In a time of universal deceit, the truth is a
revolutionary act” – George Orwell
®™©
Global Destabilization
A tangled web of American government corruption.
By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Published April 10, 2015
If you are interested in learning about just a snippet of
the corruption that is and has been going on in Washington D.C., then this is a
must read for you my friend.
August
1990
president George H
W Bush invaded the Middle East and pushed Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. A lot
of people thought at the time that we should have gone farther and attacked
Iraq. Now the realization is, that it would
have probably been a mistake then, and it was likely a mistake for George W
Bush to do it in March of
2003.
Hindsight they say is always the best teacher. But one must make the mistake before one can
learn the lesson of hindsight. Looking
back on the Western involvement in the Middle East as well as North Africa, one
has to wonder just what exactly did we accomplish?
If destabilization can be sold as an accomplishment then we made a
good trade. In December
2003
we officially took out the Hussein regime in Iraq. We spent 50 million per kill of the Taliban,
in Afghanistan. In 2011 we took out Gadhafi in Libya. In 2011 we supported the
take down of al-Assad in Syria leading to the formation of ISIS. In 2011 we supported the over throw of Mubarak in Egypt and also supported the
terrorist group The Muslim Brotherhood.
Prior to 2002 these countries were relatively stable even though no one
liked any of the dictators.
The point is, all we have really achieved is not only to
completely destabilize the entire Middle East, but a large part of the rest of
the world as well. Moreover the
destabilization doesn’t stop at the borders of the Mediterranean and the Indian
Ocean, oh no! The entire European
theater and North America is suffering from the same clandestine puppetry.
So who and/or what is jiggling all the strings…
The previous revelation described here should be fairly obvious,
yes the Middle East is blowing up, and Eastern Europe is at a crossroad,
particularly the Ukraine. Most all of Western Europe will soon be part of the
IS. But what about North America?
This my dubious friend may not be quite so obvious. Weather it is destabilization by overthrowing
foreign regimes, or the destabilization of the economy both are part of an evil
plan to control the world. Globalism.
So what is really going on right now in the U.S.? Well for starters the Obama administration is
using your tax dollars to back a super-wealthy, left-wing charity that cuts
checks to a myriad of avowedly "progressive" causes,
including the notorious “Media Matters for America”, founded by Hillary Clinton
ally and Fox News nemesis David Brock.
This my friend is just one of many examples of how in the Obama
era, government is handing out money to nonprofits that share the ideology and
political inclinations of a president who looks back warmly on his time as a
community organizer in Chicago.
Note: community organizing is a
description of Communal socialism coined by Communist activist Saul Alinsky,
one of Obama’s heroes.
This president has done an amazing job of, as
he said “fundamentally transforming America” using the dollars of those
who did not want it to become a socialist state. So what did Obama mean when he said in his
campaign speeches that he would “fundamentally transform America?” So what is the fundamentals of America? Freedom, unalienable rights, Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness, come on you should be able to think of several
dozen American fundamentals yourself. All of which Obama has promised to Change
or destroy.
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that
Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient
causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more
disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by
abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of
abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to
reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards
for their future security.”--- Excerpt from the Declaration of
Independence Preamble.
In order for a regime like Obama’s economic Change, Change,
Change, social ideology to come to fruition, the present American capitalistic
economy that created the greatest prosperity in the world has to be
destabilized, rendered impotent and eventually destroyed.
“Barack is not a politician first and foremost,” first lady Michelle Obama said.
“He’s
a community activist exploring the viability of politics to make change.” Again community activist is code for
Communist Activist.
In this example, the charity receiving federal funding is called
Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a favorite philanthropy of Facebook CEO
Mark Zuckerberg. Based in Mountain View, California, it is already awash in
private funds. On its website, the
foundation acknowledges having $4.7 billion in assets under its management.
Zuckerberg pledged in December 2013 to give Facebook shares to the
Silicon Valley Community Foundation, shares worth $1 billion. He previously
gave $500 million worth of Facebook shares to the foundation and another $100
million to the foundation earmarked for public schools in Newark, New Jersey.
You
might want to read: Matthew Vadum’s “Subversion
Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts Are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off
American Taxpayers”
Yes Obama’s
criminal organization Acorn is still
alive and well…
It’s called blurring the lines.
The federal government has actually been funding left-wing groups
like the Silicon Valley Community Foundation for at least a half-century, ever
since the so-called “War on Poverty” was launched by President Lyndon Johnson.
But President Obama has taken this a step farther and is aggressively
using taxpayer funds in a way that blurs the line between government functions
and political activism, while at the same time stealthily fostering a steady
increase in the overall size and scope of government.
Another example of the Obama
administration’s funding and deployment of left-wing groups in governmental
functions to carry out its ideological agenda, was the IRS hiring of the avowedly progressive
Urban Institute, supported by far-left billionaire activist George Soros, to
process the Form 990s of non-profit groups.
You remember the revelations of the IRS targeting of conservative
groups that oppose Obama’s agenda were continuing to emerge like squeezing a
toothpaste tube.
Together, the two stories presented a picture of an administration
that rewards its friends, punishes its enemies and, in the process,
fundamentally changes the character of government in the direction of despotism.
Also, a State Department-financed non-profit
based in Israel was engaged in a major effort to get young Arab citizens to the
voting booths in the recent Israeli elections to defeat BB Netanyahu in an attempt
to destabilize Israel.
In its rewarding of friends, a pattern emerges of nonprofit groups
creating a program, pitching it to the White House, the White House accepting
it and then handing it over to the very nonprofit that conceived of the idea.
Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, called the Obama administration’s
pattern of behavior “yet another profound example of how extreme leftists have conspired to
use American taxpayers’ funds for their far-left destructive agenda.”
“Once again, that
means that most Americans who are privately paying to preserve and pass on
their love for our American heritage to our children are also having money
forcibly taken by the federal government to fund those who want to become
Castro-led-Cuba, Chavez-led-Venezuela or an anti-Judeo-Christian,
Stalin-led-Soviet state,” said Gohmert. “This president has done an amazing job of
‘fundamentally transforming’ America using the dollars of those who did not
want it to become a socialist state,” he said.
Despite its fabulous wealth, the
Silicon Valley Community Foundation was recently awarded $7.5 million in federal funding from the
Social Innovation Fund, which is administered by the
taxpayer-supported Corporation for National and Community Service, or CNCS.
Barack Obama taught principles of wealth
redistribution espoused by communist-activist Saul Alinsky, regarded as the
“father of community organizing.”
In 2009, President Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve
America Act, which reauthorized CNCS and its $1.1 billion budget and created
the Social Innovation Fund.
The SIF was established the year after the Democrat Party’s
campaign platform advocated the formation of a “Social Investment Fund Network”
to provide government funding for “social entrepreneurs and leading nonprofit
organizations (that) are assisting schools, lifting families out of poverty,
filling health care gaps and inspiring others to lead change in their own communities.”
The three-year, $7.5 million grant for the Silicon Valley
Community Foundation is earmarked for a local program in California called “The
Big Lift Social Innovation Fund.”
The new program, according to the foundation, “seeks to address the troubling
reality that in San Mateo County, 42 percent of third graders are not reading
at grade level.” I can’t help
that it may have something to do with Common Core and the dumbing down of
America program.
The foundation said the figure “rises to a shocking 60 percent
of Latino, African-American and Pacific Islander third graders. Education
experts agree that third-grade reading proficiency is one of the best
predictors of academic achievement in subsequent years. If a child is behind in
reading by the end of the third grade, it is likely that he/she will never
catch up.”
SVCF notes that it may qualify for an extra $9 million for a
fourth and fifth year, assuming Congress finds the program successful.
“Along with our lead partners, the County of San Mateo and the San
Mateo County Office of Education, we at SVCF are proud of the trust the federal
government has placed in us to put the county’s children on the road to
success,”
said Erica Wood, chief community impact officer for the foundation.
The Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which typically gives
grants to nonprofit organizations working in the fields of health, education
and the environment, also funds controversial causes.
And even though it is performing work for the government, the
foundation is far from ideologically neutral.
‘Building community’ through
Media Matters
Media
Matters founder David Brock
The declared purpose of the nine grants was for “building
community,” according to SVCF’s IRS filings.
It is unclear which community the Silicon Valley Community Foundation
is hoping its grants to the divisive Media Matters group will help to build.
Media Matters, according to critics, is about tearing down
conservatives, not about “building community.” The
self-described media watchdog ferrets out what it calls “conservative misinformation.”
In the process, it savagely defends figures on the political left such as
Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber and former top IRS official Lois Lerner,
who led the division responsible for obstructing the applications for non-profit
tax status of conservative groups.
Media Matters even has its critics on the
left.
The New York Times describes Media Matters as a “highly partisan
research organization” in a Nov. 1, 2008, article.
David Folkenflik of National Public Radio says Media Matters is
staffed by hairsplitters.
“They’re looking at every dangling participle, every dependent
clause, every semicolon, every quotation to see if there’s some way it unfairly
frames a cause, a party, a candidates that they may have some feelings for.”
Republican polling expert Frank Luntz calls Media Matters “one of
the most destructive organizations associated with American politics today.
“They are vicious, and they only understand one thing: attack,
attack, attack.”
Other left-wing organizations funded by the Silicon Valley
Community Foundation include: Tides Center and Tides Foundation ($2,546,888
since 2005), Planned Parenthood and affiliates ($2,007,950 since 2005), (Jimmy)
Carter Center ($1,346,500 since 2007), Center for American Progress ($1,696,000
since 2007), Center for Responsible Lending ($275,000 since 2009), ACLU
($204,075 since 2005), Center for Constitutional Rights ($106,500 since 2007),
People for the American Way Foundation ($90,000 since 2010), Clinton Global
Initiative ($59,000 since 2011), New Organizing Institute ($20,000 in 2012),
National Immigration Forum ($15,000 in 2012) and the Brady Center
to Prevent Gun Violence ($6,950 in 2012). An anti-American, anti-Constitutional
organization.
Bureaucrats decide
Federal bureaucrats get to decide which groups and proposals are
funded by the Social Innovation Fund. SIF creates a kind of artificial civil
society, one designed from above by elites. It focuses on three areas that are
hard to define with precision: “economic opportunity, youth development,
and healthy futures.”
In practice, it means that bureaucrats and grant recipients
propose more government spending and bigger government as solutions to all
problems.
It also means SIF uses taxpayer money to help groups hostile to
the interests of taxpayers. Even worse, many of these groups want to remake
society along radical left-wing socialist’s lines.
The Corporation for National and Community Service and its Social
Innovation Fund Is playing a role in President Obama’s recent proposal to allow
students of any age to receive two years of free instruction at a community
college.
Students would qualify provided that they maintain an average of
at least “C+” and go to school at least half of the time and are making “steady
progress” toward an associate’s degree.
“What I’d like to do is to see the first two years of community
college free for everybody who’s willing to work for it,” Obama said in a video posted
Jan. 8 by the White House. “It’s something we can accomplish, and it’s
something that will train our workforce so that we can compete with anybody in
the world.”
Obama’s proposal has been dubbed “America’s College Promise.” It
is unclear how the program would be paid for, of course your money. There’s no
free lunch my friend.
Cecilia Munoz, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council,
said fiscal details will be included in the president’s fiscal 2016 budget
proposal.
Munoz said Obama wants to make college “the norm in the same way high
school is the norm now.” What he
really means is that he wants to make sure the leftists socialistic
indoctrination continues.
Munoz is a veteran radical left-wing community organizer (code for
Communist). Before working in the Obama White House, she was senior vice
president for the Office of Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National
Council of La Raza, America’s largest Latino racial grievance organization
pushing to turn America into Mexico.
‘Revolutionary implications’
The federal government has been
funding radical left-wing activist groups since the War on Poverty got underway
in the 1960s. As reported in “Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts Are
Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers,”
the massive Johnson initiative gave taxpayers’
money to community groups so they could “agitate against the status quo.”
In a sense, according to its critics, America declared war
on itself and funded leftist groups to do the fighting.
The Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, the EOA, “provided
for job training, adult education, and loans to small businesses to attack the
roots of unemployment and poverty,” according to one historical source.
EOA-created programs still exist, including VISTA (Volunteers In
Service To America), now known as AmeriCorps VISTA, Job Corps and Head Start.
The EOA introduced a doctrine known as “maximum feasible participation.”
The idea was that the government-funded groups spawned by the law
were supposed to try to involve the poor in activism aimed at changing the
capitalistic society of America to the socialistic society of the future.
The idea had “revolutionary
implications because it involved a redistribution of power and wealth,”
according to the famed sociologist Lillian
B. Rubin. “The
idea of ‘maximum feasible participation’ has captured the imagination of the
urban poor, with the force of an idea whose time has come; it will not die,”
Rubin predicted in 1969.
In everyday practice, “maximum feasible participation”
meant encouraging more people to receive government benefits such as welfare,
said the late conservative political activist Howard Phillips, who during the
Nixon administration headed the Office of Economic Opportunity, a now-defunct
office created by the EOA.
“The way to fight poverty in their view was to expand government
subsidies to elements of the population,” he said in a 2010 interview.
Government spending programs gave money to local groups as
political patronage.
“What OEO did was fund some 10,000 organizations employing several
hundred thousand people who worked to radically transform the policies of the United
States without reference to either elections or congressional action,” Phillips said.
This, in turn, stimulated demand for more government spending as
taxpayer dollars became a kind of ever-increasing subsidy for big-government
activism.
Not surprisingly, Obama is committed to making the CNCS and the
Social Innovation Fund ever larger than ever.
Obamas destabilization and
subvention of America and why…
Watch a video of Author Matthew Vadum on ‘Manufactured’ Leftist Anarchy in Ferguson - March 12 2015
Watch a video of Author Matthew Vadum on ‘Manufactured’ Leftist Anarchy in Ferguson - March 12 2015
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass on this article to everyone on
your email list. It may be the only
chance for them to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line
Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language used in links to referenced
articles as source materials. Thank you – de Andréa
No comments:
Post a Comment