de Andréa Is Going To Prison

Yes if California criminal…excuse me, liberal Democrat Linda Sanchez has her way, de Andrea and every other political writer and or blogger on the Net will be arrested for “Hate Crimes” under her bill HR1966


By de Andréa

A new proposal in Congress is threatening fines and jail time for what it calls "cyber- bullying" – communications that includes telephone calls, blogs, e-mails, and texting that could "cause substantial emotional distress."

The vague generalities that are included in H.R. 1966 by California Democrat Linda Sanchez and about a dozen co-sponsors can and will be used to shut down all freedom of expression.

At Wired.com in a report labeled “Threat Level” writer David Kravets criticized the plan to demand "up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress, instead of prison, perhaps we should say gulag," he wrote.

The plan is labeled the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, after the 13-year-old Meier, whose suicide last year reportedly was prompted by a woman who utilized the MySpace social networking site to send the teen critical messages.

The defendant in the case, Lori Drew, was accused under the “Computer Fraud and Abuse Act”. So we already have a law that condemns people who do what the Lori Drew’s of our society do. You see this new law is just a deception to make criminals of us all.

"The Sanchez's bill goes way beyond cyberbullying and comes close to making it a federal offense to even log onto the Internet or use the telephone," Kravets wrote. "The methods of communication where hostile speech is banned include e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages."

"We can't even say what we think of Sanchez's proposal either," he said. "Doing so, would clearly get us two years in solitary confinement."

Wrote a contributor to the Wired Forum page: "If passed, this legislation could be easily abused with the effect of criminalizing all criticism. You probably [couldn't] even criticize the legislation itself because it would cause Sen. Sanchez emotional distress or possibly be considered a form of intimidation."

The bill, which has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, states, "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce or any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."


THE BOTTOM LINE: So I hope that at least a couple of you will come to my trial (if they even give me one) and or come to visit me in the federal penitentiary once in a while, because my electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, and cause substantial emotional distress, and this is one writer that will not stop printing the truth no matter what law is passed or who is distressed about it, including the congress and this Muslim terrorist president. And if that distresses al-Berserk Hussein Obammah then good! Put me in jail, I’ll write on napkins, make paper airplanes out of them, and fly them out onto the streets.

The Congress ignorantly believes that they are the ones that give us our rights and so they also ignorantly believe that they can take them away. This is so telling of the ignorance of our law makers, because if this were true, our rights would be privileges instead, now wouldn’t they.

I answer to a higher authority, think about it…

Speak out now against illegal limits on your right of free speech!

de Andréa