Who Is Loretta Lynch?
Moreover, is she pro-Muslim?
By de Andréa
January 30, 2015
January 30, 2015
The question in the
title might be one for the new Senate to consider in their confirmation hearings of Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Loretta
Lynch, which has already begun. Maybe that is
because Chuck Schumer has already declared that Lynch “is a
consummate professional, [who] has a
first-rate legal mind and is committed in her bones to the equal application of
justice for all people.
So what is the real
truth and what is Lynch’s position on Islamic jihad and its religious
underpinnings? In the 2012 terror plot to bomb New York’s JFK
Airport, Lynch, as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District, weighed in on the
sentencing of 66-year-old co-conspirator Kareem Ibrahim, who was
given a life sentence. According to the Associated Press (via the Seattle Times.
Lynch said in a
statement that “Ibrahim, a Shiite imam from Trinidad, “abandoned the true
tenants of his religion’ by participating in the plot.” In 2007 Lynch was already making excuses and
covering up what Kareem Ibrahim attempted
to do at Kennedy Airport in NY. Worse
than that she lied as Obama lied when he said “ISIL
is not Islamic” covering up the true agenda of
Islam. And why is Obama and members of
his regime the
only ones to identify the IS as ISIL?
Because he is a Muslim and hates Jews, the reference to ISIL supports
that.
As Robert Spencer (An
expert on the history and ideology of Islam) grimly quips at Jihad Watch:
“Yes, I am sure that
Loretta Lynch knows so much more about the true “tenants” of Islam than does a
66-year-old Shi’ite imam.”
Lynch’s defense of
Islam’s true nature are compatible with those of the president and members of
his regime, who have said variously:
·
·
” Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL
is not “Islamic.” No
religion condones the killing of innocents… Said Barack Obama
Uh-oh, he’s going to blame ISIL
on the Jews and Christians!
·
·
“ISIL does not represent Islam and Islam does not condone or honor such depravity.” Said Secretary of State John Kerry.
Lynch seems to be a
perfect fit with your Muslim President Barack
Hussein Obama— which makes her a less than perfect fit for the
role of the nation’s top cop.
Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch belonged to a student group that
brought Jew-hating Palestinian terrorists to Harvard Law School every year she
was a member. Lynch belonged to the
Harvard Black Law Students Association (BLSA) from 1981-1984 when she was a
student.
During those years the radical black group
brought representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO).
The group’s leader, Mohammed Kenyatta,
called for the “liberation of Palestine” and expressed support for the
terrorist organization. The BLSA
defended bringing the terrorists in a
letter to the editor of the Harvard student newspaper, The Harvard
Crimson.
Jewish student organizations protested the
speeches, especially in 1984. Liberal professor Alan Dershowitz joined the
anti-PLO protests. The Harvard Crimson
condemned the
response of Lynch’s organization in 1984.
The Black Law Students
Association (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory
violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an
opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).
More than 30 Jewish Law Students Association
(JLSA) members attended the panel discussion, outnumbering members of BALSA and
the Third World Coalition, the event’s sponsors. But after opening the forum to
questions from the floor, BALSA moderator Muhammad I. Kenyatta refused to
recognize any of the white hands raised in the audience. BALSA and TWC members
were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student
who hadn’t raised his hand.
We defend the PLO’s right to appear in an
open forum at Harvard. All groups have a right to present their views; had
Kenyatta permitted all students to challenge the speaker with critical
questions, the ensuing discussion might have provided a constructive exchange
of ideas and opinions.
By stifling debate, however, Kenyatta
reduced the event to little more than a propaganda platform for a terrorist
organization that has pledged to destroy the State of Israel. His refusal to
open the floor to all students’ views showed a glaring disregard for the
principles of free discussion that are vital to an enlightened academic
community.
Related Articles
Will we jump from the frying-pan into the fire with this
one?
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your
email list. It may be the only chance
for them to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by
Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in
whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment