Time For All Americans to
Home School
By de Andréa
January 19, 2015
Autumn Leva, director of policy and communications at the Minnesota
Family Council said state high-school athletic associations are under pressure
to conform from the National Federation of State High School Associations,
or NFHS, which is heavily influenced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education
Network, or GLSEN.
She points to guidance language from the NFHS that quotes GLSEN as
proof that individual state groups like the MSHSL are being forced to fall in line.
This obviously isn’t going away folks, this is just the beginning, and
from here it will only get worse.
Earlier I published an article titled “Boys
And Girls Shower Together in American Schools”, Identifying Minnesota
public schools coming under these new rules.
Minnesota isn’t only state to adopt this outrages practice. So far 33
out of 50 states have passed and adopted similar practices.
But now it’s official. Come August of this year, high-school students in
Minnesota and many other states will be permitted to play sports on teams with
whatever gender they want, rather than what their biological gender would
dictate, a leading Christian family group believes this is a recipe for
disaster.
On Thursday, the Minnesota State High School League, or MSHSL,
officially adopted new policies that would require all public, private and most Christian
high schools if they play sports with public high schools in the league, to
accommodate transgender students, effective Aug. 1, 2015. The decision came in
the face of fierce opposition that delayed the decision by months.
“They passed a policy that will allow students who identify as transgender
into bathrooms, even hotel rooms of the opposite
biological sex. This is very problematic for many students, parents and even
schools around the state,” said Autumn Leva, director of policy and communications at the
Minnesota Family Council.
The Minnesota Family Council is one of the leading public voices against
this change in policy by the MSHSL. Officials say there will be criteria to
determine which students can qualify to play for teams of different biological
genders. Leva and her allies offered one of their own prior to Thursday’s vote.
“We brought forward our alternative proposal that is in place in three
other states,” she said. “It
would simply clarify that for the purpose of high-school athletics, a student’s
sex is their birth sex and that they play on teams that match their birth sex,
with the exception that already exists in state law that allows girls to try
out for boys’ teams (such as football or wrestling). Even though this is a
valid and completely legal policy that’s in place in other states, the High
School League gave no attention to that proposal.”
She said the clear public opinion on the matter didn’t sway the league,
either.
“Even though we brought forward a petition with close to 7,000
Minnesotans who prefer our’ solution to what the league is doing. Even public
and private schools have signed on, saying this is what they wanted and the
league didn’t even give it any air time. So it’s really been a pretty one-sided
discussion,” Leva
said.
Minnesota is the 33rd state to grant some sort of high-school sports
accommodation to transgender students. Some states like California have
transsexual policies as early as grade school. Leva said this wave happened
very recently, so it’s too soon to chronicle the impact of the
policies from around the country. She contends this is a major focal point of the gay rights
agenda. Leva said
state high-school athletic associations are under pressure to conform from
the National Federation of State High School Associations, or NFHS, which
is heavily influenced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, or
GLSEN.
She points to guidance language from the NFHS that quotes GLSEN as
proof that individual state groups like the MSHSL are being forced to fall in
line.
A bulletin from NFHS entitled, “Developing Policies for Transgender
Students on High School Teams,” and dated Nov. 21, 2014,
reads: “Transgender students are those whose gender they were assigned at
birth does not match how they identify their gender. A student might have been
identified as a boy at birth, but now identifies as a girl, or vice versa.
Transgender students often report experiencing harassment and bullying from
their classmates, as well as inaction from their teachers or coaches when they
report being taunted or physically assaulted (GLSEN, 2011).”
The MSHSL did adopt an exemption for religiously affiliated high
schools, but Leva said that provides far less protection for those schools than
the league would have Minnesotans believe.
“The league actually narrowed the exemption, so now if a private
Christian school is not directly affiliated with a particular denomination or a
specific church, they are not protected under this policy,” she said. “So they
will have to comply. That’s all of our independent Christian schools.”
Even the schools that make that cut, Leva said, could very easily feel
the consequences of noncompliance.
“If a private religious school claims their exemption will they
lose some standing in the league? Will they be forced to forfeit certain games?
Will they be forced to allow visiting schools on their facilities to allow
their students to use facilities of the opposite sex?” The answer is yes, any private school
that is in the same sports league as a public school is required to
comply. “None of those effects of the
exemption were totally clarified,” she said.
Leva said the practical effects of this policy are both obvious and
subtle.
“Again, that will almost certainly lead to (transgender athletes) using
the locker rooms of the opposite sex,” she said. “So we’ve got students’ privacy right implicated, putting students of
opposite sex in very private settings, changing and using the restroom
together. Obviously that’s a huge concern to students and parents.”
Leva added, “We’ve got Title IX implications and discrimination against female
athletes, since our state statutes make very clear that we separate female
teams for a reason, to ensure that they have an equal and fair opportunity to
compete. This policy really flies in the face of that provision.”
“So what this new policy will do is say that actually doesn’t matter and
that biological boys can now play on girls teams so long as they say that they
identify as a girl.”
But what about the precedent that already exists allowing girls to play
on boys’ teams in sports like football and wrestling? Is that evidence this is
not as big of a deal as Leva and others fear? Leva said the two situations are
not comparable.
“It goes beyond just having a girl complete as a girl on the wrestling
team or the football team, since there’s not a girls’ football team,” she said. “It goes into saying, ‘This girl
is actually a boy and is competing as a boy on the football and wrestling team
and should therefore have access to the boys’ locker rooms, the boys’ hotel
rooms on away games. The implications of this are very real and very serious.”
With the debate over policy over for the moment, Leva said it’s now
families and school leaders who have to make tough decisions.
“It rests in the hands of parents, student athletes and schools to
decide what they’re going to do,” she said. “The High School League is a
volunteer association, though schools need to be a part of it in order to
compete in state athletics. But they have a choice here to whether they’re
going to comply with this policy. The league has made it mandatory, but the
schools ultimately have a choice. Parents and student athletes also have a
choice.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: Yes… They have the choice to remove
their students from those schools and if enough parents did that it would shut
them down altogether.
When are parents
going to stand up and fight this attack on moral values?
"But you must remember, my
fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty,
and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It
behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the
Federal Government." -- Andrew
Jackson, Farewell Address, March 4, 1837
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your
email list. It may be the only chance
for them to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by
Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in
whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment