Muslims Against Shariah Part I

Now there is an oxymoron if I have ever heard one. A group of Muslims are exercising the doctrine of “Taqiyyah”’ (True Lies) on a blog site called Muslims Against Sharia look it up.

By de Andréa

The name alone, though it sounds like a step in the right direction especially for a Muslim, is diametrically opposed to the Quran. In other words without Shariah law there is no Islam. This is tantamount to advocating ‘Christians against the Ten Commandments and all the teachings of Christ’. What would be left???

If one is only slightly familiar with the history and the teachings of Islam one would see this as a sham and another deception of Islam to get Infidels to accept “Mainstream Islam” as moderate, middle of the road and best of all, your “warm and fuzzy” friend.

The following Homepage right off the site was sent to me by one of my readers, I will attempt to expose the lies behind the truth, which is the tool of “Taqiyyah” a supernatural deception of Allah taught in the Quran. The words in italics are from the web site the rest are mine.

*******

OUR GOALS
To educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed
My response: Question…have you then written a new Quran for Muslims? Bear in mind when Christianity was reformed the Bible was not rewritten.

To educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists)
My response: These are all identities given to Islam by ignorant Westerners, not Muslims.

To educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror.
My response: To educate non Muslims, means to indoctrinate Infidels with Taqiyyah (true lies or deception). As for Muslims are victims, this is because Muslims who aren’t really Muslims are worse than Infidels, they are apostates, and the Quran orders their death.

OUR MANIFESTO
Acknowledging mistakesThe majority of the terrorist acts of the last three decades, including the 9/11 attacks, were perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists in the name of Islam. We, as Muslims, find it abhorrent that Islam is used to murder millions of innocent people, Muslims, and non-Muslims alike.
My response: Approximately when was it discovered that the Quran had been chanced? There are original copies of the Quran dating back to early 700 AD, only 90 years after Allah presented his will and manifesto to his prophet Muhammad. Moreover Islam was infiltrating Europe in the middle of the 8th century for the very same purpose and agenda written on the Quran, more than 300 years before the Crusades began, and that same agenda is being carried out today. The Quran has been corrupted alright, it was corrupt when it was written and has been the same since its inception, and always will be.

Inconsistencies in the KoranUnfortunately, Islamic religious texts, included the Koran and the Hadith contain many passages, which call for Islamic domination and incite violence against non-Muslims. It is time to change that. Muslim fundamentalists believe that the Koran is the literal word of Allah. But could Allah, the most Merciful, the most Compassionate, command mass slaughter of people whose only fault is being non-Muslim?
My response: Who, in their right mind would dare to change what their god has written. If Muslims believe that their god Allah wrote the words in the Quran, and that this is Allah’s will, moreover, it cannot be proved that the Quran was ever changed or corrupted at some time in history, how could his followers just change what He wrote, unless an original manuscript could be found dating back to 610 AD depicting all the ideologies contained in this Manifesto? As far as Allah being Compassionate and Merciful, where is that written in the Quran?

The Koran & the BibleMany Bible figures from Adam to Jesus (Isa) are considered to be prophets and are respected by Islam. Islamic scholars however believe that both the Old and the New Testament came from God, but that they were corrupted by the Jews and Christians over time. Could it be possible that the Koran itself was corrupted by Muslims over the last thirteen centuries?
My response: I am certainly glad to hear that Islamic scholars believe as well as Christians do, that the Bible is the inspired word and the will of God. But at what point in history did both the Jewish Torah and the rest of the Old Testament and the whole New Testament come to all be corrupted. Between two religions and a plethora of documents that must have been quite an organized conspiracy. Moreover you ask the question: “Could it be possible that the Koran itself was corrupted by Muslims over the last thirteen centuries?” Who are you asking, --- me? I would strongly suggest that you find some hard evidence that is contrary to the historical documents that already exist, before you create a new religion and a new god.

The need for reform Islam, in its present form, is not compatible with principles of freedom and democracy. Twenty-first century Muslims have two options: we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century perpetuated by Hassan al-Banna, Abdullah Azzam, Yassir Arafat, Ruhollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Hamas, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, etc., leading to a global war between Dar al-Islam (Islamic World) and Dar al-Harb (non-Islamic World), or we can reform Islam to keep our rich cultural heritage and to cleanse our religion from the reviled relics of the past. We, as Muslims who desire to live in harmony with people of other religions, agnostics, and atheists choose the latter option. We can no longer allow Islamic extremists to use our religion as a weapon. We must protect future generations of Muslims from being brainwashed by the Islamic radicals. If we do not stop the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, our children will become homicidal zombies.
My response: Oh…Wow! I couldn’t improve on that paragraph if I tried… a classic example of ”Taqiyyah”---and a true statement if I have ever read one. The problem that I have with it and you should as well, is the part: “we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century” You see Islam was born in the seventh century, Allah appeared to Muhammad as the angel Gabriel and gave him the words of the Quran in 610 AD, the Seventh Century… And yes, as you say, if we do not stop the spread of Islam our children will become homicidal zombies--- and the world, which is the agenda of Islam written all through the Quran, will be dominated by Shariah law and Islamic oppression. Moreover these modern figures and organizations did not originate the murderous agenda of Islam, Allah did in the Quran.

.Accepting responsibilities:To start the healing process, we must acknowledge evils done by Muslims in the name of Islam and accept responsibility for those evils. We must remove evil passages from Islamic religious texts, so that future generations of Muslims will not be confused by conflicting messages. Our religious message should be loud and clear: Islam is peace; Islam is love; Islam is light. War, murder, violence, divisiveness, & discrimination are not Islamic values.
My response: Acknowledging evil goes without saying, but just how do you plan on accepting responsibly for all the death and terror and destruction in the world for the past 1400 years of Islam’s existence? Removing Shariah law from the Quran and all the evil from Islam isn’t going to cut it.

It isn’t going to bring back Daniel Pearl an American journalists beheaded in the most gross and torturous way just because he was an American and believed in freedom. It isn’t going to bring back the lives of American merchants 200 years ago off the coast of Tripoli. It isn’t going tobring back the lives of European women tortured to death before the time of the Crusades, just because they had been raped by Muslims or refused to ware a Hijaab. It isn’t going to bring back the lives of the Christian Lebanese who were stopped on the road to Beirut in the 1970’s and executed just because it said on their drivers license that they were Christian. It isn’t going to bring back all the lives of those murdered in Darfur simply because they were there. And it certainly isn’t going to bring back the 3000 people who died on 9/11 2001. No--- by creating a new religion out of an old theocracy you aren’t going to change anything. Writing a new Quran isn’t the answer, you said that Islam should reflect peace love and light, something not found in the Quran or in the entire Nation of Islam, but guess what…those values are already found in the Bible. Jesus taught them to his disciples. Peace, Love and Light cannot come out of a Nation or from a god of War, Hate, and darkness. [Read , Because They Hate, by Brigitte Gabriel. ] Those values come only from Jehovah the God of all, The God of love, the Creator of all things. Wouldn’t it be more sensible to join a religion that has been teaching those values since before Islam existed, and where one doesn’t have to die for one own sins because God's son Jesus already forgave you and died for you?

Religious privacyReligion is the private matter of every individual. Any person should be able to freely practice any religion as long as the practice does not interfere with the local laws, and no person must be forced to practice any religion. Just as people are created equal, there is no one religion that is superior to another. Any set of beliefs that is spread by force is fundamentally immoral; it is no longer a religion, but a political ideology
My response: Again, for the most part, true, except religion is not usually a private matter although it should be a personal matter of adoption. And never by force, something that is not taught in the Quran, but again is taught in the Christian Bible. However the Statement “there is no one religion that is superior to another.” Is false, heaven is not like Paris France, where all roads lead. If one wants to go to heaven, one must pay the price which is death and dead people don’t go to heaven. But you see God made a way, one must only repent and accept that the payment has been made, even for an ex-Muslim, by God’s only son Jesus Christ. He paid the price for ex-Muslims, ex-Buddhists, ex-Hindus, ex-everybody, even Christians and Jews.

EqualityIslam is one of the many of the world's religions. There will be no Peace and Harmony in the World if Muslims and non-Muslims do not have equal rights. Islamic supremacy doctrine is just as repulsive as Aryan supremacy doctrine. History clearly shows what happens to the society whose members consider themselves above other peoples. All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy.
My response: That moves in the right direction, but as usual it doesn’t go far enough. It should read –there will be no Peace and Harmony as long as there are Muslims. There have been Muslims for 1398 years and for 1398 years there has been no peace and harmony between Muslims and anyone in the rest of the world. And the part: “All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy. You must eliminate the word “moderate” so it will read-- All Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy and dominance.
ShariaSharia Law must be abolished, because it is incompatible with norms of modern society. My response: Again I agree, but I still can’t help but wonder, what of Islam is left, after one abandons Shariah and all the evil of the Quran? My answer—Christianity.

Outdated practicesAny practices that might have been acceptable in the Seventh Century; i.e., stoning, cutting off body parts, marrying and/or having sex with children or animals, must be condemned by every Muslim.
My response: This goes without saying; however when, where and by whom, in the seventh century was the rape of a child or having sex with animals ever accepted by anyone except Islam? And how is a nation that is stuck in the 7th century going to condemn and abolish all practices that are derived from their “holy book” in the 7th century and still have a religion.

Outdated verses click on thisThe following verses promote divisiveness and religious hatred, bigotry and discrimination. They must be either removed from the Koran or declared outdated and invalid, and marked as such.

Outdated words & phrasesUse of the following words and phrases or their variations must be prohibited during religious services:

• Infidel / Unbeliever: these terms have negative connotation and promote divisiveness and animosity; Islam is not the only religion

• Jihad: this word is often interpreted as Holy War against non-Muslims

• Mujaheed / Holy Warrior: no more wars in the name of Islam

• American (Christian / Crusader / Israeli / Zionist) occupation: these terms promote bigotry; at this point in time, Muslims living in non-Muslim lands have more freedoms than Muslims living in Muslim lands

Islam vs. violenceIslam has no place for violence. Any person calling for an act of violence in the name of Islam must be promptly excommunicated. Any grievances must be addressed by lawful authorities. It is the religious and civic duty of every Muslim to unconditionally condemn any act of terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam. Any Muslim group that has ties to terrorism in any way, shape, or form, must be universally condemned by both religious and secular Muslims.
My only comment is a question: What is a secular Muslim? Islam is full of contradictions isn’t it?

Portrayal of ProphetsWhile portrayal of Prophets is not an acceptable practice in Islam could be personally offensive to some Muslims, other religions do not have such restrictions. Therefore, the portrayal of the Prophets must be treated as a manifestation of free expression. My response: This is another contradiction to Islam, freedom of any kind, on any level is contrary to the very basic core foundation of Islam.

The Crusades vs. The InquisitionWhile the Inquisition was a repulsive practice by Christian Fundamentalists, the Crusades were not unprovoked acts of aggression, but rather attempts to recapture formerly Christian lands controlled by Muslims.
My response: The Inquisitions may have been repulsive but they were conducted by the Catholic Church, because Islam was repulsive. Moreover the Crusades were not just “to recapture formerly Christian lands controlled by Muslims”, but to stop the Jihad that was perpetrated by Islam all over Europe just as it is today, it actually has never stopped. Moreover it will never stop as long as there are Muslims.

Brothers and Sisters!Do not make the next generation of Muslims clean up your mess!Fight Islamic Fascism now, so your children won't have to!
**********

THE BOTTOM LINE: This whole concept sounds commendable and may even appeal to some ignorant Westerners who have no understanding of Islam. However, by gutting the religion of Islam as this manifesto suggests, would leave Islam without a god, without any foundation, without an agenda, without a mission, without identification, without a future, basically, without a religion.

Moreover if, as this manifesto implies, that Islam would replace all the evil and lies in Islam with good a truth, well… one would have a religion resembling Christianity.

I suggest that Christians read the Quran in order to gain an understanding of who their enemy is. And I suggest that Muslims read the Bible before they make plans to recreate a bad ideology, otherwise Islam will never be anything more than what it is. And Christians will just continue to be enablers of the evil Nation of Islam.

I hope as you read this manifesto that you click on the heading, [Outdated verses] and read at least some of what the Quran teaches. It may help you become somewhat aware of why Muslims do what they do. And these verses aren’t outdated, they are just evil.

And finally, I make a similar appeal as do the “Muslims Against Sharia”.
Brothers and Sisters! Do not make the next generation of Christians clean up your mess! Fight Islam now, so your children won't have to! [Watch Videos]

de Andréa