Sunday, March 24, 2013

Traditional Segregationists

Traditional Segregationists
Traditional Marriage is a union between a man and a woman, at the most intimate and basic levels.

By de Andréa
March 24, 2013

Marriage is not traditional because a group of people decided to make it so.  It’s traditional because God made it so.  He made men and women biologically suitable, that is what makes it so.  The two became “one flesh” (Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:5; Mark 10:7–8; 1 Cor. 6:16; Eph. 5:31).  Is the U.S. Supreme Court going to try to overrule God and everything that is natural?

And’ beyond that my friend, it is the only way to procreate and insure the future of the species.  If we left the world up to homosexuality, humanity would obviously become extinct.  

Just because people do something the same way over and over for a long period of time does not make something fundamentally and morally traditional.  I mean people steal, rape, and murder, but no one would call these actions morally and fundamentally traditional.  If marriage is not a God-ordained institution, then all this talk about marriage is useless, no matter who does what.

And of course, if we go down this road, then there’s nothing that has any principled foundation in law.  The State could determine that products of conception between two biological carbon units are the property of the State.  If the State can determine that property is ultimately owned by the State, then who’s to say that children can’t be put in the same category?  Well…that shows you how far down the wrong road we’ve traveled, the State has already tried that…

What I am trying to say is the State does not define marriage.  That’s already been done.  The creator of nature and science has already done that.

At a time in our culture when religion is out and anything but religion is in, I’m not sure why homosexuals are pushing for a Christian recognized marriage since it’s a relationship rooted in God.  The same God that describes homosexuality as a perversion also defines marriage as being between one man and one woman as well as the Federal law DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, (DOMA).

Any young person who has an elementary understanding of biology knows that the sex organs are not compatible between men and men and women and women.  They just don’t fit my friend.  I wish some opponent of homosexuality would explain this elementary bit of natural science to them and just state the obvious.  I mean, come on!  This is basic birds and bees stuff.

I would also like someone to point out that during the AIDS crisis that the disease was predominately in the homosexual community.  Yes I know, there were also innocent victims of AIDS.  I had a cousin who was transfused with tainted blood and died of aids before her 10th birthday.  There are exceptions that prove the rule.

Then there are the general mortality rates of homosexual and bi-sexual men when compared to the general population.  “In the U.S., recent research has identified HIV/AIDS as the leading cause of death among men aged 25–44 in several states including New York, New Jersey, California, Florida, and Massachusetts.

It’s no wonder, therefore, that proponents of homosexual marriage are going off the logical rails in order to defend the indefensible.  The latest charge is that anti-homosexual marriage advocates are like racial segregationists”.

Openly homosexual Don Lemon of CNN compared opponents of same-sex marriage with opponents of interracial marriage, he said:  “People felt the same way about interracial marriage as some people today feel about homosexual marriage. People didn’t agree with interracial marriage.  People didn’t think black people should vote.  People didn’t think women should vote.  Did that make it right?  Should you respect that viewpoint?”

First Mr. Lemon I would like to point out that you are shockingly ignorant.  That being said, there is’ a difference between race, gender and what people do sexually.  Homosexuals cannot produce offspring unless they find someone from the ‘opposite sex’ to supply the needed sperm or egg.  It’s not a matter of race or gender or’ what a person is by nature, but what people of all races and both genders do sexually.  Sexual distinctions are not made in terms of race when it comes to adultery, pedophilia, polygamy, rape, child molestation, and mother-daughter, mother-son, father-son, father-daughter marriages that are a logical extension of the way homosexual marriage advocates argue for their view. I hope that clears it up just a bit for you Don!

David Sirota of joined Lemon and the other two pro-homosexual marriage advocates in pouncing on radio host Ben Ferguson who opposes homosexual marriage.  “You just said you oppose gay marriage.  You opposed extending the same rights to marriage as everybody else.  That is intolerant.  That is the definition of intolerance.”

Opposing homosexual marriage is only intolerant if homosexual marriage is morally acceptable.  Opponents of homosexual marriage oppose it for everybody not just for homosexuals, the same way they oppose adultery, sex with children, and polygamy ‘for everybody’.

David Sirota says:  “…You opposed extending the same rights to marriage as everybody else.  That is intolerant…”  Well…your right only about one thing David, I will not, nor does God tolerate this perversion of his creation.  But if what you are trying to say’ is that your rights have been violated, you would be wrong, try reading the Constitution.  As for so-called equal rights under 14th Amendment Section 1, equal protection of law clause.  Under the law Homosexuals are no different than any other citizen.  Homosexuals have equal protection of law, the same as heterosexuals.  But here is the rub David.  Homosexuals don’t want the same or equal law; they already have that, as specified under the Constitution as well as DOMA.  They want a special law/right not afforded to any other group except those that choose to live a life of perversion.  While they choose to be different and unequal they what to be treated as equal.   

In addition the U.S. Constitution does not allow special laws/rights for separate or special groups of people.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  The reason there has been a difference in opinion about homosexual marriage is because most Americans have never been taught to think.  No!  I really mean that, there is no thinking going on here.  They can’t follow an argument because they only know what they have been indoctrinated or robotically programmed with by homosexuals or proponents of this perversion.  And if you still don’t get it, then I suggest that you start reading this article all over again from the beginning until you do. 

Thanks for listing – de Andréa

No comments: