Friday, August 28, 2009

Is Obamacare Constitutional ???

Of course it isn’t, but this is no longer a Constitutional Republic. We are looking into the ugly face of an Islamic Communist Theocratic Dictatorship

By de Andréa

These are no longer your representatives:
Whether the people want a government dependant healthcare system or not, is of no interest to the representatives of the new Socialist America.

The question is…Is a federal government takeover of the health care system constitutional in the old America of the past that we have come to know and love?

Under The Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of 1791, Congress is not authorized to regulate or subsidize health care, making even ‘Medicare’ and ‘Social Security’ unconstitutional.

Michael Boldin, founder of The Tenth Amendment Center, said that if citizens want to understand whether health care is constitutional, they must first understand the function of the Constitution. "The best way to look at it is that it doesn't apply to you," he said. “The constitution doesn't apply to me. It doesn't apply to any person at all. It applies to the government; moreover, it sets the boundaries of what the Federal Government can and cannot do."

Enumerated powers
In debating whether health care is constitutional, citizens must look to the founding document to --- (1) determine whether the power is specifically listed there, or – (2) if there isn't a specific power listed, look to the "Necessary and Proper Clause," or Article I, Section 8, clause 18.
Article I, Section 8, specifically lists the following powers granted to Congress:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout
the United States; To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of
the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries; To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union,
suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of
training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
'Necessary and proper'
The last power, dubbed the "Necessary and Proper Clause," does not grant the federal government unlimited authority, but gives it some leeway for certain things – only as long as those actions apply directly to the Constitution's specifically enumerated powers.

A good example of a necessary and proper power in action is the authority to establish post offices listed in Clause 7.

Article I, Section 8, gives the federal government the power to build post offices, But it doesn't specifically state that it can go out and buy land to build post offices or hire labor to build post offices. Those actions would be necessary and proper and, more importantly, lesser than the main power. So, if they were only able to create a post office, but they couldn't buy the land or the tools or the labor to do it, they'd never get the post office built.

When you think of what is necessary and proper to carry out a specifically listed or enumerated power, it has to meet two criteria: It has to be directly applicable, and it also has to be lesser than the enumerated power.

'General welfare'
Some critics point to the "general welfare" stipulation in Clause 1 as a key provision granting the federal government the authority to regulate health care. However, in The Federalist No. 41, James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," argued that "general welfare" in Clause 1 does not give the federal government unlimited power, rendering each of the following clauses redundant.

Madison asked rhetorically, "For what purpose could the enumeration of particular powers be inserted, if these and all others were meant to be included in the preceding general power? He continued, "Nothing is more natural nor more common than first to use a general phrase, and then to explain and qualify it by a recital of particulars."

Madison sought to address concerns of critics who warned that the "general welfare" clause opened the door to unlimited abuse.

The Federalist Papers were public arguments to try to convince people to ratify the Constitution. They weren't just writing about the general welfare clause for the heck of it. There was a real concern by people who were opposed to the Constitution that the general welfare clause would give this unlimited power to the federal government to do whatever it claimed would 'support the general welfare.

Referencing the "general welfare" concerns, Madison even accused critics of "labour[ing] for objections" by "stooping to such a misconstruction."

It wasn't just the opponents of the Constitution saying there had to be limits to this. It was the proponents of the Constitution who were saying, in order for it to be general welfare, it must apply to one of the enumerated powers

No federal authority
Because the power to regulate each citizen's medical care is not included among enumerated powers, and neither is Social Security. The federal government does not have the authority to impose a single-payer system. You have to look to the Constitution and ask, 'Is health care listed? The answer is an emphatic No! It's not. Is health care directly necessary and proper to carrying out any of the listed powers such as creating post offices and national defense? No it is not!!!.

Furthermore the 10th Amendment, which states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”

While the government has overstepped its bounds in many cases and used the federal government in violation of the 10th Amendment, that provision must not be ignored.

No one has ever repealed the 10th Amendment . They do it by judicial fiat, but nonetheless it still exists."

'Equal Protection Clause' of 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Some proponents of federal health care have argued that every citizen must be treated equally, and the current health care system is an example of gross inequality that runs contrary to principles of the 14th Amendment. They say wealthy people are able to afford and obtain medical treatment while the less fortunate are left to suffer when they are unable to pay for an operation or treatment.

That argument would lead to a slippery slope where you could say everyone should have the exact same car. Then we should have the same guarantee of transportation to get to work, the same guarantee of food and shelter. Should we all have equal homes? I mean, if someone wants to make that argument, they have to make some serious changes to the Constitution to authorize it. Not only that, America would not exist as a free capitalistic country, it would instead be a Socialist Dictatorship, could this be the purpose and direction we are heading?

Regardless of their political affiliation or position on health care, citizens must ask themselves whether they truly want a government that has no limits.

No matter what side you are on, you don't want a government that can do whatever it wants whenever it wants because it becomes dangerous. This is what the Founding Fathers and the entire founding generation had to fight against – a king who could set his own rules and make them up as he goes. Rules may not be a wonderful thing, but when you allow government to do whatever it wants, you have the assurance of tyranny.

President Gerald Ford once said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.”

Amending the Constitution
Some critics say the Constitution was meant to be a "living document" that would adapt to changing times and since health care is a modern-day issue the Founding Fathers could not have foreseen, they argue, the federal government must step in and provide a single-payer system. I find it interesting that they didn’t have health problems in the 1700’s.

With regard to the "living document" argument, that is what the amendment process is for. However, he said, lawmakers won't propose a health care amendment because they know it will not pass.

They just don't propose it because, if they did, that would make it a much more serious discussion. The discussion wouldn't just be about helping the poor people – which is obviously a good motive for the people who really believe that. .Instead, the discussion would be about the proper role of the government, which is the whole point. Should it be involved in this at all?

States rights move to nullify federal health care
Activists and state legislators are now focusing their efforts on state governments as a way to resist federal health care "reform" and stop federal usurpation of state rights. According to the Tenth Amendment Center, lawmakers in as many as 10 states are considering or seeking to propose bills and resolutions to nullify federal health care in their states. This may be our only alternative, to exercise our constitutional rights to the point of session.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This whole issue of whether or not ‘Federal Health Care’ may or may not be constitutional, may be a moot point since this new Social Communist administration of Obama totally ignores the fact the Constitution of the United States of America even exists.

In case you missed my article titled The House Health Care Bill It is a must read.

Something to watch for:
The banning of the US Constitution in schools by the Department of Indoctrination…Excuse me I meant to say, the Department of Education.

No I didn’t…

de Andréa

Monday, August 24, 2009

Obama’s Kenyan Birth Certificate???

According to Obama, he was born in Hawaii at two different hospitals at two different times, with different names and now he was born in Mombassa Kenya. I’m confused…Who is our president again?

By de Andréa

He’s back
A man who had claimed to have a copy of President Obama's Kenyan birth certificate, and attempted to sell it on eBay then disappeared has reappeared, this time with a video of the document he claims proves Obama's Kenyan birth.

Well, I’ll tell you what, it looks more authentic than the one he displays on his web site, with virtually no information on it whatsoever.

Lucas Smith, a former resident of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and known by the E-Bay handle of "colmado_noranja," claimed to have an authentic document from Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombassa showing Obama's birth there at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961.

After promising to reveal the document to the news agency Worldnetdaily, Smith then dropped communications with a team of people offering to help him verify the document, only fueling belief that the sale – and therefore the alleged document – was a scam.

Since then however, various images have appeared online, purported to be Obama's original birth certificate. Lucas Smith, still claims he has an authentic Obama birth certificate from Mombassa. A video of him showing the document – which includes a close-up shot of the document's raised seal and the alleged footprint of Barack Obama – appears below:

"My name is Lucas Smith, an American," the video states. "This is the birth certificate of Barack Obama."

In the video, Smith points to several features of the certificate, including information still unknown about the sitting president, such as the name of the attending physician at his birth – James O. W. Ang'awa, the video also shows a stamp suggesting – if legitimate – that Smith obtained the document on Feb. 19, 2009.

Smith, a buyer and seller of historical antiquities, attempted several times to sell the document, or photos and stories surrounding it, on E-Bay, only to have the auctions repeatedly removed by site administrators.

‘WorldnetDaily’ news, launched an investigation into "colmado_naranja," which led through several online aliases and reported collaborators, including Dawnella Wilson, "Inspector Smith" and, eventually, to Lucas Smith.

Smith, whose background includes a criminal record and a reported attempt to sell his kidney to a man in need of organ transplant, nonetheless insists that his motives are above board, even if his past looks dubious.

"I do have a background. I've made mistakes in my life," Smith said in an email. "But it took a guy like me to go and get tangible proof about Obama. I don't mind breaking a few rules or policies here and there. I don't mind paying the military in foreign countries to look the other way ... The military [in Africa] will grant you access to just about anything for the right price. People are starving. So yes, it takes a guy like me to get things done sometimes."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Did you ever notice that Obama can read a speech (from a teleprompter) with a lot of well thought out words, and when he is finished you scratch your head and wonder --- just what did this guy say again? The truth is, he didn’t say anything. As he has said, and I quote “JUST WORDS”.

We really know nothing about the man, unless you dig deep. And then you find all kinds of conflicting information.

The document that Obama claims is his birth certificate doesn’t say anything that we don’t already know. All is really says is that he was born…alive. No hospital no doctor no witnesses no nothing. The only witness that we have heard from is Obama’s Grandmother and she says she was there at his birth --- in Mombassa Kenya.

Read other articles about Obama’s birth certificate
Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate

Watch the following videos and make up your own mind:
Kenyan birth certificate

Born in Kenya

Kenyan Roots

de Andréa

Friday, August 21, 2009

Our Communist President

Is President Obama A Communist? That depends on what one would accept as proof. Would being a member of the New American Communist Party be enough proof?

By de Andrae
If the fact, a socialist think tank partnered with the Marxists community activist group ACORN and with input from President Obama was instrumental in securing the appointment of the self acclaimed communist environmental Czar Van Jones isn’t enough proof that Obama is a communist. Then try this one on for size, a news publication of the communist organization “The New Party” a spin off of the American Communist Party USA, includes Obama among its members. Read on and see for yourself.

Months before Obama took office, Van Jones a self admitted communist, was recommended for the environmental pick in a report by business scholar Chuck Collins, an associate of philanthropist George Soros and a longtime leftist activist linked to many socialist causes.

Collins is director of the Tax Program for Shared Prosperity at Demos, a far-left Socialist think tank that has partnered with ACORN and its ally, Project Vote, on several projects. Demos personalities were among ACORN's top defenders when the organization was accused of rampant voter fraud in 2008.

According to Demos' own website, while Obama was a state senator in 1999, he served on the working group that founded Demos.

Collins penned a piece that listed his top picks for the Obama administration, including Jones, at the radical Institute for Policy Studies.
Through the socialist party, Obama may be more closely linked to Collins, who recommended Jones.

Researcher Trevor Loudon of the New Zeal blog dug up official newspapers of the socialist-oriented New Party that list Collins as among the party's founding builders in its fall 1994 edition. Collins is listed with approximately 100 other activists in an article entitled, "Who's Building the New Party?"

Obama undoubtedly belongs to an American Communist party known as “The New Party” Note the photos of the front page and the subsequent enlargements of the acknowledgment of Obama’s membership in the Communist party organization.

In a controversy never addressed by Obama, there is evidence showing Obama as a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a Social Communist agenda.

While running for the Illinois state Senate in 1996 as a Democrat, Obama actively sought and received the endorsement of the “New Party”, according to confirmed reports during last year's presidential campaign.
The New Party, formed by members of the Democratic Socialists of America and leaders of an offshoot of the Community Party USA, was an electoral alliance that worked alongside the ‘Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now’ ACORN.

The New Party's aim was to help elect politicians to office who espouse its Socialistic policies.

Among New Party members was linguist and radical activist Noam Chomsky.

Obama's campaign last year denied the then-presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party. Hey! Obama…”What’cha you gonna do when they come for you”?

The New Zeal blog dug up print copies of the New Party News, the party's official newspaper, which show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.

The party's spring 1996 newspaper boasted: "New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary). The paper quoted Obama saying "these victories prove that small 'd' democracy can work.” The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member. Note: Small ‘d’ democracy is code for Social Communism.

New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago's Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group's support and "encouraged NP’ers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration." Another code word for ‘Voter Fraud’

Becoming a New Party member requires some effort by a politician. Candidates must be approved by the party's political committee, and then once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a "visible and active relationship" with the party.

Established in 1992, ‘The New Party took advantage of what was known as “Electoral Fusion," which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party went defunct in 1998; one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

Following the initial reports of Obama's membership in the New Party, Obama associate and former Chicago New Party activist Carl Davidson posted a statement on several blogs claiming his former party was not socialist, but he admitted it worked with ACORN.

"[The New Party] was a pragmatic party of 'small d democracy' mainly promoting economic reforms like the living wage and testing the fusion tactic, common in many countries but only operational in New York in the U.S. The main trend within it was ACORN, an Alinskyist outfit, which is hardly Marxist," wrote Davidson.

But the socialist goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party's stated objectives was "full employment, a shorter work week, and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal 'social wage' to include such basic benefits as healthcare, child care, vacation time, and free education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth and like programs to ensure gender and race equity."

The New Party stated it also sought "the Nationalization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets, community-controlled alternative financial institutions." Something Obama has already accomplished.

Many of the New Party's founding members were Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA. Obama attended several DSA events and meetings, including a DSA-sponsored town hall meeting Feb. 25, 1996, entitled "Employment and Survival in Urban America." He sought and received an endorsement from the DSA.
According to DSA documents, the New Party worked with ACORN to promote its candidates.

ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, has been a point of controversy for Obama over the presidential candidate's ties to the group.
In 1995, the DSA's New Ground newsletter stated, "In Chicago, the New Party's biggest asset and biggest liability is ACORN.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Are you still not convinced that president Obama is a Socialist Communist? Then no amount of proof would satisfy you.

While being a Communist may not be a High Crime or even a Misdemeanor, which would be grounds for empeachment, I believe the an American president with obvious ties to Socialist Communist organizations and oppointing known communists to his Cabinet should be at least reported on by the ‘Alphabetsoup Media’.

Oh! I forgot, they're also Commies…

de Andréa

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Obama’s Communist Green Jobs Czar

Van Jones, another one of Obama’s close communist associates was appointed as Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar” in March of 2009

By de Andréa

As a matter of process all presidents almost immediately after their inauguration, surround themselves with people that subscribe to the same ideologies as their own. President Barrack Hussein Obammah is no exception.

Van Jones appointment as a White House environmental adviser was announced March 10, 2009.

Van Jones, Obama's new Environmental Adviser, is a co-founder of ‘ColorofChange’, among many other communist organizations.

Listen to what Michael Savage says about Van Jones and Obama’s Green Shirts.

The group's executive director is James Rucker, who previously served as director of the Grassroots Mobilization for the radical liberal Socialist Organization

Immediately following the release of this report, the ‘’ColorofChange” scrubbed its site of any mention of Jones. After the deletion was pointed out, ColorofChange added Jones back to its site but now claims, "Van hasn't been active in the work of ColorofChange in recent years. After helping ColorofChange get started in 2005, Van moved on to other pursuits." Previously, the site simply listed Jones as a co-founder but did not claim any distance from the radical activist.

Most major media reports on the ColorofChange campaign fail to note Jones is a founder of the group or that the Fox News show host Glen Beck has been reporting critically on Jones. Glen Beck's program, meanwhile, has been taking major hits from the ColorofChange campaign. The insurance company Geico and for example, have pulled their ads from the Fox News show, and Procter & Gamble, Progressive Insurance and SC Johnson have all claimed their ads were run in error and vowed to correct the mistake. Fox News said most of the companies would have their ads shifted to other Fox programs.

According to the White House blog, Jones' new duties include helping to craft job-generating climate policy and to ensure equal opportunity in the administration's energy proposals.

Jones, formerly a self-described "rowdy black nationalist," boasted in a 2005 interview with the left-leaning East Bay Express that his environmental activism was a means to fight for racial and class "justice."

Jones was also president and founder of ‘Green For All’, a nonprofit organization that advocates building a so-called inclusive green economy.

Until recently, Jones was a longtime member of the board of Apollo Alliance, a coalition of labor, business, environmental and community leaders that claims on its website to be "working to catalyze a clean energy revolution that will put millions of Americans to work in a new generation of high-quality, green-collar jobs."

He was a founder and leader of the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. The organization had its roots in a grouping of black militants organizing to protest the first Gulf War. STORM was formally founded in 1994, becoming one of the most influential and active radical groups in the San Francisco Bay area.

STORM worked with known communist leaders. It led the charge in black protests against various issues, including a local attempt to pass Proposition 21, a ballot initiative that sought to increase the penalties for violent crimes and require more juvenile offenders to be tried as adults.

The leftist blog Machete 48 identifies STORM's influences as "third-worldist Marxism (and an often vulgar Maoism)."

Speaking to the East Bay Express, Van Jones said he first became a radical Communist in the wake of the 1992 Rodney King riots in Watts California, during which time he was arrested. "I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th," he said. "By August, I was a communist. I met all these young radical people of color – I mean radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like… 'This is what I need to be a part of.' I spent the next 10 years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, learning to be a communist revolutionary," he said.

Trevor Loudon, a researcher and opponent of communism who runs the New Zeal blog, identified several Bay Area communists who worked with STORM, including Elizabeth Martinez, who helped advise Jones' Ella Baker Human Rights Center, another radical organization which Jones founded to advocate civil justice. Jones and Martinez also attended a "Challenging White Supremacy" workshop together.

According to the researcher Trevor Loudon, Martinez was a long time Maoist who went on to join the Communist Party USA breakaway organization Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, or CCDS, in the early 1990s. Martinez still serves on the CCDS council and is also a board member of the Movement for a Democratic Society, where she sits alongside Weathermen radicals Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

One of STORM's newsletters featured a tribute to Amilcar Cabral, the late Marxist revolutionary leader of Guinea-Bissau and the Cape Verde Islands. This tribute is noteworthy because Jones reportedly named his son after Cabral and reportedly concludes every e-mail with a quote from the communist leader.

STORM eventually fell apart amid bickering among its leaders. Van Jones then moved on to environmentalism. He used his Ella Baker Center to advocate "inclusive" environmentalism and launch a Green-Collar Jobs Campaign, which led to the nation's first Green Jobs Corps in Oakland, Calif.

At the Clinton Global Initiative in 2007, Jones announced the establishment of Green For All, yet another radical communist activist organization which in 2008 held a national green conference in which most attendees were black. Jones also released a book, "The Green Collar Economy," which debuted at No.12 on the New York Times' bestseller list – the first environmental book written by an African American to make the list.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It may be necessary to note the reason Van Jones and other Communist activists have steered a course toward the color green in recent years. Just in case it isn’t obvious enough, one might conclude that the course “Change” (note the emphases on “Change” a code word for revolution,) isn’t a change in direction away from the fundamental philosophy of ‘Communism’, but simply a new platform or conduit in which to promote the ideology of a utopian ‘Socialist Communist State’. As you may already know “Environmentalism” is definitely not about the environment, but instead all about achieving a base of power and control.

“Birds of a feather flock together.” William Turner 1545
Original Quote…"Byrdes of on kynde and color flok and flye allwayes together."

“The end justifies the means” Niccolo di Bernardo dei Machiavellili 1493, later adopted by Karl Heinrich Marx 1848. in the book "The Communist Manifasto".

Isn't it interesting that Machiavellili, Marx, Jones and Obama all believe in democracy as a means to an end. This my friend, is why America was not designed as a 'Democracy', but instead a "Constitutional Republic".

Think about it...

de Andréa

Monday, August 17, 2009

Who is Barack Hussein Obama Really, We have film.

Watch a series of videos that were produced by Sean Hannity, on what we know about Barack Hussein Obama the community organizer.

By de Andréa

Are Americans deceived? Yes, by one of the most elaborate deceptions in world history.

Here it is, produced by Sean Hannity six segments about Obama' background.
Should we be afraid of this president? We should be very afraid.
Is this our big brother Obama protecting us?

Here are the 6 segments exposing Obama for what he really is. Hopefully, they will not have been removed before you get to view them.

Part 1 -

Part 2 -

Part 3 -

Part 4 -

Part 5 -

Part 6 -

THE BOTTOM LINE: History may remember Barack Hussein Obama not only as the 44th president of the United States and the first black president, but he should also be known as the great deceiver. You have just seen how Obama was groomed and trained by the best of the best of the most despicable and perverted forms of human ideology the world has to offer.

Because this study concentrated mostly one his education and indoctrination of his early adult life, nothing was mentioned about when and where this perverted indoctrination actually began.

Community Terrorism or Organizing
Obama is a student of Sol Alinsky, the 60s communist and revolutionary who first formed an actual written strategy page on how to "mobilize" the bums in ghettos who were usually too drunk, drugged out, or stupid to get a job. Much easier to mobilize them for the purpose of getting something for nothing, especially from "whitey.” Operating under various feel good fronts like Participatory Democracy, democratic consulting to multi-organizational systems, ACORN, Industrial Areas Foundation recently involved in attempting to register 1million illegal aliens under another banner called Active Citizens Campaign. Alinsky formulated a tactic that basically instructs people to ask for the moon and settle for less. What is left out is that the "asking" part is almost always a threat of violence by large mobs. Anything connected with Alinsky gets automatic press praise because it's the left and the left is always on the side of good and what's right. Alinsky made sense for those aching to live a life challenging anything and anybody who might be productive while doing their best to stay on the economic fringes of society.

Sol Alinsky was actually a close friend of Obama’s Grandfather (his mother’s father) in Hawaii, and when Obama was in High School Obama lived with his Grand father while his mother returned to Indonesia. He and his Grandfather hung out with Sol Alinsky and the Hawaiian Communist party. Obama’s communist brainwashing began at age 15.

A truism:
“Train up a child in the way you would have him go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.”
Proverbs 22:6

de Andréa

The Next American Revolution

Will there be yet another “shot heard ‘round’ the world”? This time taxes without representation alone may not be the fuel for the fire that is beginning to erupt.

By de Andrea

America is restless. The third shot of the “Second American Revolution” has been fired. History is being made. But as with the first two shots, the third shot is being stifled. Americans are seething. Not since the Civil War has anything like this happened. But the protests are being intentionally downplayed and ignorantly misinterpreted.

Shot #1 of this revolution was fired on April 15, 2009. Over 700 anti-tax rallies and “Tea Parties” spontaneously erupted nationwide. Rather than acknowledge their significance, the general media either ignored or ridiculed both protests and protestors, calling them malcontents and extremists.

Initially President Obama said he was unaware of the tea parties. The White House later warned that they could “mutate” into something “unhealthy,” and the protestors were tagged with the new name of “Domestic Terrorists”.

Shot #2 was fired on the Fourth of July, when throngs of citizens across the nation gathered to again protest “taxation without representation.” And as before, the demonstrations were branded right-wing mischief and they were dismissed as “Mobsters”.

Shot #3 of the volley, fired in early August, was aimed point blank at Senators and House members pitching President Obama’s health care reform package to constituents. In fiery town hall meetings, enraged citizens shouted down their elected representatives. It took a strong police presence and/or burly bodyguards to preserve a safe physical space between the politicians and irate townspeople.

The White House and the media have labeled protestors “Conservative Fringe Elements,” “Domestic Terrorists” and “Mobsters” and as players in staged events organized by Republican operatives that have been egged on by Fox news and right-wing radio show hosts.

In regard to this latest wave of outbursts, the National Lawyers Guild and other health industry special interest groups opposed to government health care reform are also being blamed for inciting the public. But whether it be organized or spontaneous, it is not the issue. While most protestors exhibit little grasp of the complex 1000 page health care reform document (that nary a legislator has read), their emotion is clearly real and un-staged.

Rightly or wrongly, the legislation is regarded as yet another straw on the already overloaded camel’s back. A series of gigantic, unpopular government-imposed (but taxpayer-financed) bailouts, buyouts, rescue and stimulus packages have been stuffed down the gullet of Americans. With no adequate public platform or representation to voice their opposition, options for citizens have been limited to fruitless petitions, e-mails and phone calls to Congress … all fielded by anonymous staff underlings.

Now, with Congress in recess and elected representatives less than a stone’s throw away in their districts, the public is exploding. The devil is not as much in the details of the heath care reform, the devil is the government mandating health care. Regardless of how the plan is pitched or what is being promised, to the public the legislation is yet another instance of big government taking another piece out of their lives and making them pay for it; again telling them what they can and cannot do.

Though in its early stages, the “Second American Revolution” is underway. Yet, what I forecast will become the most profound political trend of the century – the trend that will change the world – is still invisible to those same experts, authorities, and pundits, who didn’t see the financial crisis coming until the bottom fell out of our economy.

Watch for conditions to continue to deteriorate. The global economy is terminally ill. The recession is in a brief remission, not the early stages of recovery. Cheap money, easy credit, and unrestrained borrowing brought on an economic crisis that cannot be cured by monetary and fiscal policies that promote more cheap money, easy credit, and unrestrained borrowing.

Nonetheless, Washington will continue to intervene, tax, spend, and exert control. Protests will escalate and riots may follow.

Shot #4 of the “Second American Revolution” what will it be: While there are many wild cards that could light the fuse, The Trends Research Institute forecasts “that if the threat of government-forced ‘Swine Flu’ vaccinations is realized, it will be the fourth shot. Tens of millions will fight for their right to remain free and unvaccinated.”

Before the momentum of the “Second American Revolution” becomes unstoppable, it could be derailed through some false flag event, designed to deceive the public, or a genuine event or crisis capable of rallying the entire nation behind the President. In a worst-case scenario, according to Trends Research Institute Director, Gerald Celente, “Given the pattern of governments to parlay egregious failures into mega-failures, the classic trend they follow, when all else fails, is to take their nation to war."

THE BOTTOM LINE: The power of the Internet and new technologies is inexorably fermenting the “Second American Revolution.” However widespread and emotionally charged --- had the tax rallies, tea parties and healthcare reform protests occurred in years past, they might have been covered by the local media, but probably would not have made national headline news and thus would have died and stillborn.

Now however, with the ubiquitous camera-equipped cell phones, universal access to YouTube, and millions of twitters and tweeters, the uprisings cannot be ignored, contained, managed, spun, or edited down. The revolutionary fervor may prove contagious.

Can anything stop it? A false flag attempt, a genuine crisis, or a declaration of war, may slow the momentum of the “Second American Revolution,” but there may be nothing to stop it.

Be Prepared…

de Andréa

Friday, August 14, 2009

Democracy or Dictatorship

The difference between a Democracy and a Dictatorship is…Well in a democracy the representatives represent the people, but in a dictatorship the representatives represent the dictator.
de Andrae
August 14, 2009

While you are pondering on that, read a letter sent to me by one of my subscribers that Glenn Beck read on his radio show. He received a letter from a woman in Arizona. She writes an open letter to our so-called representatives. She speaks for me. What about you???

She writes:
I'm a home grown American citizen, 53,
registered Democrat all my life. Before the last presidential election I
registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party
represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer
feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues
important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or
representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues
important to me. There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand
up and tell me that you are there and that you're willing to fight for our
Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now. You might ask yourself what
my views and issues are that I would horribly feel so disenfranchised by both
major political parties. What kind of nut job am I? Will you please tell
Well, these are briefly my views and issues for which I seek

One, illegal
immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our
borders. Close the underground tunnels. Stop the violence and the trafficking in
drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution.
P.S., I'm not a racist. This isn't to be confused with legal

Two, the TARP bill, I want it
repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you no, but you
did it anyway. I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze,

Three: Czars, I want the
circumvention of our checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No
more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president.
Stop trampling on our Constitution and honor

Four, cap and trade. The debate on global
warming is not over. There is more to say.

universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision.
Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night and then go on break.
Slow down!

Six, growing government control. I
want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my
life, not more. Shrink it down. Mind your own business. You have enough to take
care of with your real obligations. Why don't you start

Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and
its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them
investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them
every time on every real estate deal that closes. Stop the funding to ACORN
and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust
them with taking the census over with our taxpayer money. I don't trust them
with our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it
resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a
duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You
work for us, the people. Investigate.

redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I
have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me
jobs. That is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I
never got a job from a poor person. Why do you want me to hate my employers? Why
-- what do you have against shareholders making a

Nine, charitable
contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped
many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs
best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We
want to do it ourselves.

Ten, corporate
bailouts. Knock it off. Sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard
times ahead, we'll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong
survive. Quick and painful. Have you ever ripped off a Band-Aid? We will pull
together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the
chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed

Eleven, transparency and
accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let's have it.
Let's say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk.
Please try -- please stop manipulating and trying to appease me with clever
wording. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and
meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude
to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from

Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it
Take a breath. Listen to the people. Let's just slow down and get some
input from some non-politicians on the subject. Stop making everything an
emergency. Stop speed reading our bills into law. I am not an activist. I
am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent
person. I am a parent and a grandparent. I work. I'm busy. I'm busy. I am busy,
and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the
business s of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our
bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships,
pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be
responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the
same all while living in the home of the free and land of the

I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed
in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What
happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find
humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a
bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not.
It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in
the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if
you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I
would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that
you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill. We
said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There
is such urgency and recklessness in all of the recent

From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone
insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly
feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to
stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and
forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on
hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to
give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we
may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on you to bring our concerns to
Washington Our president often knows all the right buzzword is unsustainable.
Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost
to come up with that word? We don't want your overpriced words. Stop treating us
like we're morons.

We want all of you to stop focusing on your
reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job
your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for
long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be
represented. You think we're so busy with our lives that we will never come
for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work , pay
taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone and we
are now looking up at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic spirit so strong
and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far.
Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be
there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have
their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the
polls on voting day to usher you out of office. We have cancelled vacations. We
will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us
and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn't ask for this fight. But the
gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You
will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are
candidates among us when he will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you
have made of our constitution.

Democrat, Republican, independent,
libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. Political parties are meaningless
to us. Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution
and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who
abuse power and seek more.. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it
back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are
dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to
us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency
loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be
fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to
be loyal to us, not to them. Because we will get you fired and they will not
save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand
up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I
need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with
the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one
by one. We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you
represent? Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are

An American you call a Terrorists and a Mobster.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The bottom line…Well the whole thing is the bottom line.

What’cha gonna do when dey come fo you…

de Andréa

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Our Terrorist Teachers

Are terrorists teaching our kids?

By de Andréa

I have written many articles describing the infiltration of Islam in this country as well as all other ‘Western Cultures’. In every aspect of our society is the ever growing threat of an ideology so completely foreign to the West that we fail to even recognize it.

The nation of Islam growing to nearly 2 billion people world wide is religiously programmed to infiltrate every country, every society, every culture, not to assimilate into it, but to reestablish the global empire of Islam.

One of the many avenues or techniques Islam has used to reach their goal of world domination is the field of education and or surreptitious indoctrination.

To answer the question; are terrorists teaching our kids? The answer is yes. No one knows this better than a good friend, mentor, and colleague of mine, Cinnamon Stillwell.

Ms. Stillwell is a San Francisco journalist, and the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum and a contributor to Fount Page Magazine.

Below is an article written by Ms. Stillwell in its entirety, about a Canadian Professor recently arrested for terrorist activities. To support the fact that this is a routine occurrence all over the United States as well, she includes a list of similar cases right here in our American schools and Universities. To read the original article on Campus Watch Research go to --

Campus Watch Research
Terrorist in the Ivory Tower? [on Hassan Diab; incl. John Esposito, Zachary Lockman, Juan Cole, et al.]

by Cinnamon StillwellFrontPage MagazineAugust 13, 2009

Do the ranks of Middle East studies professors include terrorists? If the allegations against University of Ottawa professor Hassan Diab are proved true, the answer will be yes.

Diab, a Lebanese-born dual Canadian citizen and author of Beirut: Reviving Lebanon's Past, is a lecturer in sociology at the University of Ottawa and until recently taught a part-time summer introductory sociology course at Carleton University in Ottawa. His job ended last month following allegations by French authorities that Diab was the leader of a commando team that perpetrated the 1980 bombing of the Rue Copernic synagogue in Paris. The bombing, which was attributed to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - Special Operations (PFLP-SO), a splinter group of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), killed three Frenchmen and an Israeli woman and wounded 20.

At the request of French authorities, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police arrested Diab in November, 2008. He's since been granted bail on numerous conditions, including wearing an ankle bracelet and only leaving his house escorted by one of the five people who posted his $250,000 bail.

French authorities who seek to extradite Diab for trial in France accuse him of making and planting the bomb used in the attack. According to Canwest News Service:

Diab resembles police sketches of the synagogue bomber; his handwriting matches
that of the bomber; he has been identified by intelligence sources and former
friends as having been a member of the PFLP; and his Lebanese passport, which he
reported stolen, was used to get into France at about the time of the 1980

Diab maintains his innocence. As reported in a National Post editorial:

Evidence from the files of the old East German secret police, the Stasi, leaves
little doubt that someone then going by the name "Hassan Diab" was
responsible for the bombing. The French investigating authorities are
certain they have found the right man, and have witnesses who are prepared
to say so, as well as other evidence implicating the Ottawa prof. But Mr.
Diab, who has a common Lebanese name, insists that he is a wholly innocent
victim of mistaken identity.

Furthermore, Diab's friends and colleagues insist that he is a peaceful, non-violent man who has never shown anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist leanings.

Predictably, Carleton University's decision to terminate Diab has caused an uproar among his academic peers. The Canadian Association of University Teachers issued a statement condemning Diab's "unjust termination" "in the strongest possible terms." An August 1, 2009, Ottawa Citizen op-ed signed by 30 members of Carleton's Department of Sociology and Anthropology described Diab's firing melodramatically, labeling it "an attack on widely held democratic values, and on the need to achieve justice through the law and due process" and "a bleak chapter in the story of injustice and discrimination in the dark shadow of 9/11." The op-ed stretches credulity by blaming the allegedly repressive, post-9/11 political atmosphere in "George W. Bush's America" for the firing—of a Canadian.

But Carleton University only employed Diab to teach a single course for several weeks during the summer while the regular instructor was on leave. Diab taught a similar course at Carleton earlier and was reinstated even after his arrest in November, 2008. It wasn't until July, 2009, that Carleton terminated his contract, citing a desire to provide students with "a stable, productive academic environment that is conducive to learning." Carleton was under no obligation to continue employing Diab and, as the authors of the op-ed themselves admit, "reasonable restrictions are, and should be, placed on those accused of violent crimes." Given that Diab is charged with murder and attempted murder, Carleton's decision to end his employment would seem to be a "reasonable restriction." Moreover, it's difficult to imagine any other profession in which an employee would not face similar consequences under such circumstances.

The op-ed's authors deploy another common tactic of the academic left: blaming purportedly omnipotent Jewish organizations for Diab's firing. His termination happened to follow a B'nai Brith press release objecting to his employment at Carleton. His defenders cast this fact in a sinister light, accusing the university, without evidence, of "succumbing to political pressure."

They imply that B'nai Brith was out-of-line for expressing concern that Diab might be a threat to "the safety and security of the community," ignoring that the terrorist attack at hand targeted a synagogue. If such charges had involved an attack against another minority group, it's doubtful these academics would object to such concerns.

Diab has yet to stand trial, but the reaction of his academic peers has been revealing. It demonstrates a knee-jerk opposition to authority, an arrogant rejection of accountability, and a dangerous naiveté towards the dangers of Islamic terrorism. Rather than expressing shock and horror that one of their own may have been involved in a heinous crime, they immediately jumped to his defense. But what will they do if the allegations against Diab prove true?

A look at the past may prove instructive. This isn't the first time the Middle East studies establishment has rallied around a beleaguered professor accused—or even convicted—of terrorism charges. Nor is it the first time such academics have acted as cohorts or apologists for those with proven Islamist sympathies. Consider these past examples:

Three University of South Florida Middle East studies professors (Ramadan
Abdullah Shallah, Bashir Musa Mohammed Nafi, and Sameeh Hammoudeh) were charged with racketeering and conspiracy to murder in 2003. Afterwards, all three were praised by their fellow Middle East studies faculty members and described as "scholarly" and "highly respected."
Professor of Middle Eastern studies and history at New York University Zachary Lockman testified on behalf of Arabic translator Mohamed Yousry, who
was on trial for aiding and abetting Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind sheikh.
Lockman called Yousry's conviction in 2005 "ludicrous" and described him as "a
very sweet, mild-mannered guy."

Rahman's attorney, radical leftist Lynne Stewart, was convicted of similar charges for sneaking messages from the imprisoned sheikh to members of the terrorist group Gama'a al-Islamiyya. Stewart has since become a frequent speaker at conferences on "academic freedom," alongside various Middle East studies professors. California State University, Sacramento sociology professor Ayad Al-Qazzaz once featured Stewart as a guest on his cable television show. To hear Al-Qazzaz tell it, Stewart was "falsely accused of helping terrorists."
University of Michigan history professor Juan Cole has spoken at numerous fundraising events for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the case against the Hamas-founded Holy Land Foundation.
John Esposito, founding director of the Saudi-funded Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, is known for his vigorous defense of radical Islamists, including former University of South Florida computer science professor Sami Al-Arian, who was convicted in 2006 for supporting
Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Speaking at a CAIR fundraiser in 2007, Esposito described Al-Arian as "a very good friend of mine," along with expressing his "solidarity" with both CAIR and the Holy Land Foundation.

Viewing the Middle East studies establishment's support for Diab against this background reveals a disturbing pattern. The presumption of innocence is one thing. Blindly throwing one's support behind any colleague accused of terrorist ties is another.

Cinnamon Stillwell can be reached at

Thanks Cinnamon …

THE BOTTOM LINE: Recently I have taken on a project of sitting in on classes at our local college. I can do that because I have attained the credentials of longevity, I guess if one becomes old enough, one can get away with anything. In visiting Sociology, Political Science, Philosophy, and Middle Eastern Studies classes, I can truly say that our free American independent culture is being incrementally and surreptitiously attacked by our own educational system.

"The greatest threat to mankind and civilization is the spread of the totalitarian philosophy. Its best ally is not the devotion of its followers but the confusion of its enemies. To fight it, we must understand it.” -- Ayn Rand

de Andréa

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Our Communist House

If you have ever read Karl Marx you will be able to relate to this

By de Andréa

Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income.
In other words tax what you have already been taxed on, and then tax the money being made by investing it toward your retirement. Is this woman is a nut case? No! She’s a Marxist.

Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a “Windfall Tax” on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K, IRA’S and Mutual Funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed welfare recipients!

This woman is frightening.
She said...”We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country, (didn't Marx say something like that?) and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can earn and invest.” This is anti-American!

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:
“We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, (as if the poor belong to her) unemployed and minorities to equal that of the rest. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans".

(Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.) 'Work hard for your retirement; then give it to others who have not worked for it'.

If you are not aware that America is rapidly headed toward a ‘Communist State’ then you simply must be in a Coma…

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need.” Karl Marx

Oh, where is Senator Joe McCarthy when you need him…

de Andréa

Friday, August 07, 2009

The World Dictator

U.S. Dictator Barrack Hussein Obammah’s régime reaches not only across this once free world but extends to the Holy Land of Israel.

By de Andrae

According to the Jerusalem Post, the Obama dictatorship has set up a spy apparatus to closely monitor Jewish construction in Jerusalem and the strategic West Bank to the point of watching Israeli moves house-to-house in certain key neighborhoods.

In support of the Palestinian terrorists, Obama has dictated a complete halt to what he refers to as settlement activity, meaning Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem or the West Bank. Obama's order extends to natural growth, or accommodating the housing needs of existing local population centers.

The demand is an apparent abrogation of a deal Israel struck with the Bush administration to allow for natural growth of the country’s population.

For the past few months, Obama's Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, has protested to the highest levels of the Israeli government about evidence of violations of Obama’s orders against any Jewish housing expansion in those areas, informed Israeli officials reported.

The officials, who spoke on condition that their names are withheld in fear if reprisals from the ‘Obama Regime’, said that last March Mitchell oversaw the establishment of an enhanced apparatus based in the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem that closely monitors the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem neighborhoods, incorporating regular tours of the areas, at times on a daily basis.

Once an ally of the United States, Israel is defying the dictates of the ‘Obama Régime’.
Called the ‘Expansion Prevention Project’ "Mitchell's apparatus takes things to a whole new level. They are watching very closely," said an Israeli official.

Jewish leaders in the West Bank said the American spies from the consulate take no pains to hide their activities. But they deceptively come out and tour our communities. They try to interact with our leadership," David Ha'ivri, spokesmen for the Shomron Regional Council in the West Bank. "They drive around the towns, check up on what's going on, they try to mingle with us to get more information on what we're up to and what we're doing," he said.

Ha'ivri said the consular officials present themselves as advisers to the U.S. consul-general. "But we know they are really spies for the Obama administration," he said.

Jerusalem officials affirm the consular staff report to Mitchell, Obama's chief spy in. the ‘Expansion Prevention Project’

Yesterday, for the second time the past few weeks, Obama summoned Israel's ambassador to Washington to protest Israel asserting its municipal rights in eastern sections of Jerusalem which his beloved Palestinian terrorists claim as their future capital.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman on orders of Obammah, summoned Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to Washington, with a message that the ‘Obama Regime; views the eviction Sunday of two Palestinian families from homes in eastern Jerusalem as "provocative" and "unacceptable."

In this case, Israel last week enforced its own property law in Jerusalem by evicting Arabs from a Jewish housing complex that purportedly had been illegally occupied.

Oren reportedly responded today by explaining that the housing complex has been Jewish-owned since before Israel's founding in 1948. Oren explained a court ordered the families' eviction since they had been living there illegally.

Dictator Obammah’s puppet stooge, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this week also of course denounced the evictions, calling them "deeply regrettable" during a joint press conference in Washington with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh.

The real story:
Much of the U.S. and international media the past few days have been reporting on Israel's eviction of Arab families from a house in eastern Jerusalem. The housing complex is located in the Sheik Jarra neighborhood of eastern Jerusalem. The home was originally Jewish, but its Jewish occupants were chased out during countrywide anti-Jewish Arab riots in 1929. Arabs then squatted on the property, with one family, the Hejazi family, becoming the de facto occupants despite never having purchased the property.

Even though documentation shows the complex is owned by Jews and that Arabs have been squatting on it illegally for almost a century, Jewish groups say they still legally re-purchased the property from the Hejazi family.

Following pressure from the Palestinian Authority, however, the family later denied selling the complex back to the Jews despite documentation and other evidence showing the sale went through.

Obama’s new allies, the terrorist organization who calls themselves the Palestinian Authority, in April warned Palestinians against selling their homes or properties to Jews, saying those who violate the order would be accused of "high treason" – a charge that carries the death penalty.

Israel's court system twice ruled the property belongs to Jews.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office earlier this week released a statement objecting to Obama’s of the Israeli government for enforcing property law in Jerusalem.

"The eviction in Jerusalem was a result of a ruling by the Israeli Supreme Court that had to decide in a dispute between two parties over the legal control of a property," Netanyahu's spokesman, Mark Regev, said. "The Supreme Court ruled for one side and not the other. In spite of the lack of respect in the Obama administration for Israeli law and its sovereignty, in all democracies the rulings of the courts must be upheld, and it is incumbent on the executive branch to implement such decisions." Regev said. “The Israeli Supreme Court is renowned internationally for both its independence and its professionalism. There are countless examples of the Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Palestinians in land disputes."

Yesterday marked the second time the past three weeks Israel's ambassador has been convoked by Washington to forcefully protest Israeli conduct in eastern Jerusalem. Last month, Oren was summoned by the State Department to demand a Jewish construction project in eastern Jerusalem be immediately brought to a halt.

The construction project, financed by Miami Beach philanthropist Irving Moskowitz, is located just yards from Israel's national police headquarters and other government ministries. It is a few blocks from the country's prestigious Hebrew University, underscoring the centrality of the Jewish real estate being condemned by the U.S.

Netanyahu strongly rejected the State Department demand, telling a cabinet meeting Israel's sovereignty over Jerusalem was not a matter up for discussion. "Imagine what would happen if someone were to suggest Jews could not live in or purchase [property] in certain neighborhoods in London, New York, Paris, Rome, or the U.S." he said just after his ambassador was summoned.

"The international community would certainly raise protest. Likewise, we cannot accept such a ruling on eastern Jerusalem," Netanyahu told ministers.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The Israeli government is defying an order given by the American Muslim Communist Dictator. Good for you Netanyahu, someone needs to stand up to this Dictator. It is surly is not going to be our spineless so-called congressional representatives.
Bye bye freedom, hello 'World Tyranny'...
de Andréa

Wednesday, August 05, 2009

The House Health Care Bill

So… you want government dependant health insurance. Do you even know what that means? Most of your representatives don’t…

de Andrae

What is the difference between a dictatorship and a democracy? In a democracy your representatives represent you. In a dictatorship your representatives represent the dictator.

Now listen carefully to what I am going to ask you…Did any of your representatives even ask you if you wanted to be taken care of by the Federal Government? Or be dependant on the government for your health? I’ll just bet they didn’t. Then are they representing you? No? Then just who are they representing? If your answer was Obama you would be correct. And this, my friend, is the reason this government run health care fiasco will pass in some form or another.

While you were sitting around your pool sipping whatever you are sipping these days, you lost your freedom, rights, and liberty. Yes, just like that. Of course this didn’t happen overnight; it is part of a plan set into motion as far back as 1913, which led to the first economic collapse by 1932 and if it hadn’t been for that nasty war with the Nazis getting in the way we would have lost it all by 1941. But it didn’t end there. We were again set up by the social elite’s in the 90’s which has led to where we are today. . And trust me health care is just a very important but small part of the equation.

You can call me a conspiracy nut or you can call me late for dinner, I don’t care. I know my history and I can see the train that is about to hit us. One only needs to turn around and look at the facts and face the truth.

Here's an opportunity for you to see the House version of Obama's health plan to further establish your dependence on the government. Below, sent to me by one of my readers, is a synopsis of some of the more ominous provisions of the plan, some of which your representatives haven’t read. If you want to see the entire bill so that you can refer to the exact wording of something you see in the synopsis the link is at the end of the synopsis. The whole 1017 pages is there for you to marvel at.

I'm sure that the politicians think that most Americans are idiots and won't find out the details of their plan and therefore remain silent. Did you ever think that in six short months a new Administration and Congress, with the help of a lapdog Press (granted their freedom by the Constitution) could have us so far down the road to a socialistic dictatorship?

How is Obama's "Hope and Change" working out for you?

Just as an appetizer to stimulate your political tasty buds, page 425 of Health Care Bill – (If your want, listen to this interview on Fred Thompson's Radio Show interviewing Betsy McCaughey (pronounced Mc Coy). Look it up on

On page 425 it says in black and white that EVERYONE on Social Security (it will include all Senior Citizens and SSI people) will go to MANDATORY counseling every 5 years to learn and to choose from ways to end your suffering (and your life). Health care will be denied based on age. 500 billion will be cut from senior’s healthcare. The only way for that to happen is to drastically cut health care, the oldest and the sickest will be cut first. Moreover, as in Canada or Great Britain, paying for your own care will not be an option.

Now, CALL YOUR PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tell them to read the bill before they vote, especially page 425 if they don't read anything else. Surely some of them have parents.
Big brother is here...

Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Government will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure!!

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get.

Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill - YOUR HEALTHCARE IS RATIONED!!!

Pg 42 of HC Bill - The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC Benefits for you. You have no choice!

PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Pg 58HC Bill - Government will have real-time access to individual's finances and a National ID Healthcard will be issued!
Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Government will have direct access to your banks accounts for election funds transfer.
PG 65 Sec 164 is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in Unions and community organizations (ACORN).
Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Government is creating an HC Exchange to bring private HC plans under Government control.
PG 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Government mandates ALL benefit packages for private HC plans in the Exchange.
PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs for of Benefit Levels for Plans = The Government will ration your Healthcare!
PG 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill - Government mandates linguistic appropriate services. Example - Translation for illegal aliens.
Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Government will use groups i.e., ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government HC plan.
PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs of Benefit Levels for Plans. #AARP members - your Health care WILL be rationed.-
PG 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill - Medicaid Eligible Individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. No choice.
pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue GOVERNMENT on price fixing. No"judicial review" against Government monopoly.
pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill - Doctors/ #AMA - The Government will tell YOU what you can make.
Pg 145 Line 15-17 An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE.
Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.
Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY Employer with payroll 400k and above who does not provide public option pays 8% tax on all payroll.
pg 150 Lines 9-13 Businesses with payroll between 251k and 400k who don't provide public option pay 2-6% tax on all payroll.
Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to Government will be taxed 2.5% of income.
Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay)
Pg 195 HC Bill -officers and employees of HC Admin (GOVERNMENT) will have access to ALL Americans finance/personal records
PG 203 Line 14-15 HC - "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax" Yes, it says that.
Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Government will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected. [They will include "End of Life Counseling" instead.]
Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill - Doctors, doesn't matter what specialty you have, you'll all be paid the same.
PG 253 Line 10-18 Government sets value of Dr's time, proof, judgment etc. Literally the value of humans.
PG 265 Sec 1131 Government mandates and controls productivity for private HC industries.
PG 268 Sec 1141 Fed Government regulates rental and purchase of power driven wheelchairs.
PG 272 SEC. 1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!
Page 280 Sec 1151 The Government will penalize hospitals for what Government deems preventable readmissions.
Pg 298 Lines 9-11 Drs, treat a patient during initial admission that results in a readmission Government will penalize you.
Pg 317 L 13-20 OMG!! PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. Government tells Drs. what/how much they can own.
Pg 317-318 lines 21-25,1-3 PROHIBITION on expansion- Government is mandating hospitals cannot expand
pg 321 2-13 Hospitals have opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input required. Can you say ACORN?!!
Pg335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339 - Government mandates establishment of outcome based measures. HC the way they want. Rationing.
Pg 341 Lines 3-9 Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Adv Plans, HMOs, etc. Forcing people into Government plan
Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people!
Pg 379 Sec 1191 Government creates more bureaucracy - Telehealth Advisory Committee. Can you say HC by phone?
PG 425 Lines 4-12 Government mandates Advance Care Planning Consult. Think Senior Citizens end of life
Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Government will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney. Mandatory!
PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Government provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death.
PG 427 Lines 15-24 Government mandates program for orders for end of life.The Government has a say in how your life ends.
Pg 429 Lines 1-9 an "advance care planning consult" will be used frequently as patient’s health deteriorates.
PG 429 Lines 10-12 "advance care consultation" may include an ORDER for end of life plans. AN ORDER from GOVERNMENT.
Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The Government will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.
PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Government will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.
Pg 469 - Community Based Home Medical Services=Non profit organizations. Hello, ACORN Medical Services here!!?
Page 472 Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION. One monthlypayment to a community-based org. Like ACORN?
PG 489 Sec 1308 The Government will cover Marriage and Family therapy. Which means they will insert Government into your marriage.
Pg 494-498 Government will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, rationing those services
Here's the whole bill - I really hope people will read this and become aware of what your government has in store for you and your children. House Bill 3200 It will take awhile to down load, it has over a thousand pages.

The URL is---

Thanks for turning around and looking down the road…

de Andréa