Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama…Not a Muslim? Muslims Think So…

Muslims all over the world believe that Barrack Hussein Obammah is a Muslim.

By de Andréa

“While Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama has tried to push his Muslim origins into the background, his ‘Islamic roots’ have won him a place in many a Muslim heart.”

That’s the observation of Persian/Iranian-born commentator Amir Taheri, whose column in Tuesday’s New York Post notes that Muslims see Obama as “one of them.”

They see that Obama has Arabic-Islamic names: Barack means “blessed” and Hussein means “beautiful.” His last name is Swahili, an East African language based on the Arabic language. Taheri writes. Barack’s sister is named Oumah, Arabic for “the community of the faithful;” Barack’s own daughter Malia bears the name of a daughter of the noted Caliph Othman; and his father and stepfather were both Muslims.

Although Taheri did not note it, Obama was raised as a Muslim when he lived in the Muslim country of Indonesia with his mother and stepfather. While there, he studied at two schools and was registered at both as a Muslim student.

As such he received Islamic religious instruction, studied the Koran, and prayed with other students, and attended mosque, with his stepfather.

Obama’s religious upbringing after Indonesia is somewhat of a mystery until his late 20s. At that point, Obama says he converted to Christianity after meeting the Rev. Jeremiah Wright in Chicago. This is interesting because Jeremiah Wright is a Malcolm X Muslim, and preaches a religion of hate disguised as Christianity. This is why Wright wants god to damn America, his god Allah. .

Obama has maintained strong support from American Muslims, including Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam movement. Farrakhan has endorsed Obama and has called him the Muslim “Messiah.” Meaning the Twelfth Caliphate of the Nation of Islam.

These factors have made Obama a big hit in the Arab world, where he has received wide praise, including: The Syrian regime that has indicated its preference for Obama.

Buthaina Shaaban, an adviser to President Bashar al-Assad, has written: “The change suggested by Obama is essential not only for the U.S. but for the entire human family.”

The Muslim world knows exactly what that word “Change” means. To a Muslim it means conversion and subjugation to Islam.

Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi called Obama “a Muslim” and said: “All the people in the Arab and Muslim world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcome him and pray for his success.”
.
Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said this year: “We like Mr. Obama and we hope that he will win the election.”

Hezbollah’s second in command, Sheik Naim al-Kassim, urged Americans to vote for Obama as a step toward peace with Islam, and pro-Hezbollah columnist Amal Saad-Ghorayeb said there is “no doubt Arabs should welcome an Obama presidency,” according to Taheri.

In Saudi Arabia, commentator Hussein Shobokshi wrote that an Obama presidency “would mark an important moral transformation in the superpower and is an indicator of the long-awaited improvement in the international arena.” (Emphasis mine)

Some columnists also have noted Obama’s close ties to several Palestinian radicals, including Columbia University Prof. Rashid Khalidi — former communications director for the Palestinian Liberation Organization — and another Palestinian political activist, the late Edward Said, said “the Arab street also favors Obama. Recent surveys found that he is the preferred candidate in Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Algeria, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates just to name a few”.

THE BOTTOM LINE: You may not believe that Obama is a Muslim but it is obvious that the Nation of Islam believes that he is a Muslim. The Bible says: ‘Paraphrased’ Train up a child and point him in the direction that he should go and he will not depart from it. With the direction that Obama has been pointed in as a child, where do you think he will go?

And he will not depart from it…

de Andréa

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Is Obama a natural born American???

His Grandmama says she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombassa, Kenya.

By de Andréa

One would think since it is U.S. Constitutional law that a Presidential candidate must be a ‘natural born’ citizen under Article II, Section 1, that the burden of proof of proper U.S. citizenship would fall on the candidate, apparently not in Obama’s case. Read about the Supreme Court decision.

Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits, according to Rush Limbaugh, Barrack’s birth mother has requested that Hawaii's Governor Linda Lingle place the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instruct the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances.

One can hardly help but wonder; what Obama is trying to hide???

Dr. Corsi, author of The ObasmaNation is not within any of the categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response seeking the information.

Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. In case you didn’t notice even though it is Federal Constitutional law even Congress is not on that list.

The official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision designed to prevent identity theft. Is the Governor really afraid that someone would be crazy enough to steal Barrack Hussein Obammah’s Identity? Still, sources said confidentially, the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the sources refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama.

The sources also refused to answer questions whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital-generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth.

The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.

Also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barrack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4."

In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, many birth notices were published between one to as many as three weeks after the date of birth listed the hospital and the doctor who delivered the baby.

The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser however does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby.In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reported she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombassa, Kenya.

A U.S. Federal judge Richard Barclay Surrick, a Clinton appointee, dismissed a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Phillip J. Berg who alleged Obama was not a U.S. "natural born" citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency under the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, under Article II, Section 1. Watch a video by Phillip Berg.

In Kenya, the government authorities said that all documents concerning Obama were under seal until after the U.S. presidential election on November 4.

The Obama campaign website entitled "Fight the Smears" posts a state of Hawaii "Certificate of Live Birth"(see the document) which is obviously not the original birth certificate generated by the hospital where Obama reportedly was born. First of all there is no certificate number, and then in 1961 the designation of race would have been Negro not African American or the continent of origin.

Although the Obama campaign could immediately put an end to all the challenges by simply producing the candidate's original birth certificate, it has not done so. And the "Fight the Smears" website offers no explanation as to why Obama has refused to request, and make public, an original hospital-generated birth certificate which the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not possess.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One could drive oneself crazy trying to figure out why Barrack Hussein Obammah has tried to cover up, deny, or otherwise distance himself from his background and unsavory friends. Is he a Muslim, a Communist, a sleeper terrorist, or a socialist? One only needs to ask oneself why these issues are even connected to a presidential candidate. At best his background and associations and obvious cover-up for whatever reason are questionable, which should be enough to cause distrust in him with the most important and powerful job in the world.

At least one would think so...

de Andréa

Monday, October 27, 2008

What Is An “Islamophobe” Anyway?

By de Andréa

For the past twenty one years or so, I have studied the history and theocracy of Islam and for the past four years, I have been writing to the world in an effort to inform people about the threat of this radical murderous oppressive nation. Moreover as a result, I have often been accused by some of my readers, of “hate speech” and “Islamophobia,” as well as having my life and the lives of my family threatened by Muslims, if they should ever find me.

I have been described not only as racists but an “Islamophobe,” and worse, a “radical Islamophobe.” This made me question what those terms really mean. What is the difference between “hate speech” and “free speech”? What is “Islamophobia” and will the real “Islamophobes” please stand up.

As for being a racists, my accusers again haven’t a clue what a Muslims is. I’ve got news for you ignorant judges, Islam may be a Nation, but it is not a race of people. It is however an oppressive theocracy, made up of nearly two billion supremacist brainwashed people of nearly all the races of the planet. “Hate speech” verses “free speech” is easy to define. All over the United States, so-called “progressive” individuals and politically correct multicultural groups berate America and Israel and in the process tell outrageous lies about both countries. This is called “free speech.” While others, including me, tell the truth about the threat of Islam it is labeled as “hate speech” by many of these who call themselves “progressives”.

But what is “hate speech” and what is “Islamophobia”? When I describe the threat presented by Islam, I quote chapter and verse from the Koran and authoritative classical Islamic sources. When I describe the worldwide campaign of Islamist hate indoctrination against the West, and the mind-numbing mass violence committed and glorified by Muslims world wide, when I write about the infiltration of Islamic doctrine into the schools of America and into the minds of our children, I am relaying facts that have been published by print and electronic media outlets all over the world. Do the facts about Islamist supremism manifest “hatefulness?” And if so; is the “Hate crime” perpetrated by the messenger or those the messenger writes about?

It is not my fault that the truth about Islamist supremacist teachings and edicts promote hate. I wish they didn’t. But wishing or excusing or cowing down to it, doesn’t make it go away. The Koran explicitly tells Muslims to hate --terrorize, subdue, oppress, and slaughter the unbeliever until Islam is supreme in the world: "Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I am with you. Give firmness to the Believers. I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.’” (Koran 8:12)

The Koran explicitly preaches that Christians and Jews are descended from monkeys, apes, and pigs. In more than the 13 centuries since the emergence of Islam, this strict Islamic dogma has never been abrogated, amended, or ameliorated. It is the Koran and ‘its writer’ that is guilty of “hate speech.” I am merely a messenger exposing this hate.

This brings us to “Islamophobia” and “radical Islamophobes.” According to the dictionary, the suffix “-phobe” comes from the Latin phobos, which means “fearing.” Do I fear radical Islam? You bet. And you should too. Do any of these locales ring a bell? London subways, Madrid train stations, Bali night clubs, Beslan elementary school. They are all locations of horrendous terrorist atrocities committed by terrorist Muslims, with scores of civilian fatalities and hundreds maimed. I can name hundreds of other such locales, from all over the world including our own Twin Towers and Pentagon. If fearing radical Islamist terror makes me an “Islamophobe,” then I am an “Islamophobe” in its healthiest manifestation. In light of all, and especially recent history, I submit that it would be (at least) ignorant, and (at best) foolhardy to be otherwise.

Things get a little more complicated when we get to “Islamophobia.” The dictionary defines a “phobia” as “an exaggerated, usually inexplicable, and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.” Anyone who thinks that my fear of Islam is “exaggerated,” “inexplicable” and/or “illogical” then one is grossly misinformed and ignorant. Moreover, you are invited to take a terrorism tour through the hundred or so documented articles on this site, and or read some of the suggested books, which I submit as evidence from a personal and factual level. If exaggeration or illogic are required elements in the definition, then my fear of radical Islam is NOT “Islamophobia.”

If that was not sufficiently complicated, when used as a suffix “-phobia” can include “intolerance or aversion for” the object of the phobia. Yes, I am intolerant of mass murder, justified and glorified in the name of Allah? Yes, I am. Do I have an aversion to subway and train bombings? Yes, I do. Am I against oppression, intimidation, and perversion? Yes I am. Then according to that definition, my fear of radical Islam would be “Islamophobia.” However, if my intolerance of mass murder and my aversion to nightclub bombings makes me a “Islamophobe,” then I submit that my so-called “Islamophobia” is fully justified and logical and therefore not a phobia in the usual sense of the word.

The next question must be…: what distinguishes a “radical” Islamophobe from a run-of-the-mill, middle of the road, warm fuzzy Islamophobe? Perhaps they should be distinguished by how their Islamophobia affects their behavior. My “Islamophobia” motivates me to stand up and speak out against the threat of Islam in my country. My “Islamophobia” motivates me to tell-the-truth. This definitely makes me a “radical.”

Examples of conventional Islamophobes abound. Their fear of Islam motivates them to censor themselves in the face of Muslim threats and intimidation. This, my friend, is just how much Islam has infiltrated this culture already, and they will continue to do so unless they are stopped.

The best-known example of the craven failure of the major American media to stand up for freedom of the press; is during the Muhammad cartoon controversy. Anyone who will read this will be familiar with the story. There was much hand washing and wringing out of the story in the media about freedom of speech, but only three newspapers in the United States had the guts, or nicely put, the journalistic integrity to print the cartoons in solidarity with the Danish newspaper which originally printed them. Only one newspaper in the United States actually had the integrity to admit that they were not printing the cartoons because of “fear of retaliation from . . . bloodthirsty Islamists who seek to impose their will on those who do not believe as they do….” The rest declined to do so, usually offering as their rationale that the cartoons were “offensive,” and they were being “respectful” of Muslim “sensitivity.” Should we have been more respectful of Nazi sensitivity in the 1940’s??? Approximately two dozen periodicals in 13 European countries ran the Muhammad cartoons, “insisting that they will not allow thugs to decide what a free press can publish.

”The New York Times itself dutifully reported on various European newspapers printing the Muhammad cartoons in solidarity with and support of the Danish newspaper. The Times could have taken the hint and printed the cartoons, but was apparently oblivious to the irony of being taught a lesson in freedom of the press by a bunch of Europeans. Instead, the Times’ fear of Islam, its Islamophobia, caused the great Grey Lady of the Fourth Estate, the most respected voice in American print media, to roll over and play dead. This is dangerous, craven Islamophobia and cowardice-ness in the face of the enemy. . .

And the Times is still playing dead. It has failed to report adequately on an even more egregious and harmful example of Islamophobia afflicting the American publishing industry. Random House for example, has just cancelled the publication of a book about one of Muhammad’s wives explicitly because of fear of a violent Muslim reaction. The major American media outlets, both print and electronic, have absorbed the lessons of the Muhammad cartoon riots, and the Salman Rushdie affair, and the slaughter of Theo Van Gogh, etc., etc. They are intimidated into silence by their Islamophobia. They’ve become like slaves, so… accustomed to the feel of the lash that they flinch at the mere thought of their master raising his hand. No one rings the alarm at the Times when a major American publishing house cancels publication of a book because they fear Muslim rioting. This had been the mistake and the downfall of England, and unless we demand the truth it will be the demise of American Culture as well.

Am I afraid of those Muslims who use the Koran as justification for murder and terrorism? I already admitted that I am. Maybe that makes me a “radical Islamophobe.” But am I not cowed by my fear of radical Islamists. I will continue to stand up and tell the truth.

Will anyone on the staff of the New York Times admit that they fear radical Islam, and that they are cowed by their fear? Most certainly not. On the contrary, they would probably protest loudly that the opposite is true. But their actions, and their editorial policy, speak louder than their protestations. They are also Islamophobes, but of the worst type, they are cowards.

I write under the synonym or pen name of de Andréa to protect the lives and members of my family who are not responsible or who may not agree with what I write. But I continue to write… even though I have been threatened by members of CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other terrorist organizations. One of the more mild threats I have received is…”if they find me, they will hang me up side down, cut my throat and bleed me out, like the pig that I am This is right out of the Koran my friend.

If I were a New York Times Islamophobe, instead of a Bottom Line Islamophobe, I could no longer say… I come from the land of the free and the home of the brave

THE BOTTOM LINE: If people like me are to be ignorantly labeled Islamophobes or a racists, then so-be- it. But as for me, I will, as long as I am physically and mentally able, I will print the truth, whether it be labeled as hate speech, racists or political incorrect.

"In the beginning of change the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. If his cause should succeed, the cowards join him, for then it costs them nothing to be a patriot.” -- Mark Twain

de Andréa

Friday, October 24, 2008

Some of the Accusations About Obama’s Past, Have Documented Proof

The Obama campaign says its candidate is a victim of “smears” — and has a Web site to fight such attacks.

By de Andréa

Several investigations find that many of the so-called Obama smears are based in truth — and the Obama campaign uses half-truths, clever language, and ad homonym attacks to spin the facts.

Obama’s www.FightTheSmears.com focuses mainly on anti-Obama messages being repeated on the Internet and talk radio, the only media where Obama's ideological allies and spin-misters are not dominant.

Who’s Behind the Smears?
On his site, visitors can see a chart naming seven groups and six individuals with lines that suggest multiple, sinister connections between them.

The people and groups named are real and are members of Washington’s small but significant conservative sphere of power and influence. The Obama conspiracy chart links all of these conservative individuals and groups back to the critics who dogged the “Clinton 1992 Campaign.”

This may come as something of a surprise but back in the Hillary Clinton campaign, many of the so-called “smears” against Obama first surfaced during her heated primary contest with him.

If one were to review 12 random claims and related rebuttals posted on Obama’s ever-changing FightTheSmears.com to gauge their veracity. Here’s what I found:

Documented truth No. 1:
Obama's campaign is funded by the rich, big corporations and foreigners, in some cases terrorists and terrorist’s organizations:

Claim: “Barack Obama was the only major presidential candidate this year to completely reject contributions from The Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs that have dominated our politics for years,” the Obama site says of the persistent online criticisms of its fundraising.

“Instead, this campaign has been owned by the more than 3.1 million everyday Americans who have donated in small amounts.”

Truth: Not so, according to campaign finance records. Nearly half of the $600 million raised by Obama to date has come from wealthy donors and special interests. Obama's allies’ months ago dropped their ad linking Republican rival “Exxon John” McCain to Big Oil after it came to light that Obama had taken far more money from Exxon-Mobil than McCain.

Claim: “The Obama campaign has complied fully with federal election law, including donor eligibility and contribution disclosure requirements.”

Truth: However, one giant loophole the politicians wrote into the law allows contributions in amounts of $200 or less with no donor identification. Obama claims that $300 million in campaign funds was given by these small donors, and he won’t release their names and addresses. Several contributions have come from Libya, and Palestine.

McCain on the other hand, has released his whole donor database, including those who have contributed less than $200.

Documented truth No. 2:
Obama has had a close, ongoing relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.

Claim: The Obama site acknowledges that its candidate and Ayers”served on the board of an education-reform organization in the mid-1990s,” but maintains most stories about the links between Obama and Ayers are phony or exaggerated.

Truth: It does not mention that Obama and Ayers worked together on the board distributing millions of dollars with the aim of radicalizing Chicago schoolchildren. Nor does the site acknowledge that Obama kicked off his first political campaign in the living room of Ayers, the former Weather Underground leader. (Obama is currently saying it was not the first event. There is no dispute that one of Obama’s first political events in his first run for public office was held in Ayers’ home.)

There is also no dispute the Weather Underground bombed the Pentagon the Capitol, the home of a New York Supreme Court justice, and a police station, among other targets.

FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who infiltrated the group, says Ayers taught him how to make bombs and saying, “In the revolution, some innocent people need to die.”

Claim: “Smear groups and now a desperate McCain campaign are trying to connect Barack to William Ayers using age-old guilt by association techniques . . .” says the Obama Web site.

Truth: Actually, McCain and Obama critics are questioning why Obama would continue to associate with a man who, as recently as 2001, said he did not do enough and wished he had bombed more.

Conservatives also note that if Ayers had bombed abortion clinics, the liberal media would brand him a pariah forever. What does it tell us about the liberal media’s and Obama’s judgment and values that they see nothing wrong with embracing unrepentant terrorist Ayers today?

Documented truth No. 3:
Obama takes advice from executives of troubled mortgage backer Fannie Mae.

Claim: “John McCain started smearing Obama about non-existent ties to Fannie Mae in some of his deceptive attack ads,” says FightTheSmears.com.

Truth: The site downplays connections between Obama and two former heads of the giant mortgage-backing institution — James A. Johnson and Franklin D. Raines — whose corruption played a key role in the current financial crisis.

An editorial in the Aug. 27, 2008, Washington Post described Johnson and Raines, as “members of Mr. Obama’s political circle.” Raines advised the Obama campaign on housing matters. Obama chose Johnson to select his vice presidential running mate. But because neither are advising Obama today, this Web site’s present-tense claim that he “doesn’t [not didn’t] take advice from Fannie Mae execs” is technically, and deceptively, true.

Johnson also reportedly helped raise as much as $500,000 for Obama’s campaign.
And despite Obama’s lack of seniority in the U.S. Senate, he pocketed more than $105,000 in political contributions, the third-highest amount given to any lawmaker, directly from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Obama’s Web site leaves all this unmentioned.

Documented truth No. 4:
Obama has close ties with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a group suspected of massive voter registration fraud.

Claim: Obama’s site says the candidate was never an ACORN employee and that ACORN “was not part of Project Vote, the successful voter registration drive [Obama] ran in 1992.”

In defending Obama, the site resorts to smearing former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell — calling him a “discredited Republican voter-suppression guru” — for daring to fight the voter fraud so often associated with operatives of ACORN, among the largest radical groups in the United States.

Truth: As documented in a Newsmax article ["Clever Obama Tries To Bury ACORN Past,"] Obama’s Web site is attempting to deceive when it says Obama was never “hired” to work as a trainer for ACORN’s leaders. In fact, he did the work for free from at least 1993 until 2003.

ACORN spokesman Lewis Goldberg acknowledges in the Oct. 11, 2008, New York Times that Obama trained ACORN leaders. And Obama worked as a lawyer for ACORN.

As to heading up Project Vote in Illinois, Obama said during a speech to ACORN leaders last November, "[When] I ran the Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack-dab in the middle of it.”

Veteran journalist Karen Tumulty described Project Vote in the Oct. 18, 2004, issue of Time magazine as “a nonpartisan arm of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now” after interviewing its national director.

The co-founder of ACORN, former Students for a Democratic Society official Wade Rathke, described Project Vote as one of ACORN’s “family of organizations.”
Over the years, ACORN and its front groups, like the one Obama ran in Illinois, have illegally registered more than 4 million voters. When authorities in Virginia checked ACORN registrations, it found that 83 percent were either fraudulent or in their words, had problems. This, in theory, could mean ACORN may have created the opportunity for stealing more than 3.3 million votes in this November’s election, a margin far wider than that by which Obama is likely to win.

Documented truth No. 5:
Obama has shown only wavering and deceptive support for individual gun-ownership rights.

Claim: “During Barack’s career in the Illinois and United States Senates, he proudly stood to defend the rights of hunters and sportsmen,” says Obama’s Web site, “while doing everything he could to protect children — including his own two daughters — from illegal gun violence.”

But the National Rifle Association, it continues, “is distributing a dishonest and cowardly flyer that makes confrontational accusations and runs away from verifying them.”

Truth: Actually, the NRA does a meticulous job of laying out documentation, as Newsmax reported in September ["NRA to Fight Obama Over Gun Rights Flip-Flops,"] to show that Obama has supported handgun confiscation; the handgun ban in Washington, D.C.; a virtual ban on high-powered rifle ammunition; and many other draconian restrictions on Second Amendment rights.
If elected, wrote the NRA, Obama “would be the most anti-gun president in American history.”

Documented truth No. 6:
A fervent supporter of abortion rights, Obama supports all abortions including late-term and partial-birth abortions, described as infanticide.

Claim: The Obama Web site dismisses such criticism as the work of “radical anti-abortion ideologues running ads against Barack.”

Truth: But as an Illinois state senator, Obama voted repeatedly against legislation to protect infants who, during a late-term abortion, were “born alive.” Such protection, he has argued, already exists in Illinois; it does, but is subject to the abortionist’s decision whether such an infant has a good likelihood of survival.

Nurses have reported instances in Illinois and elsewhere in which surviving aborted babies were left by abortionists to die without water, food, or warmth.

Obama’s Web site notes that even the Republican author of one of these bills, former state Sen. Rick Winkel, has written that “none of those who voted against [his bill] favored infanticide.” This is true, but Obama’s site does not quote the rest of Winkel’s statement: “[T]heir zeal for pro-choice dogma was clearly the overriding force behind their negative votes rather than concern that my bill would protect babies who are born alive.”

Obama has a 100 percent pro-abortion voting record according to NARAL Pro-Choice America; his rating from the National Right to Life Committee is zero.

How extreme is Obama on this issue? In the U.S. Senate, he has voted against bills that would prohibit minors from crossing state lines for abortion without parental notification.
"Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” Obama has said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."

Documented truth No. 7:
Obama showed little interest or support for American combat troops during his overseas visits.

Doubts about Obama’s true support for the military cropped up during a campaign trip to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Europe.

A widely circulated e-mail, penned by Army Capt. Jeffrey S. Porter, described Obama's visit to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan: “As the Soldiers lined up to shake his hand, he blew them off . . . He again shunned the opportunity to talk to soldiers to thank them for their service . . . I swear we got more thanks from the NBA basketball players or the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders than from [Obama].”

Porter later recanted, sending a follow-up e-mail that said, in part: “After checking my sources, information that was put out in my e-mail was wrong.” He did not specify which information was wrong, leading Obama skeptics to suspect that this officer has been disciplined by his superiors.

Heading home, Obama touched down in Germany, where he “was scheduled to visit the American hospitals at Ramstein and Landstuhl.” But as The Washington Post reported, Obama “canceled the trips after being told by Pentagon officials that he could only visit in his official capacity as a senator, not as a candidate” and could not have his visits with hospitalized soldiers videotaped by the media.

Prominent liberal mainstream media reporters such as NBC’s Andrea Mitchell rushed to defend Obama, saying that the press had never planned to cover his visits to military sickbeds. But Obama canceled both visits and used his free time instead to shoot hoops, with the media recording his best shots.

Documented truth No. 8:
Barack Obama is a Muslim.

Claim: FightTheSmears.com states bluntly that Obama is a Christian, not a follower of Islam. In fact, Barack Hussein Obama’s Kenyan father was raised Muslim, though he reportedly was not religious.

Truth: His mother divorced his father and married yet another Muslim from Indonesia. As a youngster in Indonesia, Barack Obama attended two schools and was registered at both as a Muslim. He received religious instruction in both schools as a Muslim, including studying the Quran and the Hadith. According to a childhood friend, Obama attended services at a local mosque.

Obama’s Muslim upbringing has been detailed in a 2007 Los Angeles Times report (reprinted in The Baltimore Sun) headlined "Islam an Unknown Factor in Obama Bid." Middle East expert Daniel Pipes has studied the question of Obama’s Muslim faith and says he is “lying” when he says he was never a Muslim.

It is important to note that Obama’s Web site does not now say he was never a Muslim. But in the past, Obama’s site and FightTheSmears.com did make the claim Obama was never a Muslim. Since that claim is obviously false, it is no longer used.

Obama says he became a Christian in his late 20s. He now describes himself as Christian. Even though, he spent two decades as a member of a Chicago United Church of Christ congregation that embraces Black Liberation theology, the Chicago UCC church preaches elements of neo-Marxist class warfare. Moreover, it combines these radical socialist elements with black Islam Obama’s mentor and the man he called his “Uncle” Jeremiah Wright wears the typical Black Muslim Tunic and the Muslim Cap called the “Taqiyyah” which is another Arabic word for True-Lies or deception. The cap symbolically covers the deception of Islam.

Documented truth No. 9:
Obama was born outside the United States and is ineligible for the presidency.

Claim: The Obama Web site dismisses the claim that the candidate was born anywhere but in the United States as “completely false” and “groundless.”

As proof, the Obama’s campaign has produced a “certificate of live birth” from Hawaii indicating that Barack Hussein Obama II was born Aug. 4, 1961.

Truth: Critics, however say the document could have easily been forged or falsified and is not a substitute for a certified birth certificate.

No reporter has been allowed to see the original certificate of live birth or its certificate number, which is blacked out on copies of it on the Obama site.

Skeptics note that Obama’s “Father’s Race” is identified on this document as “African,” a geographic and modern politically correct term rather than a 1961 racial designation. The standard term used on American birth certificates until the U.S. Census changed it in 1980 would have been “Negro.”

Former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, Philip J. Berg, has filed a lawsuit to force Obama to produce a certified copy of his birth certificate. According to Berg, Obama’s paternal grandmother has said she was present at his birth in Kenya, after which his mother promptly returned with her baby to the United States and had him registered as being born in Hawaii. There is no record in any Hawaiian Hospital in 1961 or any other time of Obama’s birth. .

Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be president.

Documented truth No. 10
As president, Obama would raise taxes dramatically for most Americans.

Millions of Americans recognize that Obama is likely to raise taxes. But like a good conjurer, who tricks you into watching his right hand while doing things with his left, the Obama Web site assures readers with a red herring.

Claim: The Illinois senator will not tax your water, as claimed in some fringe e-mails, FightTheSmears.com maintains.

Truth: What Obama will do, however, is tax businesses and capital gains more heavily, even though America already has the world’s second-highest business taxes.

“Now our opponents tell you not to worry about their tax increases” said former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson at the 2008 Republican National Convention. “They tell you they are not going to tax your family. No, they’re just going to tax businesses! So unless you buy something from a business, like groceries or clothes or gasoline . . . or unless you get a paycheck from a big or a small business, don’t worry. It’s not going to affect you.”

During his campaign, Obama has promised to raise various taxes that will fall on most economic classes, including the dividend tax, the FICA tax cap, the capital gains tax, the estate tax, and new taxes on gasoline.

He also called for the Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010, which will automatically raise taxes on most Americans. By letting the Bush cuts expire, Obama would produce a $2 trillion tax increase that some economists predict will rumble through the already weakened economy like an earthquake.

Documented truth No. 11:
Obama would all but disband the American Military.

Obama has said reputedly that he would suspend all new weaponry for the U.S. military as well as do away with America’s nuclear arsenal making us a friendlier nation.

Documented truth No. 12
Obama is not just a Extremist Liberal Democrat he is a member of the 'N.P.' the New Party an American Socialists Party. 'Read the Story'

THE BOTTOM LINE: A friendlier nation??? I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to be a friendly nation…I want to be a ‘Free Nation’

Even if there were no document evidence that the aforementioned documented truths were true, one would think that there would at least be an official congressional investigation into the source of these allegations. But there isn’t, nary a one.

Ever wonder why Obama is so clever with his lies??? One word, “Taqiyyah”.
If it walks like a duck…

Cover-up anyone… anyone…

de Andrea

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

More on TIZA


No, it has not gone away, the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy is a Muslim public school, and yes, it is American taxpayer supported.

By de Andréa

You may remember my previous articles on this Issue; the last one involved a physical confrontation between the schools Islamic madrassa and a freelance independent op-ed writer like yours truly.

In the following article written by KATHERINE KERSTEN, Star Tribune, titled

“Storm brewing between state officials and Muslim school”
she includes some background but mostly what is currently going on at TIZA, trust me it is more of the same infiltration for the advancement of Islam’s agenda to change your country and your way of life.

She writes…

“Last week, Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TiZA) and the Minnesota Department of Education appeared to reach an understanding in the controversy over whether Islam is being promoted at this public school.
But behind the scenes, a storm may be brewing.
TiZA officials have "taken a confrontational road" in discussions with the department, according to Deputy MDE Commissioner Chas Anderson, the department's No. 2 official.
Anderson says that the two sides have not yet reached an agreement on one key issue and that MDE will be closely monitoring TiZA's performance in future months.

TiZA is a K-8 charter public school in Inver Grove Heights Minnesota, financed by taxpayers. Its students have scored well on standardized tests. But like all public schools, it may not encourage or endorse religion, or favor one religion over another.
A number of facts raise questions about TiZA on this score. Its executive director, Asad Zaman, is an imam, or Muslim religious leader. The school shares a building with a mosque and the Minnesota chapter of the Muslim American Society, which the Chicago Tribune has described as the American branch of the Muslim Brotherhood -- "the world's most influential Islamic fundamentalist group.
" Most of TiZA's students are Muslim, many from low-income immigrant families. The school breaks daily for prayer, its cafeteria serves halal food (permissible under Islamic Sharia law), and Arabic is a required subject.
School buses do not leave until after-school Muslim Studies classes, which most students attend, have ended for the day.

Last spring, MDE opened an investigation after press reports raised questions about whether TiZA has been blurring the church/state line. The investigation focused on the school's 30-minute Friday communal prayer event, among other issues. The service -- led by adults -- has been conducted on school premises, and both students and teachers have attended.

In a report issued in May, the MDE concluded that TiZA's Friday prayer event violated the law and since then has been working with the school to make changes.

"We wanted TiZA to do Friday prayers the way all other public schools" handle similar activities -- "as release time, under state law," said Anderson. In a release-time arrangement, students move off-site for religious activities.

But TiZA said no, according to Anderson. Instead, the school will continue to hold Friday prayer on its premises. Students will lead prayer and staff will be present only "to ensure student safety," said Zaman in a letter to the MDE.

In a response to Zaman's letter, Anderson wrote complaining of what she called the "defensive tone" of the letter in which he set forth the school's intentions. "It is inaccurate for TiZA to imply that MDE's legal concerns regarding the school's operations ... were unfounded," she wrote, "and it is of utmost importance that TiZA take seriously its responsibility to comply with applicable state and federal laws."

TiZA now says it will shorten Friday prayers -- whose length has been a potential concern because of instructional time requirements -- though it has not said by how much.

MDE has agreed that TiZA's new arrangement on after-school bus transportation will bring the school into legal compliance on that issue. But the department is highly skeptical that TiZA's proposed arrangement for on-site, student-led Friday prayers will work.

We are "very troubled by it," said Anderson in an interview. "This may look good on paper. But how can you have an assembly with older students in charge of younger students?" she said. MDE plans to track the situation closely and conduct site visits.

Asked to respond to MDE's continuing concerns, the school issued a statement through spokesman Blois Olson saying: "TiZA Academy has reached agreement with the Department of Education ... and will continue to work with the department to ensure that we continue to be in compliance with all state and federal laws."

While TiZA and the department don't agree about the Friday prayer service -- even over whether they have an agreement on it -- there are other religious accommodations at the school that raise questions. In its May report, for example, MDE said that regularly scheduled daily prayers at TiZA appear to pass legal muster because they are "voluntary and student-led."

But imagine the reaction if prayer time -- reflecting only one faith -- were built into the schedule at, say, Stillwater Junior High.

Asked if other public schools would be allowed to accommodate religion the way that TiZA accommodates Islam, Anderson said: "We sought guidance, we want guidance" from federal sources and the Minnesota attorney general, "but no one will give us a black and white answer."

MDE says there are broader questions at issue. "This upcoming legislative session may be an appropriate forum" for "a serious discussion about the appropriateness of sectarian organizations sponsoring publicly-funded nonsectarian charter schools in the first place," said Anderson in a statement Monday.

For now, she added, "This is a gray area. School authorities at TiZA know it's a gray area, and they are walking right up to and over that line."

*************

THE BOTTOM LINE: Unlike me-- as a typical modern American journalist Katherine can not bleed over into opinion, or for that matter write the absolute truth. She is not only bound by the rules of journalism but the special rules of her employer. There is however a third area of concern especially when it comes to writing about Islam. And that is, one must not cross the line and really, really write the truth about Islam because you might unleash all the money in Saudi Arabia on the lawyers of America and anyone who even looks like a lawyer will want to get his hands on their share. The result, even if you are legally correct, is that you will likely find yourself and your family for generations to come, at the very least homeless, and in debt, or worse yet, you could suddenly be counted as one of the many growing number of missing persons in America. “Without A Trace”

This is what Katherine would write if she wasn’t intimidated by her employer or Islam, the enemy of this world.

It is through intimidation and fear that Islam infiltrates and eventually controls its host nation. This is called “Cultural Jihad” it is the precursor for the violent militant Jihad that inevitably follows.

The struggle between TIZA and the Public School District of the Minnesota Department of Education has been going on for years now. And the truth is it hasn’t changed one bit.

The truth about TIZA is that it is a K-8 primary Islamic madrassa, which means it is a terrorist indoctrination school for children. At ages 5 or 6, it is the time one must begin the deceptive brainwashing of young future terrorists to support the coming militant Jihad in America.

TIZA is not the first or the only Islamic public school in the U.S. it is just the most in your face one of many such schools across this country. There are also hundreds of existing public schools in every State that have indoctrinating our kids to the agenda and philosophy of Islam, subtly and surreptitiously through the introduction of new deceptively and subtly perverted text books.

The problem here is, as always, we as people of the western culture have no cognitive understanding of Islam. Islam does not compromise, Muslims are taught that compromise, or benevolence is a weakness. Couple that with the Muslim belief of supremacy and you have been exposed to the results of the rigid agenda of Islam. They do not subjugate themselves to your rules; you are in subjection to their rules no matter what or where, period…. (Sharia Law)

The only solution to dealing with this issue is to just cut off their funds, period. No negotiations, no empty threats, or empty promises to comply, because they will not.

This will be an interesting issue to follow, because as TIZA goes, so will go the Nation. If TIZA is not completely shut down, then this will be the foundation of the not so future Islamic State of America.

Remember the philosophy of: The education of your children determines the future culture of your country. And today the direction of education is the oppressive theocracy of Islam.

“And then, all will be at peace, under the sword of Sharia.”

What simple thing can you do -- to help those unsung heroes that are fighting right now for your survival and the survival of your country? It’s easy, see below…

Act for America
If you haven’t already done so, then do yourself and your family a favor, educate yourselves about Islam and the Constitution… The quickest, easiest, and least expensive way to get started is by doing this; buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam or telling the truth about what is going on in America, and who has devoted her life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to first -- the cultural, and then the subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon in the 1970’s. She writes her riveting story in a book called “Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17, with bullets and rockets flying over her head. She lived in a hole in the ground, in the middle of a war zone of violent Islamic terror for seven years. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her and her family because Brigitte and her parents were Christians and this was, after all, the Islamic Jihad of Lebanon and they were the hated Kaffaar...

In her latest book “They Must Be Stopped” subtitled, Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, you will have your eyes opened to the true agenda of all Muslims.

The following chapter titles will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? You and your whole family can get started by joining with Brigitte and me, and join Act for America, click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen here you say? Think again, it is already happening here and has already happened to America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law. Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain has become The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative to this is, to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three choices: One, covert to Islam, and two, to become a Slave of Islam, or three, you can choose a horrifying torturous death. I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice. And that is the choice to fight back…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the Forth Choice… Choose the fourth choice first…

Remember: These Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa

Monday, October 20, 2008

Sharia Law: Coming to a Western Nation Near You?

On the heels of Great Britain’s announcement last week of officially adopting Sharia Law to be a standard right along with Parliamentary Law, Cinnamon Stilwell of Campus Watch reports that Colleges all over America are promoting Islam as a culture in America to be included right along with our Judeo Christian culture.

The deception of our Western societies is phenomenal; I fear that we, as the British have, will discover too late that Islam from its very foundation is a consuming theocracy, and that their Sharia law is in no way compatible with any other culture on the planet.

Georgetown University once a Christian College now includes a Muslim/Christian Studies Center funded by Prince Al-Walid bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud: الوليد بن طلال بن عبد العزيز آل سعود‎ of the House of Saud in Saudi Arabia.

Read what Cinnamon Stillwell has to say about the acceptable tolerance of the Middle Eastern Religion of Islam at Georgetown University in Washington DC; Georgetown a deceived Christian college who is now largely funded by the ‘Islamic Terrorist Wahhabist State’ of Saudi Arabia. .

de Andréa

Campus Watch Research
Sharia Law: Coming to a Western Nation Near You?
[incl. John Esposito, Noah Feldman]
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/5689

by Cinnamon StillwellFrontPage MagazineSeptember 25, 2008

http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=4DC77CF5-196F-4497-A2C2-906BACAFD91F

Georgetown University's Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding (ACMCU) will be hosting a conference on October 23 that asks the loaded question: "Is There a Role for Shari'ah in Modern States?"

The Saudi-funded ACMCU and its founding director, John Esposito, one of the foremost apologists for radical Islam in the academic field of Middle East studies, have certainly been doing their bit to make the idea more palatable.

The Saudi prince for whom ACMCU was named has been pumping millions of dollars into Middle East studies at Georgetown, Harvard, UC Berkeley, and beyond, and as the case of Esposito demonstrates, it magnifies the voices of scholars with a decidedly uncritical bent. As a result, ACMCU analysis regarding Sharia (or Islamic) law tends to focus not on its injustices (amputation, stoning, hanging, honor killing, punishment for blasphemy, execution of apostates, persecution of non-Muslims, sanctioned wife-beating, female genital mutilation, and so on), but rather on repackaging it in ways that will appeal to Western sensibilities. The concept of a more "moderate" version of Sharia law that is compatible with democracy is at the forefront of this effort.

While it's difficult to predict exactly what will take place at the upcoming ACMCU conference, the fact that Esposito will present the opening remarks provides considerable insight into the politics of the event.

Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think, a book co-authored by Esposito and executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies Dalia Mogahed, has been widely criticized for its blatant inaccuracies and attempts to whitewash anti-Western and extremist sentiment in the Muslim world. Accordingly, Sharia law is framed in a non-threatening fashion. As Robert Satloff put it in the Weekly Standard:

…Amazing as it sounds, according to Esposito and Mogahed, the proper term for a Muslim who hates America, wants to impose Sharia law, supports suicide bombing, and opposes equal rights for women but does not "completely" justify 9/11 is . . . "moderate."

At the Newsweek/Washington Post "On Faith" blog earlier this year, Esposito referenced his book as a means of downplaying concerns over support for Sharia law in the Muslim world:
…for many any mention of Shariah is often equated facilely with Taliban-like laws. In fact, as the Gallup World Poll shows, majorities of mainstream Muslims (women as well as men) want some form of Shariah, religious values, as a source of law. This sentiment is not all that different from a majority of Americans who want to see the Bible as a source of legislation. (See Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think)

But comparing Sharia law under a dictatorial or clerical regime to biblical inspiration in a secular, democratic nation is like comparing apples and oranges. Yet this is precisely the kind of moral equivalency one expects from Esposito at the ACMCU conference.
Providing further cause for concern, keynote speaker and Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman is a notorious champion of Sharia law. In a March, 2008 New York Times Magazine article on the subject, Feldman claimed:

In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world. Today, when we invoke the harsh punishments prescribed by Shariah for a handful of offenses, we rarely acknowledge the high standards of proof necessary for their implementation.

…At its core, Shariah represents the idea that all human beings — and all human governments — are subject to justice under the law.
Reviewing Feldman's latest book, The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Jonathan Schanzer elaborates on this disturbing thesis:

Feldman's central premise is that the scholars of early and medieval Islam were guardians of justice. These independent scholars, he argues, kept the all-powerful caliph in line by judiciously ensuring that his decrees were in accordance with Shari'a law. The proper application of Shari'a ensured fair governance. Thus, Feldman claims, resurrecting the scholarly class is needed today.
Yet Feldman's book, Schanzer concludes, "fails to convince the informed reader that Islamic law and democracy are destined for marriage."

In an aptly titled piece on Feldman's scholarship, "Shilling for Sharia at Harvard," Hillel Stavis warns that "it can only be a matter of time before the professor, having asserted that Sharia law is desirable, will assure us that its introduction in the United States is inevitable."

Considering recent developments in Britain, the inevitability of Sharia law may not just be an abstraction. As reported last week by The Times Online:

Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Melanie Phillips, writing for National Review Online, notes the role of Saudi funding and Middle East studies in furthering this process:

Even thought itself is being Islamized, with academic objectivity in the teaching of Islam and Middle East studies set aside in favour of indoctrination and propaganda. An as-yet-unpublished report by Prof. Anthony Glees says that extremist ideas are being spread by Islamic study centers linked to British universities and backed by multi-million-pound donations from Saudi Arabia and Muslim organizations. Professor Glees says, ‘Britain's universities will have to generate two national cultures: one non-Muslim and largely secular, the other Muslim. We will have two identities, two sets of allegiance and two legal and political systems.

Britain can serve as a cautionary tale for the West. Scholars who downplay the threats to democratic societies posed by the encroachments of Sharia law, and push a sanitized, idealized version thereof, may one day help usher in our worst nightmare.

Now there's a subject that would make for a truly groundbreaking Middle East studies conference.

Cinnamon Stillwell is the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum. She can be reached at stillwell@meforum.org.

Please read Related Documents

Other writings by Cinnamon Stillwell
Other items from FrontPage Magazine
Other items related to Harvard University
Other items related to University of California, Berkeley
Other items related to Georgetown University
Other items related to Saudi/Gulf Funding


THE BOTTOM LINE: Bear in mind, this encroachment on our culture is like none other. Islam will not become just another addition to our multicultural society, it will become our culture. Islam does not share, it dominates. It is an evil empire that Marxism and Nazism attempted to emulate. Our American schools K-20 are now infected with this supremacist’s deceptive theocracy of Islam and only you can stop it. Please join Cinnamon Stillwell and the many others like Brigitte Gabriel in the fight for the survival of our nation and our freedom.

de Andréa
.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Wall Street Bailouts

Do Wall Street Bailouts Mean America Has Become 'Socialist Communists'? Jim Cramer of CNBC’s Mad Money says government has engaged in Marxist philosophies in the AIG bailout. Now General Motors wants to be bought out by the government as well. Is this the beginning of the end of a free capitalist market in the U.S.? It certainly isn’t the beginning, but it may just be the end.

By de Andréa

On May 31, 1913 the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was passed, ending forever the original ‘Constitutional Republic of America’. What followed was the beginning of a true Democracy. Which according to all of history can only incrementally progress toward a Socialistic Dictatorship, is this why the Democrat Party calls itself the “Progressive Party”?

A little less than 100 years has passed since the congressional destruction of the American Republic. Since its demise, the United States has progressively inched its way toward a socialistic society with more and more social programs, causing an ever increasing dependence on government for what the 10th Amendment so clearly states is to be left up to the states or to the people.

A ‘National Government’ was so greatly feared by the Framers for good reason. The ‘Federalizing’ of the central government was to be kept in its place by the Constitution and followed by the 10th Amendment. In the one hundred years after the 17th Amendment and the subsequent introduction of ‘National Socialism’ we now may have the beginning of government ownership of big business.

In an article below by: Jeff Poor of Business & Media Institute one can read what the experts have to say, as they observe this as more than just an economic tragedy,
9/17/2008 12:01:16 PM

The federal government’s intervention and prevention of the collapse of American International Group (AIG) represents an acceptance of Marxist philosophies, according to some CNBC analysts.

“They never made the real calls, they never made the tough decisions,” CNBC “Mad Money” host Jim Cramer said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” September 17 of financial leaders.

“Their ideology was such they believed everyone should own a home including people who were deadbeats and had no right to own a home. They were anti-regulation. Now we have spent nearly a Trillion Dollars, bailing out these institutions and in a twist on what Nixon said after the
seizure last night of AIG and Fannie Mae – we’re all communists now.”

The day before, Cramer said on CNBC’s “Street Signs” that a bailout was necessary. He warned the markets would have frozen and not opened if AIG (NYSE:
AIG) wasn’t bailed out. He proposed the “pass-the-hat” global bailout.

Later on “Morning Joe” September 17, CNBC “Squawk on the Street” co-host Mark Haines made a similar observation, declaring a state of socialism on Wall Street.

“Well, everyone’s in favor of a free market until it doesn’t work to their advantage,” Haines said. “And then, they’re in favor of socialism and that’s where we are right now – that’s where we are right now.”

Haines’ assessment was that the free market failed for AIG – noting how AIG’s potential collapse had frozen up the banking system.

“The free market was not working as far as AIG was concerned,” Haines added. “[B]ut something had to be done because there was – this was banks at one point yesterday had stopped lending to each other because they were so nervous about what was going on in the credit markets.”

The long-time CNBC anchor admitted the government intervention was ill-conceived on a philosophical level, but it was a necessity – even though it didn’t fix the situation.

“Nobody really likes this on a philosophical basis, but we live in a real world and we can’t, can’t dither with philosophy when such serious matters are at stake,” Haines added. “So – I’m of the opinion this doesn’t really fix anything – it’s just another Band-Aid.”

Cramer and Haines weren’t the first to link government bailouts to communism. In a
September 8 interview on CNBC Europe, Rogers Holdings CEO Jim Rogers said America is “more communist than China right now.”

Also Read: America Has Died - To Thunderous Applause

THE BOTTOM LINE: In the process of moving away from personal responsibility and capitalism toward the dependence of socialism, we see only the wonderful handouts that we get from the generous benevolent national government. What we don’t see is the resulting dependency that accompanies what we determine to be easy acquisitions.

While we enjoy the fruits of someone else’s labor, we lose the personal responsibility and the independence that once was at the foundation of the American philosophy. We give up our freedom, choice, independence, and liberty, and become dependant subjects of the elitists.

While the bailout of big business at this point may be the logical thing to do, to keep the economy from total collapse, one must however, wonder just how we arrived at this point in order to say… “See Capitalism doesn’t work.” If one were to be so foolish as to buy into this nonsense, then I would have to say… Yes Capitalism does not work when government tries to nationalize it.

A chicken in every pot and a home for every citizen… There is nothing in the bill of rights that says we have the right to eat chicken or own a home. But there is something in the American philosophy that says we have the equal right to pursue happiness. So if a chicken in your pot and a home to put it in, is what will make you happy then we, as free Americans have the right to pursue it.

What socialism dictates is that the government has the right to take a home from someone that has two homes and give it to someone that has none. As Marxism teaches, this is the redistribution of wealth, the philosophy of Barrack Hussein Obama I might add.

The pressure put on the lending industry by the socialist congress to bring about the so-called equality of social standards by attempting to get every family in America into their own home no matter what… is what caused the collapse of the financial system.

So you see, it wasn’t that Capitalism didn’t work, on the contrary, it was the social philosophy of an elitist congress that set up the dominos that were programmed for collapse.

The worst part of this calamity is that it just gives more fuel to the socialists. Now because the damage has been established, the only way out seems to be more government interference.

If one starts a fire, sometimes the only way to put it out; is to set another fire, but one must consider that it may just burn the whole forest down.

de Andréa

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Barrack Hussein Obammah

A candidate for president of the United States, ‘Unbelievable’

By de Andrae


The poor excuse for a human being in the picture is that of Weatherunderground or Weatherman Terrorist Bill Ayers, The terrorist that bombed the Pentagon, several police stations, and yes the US Capital building something that even the (911) terrorists failed to accomplish.

So why is this significant? It is because William Ayers is the same poor excuse for a human being that jump started Barrack Hussein Obammah’s political career. Moreover just as the American hating Jeremiah Wright, Obama has been fast friends with Ayers ever since.

Are some American people really seriously thinking of electing this friend and supporter of terrorism and corruption and treason to be their president? Yes they are.

Is it ignorance, stupidity or just plain don’t care? Unfortunately, it is a lot of all three.

So what was Obama organizing in Illinois as a community organizer? One community organization he organized was Obama’s Islam youth terrorists training camp , reminiscent of Hitler’s Nazi Youth Brigade.

Is this just a bad dream, will I wake up tomorrow to find that this has just been a horrifying nightmare?

I would never have believed that America could have been so deceived as to vote for a candidate that hated the very country that he was seeking the presidency of, unless he is planning to “Change It”. And that is exactly what he is planning to do. He is running on the platform of “Change”

But do you know what he is planning to Change America into?
He is planning on disarming the citizens, a violation of the US constitution.
He is planning on disarming the US military including destroying our nuclear arsenal.
He is planning on turning America into a Marxist State much like the old Soviet Union.
He is planning on redistributing the wealth, a Marxist philosophy.
He is planning on fixing the elections through the Acorn organization.
He is planning on trading the relations we have with Israel, for a relationship with Islam
He is planning on promoting the Islamic Supremacist Philosophy during his presidency.
He is planning on the continuation and growth of socialism.
He is planning on more control by the new central nationalist government.
He is planning on replacing the US constitution with Sharia Law.
He is planning on loosing the war in Iraq.
He is planning on killing Osama bin Ladin, there is only room for one Muslim leader.
He is planning on pulling out of Afghanistan.
He is planning on telling the American people anything they want to hear to get elected.

Below is a list of information so you no longer need to be Ignorant, or stupid, I can’t help you, if you don’t care…

Just click on the articles

Is Obama A Muslim Sleeper

Obama’s Friend is Americas Enemy

Is Obama even an American Citizen??

Follow the money

Will America “Be The Obama Nation”

Once a Muslim, Always a Muslim

Muslims in the White House

America’s First Muslim President

Lights On?

Is Wright a Black Muslim?

The Paragon

Deceptive Endorsement

More on Barack

The Obama Connection

Is Obama an American or a Sleeper Black Muslim

de Andréa

Monday, October 13, 2008

Trail of Terror

If you are not yet a member of ACT for America’ or you have not read any of my articles lately, please read this one. It should cause you to want to join the war against Islam.

de Andréa
October 13, 2008

Below is an article that appeared in WorldNetDaily about an interview on radio, with our fearless leader Brigitte Gabriela

TRAIL OF TERROR Islamic takeover of U.S. already under-way Expert warns 'mainstream media' providing 'talking points' of Arab countries

"We welcomed everyone into our country, we had an open border policy Gabriel said, and people didn't realize that the ‘minority,’ the Muslims in the society, were not tolerant and did not believe all people were equal. They tried to impose their way of thinking on us, and they succeeded. The result, Gabriel said, “was that a radical terrorist organization tied to Islam, Hezbollah, now rules in Lebanon.

She noted it's been seven years since the Sept. 11, 2001, act of war on U.S. soil by Islamists, but America is falling to Islam's attack, and the battle already is far advanced.

They do not need to fire a single bullet to destroy us," she said. They are taking over our country culturally, just like they have taken over Europe. She said the ideology of Islam is being taught across the U.S. as part of world history courses for seventh graders.”

Click on this and read the WroldNetDaily Article as well as hear the radio interview. Brigitte explains how the Islamic takeover of America is exactly like the Islamic Jihad of Lebanon. Moreover, unless we stop it – we can expect the same results…

de Andréa

Friday, October 10, 2008

Barnes & Noble Promoting Terrorism

Flash Cards Designed by Saudi Arabia to Teach English/Arabic Translations are using terrorist brainwashing techniques to teach terrorism and Islamic Jihad to our children

By de Andréa

For those of you that are still ignorant of the Islamic cultural Jihad in our American Schools, education system, etc, this -- my deceived friend, is for you…

”We’ve all seen flash cards used to teach math functions and simple words to our children. But we’re sure you haven’t seen flash cards like these,” writes Gary Rogers of Act for America! ”One of our chapter leaders”, he said, “happened to be in a Barnes & Noble bookstore in Minnesota, and saw a package of flash cards apparently intended to help someone translate Arabic words and phrases into English. What he saw when he bought the cards was, to say the least, far different than what he expected.”

With a little research, I found that they also had ‘flashcards’ translating English to Arabic, with the same theme. It becomes quite obvious that the content is the intent rather than the language.

Here is a sample list of some of the English words and phrases used in this flash card set.

“assassination attempt”
“counter strike”
“attack”
“air strike”
“enemy”
“The army seized power”
“We buried the dead man yesterday”
“to seize power”
“martyr”
“to die in a battle”

To see a PDF image of the actual flashcards, designed by Fethi Mansour of the Brotherhood of Islam a terrorist organization operating here in the U.S. Please click here. You will need Adobe Reader or similar software to view the image.

If you can remember the flashcards that your parents and teachers used to teach you math and English, you will recall they may have had such controversial words and phrases such as “thank you,” “could you please help me?”, and “what time is it?” Until now, I don’t think you would have found an English translation flashcard set with words like “assassination attempt.”

In all of our ignorant bless, one should still wonder, who would need an Arabic flashcard set that translates “assassination attempt” into English or vice versa. Then again, if we were not so deceived maybe we wouldn’t wonder at all.

If you are a regular reader of mine you should know by now that I don’t make this stuff up. Everything I write is researched and documented. If you have children in public school, I can guarantee you that they have been exposed to the Islam-o-Fascistic ideology. They are also taught not to share this with their parents. Moreover it will over time, become more and more advanced and intrinsic.

There is a Judeo Christian principal that says: train up a child in the way he should go, and he will not depart from it. You might want to make sure your child is not being trained up to be a terrorist. This type of teaching is not education it is indoctrination/brainwashing and is being surreptitiously taught in elementary schools all over America, even in Christian Colleges. Your government is ignorantly promoting the advancement of this dangerous Islamic ideology because they are deceived.

If freedom is to be saved for your children and future generations it will be up to you.

What can you do??? Act for America
If you haven’t already done so, then do yourself and your family a favor; educate yourselves about Islam. The quickest, easiest, and least expensive way to get started doing this; is to buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam or telling the truth about what is going on in America, and who has devoted her entire life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to first -- the same cultural Jihad of infiltration that we are also now experiencing, in America, and second, the subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon in the 1970’s. She writes her riveting story in a book called “Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17, with bullets and rockets flying over her head. She lived in a hole in the ground, in the middle of a war zone of violent Islamic terror for seven years. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her and her family because Brigitte and her parents were Christian Lebanese (Phoenicians) and this was, after all, the Islamic Jihad of Lebanon and they were the hated Kaffaar...

If you contribute nothing toward this war against Islamic Cultural Jihad going on right now, right here in America, then you had better prepare yourself for the violent, militant Jihad that follows. And if you don’t prepare yourself for a bloody war in the streets of your neighborhood, then you had better prepare yourself and your family for death…I don’t know how I can make it any clearer than that.

In her latest book “They Must Be Stopped” subtitled, Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, you will have your eyes opened to the true agenda of all Muslims.

The following is an example of some of the chapter titles that will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? You and your whole family can get started by joining with Brigitte and me, and join Act for America, click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen here you say? Think again, it is already happening here and has already happened to America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law. Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain has become The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative to this is, to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three options: One, covert to Islam, and two, to become a Slave of Islam, or three, you can choose a horrifying torturous death.

I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice . And that is the choice to fight back now…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the forth choice

Remember: These Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa

Friday, October 03, 2008

Our Islamic terrorist Infiltrated Colleges

Just in case you are not fully aware of the extent to which the Islamic infiltration into the American culture has come, the unedited article below written by Cohen and Movroydis from FrontPageMagazine will explain how the America of the future, will be the Muslim Nation of Ammerikah.

Passing themselves off as a warm-fuzzy peace loving people our Colleges and universities are now so saturated with the infiltration of the Muslim culture; that our kids are not just learning about it, they are living it. And these kids who have been programmed with the Muslim mission and agenda or Islam, are the future of America. Keep that in mind as you read this.

Campus Support for the Terrorist Jihad

By Reut R. Cohen and Jonathan Constantine Movroydis
FrontPageMagazine.com
Monday, May 05, 2008

The Muslim Student Association (MSA) maintains more than 150 chapters at colleges across the country, fronting as a cultural and religious organization. Realistically, however, the MSA is a radical political group that was initially founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the godfather of al-Qaeda and Hamas. The purpose of the MSA is to promote jihad (the subjugation of a host country) in institutions of higher learning.

At the University of California- Irvine (UCI), the Muslim Student Union (MSU) is also a part of the Muslim Student Association and has openly supported terrorist groups. Presently the MSU aims to "build an environment that enhances good, discourages bad, and provides networks of resources, knowledge, people, and companionship to its members.” The MSU offers "daily congregational prayers, daily free iftars … over eight weekly classes, a quarterly magazine Alkalima, coalition building with other clubs on campus, and a gateway to the larger Muslim community …" MSU also provides career advice and a study program to help Muslims at UCI.

Yet underneath this innocuous description it also becomes apparent that this organization preserves a seething hatred of Jews, Israel, and America. MSU activities constantly reveal support for violence, anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism. MSU members have made their positions clear: they support Hamas, they support "freedom fighting" and they have publicly declared that Zionists have no future and Israel will soon be wiped off the map. Members of this organization commonly wear green armbands to signal their allegiance to the terrorist group Hamas.

Earlier this month, a student coalition led a boycott against two Orange County, CA, movie theaters for their decision to hold a private screening and fund-raiser co-sponsored by CAIR (Council of American-Islamic Relations) and the UC Irvine Muslim Student Union. The featured film was the USA Versus Sami Al-Arian: (1) a hagiographic screening on the self-starved convicted terrorist. An indictment against the United States government on the egregious charge of false imprisonment, the film compares the Palestinian Islamic Jihad collaborator to a Socratic like figure jailed for his patriotic dissent and practice of his fundamental civil rights.

The evidence against Al-Arian was damning, alleging that Al-Arian, a former professor at the University of South Florida, was the head of the American wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The indictment against Al-Arian suggests that Al-Arian abused his position as a university professor to bring other members of his terrorist group into the United States "under the guise of academic conferences and meetings." (2)

Al-Arian purportedly also helped Palestinian Islamic Jihad members "receive cover as teachers or students" at USF and worked to further alliances with other groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

The event was first expected to be held at an Irvine theater owned by Starplex Cinemas, but as the story became viral on Friday, April 11, scores of readers called and emailed (3) (4) Starplex’s corporate office with their concerns, prompting special events coordinator Kristen Wheaton to cancel the screening and fundraiser on Monday, April 14.” (5)

In a phone call with Wheaton about her decision to cancel the event, her response was particularly noteworthy and further evidence of the deceptiveness with which extremist Muslim organizations operate. According to Wheaton, two female members of the Muslim community, Marya Bangee and Natania Abdelfattah, reserved the venue and misled the theater about the nature of the screening, describing it as a “college student film.” (6)

Moreover, despite CAIR officials charging Wheaton with allegations of breach of contract, the theater was never notified of the fact that CAIR co-sponsored the screening, or that the proceeds from ticket sales would be spent on Mr. Al-Arian’s legal defense. More specifically, in order to conceal their involvement from the theater, CAIR-LA’s Executive Director Hussam Ayloush directed Bangee and Abdelfattah to bill his personal credit card.

When CAIR decided to change the venue for the screening and fund-raiser to Edwards Woodbridge 5 in Irvine, they did so fearing that the community would inform the parent company Regal Cinemas about their motives. (7) (8) After calling a series of theaters in Irvine, we were able to procure and publicize the new location on Wednesday, April 16. (9)

Though Regal Cinemas received similar scores of protesting phone calls and emails, (10) the Tennessee-based Corporation ignored community concerns and decided to proceed with the screening and fundraiser. In a phone call with the theater manager about the ultimate decision to hold the event, she replied that people can use the theater for any desired purpose. Officials from the corporate office couldn’t be reached for comment.
Despite Regal’s disappointing decision, the fundraiser was sparsely attended and a dismal failure. Secretly moving the venue to a new and more expensive location on very short notice resulted in only a couple dozen regulars mainly from the Muslim community. (11)

Though CAIR is charging anti-Muslim bigotry and censorship against those who participated in the effort to boycott the screening for this fictitious hero, (12) only a government body possesses the unwarrantable power to levy the heavy handedness of law. This effort was an entirely civil and democratic effort grounded in the classical power of persuasion and the modern self-empowering influence of new media.
Accordingly, the decentralization of media has raised an unprecedented level of awareness and a civic virtue, essentially an army of readers promoting goodwill, with a discerning eye on behavior potentially destructive to the community.

In utilizing the new media’s unique ability to mobilize political action, this month’s grass-roots initiative allowed readers to voice their concerns and express to US businesses the right to vote with their money. Some have expressed their decision never to attend an Edward’s chain again. (13) Consequently, Edwards should realize that in supporting the legal defenses of convicted terrorists like Al-Arian, they better expect intense scrutiny.****

As I said this is totally unedited so I am not responsible for its content or the format…

THE BOTTOM LINE:
With the many Muslim Organizations that freely operate in our institutions of higher learning it is only a matter of time until we will no longer be able to stop them legally or politically. We truly haven’t much time left until those two options are a thing of the past, then the third option must be invoked. And trust me you won’t like the third Option.

What simple thing can you do -- to help those unsung heroes that are fighting right now for your survival and the survival of your country? It’s easy, see below…

Act for America
If you haven’t already done so, then do yourself and your family a favor; educate yourselves about Islam and the Constitution… The quickest, easiest, and least expensive way to get started doing this; is to buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam or telling the truth about what is going on in America, and who has devoted her life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to first -- the cultural, and then the subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon in the 1970’s. She writes her riveting story in a book called Because They Hate it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17, with bullets and rockets flying over her head. She lived in a hole in the ground, in the middle of a war zone of violent Islamic terror for seven years. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her and her family because Brigitte and her parents was Christian Lebanese (Phoenicians) and this was, after all, the Islamic Jihad of Lebanon and they were the hated Kaffaar...

If you contribute nothing toward this war against Islamic Cultural Jihad going on right now, right here in America, then you had better prepare yourself for the violent, militant Jihad that follows. And if you don’t prepare yourself for a bloody war in the streets of your neighborhood, then you had better prepare yourself and your family for death…I don’t know how I can make it any clearer than that.

In her latest book “They Must Be Stopped subtitled, Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, you will have your eyes opened to the true agenda of all Muslims.

The following is an example of some of the chapter titles that will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.
How do we stop it? You and your whole family can get started by joining with Brigitte and me, and join Act for America, click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen here you say? Think again, it is already happening here and has already happened to America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law. Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain has become The Great Islamic State of Britannia.
The alternative to this is, to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three choices: One, covert to Islam, and two, to become a Slave of Islam, or three, you can choose a horrifying torturous death. I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice. And that is the choice to fight back now…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the Forth Choice… Choose the fourth choice first…

Remember: These Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa