The Second Amendment is Unconstitutional

By de Andréa

This one really chaps my hide:

The lawyers for the District of Columbia have decided that the Bill of rights is unconstitutional, at least the Second Amendment is. Well do you know what? I have decided that lawyers are unconstitutional.

That’s right, no where in the Constitution is it written that lawyers have the right to decide anything, including what they can have for breakfast and when or where they can relieve themselves. I am sure getting fed up with these self appointed so-called experts of the U.S. Constitution that have never read the document much less researched the history of this inspired Law.

How do I know this? Because I have read the Constitution and I have a stack of books 18 inches high on the history and the meaning of the second Amendment alone, and I have read and studied them all. Moreover, if these D.C. lawyers would have done their homework they wouldn’t be flapping their gums with so much ignorance.

According to the D.C. Metropolitan Washington times, these Legal Geniuses in the District of Columbia have said that according to the Second Amendment, only Militias are supposed to have any weapons. I will let you decide, it does not take a Law Professor to understand this. Quote, Article II The U.S. Constitutional Bill of Rights, “A well regulated Militia, (comma) being necessary to the security of a free State, (comma) the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, (comma) shall not be infringed. (period)

So, what we are reading here, written by the framers obviously with an IQ somewhat higher than our Washington D.C. lawyers, are, that two God given rights, not Government privileges, shall not be infringed. There is one obviously necessary [right] here, in order to secure a free State, (comma) [because it says so] and that is, there shall be a “Militia” well regulated, and then a second [right], “the right of the people (that is “t h e p e o p l e”, for the lawyers who can’t read fast) to Keep and bear arms”. Then both [rights] are followed up with “Shall not be in fringed”. Which means in plain American, ‘don’t even think about messing with this right.


How anyone with an IQ above 30 can misinterpret this Second Article of the Amendments so badly, is a mystery to me, unless one with a purpose, has the agenda to pervert this particular part of the supreme law of this country, or possibly the whole body of the Constitution for that matter. Naw, that would be criminal and un-American, wouldn’t it?

Todd Kim is one of these legal geniuses in D.C. that has had such a difficult time comprehending such a straight forward document, moreover, he has obviously spent to much time learning how to manipulate and circumvent the law that he has had absolutely no time to study Constitutional History, much less the Philosophy of Law. I do wonder though, just what cereal box Mr. Kim has fished his State Bar license out of.

“We interpret the Second Amendment in Military terms” says Todd Kim the District’s solicitor general who has told the U.S. Court of appeals that “the city has the authority to ban all weapons”. Really; I wonder if he means kitchen knives, ball bats and finger nails as well? Who does this south end of a north bound donkey think he is. No one, repeat, no one, has any authority to deny a God given right except God. The Law says “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” that means by anyone including you, Mr., Todd Kim.

Anyway, who cares how Mr. Kim interprets anything, he is not a Supreme Court Judge. Moreover, there is nothing military in the Second Amendment, if Mr. Kim is referring to the word militia; first, any second grader can see that the reference to Militia is to the security of a free State and not the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and second, Mr. Kim is really showing his ignorance of American History here, the Militia was never a Government Military as we know it today, it was a bunch of rag tag ordinary citizen farmers (PEOPLE) with guns, that liberated this country from the oppression from which Mr. Kim obviously wants us to return.

The Minutemen was just such a citizens Militia that defended this country’s freedom back in the late 1700’s just as today’s Minutemen Citizens Militia is still defending this Nation from an enemy foreign invasion down on our Southern Border. (Something by the way that our Government Military refuses to do) But of course Mr. Kim wouldn’t know anything about that, because Mr. Kim is too busy trying to aid the criminals and enemies of this Nation by doing his best to create a defenseless oppressed nation out of the U.S. before our enemy even has a chance to defeat us.

If Mr. Todd Kim the District of Colombia’s solicitor general has his way, this country will be completely disarmed except for a few military solders and an even smaller police department, and an awful lot of criminals, this country would then be ripe enough to be plucked by the criminals and the rest of the enemy that Mr. Kim so legally supports with his brand of Totalitarian law.




THE BOTTOM LINE: For Mr. Ignorant Todd Kim’s information, the Bill of Rights is directed to the people not to the Government. The government has no rights or powers except that which is found in the Constitution and or that the people may accord to it from time to time. (Read the 10th Amendment Mr. Kim) The people, on the other hand, have as the declaration says, Inalienable rights given to them by their creator and can be only taken away by their creator. Mr. Todd Kim must believe that he, and he alone, is god, with as he says, the “authority to take away all weapons”.

I have news for you Mr. High and Mighty Todd Kim District [Solicitatator]; I am breaking your crown, and taking you down off of your throne, because a god, you are not. The Bible, (God’s law) which if you were a real lawyer, you would know, says that there is only one God, who has set us free, and has given us all of our rights, and you Mr. Kim, are not any kind of a god. Moreover you would do well to ask God’s forgiveness for the feeble attempt at impersonating Him.

de Andréa