Thursday, May 23, 2019

President Trump Is Involved In A Cover-up???

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


President Trump Is Involved In A Cover-up???


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for    

Posted May 23, 2019

If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment on this or other articles, you can email me at

Where will this end? It’s getting juicy, the SwanpRates are beginning to run wild and eat each other.

Speaker Pelosi ratchets up her false accusations and now says: “Trump has committed 'impeachable offenses' in 'plain sight”, (whatever that means), she says Trump is involved in a 'cover-up'


The truth is that Nancy Pelosi is involved in yet another ‘frame-up’. I’m accusing her’ of obstructing the President of the United States. Wait until Attorney General Barr gets through with the DeepState SwampRats. Just you wait Henry Higgins Just you wait”!!!

Former White House press secretary Sean Spicer says that “Democrats have invested everything they have in trying to undermine President Trump.”

The ‘Rats’ are going to lose big time…The exterminator is coming! 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told a Communist audience on Wednesday that President Trump may have committed “an impeachable offense, calls from an out of control rank-and-file are to press forward on impeachment now.

Pelosi, Communist Democrat from-Calif., speaking at the Center for American Progress 2019 Ideas Conference in Washington, D.C., outlined a potential path to impeachment -- moments after a contentious meeting at the White House ended with Trump departing for the Rose Garden to publicly accuse Democrats of another attempted presidential "takedown."

“The fact is, in plain sight, in the public domain, this president is obstructing justice and he's engaged in a cover-up. And that could be an impeachable offense,” Pelosi told the audience, which broke out in applause.

“Ignoring the subpoenas of Congress was Article 3 of the Nixon Impeachment. So, it’s not just the substance that we are after, that we want to have to get the truth to the American people, but in striving to get that the intervention, the obstruction that the administration is engaged in is, as they say, the cover-up is frequently worse than the crime.”

Pelosi scrambles to tamp down trump impeachment frenzy in caucus

Pelosi, who violated Article 4 section 4 clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which reads: “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;” when she refused to protect the American people from an invasion at our border, she also said that Republicans and the president are not committed to protecting the Constitution. WHAT? Isn’t that the pot calling the…well! And did you notice that the Constitution also says that we are guaranteed a republican form of government? And that doesn’t mean a Communist Democracy my friend. .

And would you believe Nan went on to say: “Let me just say, we take on oath of office, to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure the President of the United States does."

That coming from someone that I doubt has ever read the U.S. Constitution, much less has any respect for it or what America stands for. Then she has the brass to say “I am praying for America and for President Trump.” I can’t help wondering which demon she prays to.

Angry dem’s say Trump is 'raping the country,' as impeachment push reaches critical mass
Pelosi has maintained her position that Democrats should not begin impeachment proceedings against Trump, but has faced pressure from members inside her caucus to reverse course -- especially after former White House Counsel Don McGahn was given presidential immunity earlier this week.  Trump is just sick of this continuous attempt at a phony political Coup and frame-up to try to get him out of office. And frankly so am I, moreover I hope I speak for the rest of America, at least in that respect.
House judiciary chairman Nadler said “Trump is making it 'more difficult' not to consider impeachment. You are dealing with a lawless president who is willing to go to any lengths to prevent testimony that does implicate him," Nadler said. Well it is pretty obvious that Comrade Nadler doesn’t know the law either. What in the world is he even doing on the House Judiciary Committee?
 “We do believe it is important to follow the facts,” Pelosi said. “We believe that no one is above the law, including the president of the United States. And we believe that the president of the United States is engaged in a cover-up—a cover-up. And that was the nature of the meeting.”

Hey Nan! It doesn’t make a bit of difference what you believe in, whether it be the tooth fairy or astrology or global warming.  Where is the evidence of a Presidential cover-up Nancy?

But tensions between Democrat leadership and Trump continued to build. Shortly after that meeting, Trump walked out of a meeting with Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer meant to discuss an infrastructure plan. Trump complained about Pelosi's phony “cover-up" charge and demanded Democrats end their "phony investigations."

"What they’ve done is abuse," Trump said.

It’s amazing just to take a look at what Trump has been able to accomplish in spite of having to swim up the Democrat Communist waterfall. It reminds me of the situation that President Reagan was in having to take everything to the people, because the Democrat Congress would throw up road blocks at everything he tried to do for the Country.  

THE BOTTOM LINE: In the tradition of Karl Marx the Democrat agenda is to try to dehumanize those they wish to dominate and destroy.

An example of Democrat racism - First they demonized blacks as slaves, then blacks as equal Americans, then blacks as voters. Then blacks gained a voice and Democrats decided they could use the black votes so they introduced Communist socialist programs to try to control blacks, by destroying the black family and keep them dependent on the social programs.

And they dehumanized babies just to justify killing them up to and including the point of birth, (They are just a piece of unwanted tissue) and then they demonize anyone that disagrees with their rabid hate and insanity.

This type of behavior is right out of Karl Marx my friend. And your children and grandchildren are going to blame ‘you’ for allowing America to become a Totalitarian State.

The question is: What are ‘you’ going to do about it…?

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your family and or friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Police In Maryland Kill 60yr Old Man For Resisting Illegal Gun Confiscation

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Police In Maryland Kill 60yr Old Man For Resisting Illegal Gun Confiscation


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for    

Posted May 22, 2019


If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment on this or other articles, you can email me at

Tyranny has arrived in America my friend, just as I said it would.

The DeepState SwampRat Communists have found a way to ram through true, Nazi-style gun confiscation and you need to know what to do…

few months ago, two Maryland police officers were acting under orders to confiscate guns from a 60yr old man under their "red flag" law that took effect last year.

This law allows ‘anyone’ to file an anonymous court order (behind your back) to have your legal guns confiscated illegally.

Reports on how exactly this old man "resisted" the gun confiscation differ, but one thing is clear...
A 60yr old man answered his door to loud persistent banging at 5:17am. The sun hadn’t even begun to come up yet, so he was naturally frightened. The police told him - they were there to take his guns because an anonymous person filed a "red flag" court order against him.

And now the 60 year old innocent law abiding American is dead. They killed him inside his own home.

This is a violation of so many laws, One of them is the The Fourth Constitutional Amendment:  The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

But then as I have said before: “Constitutional law only applies in a Constitutional Republic, where ‘We The People’ are all ruled by the same law. But we my friend, have apathetically allowed our government to evolve into a Democracy where we are ruled by the majority in government. The law has become irrelevant. Moreover, we will continue to evolve until we are governed not by a Democrat but by an Autocrat.

Keep in mind, with these "red flag" laws as in any autocracy you are guilty of everything until proven innocent of anything...

Stalin once said: “Show me the man, and then I’ll show you the crime.”

With these Red Flag Laws, there are no warrants. No arrest. And you’re not charged with any crimes because no crime has been committed. In fact, you don't even have to commit a crime…this is just as in Germany in the 1930’s, the jack booted storm troopers of the SS forced their why in and just took your arms or anything else they wanted, such as in this case, ‘your life’. Under the new Red Flag Laws, the police have the authority to confiscate your guns... and if you resist you will be killed like the elderly man in Maryland.

Eleven states have already enacted red flag laws and it's speeding up with D.C. and 29 other states trying to pass them right now as I write this article...

Even if you think you've never done anything wrong, just being pro-gun, belonging to the NRA or exercising your constitutional rights could put you on the "red flag" gun confiscation list...
Washington State.

Seattle police confiscated another man’s guns without a warrant and without pressing charges. In fact, he broke no laws...but he stared at people!

All it took was his neighbors, who complained that because he open-carried his handgun (which is completely legal in Washington state) it made them feel “uncomfortable” and “unsafe.” Actually they were likely more safe because’ he was armed.

In short, as in any tyranny, you’re guilty until proven innocent and the police can seize your guns immediately… Kind’a like - shoot you first and ask questions later!

This is the new gun confiscation scheme that Democrat anti-constitutional hate America Communists want for EVERY state in America. Are you ready for this??? Well you had better get’ ready…or fight it, one of the two.

Now that anti-gun Democrat Socialist tyrants have reclaimed the House…One thing is clear my friend…They ARE coming to take your guns.

Democrats Plan To Pursue Most Aggressive Gun-Control Legislation In Decades”The Wall Street Journal

You see, because the Socialism that the anti-American Democrat Communists want to introduce in American doesn’t work, it has never worked in all of history, it must be forced. And that can’t be done in a ‘Free Armed State’, so you must be disarmed.

Passing more “Red Flag” laws in every state…Pushing for a new “Assault Weapons Ban”…Flat out banning America’s most popular rifle, the AR-15, and they lie when thy say it was only made for the military. The AR-15 is a 5.56mm or 22 caliber civilian sport rifle and has never been used in military combat.

It’s all on the table. So, what can you do?

Your best option is to acquire as many of your guns “off the books” as you can…you want as many of your guns “unregistered” as possible, then hide them

Then, even if they come to confiscate your guns, you’ll still have one or two that nobody knows about so you and your family are not left to be defenseless victims of tyranny like the Venezuelans.
If you are worried about the legality or moral legitimacy of having so-called illegal guns…well in the Constitutional Republic of America it is your right to be armed. There is no such gun as an illegal gun. But there is such a law as an illegal law. So you have to decide whether you live in a Constitutional Republic or a Democracy.  Thomas Jefferson said of a Democracy, “[A] Democracy is the ability of a people to elect their own tyrant.”

Here is an official opinion written by - John Jay, the First Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court of the Republic of America.  “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.”

And here is what the U.S. Constitutional law says: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

But the DeepState SwampRat Democrat Communists don’t recognize the Free Republic of America nor do they recognize the Constitution.

So, just as Sheriff Steve Reams of Weld County Colorado said the State can go suck an egg. I say the DeepState Communist Rats can write all the phony illegal laws they want, but until the Second Amendment is abolished according to law and ratified by 2/3rds of the States, it is your God given right to keep and bear arms. If you chose to give up all your rights …well that’s your choice. What I don’t understand is why then you wouldn’t want to move to a place like North Korea or Cuba or Venezuela, the Venezuelans gave up their guns 7 years ago, now look at what has happened.  

As a matter of fact this is exactly why the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights.  Read it…” [it is] necessary to the security of a free State…” Without it we lose our freedom, and all our rights, just as all countries in history that have been disarmed. And finally [it] “shall not be infringed” This means a law contrary to the Second Amendment is an illegal law.

Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams in Colorado made news Monday over his willingness to go to jail over his refusal to enforce what will soon be the state’s new illegal “Red Flag” law.

Given how the news media plays these laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders, as being so sensible, Sheriff Reams looks like a kooky right-winger. After all, who could be against taking away guns from people who are a danger to themselves or others?

But the unconstitutional laws are more complicated than usually discussed in the Communist News Network (CNN). Depending upon the state, anyone from a family member, intimate partner, ex, house or apartment mates, or police, or just someone that hates America or the constitution, or you, can file a complaint. Under Colorado’s proposed law, anyone can make a phone call to the police. They don’t even have to be living in the state. There is no hearing. All the judge has before them is the statement of concern.

As in the Tom Cruise movie, “Minority Report,” all you have to do is figure out who is going to commit a crime. At least the “Pre Crime” division in the movie had the help of psychics.

Fourteen states have now adopted these laws. Nine states adopted these laws last year after Parkland. Colorado will be the second state this year to adopt the law. Constitutional haters like Sen’s. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat Communist, and Marco Rubio, Florida RINO, have similar laws that they are pushing in the Congress.

In the first nine months after Florida passed its Red Flag law last year, judges granted more than 1,000 confiscation orders. In the three months after Maryland’s law went into effect on Oct. 1, more than 300 people had their guns taken away. Connecticut and Indiana have had these laws in effect for the longest time and have seen large increases in confiscation orders as time has gone by. But guess what? No decrease in crime stats. Because as I said crime or safety is not the issue. Power and control is the objective.

Little certainty is needed. Some states allow initial confiscations on just a “suspicion,” which is little more than a guess or a hunch. These standards allow a judge to take away a person’s right to self-defense when there is significantly less than 30 percent chance of something bad happening.

Now even misdemeanor violations can cost you your right to own a gun no longer does it have to be a felon. Also gun control advocates are pushing to take firearms away from people arrested but not even convicted of crimes. Their unwillingness to make that explicit, indicates that they are afraid that courts would strike down such laws.

It has always been possible to take away someone’s guns, but all 50 states have required testimony by a mental health expert before a judge. Hearings could be conducted very quickly in urgent cases, but gun control advocates argue that it’s important to not even alert the person that his guns may be taken away. Hence, the 5 a.m. jack boot SS police raids.

When people really pose a clear danger to themselves or others, they should be confined to a mental health facility. Simply denying them the right to legally buy or own a gun isn’t a remedy. If you think that you are any more likely to stop criminals from getting guns than illegal drugs, good luck. The same drug dealers sell both,  and are a major source of guns. And there are other weapons such as assault cars and assault knives and assault rocks. Should the government outlaw those as well?

Guns are not the only way for mentally unstable people to commit murder or suicide. There are many substitutes that are as effective. Very effective poisons such as cyanide are easily available.

Despite the sacrifices, the evidence shows no benefits from these laws. Looking at data from 1970 through 2017, Red Flag laws appear to have had no effect on reducing murder, suicide, the number of people killed in mass public shootings, robbery, aggravated assault or burglary. There is some evidence that rape rates actually rise. These laws apparently do not save lives. Because they are not meant to save lives. They are meant to disarm the citizens.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If the SwampRats really wanted to stop mass public school shootings. They would arm teachers or have armed guards at every school, it works every time. But as I said, safety isn’t the issue it’s the excuse for disarming the law abiding public. We haven’t previously punished people because we have little more than a hunch, without any specific rules, that they might be a danger. Sheriff Steve Reams knows that the low standards mean that there are going to be a lot of mistakes. Stopping “future crimes” didn’t work in the movies, and they aren’t working in real life.

Read what the Framers of our original Republic had to say:

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." Thomas Jefferson

"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." -- Thomas Paine

As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights. Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions." -- James Madison, National Gazzette, 1792

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first."-- Thomas Jefferson

Our Congress has alreadybecome the legalized version of the first.“
‘As my Daddy use to say, speaking of rights: “Use it’, or you’ll ‘lose it’…”

And finally. if you are still concerned about the moral application of what I suggested, read what JESUS CHRIST said about being armed when His disciples were threatened by the Romans:  And He said to them, But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no ‘sword’ is to sell his coat and ‘buy one.Jesus Christ in Luke 22:36

Need I say more?

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your family and or friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Are No Go Zones In America A Precursor To Civil War?

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Are No Go Zones In America A Precursor To Civil War?

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for    

Posted April 21, 2019

If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment on this or other articles, you can email me at


You are going to think, that if this article is true, then why haven’t I heard about it. Well my friend, unless you spend 16 hours a day writing and doing research as I do, then you have never heard the truth about much of anything. You certainly aren’t going hear it from the Alphabet Soup News. But some in the wayward media may just be starting to develop an interest.

Americans must wake up  Not only are there anti-American Muslim ‘Sharia No-Go
Zones’ here in the United States but also Muslim military training camps getting ready for a future Civil War against the infidels in the United States. This my friend, is why Muslims come here! Oh I know you thought it was just for the cheese.

 I have [Videos]

The incident that occurred at Charlie Hebdo headquarters in Paris, France, was tragic news. However, it was also eye opening when it came to Islam’s presence in the European Union (EU). One fact that many people were suddenly enlightened on due to the Islamic terrorist attacks were the presence of Muslim no-go zones in which French citizens, police, and even the French military dared not go.

Now they have taken over the Charles de Gaulle Air Port in Paris France, France does not belong to the French, it now belongs to the Ummah, (the world nation of Islam).

However, the EU wasn’t, and isn’t, the only area where Muslims are incrementally taking over the country with no-go zones. According to investigative news sources, at Fox News, Muslims have no-go zones established all over the United States. They are reportedly training thousands of Muslims in these areas to get ready for Jihad, something that should be considered a threat to the U.S. But the SwampRats in our Congress are too busy fighting among themselves to do their constitutional job of protecting this country.

We may be beginning to wake up. But is it already too late?

Before I continue to the actual report, as I said, it should be noted that even some mainstream news outlets are now just beginning to run stories on the fear that the U.S. and Canada may actually be enabling homegrown terrorists. Oh Really?

PBS and ABC News have somewhat covered the situation, both stating that the threat of home grown terrorist are real. Even some independent thinking members of Congress have made it clear that the question is not - if the U.S. will suffer another terrorist attack, but when.

Yet, the authority figure exposing Muslim no-go zones, Terrorists Training Camps and homegrown terrorism in America, is not actually the government or even the media, but instead it’s the president of the Christian Action Network, Martin Mawyer.

Over the years, Mawyer’s organization has been so strong in its opposition to Muslim expansion in the U.S., that he’s been targeted in a $30 million defamation lawsuit by Muslims of the Americas (MOA), which is an IRS tax free charitable organization and also a known terrorist supporting group founded by Islamic Pakistani jihadist Sheik Mubarak Ali Gilani. The MOA claims they were damaged by the publication of the Christian Action Network’s book, Twilight in America: The Untold Story of Islamist Terrorist Training Camps Inside America. For example, the novel accuses MOA of acting as a front for Jihadi Islamist terror group Jamaat al-Fuqra. Of course, any time one exposes the truth about Islam one gets into trouble. There is no truth or free speech in Islam.

Read more on the MOA Jamaat al-Fuqra training camps.

Martin Mawyer made an appearance on Fox News to discuss how Muslim enclaves spread across America are breeding terrorists for homegrown jihad. Watch a video of Mawyer’s guest appearance on the FOX News Channel

The shocking video shows Muslim no-go zones in nine different states: Alaska, California, New York, Texas, Michigan, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee but today there are actually three more states, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts.
That means that Americans are forbidden to enter these communities, which are ruled by Shariah law.

These terrorist Islamic communities are spreading across America as I write this article, and it is only a matter of time before there is more bloodshed. Muslims are a danger to America!! They are brainwashing our children, hijacking our courts and using our constitution against us. This must stop!! Thank God for President Trump!!

Wake-up America! Take a look at what’s going on around you, and see what Obama left behind when he left office. The fact remains that Islam continues its aggressive expansion across the globe and it threatens our country too. We should not have to be afraid in our own country!

This is America, only our’ laws should be enforced. Muslims need to be deported if they are not going to follow them. Something President Trump tried to do but was stopped by the hate America ignorant courts.

The fact is, Islam is not a religion at all and therefore not’ protected by the First Amendment. It is in fact a political ideological movement not unlike Nazism and should be treated as such. This is what happens when you let a Muslim in as president. Obama was the WORST excuse for a president in American history. He destabilized the Middle East and North Africa and nearly destroyed our country by helping to promote Islam all he could.

The question is - what would happen if we’ declared America a “NO-GO” Zones to keep Muslims out?? And that’s what we should do!!
If they want their Shariah Law, then we need to run them all back from where they came… before it is too late! Muslims do not assimilate into their host countries culture, they force you to assimilate into theirs.


The following is taken from an article by, titled - No Go Zones: A Guide to Western Failed States and European Secessionist Movements.

What Is a No Go Zone?

A No Go Zone is sort of a failed state in miniature form, and is not that recent of a development. In the strictest sense, a No Go Zone (or “No Go Area”) is an area that has been barricaded off by military or paramilitary authorities. However, a broader definition has emerged in recent years as governments such as France and Sweden use euphemisms such as “vulnerable area,” “exposed area” or “sensitive urban zone” for what are effectively No Go Zones.
For our purposes, a No Go Zone is anywhere that the government is incapable of providing basic support services – policing, firefighting and emergency medical services. This is also the common meaning when “No Go Zone” is used in the media.
Uncomfortable for some to consider, it is an undeniable fact that most, if not all, of the No Go Zones in Europe coincide with large Muslim populations. In these areas, large radicalized immigrant populations are indifferent or hostile to the central government.
Beyond the merely uncomfortable for some and into the deeply disturbing for all, second-generation Muslim immigrants tend to be more radicalized than their parents, not less. This is true across Europe. Second-generation Muslim immigrants have been behind nearly every terrorist attack in Europe post-9/11. The kind of assimilation America saw after its massive immigration wave between the Civil War and the First World War simply is not happening with Muslim immigrant communities in Europe.

No Go Zones in Europe

Much of the debate around whether or not Europe has “No Go Zones” comes down to how terms are defined. A 2017 article on RT’s website put the matter very succinctly: “Thus those looking to dismiss no-go areas as a ‘myth,’ can argue the semantics of what constitutes a ‘no-go zone,’ or how much of a threat they present, but not that term represents a real phenomenon.” Here are some examples of growing civil unrest in Europe:
  • Belgium: Following the November 2015 terror attacks in France, Belgium’s Home Affairs Minister Jan Jambon stated that the Belgian government does not “have control of the situation in Molenbeek.” He described this as a “gigantic problem” without actually using the term No Go Zone.
  • France: Fox News created controversy in 2015 when they declared France had No Go Zones after the Charlie Hebdo shooting. However, looking beyond the hysteria, there’s considerable evidence that France has No Go Zones. In fact, Reuters referred to No Go Zones in Paris in October 2016. In June 2018, the French President Emmanuel Macron gave a speech with repeated euphemistic references to No Go Zones. The National Post, Canada’s paper of record, did an in-depth feature on No Go Zones in 2016. In 2017, an app launched called “No-Go Zone,” allowing the French to report lawless areas to be avoided. So while there may be a reflexive reaction to dismiss reports from Gatestone Institute or Breitbart on French No Go Zones as “right-wing propaganda,” there are no shortage of so-called “mainstream” sources reporting on No Go Zones in France.
  • Germany: Angela Merkel has spoken about No Go Zones as a “reality” in Germany. In April 2018, the Daily Mail reported on a poll showing that a majority of Germans feared No Go Zones, with over three quarters stating they believed the government should crack down harder on organized crime.
  • Sweden: Much of the media attention surrounding No Go Zones is centered on Sweden. Despite vehement denials, there is overwhelming evidence of No Go Areas in Sweden, no matter what term one chooses to use. An April 2018 Sputnik report described areas where emergency services cannot enter without significant police support. In 2018, the Prime Minister of Sweden referred to “parallel societies” in Sweden. The spectre of civil war in Sweden is openly discussed in Parliament. A 2017 RT article quoted Swedish National Police Commissioner Dan Eliassonas saying “we cannot continue in this direction ten more years.” In December 2017, the nation’s chief prosecutor described a Stockholm suburb as being like “a war zone” and stating that she would look to countries like El Salvador and Colombia for potential strategies.
  • United Kingdom: President Donald Trump was ridiculed for suggesting the presence of No Go Areas in the UK, however, there is evidence to suggest he was correct. Raheem Kassam, a UKIP activist and former Breitbart UK Editor in Chief has written an entire book on the subject. Kassam is of Tanzanian extraction and was raised as an Ismaili Muslim, though he now identifies as an atheist. An anonymous London police officer went on popular British radio program LBC and stated that the British capital did in fact have “No Go Areas.” Councillors for Leeds suburb Bradford have similarly described areas of that city.

How Is the Specter of No Go Zones Influencing European Politics?

No Go Zones are not currently dominating political discourse in any European country. They are, however, forming a persistent backdrop in nearly every European nation. Populist-nationalist parties use them as a frequent talking point to pillory the establishment parties of both the left and the right. For their part, establishment political parties tend to deny the existence of No Go Zones entirely. To what degree No Go Zones are a factor in anyone’s vote is highly speculative.
In the middle of summer 2018, riots broke out in Sweden. Many on the left blamed the riots on the popularity of Sweden Democrats, an anti-immigration populist party. This only seemed to bolster their support among Swedes. Moderate Party MP Hanif Bali denied that this was the cause of the riots. Bali, the son of immigrants, is a staunch critic of Sweden’s immigration policies, showing that these criticisms are not limited to the Sweden Democrats. Bali is the only Swedish politician of note within the more mainstream parties to state that he is open to the possibility of a coalition with Sweden Democrats.

How Likely Are No Go Zones to Result in Failed States?

This is a difficult question to answer, because there’s no history of pockets of No Go Zones metastasizing into failed states in Western Europe. However, some Western European countries have hallmarks of incipient failed states, such as:
  • Ceding their monopoly on legitimate violence. Sharia courts, for example, operate with relative impunity in the UK.
  • An unwillingness or inability to exercise sovereignty over its territory. The extended rioting in France and Sweden’s No Go Zones provide an example of this.
  • Escalation of communal or tribal conflicts. As No Go Zones grow, it’s almost a given that communal conflicts will escalate.
  • Guerilla conflict. Similarly, as No Go Zones grow, they may come to resemble completely autonomous areas and bases for terrorist attacks, such as the Moro areas of the Philippines.
  • Finally, there’s the specter of democratic collapse in Western Europe. What will happen, for example, if the Sweden Democrats win a plurality in parliament, but cannot form a government and neither can any collection of their rivals? How about if sections of the military or security apparatus start taking sides?
End of article by

In answer to the question of (“How Likely Are No Go Zones to Result in Failed States?”) and the answer: (“there’s no history of pockets of No Go Zones metastasizing into failed states in Western Europe”) This has however been the process historically in ‘taking - over’ all other countries in the rest of the world that are now Islamic States. The examples in my lifetime are the Lebanon Hezbollah, and the country of Indonesia which is now the largest Muslim country in the world. Both were Christian parliamentary democracies. They were both surreptitiously taken over incrementally by Muslims beginning with No Go Zones.

THE BOTTOM LINE: No Go Zones have already taken over complete towns and in some cases counties and voting districts in American States. Moreover they will continue to expand until they have taken control of entire states, then the second American Civil War will begin. The truth has been exposed that the Muslims have been - and are now getting ready and training for the Jihad of America. That’s just a proven fact that has obviously been ignored and even enabled by our criminal Congress and its DeepState Media. But the real question I have for you my friend is…are YOU ready to defend the American Constitutional Republic. Or will you just do as every country in history that is now an Islamic State has done, and just give up your country to the Ummah Jihad Mujahideen (the world nation of Islam)?

If you do nothing now about this historical fact, your children and grandchildren will be left to live with your lack of responsibility.

"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government." -- Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address, March 4, 1837

"The tyranny of a principal in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy." --Montesquieu, 1748

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your family and or friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.