In a time of universal deceit, the truth is a
revolutionary act” – George Orwell
®™©
Death to Israel
So-called gay-rights activists say:
Jewish printer must print sighs reading “DEATH TO ISRAEL”
By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Published April 2, 2015, 2015
See dummies this
is what the Religious Freedom Restoration law is for…
The title to this article is the logical extension of
protests against Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. If a baker is
discriminating by refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding, then a
printer is discriminating for refusing to print a "Death to Israel"
sign.
Indiana’s
Religious Freedom Law is not anti-gay. It is not anti-Black. It is not
anti-Semitic. It is, however, pro-religion, pro-freedom and pro-American that’s
why Leftists ‘anti-everyone except themselves,’ hate it.
Homosexuals and their ignorant supporters are upset that
Indiana has passed a freedom of religion law. I’m confused. I thought the First
Amendment guaranteed that the government could not “prohibit the free exercise”
of religion. That’s what it says. It does not add “unless HOMOSEXUALS object.”
WHAT
HAS HAPPENED TO THIS COUNTRY???
Immorality, sodomy, and terrorism is in, God and
the constitution is out. Is this still
America?
The First Amendment is very comprehensive, that’s why I
can’t understand why we ever needed a national Religious Freedom Restoration
Act in the first place. But we got one, and because the Supreme Court ruled
that it did not apply to the states, (Question, if it doesn’t apply to the
states then whom or what does it apply to?) the states began to enact their own
version of the 1993 law that was signed by then President Bill Clinton.
A federal RFRA signed by President Clinton in
1993 shares language with Indiana and other states' bills, prohibiting the
govern ment from ‘substantially
burdening’ individuals' exercise of religion unless it is for a
‘compelling government interest’ and is doing so in the least restrictive
means.
Currently, 19 states have Religious Freedom Restoration
Acts (RFRAs).”
Sixteen additional states have introduced similar “legislation this year regarding
the creation of, or alteration to, a state religious freedom law.
When Barack Obama was an Illinois state senator, he voted
“for a version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. It passed the Illinois
Senate with a 56-0 vote, (Read the
transcript) and became law on July 1,
1998.” So why all the same-sex angst over Indiana’s law now?
The homosexual
movement is similar to the Muslin Jihadists. Any infraction or any attempt to
soften their version of the law will result in forceful retaliation. It’s no
wonder that words like “Gaystapo” and “Gay Mafia” are often used to describe the
gay agenda and what is taking place around the country today. Whatever you do
“Don’t go against the gaysters.”
Bakers, florists, and photographers have learned the hard
way not to go against the Gay Mafia terrorists. They didn’t refuse to serve
homosexuals. They only refused to service events that went against their religious beliefs as any rational
person would expect them to.
Should even a black business owner be forced to service a
white supremacy group like the KKK? Of course not.
If the homosexuals and their
brain-dead supporters get their way, it would not be illogical to argue that a
Jewish business must’ print “Death to Israel” signs and t-shirts.
At the moment, homosexuals who are opposing the Indiana Religious
Freedom Restoration Act and those in 19 other states would say that this is a
ridiculous analogy. No one would ever do such a thing. Of course, that’s not
the point.
Why should one group be permitted to apply his religious liberty
and deny service to an ideology or event and not another?
Everybody is protected by a state’s Religious Freedom Restoration
Act. If a homosexual bakery is asked to make a cake for an anti-same-sex
marriage conference, it should not have to make it.
If a pro-abortionist who owns a bakery is asked to make a cake for
an anti-abortion event, the pro-abortionist should not be forced to make it. Such a law protects everybody equally, something homosexuals do not want, they want special laws that
protect only Homosexuals. Doesn’t anyone
know that is unconstitutional? Laws just
for special groups are unconstitutional.
It’s “Equal Protection under the Law”, not ‘Special protection’.
What would happen for example if a Muslim printer was forced to print
t-shirts that read ‘Muhammad Was a Pedophile?’
Even though it is historically documented to be absolutely true. Well there would be instant Jihad, “I will kill you.”
“It is the Leftists that are bigots. To them, it doesn’t matter if
the rights of other people that get trampled on in the process. It only matters when
the rights of people Leftists care about get
trampled on.
The Left is so very strident against discrimination – oh, but only
gays, blacks, Hispanics, illegal immigrants, and Radical Islamists need apply
for the victocracy.
Yet they don’t care about discriminating against Christians, and
will do anything they can to align themselves against the Jews and Israel,
because Leftist philosophy is anti-freedom, anti-religion, and ultimately
anti-human.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: There
is always a parallel between immoral and evil groups such as Gays and Muslims. They all want tolerance in respect to
themselves but are totally intolerant of you. That about says it…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass on this article to everyone on
your email list. It may be the only
chance for them to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language used in links to referenced
articles as source materials. Thank you – de Andréa
No comments:
Post a Comment