Traditional Segregationists
Traditional Marriage is a union between a man and a
woman, at the most intimate and basic levels.
By de Andréa
March 24, 2013
Marriage is not traditional because a group of people decided to make it
so. It’s traditional because God made it
so. He made men and women biologically
suitable, that is what makes it so. The
two became “one flesh” (Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:5; Mark 10:7–8; 1 Cor. 6:16; Eph.
5:31). Is the U.S. Supreme Court going
to try to overrule God and everything that is natural?
And’ beyond that my friend, it is the only way to procreate and insure
the future of the species. If we left
the world up to homosexuality, humanity would obviously become extinct.
Just because people do something the same way over and over for a long
period of time does not make something fundamentally and morally traditional. I mean people steal, rape, and murder, but no
one would call these actions morally and fundamentally traditional. If marriage is not a God-ordained
institution, then all this talk about marriage is useless, no matter who does what.
And of course, if we go down this road, then there’s nothing that has
any principled foundation in law. The
State could determine that products of conception between two biological carbon
units are the property of the State. If
the State can determine that property is ultimately owned by the State, then who’s
to say that children can’t be put in the same category? Well…that shows you how far down the wrong
road we’ve traveled, the State has already tried that…
What I am trying to say is the State does not define marriage. That’s already been done. The creator of nature and science has already
done that.
At a time in our culture when religion is out and anything but religion
is in, I’m not sure why homosexuals are pushing for a Christian recognized marriage
since it’s a relationship rooted in God.
The same God that describes homosexuality as a perversion also defines
marriage as being between one man and one woman as well as the Federal law
DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, (DOMA).
Any young person who has an elementary understanding of biology knows
that the sex organs are not compatible between men and men and women and women. They just don’t fit my friend. I wish some opponent of homosexuality would explain
this elementary bit of natural science to them and just state the obvious. I mean, come on! This is basic birds and bees stuff.
I would also like someone to point out that during the AIDS crisis that
the disease was predominately in the homosexual community. Yes I know, there were also innocent victims
of AIDS. I had a cousin who was
transfused with tainted blood and died of aids before her 10th
birthday. There are exceptions that
prove the rule.
Then there are the general mortality rates of homosexual and bi-sexual
men when compared to the general population.
“In the U.S. , recent
research has identified HIV/AIDS as the leading cause of death among men aged
25–44 in several states including New York , New Jersey , California , Florida , and Massachusetts .
It’s no wonder, therefore, that proponents of homosexual marriage are
going off the logical rails in order to defend the indefensible. The latest charge is that anti-homosexual
marriage advocates are like “racial segregationists”.
Openly homosexual Don Lemon of CNN compared opponents of
same-sex marriage with opponents of interracial marriage, he said: “People felt the same way about interracial
marriage as some people today feel about homosexual marriage. People didn’t
agree with interracial marriage. People
didn’t think black people should vote. People
didn’t think women should vote. Did that
make it right? Should you respect that
viewpoint?”
First Mr. Lemon I would like to point out that you are shockingly
ignorant. That being said, there is’ a
difference between race, gender and what people do sexually. Homosexuals cannot produce offspring unless
they find someone from the ‘opposite sex’ to supply the needed sperm or egg. It’s not a matter of race or gender or’ what
a person is by nature, but what people of all races and both genders do
sexually. Sexual distinctions are not
made in terms of race when it comes to adultery, pedophilia, polygamy, rape,
child molestation, and mother-daughter, mother-son, father-son, father-daughter
marriages that are a logical extension of the way homosexual marriage advocates
argue for their view. I hope that clears it up just a bit for you Don!
David Sirota of Salon.com joined Lemon and the other two pro-homosexual
marriage advocates in pouncing on radio host Ben Ferguson who opposes
homosexual marriage. “You
just said you oppose gay marriage. You
opposed extending the same rights to marriage as everybody else. That is intolerant. That is the definition of intolerance.”
Opposing homosexual marriage is only intolerant if homosexual marriage
is morally acceptable. Opponents of
homosexual marriage oppose it for everybody not just for homosexuals, the same way
they oppose adultery, sex with children, and polygamy ‘for everybody’.
David Sirota says: “…You
opposed extending the same rights to marriage as everybody else. That is intolerant…” Well…your right only about one thing David, I
will not, nor does God tolerate this perversion of his creation. But if what you are trying to say’ is that
your rights have been violated, you would be wrong, try reading the
Constitution. As for so-called equal
rights under 14th Amendment Section 1, equal protection of law clause.
Under the law Homosexuals are no
different than any other citizen.
Homosexuals have equal protection of law, the same as
heterosexuals. But here is the rub David. Homosexuals don’t want the same or equal law;
they already have that, as specified under the Constitution as well as
DOMA. They want a special law/right not
afforded to any other group except those that choose to live a life of
perversion. While they choose to be different
and unequal they what to be treated as equal.
In addition the U.S. Constitution does not allow special laws/rights for
separate or special groups of people.
THE BOTTOM LINE: The
reason there has been a difference in opinion about homosexual marriage is
because most Americans have never been taught to think. No! I really
mean that, there is no thinking going on here.
They can’t follow an argument because they only know what they have been
indoctrinated or robotically programmed with by homosexuals or proponents of this
perversion. And if you still don’t get
it, then I suggest that you start reading this article all over again from the
beginning until you do.
Thanks for listing – de Andréa
No comments:
Post a Comment