Tuesday, March 05, 2013

Obama: Children Have No Rights

Obama: Children Have No Rights
To take this view one cannot be consistent with the founding principles of the Declaration of Independence nor the U.S. Constitution.  But then - when did Chairman Obama ever respect his oath of Office?

By de Andréa
March 5, 2013

The U.S. Declaration recognizes the ultimate authority of God’s Natural Law and says, “All men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”  Obama’s Communist Justice Department must advance the assumption that natural law and Nature’s God give children no right to a mother and father and no right not to be legally taken by the government to be raised unnaturally by them, or by surrogate homosexuals.

It is no mystery that the left wing liberal communists believe that children have no human rights; I mean they lust for killing them before they can even exercise their God given rights.

The Obama Criminal Department of Injustice is arguing before the United States Supreme Court that children do not need mothers.  I can only assume that Chairman Obama considers the Government to be endowed with parental power.  After all Chairman Obama has issued orders to the DOJ to illegally ignore the DOMA Act, even though the law was passed overwhelmingly by both houses of Congress and was signed in to law by President Bill Clinton.  See article titled “Christians Are Criminals.”  So who is violating the law and who is the criminal here? 

The Justice Department’s argument of the superfluity of motherhood is presented in a brief that the Obama Regime filed in the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8.  Prop 8 is the California ballot initiative that amended California’s State Constitution to say that marriage involves only one man and one woman and is completely in line with the Federal Law of (DOMA) the Defense of Marriage Act.

“The United States will address the following question presented by this case:  Whether Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” 

Interestingly, the only way California’s Proposition 8 could possibly violate the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause would be to assume Homosexuals were equal.  So the question should be are Homosexuals Equal to so-called Straight people.   Webster’s Dictionary defines Equal as “The same as”  Now homosexuals may be a lot of things but to say that they are Equal or the same as natural straight human beings is certainly not one of them.  They even “Pride” themselves has being different, hence “Gay Pride”.  The use of the word STRAIGHT by the homosexual community tells me they consider heterosexuals straight or normal and that homosexuality is bent’ or abnormal and so cannot be construed as the same or equal.  The conclusion can only be that they do not except our’ “equal rights under the law” of nature, and so the real issue is, that they want special, separate or unequal rights that are not identified by any document in the history of America.  As a matter of fact it is against the Constitution to grant special groups of people special rights.  But then that is just the law plus reason and logic!  

The Justice Department presented its conclusions about parenthood in rebutting an argument made by proponents of Proposition 8 that the traditional two-parent family, led by both a mother and a father, was the ideal place, determined even by nature itself, to raise a child.

The Communist Obama regime argues this is not true.  It argues that children need neither a father nor a mother and that having two fathers or two mothers is just as good as having one of each.  This of course is right out of Karl Marx where the State is considered the legal parent.

The [California] Voter Guide arguably offered a distinct but related child-rearing justification for Proposition 8: “the best situation for a child is to be raised by a married mother and father,”  The Obama brief submitted to the court by Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.  says: “The weight of the scientific literature strongly supports the view that same-sex parents are just as capable as opposite-sex parents.”  To support this argument, one of the Psychobabble documents the Obama Regime cites is a policy statement” by the [un-]American Psychological Association.  This statement claims that some studies indicate same-sex parents ‘might’ be “superior” to mother-and-father families, but then concedes there is little actual data on the results of raising children in two-father households.  There is actually no ‘long term studies’ on this issue at all.

The Communist Obama regime further argues that because California law already permits domestic partnerships in which same-sex couples are allowed all the "incidents” of marriage--including the right to adopt children and be foster parents--that Proposition 8 only denies same-sex couples the use of the word "marriage" and does not change the status of child-rearing in the state.  My opinion is, we should deny homosexuals the use of the common English word “GAY” as well.

 “In light of California’s conferral of full rights of parenting and child-rearing on same-sex couples, Proposition 8’s denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry bears no cognizable relation, let alone a substantial one, to any interest in responsible procreation and child-rearing (however defined),” says the DOJ,  “Indeed, because a substantial number of California children are raised in households headed by same-sex couples.”  In effect, the Obama Regime is arguing that California had already conceded the point that children do not need a mother or a father when it enacted laws treating same-sex couples the same as married couples in its adoption, foster-parenting and other laws--which Proposition 8 did not seek to overturn.  Well…Obama, I could write another petition stating that as well, if you wish!  Maybe if the [un-]American Psychological Association would do a long term study on the effects of children brought up by homosexuals it would reveal why California is such a magnet for Marxist Homosexuals.   

So far in the history of the human race, no child has ever been born without a biological father and mother.  Now, in the Supreme Court of the United States, the Kremlin is arguing that, regardless of the natural biological facts of parenthood, States have no legitimate and defensible interest in ensuring that children conceived by a mother and a father are in fact raised by mothers and fathers.

The brief that the Justice Department presented to the Supreme Court discussed children only as items that are controlled by others, not as individual human beings who have God-given rights of their own.  It simply assumes that a child has no inherent right to a mother or father or anything else for that matter.  If a human child is not in fact a human, but just an “idem” then one can see how these sick criminals can easily go to the next step of murdering more than 50 million innocent human children if they are just considered nothing but “IDEMS”.
THE BOTTOM LINE: As I said at the beginning…the Declaration of Independence recognizes the ultimate authority of God’s Natural Law and says, “All men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”  Obama’s Communist Justice Department must advance the assumption that natural law and Nature’s God give children no right to a mother and father and no right not to be legally handed over by the government to be raised unnaturally by them, or surrogate homosexual couples.  And if some sick people choose not to be “The Same As” or equal to the rest of humanity then how can they at the same time demand Equal Rights under an equal law that is only for “Equal People” created equally…  Homosexuals have made the choice for themselves, they can’t make that choice for the rest of us.

If our government were either a Democracy or a Republic this would not be happening.  But alas it is neither…it is happening because our government has turned the corner of despotism.  Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

No comments: