Clarity denied in Holy Land Foundation mistrial
By de Andréa
Those of you that have been following my articles about the so-called Islamic Charitable Organizations, as well as every other Muslim terrorist organization here in the U.S. that we stupidly turn a blind eye to---I have bad, but predictable news. We tried these sons of Satan in a U.S. criminal court instead of a military court so it was as I said it would be, a fiasco.
What a disappointment the mistrial in the Holy Land Foundation federal trial. What the public wanted was clarity and closure in this long-running case. Why we tried a case of treason, anywhere but a military court is outrageous. Forget trying to find 12 people, we are not going to find even 3 people that are cognoscente of what Islam is doing to this country.
What the jury delivered after 19 days of deliberation – and an additional four-day delay in unsealing the verdicts – was of course, confusion. So profound was the confusion that Judge Joe A. Fish seemed startled when he opened the sealed verdicts only to discover that the jury had left most of the counts blank. The jury seemed bizarrely unsure of what it had even decided. Small wonder Judge Fish declared a mistrial.
Family members of the five defendants in the terror finance case – in which the government accused the defendants of covertly but consciously raising money for America’s enemy the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas – were jubilant after the judge declared the mistrial. However, their joy may be premature. Prosecutors have pledged to retry the case. Four of the five defendants likely will have to return to federal court to begin the entire process all over again. Now this is exactly what Einstein was referring to when he said, “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result”… ahahah…
The non-verdict on most of the counts was a serious blow to government prosecutors, who have had a decidedly negative record in prosecuting terrorist fundraising cases since Sept. 11, 2001. The Holy Land Foundation case was by far their most important prosecution to date. The feds tried to hit the broad side of the barn – and missed. Close observers of the proceedings like yours truly, saw this coming. The government tried, but did a poor job of making a complicated white-collar case of treason understandable to ordinary citizens who often seemed perplexed and overwhelmed by an avalanche of facts and data. As one trial watcher said, “it was like seeing his rural East Texas grandmother struggle through a graduate-level seminar in modern Middle Eastern politics”. This trial should have never taken place in a civil court.
Whether or not there was a conviction, evidence from wiretaps and videotapes, was condemning for the Hamas fundraising defendant, Mufid Abdulqader a Muslim infiltrator who had successfully infiltrated the Dallas city government, he was a Dallas city engineer who chanted, "Death to the Jews” – this was of course morally damning for defendants who claimed to be “humanitarians”. This is part of the Muslim deception that few understand; nowhere in the Quran or the Muslim faith is there any humanitarianism, benevolence, charity or love.
Moreover, the government introduced evidence showing how the infrastructure of many major U.S. Muslim so-called charitable organizations were tied together, and how they have their philosophical roots in the radical Muslim Brotherhood. terrorist organization that support Islamic terrorist training camps.
This newspaper's reporting, as well as the preponderance of the evidence, strongly suggests that the Holy Land Foundation was no more a charity than a Wahhabistic Mullah. Going forward, the government must change its flawed strategy if it hopes to prevail and try this case quickly in a military court where the prosecutors aren’t in bondage to civilian rules or depend on deceived jurors.
It doesn't matter how many facts prosecutors marshal together, if they cannot produce a coherent, persuasive narrative that a jury of 12 deceived people can understand. A hung jury does nothing to satisfy justice.
The intricacies of the infiltrating web of Muslim terrorist organizations in America (as detailed in Books such as Because They Hate by Brigitte Gabriel, Infiltration by Paul Sperry, American Jihad by Steven Emerson, Holy War on the Home Front by Harvey Kushner, Islam Exposed by de Andréa and other books on this subject) has served to make it difficult to track and expose terrorist activities by such groups. The federal government is to be commended for tackling this arduous challenge, but as I said even before the trial began, an obvious change of menu is in order.
THE BOTTOM LINE: It seems to me that we could intelligently take a lesson from President Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he, as distastefully as it was, prophylacticly interned the enemy of this country in camps. Now I know I am going to receive a lot of flack for even suggesting such a politically incorrect idea, but it is far better to step on someone’s metatarsus than to be stepped on by Islam, the enemy of this world. Politically incorrect or not, we are fighting for our survival, and so far, we are losing…
de Andréa
By de Andréa
Those of you that have been following my articles about the so-called Islamic Charitable Organizations, as well as every other Muslim terrorist organization here in the U.S. that we stupidly turn a blind eye to---I have bad, but predictable news. We tried these sons of Satan in a U.S. criminal court instead of a military court so it was as I said it would be, a fiasco.
What a disappointment the mistrial in the Holy Land Foundation federal trial. What the public wanted was clarity and closure in this long-running case. Why we tried a case of treason, anywhere but a military court is outrageous. Forget trying to find 12 people, we are not going to find even 3 people that are cognoscente of what Islam is doing to this country.
What the jury delivered after 19 days of deliberation – and an additional four-day delay in unsealing the verdicts – was of course, confusion. So profound was the confusion that Judge Joe A. Fish seemed startled when he opened the sealed verdicts only to discover that the jury had left most of the counts blank. The jury seemed bizarrely unsure of what it had even decided. Small wonder Judge Fish declared a mistrial.
Family members of the five defendants in the terror finance case – in which the government accused the defendants of covertly but consciously raising money for America’s enemy the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas – were jubilant after the judge declared the mistrial. However, their joy may be premature. Prosecutors have pledged to retry the case. Four of the five defendants likely will have to return to federal court to begin the entire process all over again. Now this is exactly what Einstein was referring to when he said, “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result”… ahahah…
The non-verdict on most of the counts was a serious blow to government prosecutors, who have had a decidedly negative record in prosecuting terrorist fundraising cases since Sept. 11, 2001. The Holy Land Foundation case was by far their most important prosecution to date. The feds tried to hit the broad side of the barn – and missed. Close observers of the proceedings like yours truly, saw this coming. The government tried, but did a poor job of making a complicated white-collar case of treason understandable to ordinary citizens who often seemed perplexed and overwhelmed by an avalanche of facts and data. As one trial watcher said, “it was like seeing his rural East Texas grandmother struggle through a graduate-level seminar in modern Middle Eastern politics”. This trial should have never taken place in a civil court.
Whether or not there was a conviction, evidence from wiretaps and videotapes, was condemning for the Hamas fundraising defendant, Mufid Abdulqader a Muslim infiltrator who had successfully infiltrated the Dallas city government, he was a Dallas city engineer who chanted, "Death to the Jews” – this was of course morally damning for defendants who claimed to be “humanitarians”. This is part of the Muslim deception that few understand; nowhere in the Quran or the Muslim faith is there any humanitarianism, benevolence, charity or love.
Moreover, the government introduced evidence showing how the infrastructure of many major U.S. Muslim so-called charitable organizations were tied together, and how they have their philosophical roots in the radical Muslim Brotherhood. terrorist organization that support Islamic terrorist training camps.
This newspaper's reporting, as well as the preponderance of the evidence, strongly suggests that the Holy Land Foundation was no more a charity than a Wahhabistic Mullah. Going forward, the government must change its flawed strategy if it hopes to prevail and try this case quickly in a military court where the prosecutors aren’t in bondage to civilian rules or depend on deceived jurors.
It doesn't matter how many facts prosecutors marshal together, if they cannot produce a coherent, persuasive narrative that a jury of 12 deceived people can understand. A hung jury does nothing to satisfy justice.
The intricacies of the infiltrating web of Muslim terrorist organizations in America (as detailed in Books such as Because They Hate by Brigitte Gabriel, Infiltration by Paul Sperry, American Jihad by Steven Emerson, Holy War on the Home Front by Harvey Kushner, Islam Exposed by de Andréa and other books on this subject) has served to make it difficult to track and expose terrorist activities by such groups. The federal government is to be commended for tackling this arduous challenge, but as I said even before the trial began, an obvious change of menu is in order.
THE BOTTOM LINE: It seems to me that we could intelligently take a lesson from President Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he, as distastefully as it was, prophylacticly interned the enemy of this country in camps. Now I know I am going to receive a lot of flack for even suggesting such a politically incorrect idea, but it is far better to step on someone’s metatarsus than to be stepped on by Islam, the enemy of this world. Politically incorrect or not, we are fighting for our survival, and so far, we are losing…
de Andréa
Posts
1 comment:
Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!
Post a Comment