiping the sleep from our eyes, we still fail to recognize the real enemy.

The terrorists then shift their tactics to bombing civilian airliners when they bomb TWA Flight 840 in April of 1986 that killed 4 and then --- the most tragic bombing, Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988, killing 259. It goes on and on…

The wake up alarm is getting louder and louder.
The terrorists decide to bring the fight directly to a sleeping America. In January 1993, two CIA agents are shot and killed as they enter CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. The following month, February 1993, a group of terrorists are arrested after a rented van packed with explosives is driven into the underground parking garage of the World Trade Center in New York City . Six people are killed and over 1000 are injured. Still, this is considered a crime and not an act of war? The Snooze alarm is depressed once again.

Then in November 1995 a car bomb explodes at a US military complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia killing seven service men and women. A few months later in June of 1996, another truck bomb explodes only 35 yards from the US military compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. It destroys the Khobar Towers , a US Air Force barracks, killing 19 and injuring over 500. The terrorists are getting bolder and smarter as they see that America does not respond.

They move to coordinate their attacks in a simultaneous attack on two US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. These attacks were planned with precision. They killed 224. We responded with a cruise missile attack and then we went back to sleep.

We were awaken when the USS Cole was docked in the port of Aden Yemen, for refueling on 12 October 2000, and a small craft pulled along side the ship and exploded killing 17 US Navy Sailors and disabling the ship. Attacking a US War Ship is an act of war, but we instead sent the FBI to investigate and then we looked a the clock and went back to sleep.

And of course you know the events a little more than a year latter; on 11 September 2001 the Nation of Islam killed more than 3000 people in the heart of NYC. Most Americans think this was the first attack against America; and we were told that it was by one man “Osama bin Ladin” our government later defined it as a “Man Caused Disaster” this happened because we had been asleep for 22 years. How wrong, deaf dumb and blind can a people be?

America has been under a constant attack by the Nation of Islam since 1979 and we chose over and over again to hit the snooze alarm, roll over, and go back to sleep. We were attacked on 9/11 because we were seen as week and unresponsive by a Nation with the ideology of oppression and destruction who fully intends to destroy us. .

We are at war with the Nation of Islam
In the news lately we have seen lots of finger pointing from every high official in government over what they knew and what they didn't know. But if you've read the papers and paid a little attention I think you can see exactly what they should have known. You don't have to be in the FBI or CIA or on the National Security Council to see the pattern that has been developing since 1979. Man! Connect the dots already.

We have obviously been in a war for the past 31 years and it will continue until we are defeated, or as a people decide fight back. America needs to 'Get out of Bed' and act decisively --- now!

Our president Barack Hussein Obama refuses to identify our enemy as the Nation of Islam because he is one of them. Watch a video of Obama saying so himself. If I could ask Obama one question, I would ask him if we are not at war with the Nation of Islam, then just who are we at war with --- Mister Obama??? If he rightly and properly identified our enemy as the Nation of Islam he could be tried for treason because he has admitted that he is one of them, “an enemy of the State”.

But this is exactly what needs to be done, if we don’t identify the enemy for who and what it is then we will lose the Islamic war that silently rages right here in America. Oh! YOU HAVEN’T HEARD OF THAT WAR EITHER. Read my article titled “The Islamic State of Michigan” Neighborhood by neighborhood and state by state…

THE BOTTOM LINE: America has been changed forever. We now have to be ready to pay the price and make the sacrifice to ensure that our way of life continues. We cannot afford to keep hitting the snooze button again and again and continue to roll over and go back to sleep.

Regardless of what the outcome of the war is in the Middle East, we haven’t even begun to identify the silent war that rages right here in our own neighborhoods, in our towns and in our sovereign states. Nearly every state now has an Islmic terrorists training facility, and we still’ continue to sleep on.

After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 2, 1941, with 2117 American service men dead, Admiral Yamamoto of the Japanese Navy (who I personally met when I was 17 years old) said, “… it seems all we have done is awakened a sleeping giant”. This, my sleepy friend, is the message we need to disseminate to Muslim terrorists around the world. We need to wake up get on our feet and fight for our country and our freedom both abroad and here at home no matter what the cost. We have to stop making nice with the enemy and instead, punch his lights out.

This is not a political thing to be hashed over in an election year. This is an AMERICAN thing. This is about survival. This is about our Freedom and the Freedom of our children in years to come. As in the Second World War, our very survival is at stake but so far we just keep hitting the snooze button when the alarm goes off over and over again.

If you agree please forward this to as many people as you can, especially to the young people that have been robotically programmed and all those who have dozed off in history class and who are so politically correct, tolerant and multi-Cultural and are so quick to protest such necessary action both abroad and here at home.

If you don't agree, then just close your eyes, and go back to sleep, the next attack may be in your front yard…

It’s time for America to wake up, get unstuck from stupid, stand up and say; get your seventh century prayer rug off my freedom, ‘To Hell, with your Sharia law’ and get out of my country!!!

Now, is not soon enough!

de Andréa.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Judges Afraid to hear Critical Case

No judge --- wants to be the one left ‘standing’ with no chair to sit on when the music stops playing.

By de Andréa

So what is ‘this’ “Critical Case”? Well… that’s the dilemma --- not only does a judge not want to be left standing alone, but this is what the issue has become --- the issue of “STANDING”.

The Obama eligibility case has become a “standing” or more definitively, a stalling case in order to evade the overwhelming evidence in Obama’s fraud and violation of constitutional eligibility --- case.

So what is legal “Standing” anyway? Well one must have legal standing in order to bring a civil case against someone. In other words one must be able to prove that one has lost something or been effected in a serious way by the actions of the accused.

The issue of standing should have been more than clear to the judges: "How can a judge deny he is seriously affecting you and me? He wants to have terror trials in New York. He published the CIA interrogation techniques. On and on. He goes around bowing our enemy’s King and doing all these anti American things. His statements, “we are not a Christian nation; but we're one of the worlds largest Muslim nations”. It's all there. Obama is seriously affecting everyone. As far as loosing something, isn’t loosing my freedom a big enough loss?

Legal standing aside, this should be a criminal case brought by the U.S. Attorney General, fat chance of that happening any time soon.

But now this whole evasive technique for what ever reason, is beginning to backfire on the courts. In several of the suites filed against Obama, the lawyers themselves were fined for bringing a frivolous lawsuit without legal standing. If these rulings against the lawyers become a court case then the prosecuting attorneys can demand right of discovery. In other words the defendant Barack Hussein Obama would have to prove that there is no “Standing” by disclosing and producing the necessary documents.

It will eventually be essential to obtain a decision from the highest court in the land because of the multitude of cases that have been brought over the eligibility issue. Virtually none of the courts has addressed the question of eligibility itself. All have been decided on a legal tap dance routine called lack of legal "standing" and or other side issues, like a care weaving in and out of traffic, pretending it’s not there. Only the Supreme Court can decide this issue in the context of the constitutions Article 2 standing.

Obama can legally claim no special privacy rights to his birth documentation since the Pandora’s Box has been opened; his campaign already has posted publicly online an image of a "Certification of Live Birth," a document that was available to undocumented children or children not born in Hawaii at the time. Documents such as the long form birth certificate supporting this certificate of live birth should be made public. But then this Issue is not even being discussed because the Issue has been over shadowed by the fabricated side stepping Issue of “Standing”.
I think the courts are really afraid of this. –- 'Should the court be inclined to find that these attorneys are liable under Rule 38 for defendants' damages and costs, the court will be forced to recognize and enforce the right of discovery and whether or not the defendant actually has a copy of a 1961 long-form birth certificate, and related documents.

This is also the case for several high ranking military officers refusing direct orders coming down the chain of command from the Commander and Chief, President Obama. These Officers have respectfully refused such orders on the bases that Obama hasn’t proved that he is eligible to be the Commander and Chief of the military. Court Martials are pending. If a military trial or any other kind of trial results, the defense can and will demand full discovery disclosure, a real scary dilemma for Obama if he doesn’t have the necessary documented proof of eligibility.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Well ­­--- the bottom line is still to be ‘discovered or disclosed’ so to speak. If push comes to shove, it looks as if Obama might find himself between the proverbial rock and a ‘harder’ place. I just don’t know how long Obama’s lawyers can keep this stall tactic from becoming a process that just may bury him. Obama has so far spent close to two million to cover up this crime against America, and stall this inevitable disclosure. Why would he do that if he in fact were not a British citizen, or worse yet, a citizen of the Muslim State of Indonesia?
Obama may not only be the first “Black President” of the United States, but he might also be the first ‘Foreign President’ of the United States. Possibly even an illegal alien. Maybe that’s why he wants amnesty for illegals.
Do you think maybe this is why the Framers wrote this into the constitution???

Yeah, ya think?

de Andréa

Friday, July 23, 2010

The Building of Obama’s Islamic Nation

Would you believe??? Some of my readers still don’t believe that their President, Barack Hussein Obama is a sleeper Muslim terrorist. This just proves how bloody powerful the Islamic deception really is, and how deaf blind and how ‘really’, ‘really’, stuck on stupid we have become.

By de Andréa

Even when Obama himself says that he is a Muslim and that America is a Muslim nation and is no longer a Christian nation it falls on deceived and deaf ears. We have become Islamic enablers and are participating in our own demise.

Even when he appoints Muslim Czars to key positions in his administration, even when he appoints Eboo Patel, a Muslim terrorist as his advisor on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, passing this off as an interfaith council.

Even using Interfaith and Islam in the same sentence is a contradiction and a blaintant lie; there can be no interfaith in Islam. The ultimate goal here is to create Islamic neighborhoods, Islamic cities, Islamic counties, Islamic states, and finally…; an Islamic America. Read my previous article titled: The Islamic State of Michigan it’s already happening my poor deceived friend.

Another foot in the door
A so-called religion adviser to President Obama has close ties to the imam who wants to build a 13-story Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero in NYC. The two have been documented together discussing America as "the ideal place for a renewal of Islam.” Ground zero or not, this is called getting ones Muslim foot in the door of a neighborhood, a very important neighborhood. If they can get their foot through the door in a neighborhood that they blatantly tried to destroy, then they can potentially control the country while slapping our culture in the face.

In February, Obama named a Chicago Muslim terrorist, Eboo Patel, to his Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Patel is the founder and executive director of the Chicago-based Interfaith Youth Core, which says it promotes pluralism by teaming people of different faiths on service projects. As I said, a blatant contraction.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the controversial Muslim leader behind the plan to build the Islamic center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero, wrote the afterword to Patel's 2006 book, "Building the Interfaith Youth Movement, [Obama’s Citizen Youth Brigade]J Beyond Dialogue to Action."

Patel is listed as one of 15 "Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow" on the website for the American Society for the Advancement of Muslims, or ASAM, Called the Militant Islam Monitor.ORG, which is led by Rauf.

In Patel's 2007 book, "Saving Each Other, Saving Ourselves," he recounts discussing with Rauf the future of Islam in the U.S.

Rauf "understood the vision immediately and suggested that I visit him and his wife, Daisy Khan, at their home the following evening," Patel recalled.

Khan, Rauf’s wife, founded the ASAM with her husband and has aided him in his plans for the mosque near Ground Zero. "The living room of their apartment on the Upper West Side was set up like a mosque, with prayer rugs stretched from wall to wall," wrote Patel in his book.

Continued Patel: "I arrived at dusk, prayed the “maghrib prayer” with Daisy and Imam Feisal and then talked with them about how America, with its unique combination of religious devotion and religious diversity, was the ideal place for a renewal of Islam."
"In the twentieth century, Catholicism and Judaism underwent profound transformations in America," Rauf observed. "I think, this century, in America, Islam will do the same."
Patel boasts of a "critical mass" of Muslims in the U.S.

Bear in mind no matter what flavor of Islam one is talking about, Islam’s agenda, always has been, and always will be, to dominate, Islam does not assimilate.

"Islam is a religion that has always been revitalized [not reformed] by its migration," he wrote. "America is a nation that has been constantly rejuvenated by immigrants. There is now a critical mass of Muslims in America."

Patel last March wrote a Huffington Post piece referring to Obama's former "green jobs" czar Van Jones as a "faith hero." "In my last post on Van, I called him an American patriot," wrote Patel. "That is high praise in my book. But watching Van's speech at the NAACP, I have another title for him, one that I reserve for the true giants of history. Van Jones is a faith hero."

Jones resigned in September after it was exposed that he founded a communist revolutionary organization and signed a statement that accused the Bush administration of involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Jones also called for "resistance" against the U.S.

Jones previously stated his advocacy for green jobs was part of a broader movement to destroy U.S. freedom and its capitalist system which is part of Obama’s agenda. One day after the 9/11 attacks, Jones a “Black Muslim” Communist, led a vigil that expressed solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans as well as what he called the victims of "U.S. imperialism" around the world.

Rauf, meanwhile, has caused a stir with his proposed $100 million, 13-story Islamic cultural center, and mosque near the corner of Park Place and West Broadway.
Rauf sparked controversy earlier this month when he refused during a live radio interview to condemn violent jihad groups as terrorists. Rauf repeatedly refused on the air to affirm the U.S. designation of Hamas as a terrorist organization or to call the Muslim Brotherhood what they are, terrorist extremists.

The Federally indicted Muslim terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood as well as its affiliate, the Council on American Islamic Relations CAIR, openly seeks to spread Islam around the world, while Hamas is committed to Israel's destruction and is responsible for scores of suicide bombings, shootings, and rocket attacks aimed at Jewish civilian population centers.

During the interview, Rauf was also asked who he believes was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks. "There's no doubt," stated Rauf. "The general perception all over the world was it was created by people who were sympathetic to Osama bin Laden. Whether they were part of the killer group or not, these are details that need to be left to the law-enforcement experts."

Rauf has been on record several times blaming U.S. policies for the Sept. 11 attacks. He has been quoted refusing to admit Muslims carried out the attacks. Referring to the Sept. 11 attacks, Rauf told CNN, "U.S. policies were an accessory to the crime that happened. We (the U.S.) have been an accessory to a lot of innocent lives dying in the world. Osama bin Laden was made in the USA."

Rauf's 2004 book had two different titles, one in English and the second in Arabic. In the U.S., his book was called "What's right with America is what's right with Islam."
The same book, published in Arabic, bore the name "The Call From the WTC Rubble: Islamic Da'wah From the Heart of America Post-9/11."

THE BOTTOM LINE: The war in the Middle East is of not consequence to Islam, The west will loose in the long term. Islam owns the Middle East and always will.

While the West concentrates on the Iraqi, Afghanistan, and potential Iranian wars, Islam is concentrating on the West. Western Europe, the America’s Australia, New Zealand, and the Philippines etc. Moreover, because of our stubborn blindness and complacency we will lose the West as well.

I hope you have ordered your hijaab and a good supply of prayer rugs, and oh! Have you learned the maghrib yet?

de Andréa

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

The Islamic State of Michigan

Sharia’s foot is through the door. Muslims are in, Christians are out… Islamic Sharia law has been in America for several years, but ‘now’ it is being enforced by American police. With a 30% Islamic population, Dearborn Michigan is all but totally controlled by the nation of Islam and Sharia law. Moreover, American Citizens have no rights whatsoever and freedom does not exist. I’m sorry to say this, but by the time your children, and or grandchildren are grown, all of America will be an oppressive Islamic State.
By de Andréa

Would you invite a known murdering terrorist pedophile into your home to rape your wife and assault and kill your children? ‘No’… Of course not, you say --- but you have been deceived my friend, because that is exactly what you have done.

The disease of Islamic Sharia Law has more than got its evil foot in the door of your home ‘and’ the once free United States of America. Their demonic oppressive Sharia law now takes precedence over the constitutionally guaranteed rights of American Citizens.

The State of Michigan now has a Muslim terrorist population exceeding that of the entire country of Afghanistan. As a result, many cities, towns, and counties, have Muslim majority councils and are introducing Sharia ordinances. In the near future watch for the establishment of Sharia courts all over the country.

Just a reminder…Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate and dominate. So if you have a desire to be a Muslim, a Muslim slave, or be assassinated by a Muslim, then ignore this warning and just tap your foot awhile and your wish will be granted… soon.

One of the nation's top legal teams regarding civil and religious rights has stepped into a hornets nest stemming from last months Muslim Festival in Dearborn Michigan, where police have been, despite a court order, enforcing Islamic Sharia law for several years now.

The annual Arab event was held June 18, 2010 in Dearborn, where an estimated 30,000 of the city's 98,000 residents are Muslim.

"Dearborn officers arrested four Christian missionaries, and illegally confiscated their video cameras which were recording the events surrounding their arrests," said a statement from the Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich.

The law center announcement said the incident has been described as "police enforcement of Shariah law.” The organization said it would represent the Christians. "These Christian missionaries were exercising their constitutional rights of free speech and the free exercise of religion, but apparently the Constitution carries little weight in Dearborn, where the Muslim population seems to dominate the political apparatus," said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center. "It's very apparent that these arrests were a retaliatory action over the embarrassing video of the strong arm tactics used last year by festival security guards. This time, the first thing police officers did before making the arrests was to confiscate the video cameras in order to prevent a recording of what was actually happening," Thompson said.

Arrested on charges of breach of the peace were Negeen Mayel, Dr. Nabeel Qureshi, Paul Rezkalla and David Wood. Watch video of last year’s event and arrests. Mayel, an 18-year-old woman whose parents emigrated from Afghanistan and a recent convert to Christianity, was arrested and charged with failure to obey a police officer's orders. She was approximately 100 feet away and videotaping a discussion with Muslims when her camera was seized.

Police Chief Ron Haddad, a Muslim terrorist supporter of Dearborn, had issued the orders to arrest what he referred to as intruders at the Islamic festival. (You see, we, and our American rights, are already intruders in our own country) "Contrary to the comments made by Chief Haddad, our Constitution does not allow police to ban the right of free speech just because there are some hecklers, not yet anyway. Bear in mind, this festival was open to the public, but Christians are apparently not part of the American public any more, and Dearborn police have burned the Constitution and the Bible in favor of the Quran and Sharia law.

Watch an Open video message to Chief Haddad from Pastor David wood, a must view.
Chief Ronald Haddad has been appointed by Napolitano to --- would you believe ---Homeland Security Advisory Council, read the article. It seems Haddad has done such a good job of implementing ‘Muslim terrorists Sharia law’ in Dearborn that Janet Napolitano wants Haddad to do the same --- nationally.

The Christian missionaries reported that police told them they would have to be five blocks away from the festival to give away copies of the Gospel of John. In other words one must take their right and go somewhere else with them.

The law center is also representing Pastor George Saeig, who was prohibited by the festival and police authorities from distributing religious material at last year's festival. That case is still ongoing. The federal appeals court did ruled prior to the 2010 event that handing out Christian literature in the proximity of the festival was allowed. But Islamic Sharia law of course, takes precedence over American Federal Law.

At least two people claim a crowd was jeering "Allahu Akbar!" while the Christians were led away in handcuffs for doing nothing more than engaging in peaceful dialogue and videotaping the event. Allahu Akbar is what terrorist yell while beheading you!

The American Arab Chamber of Commerce (note the corporate sponsors) announced the event which was expected to draw "over 300,000 people from across the country, Canada and the Middle East.” The festival covers 14 blocks and is free and open to the public, except Christians apparently.

All the Christian missionaries in question, are from a Christian group called Acts 17 Apologetics. Qureshi said people at the festival recognized his group from its visit in 2009. Last year, the Acts 17 Apologetics team was escorted from the grounds while being repeatedly physically assaulted by security personnel and several attendees.

This year, Qureshi said some attendees who recognized them "would come up to us, accusing us, threatening us, saying we were racists, saying they were going to hurt us and yelling curses and insults at us."

However, he said his group was able to engage in civil conversations with many people who initiated discussion. But then the group was arrested by local police. Each of the four has been released on bond.

"Paul, David, Negeen, and I went to the festival to see and comment on the situation," Qureshi wrote on his blog. "Thankfully, we recorded every second of our activity at the festival."

In Saieg's case, WorldNetDaily reported, a federal appeals court granted an emergency motion allowing him to hand out information about his faith at the same festival.

A three-judge panel from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, citing the precedent that even a minimal loss of a fundamental right is irreparable, granted the motion requested by the Thomas More Law Center on behalf of the Sudanese Christian.

Since their activities were carried out peacefully, State Representative Tom McMillin believes the missionaries were falsely arrested. Their cameras were seized, but police have refused to view the footage of their arrest or release a detailed report on the incident."I wonder if they're trying to craft a police report knowing that these videos show that nothing was done wrong," McMillin suggests. "And the illegal confiscation of the videos, I mean it really appears to be a lot of injustice. Now I could be surprised. Maybe they'll drop the charges and realize that the Constitution might apply in Michigan as well."

Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), said the missionaries' free-speech rights were violated, and he contends that no laws were broken.

"The next step, in what I call the enforcement of Sharia law in Dearborn, Michigan, is the arraignment that is going to take place in the Dearborn District Court," he explains.Representative McMillin plans to attend today's arraignment, but Thompson feels that one aspect of the case is already very clear. "This is the first step in a series of steps that the city of Dearborn is taking to placate the large Muslim population that they have there, and they don't mind stepping on the constitutional rights of Christians to do that," he notes.

What Westerners fail to recognize is that Islam does not appease or compromise, there is only one way and that is the way of Sharia for everyone, everywhere.

The TMLC president assures that his firm will vigorously fight for the missionaries' constitutional rights. As a part of that process, a lawsuit will be filed against the city in protest of what he refers to as their "illegal arrests" and for their equipment being confiscated. Meanwhile, McMillin will see what happens at the hearing.

"If they go forward with this charade and actually try and trump up charges, I certainly will be by the sides of the defendants," he assures. "I certainly will not sit silent."He hopes to draw a line in the sand against the efforts of those in Dearborn who want to squelch the free-speech rights of Christians who disagree with Islam.

Four missionaries arrested at an Arab festival in Dearborn, Michigan, have been arraigned.

The missionaries have appeared each year of the Annual Arab International Festival, but this year police moved in, arrested them, and confiscated a camera from one member was using to film the arrests. Detroit television station WXYZ was on hand for the arraignment and talked to one of the accused, Nabeel Qureshi. "Our we were going through the festival [was] to allow the people to approach us," he explains. "So we did not approach anyone to avoid charges of harassing."

All four are charged with disturbing the peace, but 18-year-old Nageen Mayel, was also charged with refusing to obey a police officer's order to stop filming. "I was scared," she told WXYZ-TV. "There was no reason for them to approach me, so my immediate reaction was fear of the unknown and why they were doing it."

All four missionaries plead not guilty today. They are represented by Robert Muise of the Thomas More Law Center, who points to the Constitution.

"If people are offended by the fact that they were preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to Muslims and trying to convert Muslims -- well, guess what, we have a First Amendment right," Muise points out. "This is a free society. It's not a police state.” Well…that’s a matter of interpretation or point of view isn’t it. From where I’m standing it is obviously a police State or we wouldn’t be having this Issue now would we?

As the four apparently head to trial, the Law Center is preparing a civil suit to be filed against the city of Dearborn.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus far the only difference between Great Britain and the U.S. on this issue is that in England the British courts refer all arrests made under Islamic law to an Islamic court even Brits. The U.S. already has several Sharia Courts. It is just a matter of time before America adopts the same oppressive procedures as merry ole England. This is the incredible incremental progression of the stealth infiltration of Islamic Jihad in America.

Bear in mind, Muslims do not believe that they are governed by our constitution or our laws. They are only governed by Sharia… Moreover they also believe that ‘we’ are governed by Sharia as well.

I get mail asking: How can this possibly happen? Because you elected a Communist Muslim as your president you big dummy, what did you expect? watch and listen again to Obama tell you himself that America is no longer a Christian Nation, it is an Islamic State and he is one of them. Sharia is here…Get rid of it, or get used to it my friend.

Have you got your Hijaab on… and how is your prayer rug inventory doing?

And oh, I hear that you Homosexuals might seriously think about going straight. You think Christians are intolerant; Wait till the Muslims get a hold of your head. You’ve got about five years to figure it out. After that…Well…you don’t want to know.

Trust me! You really don’t…

Try the “Straight and Narrow”, you will live longer.

Aaa… forever, actually…

de Andréa

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

NC Will Confiscate and Ban Firearms

When will the government stop trying to turn our country into a police State? They won’t… Not until they succeed.

By de Andréa

Washington DC, Chicago, New Orleans, San Francisco and many more have banned arms in violation of the U.S. and in some cases their own state constitutions. And now despite the recent Supreme Court ruling of the individual’s right under the Second Amendment and the common law of the right of self defense, the state of North Carolina has crushed the Second Amendment and put law abiding citizens in danger during an emergency.

North Carolina’s unconstitutional "Emergency Powers Gun law" prohibits individuals from carrying firearms and it blocks the sale of guns and ammunitions when the state government chooses to declare an "emergency.” Firearms are our only means of self-defense in times of chaos, crime and the endangerment of our families. This is what the City of New Orleans did after Katrina, they illegally and arbitrarily confiscated all guns, and as a result several people were killed with no means of self defense, or were robbed of everything they had left to survive on. Moreover, only after another Supreme Court ruling did they return some of the guns to their rightful owners.

The Second Amendment Foundation is now suing the state of North Carolina for destroying our Second Amendment rights and putting our lives and our families lives in danger.

During an emergency, is when citizens need the Second Amendment most. We all saw what happened during hurricane Katrina. The government confiscated all guns from law abiding Americans who only wanted to defend their homes and loved ones. Rampant crime and chaos erupted. Innocent people were murdered, raped, and left for dead. Criminals grabbed their guns, looted homes and terrorized families. Without guns regular Americans were left defenseless on the bayou. Ironically, our government told the residents of New Orleans they would be safer without guns.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the case brought by The Second Amendment Foundation known as McDonald vs. Chicago and determined that citizens have an inalienable right to bear arms and defend themselves. In a historic ruling, the court affirmed that the Second Amendment would be incorporated into states. The Second Amendment not only gives citizens the ability to defend themselves, it also protects Americans from OVERREACHING governments that seek to regulate freedom to extinction. Like any other task the government says it can handle, its outcome is always a GIGANTIC failure. Historically, the government has done a disastrous job at ensuring the safety of Americans. You should NOT trust the government to protect you.

Remember, when seconds count, police are at the very least, ‘minutes away’.

The recent victory in the Supreme Court was a hard won battle. Our Communist Muslim Dictator Obama and his leftie jackbooted Police State goons stooped to the lowest of lows using Chicago-style politics and thuggery to try and crush the Second Amendment. They resorted to fear mongering and threats to scare citizens into taking action against the case. Liberals rallied the media claiming gun ownership would result in nationwide gun violence. (The infamous “Blood in the Streets” tactic)

The only thing violent about guns is the criminals that illegally use them; moreover they don’t even obey gun laws or any other laws, that’s why they’re called criminals. Did you know that the states of Vermont and Alaska have no restrictive gun laws at all and they have the lowest violent crime rates in the country? Arizona has just joined the other two states, and coupled with their “illegal alien” law, watch their crime rate go down, down, down.

Thanks to your help, SAF was able to derail Obama's unconstitutional antigun agenda and overturn Chicago's gun ban at the Supreme Court. But the fight is far from over. Your help is needed to help fund the legal battle against the North Carolina legislature to make sure the Liberal freedom haters don't succeed in disarming America and leave us helpless against the crime of tyranny.

If the "Emergency Powers Gun Law" is not overturned, every other liberal state will find ways to create their own version of the Gun ban Law. This will annihilate all the hard work and grassroots activism that we have used to ensure that our Second Amendment Right and freedoms are protected. Soon the floodgates will open to overturn the recent Supreme Court ruling and eventually we will see a nationwide gun ban, possibly through an Obama UN treaty.

The "Emergency Powers Gun Law" is ILLEGAL. The Supreme Court just ruled that the Second Amendment MUST BE APPLIED AND UPHELD BY ALL STATES. "The Emergency Powers Gun Law" does not uphold the recent Supreme Court ruling; it has destroyed a hard earned victory for freedom across America. Through this lawsuit in North Carolina, it is intended to show that state emergency powers statutes that allow government officials to suspend fundamental civil rights, including the right to bear arms, are unconstitutional and therefore should be nullified. Citizens do not surrender their God given rights just because of a natural or man-made disaster, or especially, if a state just arbitrarily declares an emergency for whatever reason.

Protecting our rights is expensive and it's impossible to put a price tag on. This time freedom could cost up to a Million dollars to defend your Second Amendment rights in this challenge by North Carolina's "Emergency Powers Gun Ban.” SAF stands firmly committed to defend these rights and they are asking you to stand with them to help stop the anti-freedom America hating extremists now!

THE BOTTOM LINE: The purpose of the Second Amendment at the time of its writing was twofold, and contrary to public opinion one of them wasn’t for the purpose of hunting as president Clinton tried so eloquently to convince constitutionalists. The word “Hunting” isn’t even in the constitution or the amendment. Hunting was a given, it was survival. The twofold purpose was and still is, as it says “necessary for the security of a free State” and as common law, the right of personal self defense.

There is no other time to exercise ones Second Amendment rights but in an emergency. Why would one have the need to defend ones own freedom or ones own life except in an emergency? Any government that bans the people’s right to keep and bear arms is violating the most basic philosophy of Americanism and the most basic right to self-preservation, as well as the Framers intent of the personal security of ones freedom under the most extreme circumstances of an EMERGENCY


It has truly come to the point, that it is ‘us’ against the ‘criminal tyrannical government’. And soon even the Supreme Court will be totally corrupt as well.

Then the purpose of the Second Amendment will truly come into play. …”being necessary for the security of a free State the right of the people to keep and bear arms”… Your freedom will be on the line. Did you know that according to law, you’re your right “…shall not be infringed”, either.

Give your kid a hug today and join a ‘Militia’. It’s your God given inalienable right, to secure your life and your freedom.

May we seek God’s blessings by allowing Him to legally immigrate back into His own country, back into our government, back into our schools, back into our homes, back into His churches, and back into our lives…

The alternative is --- that we are totally on our own and God will not help us with that…

de Andréa

Monday, July 12, 2010

The Michigan Hezbollah

You’ve heard of the Lebanon Hezbollah…but the Michigan Hezbollah?
By de Andrae

I don’t know just what the fatal attraction the state of Michigan has for Muslim terrorists, but this state has more terrorist cells than the country of Afghanistan. This has been known by the residents of Dearborn for years but only recently has it wafted to the attention of the U.S. Congress.

So how do so many terrorists and illegal Muslims get into this country? Well…The same way they have always been getting into this country through the sieve of our southern border.

Do you think all those Mexicans illegally crossing the border into Arizona, New Mexico, California, and Texas are really all Mexicans? If it walks, talks, and looks like a duck, usually it’s a duck, right. But if it walks, talks, and looks like a Mexican it can also be a Middle Easterner and often it is. They’re called OTM’s, by the border guards, other than Mexican’s.

According to a Fox News report, U.S. Republican National Committee Rep. and chair of the congressional committee on counter terrorism Sue Myrick announced last week, that a Hezbollah terror cell is operating among drug cartels around the U.S.-Mexican border. Myrick requested that U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano create a special team to further investigate the potential problem and threat. This may be 20 or 30 years late, but…Oh well! Watch a video of Sue Myrich and News

The Republican representative referenced several incidents that show evidence of Hezbollah's efforts to infiltrate the U.S. region with the aid of Mexican drug cartel gangs, including the well funded and well connected infamous El Salvadorian gang Mara Salvatrucha or MS-13 Before invading the U.S. in the 1980’s MS-13 was a prison Mafia gang in El Salvador . "It is vital we know what is happening on our border, especially as crime and violence continue to rise there and as terrorist plots and threats are increasing inside the U.S.," quoted the Fox News report. Yes “vital” might be a good way to put it.

Myrick cited the warming relationship between Iran and Venezuela as proof that Hezbollah members may be collaborating with Latin American drug cartels, who may be utilizing Hezbollah's ability to dig underground tunnels for drug smuggling and in turn, providing funding, document forging, and false identities. “May” and “be” are not the operative words here, “is” is.

The Fox News report referenced Anthony Placido, assistant administrator for intelligence at the Drug Enforcement Administration, testifying at a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee in March this year, that some drug smugglers in the U.S.-Mexico region have had relationships with Hezbollah since the 1980s.

"There are numerous reports of cocaine proceeds entering the coffers of Islamic Radical Groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas," Fox News quoted Placido when he testified to the subcommittee. Placido labeled the proceeds as "easy revenue" that will be used to fund terrorism.

Fox News also cited a 2006 House Homeland Security Committee report which details incidents of Hezbollah operatives who were apprehended when trying to access the U.S. through Mexico. The report mentions Mahmoud Youssef Kourani, a Hezbollah member who pleaded guilty in 2005 for supplying information to the terror organization after he was smuggled in the U.S. through Mexico, and lived in Dearborn, Michigan.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I know that the border guards have known this Muslim connection for at least 20 years because I learned it from them more than 15 years ago, it was rediscovered when the citizens Minutemen began their aid to the border guards along the California and Arizona borders approximately 4 or 5 years ago.

What I have a difficult time understanding is the so-called U.S. intelligence agencies who really haven’t got a clue about the security of the United States of America. In other words what common ordinary people have known for decades the Fed is just now discovering.

Of course it is usually Rep. Sue Myrick that although 20 years late is on the leading edge of counter terrorism intelligence.

This my friend is why the State of Arizona has finely done what the Federal Government refuses to do and that is to protect at least their state if not the country from a foreign invasion, and in time of war.

Maybe this is why for 30 odd years the guards have be finding Hijaab’s, Quran’s, Hadith’s, and other Muslim paraphernalia strewn all over the desert near the border. Naw! Ya think?

We Americans must lead a charmed life. Or is it God that is still protecting us?, even though we have deported Him from our country.

Well it sure isn’t our Government that is protecting us…

de Andréa