Sunday, July 15, 2012

Obama…a Life of Lies!



Obama…a Life of Lies!
On what occasion do you lie Mr. President…

By de Andréa
July 15, 2012

Against a backdrop of irresistible holiday warmth and good cheer, came the big question from Barbara Walters during her painfully fawning interview with Barack and Michelle Obama this past Dec. 23.

“Mr. President,” Walters inquired delicately, “on what occasion do you lie?”  ---  “Usually, the only time I lie,” responded Obama, “is very personal interactions with family members, [when] you say, ‘You look great,’ and they don’t. ‘Wonderful dress …’ Uh, not so much.”

Michelle chimed in: “Things where the truth would hurt other people.”  “Right,” echoed Obama, “the things where truth would hurt other people.  Not too many big things.  I said during the campaign that I’ll always tell you what I think, and I will, always tell you where I stand.  I’m not perfect, but you’ll know what I believe.”

There you have it, folks.  Welcome to The Matrix – where the elite media specializes in creating virtual reality scenes like this one, which are so pleasant and seem so real … except for one small problem, they bear no resemblance to reality.

For there, seated in the midst of this elegant, Norman Rockwellesque Christmas setting, was Barack Obama, the perpetually charming and discontented radical, taking a break from his relentless campaign to “fundamentally transform America,” code words that mean destroy the American way of free enterprise and a free people.  

Barack Obama, the man who lies as easily as he breaths – a serial deceiver regarding his birth, his childhood, his education, his influences and associations, his religion, his accomplishments, his policies, his true beliefs and his plans for America’s future.  Barack Obama, the man whose entire presidency has been a seamless fabric of deception and duplicity, tells ‘Barbara Walters’ and the American people that the only time he lies is to protect a family member from hurt feelings by occasionally offering reassurance that an unflattering dress is “wonderful.”  Wow.  And he seems to get away with it; what’s more, people believe this dribble.

This level of ongoing media dishonesty in covering Barack Obama is, of course, surreal.  But let’s focus our attention on the man who is, in all likelihood, the most perfectly dishonest person ever to walk the earth, well… at least to occupy the Oval Office.

After all, the correct answer to Walters’ question is obvious.  When does Obama lie?  Every single time he speaks.

Indeed, as another long-time ABC News personality, Pulitzer prize-winning columnist George Will, pointed out recently in the Washington Post: “Barack Obama’s intellectual sociopathy – his often breezy and sometimes loutish indifference to truth – should no longer startle.”

“Sociopathy” is a strong word, but it is used by many to describe Obama – not necessarily as a clinical psychiatric diagnosis, but just because the symptoms fit so darn well, as per this typical description: “Sociopaths are often well-liked because of their charm and high charisma, but they do not usually care about other people.  They think mainly of themselves and their objectives and often blame others for the things that they do.  They have a complete disregard for rules and lie constantly.  They seldom feel guilt or learn from punishments.”  Remind you of Obama…?  It should!  It should also remind you of a typical Muslim, if it doesn’t then you don’t know Islam.

A vital, creative power
One veteran psychiatrist I know suggested a slightly different diagnosis for Obama, but similar to “sociopathy” in many ways – namely, “malignant narcissistic personality disorder.  The modifier “malignant” signifies the version of “narcissistic personality disorder” that may cross over into criminality”, he explained.  I can certainly see that characteristic in Obama.

He even reviewed a list of some of the major symptoms of NPD, comparing them with Obama’s behavior as president.  Among the key markers: “A grandiose view of one’s achievements [everything with Obama is “historic].  And an utter inability to handle criticism [everyone criticizing Obama or his policies is attacked as extremist or racist, even condemning Fox News as “not a real news organization”] and a lack of genuine empathy.”  Obama gave a televised speech on the day of the Fort Hood terror attack in which a Muslim U.S. Army major shot 45 Americans, 13 fatally.  With the entire nation reeling’ in shock and yearning for strong, reassuring words from their commander in chief, Obama instead engaged in small talk and an inane “shout-out” for two full minutes before even mentioning that the worst terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11 had just occurred hours earlier.

To be sure, many mainstream analysts, including Pulitzer-winning columnist and former psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer, have repeatedly pointed to Obama’s extreme narcissism.  Regardless of the “diagnosis,” one thing is certain:  “We’re talking about a person who absolutely does not consider serial lying to be in any way immoral or problematic”.

Far from it, for a super-ambitious and vainglorious person such as Obama, lying is a vital and creative power.  Lies for example open doors that would otherwise remain shut.  Thus in a very real sense, for Obama, lies are magic words, the invocation of which represents the exercise of real power – power to impress voters, raise money, demonize critics, win elections, pass legislation and transform a nation.  Ordinary people don’t possess this power, as they are constrained from such brazen lying by their conscience and/or the fear of being caught.  But a highly narcissistic person like Obama feels he has the freedom – indeed, the mandate – to reshape America by creatively speaking into existence his preferred version of reality, without regard for any higher standard of truth. In other words, to lie.

Here’s how psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, M.D., explains it in his classic best-seller, “People of the Lie”:  “Malignant narcissism is characterized by an unsubmitted will.  All adults who are mentally healthy submit themselves one way or another to something higher than themselves, be it God, truth, love, or some other ideal.  They do what God wants them to do rather than what they would desire.  “Thy will, not mine, be done,” the God-submitted person says.  They believe in what is true rather than what they would like to be true.

“To a greater or lesser degree, all mentally healthy individuals submit themselves to the demands of their own conscience”.  Not so the evil, however.  In the conflict between their guilt and their will, it is the guilt that must go and the will that must win.  The reader will be struck by the extraordinary willfulness of evil people.  They are men and women of obviously strong will, determined to have their own way.  There is a remarkable power in the manner in which they attempt to control others.

As we will now see, Obama has been prepared to “control others” for a long time.

I serve as a blank screen
In his second autobiography “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama makes an audacious admission: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”  While it’s amazing that anyone could openly brag about such a manipulative life-strategy, Obama has long cultivated his appealing yet ambiguous public persona in preparation for a career as a “Political Messiah”. 

For instance, he voted “present” no less than 129 times while serving as a member of the Illinois state Senate to avoid taking a position that might alienate one side or the other – including on bills he had supported and even sponsored!  Taking a position, you see, might have compromised the purity and universality of his self-perpetuated “blank screen,” which would one day serve to reflect the aspirations for “hope and change” of millions of Americans.

Appearing as “all things to all people” has been key to Obama’s meteoric rise, requiring constant deception.  As one blogger put it recently:  “He is Muslim, he is Christian, he is a capitalist, he is a socialist, he is black, he is white, he is a constitutional professor, he is an average collegian who smoked dope and did cocaine, he is a foreigner, he is American-born, he is EVERYMAN TO EVERYMAN.”

With America now in precipitous decline on his watch, many have tried to explain the enigma of Obama and his prodigious ability to lie so confidently, comfortably and continually.

Some cite Obama’s childhood, which was awful, and others cite his early influences, which were more awful.  A Berkeley, Calif., psychotherapist who writes under the pseudonym Robin of Berkeley weighs in this way:    “My gut tells me that Obama was seriously traumatized in childhood.  His mother disregarded his basic needs, dragged him all over the place, and ultimately abandoned him.”

Some cite Obama’s religious background, his muslim upbringing – his 20-year affiliation with his “spiritual mentor,” the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who is a Black Muslim who preaches raw hatred of America, capitalism and white people, and whose “black liberation theology gospel” amounted to Afro-centric Marxism dressed up with Bible verses. 

Some cite his background in “Chicago politics” – a euphemism for wall-to-wall corruption and criminality.  Indeed, the state of Illinois, where a staggering total of four recent governors – Otto Kerner, Dan Walker, George Ryan and Rod Blagojevich – have gone to prison for corruption, remains a political cesspool to this day, as confirmed by a recent study from the University of Illinois at Chicago’s political science department.  Obama is a product of this legendarily corrupt Chicago machine and played the game ruthlessly while rising in the ranks there”.

Some cite Obama’s education, the most important part of which, by his own admission, came via Saul Alinsky a well known Communist party leader.  During the 2008 campaign, Obama said of his years steeped in the Chicago Marxist’s revolutionary “community organizing” [code for Social Marxism] methods: “It was that education that was seared into my brain.  It was the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School.”

In “Rules for Radicals,” Alinsky counsels wannabe revolutionaries that “they must be willing to ignore the dictates of their own conscience to advance the left’s social communist agenda.  In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind.  The choice must always be for the latter.  Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual’s personal salvation.  He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of “personal salvation”; he doesn’t care enough for people to be corrupted for them.”

That, my friends, is one of the most foul and twisted things I’ve ever read.  To believe it and act on it is to abandon your greatest gift, your moment-to-moment connection with the Living God – your conscience.  Maybe that’s why Alinsky dedicated “Rules for Radicals” to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:  After sifting through all the psychoanalysis by all the academic psychobrains in the country, one blazing fact still remains.  Obama is a Muslim, and Muslims lie because their god Allah/Satan is the fundamental creator of all lies and deception.  Complicating this picture of psychobabble and suggesting even more questions, is the well-documented fact that during his youth in IndonesiaObama was raised and schooled as a Muslim.

In the final analysis, Obama lies because he is Muslim and that’s how he fulfills his Muslim program.  And fulfilling his robotic programming of world domination, no matter what the cost, is all he cares about, and it is all his brainwashed tunnel vision allows.

You might want to think seriously about this come November…

de Andréa 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Racist Right Play Hoiler Than Thou....again... PART 1


Oh, poor Mitt Romney! All those questions about his background. All those personal questions. Give poor Mitt a break and lay off of him. Poor guy. Let's all move to lying and criticizing and asking questions about Barack Obama instead.

When you ask if Mitt Romney has any assets that he is hiding in tax shelters or other things that give him a great leg-up on ordinary Americans, that is unfair!?!

When you ask if Mitt was or was not CEO of Bain [as federal documents show] during the years in confusion, don't ask poor Mitt to explain. Unfair!

When you ask Mitt for personal financial data on more than one year, that is unfair. Sure, John McCain revealed 20 years of such personal data when he ran for President, but that is no cause to question poor Mitt.

Don't be unfair and ask poor Mitt what financial holdings he has in the Cayman Islands, Switzerland, etc.

Let's see, have there ever been any unfair questions posed openly about Barack Obama? Isn't it interesting how pro-active the right-wingers were in pushing the lies, deceptions, and fairy tales about Obama? And these still go on. Examples:

Was Obama born in Indonesia?

Are the Hawaiian government's baptismal/birth records released to be believed?

How many death panels have been uncovered related to Obamacare?

What socialism has been found in Obamacare? What socialism has been found in Romneycare?

Is Obama a Chrisitan or a Moslem?

There are many-many questions that should be raised about the confusion surrounding Romney's past. What is unfair, is that the questions about Mitt's financial data can be answered very simply, if Mitt chose to do so. Why is Romney avoiding answering the simple questions? Why was he so silent when all the lies were being distributed about Obama?

When you are born into a favored position, as Romney was, it is difficult to be honest with the general public because you personally see yourself as above the common man and woman. Interesting how open was Mitt Romney's father, a politician and busnessman like his son, about personal matters and personal finances. In fact, Mitt's father, George Romney, chastised politicans for not being open and forthcoming.

Stooping to the muck of the right-wing questions, let me ask if the Romeny family came into the U.S. from Mexico legally or illegally? Was Mitt born in Mexico? May I see his birth certificate?

Again this is further proof I was right, Anyone who calls Barack Obama a fraud is, in fact, a racist, bigoted lyinh hypocrtical scumbag!

"Obama “sealing” his academic records." That is not true. They simply are private, just like Mitt Romney’s academic records.

Neither are “sealed.” Both are private. Neither has to show them.

“He deceived his publicist and would-be publisher that advanced him a whole lot of money in anticipation of a autobiography by a Kenyan born American.”

The publicity writer who wrote the blurb admitted making that mistake and said that Obama did not write it.

Anonymous said...

Racist Right Play Hoiler Than Thou....again... PART 2



It was not “ridiculously easy” to get a birth certificate in Hawaii saying “Kapiolani Hospital” on it (as Obama’s does) unless you were actually born in Kapiolani Hospital. It was not “ridiculously easy” to get a birth certificate in Hawaii that had the signature of a Kapiolani Hospital doctor on it unless you actually were born there and delivered by that doctor. Oh, and for the children who were not born in hospitals, the DOH in Hawaii at the time demanded a witness statement before issuing a birth certificate with a Hawaii place of birth on it.

Re Social Security number:

The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

Millions of people have errors in their SS numbers and millions have multiple social security numbers, which were caused mainly by data entry errors:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

You might well ask why, if there is evidence that Obama has multiple SS numbers and that one of them came from Connecticut that NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?

Because it is not illegal to have mistakes in your SS files, and lots of people do. And there is no evidence that this is other than a mistake, or a lot of mistakes. Republicans would be GLAD to hold a hearing to show that there was a crime involved with Obama’s SS number. But they KNOW that there is no evidence, and if they looked into their own files (I did to mine), they are likely to find multiple numbers in them.

We all know that evidence doesn't mean squat, right? Just ask the lunatic fringe *still* calling for Obama's "real birth certificate" years after the State of Hawaii has repeatedly claimed that according to official state records Obama was born in that state.

Do you know why we call you racists. Because that's what you are. There is NO other way to describe this type of hatred, but it is NOT is Patriotism...please. This is Racism, pure and simple!

Arpaio and Birthers in general are a disgusting group of people much along the lines of the KKK and other Conservative Hate groups.. What he spouts is not "truth" or "evidence" just fancy repackage BS of debunked lies and smearing crap!
there are only a few politicians who strike me as worthy of diagnosis. Many are extremely narcissistic. For example, people love to point to Newt Gingrich as someone who supposedly has Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and that makes a certain amount of sense, since he is given to making statements like "People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz," but for my money he's more just a bloated, self-important asshole than someone with a genuine personality disorder (I might be wrong).

For that matter, to the degree that many--most?--Republicans believe that virtually anyone suffering any misfortune has brought it on themselves (their perverse application of "personal responsibility"), lack of empathy is almost a prerequisite for membership in the GOP.

Nonetheless, only a few politicians seem demonstrably off. Sorry, GOPers, Obama ain't one of them.

The two politicians that strike me as being odd almost to the point of nuttiness (and I don't pretend to be able to diagnose exactly what is wrong with them) are Michelle Bachmann and Allen West. As for Democrats, it's possible that Clinton had something cooking there with his sexual behavior. It went beyond Monica Lewinski, you know.

Anonymous said...

Racist Right Play Hoiler Than Thou....again... PART 3



Notice that you can;t say anything good or inspirational about Mitt Romney, so you and your pathetic mongerl haters have the one strategy you have left, Character Assassination.. LIE, SMEAR, DISTORT, EXPLOIT CHILDREN, FEAR-MONGER people to vote for Romney. that is udderly low.

The point I'm trying to make is that you hypcortical racists are in NO position to be calling Barack Obama a liar of any kind, when for the last three years he has faced constant, unrelenting, mean-spirited, dishonest criticism since before he took office and every day since. His patriotism has been questioned by every member of the right wing echo chamber especially FoxNews and Rush Limbaugh, every single day he has served. He has been called a socialist, communist, Nazi, Marxist, traitor, foreign, un-American, liar, magic negro, halfrican and worse. He has suffered innumerable lies about his ideology, religion, family and even his place of birth. No other president in the history of this country has faced such unfounded open hostility and disrespect. No other president has ever been called a liar by a member of congress during a State of the Union, no other president has had to show his birth certificate...repeatedly.

he's not a racist and its disgusting if people are saying he is only because they do not like him. Calling someone racist is a serious allegation.

Anonymous said...

Is Barack Obama a urusrper?
No. There is no such word. If you meant "usurper," it is still NO. The Electoral College provided the votes necessary to elect Obama as president.

Is Barack Obama a socalist?
No. I do not know what a "socalist" is, but if you mean "socialist," it is still NO. A socialist would work toward public ownership of large portions of the economy and a reduction in the power of capital. As president, he has supported/saved private institutions, like banks, insurance companies, etc. The health plan he supported is actually an insurance plan in which the insurers are private, for-profit companies.

Is Barack Obama a Marxist?
No. See answer above.

Is Barack Obama a communist?
No. See answer above.

Is Barack Obama a dictator?
No. As much as previous presidents, he follows the Constitution regarding the powers delegated to Congress, the President, and the Courts. Bush and Obama appear to have expanded executive power, but he acknowledges the power of Congress and the Courts.

Can Barack Obama be impeached?
Yes. Any president can be impeached. There are provisions in the Constitution for doing so. It merely requires a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Is Barack Obama a Muslim?
No. He has publicly and repeatedly professed his Christian religion for years.

Are you sick and tired of hearing SCOAMF?
No. This is the first that I have heard of it.

Is Barack Obama a fraud?
No. He has tried to implement into public policy what he said he would do. That is the opposite of fraud.

Is Barack Obama a triator?
I am guessing you meant "traitor." NO. He has not aided enemies of the U.S. In fact, he has taken significant and successful actions against our enemies.

Does Barack Obama hate America?
No. His actions show that the interests of America are likely to be the source for his decisions.