The Federal
Dark State Persecution Of American Patriot Constitutionalists
The Bundy
ranch ‘retrial’.
By de Andréa
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’
Posted May 22, 2017
The Illegal BLM plans to use participation in Idaho’s III%
Militia and Oath Keepers as evidence of a conspiracy in Bundy Ranch Retrial.
The BLM’s Federal Dark
State attorneys and anti-American,
anti-Constitutional, Communist U.S. Federal Judge Gloria Navarro demonstrate that they have no shame in what they do
in their relentless pursuit of patriotic men wrongly charged with multiple
accounts from the Bundy Ranch siege 2014.
In the latest move by the persecution/prosecution, they
are seeking to use participation in their stand
at Sugar Pine Mine in April 2015, the White Hope Mine in
August 2015 and their legal membership in the Idaho III% militia against them
in a retrial set for this summer.
Before I go any further with this federal government atrocity
of illegal overreach and judicial tyranny, let me explain the law governing
this issue:
First: and foremost the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
as are most of the Federal Government departments, is in fact unconstitutional
and consequently its existence is against the law and therefor has no standing
to even bring charges. I challenge anyone and everyone to prove me wrong and find in
the U.S. Constitution anything that allows the BLM to exist and the Federal government
to indiscriminately own and confiscate land from the many states.
Second: also what should be understood here is that
there was merely a seeking to enforce the laws of the land, as our Constitution
does not give privilege to the
Third: If federal officers are violating the
Constitution, is it not the job of American citizens, specifically those in the
militia to "execute the Laws of the Union" per the Constitution? I realize that Congress did not call them up
as required, but we should all realize that Congress has been complicit in
these illegal land grabs as well as the establishment of these unconstitutional
illegal agencies. Congress is in
contempt of the Constitution.
And Fourth:
Listed in Article 2 of the US
Constitution are the enumerated
powers of Congress. Among those powers is the authority to
call up the militia, something they don't seem to want to do any more today, in
a similar manner to using letters of marque and reprisal, which were used
during the Barbary Wars. Instead, they want to maintain a standing army, which
has to be renewed every two years again per the Constitution which hasn’t been
done either, and is something our founding fathers warned us about. This by the
way, is why a government controlled education system is also illegal and
unconstitutional. They simply refuse to
teach the Constitution in the Public schools.
As a matter of fact the more I think about it the entire
Federal Government is Unconstitutional. Well…most of it!
So, in April, the jury found Greg Burleson and Todd Engel guilty on several charges against
them but was a hung jury when it came to the charges against Richard Lovelien,
Scott Drexler, Eric Parker, and Steven Stewart. While the prosecution has sought to dismiss the
remaining charges against Burleson and Engel for retrial, claiming it would
save the court and the government time, they remain unwilling to do so for the
other four men, whom they failed to make a case against so that the jury would
find them guilty. In fact, their case was so poor, that documents from the jury
indicate that they were leaning towards a verdict of "Not Guilty" on
the most serious charges of conspiracy.
In the latest move by the
prosecution, they are seeking to introduce evidence, which they claim is "of
intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, modus
operandi, and /or lack of accident."
The prosecution
claims the evidence is "inextricably intertwined with, the
conspiracy charged in the Superseding Indictment."
That's interesting since they
didn't bring this "evidence" in the first trial, but then they don’t
seem to do anything legally.
So, what evidence did they cite? According
to the filing submitted on Friday, they are going to point to some of the
defendants being involved at stands they took at Sugar Pine Mine in April 2015
and White Hope Mine in August 2015, as well as being members in the Idaho III%
militia. Which by the way isn’t illegal either.
According to the prosecution,
"The government intends to introduce evidence that, following the events
of April 12, 2014, defendants Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, and Scott Drexler
joined a militia group referring to themselves as the Idaho chapter of the
"III%." As part of their membership, they participated in two
additional "operations" (discussed further below) whereby they
threatened to use force and /or presented a show of force, on the public lands
to prevent federal officers from taking enforcement actions in those areas. Defendant
Parker also subsequently shared on social media photographs of himself
participating in the events of April 12, 2014, over which the "III%"
logo appears to be superimposed."
OK, fine. What's the problem here? These guys joined after the Bundy Ranch siege, not before it! This
should not be allowed to be evidence against them as a "conspiracy"
at Bundy Ranch. Second, the militia is
constitutional, as the Second Amendment affirms, and furthermore, the militia
is the very entity charged in the Constitution with law enforcement, not federal officers.
The Congress shall have Power To...provide
for calling
forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel
Invasions.... ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 15, the
prosecution said they would be bringing evidence in of Operation
Gold Rush" at Su gar Pine Mine.
"On or about April 2015, defendants
Eric Parker and Scott Drexler traveled to a mining site located on land
administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Josephine County,
Oregon," government prosecutors wrote. "As members of the Idaho
III% group, Parker and Drexler, along with others affiliated with the
"Oath Keepers" and "III%er" groups, conducted
armed patrols and presented as a show of force in order to prevent federal
officers from entering the property and taking any regulatory efforts with
respect to the mine."
Below are the Court Documents in case you want to read them. Otherwise scroll down to read the rest of the
article:
One thing I find interesting here about the mention of
Oath Keepers, is that the founder of Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes, was at Bundy
Ranch, but we don't see him arrested
and awaiting trial, do we? I have it on good authority that Rhodes was the one that put
out the bogus information regarding a potential drone strike at Bundy Ranch. In the past, Rhodes has seemingly deflected
guilt for the murder of a US veteran in broad daylight at the hands of the Pima
County Sheriff's Department despite
claims to want to fight against tyranny. However, there are plenty of faithful
veterans who have taken the title and joined his Oath Keepers organization and
many who will not join, but take seriously their oath, because they believe it
to be a controlled opposition organization, whether it is or not.
The
criminal activity that was going on at Sugar Pine Mine was that which was
engaged by the agents under the direction of the Department of the Interior, just like at
Bundy Ranch and just like at White Hope Mine, which is where the next bit of
evidence the prosecution claims to bring forth comes from.
"'Operation Big Sky' - On or
about August 2015, defendants Eric Parker and Scott Drexler traveled to a
mining site located on land administered by the United States Forest Service
("USFS") in the area of Lincoln, Montana," the
prosecution wrote. “They responded to the mine as part of an "operation" led by
the "Oath Keepers" and "III%ers" to prevent federal
officers from enforcing federal regulations with respect to the mining
operation through a show of force that included, among other things,
maintaining a military-style security operation at the mine site and
threatening to arrest federal officers."
THE BOTTOM LINE: I would
just like to point out the hypocrisy here in going all over the map to bring in
evidence of an alleged conspiracy, but the Court will not allow the defense to
call the government's star witness and all around thug in the case, Daniel P. Love, to the stand,
who was found guilty of misconduct by the
Inspector General and suspended from his job at the
BLM by the Department of Interior in October 2016.
The feds do not want their own
crimes, of unconstitutionality and misconduct and the Oregon murder of an innocent
citizen exposed to the public while they are hypocritically seeking to get a
guilty verdict against patriotic Americans, who just want the government to
obey the law.
This entire circus is un-American
and a mockery of our Constitutional Judicial system, and instead of being
ashamed, Judge Navarro and the prosecution do these things in broad
daylight. Of course the Communist media doesn’t
inform the American public of any of this, so they continue to get away with
this poor excuse of even a kangaroo court.
It’s because they are part of the “Dark State” bent on
turning this once free nation into an autocracy. Moreover, anyone who opposes them is put into
the gulags.
Sound familiar?
The 14th
Amendment guarantees that we are all subject to the same law…That includes the Federal
Government my friend…
Thanks
for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for freedom.
-
de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment