Wednesday, April 25, 2007

A Glimpse into the” Marxists Mind” of The Queen Bee

The only way an American citizen can support Nancy Pelosi’s theories and can make any sense of what she spins, is if they too are socialists and hate America as well

The flag is of Communist China

By de Andréa

Take a good hard look at what the third in line for the Presidency stands for.

Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer. First Bush cut taxes for the rich” she says, “and the economy has rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers, are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class. Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class, who by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich.”

When further questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed, and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs. There is no question these windfall profits and income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class".

She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time highs. What this really means” she says, “is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets. We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income from flowing to the rich."

When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401K's, and the stock market she replied. "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down" economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous. How much of this 'trickle down' ever gets to the unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs."

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower Federal income tax payers off the roles and increase government income substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied. "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed, and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Nancy’s condemnation of the wealthy, the redistribution of money, her support of welfare recipients, the taxing at 100% rate to distribute to the poor, is straight out of Carl Marx. If this political philosophy is allowed to permeate and control our society and the foundation of this Constitutional Republic, it will destroy all freedom that may exist anywhere in the world. I say that because freedom exists on the earth, only because America exists.

The twisted philosophy of Ms. Pelosi is not only un-American but it even resembles the tyranny of the historical dynasties of China which eventually destroyed the economic fabric of China for everyone, eventually even the Dynasty Dictators.

I vote we bring back the oversight of the Department on Un-American Activities, I am sure that Nancy’s, days of freedom in America, as well as those of her socialist liberal friends, would be over.

de Andréa

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

More On Indoctrination And Islamic Infiltration

Our Public Institutions of Higher Learning are Giving Way to Islamic Religious Rituals, violating their own Religious “Entanglement” Rules

By de Andréa
April 23, 2007

Religious entanglement rules now pertain only to the Christian religion.

Colleges are actually teaching and promoting Islamic infiltration and indoctrination of Islam for the purpose of changing the culture of America to an Islamic State.

Cultural and religious clashes involving Islam have been making headlines for awhile now in Minnesota. At the airport, some Muslim taxi drivers refuse to transport passengers carrying alcohol; at Target stores, some Muslim cashiers won't scan pork products.

Now there's a new point of friction: Minneapolis Community and Technical College. Its officials say the college, a public institution, has a strict policy of not promoting religion or favoring one religion over another. "The Constitution prevents us from doing this in any form," says Dianna Cusick, director of legal affairs. But that seems to depend on your religion.

Where Christianity is concerned, the college goes to great lengths to avoid any hint of what the courts call "entanglement" or support of the church. Yet the college is planning to install facilities for Muslims to use in preparing for daily prayers, an apparent first at a public institution in Minnesota.

Separation of church and state is clearest at the college during the Christmas season. A memo from Cusick and President Phil Davis, dated Nov. 28, 2006, exhorted supervisors to banish any public display of holiday cheer: "As we head into the holiday season ... "all public offices and areas should refrain from displays that may represent to our students, employees or the public that the college is promoting any particular religion.” Departments considering sending out holiday cards, the memo added, should avoid cards "that appear to promote any particular religious holiday."

Last year, college authorities caught one rule-breaker red-handed. A coffee cart that sells drinks and snacks played holiday music "tied to Christmas," and "complaints and concerns" were raised, according to a faculty e-mail. College authorities quickly quashed the practice.

They appear to take a very different attitude toward Islam. Welcome and accommodation are the order of the day for the college's more than 500 Muslim students. The college has worked with local Muslim leaders to ensure that these students' prayer needs and concerns are adequately addressed, Davis said.

Muslim prayer is an increasingly controversial issue. Many Muslim students use restroom sinks to wash their feet before prayer. Other students have complained, and one Muslim student fell and injured herself while lifting her foot out of a sink.

So the college is making plans to use taxpayer funds to install facilities for ritual foot-washing. Staff members are researching options, and a school official will visit a community college in Illinois to view such facilities while attending a conference nearby. College facilities staff members are expected to present a proposal this spring.

But where the Muslim prayer facilities are concerned, college authorities themselves are consulting with religious leaders, researching other schools, and using taxpayer money to make improvements to facilitate the Muslim student’s prayer needs

Issues surrounding the intersection of church and state and religious accommodation are complex. But the college's treatment of Christianity and Islam obviously reflects a double standard.

It's hard to imagine the college researching and paying for special modifications to the college to facilitate Christian rituals. And the "safety" justification… imagine if a particularly strict group of Christian students found it necessary to sometimes baptize others in the restroom sinks. Would the school build a baptism basin because a student hit his head on a sink? Certanly not…

Cultural infiltration Jihad in America
Ritual-washing area for Muslims at MCTC is just a small part of the ongoing infiltration of America, making us change our culture in order to accommodate theirs.
President Phil Davis -- MCTC is apparently the first public institution in Minnesota to enter this unfamiliar territory. Where is it looking for guidance?

Dianna Cusick, MCTC's director of legal affairs, is overseeing the project. She said the Muslim Accommodations Task Force, is a primary resource. "They've done all the research," she said. I found information about the handful of public colleges that have "wudu," or ritual bathing, facilities. But I also discovered something more important for colleges seeking guidance on "accommodations": Projects like MCTC's are likely to be the first step in a long process.

The task force's eventual objectives on American campuses include the following, according to the website: permanent Muslim prayer spaces, ritual washing facilities, separate food and housing for Muslim students, separate hours at athletic facilities for Muslim women, paid imams or religious counselors, and campus observance of Muslim holidays.

The task force is already hailing "pioneering" successes. At Syracuse University in New York, for example, "Eid al Fitr is now an official university holiday to take the place of Christmas," says an article featured on the website. "The entire university campus shuts down to mark the end of Ramadan.” At Henry Ford Community College in Dearborn, Mich., "halal" food -- ritually slaughtered and permissible under Islamic law -- is marked by green stickers in the cafeteria and "staff are well-trained in handling practices."

The task force professional staff, based in Washington, D.C., includes coordinators who provide legal advice, teach students to lobby, write letters on their behalf, and help them overcome "obstacles" such as college administrators' concerns about violating the separation of church and state.

The Muslim Accommodations Task Force is a project of the Muslim Student Association of the U.S. and Canada. MSA's mission is to enable Muslims here "to practice Islam as a complete way of life," and its "main goal" is "spreading the Islamic agenda," The association calls itself a"landmark Muslim organization in North America," and says it has chapters on 600 campuses.

On MSA's website (, the sort of inclusive language used by the Muslim Accommodations Task Force gives way to hard-hitting advice for insiders. One publication --"Your Chapter's Guide to Campus Activism" -- describes how activists can advance political positions such as "restoring justice within the Palestinian territories," and opposition to the Patriot Act and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The cover features a student with a megaphone, and the slogan "Speak Out! Stand Up! Say It Loud!"

MSA views itself as America's moral and political vanguard. "As Muslims, we are a nation elected by Allah God to lead humanity," the guide announces. On campus, that means initiating "mass mobilization" through "direct action campaigns"

The guide explains how Muslim student groups can obtain funding, identify coalition partners and "bodies of power" on campus, work within student government, and use the media. "Marches, rallies and protests on campus" can "generate massive amounts of exposure for your MSA and its cause to make a better America.”

In all these endeavors, however, establishing credibility is vital to success, the guide emphasizes. Activists must "take full advantage of the open-minded environment" on campus, and skillfully employ the language of patriotism and rights. Thus, activists should take care to position themselves as mainstream Americans. "Make use of terminology like 'our country,' 'our security,' and 'we, the American people,' " the guide suggests. “ Unless you identify with the people, you will never gain the legitimacy to criticize state policies," though "identifying yourself as an American" will not necessarily preclude criticism. Anybody see infiltration here???

Activists should also frame their objectives in language that Americans embrace. "Most Americans identify with concepts such as 'justice,' 'self-determination,' 'human rights' and 'democracy,' “the guide explains. “ These terms will be constructive when delivering your message, regardless of the issue."

For example, if you want to bring a speaker to campus to discuss the importance of hijab (Muslim women's headwear or covering), you will be "more effective" if you broaden the topic to "women's rights.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: These Muslim organizations and others such as CAIR the Counsel of American and Islamic Relations are under constant investigation by the FBI. Some officials from these and other Islamic organizations have been arrested and convicted of supporting Islamic Terrorists. These are Enemy’s of the United States, and yet our colleges, the Institutes of Higher Indoctrination and Brainwashing, are following the advice of these anti-American organizations that are infiltrating every facet of American culture, society, and government, for the purpose of undermining and ultimately destroying the very foundation of this countries freedom and liberty. Moreover they intend to bring America under the oppression of Islamic Sharia Law, incrementally and surreptitiously. It starts with our children, indoctrinating them to use and abuse our own system to bring about the Islamic agenda of oppressive conquest…

If you agree call Minneapolis Community and Technical College Director Dianna Cusick at (612) 659-6319 and President Phil Davis at (612) 659-6300 and let them know what you think of their endorsement of Islam, and their promotion of Islamic practices, as well as the indoctrination of Changing the American Culture to an Islamic State, moreover, their prohibitions against the Judao Christian traditions that this country was founded on.

de Andréa

Monday, April 23, 2007


Although it may not be immediately apparent, Islamic Jihad is taking place right now, right here in America.

By de Andréa

Flag of Saudi Arabia

The words on the flag of the evil Empire reads “there is no other god but Allah and Muhammad his prophet. [Notice the sword]

If one has been paying any kind of attention at all, to what has been going on in Europe in the past decade, then without even knowing it, one has been looking into the future of America. This window into the crystal ball of Europe should be a wake up call to America.

Less than a decade ago began the very same erosion of the European cultures and societies that is happing now, today, right here in America, all in order to accommodate the Ideologies of Islam. It was sold in Europe as the right thing to do, so as not to offend their Muslim friends. It is being sold in America as the respect for other cultures, by the movement of Multi-Culturalism which is one of the many subsidiary’s of the Political Correctness movement.

There are large cities and in many cases entire regions of European countries that are completely under Islamic control. For all definitive purposes mainland Europe is very close to being defined as a Muslim Nation with The United Kingdom not far behind.

With some exceptions, this Jihad war is being fought without so much as firing a shot. An isolated terrorist murder, a bombing here and there, a riot or two, but the most progress toward winning the Islamic Jihad war against the West has been with the weapon of stealthy Infiltration and the politically correct acceptance of the Middle Eastern Culture. This new kind of warfare is unknown to the west and until Islam discovered the weaknesses in the Western culture it was unknown to them as well.

The discovery of the weapon of Infiltration by the Islamic terrorist’s cells was a windfall given to them by the extremist liberal left in both Europe and America. It just so happens that the Nation of Islam and the Liberals of the West share something in common, Blind Extremism… What’s more, they both hate America.

The new US Christmas Stamp

There are many reasons why the liberals and Muslims both hate America, but at its foundation is that America represents individual freedom, this as opposed to the controlled Collectivism that both Islam and Liberalism promote. In the case of Islam it is the collective submission to their god Allah and all the rituals and laws of Muhammad (Sharia Law) as dictated by the Quran. And likewise for the Liberal, it is the collective submission to the dictates of the all knowing Elites and the tempting philosophy of socialism with the redistribution of wealth as dictated in the books of Karl Marx

The goal or the agenda of the far left liberal extremists and the Nation of Islam are closely related, both have tunnel vision and a burning drive to control their environment even to the extent of controlling the earth if necessary in order to establish their ideologies as the Utopian Religion of the world. Thus they at least temporarily enable each other.

Because of both of their inherent blindness, they unknowingly ride on each others backs. Each taking advantage of the others agenda, until one day, one will challenge the other and that is when Islam will prevail because when push comes to shove, Liberals have at least one fatal flaw, their passive approach to survival does not allow them to stand up and fight for their beliefs. They will then join Islam in an attempt to continue their agenda from within the Islamic Theocracy.

This all begins with the underhanded hypocrisy of tolerance, this is to make the necessary concessions in order to gain the support of the other, which is at the very foundation of Multi Culturalism, and through this support comes the eventual state of dependence. It is at this point the Social Liberal Elitist, and or, the Islamic Jihadist will have taken a very large leap and reached a very important plateau in the relentless struggle toward their agenda of ultimate power and control of a society.

This new Jihad of surreptitious incremental infiltration by Islam, has been seriously inching its way toward the handle of power in Europe for nearly a decade, in the U.S. it has been approximately five maybe six years. It is a slippery slope which gains momentum as time goes by. To look into the future of America in five years, one only needs to look through the cracks in the window of Europe today.

The flag is of Iran
They have vowed to bury us in Nuclear waste

This blind liberal passivism of the left toward Islam is playing right into the hands of the most dangerous enemy the West has ever known. This type of warfare doesn’t require a military, only the incremental, but consistent and inocent looking invasion by a people eventually bent on the conquest of the world.

Having this kind of foresight requires that one can intellectually see down the road, at least beyond the end of ones nose.

With the absence of foresight, one still only needs to look in ones own back yard, there are already several cities in the U.S. that one would be hard pressed to distinguish from any city in the Middle East. Some have Islamic City Councils and Mayer’s and have replaced local laws with Sharia law. Christian Churches are not allowed to ring their bells on Sunday mornings; instead one hears the call to prayer five times a day on loud speakers. The Quran, Sharia law, and the philosophy of Islam is being taught in our public schools, while a Christian is not allowed to carry a Bible or pray on the school campus or even wear a cross around their necks.

Our Airport Security and the US Customs Agents are trained by Muslims supplied by CAIR a known Terrorist organization. Islam has, in approximately six years, infiltrated to some degree, nearly every part of the American Federal Government, and many of our State and local governments. It is now just a matter of time for the Snake of Islam to wrap its coils around this nation and squeeze the life out of us, all while we are asleep.

Hindsight on the other hand is only a good teacher if one can recognize ones mistake and regard it as a valuable tool. In the Nineteen Thirties the Roosevelt Administration neglected to become familiar with a book written by Adolph Hitler titled Mien Kampf, which clearly laid out Hitler’s plans for conquering the world.
Because Roosevelt didn’t read the words of Hitler whom he considered to be a lunatic, lunatic or not, the U.S. was caught with its preverbal pants down and was ill prepared to fight a war with anyone, especially a military power like what Germany had become. The only thing that saved us from the consequences of this gross mistake was the speed at which America could produce what it did not have.

After the Japanese invasion of Peril Harbor in December of 1941, Admiral Yamamoto of the Japanese Navy said “I am afraid we have awakened a sleeping Giant”. Today we not only have the valuable Hindsight of the 1930’s but we have the ability to learn in a few hours what it took the Christian Crusaders 300 years to learn before pushing Islam out of Europe and back into the sands of the Middle East, and yet we lie asleep as a people, as a country, as a Judao Christian Nation, just as ignorant as Roosevelt was about the agenda of the Nazis.

The words on the flag say: The Islamic resistance, Allah shall be triumphant…
Note the Global graphic and the name Allah spelled (AulLia) and reaching for the AK 47

Today we have the Hand book of the Nation of Islam, published in over 15 languages, clearly stating precisely what the agenda of Islam has been since before the year 632 AD which is to conquer the world and bring it under the Sharia Law and under the control of Allah the god of Islam, no matter what, or how long it may take. Moreover, unlike the Nazis, as long as there is one Muslim standing, Islam will never stop.

THE BOTTOM LINE: While we lie ignorantly and blissfully asleep sipping our liberal Kool-Aid, the Nation of Islam is busy infiltrating and incrementally taking control of America just as it has in Europe. If we as a nation and as a people are too busy to bother looking for the truth and continue in our lazy and complacent way of life, this time this sleeping Giant may just wake up to find it has lost the foundation of its freedom, and our liberty is crumbling, and we have new government, a new philosophy, a new religion, and a new god …Note: The American flag… no words, no weapons, just freedom…May God help us

de Andréa

Friday, April 20, 2007


In The Aftermath Of The Virginia Polytechnical Massacre, This Nation Must Look toward the next inevitable encore of this tragic event.

In case one is naive enough to think that we can wish this problem to vanish, I am sorry to be the bearer of the bad news of reality, but this will not only happen again, but it will increase in frequency and severity, because a “GUN FREE ZONE” is a safe place for gun wielding psychopaths.

By de Andréa


If there was no other reason for the framers to pen the Second Amendment than to protect our children especially while they attend school, it would be reason enough.
The alarming new details about Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho underscores the importance of a citizen’s individual right to keep and bear arms.

There were abundant warning signs that Cho posed a serious threat to the campus community, yet here he was running loose and committing mayhem. And all that seems to be on the minds of many in the media and at the offices of gun control extremists is figuring out how to exploit this horrible tragedy to erode and eventually destroy the very tool that we should be using to defend ourselves, our children, and our families.
If this case demonstrates anything, it is the ineptitude of a system that is as insane as the psychopathic mayhem it pretends to forestall. One of the symptoms of insanity is the repetitive action of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. My friend, if it doesn’t work lets try something that does.

Cho was taken to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation in December 2005 by the police, and a Montgomery County district court ruled him a danger to himself and to others. Instead of incarceration Cho for his own safety and the safety of those around him, a state doctor found his ‘insight and judgment’ to be ‘normal,’ and he was only given outpatient treatment. The system failed and this is what enabled Cho to buy a gun and commit genocide. How many other people like Cho are out there? Nobody knows, and it is because of this clear and present danger that Americans should not be browbeaten or bullied into surrendering their inalienable right to have a firearm for personal protection. In the past few days, I’ve lost count of the number of times people have asked me why Americans should have a right to buy a gun. The answer is simple. It’s because there are monsters like Cho Seung-Hui among us who are willing to kill without provocation or remorse. Police cannot always be there when they are needed, and people like Cho do not commit carnage by appointment. In 2006 attempts by the Virginia state legislature to allow legally-licensed citizens to carry on campus were stymied, with the help of a Virginia Tech spokesman. Nobody can say for sure whether an armed student or teacher could have intervened in time to save all the lives, but the probability exists and we do know what happens when they have been denied the means. This kind of thing should never happen, but it does when people are denied the means to fight back. If we learn anything from this tragedy, it is the value of the Second Amendment and self-defense, for those who value their lives and the lives of others.

The Dirty Little Secret of ‘Gun-Free School Zones
By last October, there were three fatal attacks on school property in less than a week; more than 20 since February 1996 when a 14-year-old youth strolled into a junior high school in Moses Lake, Wash. and opened fire, killing two students and a teacher.

The dirty little secret of all these atrocities is that they all have something in common, they all happened in a so-called “Gun Free School Zone.” Prior to the enactment of that horribly misguided federal legislation and its state-level clones, one did not read about school massacres, because prior to Gun Free School Zones there haven’t been any since 1927 where a teacher bombed his school and killed 52. The Gun Free School Zones Act transformed the public school landscape into a free-fire zone for whackos by removing any possibility, however small, that an armed teacher, student, or private citizen might be present to intervene. As a result, monsters like Colorado’s Duane Morrison or Pennsylvania’s Charles Roberts, and a host of others have been enabled to committed mayhem, with the aid of gun control fanatics who pressured Congress and state legislatures to pass such ignorant statutes.

The exception is Luke Woodham, who shot up Mississippi’s Pearl High School in 1997 after slitting his mother’s throat. Midway through his shooting spree, Woodham encountered Vice Principal Joel Myrick, who had rushed to his car to retrieve a .45-caliber pistol. Myrick aimed the gun at Woodham’s head and held him until police arrived. You read little about Myrick’s heroism, and less about his handgun, in press reports.

After the Pennsylvania attack on an Amish school in Lancaster County, anti-gun Gov. Ed Rendell had a remarkable moment of candor when he admitted that tougher gun laws would not have stopped the gunman. “You can make all the changes you want,” Rendell said, “but you can never stop a random act of violence by someone intent on taking his own life.” His remarks were largely ignored because nobody wants to admit that Rendell is right about this, the same as they ignored Myrick and his gun. Such facts don’t fit the anti-gun agenda.

It is time to re-consider gun-free school zone laws and the zero-tolerance mentality such laws foster. Inflexible regulations aimed at keeping kids safe has actually had the opposite effect and has placed students and teachers lives in jeopardy. A teacher in Lacey, Wash. was recently suspended for having a gun in her purse. Licensed to carry, she was afraid of her estranged husband, against whom she has a domestic violence protection order, and has filed for divorce, however now she’s in trouble; victimized by her spouse and again by the law.

We can no longer afford the empty-headed Utopian illusion that such statutes keep anyone safe, because they don’t. Like all other restrictive gun control measures, this one has been a monumental failure, it is literally making our schools the most dangerous place to be, and more importantly it is literally killing our children.

I am suggesting that teachers be allowed to arm themselves, and to scrap the law that prevents that option. School massacres didn’t happen in the days when high schools had rifle teams, and when it was common to find both teachers and students with rifles or shotguns locked in their cars. That was before “gun” became a four-letter word among self-described “progressive liberals” who championed the gun-free zones that enabled these insane attacks.

If what is happening at schools today is “progress,” we might be better off – and a lot of students would still be alive – if we were back in those unenlightened days when school kids riding down country roads with .22 rifles across their bicycle handlebars alarmed no one.

In the wake of our most recent school shootings, reaction from the brain-dead gun control crowd has been pathetic. Brady Campaign President Paul Helmke blustered that “we need to do something about this.” He suggested a national dialogue, as if more talk will stop suicidal maniacs.

His bunch has done enough damage already, with the help of gun-grabbing Congressional demagogues like Charles Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi and their far left colleagues, and an all-too-cooperative “mainstream” press. They gave us a law that leaves our children and their teachers vulnerable to the whims of any nut-ball looking for 15 minutes of fame because of real or imagined problems or perversions.

Restrictive gun laws do not prevent crime they only enable it, and the notion of a gun-free school zone is obviously a myth. More restrictions on law-abiding citizens will never stop people like Cho, Morrison or Roberts who proved yet again that feel-good laws have defrauded and deprived American citizens, and especially our children, of genuine safety.

When are we actually going to get serious about protecting our children while in school? We seem to be very serious about unprotected sex in our schools by teaching our children to arm themselves with a condom, moreover, we teach them how to use it. But we don’t protect them from a would-be murderer with a gun. Don’t our children deserve to be safe, especially while attending a government school?

After the Columbine shootings the US Congress went into special session and passed three more Federal gun laws to prevent this from ever happing again, even though the Columbine murderers violated 17 already existing Local, State and Federal gun laws before they even entered the school building. As a matter of fact at least eight more school shootings followed almost immediately after the new gun laws that were to prevent this from ever happening again were signed into law by the President. They were still blowing on the ink.

Of course one should get the picture that at least gun laws alone, do not protect anyone from anything. Additionally we should arm the teachers with condoms, well; maybe not condoms but at least a law book. The next criminal that comes into a school with a gun and points it at one of our children, the teachers could be armed with a law book and shake it in the face of the perpetrator and say in a polite and soft but firm voice “this is against the law”, possibly even pointing out the specific law that he or she is violating, this should provide our children with at least some protection. If that doesn’t work the teacher could suggest a group hug and chant something from the Quran.

In light of the most resent shooting at Virginia Tech, and following shortly on the heels, the copy cat threats in Yuba City California , the proof that our legislators do not agree with arming our teachers with law books or something, is that they want to pass some more anti gun laws so this will never happen again. Somehow this all sounds vaguely familiar to me, oh yes they did that after the Columbine school shootings and the Amish Massacre in Pennsylvania maybe three more laws wasn’t enough. Maybe shaking a law book in the face of a would-be murderer while facing east toward Mecca all while hugging a weed will be effective; maybe not.

In the “Gun Free Zone” of Columbine High School in Jefferson County Colorado, an armed school security officer and SWAT teams stood ineptly and disgracefully by, while our school children were being systematically murdered just a few feet away inside the school library. This happened in 1999 and since then, these types of school executions have been repeated unabated too many times, what’s more, little or nothing has been done to stop these outrages attacks on our children from happening, again and again.

Following the Columbine shooting, President Bush Addressed a group of citizens, parents and State and county officials including Sheriff Dawsy and Attorney General Gonzales at the National 4H Conference center in Chevy Chase Maryland; the purpose was to discuss solutions about the lack of school security in our public school system in the aftermath of more school shootings. After all the speeches and Q and A, the real problem was not even addressed, much less any solutions suggested. A lot of rhetoric about the psychology of students wanting to commit suicide, and opening the doors of communication etcetera, all good prophylactic subjects, but none of this will prevent someone from coming into a school with a gun and blowing away our kids such as the subsequent Amish Massacre in Pennsylvania and now even though it was known that Mr. Cho at Virginia Tech was mentally disturbed enough for a judge to determine that he was a danger to himself and to others back in 2005 all this so-called prophylactic psycho analyses is obviously as useless as a turn signal on a field plow.

Not only have our schools been legislated as gun free zones by our so- called Federal Government-Protectors, but they have also been determined, not by representation of and by and for the people, but by a dictatorial process, known as “Legislation without Representation”, and in violation of Constitutional Law, to be “God Free Zones” as well.
While they are obviously not gun free, they are however, for the most part legally or illegally legislated to be God free. One cannot help but wonder however, in both cases, if this has something to do with the real problem of protecting our school children. Franklin Graham made the statement the he believed these school attacks are an attack by Satan on our children; I am inclined to believe he is right. Where God is absent Satan rules…

Possibly we would do better at protecting our children from these killers than trusting in our Federal Protectors, by carrying a Bible in one hand and a gun in the other. If these cowardly murdering sons of Satan won’t pay any attention to God’s word in one hand then shoot them with the gun in the other before they kill our children.

We can pass more anti-gun laws, we can attempt to raise the self-esteem of our children, we can self police our media not to sensationalize these outrages crimes, we can psychoanalyze our society to try to understand why warm fuzzy people go bad, and on and on. But in doing so, we will not stop these murderers from massacring our children. While some of these studies could be honorable endeavors, none address the problem, or offer any solution to the problem of protecting our children from these psychopathic killers and predators.

Interestingly enough a solution has been found and is already in place, Israel, for example, has for many years, armed not only its security guards and principles, but also teachers in the classrooms. Thailand is another country which has successfully armed their school personnel. Everywhere that this type of protection has been tried, it has been successful, yes even in the U.S. In 1995 the State of Utah, armed not only teachers, principles and security guards with concealed weapons, (pistols) but even parents, picking up their children from school are also armed. They have not kept this a secret in their State and as a result for the eleven years that Utah has had this program, they have not experienced any murders or any kind of gun related problems in their schools.

Even without a program of this type in place, as mentioned before, a random defence by Principal Joel Myrick in a Mississippi school in 1997 thwarted an attack after several people were already shot at pearl high school. Principal Myrick retrieved his semi automatic 45 from the trunk of his car nearly a quarter mile from his school, and managed to stop the perpetrator on his way to Pearl Junior High before the maniac could continue his rampage. Within a few days of the Pearl school shooting, an armed citizen stopped another attack in an Edinboro, Pennsylvania school. There are many such successful cases reported in schools throughout the U.S. One cannot help but think, what if Principal Myrick had been able to carry his gun instead of having to retrieve it from his car, or better yet, if at least some of the teachers were armed, there may be a few more innocent people alive today, in that one incident alone.

This type of program will of course be met with enormous opposition by the few hug a weed pacifists in our society, that would rather all sit around wondering why we just can’t all learn to get along with our warm fuzzy psychopathic murderers, and just try to understand why they might want to kill our children or whether their parents were mean to them, or maybe we as a community have done something to provoke this behavior. This is of course, sort of what we have been doing for years and I think we can honestly say—it is not working very well. Maybe it is time to try something that has already been proven to work even in our own country, as well as others.

Some may say, well how about just arming school principals and security guards? Unless we can have a principal or a security guard in every classroom, it would be useless, let’s not forget that Columbine had an armed security guard who cowered along with the disorganized S.W.A.T. team worrying more about, the political ramifications of shooting children that were shooting other children, than storming the place and putting a stop to these murders. No, every teacher, in every classroom, must be trained and armed. [The investigation of the Columbine fiasco by the way, is still on going]

THE BOTTOM LINE: Schools are magnets for psychopathic killers because it is a pretty safe bet that there will be not be any significant resistance in a “Gun Free Zone” against anyone bent on killing helpless children. Once a program of armed school personnel is in place, as in the State of Utah, a perpetrator would likely be intimidated enough not to carry out his intent of murder and mayhem in a school classroom. If our Federal Government had only one job, it would be, according to our Constitution, to protect the citizens of this country from a foreign invasion. Interestingly the Constitution does not stipulate where, or what kind of foreign invasion, or by whom. Whether it is at the boarder by a foreign nation, or at the threshold of our schools by a psychopathic killer, our Federal and State Governments have a responsibility to protect, and prevent our young citizens from having to live everyday in fear of death or great bodily harm just to get an education.

If I were a Parent of a young child entering a government school or any school for that matter, for the first time today, the first question I would ask is… What kind of protection program does this school have in place for my child’s safety, if let’s say, a would-be kidnaper or murderer would enter this school and point a gun at my child’s head? I doubt at present, any school in my State could even come close to offering a satisfactory answer to that question. Then I would have to say… I am sorry then, I cannot place my child in this school. If even a minority of parents would do that, I can guarantee something would be done. What do you think??? I would like to hear from some teachers as well as parents.

On a personal note: I even carry my gun to church and no body knows, so not even the pacifists anti gun people are bothered. They don’t even know that they are being protected by a Bible in one hand, and a gun in the other…

de Andréa

Thursday, April 19, 2007


The Korean Student That Killed 32 of His Fellow Students in Worst School Shooting in U.S. History
By de Andrea
Cho Seung-Hui

Carl Jung coined the notion of the Collective Unconscious. The theory is that when shielded by the anonymity of a crowd, people will abandon their personal values to surrender to the contagious emotions of the crowd. A crowd thus assumes a life of its own, stirring up emotions and driving people toward irrational action. Freud called it Crowd Psychology.

Liberalism depends on the Collective Unconsciousness to move ahead an agenda of Pacifism. This collective brainwashing was tragically evident in Norris Hall when the students lay in the floor and watched in terror while Cho repeatedly took his time changing empty magazines in his Glock and then resuming his bloody shooting spree.

Certainly there was enough time to shoot the gun wielding maniac if anyone would have had a gun for self defence, unfortunately guns are ironically not allowed on the collage Campus, Virginia Tech is a “Gun Free Zone”. But likely even enough time to rush the killer if our young heads full of mush had not been so brainwashed in this new liberal pacifist academic society to submit to violence so as not to anger the attacker, as opposed to fighting back, we are indoctrinated with this pacifist liberal philosophy that this is the safest possession to take.
Part of the safety procedures in the Virginia Tech's faculty manual, support this dangerous passive position, even to the point of-"if the perpetrator gives up, and offers you his gun, you are not to touch it". It is this brainwashing indoctrinated and programed Passivity that sets the stage for the enabling of these psychopathic maniacs. Instead of being a deterrent, this acts as a vacuum, in actually promoting this kind of behavior.
As a result Cho Seung-Hui, unchallenged, killed 32 people and himself on Monday morning the 16th of April 2007, at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

Mr. Cho seems to have been a shy, quiet type seething with rage toward his imagined unspecified tormentors.

Virginia Tech police on Tuesday morning identified Cho, 23, as the man whose body had been found in Norris Hall, the site of the worst shooting spree in American history, lying dead, next to two semi-automatic pistols.

According to the Chicago Tribune, scrawled on the inside of one arm, were the words "ISMAIL AX" which is a reference to the Islamic account of the Biblical sacrifice of Ishmael as the son of Abraham.

From his actions, words and writings it is quite clear that he was at least influenced by Islam and the agenda of jihad taught in the Quran, or he may have been in fact a practicing Muslim and this was an independent act of Islamic terrorism striking out against Western Culture or there is even the possibly that Mr. Cho may have been part of or used by an Islamic sleeper cell.
A rambling note left in Cho's dorm room reportedly railed for several pages against "rich kids" and "debauchery" and "deceitful charlatans" on campus, and at one point states, "You caused me to do this."

An English professor said Cho's creative-writing work was so disturbing that he had been referred to on-campus counseling services. In one class, he refused to speak and signed his name using a question mark. Fellow pupils called him "The Question Mark Kid."

Cho, a senior majoring in English from Centreville, Va., had been taking medication for depression, and had also recently set fire to a dorm room and stalked women.

Identification was delayed nearly 24 hours after the end of the rampage because Cho was carrying no ID, had no police record, and had severely damaged his own face when he killed himself. A positive match was finally made with fingerprints on immigration records.

"He was a loner, and we're having difficulty finding information about him,"
Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker said Tuesday morning.

Larry Hincker is the College spokesman that led the defeat of a state bill in 2006, that would have allowed eligible students and faculty to carry a fire arms for personal self defence

Cho was born in South Korea on Jan. 18, 1984 and entered the United States in 1992 as a child of 8. He was a permanent resident alien, a "green card" holder entitled to most of the legal rights held by U.S. citizens.

The Last Hours
Cho's last hours apparently began with the killings of freshman veterinary student Emily Hilscher, 19, and senior Ryan "Stack" Clark, a resident advisor, at about 7:15 a.m. in the West Ambler Johnson residence hall.

Hilscher's connection to Cho is not clear. The police who responded to 911 calls described the incident as a "domestic dispute," implying that she and the gunman had some sort of relationship, but at least one report said they did not know each other. "As far as we can tell, wrong place, wrong time," said John W. McCarthy, an administrator for rural Rappahannock County, Va., where Hilscher's family lives, to the Washington Post. "She was a beautiful, smart, great kid.” It seems that Clark tried to intervene and was killed for his trouble.

Cho was gone by the time police arrived at the West Ambler Johnston residence. Officers told the nearly 900 resident students to stay in their rooms; they began questioning a mutual acquaintance of Hilscher and Clark and considered the incident essentially over.

‘Could He Be a School Shooter???'
Professor Roy told the New York Times she tutored Cho individually in the fall of 2005 after his writings and behavior had intimidated his classmates. During the sessions, she said, he wore sunglasses and a baseball cap pulled low on his forehead.

"He seemed to be crying behind his sunglasses," Roy told the newspaper.
She also said she had been so worried about tutoring Cho that she developed a plan with her assistant — if she mentioned the name of a dead professor, the assistant would know to call campus security.

The Web site The Smoking Gun on Tuesday posted a play Cho allegedly wrote last year. Entitled "Richard McBeef," the violent, possibly darkly comic one-act play concerns an argument between the title character and his 13-year-old stepson, who accuses him of murdering his father and of pedophilia.

The play seems sympathetic to the stepfather, who tries to defend himself in vain against his wife and stepson's accusations. It ends on an ambiguous note, with the stepfather swinging a "deadly blow" at the boy.

• Click here to read the play, which is short on character development but has plenty of foul language and violence.

"When we read Cho's plays, it was like something out of a nightmare," former classmate Ian MacFarlane, now an AOL employee, wrote in a blog posted on an AOL Web site. "The plays had really twisted, macabre violence that used weapons I wouldn't have even thought of."

He said he and other students "were talking to each other with serious worry about whether he could be a school shooter."

Poet Nikki Giovanni, one of his professors, told a cable news channel Wednesday that her students were so unnerved by Cho's behavior that she had security check on her room and eventually had him taken out of her class. Some students had stopped coming to class, saying Cho was taking photos of them with his cell phone, she said.
Giovanni told the Washington Post that after one instance when Cho recited his poetry in class, seven out of 70 students showed up for the next meeting.

She asked about the absences, and was told the other students were afraid of Cho.
"It was not bad poetry. It was intimidating," Giovanni said of his writing. "At first I thought, OK, he's trying to see what the parameters are. Kids curse and talk about a lot of different things. He stayed in that spot. I said, 'you can't do that.’ He said, 'Yes, I can.’ I said, 'No, not in my class.'"

"We always joked we were just waiting for him to do something, waiting to hear about something he did," said another classmate, Stephanie Derry. "But when I got the call it was Cho who had done this, I started crying, bawling."

Cho has not been tied to two campus bomb threats in the past three weeks, but a note detailing a third bomb threat was found near the bodies in Norris Hall. On Wednesday morning, yet another bomb threat had campus police evacuate Burrus Hall, another school building.

Mysterious Writings
Sources also told the Tribune about the strange inscription on one of Cho's arms — the words "ISMAIL AX" in red ink. The reference may be to the Biblical sacrifice of Abraham, in which God commands the patriarch to sacrifice his own son. Abraham begins to comply, but God intervenes at the last moment to save the boy.

In the Jewish and Christian traditions, the son is Isaac, father of the Jewish people; in Islam, it is his older half-brother, Ishmael, or Ishmael in Hebrew.
Abraham uses a knife in most versions of the story, but some accounts have him wielding an ax.

A more obscure reference may be to a passage in the Koran referring to Abraham's destruction of pagan idols; in some accounts, he uses an ax to do so.

THE BOTTOM LINE: No doubt Cho was mentally and socially unbalanced, there was however, obviously some connection to Islam. The extent of that connection may never be known, either because it is being covered up, or simply because the information will never be available for any number of reasons.

Reminiscent of the Columbine massacre, trying to understand why people go off the tracks is of little value in preventing this in the future. The truth is we will not prevent this in the future, some people have dysfunctional hearts, and some have lame limbs, some people’s brains fall short of that mysterious categorization of what is acceptable as functionally normal. No amount of trying to understand this will prevent this from reoccurring.

The only way to deal with this inevitability is to ask oneself and ones leaders, what are we going to do different the next time. In this case we did exactly the same thing as at Columbine, and guess what, we got the same result. I hope our society hasn’t become as insane as these mentally deranged maniacs. Since offence is not an option then a proper defence is an obvious alternative. While it may not totally prevent an incident or even prevent someone from being killed it will prevent an out of control situation such as we have had at Columbine, Virginia Tech and the Amish massacre. One Student or teacher with a gun could have reduced a 32 person bloody massacre to two or three, to say nothing of the eventual deterrent. There is a logical reason why this happens in a gun free zone, being mentally ill doesn't mean that one is necessarily stupid, there are no guns in a gun free zone to deter this kind of behavior.
There is a high probability that the only stupid ones, are those that enable this kind of tragedy, the passive anti-American anti self-defense crowd...

de Andréa

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

University assemblage lead in prayer to Allah, but not Jesus

Speakers also called on Buddha, and the Dalai Lama
By de Andrea
One can only conclude that America has become anything but a Christian Nation. Speakers at the Virginia Tech gathering called on Allah and Buddha along with a plethora of other empty spirits in their efforts to minister to the survivors, family, and friends of victims of the shooting massacre at the school – but Jesus wasn't mentioned at all.

President Bush did offer a biblical message of hope, when he suggested the school community that lost 32 members to the shootings by an out-of-control resident alien student find "comfort in the grace and guidance of a loving God.” But even he didn't mention Jesus, the only hope of comfort and future life for Christians and all mankind, into the memorials.

They had several representatives from the local 'religious community.’ The Muslim cleric specifically asked for Allah's blessings… and he didn't shy away from saying the name of Allah. The Jewish speaker asked for God's blessings. Buddha was called upon by a Buddhist leader. The only name not heard was, Jesus Christ."

A Muslim cleric calling the name of Allah and quoting the Quran." A Buddhist Community Leader preaching that mankind is basically 'good”. A Female speaker from the Jewish Community quoting Ecclesiastes: 'There is a time for everything."
A Liberal Lutheran Minister talking about 'healing,' etc. and how everyone needs to come together (blah, blah, blah…).” BUT NOT ONE EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN, or PASTOR MENTIONED THE OF THE NAME OF CHRIST JESUS.

Where was the pastor from the Universal Life 'church' or the 'Church of Satan, and why was a Muslim cleric the first member of the clergy to deliver remarks. By the prominence of the Muslim speaker in the service are we to assume that Virginia Tech is mainly a Muslim student body? Moreover, possibly America has while I wasn’t paying attention become a Muslim Nation.
It was up to President Bush to deliver references to Christianity. "People who have never met you are praying for you," Bush said. "They're praying for your friends who have fallen, and who are injured. There's a power in these prayers, a real power. In times like this, we can find comfort in the grace and the guidance of a loving God”

The other official statements of condolence released also ignored the savior of the Christian faith.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One cannot help but wonder if removing the Christian faith from our school Campuses and now evidently from the Nation as well, has something to do with all the school massacres that have recently plagued this country.

An interesting event occurs when Jesus Christ is excluded from ones life and society, demonic oppression becomes dominant.
Franklin Graham says that Satan is responsable... I think he may be right...

de Andréa



We will protect you, said the Virginia Tech’s Larry Hincker in 2006,

The trouble with a gun free zone is that only the bad guys are free to have guns.

I wonder where Larry Hincker was on April 16, 2007. It is certain that he was not protecting the students of Virginia Tech.

By de Andrea

More than one year before the shooting rampage at Virginia Tech, the Virginia State's General Assembly quashed a bill that would have given qualified college students and employees the right to carry handguns on campus. At the time, Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker said he was happy to hear of the bill's defeat, according to the Roanoke Times.
"I'm sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly's actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus," the Virginia Tech spokesman assured them. Obviously a false sense of security.

One cannot help but wonder how many lives would have been saved if true freedom actually existed in this so-called independent Nation of America; and instead of Congress totally ignoring the Constitution, people had the most basic inalienable right to defend their own lives. Instead we are forced under this demagoguery to depend on people who are obviously totally undependable Thirty two people were killed at Virginia Tech in one of the worst Campus shootings in American history in yet another so-called gun free zone.

The most dangerous place to be on this earth is in a “gun free zone” the Mayer of Nagasaki Japan was recently shot dead in a gun free zone, the highest murder rate in the nation, Washington D.C. is a gun free zone. Nearly all school campuses in the U.S. are “gun free zones”, and yet the only school campuses where one is safe without any kind of gun incidents, are located in the state of Utah where they have no “gun free zones”.

Again, another tragic massacre of our children, that likely for the most part at least, could have been stopped had the blind elite leaders of this society listened to those with vision. A proposed, House Bill # 1572 initiated in 2006 by Del. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah County, on behalf of the Virginia Citizens Defense League could have brought this tragedy to an abrupt halt... But the bill didn't even pass its first stage, the House Committee on Militia, Police, and Public Safety.

Backers of the bill wanted to prohibit public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit from lawfully carry a concealed handgun."

Most universities in Virginia require students and employees, other than police, to check their guns with police or campus security upon entering the campus.

While advocates of gun control often believe they are improving safety, they are actually depriving law-abiding citizens from defending themselves in dangerous situations Todd contended. "Had I been on campus today, and otherwise been entitled to carry firearms for protection and been deprived of that, I don't think words can describe how I would have felt, knowing I could have stopped something like this," Gilbert said. People who are willing to jump through all the legal hoops necessary to get a weapons permit usually are not people society needs to worry about, he argued.

In the spring of 2005, a Virginia Tech student who had a concealed handgun permit was disciplined for bringing a handgun to class, the Roanoke paper reported. Second Amendment groups questioned the university's authority, but the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police argued against guns on campus.

After the gun smoke cleared the authorities identified 23-year-old South Korean Cho Seung-Hui as the killer of thirty two people at Virginia Tech, one of the deadliest shooting rampage in U.S. history. The man was a resident alien enrolled as an undergrad student with an English major at Virginia Tech. His U.S. residence was established in Centreville, after his attempted genocide he was found dead by authorities from apparently self-inflicted wounds.

There were two separate shooting incidents on the Virginia campus, hours apart, but authorities were unclear whether the same shooter was involved in all instances, officials said.
The first 9-1-1 call came at 7:15 a.m. from a residence hall where two people reportedly had been shot.
It took authorities more than two hours to notify the campus, by e-mail, of the first incident.
Asked yesterday by reporters to explain, Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum said initial information led officials to believe it was an isolated event and that the shooter had fled the campus. Only the residence hall, West Ambler Johnston, was locked down, he said.
During those two hours Cho went to the Post Office and mailed his Manifesto and Videos to NBC broadcasting and then returned to continue his murdering rampage.
University President Charles Steger defended his handling of the tragedy, saying he and other officials "had no reason to suspect any other incident was going to occur”. Even though one would think that a fire alarm may have done the job of evacuating the campus, Steger still insisted that it was difficult to inform everyone on campus, with about 11,000 people arriving in the morning, go figure.

The deadliest U.S. campus massacre, until yesterday, took place in 1927 by the principal of the school Mr. Kehoe killing 52 young students; another was at the University of Texas in 1966 when 16 people were killed by Charles Whitman, who opened fire from a clock tower.
In 1999, two teenagers killed 12 fellow students at Columbine High School near Denver Colorado. But yesterday's shooting was the deadliest mass shooting of any kind in U.S. history, a prominent criminologist told the Roanoke Times. James Alan Fox of Northeastern University in Boston said the death toll, which stands at 33, surpasses the 22 people killed in 1991 when a gunman opened fire at a cafeteria in Killeen, Texas.

ABC News reported Virginia Tech students and an employee say the first e-mail warning they got from the university came at 9:26 a.m. By that time, the gunman had struck again.
Virginia Tech student Blake Harrison witnessed the chaos while on his way to a class near Norris Hall. "This teacher comes flying out of Norris; he's bleeding from his arm or his shoulder ... all these students were coming out of Norris trying to take shelter in Randolph [Hall]. All these kids were freaked out," Harrison said, according to Fox News. The students and faculty were barricading themselves in their classrooms. The shooter was "wearing a vest covered in clips was just unloading on their door, going from classroom to classroom ... they said it never seemed like it was going to stop and there was just blood all over," Harrison said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Because of the ignorance of these brain-dead, anti-gun, America hating, blind elitists who can’t seem to intellectually see beyond the end of their liberal noses, we have yet another school massacre in a “gun free zone”. In a perfect world there would be no need for weapons of any kind. I always seem to be the barer of bad news but I have to tell you the truth, we do not live in a perfect world.

On a personal note I wish these airhead liberal elitists would either get in touch with the realities of this world, or get off of it, so that the rest of us just might survive.

One would think that the elite academia of both government and higher indoctrination institutions would have at least been prepared for the realities of life by lessons learned early in ones life from children’s stories such as the three little pigs, Goldie locks, and the big bad wolf. The reality is, the wolf came to the door of Virginia Tech, and this friend is why we have guns and the Second Amendment.

One must ask, what will happen when an organized Islamic terrorist cell decides that it is time to attack the most vulnerable places on American soil; “ The Gun Free Zones” of our schools...

de Andrea

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Angry truckers to encircle D.C. and State Capitals with 'blockade

'This in Protest against the administrations plan to allow Mexican long-haulers on U.S. roads as part of the first incremental steppes of Bush’s Theocratic Religion of Globalism and the Cue of the demise of a Sovereign free America and the subsequent rise of the new North American Union…

By de Andrea

Is it just a coincidence that Bush’s Theocracy of Globalism and the Theocracy of Islam have a common goal? Both have an agenda to create a Utopian global Government.
President Bush says Mexicans in the U.S. do only jobs that Americans will not do, how does this include long haul truck drivers Mr. President?

American truckers plan to circle the White House and the state capitals across the U.S. in a "rolling blockade" to protest Bush’s federal plan to allow Mexican long-haul rigs to operate throughout the U.S.

Drivers who participate in "Truck-Out" also are being asked to run their rigs at the minimum speed permitted by law.

The protest is scheduled for April 23-25 to coordinate with the "Hold Their Feet to the Fire" rally and radio talk show marathon in Washington planned by the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

"American truckers are going to have their jobs undercut or vanish into the hands of Mexican truck drivers as this Department of Transportation pilot project gains permanency," said Frosty Wooldridge, a writer, and talk-show host who drove 18-wheelers for two decades.

Wooldridge first called for the Truck-Out protest in a column at the end of March, asking truckers in the border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California to participate.

The idea expanded to a national boycott when Wanda Piety, a California independent business owner, joined Wooldridge in planning "Truck-Out".
"Every American truck driver's job is at risk," Wooldridge said. "American drivers are going to see their wages undermined or they will lose their jobs altogether to Mexican drivers and Mexican trucking companies."

Despite congressional opposition, Bush expects to begin within weeks a pilot test that will allow Mexican trucks to operate freely across the U.S. A spokesman for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Ian Grossman, said the agency plans to grant the first authority as early as the end of this month.

Wooldridge said he expects Mexican truck drivers to haul loads for considerably less than half the cost of U.S. truck drivers. "Jobs will vanish for American truckers," he contended. "The independents are going to be run right out of the business."

The Department of Transportation's Mexican truck pilot test is obviously part of a broader Bush administration plan to open the border. There's a problem in this country, and it revolves around George W Bush's plans with Mexico. The plan to allow Mexican trucks into the U.S. is part of [the North America Free Trade Agreement] which Bush has used to advance his Globalists cue of a new country called the North American Union, created from the ashes of Mexico, the U.S., and Canada.

Todd Spencer, executive vice president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, the OOIDA, said his group shares "in the outrage that is being felt by the folks who are organizing and participating in the 'Truck-Out.'"

While OOIDA is not sponsoring or endorsing the protest, Spencer said the group is "encouraging our members to fully exercise their rights and responsibilities as American citizens to work within the system and convey their indignation to their elected officials."

"It is simply outrageous that our government plans to allow Mexican trucks full reign of U.S. highways even before all safety, economic and homeland security concerns are completely and appropriately addressed," he said.

"The growing opposition to the pilot program and the overall effort to grant cross-border truckers immediate and direct access into the United States should not be ignored," he said.

"People have a right to be concerned with the Mexican truck pilot program," said Hunter, "especially when it could potentially compromise their safety and our nation's security.” Moreover, are these Mexican trucker Insured? Probably not, what if one of these trucks collides with an American driver??? Good Luck America …

Hunter stressed the reasons he has introduced the NAFTA Trucking Safety Act, noting it's "important that the implementing authority listen to and thoroughly address these concerns before moving forward with the program."

THE BOTTOM LINE: President Bush’s actions depict a very confused man, especially when it comes to the Domestic Security. While in the short term at least, except for several independent terrorist attacks around the country, his Home Security and the sharing of Intel has generally kept the country safe from a repeat of the 911 attack by the Nation of Islam.
On the other hand Bush’s long term security leaves much to be desired. One cannot help but wonder if his tunnel-vision for this Globalist Utopian Kingdom that his whole family has for this New World Order first introduced by his Dad George Bush Senior, has clouded his mind and has put the future security of this free and independent Nation of America at peril.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) first introduced by George Bush Senior and finally signed into law by President Clinton was just the precursor for the Bush family’s North American Union (NAU) agenda. Moreover, the Transportation Corridor, (the Giant Mile wide Highway from Mexico to Canada cutting the U.S. in half) and this introduction of Mexican truckers taking away American jobs in the U.S. are all just incremental steps toward the implementation of this surreptitious matrix of the NORTH AMERICAN UNION.

Good Luck OOIDA…

de Andréa

Saturday, April 14, 2007


War, In The Defence Of Our Country, May No Longer Be Politically Correct
By de Andréa

Unless in the near future, we elect a Congress and a President with spine enough to take political correctness and stuff it in the eye of the rest of the world, we may eventually find ourselves in a truly defensive position. This means instead of fighting an aggressive war against a definitive enemy, we will be fighting for our very survival in the defence of our lives right here in our own neighborhoods.

If there is any doubt of this, then one only needs to familiarize themselves with the oppression, murder and genocide that goes on in any country that has been infiltrated with a significant number of Muslims such as in Indonesia, Lebanon, or central and west Africa.

To wage war means that a country is aggressively and offensively engaging an enemy that is a threat to one’s country and way of life, with the objective of winning at any cost, at the very top of the priority scale.

It apparently has become so politically fashionable to be exceedingly concerned as to the political methodology that we use to fight a war that we have lost sight of, and sacrificed the military objective. This mistake could eventually reduce our objective of fighting and winning war, to the fundamental last ditch effort of simple survival.

As I have often written in the past, the first concern in the process of going to war is to decide who the enemy is that one is actually going to war with, this usually goes with out saying, of course that was before the religion of Political Correctness took over as the State Religion in America. The second priority is to learn everything there is to know about one’s enemy before a shot is ever fired. It took the Crusaders 300 years to understand Islam’s Agenda, but they didn’t have the advantage of history.

Neither of these priorities was accomplished before going to war with Afghanistan or Iraq. We blindly went to war against a method of warfare, [TERRORISM] as if like any other [ISM] as in the case of Nazism or Communism, this was and ideology.

First, one must identify one’s enemy; to say that one is at war with terrorism is to purposely misidentify this enemy. Terrorism is not a country; moreover, terrorism is not a people, terrorism is not even a philosophical ideal such as Nazism, however Islam is, and with the intention of world domination. Terrorism is simply a tool or method of fighting an enemy such as gorilla warfare. It is no different than saying that guns are the cause of crime rather than the criminal, and then going to war against guns which may have become a tool of the criminal or a method of terrorizing ones victim, and instead of arresting the criminal himself we let him run lose in our society to continue his crime, because after all, the enemy is the gun and not the criminal, right? This of course would be absurd.

In the case of Iraq, to say that we are at war against terrorism is to avoid identifying the enemy, which is in fact a Nation, as it has been in all previous wars in history. This war is fundamentally against the Nation of Islam who has vowed to destroy us. Terrorism is just the tool or the way this enemy fights a war, this is defined in their book The War of World Conquest, titled the Quran. And yet we ignore the enemy while he runs lose in our country unchallenged, using yet another tool, the tool of Infiltration, which when used silently is very effective especially when our Government refuses to Identify this enemy.

Secondly, these two priorities are progressive, meaning that if one does not accomplish the first one, one is not in the position of carrying out the second. This administration has not done its homework in learning everything there is to know about this enemy, and as a result our entire country has been compromised. President Bush and nearly everyone in the Federal Government are incapable of understanding this enemy, because they have not yet identified whom or what this enemy is.

Islam since the year 610 AD has had the agenda of conquering the world, this is an historical fact. It has never really stopped, only the tactics have been modified from time to time. Moreover this is not the first time in our history that we have been at war with Islam, remember Tripoli?

We mistakenly have become a Military at war, against a nasty weapon of war, (terror). This is, as opposed to a Nation at war with a Nation. A military cannot truly win a war against a weapon, because the weapon is not the enemy. This has from the very beginning tragically been labeled as a war on terror, instead of a war with the Nation of Islam. Our enemy has been labeled as terrorists, insurgents, extremists, Jihadist, fundamentalists, and then a laundry list of Organizations such as Hamas, Al-Qaida, Taliban, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and then all the different tribes such as Sunnis, Shiite, Wahhabists, or whatever; all part of the nation of Islam, who’s Theocracy is to take control of the entire world and or kill everyone including themselves.

All proof that we haven’t really yet decided who this enemy is. Is it really any wonder why the American people have a difficult time getting behind our military with the support they need to win this war? We don’t know who we are fighting.

This Administration must get a spine and identify this enemy as the Nation of Islam and let it be known that we are at war with all Muslim Nations. Moreover any Muslim Nation that becomes a threat to the U.S., or its allies, Israel or Great Britain such as Iran is, in threatening to blow Israel off the map, will be bombed. Moreover as we did in the Second World War with Germany and Japan, remove or intern this enemy from this Nation, close the boarders in order to stop this uncontrolled foreign invasion of Islam from pouring into this country unchallenged by the hundreds everyday along with whomever else has a desire to illegally invade this Nation.

If this or something similar is not done, this type of ignorant warfare will go down in history as the most insane mistake that a country at war has ever made. We don’t even know that we have invited the very enemy into this country to live amoung us, and to infiltrate our governments and our entire public educational systems that has vowed to kill us, simply because we have not yet identified who this enemy of freedom is. We have only identified the method that they intend to attack us with, (Terrorism, suicide bombing, crashing our air liners, or shooting guns at us in a mall or on the street). Their refusal to wear a uniform is part an parcel of the stealthy terrorism method Islam uses to wage war on the world, and we are playing right into our enemy’s hands by letting them dictate the rules of war by refusing to Identifying them as Middle Eastern Muslim Men from the nation of Islam. After all that would be profiling our enemy and that is Politically Incorrect and that my friend will lead to our demise.
"Anytime one ignores the truth for any reason, one will eventually be consumed by it."

de Andréa

Thursday, April 12, 2007

More Persecution of Christians in America

The Gideon Bible Foundation facing charges for being on public land, Florida says no one can be within 500 feet of a public school

By de Andréa
March 09, 2007

The Gideon International foundation has been giving Bibles to school children all over the world in 181 countries in 82 Languages virtually unmolested for nearly 200 years ; that is, until now.

Two Florida men who wanted to give Bibles to children in their community have been charged under a little used state law that bans anyone from being within 500 feet of the land on which schools are built unless they have "legitimate business or prior authorization." Apparently Christians giving Bibles to Children is no longer classified a legitimate, not in Key Largo Florida anyway.

Anthony Mirto and Ernest Simpson of Monroe County Florida in Key Largo were arrested, booked into jail, and charged with trespassing because they were handing out Bibles while standing on a public sidewalk adjacent to a school. Those trespassing charges were dismissed on a motion from lawyers from the Alliance Defence Fund who challenged them on factual and constitutional grounds.

But Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman said he'd been notified that the two men now are being re-charged under a different statute, this one banning anyone from being on public property within 500 feet of a school property without "prior authorization or legitimate business."

He said the law also includes an exemption for someone who lives within that distance from a school property. "This obviously is unconstitutional for several reasons," Cortman said. "The First Amendment gives you a right to be out there and engage in speech. Is anyone who uses the sidewalk or [the adjacent] highway now in violation?"

He said another issue is the definition of "legitimate business.” It's not for the government to apply those words using one definition to one group of people, and then apply those words using another definition to another group of people, he said.
"The government is not allowed to have unbridled discretion to define words in whatever manner they choose," he said. The Gideon’s have been legitimate for about 200 years now, but apparently not in the State of Florida.

On the face of the statute cited by the prosecutor, people driving by the school on the highway technically are in violation of the law, unless they have an exemption, and if the same exemption doesn't apply to the two members of the Gideon’s, then that creates a content-based speech restriction, which also isn't proper, Cortman said.

"The question I have is why the state is so intent on punishing these gentlemen for passing out Bibles on public property?" he asked. "This in America is just beyond comprehension."

The arrest happened Jan. 19, 2007 when Mirto and Simpson were on the sidewalk outside of Key Largo School in Key Largo, Fla., and were distributing copies of the Bible to those interested.

A written report from the ADF on the case confirmed that neither man entered school grounds. Despite that, the school's principal called police, and an officer from the Monroe County sheriff's office asked the men to leave immediately or face trespassing charges. As the men prepared to leave, the officer decided to arrest both individuals, the report said.

"Officials cannot use fear of arrest as a means of bullying law-abiding Christians into silence," Cortman said. "These men broke no laws when they decided to communicate their message on a public sidewalk."

In a statement at the outset of the case, Becky Herrin, of the public information office in the Monroe County sheriff's office, stated as a fact that the defendants in the case did trespass.

But the report revealed the two were arrested while in their truck. The report said that on the complaint from school Principal Annette Martinson, when the two defendants were ordered by the deputy to leave an area that included a bike path, "both defendants slowly walked away towards a pick up truck that was parked in front of the school."

The officer then confirms, "I observed both defendants enter the pick up truck and remain seated inside.” He watched for several minutes, then approached the pickup truck, "I asked both defendants why they where refusing to leave," and "Defendant Simpson III stated, we where just leaving." Perez then confirmed that after he got a call from the sheriff's office notifying him that Simpson was complaining "about a deputy at the Key Largo School asking him to leave, I advised Sgt. Mixon I was out with Simpson and he was going to be placed under arrest for trespassing."

The Gideon’s, are a “legitimate” Christian organization founded in the late 1800s, has as its "sole purpose" the goal "to win men, women, boys and girls to a saving knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ through association for service, personal testimony, and distributing the Bible in the human traffic lanes and streams of everyday life."

The organization has for the last 200 years focused on hotels and motels, hospitals and nursing homes, schools, colleges and universities, the military and law enforcement and prisons and jails.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It appears to be open season on Christians these days. One cannot help but wonder what would have happened if the Politically Correct School Administration of Key Largo School would have encountered a couple of Imams handing out Qurans, instead of these two Gideon’s handing out Bibles. My best guess is that there would have been a fear that they were there to blow up the school, but because of their “Political Correct Religion” which forbids profiling, the whole thing would have been handled very discreetly. Moreover, the Muslim Imams would then have been allowed to continue because unlike how the Government treats Christians, we surely don’t want the Muslims to get their prayer rugs in a bunch now do we?

Maybe we should turn this case over to the Federal “persecutors” that like to put border guards in jail instead of the drug runners that they are paid to prosecute…

de Andréa .

Wednesday, April 11, 2007


How Does One know If One Is Free?

By de Andréa
April 11, 2007

We used to define freedom by…, well, by definition. However, we may now only be able to define freedom by comparison.

We used to have freedom of speech; now, even our thoughts are regulated, we have the food police, if we say anything that might offend anyone we could be charged a hate crime, if we wear a piece of clothing that someone finds offensive we are told that we must remove it or face expulsion what ever that means. If we fly the wrong flag in the wrong place or at the wrong time, we might be accused of violating someone’s civil rights, and find ourselves in court. If we pray in a public place, we are accused of violating the Separation of Church and State law. You know; I have never been able to find that illusive law, oh well; it must be somewhere right?

It use to be, that we were concerned with the crime someone may have committed; but now we are only concerned with what the perpetrator was thinking at the time of the crime, i.e. was it a hate crime? We must wear a seat belt and a brain bucket and be strapped in a carrier in the backseat; we can’t wear a tee shirt that has a picture of a gun on it, or defend our own lives even in the face of imminent danger, even if you are a cop it my not be politically correct to do so.

We can no longer eat transfats. We must eat Omega 3’s. We can’t eat tuna, because it may have mercury in it, or use lead paint, asbestos or DDT. Mac Donald’s must serve garden Salads and Wall-Mart must provide health Insurance and a battery of other benefits, one cannot work for less the minimum wage. We must use MTBE instead of lead in our gasoline or in our bullets, we can’t use lacquer paint, instead we must use an approved paint so toxic that one whiff can cause liver damage. Our children cannot play at recess because they might get hurt; instead they face arrest by the obesity police because of lack of exercise.

We can’t teach Christianity in our schools but we can teach Darwinism or how to be a Muslim, Nazi, or a Socialist and you must feed your children Ritalin (Methylphenidate) an extreemly dangerous drug that turns the little people into zombi's so that it is easyier to brainwash them and has killed some children, if parents refuse, the Child protection agency will take them away and put them in and institution for their own safety. In Addition in California if a parent spanks his child he could find himself in jail for child abuse. We have the speech police, the thought police, the food police, the prayer police, and the enviro-police. We cannot smoke a cigar or anything else for that matter, alone, inside our own home.

While our backs were turned listening to the irresponsible pro-choice people about a woman’s right to choose, all the rest of us, seem to have lost the right to choose what to wear what to think what to eat what to drive, how to raise our kids, what to say, when or where to pray or how much Co2 we can exhale.

There is a Bill right now floating around the House of Representatives Introduced by Nancy Pelosi, that if passed will do away with the last part of the First Amendment completely, the part that says: “to Petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. One will not be able to contact their representatives, in other words no more representation in this Democracy. How long do you think freedom will last in America or anywhere else for that Matter??? Oh well, Most of us don’t exercise our Right of Redress anyway. That reminds me of something my Daddy use to say: “Son, if you don’t use it, you’ll lose it”, in this case it may have been a prophecy.

But we still live in a free country right? I think one would have a difficult time selling the idea of freedom in America by definition anymore. But if we use the example of freedom by comparison, I think we still may have a case. In other words, do we have more freedom than, lets say, Communist China? Well, one would hope so… Do we have more freedom than Rwanda or Darfur or Iran? Well of course we do, but does that mean that we are still free to make our own choices? Yes, if you choose from what is left, after the government gets finished regulating away most of our choices. One day we will wake up and find that our Government has relieved us of the burden of making any choices at all. I mean how many choices do we have left? Do you think they will stop this incremental crawl toward oppression and tyranny? No, why would they? Especially when we continue to enable them by ignoring them and thinking, oh well, this is still the freest nation in the world right? Yes, but for how long???

While I understand that some of these taboos are suppose to be for our own safety, I often wonder how we ever survived without them. I remember driving my Dad’s car when I was only four years old, sitting on my Dads lap with no seat belt, parish the thought, and playing kick ball, a thing of the past, or eating lima beans with hot bacon grease poured over the top, I think that is a death sentence now.

I remember riding on the handle bars of my uncle’s bike without a helmet and getting my foot caught in the spokes and ripping most of the hide off of my ankle and foot. I remember playing foot ball in a schoolyard again without a helmet, and after catching a pass while running backwards I turned around only to come to an abrupt stop against an eight inch thick steel basketball pole, after waking up I was told that I broke my nose and had a concussion, or as a kid walking on a construction site, stepping on a nail and looking at it sticking out through the top of my foot, sometimes we paid for our choices.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The point being, there was a time that we were still free to make our own choices, right or wrong, good or bad. “If we sacrifice freedom in trade for safety, we deserve neither”. I think someone important in history said that once.

We used to learn from our mistakes of making bad choices. As our choices are depleted we learn less and less, maybe that is why we have a growing society of ignoramuses.

How much longer are we going to drink this liberal Kool aid and watch our freedom incrementally and surreptitiously be deluded and our country turned into a police State???

Haven’t we sat in the bleachers long enough letting the left wing liberal socialist despots liquefy our once solid freedom and watch it drain right out through our fingers???

Why not take your Congressman to lunch; wear your helmets, and buy him some organic lettuce picked by someone that will do the work Americans won’t do…

de Andréa