Thursday, March 30, 2017

Sanctuary Cities Are Dangerous


Sanctuary Cities Are Dangerous

The lawless states:

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted March 30, 2017

Getty Images
Despite a funding cut-off threat from the Justice Department, over 300 so-called "sanctuary cities" are illegally protecting thousands of illegal criminal aliens and terrorists from federal arrest and deportation, according to a new analysis.

Criminal foreigners illegally in this country are being shielded from justice by criminal, “sanctuary city” policies, said Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday.

If you live in’, or anywhere near’ one of the cities counties or states I hope you carry a gun, your life is or will be in danger.  Because as dangerous as they are now, they will only get worse.  Moreover, they are all in violation of Federal and Constitutional law.  Even states laws prohibit the protection and harboring of known criminals.
California is even threatening secession to protect the terrorists, criminals, and rapists illegally pouring into the state.  But then what can one expect from a bunch of useful idiots and Communist Fabians.
Reading his prepared statement, A.G. Sessions repeated a previous commitment to lawfully withhold federal funding, from states and localities that refuse to comply with lawful detention and transfer orders from federal immigration authorities.
Jurisdictions operating “sanctuary” policies, said Sessions, are refusing to comply with detainer requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for illegal aliens charged or convicted with “serious crimes,” including murder, rape, assault, and sexual abuse of children, drug trafficking, and intoxicated driving.
"Countless Americans would be alive today – and countless loved ones would not be grieving today – if the policies of these sanctuary jurisdictions were ended," said Sessions.  Sessions pointed to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report identifying over 200 instances in a single week (January 28 - February 3, 2017) where “sanctuary” jurisdictions refused to honor detainer requests filed by ICE.

"Sanctuary city" policies, said Sessions, endanger Americans: "Such policies cannot continue. They make our nation less safe by putting dangerous criminals back on our streets."
The example of Kate Steinle, who was shot and killed in July 2015 by an illegal alien Mexican who was deported 5 times, was protected by the sanctuary city of San Francisco, was mentioned by Sessions:
"We all remember the tragic case of Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed two years ago in San Francisco as she walked along a pier with her father.  The shooter, Francisco Sanchez, was an illegal immigrant who had already been deported five times and had seven felony convictions.   
Just eleven weeks before the shooting, San Francisco had released Sanchez from its custody, even though ICE had filed a detainer requesting that he be kept in custody until immigration authorities could pick him up for removal.  Even worse, Sanchez admitted that the only reason he came to San Francisco was because of its sanctuary policies."
Steinle's death was regularly mentioned by President Donald Trump during his presidential campaign as one well known extreme example of the dangers posed by the status quo of illegal aliens, for which he was demonized as an immigrant hater and a racist.
Sessions also called for states and localities to comply with 8 U.S. Code § 1373, which generally prohibits any government entity from interfering with the transmission or reception of information regarding the immigration status of any individual. 

THE BOTTOM LINE: Whenever a question arises concerning an important issue such as immigration, the best and most reliable source for finding what this Nation should do in solving any problem that we face is to look to the United States Constitution.
Over the years I have posted many articles on the Constitution. I have claimed that I am a Constitutional scholar, not because I am so educated, even though I do have two degrees on Constitutional studies from the University of Hillsdale in Hillsdale Michigan,(something that anyone can do by the way), but because the general American population are so uneducated.  I do believe that as a citizen of this Free Republic it is our responsibility to know our Constitutional Law and understand the true and real intent of our Founders in writing this wonderful inspired document. Something that even most of our Supreme Court Justices do not know or much less care about.

While the Declaration of Independence documents our God given rights of, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” the Constitution by the rule of law, insures that those rights are protected even from the federal and state governments.

 We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Amendment 14, Section 1 – “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

While there are only two specific references in the Constitution to immigration , stated in this most important of documents as , “naturalization, ” there is clear evidence by the Framers as to what they intended concerning the rights of the people who live in this country and how those rights affect immigrants and illegal aliens.

The two references in the Constitution that specifically mention , “naturalization, ” are found in Article I, Section 8 in creating the authority of the Congress, “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” Thus from a Constitutional stand point it is the responsibility of Congress to establish all laws and rules of naturalization or immigration. Not the states.

The second reference is located in the 14th Amendment shown above stating that, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,” are, “citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The key thought in the 14th Amendment which along with several other provisions established in the Constitution shows that the intent of the Framers was that only citizens of the United States whether born or naturalized are granted the rights and privileges that are available in America.

Thanks for listening my friend!  Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

 





Sunday, March 26, 2017

BLM Attempted Robbery of Bundy Cattle



BLM Attempted Robbery of Bundy Cattle 
The Tyranny of the Federal Government

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted March 26, 2017



The “Battle of Bunkerville” Nevada lasted six days in April 2014, eventually ending without any gunfire. (Photo: Reuters)

An update on the BLM vs. Cliven Bundy…
Fraudulently misrepresenting themselves to be documentary filmmakers, FBI agents gathered footage played in court this week in the trial of six men who participated in a nearly weeklong standoff with federal agents in defense of Cliven Bundy’s Nevada cattle ranch in April 2014.
FBI Special Agent Charles Johnson gave detailed testimony this week about the footage, said to be shot for a production called “America Reloaded,” which effectively drew statements from at least three of the men on trial, according to reports.
In footage played Thursday, defendant Gregory Burleson told the undercover agents he was ready to kill federal agents, and was disappointed things ended without bloodshed, according to KLAS-TV.   Just the day before, a federal informant testified that Burleson was a paid FBI informant in 2012, though it’s unclear when or if he ever stopped working for the feds.
“What I was looking for was just a show of support,” defendant Scott Drexler told the fraudulent undercover filmmakers, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “It seems as if when there are armed people around a situation, then the authorities have to be a little more civil, have to treat you like a person. If nobody is facing any kind of consequences for their actions, they can just do whatever they want.”
The “Battle of Bunkerville” started after Bundy refused to pay more than two decades of illegally charged federal fees, which he racked up after allowing his cows to graze on American public lands which the BLM claims as its own. The Bureau of Land Management officials went to Bundy’s ranch to steal his cattle in lieu of the $1 million in fees. But Bundy, his sons, and dozens of others showed up to stop the BLM agents, in what prosecutors called “a massive armed assault against federal law enforcement officers.”  When what it really was, was a defense of Cliven Bundy’s property against an illegal warrantless confiscation of Bundy’s personal property, by an illegal department of the Federal Government which according to the U.S. Federal Constitution, isn’t allowed to own or control public land.
“We had the cowboys and Cliven all down below us, and BLM on the other side of the gate,” said Drexler in the footage, adding that when BLM “started moving to the gate with their military weapons and full combat gear, it started to get a little bit tense.”  It appeared that the FBI wanted another Waco or a Ruby Ridge altercation. Just itching for an excuse to blow somebody away. 
One of the undercover agents asked him what would happen if “somebody just farted.” Drexler said, “I don’t think a loud fart woulda put anyone off, but a gunshot sure would have.”
“I want to stand for the Constitution,” said Eric Parker in the video. “I don’t think you have to be in the militia for that.”
In the end no shots were fired, and the standoff ended peacefully when BLM officials finally backed off and abandoned their illegal theft efforts. A total of 19 people were eventually arrested and jailed in connection with the six-day standoff. The current trial is the first of three expected to happen this year.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  Well this my friend should be part of Trumps “Draining of the Swamp.”  The BLM is clearly part of the Federal tyranny that has evolved now for over two hundred years with the unconstitutional illegal land grab beginning around 1976.   

 Here is the text of the U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, Congress was given exclusive authority over a ten square mile area to be designated the Seat of Government)
“The people of the United States empower the congress to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings: And, Congress has the power to set up a national capital of the United States that is outside the jurisdiction of any state. (Congress used this power to create Washington, DC, on swampland along the Potomac River that was originally part of Maryland.) Congress also has ultimate authority over all federal military facilities, even if they're located within particular states.”

    And yet the Federal BLM claims they own nearly 80 % of the western United States as seen on the BLM Map.   

It is time to overthrow the Dark State, the illegal shadow government that has taken over our country.  

Thanks for listening my friend!  Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Sunday, March 19, 2017



Kindergarten Teachers Receive Threats of Beheading From Muslim Students

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted March 19, 2017


It would be hard to believe that students as young as five would threaten to behead their teacher unless one is a student of Islam.  This is the report coming from Sydney Australia. Teachers are reporting that they and other Infidel students are being threatened by Muslim boys as young as five.

Question: What causes you to think that AMERICAN MUSLIMS are any different?  A Muslim is a Muslim, no matter where they are my friend. There is no such thing as a little bit Muslim, any more than one could be a little bit pregnant.

“Teachers at a primary school in Sydney, Australia have been threatened with beheading and other violence from young Islamic students, prompting one of them to quit her job.
Students as young as those in Year 5, according to the Daily Telegraph, are making the violent threats and pressuring others to read the Koran at Punchbowl Public School in Sydney.
Documents given to the newspaper allege that three staff members have taken a leave of absence owing to stress, received counselling and been awarded compensation after bullying from Islamic students.
One female teacher reportedly quit her job after it got too much for her. She claims she quit after receiving death threats to her family from her year 5 and 6 students, with some saying they would behead her.”
It would seem that no matter what, the so-called claimed “religion of peace” continues to produce the most violent young children already brainwashed as young as five. Islam young men clearly have no respect for the opposite sex, more importantly they have no respect for the opposite anything. They act as if the women, especially non-Muslim women are for their entertainment. Now, the children are showing what the religious ideology really practices.  Never forget, it is the young that practice most purely what their parents teach.

Estimates are that about 9 million Muslims of all ages are living in the United States in 2016, there are even more today and some of them are ISIS terrorists. This means that Muslims make up approximately 3% of the total U.S. population (which was a total of more than 322 million people in 2015), and I estimate that the Muslim share will double to 6% by 2035.  

Watch a Demographics report of 2016.  It will only take a Muslim population of about 4.5% to begin the slippery slope of no return to overthrow the Free Republic of America, turning it into a Muslim State. By then Europe and Australia will already be Muslim States  

THE BOTTOM LINE: Are you sure that you want your children and grandchildren subjected to this inevitability of beheading in public schools? Within the next 12 years, children killing children as well as teachers will be an everyday occurrence, as it is in many Muslim countries today.  

10 years ago I predicted that Europe would be on that slippery slope of no return to becoming an Islamic State and today that prediction is no longer a prediction, it’s now a reality.  We in the U.S. still have a couple of years to stop this inevitability, and even turn it around.  But only if “We The People” act by flooding Congress with emails now – here, by telling them to stop immigration from Islamic countries altogether.  And tell the autocratic over reaching Judges to go-suck-an egg!  The judicial has become unconstitutional, read it...

Like it or not we are at war for our very survival against the evil ideology of Islam.  You must convince your Representatives to actually read the complete Quran and  Hadith.  If the American Government would have read Hitler’s Nazi books ‘Mien Kampf’ and ‘The Third Reich’ in the early 1930s we could have headed off the Second World War in Europe.  And now we have made an even more serious mistake by not reading Mahammad’s books the Quran and the Hadith because Islam is Nazism on Metabolic Steroids.  

We cannot win this war if we fail to identify and eliminate the cause, because it will eat us from the inside like a killer parasite.     

Thanks for listening my friend!  Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

A German Nurse Tells It Like It Is



A German Nurse Tells It Like It Is

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted March 18, 2017


The following email letter was sent to me by one of my subscribers.  The writer tells the story the German government won’t allow the media to print.  So she leaks illegal emails to people in the U.S.  Leaks have become one of the only ways we can hear the truth of what is going on in the world these days. Because the truth has been forced underground my friend.

Just in case you don't think President Trump is doing the right thing! Read it!

Then pass this on to everyone you know!

****************

The email is titled: NURSE IN GERMANY SENDS A MESSAGE TO THE WORLD

"Yesterday, at the hospital, we had a meeting about how the situation here and at the other Munich hospitals is unsustainable. Clinics cannot handle the number of migrant medical emergencies, so they are starting to send everything to the main hospitals.

Many Muslims are refusing treatment by female staff, and we women are now refusing to go among those migrants!

Relations between the staff and migrants are going from bad to worse. Since last weekend, migrants going to the hospitals must be accompanied by police with K-9units.
 
Many migrants have AIDS, syphilis, open TB and many exotic diseases that we in Europe do not know how to treat.

If they receive a prescription to the pharmacy, they suddenly learn they have to pay cash. This leads to unbelievable outbursts, especially when it is about drugs for the children. They abandon the children with pharmacy staff with the words: So, cure them here yourselves!

So the police are not just guarding the clinics and hospitals, but also the large pharmacies.

We ask openly where are all those who welcomed the migrants in front of TV cameras with signs at train stations? Yes, for now, the border has been closed, but millions of them are already here and we will definitely not be able to get rid of them.

Until now, the number of unemployed in Germany was 2.2 million. Now it will be at least 3.5 million. Most of these people are completely unemployable. Only a small minimum of them have any education. What is more, their women usually do not work at all. I estimate that one in ten is pregnant. Hundreds of thousands of them have brought along infants and little kids under six, many emaciated and very needy.

If this continues and Germany re-opens its borders, I am going home to the Czech Republic. Nobody can keep me here in this situation, not even for double the salary back home, I came to Germany to work, not to Africa or the Middle East!

Even the professor who heads our department told us how sad it makes him to see the cleaning woman, who has cleaned every day for years for 800 euros and then meets crowds of young men in the hallways who just wait with their hands outstretched, wanting everything for free, and when they don't get it they throw a fit.

I really don't need this! But I am afraid that if I return home, at some point it will be the same in the Czech Republic. If the Germans, with their systems, cannot handle this, then, guaranteed, back home will be total chaos.

You - who have not come in contact with these people have absolutely no idea what kind of badly behaved desperados these people are, and how Muslims act superior to our staff, regarding their religious accommodation.

For now, the local hospital staff have not come down with the diseases these people brought here, but with so many hundreds of patients every day of this is just a question of time.

In a hospital near the Rhine, migrants attacked the staff with knives after they had handed over an 8-month-old on the brink of death, who they'd dragged across half of Europe for three months. The child died two days later, despite having received top care at one of the best pediatric clinics in Germany. The pediatric physician had to undergo surgery and the two nurses are recovering in the ICU. Nobody has been punished.

The local press is forbidden to write about it, so we can only inform you through email. What would have happened to a German if he had stabbed the doctor and nurses with a knife? Or if he had flung his own syphilis-infected urine into a nurses face and so threatened her with infection? At a minimum he would have gone straight to jail and later to court. With these people so far, nothing has happened,

And so I ask: Where are all those greeters and receivers from the train stations? Sitting pretty at home, enjoying their uncomplicated, safe lives. If it were up to me, I would round up all those greeters and bring them here first to our hospitals emergency ward as attendants! Then in to one of the buildings housing the migrants, so they can really look after them there themselves, without armed police and police dogs, who, sadly today, are in every hospital here in Bavaria."

Is this "situation" coming to your country?

"IF YOU DO NOT TAKE AN INTEREST IN THE AFFAIRS OF YOUR GOVERNMENT, THEN YOU ARE DOOMED TO LIVE UNDER THE RULE OF FOOLS”. – PLATO

(Emphasis is mine)

************

THE BOTTOM LINE:  This German Bavarian Nurse from the Czech Republic is telling you what I have been trying my best to tell the West was coming for the past 20 years.  And now… I am telling you that what has come to Europe is what is also coming to America within the next 10 years.  Moreover as the German nurse said “Yes, for now, the border has been closed, but millions of them are already here and we will definitely not be able to get rid of them.”  In addition she said, and I quote.  “If this continues and Germany re-opens its borders, I am going home to the Czech Republic.”

The question I have for you my friend is, where are ‘you’ going home to, when this comes to America.  And it will, unless you do something about it NOW!

Moreover if you think this is cruel or mean and that these poor people have a right to live too!  Then think again.  They have the same right that we do…to live in their own country and make it what they want it to be, just as our forefathers did in 1776 here in America.  The documented historical truth is that Muslims have destroyed every country they have lived in.  Because as you can see from the letter, Muslims are incompatible with any other society or culture in the world.   And they will destroy Europe, as well as America and they will make it their own. Because they do not, and cannot, and will not assimilate.

The proof is - that they have done this for more than 1400 years…moreover, they are not about to stop now.
   
Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom by sending this article to everyone you know and some you don’t know.  Then send it to your Representatives HERE! It’s the least you can do for your country. 

Thanks for listening my friend!    
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.


Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Gingrich, On The Deep State


“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

Gingrich, On The Deep State


By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted March 15, 2017


If you are a regular reader of mine, you will know that this is not the first time I have written about the existence of a powerful Shadow Government in America.  And sometimes resulting in a lot of conspiracy theory flack in return.

But now…finally someone from the Beltway with the guts to admit that there is in fact a Coup de tat. A Shadow Government that actually runs the country and maybe the world.

Former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich discussed the Deep State with White House Staffer Bannon.
The White House and its allies are stepping up their attacks on a foe typically associated with fragile third world regimes, military coups and a Tom Clancy spy thriller.
The "deep state," a shadowy network of powerful Communists and their “Useful Idiots” entrenched in Federal, and state governments, as well as in banking, independent regulatory agencies and military interests, has increasingly become the focus of Conservative Republicans who accuse such well-placed forces of trying to undermine the newly elected president.  Moreover I suggest that this is also due to the influence of the infiltration of Islam in government posts during the Islamic Obama Regime.
Though senior White House staff members don't use the exact label of the “Deep State” for fear of personal attack as I have had to endure, the notion behind it has taken hold. President Donald Trump claims his predecessor tapped his phone and America's intelligence agencies have conspired to leak harmful information to embarrass him. His chief strategist has vowed to dismantle the permanent Washington "administrative state." (Code for Deep State)  White House spokesman Sean Spicer says "people that burrowed into government are trying to sabotage the president.”
To Trump's critics, these assertions come off as paranoid fear of a non-existent shadow government and an effort to create a scapegoat for the White House's struggles. It’s called the demonization of truth.  But to Trump's supporters, this represents an overdue challenge to an elite ruling class concerned only with maintaining its own grasp on power.
"Of course, the deep state exists. There's a permanent state of massive bureaucracies that do whatever they want and set up deliberate leaks to attack the president," said Newt Gingrich, a Trump confidant. "This is what the deep state does: They create a lie, spread a lie, fail to check the lie and then deny that they were behind the lie."
Historians believe the concept of the "deep state" comes from Turkey, where the term "derin devlet" meant a clandestine network, a “State within a State,” including intelligence and military officers, which protected the ruling class in the 1920’s and the Turkish Ottoman Empire. Similar ideas have taken hold in Egypt where the revived Ottoman Empire in 1928 is now headquartered called the Muslim Brotherhood, and the military has allied itself with powerful business interests, in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, with its robust intelligence service.
In its current use, the concept has been twisted, broadened, and infiltrated encompassing a quiet resistant bureaucracy and a regulatory regime - rather than the foreshadowing of some sort of in your face violent Coup of military intervention. Chief Trump strategist Steve Bannon has offered the loudest warnings about the opposition the president is facing from the deep state.
In his only public speech since the election, Bannon told a conservative group that the White House's goal was the "deconstruction of the administrative state," (code for Shadow Government) a reflection of his belief that the massive federal government, with its burdensome regulations, does more to hinder than uplift citizens. It also echoes Bannon's oft-stated worldview, frequently on display at his former news site Breitbart, that a global power structure — including government institutions — has rigged the economy, referring to the Federal Reserve and the International Central Banking System controlled by the eight families of banking and the Rothschild’s.
Gingrich, who says he has discussed the deep state with Bannon, likens its dangers to the plotline of the new season of "Homeland," in which a conspiracy that includes career intelligence officers tries to subvert a president-elect. It seems that Hollywood may actually be way ahead of politics.
"They are fighting to keep hold of their power," said the former House speaker, who asked a reporter not to spoil the two Homeland episodes of the season he has not yet seen.
The sprawling federal government, including its intelligence agencies, has thousands of employees who predate Trump by decades, a mix of career staffers and those appointed by President Barack Obama whose replacements have yet to be named or approved. Some have offered leaks, including sensitive documents, to reporters that provide a critical take on the president.
Trump has rightly insinuated that those holdovers are working against him — even suggesting that leaks from intelligences agencies were reminiscent of smear tactics utilized by Nazi Germany. Moreover it is now becoming quite clear that he is absolutely correct.
Asked if the White House believes there is "a deep state that's actively working to undermine the president," Spicer guardedly said recently, "I don't think it should come as any surprise that there are people that burrowed into government during eight years of the last administration and, you know, may have believed in that agenda and want to continue to seek it."
Sean Hannity, a Fox News host who has close to ties to Trump, opened a show last week by claiming there are "deep state Obama holdover government bureaucrats who are hell-bent on destroying this president. It's time for the Trump administration to begin to purge these saboteurs before it's too late," Said Hannity.
Trump allies note that is customary for presidents to install loyalists and point to Abraham Lincoln's move to push out Southerners from the federal bureaucracy on the eve of the Civil War. The government has also gone through previous spasms of internal suspicion, most notably in the 1950s when Sen. Joseph McCarthy led a witch hunt to root out what he claimed were communist sympathizers supposedly trying to undermine Washington from within. It turns out that he was correct.
Experts ignorantly warn that Trump's attacks could lead to faster erosion of faith in government institutions.
"The more he talks about a deep state cabal against him, the less trust people will have in government," said Matthew Hale, a political science professor at Seton Hall University. "It's damaging to democracy."  Well it just supports my stand on education. It too is corrupt, professor’. To blindly trust the government is what has led to this Coup. Furthermore this country was never meant to be a democracy. Read the real history book, the one that records that America was meant to be a ‘Constitutional Free Representative Republic’, not a democracy.
Some of Trump's allies have, without evidence, the opposition says, seized upon Obama's decision to remain in Washington after leaving office as evidence that he is leading the resistance. The former president has said he is staying in the nation's capital until his youngest daughter finishes school, time will tell.
"He's only there for one purpose and one purpose only and that is to run a shadow government that is totally going to upset the new agenda," said Rep. Mark Kelly, a Pennsylvania Republican, at an event in his home district last week. His office later walked back the remarks, he too’, is afraid for his life.
THE BOTTOM LINE:  Several years ago I introduced this discovery of a Shadow Government and was yet again demonized by some of you as a conspiracy nut.  Many Presidents as well as other elected officials have been assassinated in the last 200 years by this very Shadow Government now referred to as the “DEEP STATE.”  Moreover, I don’t know what you think about the credibility of Newt Gingrich but he’, like myself is a student as well as a teacher of history.  And it’s been my experience that anyone who knows the truth of roads well-traveled, also can see what is down the road ahead.  
As I said at the beginning, finally someone credible from the Beltway with guts enough to admit that there is in fact a Coup de tat. A Shadow Government called “Deep State” that actually runs the country and by indirect means, the entire world.

“The further back one looks, the further forward one can see”- Sir Winston Churchill. 

Thanks for listening my friend!  Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Who Delineates Your Rights?

"The preservation of a free government requires, not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained, but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are TYRANTS. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them and are slaves..." -James Madison

Who Delineates Your Rights?

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted February, 2017

 
The latest Wiki-leak reminds us: "If you don't step up, then you're doomed to be stepped on."

If the governments or its courts don't respect your rights, does that mean that you don't have them? Or is it within the purview of the government or its courts to decide what rights you have, and therefore to authoritatively determine whether yours are being respected or not?

If the governments or its courts refuse to obey the Constitution, does that mean the Constitution is not the law? Or are the government and its courts the proper authorities to decide what the Constitution requires of them, and therefore to determine whether they are going to obey it or not?

If the governments or its courts treat words of the law as meaning something they don't say and demonstrably didn't mean when they were written (or as not meaning what they DO say), do those words then actually not mean what they say? Is everyone supposed to respectfully say, "Gee, I would have thought...? Oh, well… Guess I was mistaken..." No you weren’t.

I could ask these questions on a daily basis in regard to news from Washington and various state capitals with equal relevance. Today it is the latest Wikileaks whistleblowing that prompts these reflections.

Last week the heroic exposé organization revealed that the CIA has been engaged in an utterly despotic and downright psychopathic-creepy spying program involving invasions and data-seizures--or efforts to become capable of invading and plundering-- of and from every smart-phone in America (as well as other places.  The program even goes so far as to involve hidden remote switch-on-s of "smart"-TV microphones for the purpose of surreptitiously recording conversations in the homes of anyone with a susceptible device.
Understand that these are not tools needed for conducting legitimate, warranted surveillance on U.S. Citizens. Any legitimate, warranted surveillance has no need of broad, indiscriminate capabilities. These are tools to be used on our enemy. Are we, the citizens the enemy of this State? 

Legitimate, warranted surveillance is accomplished by the narrow application of court-approved, target-specific equipment or other tools. Broad, indiscriminate capability is only necessary for conducting broad, indiscriminate surveillance without authorization.

Further, the CIA's program pre-emptively-- and without the knowledge or approval of any court or any cause whatsoever-- puts its ears in everyone's house. This is done through a deliberate deception practiced upon every consumer, not one of whom would knowingly purchase the compromised device (or one capable of being compromised).

The program pre-emptively imposes nakedness upon a broad swath of people on the proposition that no one will look. We are to imagine that the saintly and law-respecting folks who work at the spy agency will forbear looking and listening through these pre-installed peepholes without gaining probable cause to do so in some other way, and then seeking and getting permission from an institutionally-skeptical higher authority.

The rationale and the mythology supporting it are B.S on steroids. There is no valid purpose for a program like this; the program's offense is complete before and without regard to whether anyone is actually spied upon. In its malicious essence, this program is indistinguishable from treating everyone worse than a dog.

BUT HEY! It's the government doing it, so must mean it's legal, right? At least necessary for National security.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)

What's more, this panopticon program is of the same character as the broad, Hooveristic NSA surveillance that has been approved in its indiscriminate darkness by the Illegal unconstitutional FISA courts and a couple of select congressional committees and the last several presidents, too. So, again, it must be what the law allows, right?

Well, that's actually going to be the unspoken functional conclusion, or underpinning, of most of the discourse concerning the illegal CIA peep-hole program. Some talk of the Fourth Amendment will take place but it won't amount to much, because too many Americans relinquish their power and responsibility and answer "Yes" to those six questions with which I began this commentary. I hope you won't do that.

I also urge you all to understand that what you read there is utterly unknown by pretty-much 100% of the lawyers who take on Fourth Amendment violations. More to the point, what you read there is utterly unknown by pretty-much 100% of the lawyers who don't take on Fourth Amendment violations, even when they have happened, because they don't know this material and therefore don't know that a violation has occurred.

The reason for that latter problem is that lawyers, more than any others, are conditioned to the rule-of-law-crushing habit of submissiveness to government and its courts as the determiners of what is and isn't the law. Lawyers are trained to answer "Yes" to each of the questions with which I began this commentary.

So, being victims of bad habits and deep conditioning, lawyers don't generally look past what the government and its courts have said when forming their own opinions of what is and is not actually the law. It's up to the rest of us to know the truth and set these folks straight.

The exposé of the CIA's malicious panopticon program offers a great chance for accomplishing that virtuous educational task. Send this material to everyone that you know, especially "public interest" and "Constitutional" law firms.
Remind these folks of a truth Thomas Jefferson articulated on all our behalf:

"A free people claim their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Moreover, there isn't likely to be a judge in the country who knows the truth about the Fourth Amendment any more than the lawyers do. Don’t forget they all went to the same Communist Universities. Nor are there any journalists who know it, even though the Fourth Amendment and the government's various illegal search and seizure practices will be the subjects of much scribbling for a while now, as it has been many times before.  And then if you let it, it will disappear into the deep shadow government archives and die.

The judges may not be very accessible for education except when cases begin being brought before them by lawyers who have become able to knowledgeably brief the subject. But some journalists can be able to be made aware just from having an ear to the ground, if the ground has a bit of a knowing buzz going on. You can make that happen, if you'll do some buzzing.

“No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.”- John Jay, First chief justice US Supreme Court.

AND…

“No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.”- John Jay, First Chief Justice US Supreme Court.

Let’s face it, without knowing and understanding the history behind the law, one can’t know the law.  One can only use the law for one’s own agenda.

Thanks for listening my friend!  Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.