Thursday, April 02, 2009

Obama, Enemy of the State

Our President is no friend of America, he courts 'America-haters', and what’s more he plans to attend an Islamic conference that ‘seeks Islamic interests’--- the interests of our enemy.

By de Andréa

You may not be thoroughly convinced that Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah the president of the United States is a ‘Communist Muslim.’ Even though both of his fathers were Muslim and his mother was a communist. Even though he was brought up and educated as a child by Muslim madrassas in Muslim schools; even though he lived with his communist grandfather who taught him all about communism; even though all of his childhood and adult close friends were and are either communists or Muslims; even though a Muslim terrorists organization paid for his college education: even though for twenty years he attended a black Muslim hate America church cleverly disguised as some kind of a Christian church; even though in a television interview he let it slip that he was proud of his Muslim faith; even though he is now in the process of hiring as many Muslims as he can to work in the White House; even though he plans to attend a conference that ‘seeks ‘Islamic Sharia interests' the interests of our enemy and the enemy of the ‘Free World’.

If you aren’t convinced at least of the possibility that Obama may be a Communist Muslim, then no matter what proof there is; you would not see the truth. In Arabic it’s called Taqiyyah, the deception of Islam.

If you have been a regular reader of mine, you will know that long before most of us had ever heard of Barack Hussein Obama, I warned as far back as 2003 that someday soon the United States would have a Muslim congress and a Muslim President, and the people would be deceived and believe that he was here to save us all from the “Great Satan”.

Well…guess what? We have Muslim Congressmen and a Muslim President …

Concern, even inside the belt-way has been mounting over President Obama's scheduled participation in the ‘U.N.'s Alliance of Civilizations’ summit in Turkey in April, with critics painting the organization as anti-Western and advocating only Muslim and Iranian interests.

"The Alliance might be more appropriately called a U.N.-approved Slush Fund for Advancing Iranian and Other Islamic Interests," wrote Claudia Rosett, a Forbes contributor and journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

In a separate report by the Heritage Foundation it labeled the Alliance forum "well-intentioned" but with little prospect for success due to "bias and objectionable proposals to freedom of expression.” The report is titled "Why President Obama should not attend the Alliance of Civilizations forum."

After the ‘G-20 Conference’ in London concerning the growing economic issue, Obama is reportedly due at the Alliance on April 7. The organization was formed in 2005 as an offshoot of the Dialogue of Civilizations, an earlier U.N. project founded by former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, who is still a member of the Alliance.

Other Alliance member States or participating organizations, include China; the Organization of the Islamic Conference; the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; the Arab League; Turkey; and the Arab League Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization. Not on the list of member States, because most of these organizations are Muslim terrorist’s organizations, are Israel and the U.S. This may change soon as the U.S. Administration moves away from Israel and in the direction of Islam.

In 2006, the Alliance released a 63-page official report largely laying blame on the West for negative perceptions of Muslims and Islam. The report only mentioned Islamic terrorism once – in its recommendations section it suggested that the Western media should not use the term terrorism. We are incidentally changing the term ‘terrorism’ to ‘man-caused disasters’. It is obviously more warm and fuzzy, politically correct, and more importantly, it completely removes the responsibility from its source.

It is interesting however, that the Quran specifically instructs Muslims to “strike terror in the hearts of the Infidel” They must think that we don’t know that… sadly, they are probably right.

The Western media they said, should refrain from using certain terms in reporting on Muslims and Islam, the report recommended, "suspending the use of terms such as 'Islamic terrorism' and 'Islamic fascism'”– which they say “has contributed to an alarming increase in Islamophobia which further exacerbates Muslim fears of the West." That --- however might be a good thing.

Jorge Sampaio, U.N. ‘Grand Mufti’ Representative for the Alliance, declared at a press conference in Iran last year that freedom of speech should be balanced with respect for religion. "There is a balance to be found between freedom of expression and respect for religion and for religious feelings and principles," he said. This of course, is ‘Muslim code speak’ for no freedom of speech for ya’all---Not until you convert to Islam that is…

According to Iranian state-run television, Sampaio also told Supreme Islamic Revolution Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei that Iran "has an important role to play within the Alliance of Civilizations because of its unique cultural and religious makeup."

Iran's Khatami, meanwhile, has reportedly been actively involved with shaping the Alliance agenda. Also, as Rosett pointed out, Khatami entered the U.S. in 2006 for an Alliance Meeting and used his U.N.-sponsored trip to stay in the country for another two weeks. During that time he embarked on a speaking tour that saw him denounce America and keynote a Washington fundraising dinner for the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, another American based Islamic terrorist organization started by the centuries old Egyptian terrorist group the ‘Muslim Brotherhood’.

"From U.S. soil, thanks to an Alliance entry ticket, Khatami served broadly as a prominent spokesman for Iran's interests – just as Iran was thumbing its nose at U.S. efforts, via the U.N. Security Council, to put a stop to Tehran's pursuit of nuclear bomb fuel,” wrote Rosett:

Alliance hails 'anti-Israel' Arab plan
The Alliance's 2006 report, seemed to focus disproportionately on Israel. It painted a picture that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is largely to blame for much of the violence in the Middle East.

The report recognizes the importance of a so-called "Arab Peace Initiative," which defenders of Israel warn would leave the Jewish state with truncated, difficult-to-defend borders and could threaten Israel's Jewish character by compelling it to accept millions of foreign Arabs.

Following scores of denials he would trumpet the plan, Obama in January hailed the Arab initiative, which offers normalization of ties with the Jewish state in exchange for extreme Israeli concessions. In an interview with an Arab television network – his first formal interview as president – Obama stated: "Well, here's what I think is important. Look at the proposal that was put forth by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. ... I might not agree with every aspect of the proposal, but it took great courage to put forward something that is as significant as that. I think that there are ideas across the region of how we might pursue peace. I do think that it is impossible for us to think only in terms of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and not think in terms of what's happening with Syria or Iran or Lebanon or Afghanistan and Pakistan."

The Arab Initiative, originally proposed by King Abdullah in 2002 and later adopted by the Arab League, states that Israel would receive ‘normal relations’ with the Arab world in exchange for a full withdrawal from the entire Gaza Strip, West Bank, Golan Heights and eastern Jerusalem, which includes the Temple Mount. In other words the so-called Palestinians, who are actually Arab terrorists kicked out of Jordan in the 60’s, want Israel just to go away.

The West Bank contains important Jewish biblical sites and borders central Israeli population centers, while the Golan Heights looks down on Israeli civilian zones and was twice used by Syria to mount ground invasions into the Jewish state.

The Arab plan also demands the imposition of a non-binding U.N. resolution that calls for so-called Palestinian refugees who wish to move inside Israel to be permitted to do so at the "earliest practicable date."

Palestinians have long demanded the "right of return" for millions of "refugees," a formula Israeli officials across the political spectrum warn is Islamic code speak for Israel's destruction by flooding the Jewish state with millions of Arabs, thereby changing its demographics. This is of course what is ongoing in the west as well, only we, as the Lebanese and the Indonesians were, are too blind and deceived to notice. It is called ‘Stealth Cultural-Jihad’.

When Arab countries attacked the Jewish state after its creation in 1948, some 725,000 Arabs living within Israel's borders fled or were expelled from the area that became Israel. Also at that time, about 820,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries or fled following rampant persecution.

While most Jewish refugees were absorbed by Israel and other countries, the majority of Palestinian Arabs have been maintained in 59 U.N.-run camps that do not seek to settle the Arabs elsewhere. There are currently about 4 million Arabs who claim Palestinian refugee status with the U.N., including children and grandchildren of the original fleeing Arabs, Arabs living full-time in Jordan, and Arabs who long ago emigrated throughout the Middle East and to the West.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Well…I hope you have purchased your prayer rug before the mad rush near the next Ramadan calibration. And Oh! You should also probably bone up on your Arabic.

Purchasing a Hadith and a Quran would also make you look more Multi-Cultural and Tolerant.

Oh... And be sure to practice your Muslim yell “Allah Achbar, and death to the Kaffaar”

And last but not least, please don’t get behind on your Jizya tax (the Dhimmah slave tax) to the Mullah-President Al-Barry.

May God walk before us…

de Andréa

No comments: