Tuesday, June 26, 2007

HAPPY GAY COMING OUT DAY


HAPPY GAY COMING OUT DAY is offensive to me and therefore should be a hate crime…

By de Andréa

I originally wrote about this issue On March 15, 2007, titled, 9th Cercuit Court censors Christians. [You can reread it by checking the archives for March] I wrote the article about this same one sided civil rights issue as it unfolded in Oakland Ca. It should be obvious to anyone with an IQ above 95 that all this “hate crime” nonsense should work both ways.

George Will recently wrote an article titled, “When marriage became a hate crime” for the Jewish World Review. In it he said, Marriage is the foundation of the natural family and sustains family values”. That statement; according to Oakland city government, “is inflammatory and a hate crime”. “That city's government says those words, in bold italics here, constitute something akin to hate speech, and cannot be tolerated in the government's open e-mail system and employee free speech bulletin board.”

If making a factual, historically and scientifically supported statement, is a prosecutable “hate crime”, then I declare war on these scrambled DNA mutants. If nature, as they say, made them what they are, and played a dirty trick on them, it isn’t the rest of societies fault. In a free society one cannot exercise ones rights while taking that same right away from others, if so, freedom would self-destruct. Moreover, this is exactly what is happening right here in the once “late great free nation of America”.

I accept all this “hate crime”, “homophobic” garbage that the homosexual group has dumped on the rest of society as a declaration of war on the heterosexual straight, normal society. What has existed as commonplace, natural, and prevalent for 6000 years in societal history doesn’t become a crime just because it opposes a self proclaimed mutation of nature.

The unconstitutional McCain-Feingold law, empowered government to regulate the quantity, content, and timing of political campaign speech about governmental electorates. But it was to become more than that, it evolved and became an incremental and predictable step toward making free speech a crime. Moreover, it was just a matter of time that the right of free speech would eventually be sacrificed.

This small minority of homosexuals, who go against the laws of nature, say that free speech impedes their right to promote a minority mutated agenda of their specific social objectives. And it was just as predictable that speech suppression would become an instrument of cultural combat used to settle ideological scores and advance unusual and obnoxious political agendas by manipulating and silencing its adversaries.

As a refresher of the issue, a small group of African-American Christian women working for Oakland's government organized the Good News Employee Association (GNEA), which they announced with a flier describing their group as "a forum for people of Faith to express their views on the contemporary issues of the day. With respect for the “Natural Family, Marriage and Family Values.” The flier was distributed after other employees' groups, including those advocating gay rights, had advertised their political views and activities on the city's e-mail system and bulletin board.

When the GNEA asked for equal opportunity to communicate by that system and that board, they were denied. Furthermore, the flier they posted was taken down and destroyed by city officials, who declared it "homophobic" and disruptive. The city government said the flier was "determined" to promote harassment based on sexual orientation. The city warned that the flier and communications like it could result in disciplinary action "up to and including termination."

Effectively, the city proscribed that any speech that even one person might say, questioned the gay rights agenda, created what one person felt was a "hostile environment,” is considered a hate crime This, even though gay rights advocates used the city's communication system to advertise "Happy Coming Out Day.” Yet the terms "natural family," "marriage" and "family values" are considered intolerably inflammatory.

I what my Heterosexual Rights, and gay “Happy Coming Out Day” is offensive to me. I want these Homosexuals arrested and put in jail for a “hate crime”. Moreover they have stolen the word “gay”, just so that they can tap-dance around the process of revealing their true identity. Now that the homosexuals have nicked the word gay, to hide behind, the rest of society can no longer use the word.

In Oakland, this dialectic of censorship proceeded on a reasonable premise joined to a preposterous theory. The premise is that city officials are entitled to maintain workplace order and decorum. The truth is that government supervisors have such unbridled power of prior restraint on speech in the name of maintaining order and decorum that they can nullify the First Amendment by declaring that even the mild historically accepted text of the GNEA flier is inherently disruptive.
The only cited disruptive opponent was one lesbian's complaint that the flier made her feel "targeted" and "excluded.” The truth is, that she put herself in that position and thereby excluded herself and now wants society to pay for her irresponsibility, oh! I forgot they say they are mutants and can’t help it. But anyone should not have the power to be a censor just by saying someone's speech has hurt his or her feelings. However, GNEA's members could plausibly argue that the city's speech police have created a "hostile workplace environment" against them. Naw, that would of course be free hate speech, I mean free speech, I’m sorry, I mean hate speech. Oh boy, one has to be careful what one says in this free country that still advertises the right of freedom of speech.

The Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the city's right to impose speech restrictions that are patently not content neutral. (or politically incorrect) I understand that Congress is currently trying to enact yet another "hate crime" law that would authorize enhanced punishments for crimes committed because of, among other things, the sexually challenged mutants. [This evolution is blatantly happening before ones very eyes]

The HILC, a coalition of African-American clergy, the High Impact Leadership Coalition, opposes this, fearing it might be used "to muzzle the church.” And it will! The clergy argue that in our "litigation prone society" this legislation would result in lawsuits having "a chilling effect" on speech and religious liberty. As this Oakland case demonstrates, that, too, is eventually probable.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Just as this case has incrementally and surreptitiously evolved from an unconstitutional law designed to stop the free exchange of ideas and thoughts regarding the election of so-called representatives, (which incidentally was one of the two main reasons that the framers documented the first Amendment) it will, unless we go to war to reverse this perversion of the First Amendment, it will continue to evolve and eventually destroy the very foundation of this Country.

**********************
December 15, 1791
“Articles in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United Stated of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. The conventions of a number of States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, (bold italics mine) that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, (bold italics mine) will best insure the beneficient ends of its institution.

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

*****************

When was the last time the Congress made a law that had to do with religion or restricted the free exercise thereof??? When was the last time Congress made a law abridging your freedom of speech??? When was the last time the freedom of the press was stepped on??? When was the last time you were denied the right to peaceably assemble??? Moreover do you even know how to properly petition the Government for redress of grievances??? I have news for you; because Congress has exercised its right to dictate what they determine is the proper formal protocol one would use to petition the government, one would have to be a Philly lawyer to figure out how to do it properly, otherwise you can forget your petitions.

Our Federal, State, and local governments have all violated this Constitutional Amendment; moreover they will continue to do so, until it is for some only a distant memory. In time the rest will not even have heard of it, then it will be the tyrannical oppression of the early 17 hundreds all over again.
Earlier, I mentioned that this hate crime business works both ways, so I am inventing a new word. (after all it is a popular thing to do these days) I am inventing the word Hetrophobic. That's right, these self-described mutants of nature who hide behind the hijacked word Gay, are Hetrophobic and are committing hate crimes; it has become a war of self defence.

Moreover, in the face of this destruction, the liberals, both Democrat and Republican, call themselves progressives. Sometimes just protecting what one has, is progress enough, think about it…

de Andréa

No comments: