Sunday, June 30, 2013

Uh - Oh! Obama’s CDC Gun Violence Study Proved “More Guns Less Crime”

Uh - Oh!  Obama’s CDC Gun Violence Study Proved “More Guns Less Crime”
But do you think that will change Obama’s direction?  Of course not, because gun control never has been about the truth or the control of guns, it’s about the control of people…and when that is the agenda, my friend, truth is irrelevant. 

By de Andréa
June 30, 2013

If you are one of those media indoctrinated people that believe weapons are the root of all evil and violence, well here is proof the media and the ‘Washington Bearucrats’ have been lying to you.  Because of a political agenda, you have been purposely misinformed my friend. And the safety of your children has been compromised.

Though FBI statistics that come out every two years have proved time and again that disarming a free people leads to more violent crime and the potential for mass government democide, it has not stopped the Fuehrer Barrack Hussein Obama and his Congressional tyrants in the Gestapo from doing everything in their power to make it impossible for Americans to legally own firearms.  As I said it’s about people control. 

Citing the Sandy Hook mass shooting last year, democrats led by Diane Feinstein have claimed that we must restrict gun ownership and strip the Second Amendment for the safety of our children and the general public.  When the truth is, that the more children that are killed in their designated GUN FREE ZONES the better it is for the tyrants.  They care nothing about your kids or they wouldn’t advertise GUN FREE ZONES as safe places for your kids, instead they know that they are safe havens for the crazies that want to kill them.

I learned as a child that one cannot hide the truth under a bushel, no, no, no.  Do you remember that children’s song? 

John Lott Jr made the mistake of trying to prove that “More Guns More Crime” but after an in-depth study the statistics proved the opposite in his book More Guns Less Crime.

Obama made the same mistake in ordering the CDC to do a study on Gun-Violence and Gun Restriction.  It too backfired but it won’t make a bit of difference to the direction that Obama’s gun restriction it taking, because the truth is irrelevant to the cause of citizen disarmament and tyranny.

The new report commissioned by the White House titled Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-related Violence suggests what many self defense gun proponents have been saying for years.  The report, ordered under one of President Obama’s 23 Executive Orders signed in the wake of the Sandy Hook incident regarding gun control, mistakenly asked the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Research Council and other federal agencies to identify the “most pressing problems in firearms violence.”

Just like John Lott, to the surprise of the authors and those who would no doubt have used the report to further restrict access to personal defense firearms, the study backfired on them, as lies will eventually do.  Obama’s study found that gun ownership actually saves lives and those who have a firearm at their disposal improve their chances of survival and reduce their chance of injury in the event they are confronted by a violent criminal.  Don’t you just love it when America’s freedom haters shoot themselves in the foot…

All national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least, if not more common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year…
The estimate of 3 million defensive uses per year is based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys. 

The former number of 108,000 used by the gun grabbers is difficult to interpret because respondents were of course not asked specifically about defensive gun use, which was the purpose of the survey.  By manipulating the question, for years they manipulated the result.  But not anymore my friend!  They have been found out…

A different issue is whether defensive use of guns, however numerous or rare they may be, are effective in preventing injury to the gun wielding crime victim.  Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was “used” by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self protective strategies.

Consider that 3 million people use a gun to defend themselves from harm every year.  This means that over 8,000 Americans every day act with potentially deadly force to prevent injury or death to themselves or a family member.  This comes from Obama’s study…woops!

In addition to overwhelming evidence that owning a gun reduces your chances of injury when attacked, regardless of whether you fire your gun or not, the new report proves that there has been a decades’ long obfuscation if not a down right criminal doctoring of national statistics that have been used to determine the importance of guns in self defense.  Up until this study became available, anti-gun politicians used their doctored and misleading figures that indicated that just 108,000 people a year used guns in self defense.  The new study suggests that those numbers were off by over 2500 percent.  Double Woops!

The Proof is in the putting as they say!
The new Whitehouse report coupled with evidence from: AustraliaBritain and Canada shows that a reduction of personal gun ownership is a road to more violence, injury and death.  Obama of course commissioned this study in the hopes of finding a reason to take ‘more’ guns from law abiding Americans.  Like John Lott Jr. what it found, however, is that the real answer to gun violence in America is… arming more Americans.  The state of Vermont, Arizona and Alaska have virtually no state gun restrictions and the lowest violent crime rate in the country as opposed to the state of New York with the highest gun restrictions and the highest gun crime per capita in the Nation.

This is why I say gun control advocates care nothing about gun violence or the death of your children, actually the more the better.  More proof of that was Diane Feinstein’s statement that she was “just biding her time until something like Columbine happened again” and then she would once again unleash her so-called assault-weapons ban; she salivated at the thought of another massacre like Columbine High School.  I’m sorry to say she got her wish at Sandy Hook, then she unleash he gun ban.  

So if you parents are really concerned about the safety of your children instead of just climbing aboard the anti-gun wagon then don’t send your kids to a GUN FREE ZONE, instead demand that they have at least as much armed protection as your money does in a bank, or’ flat out pull them out of school.

These Communist anti-American “Bill of Rights” haters are a blood thirsty lot, and will stop at nothing to bring about their agenda of total disarmament and oppressive dependency of all American citizens.  They will even sacrifice your children, note: I said ‘your’ children not theirs…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

26 Percent of Americans Say: ‘de Andréa’ Is A Terrorist

26 Percent of Americans Say: ‘de Andréa’ Is A Terrorist
Why do I say that?  Because I am a Tea Party Member and a Christian, according to the latest Rasmussen poll, 26 percent of Americans say “Tea Party members” and “Christians” are anti-American terrorists on a par with Muslim Jihadists.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2013

I asked myself…am I likely to commit a terrorist act?  Aaaaaa…………….no! 

However according to a new Rasmussen Reports poll, more than one in four voters who support President Obama believes the tea party is the biggest terror threat to the United States.  These of course are low information brainwashed voters!

The survey, conducted over the past weekend polled 1,000 voters.  It has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, with a 95 percent level of confidence.

It asks a number of questions about America’s security on topics including nuclear weapons, an anti-missile defense shield – and just exactly who is the nation’s top terror threat.

Twenty-six percent of Obama’s supporters say… well that would be the tea party – the grass-roots political effort to limit the size of government, get bureaucrats out of the average family’s life, and crack down on corruption and graft.  Now does that mean that all these people want bigger government and want government to control every thing they do as well as want more corruption in government?  Probably not, most are just low information people the rest are smoking too many funny cigarettes and are mesmerized and brainwashed. 

“Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the tea party than radical Muslim terrorists,” the survey report said.

The results of the survey
The telephone survey indicated 51 percent of U.S. voters think radical Muslims are the bigger threat today to the U.S. Thirteen percent put the tea party in that category, and another 13 percent say other political and religious extremists are the danger.  Six percent point to local “militia” groups, and 2 percent say Occupy Wall Street is the threat.  None say that Obama is the threat…as I said too many funny cigarettes…

“Among those who approve of the president’s job performance, just 29 percent see radical Muslims as the bigger threat.  Twenty-six percent say it’s the tea party that concerns them most.  Among those who strongly approve of the president, more fear the tea party than radical Muslims,” the report said.

“As for those who disapprove of Obama’s performance, 75 percent consider radical Muslims to be the bigger terrorist threat.  Just one percent names the tea party,” Rasmussen reported today.

Rasmussen reported that it was curious that even though the Occupy movement targeted the upper “1 percent” in the nation, members of that group “are more likely than others to see the tea party as the bigger terror threat.”

The report said conservatives “overwhelmingly” view radical Muslims as a danger while liberals are split between radical Muslims and the tea party.

A full one in five government workers “see the tea party as the nation’s bigger terror threat. Twelve percent of private sector workers hold that view.”

Two-thirds of the respondents believe terrorist groups soon will get nuclear weapons.  Half of that group believes it is very likely.  Well of course, Obama is making sure of that!

THE BOTTOM LINE: First, it isn’t 26 percent of the nation; it is 26 percent of those that are brain-dead Obama supporters.  This actually amounts to less than 14 percent of the Nation.  There are always going to be 10 to 20 percent of the people that are part of a group that are either media brainwashed or low’ or no’ information people.  Then, these polls are always skewed to reflect what the Pollster wants it to reflect. 

Trust me; I am not a terrorist, not yet’ anyway!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Pentagon Buying Russian Helicopters For Al-Qaida

Pentagon Buying Russian Helicopters For Al-Qaida
The Pentagon is again spending nearly a billion of your future tax dollars on 30 Russian helicopters and 18 Swiss planes for American trained Afghani Special Forces that after their training, attacked American soldiers.

By de Andréa
June 28, 2013

The Pentagon is supplying our enemy with military equipment.  These Jihadists who are supposedly charged with stopping terrorism and opium production even though the force only has a quarter of the personnel needed to fly and maintain the equipment, according to a new audit.  Moreover these are the Afghani forces - who after they were trained - turned around and attacked their American mentors.  Why? Because they are Muslim Jihadist working with al-Qaida.  The Pentagon doesn’t understand that, but Obama certainly does…

Folks, just a reminder, al-Qaida is the son’s of Satan that attacked us on 9/11 and are continuing to attack us and the jerk that you elected president is supporting them, doesn’t that bother you just a little?  

In his latest critical analysis of U.S. spending in Afghanistan of more than a 771 million, John F. Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, called on the Pentagon to immediately suspend the purchases, he raised questions about the initial $553 million contract with the Russian government.

First - Afghan forces are not ready to handle maintenance and operation of the aircraft but al-Qaida is.  And second - without an effective support structure, U.S.-funded Special Forces aircraft could be left sitting on runways in Afghanistan, or be used by al-Qaida rather than supporting U.S. interests, resulting in waste of U.S. funds.

The audit is Sopko's latest to draw attention the problems likely in Afghanistan once U.S. troops leave under President Obama's orders.  Overall, U.S. taxpayers are expected to pay over $1 billion to supply the aircraft and fund maintenance that will likely be used by terrorists.

Under the current plan, the Pentagon is replacing the air wing's aging force with 30 modified Russian Mi-17 helicopters and 18 Swiss-made PC-12 fixed wing aircraft.  The bulk of that contract, $553 million, is going to Russian firm Rosoboronexport. The contract to Rosoboronexport--the sole Russian government agency selling Russian-made defense items and military hardware.

Despite the purchases, the audit said that the Afghan force isn't close to being ready to operate it.  It has only 180 of the 806 the team needed to fly and maintain the aircraft.  For example, it currently has 42 pilots, but will need 188.  So who I ask is going to use it?  In addition the force is having trouble finding forces who can speak English, in part because al-Qaida pays better to those who can speak English.

"We question the wisdom of moving ahead with the provision of 30 new Mi-17s and 18 PC-12s unless these issues are properly addressed," said the audit.
In response, the Pentagon rejected the recommendations, claiming a delay would slow the development of the special operations forces.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Earlier I said:  The Pentagon doesn’t understand that, but Obama does…”  I said that because those at the Pentagon couldn’t possibly understand who and what Islam is if they are blind enough to supply the Afghanis with military weapons.  If they did they would know that as in every other similar case in history the weapons would find their way into enemy terrorist hands.  The only one who totally understands Islam here is Obama himself.  This is why your hard earned money and your kids money and your grandkids money is going to support the enemy of the United States and the free World.

Don’t believe what Obama says, believe what you see him doing!  Obama needs to be stopped big-time!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Obama: I Don’t Need No Stinking Warrants

Obama: I Don’t Need No Stinking Warrants
Well, Obama can’t even make it through a whole week without breaking the law and creating yet another scandal.

By de Andréa
June 29, 2013

Just to let you know the good folks at Judicial Watch never rest, they announced yesterday that they have obtained records from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) exposing yet another Obama scandal.  Millions more of your tax dollars have been spent by the agency on the warrantless collection and analysis of ‘your’ private financial transactions.  You could be one of them.

Thanks to Showden it was finely made public that the NSA has been collecting warrantless information on your social life, your private phone conversations, and every kind of data they can get their hands on and storing it forever to be used against you later.  The IRS has been involved in discriminatory actions and gathering information on those that believe in the U.S. Constitution, God and life and using it against them.  The Muslim Brotherhood organizations collecting money for Jihadist terrorists can easily obtain tax free 501c3 status but the Tea Party, an American constitutional advocacy group is denied.  

Below my friend is an objective/excuse for the Obama Regime for breaking yet another constitutional law, there is always an excuse but I don’t believe it for a moment.  Remember information is POWER and Obama wants it all! 

The excuse for the CFPB personal financial data collection program is in a document obtained by Judicial Watch entitled “INDEFINITE-DELIVERY INDEFINITY-QUANTITY (IDIQ) STATEMENT OF WORK.” 

According to the IDIQ document’s stated Objective: “The CFPB seeks to acquire and maintain a nationally representative panel of credit information on consumers for use in a wide range of policy research projects…  The panel shall be a random sample of consumer credit files obtained from a national database of credit files.”  That may be what they are doing, but a wide range of policy research projects is not an objective.  The truth is the objective is more power and control folks.

To accomplish this so-called objective, the CFPB describes the scope of the program accordingly:  “The panel shall include 5 million consumers, and joint borrowers, co-signers, and authorized users.  The initial panel shall contain 10 years of historical data on a quarterly basis.  The initial sample shall be drawn from current records and historical data appended for that sample as well as additional samples during the intervening years to make the combined sample representative at each point in time.” 

The CFPB data collection program has been highly controversial since the April 2013 hearing, when Cordray disclosed elements of the venture at a Senate Banking Committee hearing.  At the time, the US Chamber of Commerce accused the CFPB of breaking the law by demanding the account-level data without a warrant or National Security Letter. 

Did you notice that no where in the so-called OBJECTIVE was there an objective, the reason, the goal, the purpose etc.  The document carefully avoided that, it only documented what they are doing, not why or what they are using it for.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said,“the Obama administration’s warrantless collection of the private financial information of millions of Americans is mind-blowing.  Is there anything that this administration thinks it can’t do?  These documents show that the Consumer Financial Protection Board is an out-of-control government agency that threatens the fundamental privacy and financial security of Americans.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:  I can say it with much more gusto: The whole bloody government is out of control.  And why is’ that you might ask?  Because “WE THE PEOPLE” who are suppose to be in control’ of the government, are more interested in what kim kardashian is doing, than what the government is doing, that’s why!

Wake up and smell the garbage!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Polygamy: The ‘New’ Social Fad

Polygamy: The ‘New’ Social Fad
The gay marriage issue is now so’ yesterday; guess what’s on the horizon next ‘my friend’.

By de Andréa
June 26, 2013

This is a perfect example of what twisted minds and twisted spirituality can produce.  The Supreme Court is becoming worse than useless, moreover it is totally without vision!  

On the heels of the recent SCOTUS’ decision on DOMA, is the open door for legalizing polygamy, bestiality and who knows what’s next.

Thom Hartmann talks with Mark Henkel, a self-proclaimed so-called Christian from the State of Maine.  Hinkel is Polygamy rights advocate and founder of    FYI…their slogan is “bringing Christian Polygamy to the Christian Church.”  This is not Mormonism my friend, this is even more difficult for me to swallow than “Chrislam”.

Website:, who advocates the decriminalization of polygamy in the U.S.

So with the Gay Marriage Issue now settled by the useless “politically correct Supreme Court”, it will soon be a distant memory.  But the morally bankrupted growing minority who runs America will soon be embarking on yet another twisted bit of social garbage, ‘polygamy’.  Then in five or ten years what is to prevent the people of the dark from moving on to yet another tool of demonic influence, Zoophilia  or Bestiality

THE BOTTOM LINE:  I don’t even want to imagine what is next after that, but I am sure the garbage heads of society will dream up some kind of demonic nightmare.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Obama Supports Our enemy With Your Money

 Obama Supports Our Enemy With Your Money
In the past, at the risk of my own credibility, I have stated that Obama is a Muslim sleeper terrorist supporter.  Many scoffed and called me a racist and a conspiracy nut, all while; this was going on right before our eyes.  Moreover it has not stopped and it won’t until you stop it.

I am writing this article for all of you low information people out in the ether that are brainwashed by receiving all your news from the government controlled alphabet media.  This so reminds me of the Soviet TASS News Agency, where the Russian people had no idea what was going on in their own country.

By de Andréa
June 26, 2013

What are we to make of Obama again finding another $250 million to give to the enemy of the free world during a supposedly devastating sequester?  Has Obama miraculously parted a sea of red ink?  No…with more than 16 trillion in debts one cannot say we even have the money to give to the very enemy who attacked us on 9/11 and killed more than three thousand American citizens.  And no one can say that Secretary of State John Kerry isn't predictable in his first weeks as Obama’s water-boy and the nation's chief diplomat.

Kerry the ex-Vietnam protester, who contemptuously threw his medals on the steps of the U.S. Capitol four decades ago, is giving the new post-Arab Spring Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist leader Mohammed Morsi another $250 million in immediate foreign aid, termed "economic assistance.”  This comes after $450 million in so-called "emergency aid" last year, including dozens of F-16 jet fighters, so those in the land of the pharaohs can again make slaves out of the Israelis.

While dictator Obama has been condemning Republicans for automatic spending cuts now in effect because of a budget sequestration mechanism that was Obama’s idea in the first place, as Washington Post's Bob Woodward recently pointed out, Obama is busy carrying out his agenda of supporting Muslim terrorists both here and abroad.

He's been claiming the sequester means: "thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off, and tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids, an aircraft carrier can't be sent to the Persian Gulf; almost 800,000 defense employees will be laid off and rendered idle; and these cuts will set back medical science for a generation."  And most importantly there is no money for school children to visit the Whitehouse to see what is really going on behind those closed doors.

He has been using sequester rhetoric to batter Republicans.  "Are Republicans in Congress really willing to let these cuts fall on our kids' schools and mental health care ... to slash military health care and the Border Patrol ... to inflict more pain on the middle class?"  He asks, adding that: "the American people have worked too hard for too long to see everything they've built undone by partisan recklessness in Washington."

After his repeated trillion-dollar deficits and over $16.6 trillion in national debt, Obama lies with a straight face about how "we should work together to build on the more than $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction we've already achieved."

Yet somehow he can instantly find yet an additional quarter of a billion dollars to give to an Egyptian government controlled by an organization dedicated to "civilizational jihad" and the genocide of us infidels — spreading barbaric Shariah law politically by destroying Western civilization from within.  Well of course he can, because it is a matter of priorities.  The priorities being the treasonous support of America’s enemy and the Qu’ranic murder of Egyptian Coptic Christians!

Obama is overriding congress giving another $250 million to an Egyptian president who calls Jews "blood-suckers" and who are referred to as "descendants of apes and pigs".  Morsi unequivocally supports the Iranian-backed Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, and he calls on fellow Muslims to "besiege the Zionists wherever they are, striking them on the neck and killing them wherever you find them…" a typical quote from the Quran and the religion of peace.

Nothing has exposed the truth about Obama’s Chicken Little sequester rhetoric like these billions in taxpayer cash that we don’t have so Obama can continue to carry out his agenda of Islamic world supremacism and domination.

Secretary of State John Kerry announced Sunday that the United States would provide another $250 million in assistance to Egypt after Egypt’s president promised to move ahead with negotiations with the International Monetary Fund over economic reforms.

Secretary of State John Kerry departed Cairo after meeting with President Mohamed Morsi of Egypt and announcing $250 million in aid from the U.S.  And if you think this is an isolated case, or it has never happened before…well you would be wrong about that as well…this also happened with Hillary Clinton.  

During a trip through Colorado in December of last year, President Obama spoke of his intention to implement his economic policies with or without the approval of Congress. Said Obama, spoken like a true dictator Obama said, “And where Congress is not willing to act, we’re going to go ahead and do it ourselves.”  It now appears that such a mindset applies not only to economic matters but to the distribution of foreign aid as well--in particular, foreign military aid for the Muslim Brotherhood, who has held the reigns in Egypt since the beginning of the so-called Arab Spring.

Congress has restricted and, in fact, halted military aid to Egypt until and “unless the State Department certifies that Egypt is making progress on basic freedoms and human rights.”  After all, Christians and other practitioners of non-Islamic religions have had a tough go of it there.  And of course, many Egyptian officials harbor such hatred toward the U.S. that Mohammed Morsi and other candidates have openly referred to America as the “infidel country” in media interviews.

Nevertheless, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that President Obama will resume funding for Egypt’s Brotherhood military, despite Congressional restrictions and objections from human rights and democracy advocates.”

Even Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT), a man with whom I’ve never agreed on anything, sees the foolishness of this endeavor: “I believe [sending the aid] would be a mistake.  The new [restrictions were] intended to put the United States squarely on the side of the Egyptian people who seek a civilian government that respects fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, and to clearly define the terms of our future relations with the Egyptian military.”

Obama has also circumvented Congress and gave Hamas, al-Qaida and Hisbala some advanced weaponry?  (Please watch this video)  Obama has given so far a total of $1.5 billion in money and military aid to his partners the Muslim Brotherhood, the enemy of the free world.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I know this all sounds crazy, but it is all documented fact my friend, I can truly see Obama giving the Iranians some nuclear materials in the near future that would put the barbaric supremacist Nation of Islam on near equal military footing with Israel and the United States. 

If you are capable of comprehending this and all its ramifications, then you cannot deny that Obama has committed treason by supporting our enemy with your money.

Totally tantamount to supporting Nazism during the Second World War, do you think for one moment that, that would have ever gone unnoticed???

Then why this…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Oh! Ca-Can The War Be Over Now

Oh!  Ca-Can The War Be Over Now
The Jihad war rages on, but the War on Terror is over, we have traded it in for the war on conservative patriots and Christians.

By de Andréa
June 25, 2013

There is no longer a national-security consensus — no longer the political support for wartime defense measures, much less offensive combat operations.  While our enemy continues to fight, our will to defend ourselves and/or break the enemy’s back has vanished.  After a contentious week, that much is clear.

The controversy swirling around the shadowy intelligence programs hasn’t gotten to the bottom of those programs, but it tells us everything we need to know about. . .us and well…our government and where were going.

At the risk of using a worn out metaphor, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s dog that did not bark is like no other to describe this week, though, the lack of a bark was loud and clear.  For a variety of reasons, many of the protagonists have developed amnesia about how we came to have the programs now provoking all the cage rattling: the debates over the PATRIOT Act and FISA (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) and the IRS.  In the end will anything be done about it?  No!

After a series of attacks through the Nineties, which we all but ignored, then the 9/11 atrocities destroyed the World Trade Center, struck the Pentagon, and killed nearly 3,000 Americans.  In that savage clarity, our nation finally realized that what I’ve called “kinetic fundamental Islam” — a combination of militant Jihadists and their Sharia-supremacist enablers — was at war with the United States, this was not a religion of peace but that became a distorted view of religious rights.  The PATRIOT Act was a product of our vigorous and persuasive contention, on the national-security right, that the challenge was an enemy force, not a criminal-justice problem.  That challenge demanded a national war-footing, not a judicial due-process.

It was precisely this contention, moreover, that beat back the Left’s effort to intrude the Judiciary into the collection of foreign intelligence— constitutionally, a paradigm executive function when Obama overhauled FISA in 2009.

In fits and starts over the years, progressives and libertarians have aligned against the war, for different reasons.  Programmed as well as hardwired to find American fault in every dispute, the Left is sympathetic to Islamic supremacist’s indictment against the United States, if not its barbaric methods.  Libertarians have been wary because war inexorably enhances the power of the state at the expense of liberty — big Government might be more to be feared than Islamic Jihad.

That this fear is overstated does not mean it is frivolous.  It is real, and has been stoked to a fare-thee-well by the so-called “War on Terror.”  The label itself betrays our cravenness.  Unwilling to name the enemy for fear of giving offense, Obama may have framed the challenge not as an aggressor but as an aggressive tactic but Obama said we are certainly not at war with Islam, and who would challenge him except me.  It encouraged Americans to go on with their lives as normal (lest “the terrorists win”).

Necessarily, this ensured that the public would notice the war only in the government’s defense measures against the tactic.  These were thus certain to become more onerous; after all that was how politicians too timid to say “Islam” or “Jihad” proved they were tough on . . . er . . . a’…“violent extremism.” 

But these defense measures, erosions of liberty and privacy, could be abided only as long as the public felt profoundly threatened.  That feeling would certainly not last, no matter how long we had troops on faraway battlefields.  If the public was not (a) invested in victory over our enemies; (b) persuaded that being molested at the airport and similar indignities had something to do with achieving victory; and (c) convinced that the lack of similar-scale attacks in the years after 9/11 was due to our defense measures.

The most compelling claim against the war effort, argued jointly by progressives and libertarians, was that there was no conceivable conclusion to a war of this nature.  Wars against traditional enemies end when the enemy — usually, a nation-state — surrenders or strikes a treaty.  But how can a war against a tactic end?  It doesn’t…

Consequently, the argument went, the War on Terror would go on indefinitely, and with it the metastasizing security state.  This argument is now muted on the Left.  Bush-deranged progressives turn out to be quite comfortable with a security state as long as one of their own is running it.  But now that the left is in charge, for libertarians the argument has grown ever more heated.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Nothing, not even war, happens in a vacuum.  Over the last six years, as libertarian and conservative angst churned over surveillance, detention, military commissions, and drone attacks, the progressive-lite GOP establishment gave way to hardcore Obama statism; as I said, we have traded in the war against terror, for the war on conservative patriots and Christians.  As a result, libertarians, quite appropriately, have become a hugely influential opposition faction.  They are a big part of the Tea Party’s energy, and the Tea Party is the dynamo of the Right.  Increasingly, as the Right’s ne plus ultra has become stopping Big Government’s advance, conservatives and Republicans have been more willing to overlook libertarian objections to adhesive security measures — sometimes, even to see a good deal of sense in them.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Bloom‘bug’ Says Boston Bomber A Victim Of Gun Violence

NYC Mayor Bloom‘bug’ Says Boston Bomber A Victim Of Gun Violence
This anti-American Nazi criminal has revealed his true colors; Bloomhead has listed a Muslim terrorist as the ‘VICTIM’ of gun violence.  This bakes the cake!

By de Andréa
June 20, 2013

Naming the Boston Marathon bombers as victims of gun violence because they were shot by police shows just how morally bankrupt and anti-American Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun “No More Names” national bus tour really is.

At a Tuesday rally in Concord, N.H., event organizers read the names of shooting victims since the Sandy Hook attack last Dec. 14.  Among the names of the dead was Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the marathon bomber.  When his name was read, people in the audience declared, “He’s a terrorist,” according to published reports.

“This is so far beyond insulting, I'm not sure there’s a word in the dictionary to describe it,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb.  “It clearly demonstrates that Michael Bloomberg’s gun prohibition effort will exploit even the names of dead terror suspects to further his anti-gun agenda.  That’s a new low that I didn't think was possible.”

Tsarnaev was fatally shot by police a few nights after the marathon bombing.  His brother was wounded and is now in police custody.  The names of the Marathon bombing victims were not read because they were not victims of gun violence, only the perpetrators were.  Do things seem just a little backwards and upside down to you?  Alan’s right, there just isn’t a word for this. 

“If Bloomberg and his Mayors Against Guns are willing to make a martyr of a terror suspect to push their agenda,” Gottlieb observed, “it raises questions about the legitimacy of their campaign to disarm America, one legislative step at a time.  Next thing you know, they'll be calling Osama bin Laden a victim of gun violence, too.

Bloomberg is spending millions of his dollars to push his vision of a despotic America onto the backs of every citizen.  He thinks his billions give him the right to take away you constitutional rights, dictate how much soda you can drink, what you do with your garbage, and take away your Second Amendment rights.  Now it’s clear that Bloomberg’s anti American Nazi gun prohibition lobby has no moral conscience and no shame at all.  And these people want to dictate morality to us? 

I say: “Bring back the House task force on Un-American activities...  

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

House Defunds The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty

House Defunds The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty 

This does not mean that the UN cannot destroy our constitutionally guaranteed freedom; it simply means that Congress is not going to pay for it.  Only you' can stop it and save what is left of your rights and freedom…

By de Andréa
June 20, 2013

Don’t be fooled because your favorite alphabet TV News Network hasn’t made this ‘Breaking News’, much less broadcast the truth about this fraud.  The proponents of this railroad job hope you never hear about these arms treaties until it is too late.

Last Thursday the House of Representatives passed next year's defense appropriations bill - the National Defense Authorization Act FY 2014 - with 315 yays and 108 nays; but at the same time they also agreed to defund the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.  The amendment, was sponsored by U.S. Representative Mike Kelly (R-Pa), it passed unanimously and blocks all taxpayer dollars from being used to fund the Global Arms Treaty for the next fiscal year.

These treaties themselves would eventually disarm all American citizens, and ultimately disarm the Nations of the world giving all military power to the UN. 

On the House Floor, the Pennsylvania Rep. said that the treaty "undermines our Second Amendment rights by omitting the fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms" through its language that imposes national "responsibility" to prevent so-called firearms "diversion.” 

Kelly also noted that the treaty infringes upon the sovereignty of the United States as nation.  These are code words used to avoid telling you that the treaty would ultimately disarm the American military as well as its citizens. 

Please understand that while this amendment is a step in the right direction and a signal that there is mounting opposition against the Arms Trade Treaty, the fact is, the House can't prevent us from walking straight into this United Nations power grabbing scheme ... all treaties are decided by the President and the Senate only! 

Once Barack Obama signs his name to this international agreement - something that Secretary of State John Kerry already signaled that he is itching to do - it is then in the Senate's power only, to ratify or reject this globalist agreement - a stepping-stone to total disarmament of individuals and nations worldwide.  We simply can not allow that to happen!  We must demand the Senate to choose the second option. 

Take action and sign the petition and send a message to your U.S. Senators free.

 So far seventy-two nations have added signatures to the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty since June 3rd.  All in the name of safety and stopping crime
remember Hitler successfully did the same thing. 

This said, it is only a matter of time before Barack Obama adds his signature to this international gun-control agreement. 

The good news is that Obama's signature is so far only symbolic without the consent of the United States Senate.  This is to say that even if Obama adds his signature to the treaty - something he and many gun-grabbers are anticipating him to do - the United States will not yet be bound by its language. 

The real battle is in the United States Senate - the body that does have the power to ratify and adopt international treaties.  If the Upper Chamber of Congress accepts the Arms Trade Treaty then, and only then, will we be bound by the globalist language that the treaty contains. 

If we want to remain a sovereign and free independent nation under Constitutional rule, it is absolutely imperative that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty be rejected at all costs. 

Should Barack Obama's signing spark 
Majority Leader Harry Reid to bring the treaty to a vote in the coming days, we must urge the Senate right now to vote against it! 

Just like
the United Nations Small Arms Treaty,(sign petition here), this Global Treaty is incompatible with the Second Amendment to the Constitution... despite what its criminal advocates claim. 

The Treaty would provide the United States Executive sweeping powers to regulate which guns can and cannot enter or exit our country.  Further, this treaty is a stepping-stone to a mandatory international gun-registry and future total confiscation. 

Senator Mike Lee of Utah, one of thirty-four Senators who voted on a resolution in April opposing the Arms Trade Treaty, says that he will block the anti-gun U.N. effort "as long as he is breathing in the U.S. Senate." 

In a statement, Sen. Lee said: "I have great concerns that this treaty can be used to violate the second amendment rights of American citizens, and do not believe we should sign any treaty that infringes on the sovereignty of our country." 

Senator James Inhofe has committed to oppose this treaty's ratification.  The Oklahoma Senator says, "The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty that passed in the General Assembly ... would require the United States to implement gun-control legislation as required by the treaty, which could supersede the laws of our elected officials.  It's time the Obama administration recognizes it is already a non-starter, and Americans will not stand for internationalists limiting and infringing upon their Constitutional rights." 

Senate gun-grabbers are not a small minority - in fact, we have already witnessed their full-fledge assault on our right to keep and bear arms this year!  We know that there are plenty of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle that lack common sense and think that increased gun-control is "common sense" and that ignoring our God-given, constitutionally-protected liberty is acceptable. 

When the
"Safe Schools, Safe Communities" gun-control bill was tabled in April, we remember that Mr. Reid said that it's only a matter of time before he brings gun-control legislation back to the Senate floor. 

The fact is, Senate gun-grabbers are far from retiring their agenda, and this dangerous U.N. treaty - which so many falsely claim is innocuous - would greatly aid them in their illegal and unconstitutional cause to disarm the nation and bring about their despotic regime. 

The Senate needs a 2/3 majority to adopt this treaty, and as Barack Obama adds his signature of approval we must make sure that we are doing all we can to stop the Senate from doing the same. 

Like the United Nations Small Arms Treaty, this Arms Trade Treaty can and must be defeated!  Will you  
call Senate offices, and sign the petition to stop this attack on our right to keep and bear arms? 

Remember, gun control in not about controlling guns, it’s about controlling people!

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Syria’s Assad Saves a Few Christians From Obama’s Paid Terrorists

Syria’s Assad Saves a Few Christians From Obama’s Paid Terrorists

This is interesting:  Obama sends 40 million of your tax dollars to al-Qaida so they can kill a whole Christian populated town in Syria.  I thought the U.S. was at war with al-Qaida…but Obama is obviously at war with Christians.  Doesn’t that make Obama my ENEMY and the enemy of America?

By de Andréa
June 19, 2013

Your government has been lying to you about Tanzania, Libya, Egypt, and Syria, well actually…the whole Islamic Nation, and those that aren’t directly lying to you are believing and parroting the lies.

According to Fars New Agency -  Members of the Free Syrian Army  (FSA)  attacked the Christian-dominated al-Duvair village in Reef on the outskirts of Homs Syria on Monday, where they nearly massacred all of its inhabitants, including women and children before the Syrian Army loyal to Bashar al Assad intervened on behalf of the Christians.  Assad may just be the lesser of two evils as they say.

This is Jabhat al-Nusra, the same branch of al-Qaeda that fought attacked us on 9/11, and killed American and allied troops in Iraq, and now with Obama’s support they have positioned themselves in Syria, they control the rebel movement, and they kill Christians by the thousands.

The U.S. and other Western governments are backing the so-called FSA, Free Syrian Army.  While they have acknowledged the presence of al-Qaida Jihadists they still insist they’re only a small part of the rebel movement.  These are the same blind deceived idiots, that for some unknown reason want to believe that Islam is a peaceful religion except for just a very few radicals that we seem never to run out of.  While the truth is, al-Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups have been at the fore-front of the rebel movement since day-one of the Syrian war that began more than two years ago.  As I have so often said, if your want the truth you must go outside the U.S. to get it, you just cant’ trust the biased American politically correct communist news agencies.  So…according to German intelligence, 95 percent of the so-called Syrian rebels are from terrorist groups such as al-Qaida and’ they aren’t even Syrian.  The so-called rebel groups fighting against the Assad regime are composed mainly of members of al-Qaeda and the al-Qaeda affiliated groups have committed war crimes and atrocities in the past.

Obama’s Arab Spring
This is the lie that Obama would have you believe…It’s the same lie he used to support Libya and Egypt and they’ are now controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.  He said, “We must help the rebels against these dictators, we must help them overthrow the regimes and bring democracy to the Middle EastAnd yet the normally Obama supporting New York Times reported last month.   “Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a so-called democratic secular fighting force to speak of,”   Got more news for you my friend, they don’t exist in Libya or Egypt either, and they never did.  Obama is supporting Terrorist Islamic Jihad in the Middle East and in America.  Our enemies are Obama and his Jihadist Allies.

In April, Abou Mohamad al-Joulani, the head of al-Nusra, the rebel group in Syria pledged allegiance to Ayman al-Zawahri, the head of al-Qaeda.  Members of the Obama supported FSA have admitted that their plan is to institute sharia law, and the rebels now have a brigade named the Osama bin Laden Brigade.  Obama claimed that he killed Osama bin Laden, so they should name it the Barack Hussein Obama Brigade.

Despite the evidence of al-Qaeda control in Syria, Obama continues to support the so-called Free Syrian Army.  The FSA is not interested in freedom or democracy; it is interested in the barbaric institution of Islamic Jihad!

The ignorant and the decieved
Last week, Sens. Robert Menendez, D.-N.J., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn., ignorantly drafted a bill that, if passed, would officially arm al-Qaida with lethal weaponry.  On Monday, Sen. John McCain made a surprise visit to Syria where he met with Gen. Salem Idris, the leader of the Supreme Military Council of the FSA. McCain has also ignorantly called for arming the rebels as well as direct U.S. military intervention in the war.  And what about the WMD attack by Assad?  Well try this…Washington approved' plan to stage Syria chemical attack

THE BOTTOM LINE:  So, while you were watching reruns of Honey Boo Boo, your president was selling you out to your enemy, the same exact enemy who attacked us on 9/11.  Who is the traitor, who has committed treason, Ed Snowden or Barack Obama?

In one of the first paragraphs of the war collage manual it says: “Know who your enemy is”.  I know who our enemy is…it’s Barack Hussein Obama, the new leader of the Muslim Brotherhood - al-Qaida support group.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.