Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Amerislam Part II

Islam is being taught in the nation's public schools as a religion to be embraced because "organized Muslim infiltrators have gained control of textbook content," this according to an organization that analyzes textbooks.

By de Andréa

Further proof that Islam is in, and Christianity is out, the deception of Islam is surreptitiously infiltrating American schools and rapidly gaining ground toward the agenda of conquest in this country even faster that I would have guessed.

The American Textbook Council has concluded that the situation is the consequence of "the interplay of determined Islamic political activists, textbook editors, and multicultural anti-American minded social studies curriculum planners."

The slippery slope
It has gone so far now, that correcting the situation now becomes a problem. "Educational publishers and educational organizations have bought into claims propounded by Islamists – and they themselves have become agents of misinformation."
This comes from Gilbert T. Sewall, who not only wrote the organization's report on Islam and textbooks, but also generated a response to the flood of criticism he encountered.

William J. Bennetta, author of The Textbook Letter and a fellow of the California Academy of Sciences, has also documented dozens of instances of advocacy for or against a belief system, and has produced a list of books where the "religion preaching" leaves them "unfit for use."

Indeed, Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes has repeatedly expressed concern about the "privileging of Islam in the United States" and warns the stakes go well beyond 7th-grade texts. His opinion of Houghton Mifflin’s “Across the Centuries” is full of "apologetics" and "distortions."
Read a recently reported on a case in Oregon, where parent Kendalee Garner objected to having her son being taught the religion of Islam, including the memorization of the "Five Pillars" of Islam and dressing up as a Muslim.

That episode followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago not to review a lower court's ruling that a similar class requirement in the Byron Union School District in California, where students were instructed to "become Muslims" was "cultural education."

I also reported that a man arrested as a terror suspect for allegedly trying to transport $340,000 from a group tied to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, and who reputedly had connections to Osama bin Laden, helped write the "Religious Expression in Public Schools" guidelines issued by President Clinton during his administration.

Abdurahman Alamoudi with President Clinton, Vice President Gore .

Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was president of the American Muslim Council and a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, worked with President Clinton and the American Civil Liberties Union when the guidelines later used by a federal judge concluded such teaching was legal, were deemed in compliance.

Sewall said in his elaboration that his study showed world history textbooks "hold Islam and other non-Western civilizations to different standards than those that apply to the West" even while "Islamic pressure groups and their allies seek to suppress the critical analysis of Islam inside and outside classrooms."

Such textbooks result when "nervous publishers" obey educational fashion and rely more heavily on diversity experts than on trustworthy scholarship, he said.

Textbook editors seem not to recognize that a school-related Islamic agenda in the U.S. deceptively uses multiculturalism as a device to guarantee a purely favorable and uncritical view of all things Muslim. At extremes, multiculturalism contributes to a precursor form of peaceable cultural jihad meant to deceive the American bureaucracy.

The ATC describes itself as an independent national research organization set up in 1989 to review the history and social studies textbooks used in the nation's schools.

Also contributing to the criticism is the work of Bennetta, whose conclusions are available at He finds that textbooks from a wide range of many of the best-known publishing houses used in public schools today simply should not be there.

Textbooks that major publishers try to sell to public schools, sometimes contain fraudulent passages that function as instruments of Islamic indoctrination: Myths are depicted as accounts of real people and events, superstitions are depicted as matters of fact, and the origins of Islamic writings are obscured or are wrapped in outright lies," Bennetta wrote.

"These passages of Islamic propaganda have been devised by individuals or groups that seek to use the public schools for spreading their own sectarian doctrines and for recruiting converts. In various cases, publishers evidently have accepted material from Islamic pressure groups and have put the material into textbooks, even though it is laden with blatant preaching, miracle-mongering and fake 'history,'" he said.

Bennetta, cites a Houghton Mifflin book "Across the Centuries" as having a lot of Muslim "propaganda.” He said the 1999 version has one thing an earlier edition did not; an apparent source. Listed as a consultant is "Shabbir Mansuri, Founding Director, Council on Islamic Education, Fountain Valley, California."

Bennetta said the CIE is "a conspicuous terrorists Muslim outfit that evidently specializes in inducing schoolbook-writers to sanitize and eulogize Islam, to retail Muslim religious claims as facts, to retail Muslim woo-woo as history, and to depict Islam as an amicable religion that resembles, and is compatible with, Judaism and Christianity."

He said other texts and publishers for which he has found a basis for criticism include "Human Heritage: A World History" by Glencoe/McGraw-Hill. "A Message of "Ancient Days" by Houghton Mifflin. “ Across the Centuries" by Houghton Mifflin. "Heath World History: Perspectives on the Past" by McDougal Littell; "Ancient World" by McGraw-Hill School Division; "Making Thirteen Colonies" by Oxford University Press, "World History: Continuity and Change" by Holt, Rinehart and Winston; and "World Cultures: A Global Mosaic" by Prentice Hall, among others.

A concern raised by Swarthmore historian James Kurth notes "the possibility of structural incompatibility between Islam and the American polity" because of the determination of Islam to Infiltrate American society rather than to assimilate.

Houghton Mifflin's chief publicist, Collin Earnst, also criticized the report, suggesting that such "bias has misled the public into believing that Islam is a barbaric and murderous religion." Possibly Houghton hasn’t read Allah’s words in the Quran about killing those that reject Allah and his prophet Muhammad.

Sewall cited one passage from Houghton Mifflin's "Patterns of Interaction":
"In Islam, following the law is a religious obligation. Muslims do not separate their personal life from their religious life, and Islamic law regulates almost all areas of human life. Because of this, Islamic law helped to bring order to Muslim states. It provided the state with a set of “values” that shaped a common identity. In addition to unifying individual states, Sharia law helped to unify the Muslim world. Even though various Muslim states might have ethnic or cultural differences, they lived under a common law."
That, Sewall said, "conveys nothing.” Further, it never explains that Sharia bears "no resemblance to U.S. law, which grew out of the British constitution."

Other criticism came from the report's concerns over why Muslims so often don't get along with neighbors. "Looking at Algeria, Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines, for example, where religious wars are being conducted today against infidels, this proposition is more than plausible," Sewall wrote.

In the California case that was litigated, Edward White III, of the Thomas More Law Center wondered, "Would it have been 'equally considered cultural education' if students were in simulated baptisms, wearing a crucifix, having taken the name of St. John and with praise banners saying 'Praise be to Jesus Christ' on classroom walls?"

From Nyssa, Ore., where one parent raised objections to the Islamic teachings, Supt. Don Grotting, said the text includes assignments for students to learn the "Five Pillars" and study Ramadan.

Sewall said textbooks in America promoting deception, should "explain the basic Wahhabist teaching of the Quran that promotes separatism, oppression, conquest and theocracy. Instead, they are trying to trim history to please Islamic pressure groups and allied ideologues.

"The implications for U.S. civic education are immense, especially if students are unaware of or even accept the idea that for politically esthetic reasons they are being lied to or emotionally manipulated." It will simply take a generation of blindsided deceived students to change America from a secular constitutional republic with a Christian foundation, to an Islamic oppressive theocracy from Hell.

"If our nation's cultural underpinnings are in conflict with religious dogma and values that are intent on replacing or even eradicating them, should not children and their teachers be made aware? In addition, what key points might replace the obvious flaws in the current generation of textbooks? Moreover that Islam is a real force in the world today, an insurgency that is a real threat to the nation's democratic way of life and freedoms that its citizens often take for granted."

"Today, Christmas and Nativity scenes are outlawed while Clinton's nominee, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton, recently approved 'Islam: A Simulation' where children learn to become Muslim, recite the Quran, fast for Ramadan and pray to Allah including this prayer: 'In the name of Allah,. Praise be to Allah, Lord of Creation, The, King of Judgment-day! You alone we worship, and to You alone we pray for help, Guide us to the Your path,'" wrote Jen Shroder, on her website.

Shroder wrote "America does not comprehend the Muslim resolve to make America an Islamic State, Even though suicide bombers have already demonstrated their willingness to kill and die for it."

de Andréa

Monday, November 26, 2007


Is Hollywood located in the Middle east, or is it in California???

By de Andréa

I have to assume that the act of treason does not exist anymore. This assumption is based on the anti- American garbage that is coming out of Hollywood lately that is obviously in direct support of America’s enemy in a time of war.

The Constitution does itself does not create the offense; it only restricts the definition. The crime is prohibited by legislation passed by Congress. Therefore the United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death. Or shall at the very least be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States

On October 11, 2006, a federal grand jury issued the first indictment for treason against the United States since 1952, charging Adam Yahiye Gadahn for videos in which he spoke supportively of al-Qaeda.

Recently, Hollywood has presented the Film Rendition, Redacted, and Lyons for Lambs, as well as a few others, which are clearly anti-American and support the Islamic cause of overthrowing the American Government and all in a time of war. If one cannot bring themselves far enough back in history to where treason was treason then possibly one could squeeze out a vote for sedition.

Hollywood must be getting a pass on its films of treason; Adan Yahive Gadahn was indicted in 2006 for treason, producing videos in support of our enemy. Maybe there is a legal difference between a video and a movie. On the other hand, maybe Gadahn just didn’t have quite the political pull or available funds that Hollywood producers have.

Maybe it is true, if one is popular or powerful enough or gives money to the right polititians, one can commit treason or or any crime, even the crime of murder like O.J. or Robert Blake and get away with it.

Where did all the justice go??? Maybe the same place the Constitution went, wherever that is...

de Andréa

Sunday, November 18, 2007

EU Gun Ban

The EU may be setting itself up for a fall

By de Andréa

In a desperate effort to curb crime in the UK, they may be setting the EU up on a fast track to an Islamic takeover...

I will first address the issue and then explain why I believe this may be the beginning of the slippery slope for Europe.

A British MEP is hoping to "fast track" a new EU deal on gun control and says last week's school massacre in Finland should act as a wake up call.

Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy, who chairs a key committee in the British parliament, said a new deal could be in place by the end of the year.

Echoes of Dunblane, another knee jerk reaction:
Eight people, including five teenage boys, the headmistress, a female nurse and a single mother, died when 18-year-old Pekka-Eric Auvinen ran amok with a gun in the school in the small town of Jokela Finland last Wednesday.

Ms McCarthy, who represents the North West Region, said: "In the wake of the Dunblane tragedy, the UK toughened its gun laws, and we banned all handguns. “ The shooting in Finland is yet another tragedy that shows the carnage and destruction which weapons in the wrong hands can wreek. The key words here are “the wrong hands”, how anyone can think that passing more laws against the possession of guns will have any affect on criminals, who by their very definition do not obey laws, will keep guns from getting into “the wrong hands” is a mystery. However, they will keep them out of the right hands, because only the law abiding obey the law. Law, will unfortunately not prevent the tragedy that an unstable vulnerable young man was able to have access to a handgun.

"In Finland any adult may own a gun provided it is registered with a shooting club and 1.8 million guns are owned in a population of 5.3 million people. The incident is a wake up call,” says Ms Mc Carthy

While the EU cannot intervene in sovereign countries' own gun laws, Ms McCarthy's committee on the internal market is hoping to push through a new directive - replacing Directive 477, which was passed in 1991 - which would set a series of basic standards which all EU member states would have to abide by.

She told the BBC: "We are still negotiating but we are down to the nitty gritty and I hope to get it signed off soon. I am trying to get it fast tracked by the end of the year."

The directive would include background checks that would have to be carried out before people can purchase guns, new measures would be brought in to ensure guns are registered and can be traced back to their owners; new controls on convertible weapons and control of internet trade in firearms.

What Ms. McCarthy fails to recognize is that most of these these laws are already in place in Finland and one can see that it had no effect on the safety of a gun free school. Moreover, no amount of hysterical decisions regarding this issue will stop this kind of tragic crime.

"I am pleased that member states are supporting my amendments to include 'convertible weapons' in the review of EU law. Ms McCarthy said: "My objective is to cut the supply of these guns, banned in the UK and smuggled in from Lithuania and Germany and currently being used to kill young people on our streets."

THE BOTTOM LINE: I am really blown away by the Ignorance of some educated people in government who say they know what is best for everybody else. I do not know if this speaks for the corruption in our educational system or reflects only on those individuals that exhibit the dregs of blind ignorance, but the result is nevertheless the same.

Not only do more laws that only law-abiding people are known to obey, not have any effect on lowering the crime rate, but they just may increase the violent crime because law-abiding potential victims are not likely to be armed. Statistics especially in the UK bear this out. The gun ban is either the cause of the increase in violent crime in the UK and everywhere else it has been tried, or it is the beginning of oppression.

The Islamic Connection
The Framers of the US Constitution knew that citizens must be armed, if for no other reason, then to maintain the security of a Free State. Europe today, is on the fast track to Islamic control, Sharia law is quickly replacing domestic law, and the culture is rapidly becoming Muslim. What happens to a society that is fast loosing their historical way of life, when in the face of a militant culture bent on taking over the world has its base citizenry disarmed? Criminals will be armed, Muslims will be armed, and the corrupt governments infiltrated with these mindless politically correct multiculturalists or the infiltrated Islamic Militants will be armed. However, the majority of the country’s free citizens will be helplessly disarmed. Can you, as they say, connect the dots? ……..

de Andréa

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Follow up to No Angel

Another Victory! Mrs. Arnold gets her Angel. Anti-Christmas policy rescinded.

American Family Association

Dear De Andrea,
Thanks to your efforts, the Plant City Living Center recognized they were mistaken in not allowing residents to display Christian symbols. HUD says its policy is clear and that discrimination against Mrs. Arnold (and angels) will not be tolerated in HUD approved facilities.
Plant City Living Center attorney Steve Edelstein issued this statement today:

"I am pleased to report that the Plant City Living Center's recent newsletter regarding holiday decoration policies has been rescinded. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guarantees the rights of citizens to display religious symbols in public. We support that guarantee."

"I want to take this opportunity to reiterate to you and to inform your readers that Plant City Living Center respects the religious beliefs of all of its residents. In furtherance of that policy, Plant City Living Center allows residents to decorate their apartments and the exterior areas of their apartments in any manner they choose. To use your recent Action Alert as an example, this policy allows any resident to place a small Christmas tree outside their door and to decorate their tree in any way they wish. By the way, Plant City's policy also allows angels to be displayed in common areas."

"The irritating question is, if HUD guarantees the rights of citizens to display religious symbols in public as they now say; then why did they deny the right earlier in the week? On the other hand, do they legislate as they please, depending on the pressure or which way the wind is blowing," said De Andrea.

Sincerely, Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman American Family Association

Sunday, November 11, 2007

No Angels

That’s right, no angels on Christmas trees says the United States Federal Government, matter of fact, no Christmas trees…

By de Andréa

Federal law prohibits one from displaying any religious words or items associated with Christmas. If that is not enough, try this; one cannot even say the word Christmas at a Christmas party, one must use the word holiday instead

This is not the Nazi Gestapo, the Soviet Kremlin, or an Islamic Caliphate; or is it?

The [PCLC} Plant City Living Center in Plant City Florida has told Mrs. Arnold, an 85-year-old grandmother, that federal law prohibits her from displaying any religious words or items associated with Christmas in the common area of her apartment building.

According to the Center, the Director of HUD Fair Housing regulatory dept. Sonja Horn from The Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a directive banning "any religious symbols or religious words associated with Christmas.” Under the guidelines issued by HUD, the elderly grandmother cannot place a small Christmas tree outside her door if it contains any religious symbols or religious words, even an angel!

If the residents want to have a Christmas party in their Community room, they cannot call it a Christmas party. The Center says HUD directs residents not to use the word "Christmas" but to use the word "Holiday."

A Sunday school class from a church near Mrs. Arnold's apartment comes every year to host a Hanging of the Greens and ”Christmas Party” for all the residents. She said the highlight of their “Christmas Party” comes at the very end of The Hanging of the Greens when someone places the angel on top of their Christmas tree. The United States federal government now bans their religious tradition. As well as the “Christmas Party” but will allow a “Holiday Party”.

The federal government is becoming increasingly active in banning Christianity from the public square. [Prohibiting the free exercise thereof] Earlier, the National Park Service removed the wording "Laus Deo" (Latin for "Praise be to God") from a replica of the cap of the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C. and the Veterans Administration banned the script of the flag-folding ceremony mentioning "Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob," and "Father, Son and Holy Ghost" at over 100 national cemeteries. Both of these rules were rescinded after U.S. citizens inundated the Fed with letters, phone calls and e-mails. I discovered today with a phone call to the Property Manager at PCLC that because of the public outrage this regulation too, has been rescinded.

To listen to the grandmother's conversation about the situation, click here. To read the HUD directive, click here.

We have Ramadan in the white house and EID on our U.S. Christmas…excuse me [holiday] Stamps but we cannot say the word Christmas or have angels on our Christmas…excuse me [holiday] tree.

I suppose I must once again remind the United States Federal Government of Federal “Constitutional Law”

“To the conventions of the several states, having at the time of their adopting the constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its power, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added:. And as extending the ground of public confidence in the government, will best insure the benefit ends of its institution. (Emphasis mine)

Article 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech….”

How many violations of the United States Federal Constitution do you see??? Do you see an abuse of power by any chance??? Or maybe the prohibition of the free exercise of religion??? Or possibly abridging the freedom of speech??? How about making a law or a rule respecting the establishment of religion???

It does not take a Philadelphia lawyer to see that at the very least; the Federal Government is abusing its power, moreover, could even be on several counts, violating the supreme law of the land, The United States Constitution.

If this isn’t bad enough, could it be that the United States Federal Government is in the process of Establishing Islam as the National Religion??? Ramadan and EID in the White house…? Imams praying to Allah before a session.of Congress? Say it isn’t so… I am sorry, it is so, and all while Christmas is not allowed in our White House.

We must not be silent; the fact that these outrages violations of our rights have been overturned is because of the response of the people. This shows that the system is still working. However, it works only if we participate, if we remain silent we, will be silenced.

Remain Vigilant…de Andréa

Thursday, November 08, 2007


Congressman Fortney “Pete” Stark is a congressman from the San Francisco East Bay Area in California, Fremont and Alameda Counties

By de Andréa

I happen to know Pete Stark very well; he would cringe every time he would see me in his audience at a town hall meeting. In my years of dealing with the congressman I can testify first hand the that he is a liar and a hypocrite as well as having no moral values.

In one of his responses to me regarding a letter I had written to him about “Partial Birth Abortion”, he absolutely denied that there was anything on the planet called, referred to, or implied as partial birth abortion. When I attempted to read my question in a town hall meeting and his response in the letter, he quickly called on someone else for another question. From then on, he made a special effort to avoid me.

Early on, I determined that Pete Stark was either very ignorant, totally misinformed, or he was the biggest liar that I had ever met.

This man as no regard for the life of anyone except his own. He not only supports abortion on demand but he advocates infanticide. Therefore, as a public advocate for protecting children he is a liar and a hypocrite. His following reference to “if we can get enough kids to grow old enough to send to Iraq” is not only condescending but also disingenuous.

If we all followed Pete’s lead, we would not even have any children to grow up at all…

Here are Congressman Stark’s comments made Thursday, Oct. 18, on the floor of the House of Representatives: “You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement.”

This comment made on world wide TV displays “Pete” Fortney Stark’s true colors. He not only claims that our enemy Islam is innocent, but implies that we send our children to war for the purpose of getting their heads blown off. Another ode of support for our enemy Islam. He stated that President Bush is no better than al-Qaida, with the same agenda to behead American soldiers and with amusing entertainment. I can hear the cheers in Mecca, Medina and Tehran now…

Congressman Stark has now apologized on the House floor after an outrage of pressure from the American people. If this were the only outrages statement or even one of the few that Stark had ever made, I would give him the benefit of any doubt that his apology was genuine. However, this just another of the typical lack of any moral values and hate America attitude that Mr. Stark has. Watch a film clip of Pete Stark as he spews out his filth and vomit on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

The following is his official congressionally appropriate apology:
“I want to apologize first of all to my colleagues, many of whom I have offended, to the president. his family, to the troops that may have found offense in my remarks as were suggested in the motion that we just voted on, and I do apologize ... With this apology I will become as insignificant as I should be and we can return to the issues that do divide us but that we can resolve," Stark said to applause. “Typical Stark Speak”

THE BOTTOM LINE: I even find his apology offensive, stating that the troops MAY have found his remarks offensive, implying that he does not understand how that would be possible, but oh well! It is what it is…

de Andréa

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Barack Obama

Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth Harkin stand during the national anthem, all show respect to our flag and country except Senator Obama.

By de Andrea


Will he also refuse to take the oath to uphold the Constitution should he God forbid become president? This is a prime example of the success of Islamic infiltration. This may be proof of the trust that Islam has in their doctrine of taqiya (Allah’s deception as taught in the Quran) A Muslim U.S, Presidential Candidate obtusely deifying American Patriotism in front of all to see, obviously has no fear of discovery as a possible Islamic plant. So developed is Islams art of deception that Obama Hussein Obama running for the most powerful office in the world is not the least bit concerned that someone might question his loyalty to America, even when he blatantly defies it.

Obama was born Barack Hussein Obama in August 4, 1961 in Honolulu Hawaii. His mother was a white American and a reportedly a relative of V.P. Dick Chaney, his father was a Black Muslim who became an official in the government of Kenya. Obama was brought up as a Muslim, educated in Muslims schools, and according to Muslim tradition is a Muslim.

His father Barack Obama, Sr. a Muslim, was born in Nyanaza Kenya and his mother Ann Dunham an Atheist, was born in Wichita, Kansas. His parents met while both were both attending the University of Hawaii in Manoa, where his father was enrolled as a foreign student. Obama's parents separated when he was two years old and later divorced. His father later returned to Kenya, where became an official in the Kenyan government and later died in an auto accident when the younger Obama was twenty-one years old.

His mother married another Muslim, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian foreign student, and the family moved to Jakarta Indonesia in 1967, where Obama attended local Muslim Wahhabi schools from ages 6 to 10. He then returned to Honolulu to live with his maternal grandparents while attending Poncho School from 5th grade until his graduation in 1979. Obama's mother died in 1995

THE BOTTOM LINE: One can see that Barrack Obama had a Muslim family and an early Muslim educational background. Moreover, if Obama owes no allegiance to America as he has clearly demonstrated by his refusal to say the Pledge or to respect our flag, then one can only ask to whom does Obama owe his allegiance???

The fact that Al-Qaida wants Obama for President may shed a little light on this question of whether or not Obama is a Muslim. Australian Prime Minister John Howard, a staunch Bush ally who has sent troops to Iraq and faces his own re-election bid this year, said Obama's proposals would spell disaster for the west. "If I were running al-Qaida in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008 and be praying as many times as possible for a victory, for Obama”…. He said…

Whether or not Barrack Obama is a Muslim plant, the fact that the Muslims believe that Obama is a Muslim should be a concern for us all, especially in light of the fact that Islam our enemy is Infiltrating this country at lighting speed. A question to ponder would be---during the Second World War would we have allowed a candidate educated in Nazism to run for President of these United States. I hardly think so, nor would he or Senator Keith Ellison another professed Muslim be a U.S. senator, in contrast he instead, may have been incarcerated in a camp…

de Andréa

Friday, November 02, 2007


More than ever, it is still a problem…

If you think you are safe because of homeland security then you haven’t… well, check it out

By de Andréa

Because of America’s new religion of Multicultural Tolerant Political Correctness the feel good religion of the left wing extremist and Islam, instead of profiling our enemy, we are still profiling the elderly grandmothers and Nuns in wheel chairs. I feel good, how about you???

I did some research about the number of Catholic Nuns that have gone to flight school learning how to fly commercial planes into buildings or have been caught while trying to smuggle box cutters, bombs, or guns onto commercial airliners. As one might guess, it was truly a waste of time, just as it is a waste of time doing a body search of Nuns at airports.

Because of the Islamic Infiltration, and the influence of Islam in the security of America, we are banned from identifying an obvious possible threat to Internal Security. The result of this deception of Islam and the blind ignorance of the U.S., is the following:

At Los Angeles International Airport, TSA screeners have missed 75% of the fake bombs planted to test security.

This Politically Correct nonsense evidenced here in this photo at Detroit Metro might give one a clue why they are not finding the bombs while not profiling these Middle Eastern looking undercover agents... they are too busy frisking elderly, wheelchair-bound nuns. One cannot help but notice the humiliation while this Nun while she stands in front of her wheel chair in the public eye, as a TSA screener appears to be examining her crotch.

Security screeners at two of the nation’s busiest airports failed to find fake bombs hidden on undercover agents posing as passengers in an average of more than 60% of tests last year.

According to a classified TSA report, screeners at Los Angeles International Airport missed as many as 75% of simulated explosives and bomb parts that undercover Transportation Security Administration testers hid under their clothes or in carry-on bags at checkpoints.

At Chicago O’Hare International Airport, screeners missed about 60% of hidden bomb materials that were packed in everyday carry-ons — including toiletry kits, briefcases and CD players.

The TSA ran about 70 tests at Los Angeles, 75 at Chicago and 145 at San Francisco. The failure rates at Los Angeles and Chicago stunned security experts. [Which means, they didn’t feel good or tolerant]

The report showed that San Francisco International Airport screeners, who work for a private company instead of the TSA, missed about 20% of the bombs. While having an 80% chance of not being blown up on ones way to visit the relatives this thanksgiving might cause one to feel a little better, it is sill however unacceptable. However, subjecting oneself to a 75% chance of not making it back from the holiday, as in taking a flight out of L.A., I think one would have a better chance of surviving the Iraqi war. The main reason however, for the improved security in S.F., is the fact that they are a private security company and less likely to be influenced by the Islamic infiltrators.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I think it has become quite obvious that it is not our great security that has kept us from having another 9/11, but instead the fact that the Islamic terrorists have not been planning another attack, at least not from the air. They have instead been concentrating on the Infiltration of every aspect of our government to control our response to a possible future terrorist attack. It has also become self-evident that if the Muslim extremist terrorists don’t kill us, the PC extremists (the feel good tolerant terrorists) will…

de Andréa