Profiling The Obama Code
Is it Obama’s agenda - to be dictator of the
or maybe even of the world? U.S.
By de Andréa
March 25, 2013
For years now, and despite of a lot of flack for saying so, I have been suggesting that Obama has aspirations to be a powerful Hitleresque type dictator. I have said this for two main reasons… First it is his background… and second…because of what he says and does.
And now I have discovered a forensic profiler who worked on the disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the double-murder case against O.J. Simpson among countless other crimes, who says: “he is more than alarmed by some of the references President Obama has been using”.
Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who wrote the book titled: “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” said Obama’s statement “I am not a dictator” actually meant, “I am the dictator president.” Hodges also concluded “Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.” Something that I have written about and has been very evident all along.
On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the
University of Houston,
, has written that Hodges’ technique
the cutting edge of forensic science. Dr.
Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case
indicates that his ‘thought-print decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact,
becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal
investigators.” Clear Lake
Dr. Hodges is not new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded Simpson’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He also decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
Profiling The Obama Code
In his newest analysis, he looks further into Obama’s statements in his press conference about the sequester issue in which he berated Republicans for not doing what he wants.
When asked whether he couldn’t have pushed negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, “I can’t have Secret Service block the doorway.’”
Hodges explained. “He suggests the secret wish to block the Republicans from the door to the government. Failing to negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush Republicans to gain total control of the government after the 2014 election. His ‘have Secret Service’ image further suggests a desire to totally control major government law enforcement agencies– to block any opposition,” Hodges said. “The frightening image ‘of blocking the doorway’ to those who oppose him suggests progressively ideas of imprisonment/forced containment, and a picture of martial law. Extreme? Likely so for now but equally a potential major warning of his true intent – if everything fell into place,” he said.
But Hodges noted objective actions that fit the pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition, the estimated 145,000 federal agents with firearm- carry authority and the 65,000 agents for the Department of Homeland Security alone which I have written extensively about.
Then, he said, “There’s the report that a
selling to the federal government - cutout targets custom designed to ‘desensitize police’ to ‘nontraditional threat targets.” So what were these graphics? “The
targets included pregnant women, children, older people, and other civilians in
neighborhood settings – all holding guns.
The company reported law enforcement designed and ordered the targets.” In your wildest imagination, who in law
enforcement needs desensitization to such targets…unless Obama is planning a
war against all American citizens? Minnesota
Hodges noted that even activists on the left have expressed concern. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio interview with host Aaron Klein, called the potential abuse by the Obama administration’s huge domestic police power “extremely troubling.”
Recall Obama’s earlier words which, he made spontaneously, strongly pointing toward an unconscious confession. “‘We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as the military.’ What exactly was he thinking and why? Undeniably this was extreme: a civilian force just as well funded and strong as our military – implying majorly armed. The question is what exactly was Obama secretly confessing about his future plans? His unconscious super intelligence suggests a warning from a very dangerous Obama,” Hodges contends.
The violent imagery statements Obama used in his first inaugural stunned Hodges. He cited “sacrifices borne by our ancestors,” “perils we can scarcely imagine,” “stained with blood,” “earlier generations faced down fascism …with missiles and tanks … and enduring convictions.” And Obama’s references to “leaders” include: “those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents,” “leaders … who seek to sow conflict, or blame their … ills on the West” and “the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms.”
Hodges the profiler said Obama’s behavior “shouts at us.” It sure does, and I have been shouting it at
for years. “The
background of murderous drone attacks he personally took delight in supervising
– a suggestion of just how furious he is,” he wrote, noting Obama’s “pattern” of weakening the militarily
and citizens individually by cutting budgets and restricting gun rights. U.S.
“Throw into the mix the seemingly extreme idea of using drones on the American people but still a possibility and we have yet another issue of war against the citizens,” Hodges said. “Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., staged a nearly 13-hour filibuster because Obama refused to confirm for him that Americans on
soil would not be killed by
Obama-ordered drone strikes.” U.S.
“Remember, too, Obama was an Alinsky trainer. And Alinsky’s motto was “trick” – deception from within – followed by revolution and social chaos,” Hodges said. “One thing we can say for certain is that
is in a
very precarious place. And such an angry wounded president arming a civilian
force to the maximum when speaking of an apocalypse, evil on the horizon and a
dictator president – along with his need to control law enforcement – presents
an extreme warning.” America
Hodges previously noted Obama’s reference to two sci-fi movies. “He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a ‘Jedi mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’ used on weak-minded foes (‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games to trick subservient foolish Americans.” His spontaneous ‘Star Wars’ image also references his war on the Republicans – efforts to discredit them so that he can affect the next election and control both houses of Congress in his dictatorial behavior. (He also suggests his war on the military – to weaken it.)
“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it if we know how – just as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’ would let others read his mind to provide them with special insightful messages,” Hodges said.
He suggested Obama has been exaggerating the impact of the sequester to “unconsciously paint a true picture of his overall destructive plan.”
Hodges also suggested Obama is revealing a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to be an apocalypse.”
“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he could do something else ]‘to make these guys not paint horns on my head’] we indeed should be frightened beyond belief. He suggests
is in for a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he harbors evil
intentions,” Hodges said. America
THE BOTTOM LINE: (A little Personal) If you would go back into my archives and read everything that I have said about Obama since he was a child then a collage student to a Chicago legislator and on to the present, it would seem as though Dr Hodges has been reading my articles. It is either that or I am a lot more intuitive than I thought or have been given credit for. I mean this guy is a trained Forensic Psychologist, a Criminal Profiler. If nothing else it is sure supportive of what I have been, as I said at the beginning, saying for years about Obama, that at the time seemed almost no one else could see. At times I felt a little lonely out there when many were calling me a loony tune conspiracy theorist nut. But I know what I know! Moreover I will write the truth as I see it even if no one will read it. It is interesting how the truth divides people, I would rather it bring people together. But I do feel less alone knowing there is someone with credibility out in the either that is respected and has discovered the same ‘Obama Code’ that I have.
Dr Hodges, Professor Steven A. Egger and I agree, Obama is dangerous to children and other living things...
While I certainly do not want to derogate my faithful readers, it is sure nice to be validated and have a little support from the academics for a change.
Thanks for listing – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.