Tuesday, April 25, 2017

FBI Violates 1st Amendment And Assaults Citizen

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

 

FBI Violates 1st Amendment And Assaults Citizen

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 25, 2017


Sent to me by one of my subscribers who chooses to remain anonymous on my blog: 

Photographing the exterior of Federal Buildings
A letter to FBI Director Comey
Last week, David Warden, a former Police Officer, and currently of YouTube channel, News Now Houston -
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC39jLNl2UpxDeYVYCToA56A - was legally filming the El Paso FBI field office building from a public sidewalk when he was physically detained and his camera seized. FBI Agents did not appear to have probable cause for a detainment. Mr. Warden subsequently complained of an injury to his left arm as a result of the physical contact by agents. The full video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npxnlhQEtJw . (Be aware of some profane language.)

David is part of a group of photographic journalist activists who specifically conduct “audits” for the purpose of testing whether law enforcement will respect individual’s rights to film public buildings from a public location. Mr.  Warden’s goal is not to illicit any response from law enforcement but to ‘verify’ an individual’s First Amendment rights are not violated. Given the negative response, there will likely be complaints filed (at minimum) against the FBI and special agent in charge (acting) Scott Brunner who was present during Mr. Warden’s detainment. Additionally, negative responses by officers such as this encounter, will generally result in additional activists visiting the same facility in greater numbers to conduct additional First Amendment Audits. As such, I highly recommend the El Paso Office review its procedures regarding individuals filming public buildings.

Refusal to be identified:
Texas Penal Code Section 38.02
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information. - See more at: http://codes.findlaw.com/tx/penal-code/penal-sect-38-02.html#sthash.uszA16Xq.dpuf

1st Amendment right to Film:
Please refer to case Turner v. Driver, US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in February of 2018, which clarified that citizens to have the right under the first amendment to film law enforcement in the course of their duties.

Law Enforcement Procedures regarding individuals filming federal buildings:
May I direct your attention to US Department of Homeland Security Bulletin HQ-1B-012-2010 issued 08/02/2010 (attached) directed towards Federal Protective Services (FPS). While this bulletin is directed towards FPS/PSO’s, the guidance applies to any law enforcement agency in regards to an encounter with an individual taking pictures or video of any federal building.

Specifically:
“…Remember, that the public has a right to photograph the exterior of federal facilities from publicly accessible spaces such as streets, sidewalks…”
“Because the initial interview is voluntary, PSO’s should not seize the camera or its contents, and must be cautious not to give such “orders” to a photographer…. As this constitutes a seizure or detention.”

Lastly, I should note that none of the activists involved are Sovereign Citizens or dislike the police. To the contrary, they greatly respect the police, however they wish their rights were not violated simply for pulling out a camera and walking down the street.
Signed: Concerned Citizen and FBI Infraguard Member
End
THE BOTTOM LINE: Most of my readers know that I too have been illegally harassed and threatened by the FBI for simply writing the truth.  As in any illegal unconstitutional Federal organization without any oversight to speak of, they tend to get out of control even to the point of becoming the very description of crimes they claim to be protecting us from. Since the 1920’s the FBI has illegally become a Federal Police Department/Gestapo, instead of just an investigative department that it was intended to be.  

Let FBI Director James Comey know that you are watching his agents.
You can cut and paste this letter to your email and sent it to James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov

Watch two more related videos: Warning - Be aware of some profane language.


Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Monday, April 24, 2017

The Ignorance Of The U.S. Government



The Ignorance Of The U.S. Government

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 24, 2017



The Ignorance of General Mattis and the Fatah Tautology

On Friday, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis visited Israel as part of a tour of the region that will bring him to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Djibouti. The declared purpose of Mattis’s trip is to “reaffirm key US military alliances, engage with strategic partners in the Middle East and Africa, and discuss cooperative efforts to counter destabilizing activities and defeat extremist terror organizations.”
Ahead of his visit, Mattis should have spent some time considering the hunger strike being carried out by the Palestinian terrorists imprisoned by Israel. A serious consideration of the strike will tell him more about the nature of the Palestinian conflict with Israel than a hundred “expert” briefings.
There are several important things for Mattis to consider in relation to the strike. 
The first thing he needs to note is that all of the terrorists on strike are members of the Fatah terrorist group. This fact should signal to General Mattis that Fatah is not a normal political party. In fact, it is a terrorist organization that has a political party.  Is Mattis too blind to consider that the strike is supported by the international Left?  To understand, Mattis needs to recognize the Fatah tautology.
But first, a bit of background.
The terrorists’ strike is the brainchild of convicted mass murderer, Fatah leader and darling of the international Left, Marwan Barghouti.  Barghouti is serving five life sentences in prison for murdering five Israelis. Israeli authorities believe Barghouti was directly responsible for 37 murders, but were only able to convict him on five counts.
Barghouti’s role in the killings goes far beyond the terrorist attacks he directly ordered.  From 2000 until his arrest in 2002, Barghouti was the commander and mastermind of the Palestinian terror war that began in September 2000 after Fatah leader Yasser Arafat rejected Palestinian statehood at Camp David.
In other words, hundreds of Israelis are dead today because of Barghouti.  But for the Left, none of this matters. For the Left, Barghouti is a hero.  The Left insists Barghouti is a moderate and a peacemaker and that Israel should release him and let him take over Fatah and the PLO from octogenarian Mahmoud Abbas. There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim.
They insist this because of the Fatah tautology.
According to the tautology, Fatah is “moderate” and “pro-peace.” Barghouti is a leader of Fatah. Therefore Barghouti is moderate and pro-peace.  It’s just taqiyyah my friend.  Since Fatah is touted as “moderate” and “pro-peace,” it of course isn’t considered a terrorist organization. And since it isn’t a terrorist organization, its terrorists are seen as moderate peace-activists.
So despite the protests of irritating Israeli terrorism victims, and the verdict of the court, Barghouti isn’t a terrorist and none of the terrorists he commanded are terrorists. None of them are terrorists because they are members of Fatah. And Fatah is a moderate, pro-peace party. So they are moderate peace activists.
Under this tautological reasoning, it makes sense for the US to give nearly a billion dollars a year in aid to the terrorist Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority. It makes sense for the Pentagon to train Palestinian “security forces” who double as Fatah terrorists. It makes sense for the US to turn an ignorant blind eye to the fact that the PA spends more than $300 million, or more than 7% of its donor-financed budget, to pay salaries to terrorists in Israeli prisons and their families.
After all, the Palestinians can’t be incentivizing terrorism can they?  They’re from Fatah and Fatah is ignorantly seen as a moderate peace party.  The Fatah tautology is what informed The New York Times’ decision to publish an op-ed by Barghouti in its Sunday edition in support of the prisoners’ strike.  Not surprisingly, Barghouti slandered Israel repeatedly in his essay.
Also not surprisingly, in its tagline the Times described Barghouti as a “Palestinian leader and parliamentarian.” It would be bad enough if this circular reasoning was relegated to the fever swamps of the Left.
But it isn’t.
Numbered among Fatah’s most fervent supporters are Mattis and his fellow generals at the US Military’s Central Command.
Mattis arrived in Israel with a public record replete with anti-Israel statements that indicate he swallowed the Fatah tautology hook, line and sinker.  In 2013, shortly after retiring from his post as Centcom commander, General Mattis resonated Barghouti and his leftist supporters when he blamed Israel for the absence of peace.  Speaking at the Aspen Institute Mattis said that the US must make the establishment of a state run by Fatah terrorists – on land Israel controls, that it requires for its national security and that it has sovereign rights to – a key US goal.  In his words, “We’ve got to find a way to make the so-called two-state solution that Democrat and Republican administrations have supported. We’ve got to get there, and the chances for its starting are starting to ebb because of the settlements and where they’re at, they’re going to make it impossible to maintain the two-state option.”
Also echoing Barghouti’s libels, Mattis said that if Israel continues to allow Jews to live where they have rights to live and property rights to build then it will become an “apartheid” state.  Mattis is allegedly a very smart, well-read man. And yet, his claims show that despite his so-called intelligence, he has a stunning lack of intellectual historical curiosity about Israel and the Palestinians and their positions in the wider Middle East.
When asked point blank to name Israel’s capital, Mattis refused to acknowledge that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Instead, he stunned lawmakers when he proclaimed that Tel Aviv is the capital of the Jewish state.  Mattis’s hostile view of Israel and the Palestinians isn’t surprising. And the reason it isn’t surprising isn’t because Mattis is a member in good standing of the lunatic Left. He’s not.  Mattis’s ignorance is understandable because he hails from the US Military’s Central Command. The Pentagon’s area command responsible for the Middle East has one debilitating problem. It is a problem that guarantees that Centcom officers will fail to understand the Middle East and fail to ever win America’s wars in the region.
Centcom’s problem is that it deliberately does not include Israel.  As far as Centcom is concerned, Israel is not part of the Middle East. Israel is in Europe.  Centcom officers speak only to Arabs. And their Arab counterparts insist that Israel is the problem.
Rather than critically analyze this claim, Centcom officers internalize it.  Rather than notice and get irritated by the fact that due to their Arab colleagues’ antisemitism the US is forced to pretend that Israel is located on a completely different continent, Mattis and his underlings adopted their reason-bereft prejudice.
Rather than rebel against their inability to communicate directly with their Israeli counterparts and insist that they be permitted to bring the US’s closest ally in the Middle East into their regional plans and analyses, Centcom officers have embraced the irrational and strategically catastrophic view that the main source of instability in the Middle East are the Israeli communities located beyond the 1949 armistice lines.
Mattis’s visit will take him to Jerusalem, rather than Tel Aviv. No doubt Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will mention that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital and express his enthusiastic support for moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.  But as far as Israel’s relations with the US generally and the Pentagon specifically are concerned, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem is of secondary importance.
The most important contribution Israel can make to the US war against so-called “extremist terrorism” and to the Trump administration’s efforts to “reaffirm key military alliances,” is for Netanyahu to insist that the Trump administration stop accepting the bigoted dictates of the Arabs. He must insist that Israel be integrated into Centcom. Only when the American officers responsible for determining US policies in the Middle East recognize that Israel is part of the Middle East will they have the cognitive capacity to understand the realities of the region. And the first reality that will become clear to them is that despite the Fatah tautology, Fatah is a terrorist organization, not unlike ISIS.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Well the bottom line is, that none of these so-called military leaders have ever read anything about the historical existence of Palestine.  Truth is, that it doesn’t in fact exist. And neither do Palestinians for that matter. The entire Palestinian issue is a fraud. The Historical land was called Canaan and the people Semites, yes Semites since 3200 BC Semites are Jews.  Muslims didn’t even exist until after 610 AD that is 3800 years later.  Plus if you click on the highlighted hyperlink you will discover that Palestine is a fictitious name given to the area after the devastation of the Jewish nation by the Romans in 70 AD. There were no people in history ever called Palestinians.
Read your sixth grade history book…come on!
Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Sunday, April 23, 2017

Breaking: Largest Armada Of Naval Ships Since WWII

Breaking: Largest Armada Of Naval Ships Since WWII

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 23, 2017



Two more Aircraft Carrier groups will join the US expedition to North Korea

Everyone has been talking for the past week about the aircraft carrier strike group President Donald Trump dispatched toward the Korean peninsula as a warning to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, but Kim seems not to have gotten the message thus far, considering his grand military parade and continued provocative missile launches.
But according to a report from South Korean media outlet Yonhap, there are rumors circulating that Trump just upped the ante by ordering two more carrier strike groups deployed to the tense region, placing a tremendous amount of air and naval firepower at the disposal of the military’s regional commander.
A roughly translated version of the article, which cites South Korean government officials who claimed knowledge of the deployment orders, stated that in addition to the USS Carl Vinson, already steaming toward Korea from Singapore, the carrier strike groups of the USS Ronald Reagan and USS Nimitz were also ordered to head for the region.
That shouldn’t be too difficult for the Reagan strike group, whose home port is in Japan, but it may take a bit more time for the Nimitz group, as it is reportedly wrapping up final pre-deployment assessments off the coast of Oregon, according to the Nimitz News, the carrier’s in-house media outlet.
To be sure, there is little in the way of confirmation of these reports from the American media, and the Trump administration has made it clear repeatedly that it isn’t going to discuss strategy or asset movements ahead of time, lest it give the enemy a premature heads-up regarding impending operations.
That said, if the rumors of additional carrier strike group deployments to the Korean peninsula are indeed true, the size of the “big stick” Trump is showing Kim Jong Un to deter him from his would-be nuclear ambitions just got a lot bigger and vastly more lethal.
It is worth noting that aside from regular training operations, this is believed to be the first time this many carrier strike groups have been deployed to the same area since World War II, should the deployments in fact take place — a significant policy shift in light of the previous administration’s non-deployment of similar assets over the same time-frame.
THE BOTTON LINE: Reminiscent of the Kennedy – Khrushchev standoff that nearly brought America into a nuclear war with Russia in the Cubin missile crises.  We are now in a nuclear standoff with North Korea.  The difference is the question: Does North Korea have the nuclear capability of launching a nuclear warhead and hit something like South Korea or Japan or even the U.S. West Coast?  Or’ will we wait until they do? Either way, this my friend, is a serious situation.  A sticky wicket, as the Brits would say. 

Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Unborn Babies Feel Pain At Five Weeks Of the First Trimester

“Yes, the time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God a service” (John 16:2).


Unborn Babies Feel Pain At Five Weeks Of the First Trimester


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 23, 2017

  

The picture is of an eight week old unborn human baby.

Logic and Science
One by one the argument for abortion are shot down either logically or scientifically. The argument that says that it’s okay to kill an unborn child because he/she is not fully developed.  Well one doesn’t need to be a scientist to figure out that full development doesn’t occur until one is approaching his or her late twenties, such as the hypoid bone and brain development.  So with that argument - one could be exterminated until age 30 because of the lack of full development.

Another bit of logic is when does human life begin?  The pro-choice group conveniently puts out the argument that life doesn’t begin until birth, thereby justifying late term abortion.  If the unborn child isn’t alive until birth then the only other alternative is that the child or fetus is dead. There is no in between my friend. And if it is not human life beginning at conception then what kind of life is it, a lizard maybe?

Then the Science
Now’ with the discovery that the nervous system develops sooner than previously thought this could have implications for whether babies feel pain in the early weeks.  Although there’s no logical reason why a human lack of capacity to feel pain justifies ending the life of an unborn baby, it’s just another of a plethora of common arguments for why abortion is acceptable in any stage of pregnancy. However, the prevailing wisdom that babies don’t feel pain as early as in the first trimester will now have to be re-examined, as Live Action reports.
Adult-like nerves
A study published in the Journal Cell on 23 March 2017 reveals that the nervous system of embryos and foetuses are greatly more developed than was previously believed. Entitled “Tridimensional Visualization and Analysis of Early Human Development the study shows that unborn babies in the first trimester have “adult-like” patterns of nerves. Researchers “combined whole-mount immunostaining, 3DISCO clearing, and light-sheet imaging to start building a 3D cellular map” and found that “the adult-like pattern of skin innervation is established before the end of the first trimester, showing important intra- and inter-individual variations in nerve branches.”

What evidence is there for foetal pain?
For now, it’s  conclusively provable that preborn babies can feel pain at 20 weeks gestation, although they respond to touch as early as eight weeks. There is also increasing evidence that unborn babies can feel pain much earlier than 20 weeks — likely as early as five weeks.  Some evidence exists to show that foetal pain may be even worse in the first trimester, due to the uneven maturation of foetal neurophysiology.


Roe V Wade has a clause that basically says that if it can ever be proven that life begins at conception, Roe would be nullified.  Guess what?  It has been proven that life begins at conception…

THE BOTTOM LINE: Now if it is decided in a court of law the life begins at conception, which is defined as beginning, start, onset, origin, commencement and formation. Then all the more than 50 million abortions must be considered as murders.  More murders of one’s own people than any other country in history.  And you thought Hitler and Mao were evil.  Abortionists are nothing but a bunch of evil murdering hypocrites. But then as usual don’t take my word for it listen to what a Doctor who performed more than 1200 abortions before he realized the truth of what he was doing.

And then the argument for abortion to save the life of the mother doesn’t hold water either as it takes two to three days to prepare for a late term abortion, not conducive to an emergency to save the mother’s life in that case either labor would be induced to deliver naturally or a Cesarean Section would be performed as the doctor describes in the previous video.

One could easily continue to debunk all the arguments for abortion because none of them can ever be an excuse for ending the life of a little human being. 

Abortion is the irresponsible premeditated murder of an innocent human life. 

Babies are not an inconvenience my friend, they are a blessing.

Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Saturday, April 22, 2017

In America –Communist Atheists Think Only They Have Rights


"I have a right to nothing which another has a right to take away." -- Thomas Jefferson to Uriah Forrest, 1787. Papers, 12:477.

 

In America –Communist Atheists Think Only They Have Rights

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 21, 2017



A public school teacher, while exercising her Constitutional rights, banned her students from wearing a Christian Cross, she called it a “Gang Symbol.”
It’ time to fight back my friend

Apparently one has Constitutional rights in the United States of America as long as one is a member of the Communist Atheist Gang.  The Jesus Gang has no rights, they are band from public school.  My recommendation is’ and always has been, PULL YOUR KIDS OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOL NOW!

We cannot abide the assault on our First Amendment rights of religious freedom by the Communists, because the victims of our apathy will be the loss of our children. While many of us have enjoyed lives lived under the cloak of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, ideals that for most of our lives the Republicans AND the Democrats alike have defended. But today the Democrats of America have been taken over by the Fabian Communists Atheists.  If we don’t fight back now, our children will not know the freedoms that we have known.

What should we fight against?  We should fight against people like this and their destructive satanic elitist ideology.

The Daily Caller has a new story about a teacher from Hillsborough County, Florida who has an interesting and despotic way of teaching her Christian students.

An Atheist High School math teacher Lora Jane Riedas believes, as most Communists do, that she is just a lot more equal than the rest of us. She has found herself on the wrong side of the law after the treatment of her students became known. The lawyers for some of the students are from the constitutional defenders at the Liberty Counsel, and they recently sent a letter to the District School Superintendent explaining the situation.


We write on behalf of parents of children in the classroom of teacher Lora Jane Riedas, a math teacher at Riverview High School, who report that Ms. Riedas has prohibited at least three children from wearing Christian cross necklaces in her classroom, claiming on occasion that they are “gang symbols.” They are not gang symbols, but are symbols of personal faith. A picture of one of the crosses, less than an inch tall, is attached. Subsequent to her cross ban, Ms. Riedas singled out at least one of the students for a number of false “misbehavior” allegations.1 One of our student clients reports that she had just sat down in class, and placed her books on her desk, when Ms. Riedas approached her. Referencing the tiny cross necklace which was around the student’s neck, Ms. Riedas said, “I need you to take your necklace off.” Our client asked “Why?” and Ms. Riedas refused to explain, stating “That’s disrespectful; you have to take it off.” Our client did not want to be disrespectful, so she took it off, but she felt bad because she felt she was being forced to deny her faith. All of our clients are afraid to openly wear their cross necklaces in class any more. Ms. Riedas has further engaged in impermissible LGBT political activism in the classroom, and has indicated her intent to further do so during instructional time. Ms. Riedas is planning to promote GLSEN’s 2 “Day of Silence” coercive political activities during instructional time in her classroom on Friday, April 21, 2017. In addition to being opposed to student religious expression, we understand that Ms. Riedas is the sponsor for the R.G.S.A Gay-Straight Alliance (“GSA”) at Riverview High School, and that her classroom is permanently decorated with LGBT political themes, including a large display on her wall stating “ALLY,” a “Safe Space” poster and door sticker, and assorted other LGBT promotional material, including buttons prominently displayed on her desk, facing students, stating “I Love My LGBT Students” and “PROUD Public Employee.” These buttons make other students feel marginalized and excluded, and not full members of the classroom community. Moreover, at the beginning of the semester, Ms. Riedas placed LGBT rainbow stickers on students’ classroom folders without their consent, which were there one day when the students arrived. One of our clients reports that after she removed the LGBT sticker, Ms. Riedas’ behavior toward her changed markedly for the worse…

The totality of Ms. Riedas’ behavior is very concerning: banning cross necklaces on the one hand, while promoting wholesale LGBT political activism on the other. By retweeting GLSEN’s “guide” for classroom activism, Ms. Riedas is encouraging other teachers to engage in what she herself appears to be preparing to do on Friday, April 21: classroom activism during instructional time, requiring students who do not agree with “Day of Silence” to participate in various forced activities entirely unrelated to math class, and rewarding students who participate in the political activity she herself favors.

In banning cross necklaces from three different students in her classroom, Ms. Riedas has “intentionally violate[d] or den[ied] a student’s legal rights.” The right to wear a cross necklace is clearly established. There is no question that students have the right to wear religious jewelry, despite any specious claim of “gang affiliation” by Ms. Riedas. Subsequent to her cross ban, Ms. Reidas has subjected at least one of the students “to unnecessary embarrassment or disparagement,” in singling the student out for false allegations of student behavior violations. In her numerous promotions of homosexuality in the classroom, including GLSEN’s “guide” she has indicated an intent to “intentionally . . . distort subject matter” which is beyond the scope of classroom instruction. In the cross ban and subsequent harassment, Ms. Riedas has violated the prohibition on harassment or discrimination “against any student on the basis of …religion . . . political beliefs . . . or social and family background.” The same holds true for any of the activities from GLSEN’s “guide” which she plans to foist upon the students, as well as the final prohibition on “exploit[ing] a relationship with a student for personal gain or advantage,” in that she holds a position of power over students, and is using that to push her own politically activist LGBT beliefs upon them…

Parents have the fundamental right to determine the jewelry as well as the associations and activities of their minor children. School officials have no business in intentionally interfering with parent-approved religious jewelry, or in promoting their pet political ideologies during instructional time to a captive audience. The Hillsborough County School District is hereby on notice that any further violations of student rights in this fashion will be viewed by Liberty Counsel as sufficient to support a federal lawsuit for civil rights violations…

Reidas’ behavior is un-American, un-Constitutional and un-acceptable, but unfortunately it is also becoming more and more common in our nation’s public schools. There are a few good teachers toiling in anonymity, working hard trying to educate our children and mold young minds into a creative and intelligent generation. Sadly, those teachers have been overshadowed by the growing thousands  (upon thousands) of teachers, who just like Reidas care more about their own agenda of elitist indoctrination than they do the true education of our children. We cannot allow this to continue my friend.

If you believe that God given rights as endorsed in the declaration - are for everyone and not just those that believe they are just for a self-chosen few, then write your representatives HERE and let them know that Constitutional rights are for all citizens not just the Fabian Communists. Moreover, freedom doesn’t mean that by exorcising ones freedom, one can take someone else’s freedom away.

"No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." -- Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816.

Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.




Friday, April 21, 2017

The Philosophy Of Socialism



“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” President Ronald Reagan

The Philosophy Of Socialism

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 21, 2017



There are those in the United States that are ignorantly, or purposely trying to undermine the free economy of America.  A philosophy that has for more than 250 years, made this country the most well off, for the most people, and the most desired country in the world to live in. And yet the greedy Social Communists, those that believe they are just a lot more equal than the masses, are turning America into just another failed Socialist Tyranny.

If you have been paying attention to the news you will see the ugly face of socialism in Venezuela. It is as if the aforementioned quote of Ronald Reagan is being played out right before our eyes, but should we be surprised? Recall how so many Hollywood Communist elites flocked to Venezuela when the tyrant and socialist dictator Hugo Chavez came to power. Folks like Sean Penn, Oliver Stone, Harry Belafonte, and others celebrated and dreamed of this utopia. However, if these individuals had taken the time to read and study political philosophy they would have realized that socialism is rooted in five basic principles or tenets – 1. Wealth redistribution, 2. Nationalizing of production, 3. Expansion of the welfare state, 4. Social egalitarianism, and 5. Secular humanism. In my estimation, these are principles not to be admired in a sociality, but instead should be feared.
 Hugo Chavez promised to take from a certain class, let’s call them producers, and reallocate to the masses. The problem with that is as Margaret Thatcher expressed, those producers did as suspected, they fled. In South Florida is the suburban city in Broward County called Weston. In the city of Weston, you will see the American flag and another flag very prominently flying…it is the Venezuelan flag. There are those who affectionately call Weston Florida, “Westenzuela”. It is there that the great Venezuelan economic producers and those who did not share the vision of its socialist hell, fled to, and it is a beautiful American city.
Venezuela is without a doubt one of the richest nations in the world because for one - it is blessed with infinite oil resources. Yet, when Mr. Chavez came to power he nationalized those horrible capitalistic private oil companies. Now, those companies and resources have been so poorly managed, that Venezuela is suffering what is possibly the highest rate of inflation in the world. Therefore, the promise of giving everyone the profits from a nationalized oil industry has failed, miserably. To see and read the reports of that Country now having citizens, no, subjects, eating from garbage cans, and stores not having basic necessities is appalling.
But, where are the American Hollywood elites and advocates of socialism now?  You guessed it, back in their Belair mansions in capitalist America.
Hugo Chavez, and now President Nicolas Maduro (funny thing, Maduro used to be a bus driver) championed the principle of social egalitarianism. You know, everyone is equal so everyone should have an equal footing, meaning status. That reminds me of a simple quote, “a free people are not equal and an equal people are not free”. Socialism does not address the philosophy of equality of opportunity, it advances that which is antithetical to individual liberty and sovereignty, the equality of outcomes. Additionally, the outcomes are then determined by people like a Chavez, Maduro, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren and/or the many other programed robots in our government.
Maduro was a bus driver, and just imagine, Bernie Sanders did not truly earn a paycheck until he was almost into his 40s. That fella has done very well in government positions, having a beautiful lake home in Vermont.  Socialism is ripe with hypocrisy as well. Some are just more equal than others.
Churchill had it right in that, “the ugly face of socialism is the gospel of envy”. It creates a fever pitch atmosphere of hatred to a defined group, the 1 percenters. Then should we not all strive to be champions, the best, and exceptional? No, the ugly face of socialism wants to keep us ignorant in order to foster that equal sharing of misery…the result of the equality of outcomes.
 And what happens if the people eventually see the ugly face of socialism and reject it? Well first, it is necessary to disarm the people in order to have complete control over them. Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, and remember Nazi stood for National Socialism, began with disarming the German people and unleashing the feared Brown Shirts (SA).  In Venezuela today, Maduro is arming his own supporters, creating a militia, to gun down the unarmed protesters against his rule and consolidation of power. And where are the voices of the American Hollywood elite, or the Bernie Sanders? I believe this is the reason why the progressive social communists in America are so adamant about gun bans.
There is nothing trendy, cool, or desirable about socialism. And those who advocate it are, well, let me be blunt, lying, deceptive braindead jackasses – the symbol of the Democrat Socialist Party. The ugly face of socialism has destroyed the beauty of Venezuela, turning what could be termed as a little piece of heaven on earth… into turning a little piece earth into hell. And it will also destroy the liberty of a Free America. 
Let us commit that the beauty that is America shall not fall to the ugliness of socialism. For if that happens, where do we go?
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”Sir Winston Churchill
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money.” -British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Another 42 Percent Increase In Crime Despite Gun Ban

"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt." - John P. Curran


Another 42 Percent Increase In Crime Despite Gun Ban

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted April 20, 2017


I have this nagging question:  If there are no guns because of a gun ban, how can the gun homicide rates go up???   I also have this nagging answer:  Because criminals don’t obey the gun bans!

Unfortunately most normally law abiding citizens - do!  
A new report from Scotland Yard reveals that another “significant spike in knife and gun murders” has occurred in the United Kingdom, proving once again that restrictive British gun and knife laws have made that nation less safe.

According to Scotland Yard, there has been a 42 percent increase in “gun violence” and a 24 percent rise in “knife offenses” during the 2016-2017 financial year. Add that to the nearly 400 percent increase in violent crime over the last 25 years of British gun and knife bans and you understandably have literally war in the streets.
You see my friend, there is something basic about law, and that is - Criminals do not obey it…

All the rhetoric we’ve heard over the years about how the British as well as Australians solved their crime problem by having law-abiding citizens turn in their guns, and adopting strict knife and gun control has turned out to be a nightmare of wishful thinking as well as lies to back it up, it is simply the wrong thing to do.

“Like gun control efforts anywhere, the Brits have disarmed the wrong people.” Said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb.  “It is ironic that this news appears now, as America celebrates the 242nd anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord, when American colonists resisted Britain’s attempt to confiscate arms from the militia,” he added. “British gun control then ignited a revolution. Now it is just resulting in a higher violent crime rate.”

Scotland Yard’s report shows something else. In addition to the gun violence increase there were 12,074 knife-related crimes in the 2016-2017 financial year, a 24 percent increase, which demonstrates that criminals will resort to whatever weapon they can get their hands on against a unilaterally-disarmed public.

“British ruffians are no different than criminals in the United States,” Gottlieb observed. “They will take advantage of any weakness they see, whether in law enforcement or the public’s inability to defend against an attack. This is why we fight so hard to protect our nation’s constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and why our friends across the pond should seriously reconsider how their policies have made their citizens more vulnerable to people who routinely ignore the law.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: Personally’ I find it typical of the braindead left deceived by the Fabian Communists.  The very same thing occurred in Washington D.C. until the Heller decision by the Supreme Court making the gun ban there illegal, the violent crime rate dropped by 63 percent.  Chicago is another example of taking guns away from the good guys and giving them to the bad guys.  The crime rate has increased by 47 percent. The citizens of Great Britain are not only subject to the street criminals but are also at the mercy of the Muslim Jihadist that now completely control large neighborhoods in a around London. The police will not even go there.  The same will occur here in the U.S. within the next 20 years.

Thanks for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.