Profiling The Obama Code
Is it Obama’s agenda - to be
dictator of the U.S.
or maybe even of the world?
By de Andréa
March 25, 2013
For years now, and despite of a lot
of flack for saying so, I have been suggesting that Obama has aspirations to be
a powerful Hitleresque type dictator. I
have said this for two main reasons… First
it is his background… and second…because of what he says and does.
And now I have discovered a forensic
profiler who worked on the disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the
double-murder case against O.J. Simpson among countless other crimes, who says:
“he is more than alarmed by some of the
references President Obama has been using”.
Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who wrote the
book titled: “The
Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” said Obama’s statement “I am not a dictator” actually
meant, “I am the dictator president.” Hodges also concluded “Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing
the 2012 election.” Something that I have written about and has
been very evident all along.
On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston ,
Clear Lake , has written that Hodges’ technique
is “becoming
the cutting edge of forensic science. Dr.
Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case
indicates that his ‘thought-print decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact,
becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal
investigators.”
Dr. Hodges is not new to the field,
already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and
police interviews to spot secret confessions.
He decoded Simpson’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson
had committed a double murder. He also
decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
Profiling The Obama Code
In his newest analysis, he looks
further into Obama’s statements in his press conference about the sequester
issue in which he berated Republicans for
not doing what he wants.
When asked whether he couldn’t have
pushed negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, “I
can’t have Secret Service block the doorway.’”
Hodges explained. “He suggests the secret wish to block the
Republicans from the door to the government.
Failing to negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush
Republicans to gain total control of the government after the 2014 election. His ‘have Secret Service’ image further
suggests a desire to totally control major government law enforcement agencies–
to block any opposition,” Hodges said.
“The frightening image ‘of blocking the doorway’ to those who oppose
him suggests progressively ideas of imprisonment/forced containment, and a
picture of martial law. Extreme? Likely so for now but equally a potential
major warning of his true intent – if everything fell into place,” he
said.
But Hodges noted objective actions
that fit the pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6 billion rounds
of ammunition, the estimated 145,000 federal agents with firearm- carry
authority and the 65,000 agents for the Department of Homeland Security alone which
I have written extensively about.
Then, he said, “There’s the report that a Minnesota company was
selling to the federal government - cutout targets custom designed to ‘desensitize police’ to ‘nontraditional threat targets.” So what were these graphics? “The
targets included pregnant women, children, older people, and other civilians in
neighborhood settings – all holding guns.
The company reported law enforcement designed and ordered the targets.” In your wildest imagination, who in law
enforcement needs desensitization to such targets…unless Obama is planning a
war against all American citizens?
Hodges noted that even activists on
the left have expressed concern. Medea
Benjamin, co-founder of the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio
interview with host Aaron Klein, called the potential abuse by the Obama
administration’s huge domestic police power “extremely troubling.”
Recall Obama’s earlier words which, he
made spontaneously, strongly pointing toward an unconscious confession. “‘We’ve got to have a civilian national
security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as
the military.’ What exactly was he
thinking and why? Undeniably this was
extreme: a civilian force just as well funded and strong as our military –
implying majorly armed. The question is
what exactly was Obama secretly confessing about his future plans? His unconscious super
intelligence suggests a warning from a very dangerous Obama,” Hodges contends.
The violent imagery statements Obama
used in his first inaugural stunned Hodges.
He cited “sacrifices borne by our ancestors,” “perils we can scarcely imagine,”
“stained with blood,” “earlier generations faced down fascism …with missiles
and tanks … and enduring convictions.” And
Obama’s references to “leaders” include: “those who seek to advance their aims by
inducing terror and slaughtering innocents,” “leaders … who seek to sow
conflict, or blame their … ills on the West” and “the oath is taken amidst
gathering clouds and raging storms.”
Hodges the profiler said Obama’s
behavior “shouts at us.” It sure does, and I have been
shouting it at America
for years. “The
background of murderous drone attacks he personally took delight in supervising
– a suggestion of just how furious he is,” he wrote, noting Obama’s “pattern” of weakening the U.S. militarily
and citizens individually by cutting budgets and restricting gun rights.
“Throw into the mix the seemingly extreme idea of
using drones on the American people but still a possibility and we have yet
another issue of war against the citizens,” Hodges said. “Sen.
Rand Paul, R-Ky., staged a nearly 13-hour filibuster because Obama refused to
confirm for him that Americans on U.S. soil would not be killed by
Obama-ordered drone strikes.”
“Remember,
too, Obama was an Alinsky trainer. And
Alinsky’s motto was “trick” – deception from within – followed by revolution
and social chaos,” Hodges said. “One thing we can say for certain is that America is in a
very precarious place. And such an angry wounded president arming a civilian
force to the maximum when speaking of an apocalypse, evil on the horizon and a
dictator president – along with his need to control law enforcement – presents
an extreme warning.”
Hodges previously noted Obama’s
reference to two sci-fi movies. “He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a ‘Jedi
mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’
used on weak-minded foes (‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games
to trick subservient foolish Americans.” His spontaneous ‘Star Wars’ image also
references his war on the Republicans – efforts to discredit them so that he
can affect the next election and control both houses of Congress in his
dictatorial behavior. (He also suggests
his war on the military – to weaken it.)
“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique
he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it if we know how – just
as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’ would let others read his mind to provide
them with special insightful messages,” Hodges said.
He suggested Obama has been
exaggerating the impact of the sequester to “unconsciously paint a true
picture of his overall destructive plan.”
Hodges also suggested Obama is
revealing a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to be an apocalypse.”
“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he
could do something else ]‘to make these guys not paint horns on my head’] we
indeed should be frightened beyond belief.
He suggests America
is in for a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he harbors evil
intentions,” Hodges said.
THE BOTTOM LINE: (A little Personal) If you would go
back into my archives and read everything that I have said about Obama since he
was a child then a collage student to a Chicago legislator and on to the present,
it would seem as though Dr Hodges has been reading my articles. It is either that or I am a lot more
intuitive than I thought or have been given credit for. I mean this guy is a trained Forensic Psychologist,
a Criminal Profiler. If nothing else it
is sure supportive of what I have been, as I said at the beginning, saying for
years about Obama, that at the time seemed almost no one else could see. At times I felt a little lonely out there
when many were calling me a loony tune conspiracy theorist nut. But I know what I know! Moreover I will write the truth as I see it
even if no one will read it. It is
interesting how the truth divides people, I would rather it bring people together.
But I do feel less alone knowing there
is someone with credibility out in the either that is respected and has discovered
the same ‘Obama Code’ that I have.
Dr Hodges, Professor Steven A. Egger
and I agree, Obama is dangerous to children and other living things...
While I certainly do not want to derogate
my faithful readers, it is sure nice to be validated and have a little support
from the academics for a change.
Thanks for listing – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013
by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment