®™©
Obama Will Not Admit Islam Is
Responsible For Paris Terror Attacks
By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Published November 14, 2015
Obama proclaimed 'ISIS is contained' just hours before the attack on Paris
All the hallmarks of Islamic terror attacks in Paris,
France, on Friday weren’t enough to convince President Obama that it would be honest
to use the word “Islam.”
Obama briefly addressed the nation on Friday after a string of
coordinated Islamic terrorist attacks prompted French President Francois
Hollande to declare a state of emergency and shut all borders.
Authorities confirmed eight terrorists dead by early Saturday
morning: “This is a heartbreaking
situation. And obviously those of us here in the United States know what it’s
like. We’ve gone through these kinds of episodes ourselves,” Obama said. “I’m sure that in the days ahead we’ll learn
more about exactly what happened, and my teams will make sure that we are in
communication with the press to provide you accurate information. I don’t want
to speculate at this point in terms of who was responsible for this. It appears
that there may still be live activity and dangers that are taking place as we
speak. And so until we know from French officials that the situation is under
control, and we have for more information about it, I don’t want to speculate.”
A witness at one of the attack locations said a man screamed “This
is for Syria!” And hollard, “Allahu Akbar” as he opened fire on
patrons at a Paris restaurant. But…Obama said:
“I don’t want to speculate at this point in terms of who was responsible
for this.” As if Obama doesn’t understand Arabic!
“There are lots of dead people,” a witness told the
network. “It’s pretty horrific to be honest. I was at the back of the bar. I
couldn’t see anything. I heard gunshots. People dropped to the ground. We put a
table over our heads to protect us.”
Obama used Friday’s address to condemn the attempt “to
terrorize innocent civilians,” but refused to
specifically identify the attack as an Islamic Jihadi terrorist group.
Members of the Islamic
State immediately took to social media in droves to celebrate the attack.
“After the French crimes
in Mali, and the bombing of Syria and Iraq, now comes the killing. In your
homes there will be war,” tweeted another.
ABC News aired an interview where Obama downplayed the group’s
reach – just hours before the attack.
In an interview with
George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America,
Obama asserted that ISIS was not gaining strength and that “we have contained them.”
“We’ve always understood that our goal has to be militarily
constraining ISIL’s capabilities, cutting off their supply lines, cutting off
their financing,” he said.
And yet he won’t put troops on the ground or just carpet bomb
ISIS. He won’t cut off their supply lines, he supplies them, and instead of
cutting off their financing - he supports them. I.e. Iran, and the so-called
rebels which turned into ISIS, the so-called Palestinians, the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Saudis. He supports
them all.
Obama pushed back when Stephanopoulos suggested ISIS was gaining
strength.
“I don’t think they’re gaining strength,” Obama said. “From
the start, our goal has been to contain and we have contained them. They have
not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave. But you
don’t see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: “From the start, our goal has been to contain and we
have contained them.”
Well Obama! You Muslim son of
Satan! As you have planned, your container is leaking all over the world. The purpose of war is not to contain the enemy
Obama, but to eliminate the threat. But
Obama protects the enemy and supports them. He should be considered the enemy,
and given a free vacation to Club Gitmo.
Thanks for
listening – de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment