®™©
UNESCO
Votes on Whether the Temple Mount is Jewish or Palestinian
Opinion Editorialist for
If that’s not enough my intellectual friend, at the
time of the renaming of Israel to Palestine, there was’ no Jerusalem, no Temple.
It had been completely destroyed by the
Romans with the exception of King Harrods Antonia
Fortress which today is the site of the Mosque ‘The Rock of the Dome’
and the Al-Aqsa, mistakenly claimed as the
site of David’s temple built by Solomon. The destruction of the temple fulfilling a
prophecy by Yahushua (Jesus) in Mathew 24:2 “Do you see all these things?" he asked. [Referring to Temple in the
city of David] "Truly I tell you,
not one stone here will be left on another; everyone will be
thrown down."
And
approximately 70 years later Jerusalem was destroyed, by the Romans and the
temple was… guess what? “Thrown down”
as Yahushua said- from the city of David into the Valley of the Cheese Mongers
and covered over with the debris from mount Zion which was the same historical
Mount Mariah of Abraham and Isaac born in about 1700 BC and the father of the
Jewish Nation.
Now as a side note, you might think that
Abraham was also the father of Ishmael as the Muslims like to expound. The truth is that Ishmael was the son of
Abram not Abraham. While they may be
physically the same man, his name was changed by God and he became a different
person. So Abram the father of Ishmael, the father of the Arab nation with no inheritance, was
purposely a different person than Abraham the father of Isaac, the father of
the Jewish nation.
Then in order to completely wipeout
any trace of Israel’s existence, the Romans in 70 AD, renamed Israel -Palestine.
Though
the definite origins of the ‘word’ "Palestine"
have
been debated for years, the name is believed by most historians to be
derived from the Egyptian and Hebrew word peleshet. Roughly translated to mean
"rolling" or "migratory,” maybe Bedouins. Some historians say
the term was used to describe the inhabitants of the land to the northeast of
Egypt - the
Historically the original country of Israel reached far
into the country now known as Jorden. As shown on the map. The tribe of Gad
Reuben and part of Manasseh reached well across the Jordan River, as well as to
north all the way to the southern parts of Turkey.
The second king, David, first made Jerusalem the nation's
capital. Taking it from the Jebusites. Although eventually Israel was split into two
separate kingdoms, Israel in the north and Judah in the south, Jewish
occupation there lasted off and on between wars and captivity for more than a
thousand years. Even after the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem and the
beginning of the exile.
Jewish life in the Roman renamed country called Palestine,
continued and often flourished. Large Jewish communities were reestablished in
Jerusalem and Tiberius by the ninth century. In the 11th century, Jewish
communities grew in Rafah, Gaza, Ashkelon, Jaffa and Caesarea.
Israel’s Foreign
Ministry is currently laboring to convince nations to vote down the motion,
calling it “another malicious and dishonest attempt to harm Israel’s affinity with
its capital.”
“How full of awe is this place! This is none other than the house
of God, and this is the gate of heaven.” Genesis
28:17 (The Israel Bible™)
UNESCO
Votes on Whether the Temple Mount is Jewish or Palestinian
This
is the most absurd ignorant issue in all of world history.
By
de Andréa,
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’
The criminals in the United
Nations, are once more set to question the historical connection of the Temple
Mount, and the Jewish people of Israel, with a vote on a resolution which would
despotically repudiate any link between the two.
I really don’t know
how much more ignorant the U.N. and those in Western governments can get about
ancient history. But the very fact that
so-called intelligent people with degrees from universities with ivy growing
all over them, know absolutely nothing about ancient history is astounding.
I will try to write
this very slow because I know that with all those degrees hanging all over their
walls, they can’t read fast. The very
fact that the Palestinians are a recognized people by so-called intellectuals,
tells me that they are nothing but a bunch of lazy ignoramuses. Rather than to take the time to read their
history books to find out the truth, they allow themselves to be deceived by a
bunch of demonic conquesting barbaric ideologists that make up their history as
they go along and can’t seem to progress beyond the seventh century AD.
Once again I will
attempt to educate you bunch of brainwashed robots with the truth, yeah, you
probably don’t even know what that means anymore. But hear goes once again, so
please bear with me.
So,
you and the so-called Palestinians believe that they have a claim of HISTORICAL
ownership of Jerusalem! I for one, can’t help but wonder just what
part of history was the so-called Palestinians claim to have had any rightful
possession of Jerusalem or in Israel, Judah or anyplace in the world for that
matter.
The
truth is, that if there are any such historical people called Palestinian, they
could not in
fact ever have been in possession of historical Jerusalem or Israel.
First…
(And I will write this
slowly and highlight it
so you can
read it) Israel, was arbitrarily and fictitious ly renamed from Israel to Palestine by the Roman Empire shortly after 70 AD. Shall I repeat that? No! You just read that over again and again and
let that sink in for a while…..And if anyone….that’s anyone of you boneheaded
Ivy League Collage boys want to challenge me on that I would be glad to debate
the issue anywhere anytime an let you try to prove otherwise.
Note: Islam or Muslims did
not exist until 610 AD more than 500 years later. Moreover there were never, and there is not now,
any historical people called Palestinian’s, with a recognized Palestinian
government, speaking Palestinian with any kind of history or heritage other
than ARAB. Even the Jews living in
the Palestine area were called Arab Jews.
Not Palestinians. Even the name Palestine, means wandering people.
The
two existing Muslim buildings on the so-called Temple Mount, were not erected
until
the late seventh century AD, more than 2000 years after the first Jews
occupied the land known as Canaan which eventually became Israel.
But then I am just
repeating what every known historical document says. I’m just saying!
A little history:
King Nebuchadnezzar of
Babylon destroyed Jerusalem and the First Temple of David, (built by his son Solomon)
in approximately 935 BC. The Jews were
then taken captive to Babylon and the city had no center of worship until
Zerubbabel and the returning exiles built the Second Temple, completing it in
516 BC. The Second Temple, modest in
comparison with its predecessor, was later rebuilt and enlarged by Herod the
Great beginning in 20 BC. Jesus was dedicated in the Second rebuilt Temple of
Harod, He cast out money changers there on two occasions, and He taught
frequently in the courts of the temple. The
second temple of Harod was destroyed by the Roman general Titus in 70 AD
If that’s not enough my intellectual friend, at the
time of the renaming of Israel to Palestine, there was’ no Jerusalem, no Temple.
It had been completely destroyed by the
Romans with the exception of King Harrods Antonia
Fortress which today is the site of the Mosque ‘The Rock of the Dome’
and the Al-Aqsa, mistakenly claimed as the
site of David’s temple built by Solomon. The destruction of the temple fulfilling a
prophecy by Yahushua (Jesus) in Mathew 24:2 “Do you see all these things?" he asked. [Referring to Temple in the
city of David] "Truly I tell you,
not one stone here will be left on another; everyone will be
thrown down."
And
approximately 70 years later Jerusalem was destroyed, by the Romans and the
temple was… guess what? “Thrown down”
as Yahushua said- from the city of David into the Valley of the Cheese Mongers
and covered over with the debris from mount Zion which was the same historical
Mount Mariah of Abraham and Isaac born in about 1700 BC and the father of the
Jewish Nation.
Now as a side note, you might think that
Abraham was also the father of Ishmael as the Muslims like to expound. The truth is that Ishmael was the son of
Abram not Abraham. While they may be
physically the same man, his name was changed by God and he became a different
person. So Abram the father of Ishmael, the father of the Arab nation with no inheritance, was
purposely a different person than Abraham the father of Isaac, the father of
the Jewish nation.
Personally I don’t think the Jews will ever find any proof
that the area known as the Dome of the Rock is the Jewish Temple Mount, because
it was likely the Herodian
fort known as the Fort of Antonia. All the stones in the wall, part of which is
called the Wailing Wall, surrounding the rock are Herodian, from the construction
of the Fort of Antonia. Harod lived from
74 BC to 4 BC, making it impossible to have been the site of the first Temple built
by Solomon in approximately 935 BC, about 861 years before the walls of the so-called
Temple Mount were even built by Harod. Both Temples were actually located in
the original City of David, that King David took from the Jebusites. Which was
completely destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD which was prophesied by
Christ.
But then, that is
just my reasonable logical opinion.
Then in order to completely wipeout
any trace of Israel’s existence, the Romans in 70 AD, renamed Israel -Palestine.
Though
the definite origins of the ‘word’ "Palestine"
have
been debated for years, the name is believed by most historians to be
derived from the Egyptian and Hebrew word peleshet. Roughly translated to mean
"rolling" or "migratory,” maybe Bedouins. Some historians say
the term was used to describe the inhabitants of the land to the northeast of
Egypt - the
Philistines who lived in the coastal area now known as Gaza
during the time that the Jews historically occupied Israel. The Philistines
called the sea people were an Aegean people from Crete - closely related to the
Greeks and with no connection ethnically, linguistically or historically with
Arabia, and they never occupied Jerusalem or the mainland of Israel. The Twelve Tribes of Israel formed the first
constitutional monarchy in the land of Canaan about 1000 B.C. 1600 years before
Mohammad and Islam ever existed.
Historically the original country of Israel reached far
into the country now known as Jorden. As shown on the map. The tribe of Gad
Reuben and part of Manasseh reached well across the Jordan River, as well as to
north all the way to the southern parts of Turkey.
The second king, David, first made Jerusalem the nation's
capital. Taking it from the Jebusites. Although eventually Israel was split into two
separate kingdoms, Israel in the north and Judah in the south, Jewish
occupation there lasted off and on between wars and captivity for more than a
thousand years. Even after the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem and the
beginning of the exile.
Jewish life in the Roman renamed country called Palestine,
continued and often flourished. Large Jewish communities were reestablished in
Jerusalem and Tiberius by the ninth century. In the 11th century, Jewish
communities grew in Rafah, Gaza, Ashkelon, Jaffa and Caesarea.
So
historically, Jewish people have, to one degree or another, continuously
occupied the area of Canaan/Israel/Palestine, since 1000 BC to date, for approximately
3000 years.
And
now I will ask you apathetic educated boneheads with Ivy growing in your brains…
where in history do the so-called nonexistent Palestinians (which are in
reality Hamas terrorists deported out of Jordan in the earlyto mid 1960’s),
have a legitimate claim to the possession of Israel and/or Jerusalem?
Answer…NO WHERE! None! Nada!
Moreover,
where in history do the Jews first occupy the land today known as Israel,
including the area of Jerusalem?
Answer…from approximately
1000 BC. For 3000 YEARS, my low information
friends.
Nevertheless the so-called UN’s
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) will vote on the
draft decision during its 40th annual meeting, which is being held in Istanbul,
Turkey, the throne of the old Muslim Ottoman Empire. It is the second such
anti-Semitic decision in months, following an April resolution in which UNESCO attempted to
erase Israel’s ties to its ancient heritage sites, the Temple Mount and the
Western Wall.
The Temple Mount is
considered the holiest place in the Jewish religion. It is claimed to be the
site of two ancient Jewish Temples. The purchase of the site by King David and the
building of the Temples are recorded in the Bible. However, today the Temple
Mount is claimed by Arabs, whose work to delegitimize Jewish ties to the site, just as they have historically done all over
the world, has ignorantly or hatefully gained much ground on the
international stage, as evidenced by the adoption of the April resolution.
The new UN draft, a
joint Palestinian-Jordanian effort, calls for a return to the modern “historic
status quo” which existed before the 1967 war. Presumably, this means
completely banning Jews and other non-Muslims from the entire Temple Mount
complex.
Today, while
non-Muslims are allowed to visit the site during certain restricted hours and
under careful monitoring, they are not permitted to pray. Muslim claims that
Israel is currently attempting to change the status quo following an increase
in the number of Jewish visitors to the Temple Mount are behind the surge of
terror attacks and violence which has plagued Israel for months and taken the
lives of 40 Israelis and other victims.
The UN document
repeatedly and ignorantly refers to Israel as the “occupying power” and accuses
it of causing damage to the site, carrying out illegal excavations and
preventing the Jordanian Waqf, which has jurisdiction over the Temple Mount,
from making repairs and renovations.
According to the
resolution, Israel is guilty of “intrusive constructions, tunneling and
underground excavations” and “aggressions against Islamic religious sites
and prayer places.”
When in fact, the
Waqf’s own “Additions and repairs” on the site are themselves illegal and risk
causing serious damage to valuable ancient artifacts and structures. A recent
attempt on the Waqf’s part to carry out illegal construction on the Temple Mount was met with
an injunction from the Israeli government to immediately halt the project. The Muslims want to prevent the possibility
that the Israelis will find archeological proof that this is the very site of
the temple of King David built by his son Solomon.
The U.N. draft refers
to the Western Herodian Wall Plaza in quotes and, like its April predecessor,
calls the Wailing Wall the holy site of Jewish worship, a Muslim site called
“Al-Buraq Plaza”.
While the Temple
Mount is home to the Dome of the Rock which wasn’t built until 691 AD, 1600
years after Israel became a nation, the Western Herodian Wall, has absolutely
no Muslim connection except that it is claimed the Muhammad one tied his horse there.
Again it was built by King Harod the
Great long before Islam existed.
Carmel Shama Hacohen,
Israel’s ambassador to UNESCO, also slammed the resolution, saying that the
international condemnation following the April decision had clearly not been
enough to stop the Palestinian agenda from moving forward in the UN. Carmel Shama Hacohen, Israel’s UNESCO ambassador.
“Anyone who thought that after the criticism
voiced by Israeli and international Jewry against this decision and the
recanting of the heads of state and foreign ministers around the world
following the last decision that Palestinians would come to their senses, need
to come to their senses and internalize this complicated reality,” he said.
“We have made a concerted
diplomatic [effort] but the voting will be conducted by a secret ballot and the
rules of the game are well known: Palestinians almost always have a majority.”
Hacohen was referring
to an outpouring of protests following the April vote, with both Jewish and
Christian leaders speaking out against the decision. Christian representative to the UN Laurie Cardoza-Moore said the
UN’s repudiation of the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount was akin to the Holocaust
denial.
The motion was heavily condemned by Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu calling it “absurd”.
“UNESCO ignores the unique
historic connection of Judaism to the Temple Mount, where the two temples stood
for a thousand years and to which every Jew in the world has prayed for
thousands of years,” he said at the time.
France and Brazil,
who had both voted in favor of the resolution, backtracked on their original decisions,
saying they had made a mistake in helping to pass it.
The April resolution
referred to the Western Wall as the Palestinian “Al-Buraq Plaza” and
condemned “Israeli aggression on the Temple Mount”, which it called a “Muslim
holy site of worship”.
THE BOTTOM LINE: All of
the West including Israel is at fault for ever allowing the recognition of a nonexistent
nation and ethic people. This should, but it won’t be, a lesson as to
what Islam is and what it does. The
whole Islamic ideology of conquest is a lie. Their history is a lie. And this should be proof that the West has
been willfully and ignorantly deceived and as a result is enabling their own
demise.
Whether
the so-called Temple Mount is actually the original site of David and Solomon’s
first Temple as well as the second temple or not, is irrelevant, it is a Jewish
matter, and certainly not a matter for a bunch deported Muslim terrorist
jihadists from Jorden.
The
second Temple was even built around 516 BC nearly 1000 years before Islam
existed, wake up people….
It
is a mystery to me why Israel doesn’t just round up all the unassimilated
Muslims in Israel proper, bring them to Gaza and tell them the first time they
are a threat to Israel they will carpet bomb the entire Gaza Strip into the
next millennium and be done with it.
After all, that is exactly what they and all the rest of Islam has
threatened to do to Israel. I would try
to sell the idea as a defensive preemptive strike. And if no allied countries support them, then
do it unilaterally. This is the same
thing the rest of the West needs to do in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya and
anyplace where Muslims are raging Jihad.
Yes
Genocide, ‘until they stop their bloody Jihad’… But then again that is just my
opinion.
Thanks
for listening.
-
de Andréa
Please pass this article
on to everyone on your email list. It
may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment