The Coup De Tant Plot to Bring Down a Duly Elected
U.S. President
By de Andréa
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’
Posted May 18, 2019
If you would like to write
me direct with a question or a comment on this or other articles, you can email
me at writedeandrea@hotmail.com
Was The So Called Russia
Collusion Just A Hoax By The DeepState to Frame Donald Trump as a Communist Agent?
If this is true my friend, it will most certainly leave an ugly scar on
American political history.
This reads like the history of a corrupt foreign third world
country.
By now everyone knows that the DeepState’s
puppet president - was supposed to be Hilary Clinton or at least one of the Republican
nominees that were also one of the many SwampRats in the DeepState controlled by
the Shadow Government of the United States.
Apparently none of the rats in the DeepSwamp,
in their wildest nightmares, thought that an outsider who believed in the old Constitutional
Republic would win the Republican nomination, much less win the Presidential
election. Especially if they cheated… The Rats had to think of something quick
to stop this disastrous possibility.
This
is what AG Barr is now investigating…
Ranking
Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Devin Nunes’
(R-Calif.) reaction in
an interview with John Batchelor on May 9, who asked him about a
report from The Hill’s John Solomon
that details a meeting with a former British spy Christopher Steele — author of
the false allegation paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the
Clinton campaign that President Donald Trump was a Russian Communist agent —
had with Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec on Oct. 11, 2016.
Nunes
said: “This is probably done in conjunction with Fusion GPS that
was making this stuff up, they conveniently were able to get this into the FBI.
Willing takers at the FBI, and this was all’ to dirty up the Trump campaign. I
mean, I have to say, you can’t make this stuff up, but… that’s exactly what
they did.”
The
meeting was memorialized in a memo Kavalec typed up afterward, and cast serious doubts on
some of the allegations Steele was making, as well as his credibility.
According to Kavalac, Steele was “keen to see this information come to light
prior to November 8” to have an Impact on 2016 election.
The
documents from a Freedom of Information Act request by Citizens United included
a bunch of whoppers, some included in the Steele dossier, others not. For
example, it said that the former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort owed $100
million to the Russians. It turns out that was an more than a slight exaggeration,
as the amount was more
like $10 million from Russian
businessman Oleg Deripaska.
Former
Trump campaign advisor Carter Page was said to have met with Rosneft Oil executive
Igor Sechin. This was from the fake dossier, the specific (absurd) allegation was that Page had been offered a 19
percent stake in Rosneft, Russia’s state oil company that would have been worth
billions of dollars. There is no mention of a meeting with Sechin in the
Mueller report by Page.
Steele
also detailed to Kavalec “a technical/human operation run out of
Moscow targeting the election. There is a significant Russian network in the
U.S. run by the Russian Embassy that draws on emigres to do hacking and
recruiting… Payments to those recruited are made out of the Russian consulate
in Miami.” But, interestingly enough, as Kavalec noted in her
comments, “It
is important to note, that there is no Russian consulate in Miami.”
In
other words, Steele’s assertions right from the beginning did not pass the
smell test to Kavalec, since it included easily debunked claims like the
fictitious Russian consulate in Miami. At the very least, they came with a huge
tongue in cheek grain of salt. And this was 10 days before the Justice
Department went to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to
get a warrant to conduct electronic surveillance (i.e. spy) on Page and the
Trump campaign, that gave the Justice Department access to campaign phone
calls, emails, texts and more.
If
you remember, it was trump who immediately accused the FBI of spying on, his
campaign and illegally taping his phone at Trump tower. And also if you recall
the complicit media quoted FBI Director Comey as denying the charge as rubbish,
making trump sound like a paranoid conspiracy theorist.
Nunes
found it unbelievable that the Kavalec memo did not find its way to the FBI,
especially considering that parts of it were classified, telling Batchelor, “I
find it very hard to believe that the FBI [Comey] never saw this memo, in fact,
I’m quite sure it [Comey did] because the State Department was anxious to
get as much information over to the FBI as possible” including other dossiers
that had been handed off.”
“I
think they realized [with the FOIA request] that they put something out that
didn’t belong out and they later tried to retroactively go back and classify
it,” Nunes added.
All this
comes atop the Mueller investigation and report debunking several other claims that had been made by
Steele.
We
already know the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants taken out against the Trump campaign starting in October
2016 relied on the dossier by former British spy Christopher Steele paid for by the DNC
and the (criminal) Hillary Clinton campaign.
Steele
had alleged that not only had Russia hacked the Democrats and put the
emails on Wikileaks, which was already
public knowledge since June
2016, but that Trump and his campaign helped with “full knowledge and support”
of the operation. Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, as well as
campaign advisor Carter Page when he traveled to Moscow in July 2016, were both
named by Steele as the key intermediaries to the Kremlin. Then Steele said
then-Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen had traveled to Prague in the summer
of 2016 to meet with Russian agents to mop up the fallout of the supposed
operation. Which was just another lie.
Now’ we know, based on the Mueller report
that it was all false. The report
stated, “In particular, the Office did not find evidence likely to prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafort, George
Papadopoulos, and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government — or at
its direction, control or request — during the relevant time period.”
Manafort
wasn’t even brought up on Russian collusion charges, he was charged with
totally unrelated tax and bank fraud. (Witch Hunt, hold someone upside down and
see if anything falls out) Cohen has had his own set of problems with federal
prosecutors, but being a Russian agent is not one of them. Per the Mueller
report, “Cohen had never
traveled to Prague…” And so, he very well could not have been there meeting
with Russian intelligence officials.
NOTE: Cohen having never traveled to Prague was obvious as
early as Jan. 2017, when Buzzfeed
published the dossier, and should have been obvious to U.S. investigators
months before then.
As
for Page, he was never charged with anything. A footnote justifying the
issuance of the FISA warrants against him stated, “On four occasions, the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) issued warrants based on a finding of
probable cause to believe that Page was an agent of a foreign power. 50 U.S.C.
§§ 1801(b), 1805(a)(2)(A). The FISC’s probable-cause finding was based on a
different (and lower) standard than the one governing the Office’s decision
whether to bring charges against Page, which is whether admissible evidence
would likely be sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page acted
as an agent of the Russian Federation during the period at issue. Cf United
States v. Cardoza, 713 F.3d 656, 660 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (explaining that probable
cause requires only ‘a fair probability,’ and not ‘certainty, or proof beyond a
reasonable doubt, or proof by a preponderance of the evidence’).”
The
Mueller report made no effort to corroborate the Steele dossier or to vindicate
its sources. Steele said they were Russian, but they are not named: Source A
was a “former top Russian intelligence officer”; Source B was a “senior Russian
Foreign Ministry figure”; Source C was a “senior Russian financial official”;
Source D was a “close associate of Trump” (golden showers source); Source E was
an “ethnic Russian close associate” of Trump (golden showers source); Source F
was a “female staffer of the hotel”; and source G was a “senior Kremlin
official”.
The
fact that Steele utilized “sub-sources” was included in the FISA application,
meaning the court knew it was not an eye-witness account. The court knew it was
second-hand at best, or third-hand information — that
is, hearsay and not allowed as probable cause for a warrant.
One
possibility that is being explored by Attorney General William Barr right now
is that the sources are who Steele said they were, Russian intelligence and
Kremlin officials, and therefore, that the dossier could have been planted as
Russian disinformation.
Cutting
against that, was a New York Times report Scott Shane, Adam Goldman and Matthew
Rosenberg reported on April 20 that in Jan. 2017 the FBI interviewed one of
the main sources for the dossier and came away with “misgivings about its
reliability [that] arose not long after the document became public” in Jan.
2017.
Per
the Times report: “By January 2017, F.B.I. agents had tracked down and interviewed one of
Mr. Steele’s main sources, a Russian speaker from a former Soviet republic who
had spent time in the West, according to a Justice Department document and
three people familiar with the events, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
After questioning him about where he’d gotten his information, they suspected
he might have added his own interpretations to reports passed on by his
sources, one of the people said. For the F.B.I., that made it harder to decide
what [or who] to trust.”
The
FBI at the time of course discounted the possibility of the dossier being
Russian disinformation: “F.B.I. agents considered whether Russia had
polluted the stream of intelligence, but did not give it much credence,
according to the former official.”
Which
leaves the other possibility, considered by Nunes and Batchelor in the interview
that it
was simply fabricated. Going back to the latest revelation
from John Solomon, think of it, a Russian disinformation plot to convince
Steele or the State Department that there was a Russian consulate in Miami that
did not actually exist? Some of the stuff is simply so absurd, they weren’t
even good lies, so maybe it really was fabricated by Steele or his sub-sources
to suit a predetermined narrative.
One
thing’s for certain, Attorney General Barr needs to get to the bottom of this,
and I believe he will. Moreover, none of this should be classified anymore.
President Trump needs to make as much information as possible publicly
available so just as he/Trump said, the American people can learn how the
nation’s intelligence services, courts and the Justice Department were
politicized and/or criminalized to spy on the opposition party in an election
year — all based on a con to either illegally discredit a candidate and/or
unseat him after he was elected.
Either
way this is a classic case of a political coup de’ tant that in the past has
only happened in third world countries, and is a sure sign of future things to expect
from the so-called Democrat Progressive Party which is code for Socialist
Communist Party.
Are
you ready for criminal tyranny my friend?
THE BOTTOM LINE: I don’t know about you, but I feel as
if I had just been informed of my cheating spouse. Betrayed by my own
government who I trusted explicitly when I was in the military. I always
thought if you can’t trust the U.S. Government then you can’t trust anyone.
I
guess you can’t trust anyone…especially in government.
"All governments are run by liars
and nothing they say should be believed."
-I.
F. Stone
Thank
God, He is in control…
Thanks for listening my friend. Now
go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.
-
de Andréa
Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your family and
or friends to hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment