The
Communist New York Times Is A Stooge For Islamic Al Jazeera
By de Andréa
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’
Posted June 29, 2017
As you read this article bear in mind that the terrorist
supporting nation of Qatar is
also a U.S. collaborator and ally. Go figure!
The Communist/ Nazi New York Times has become the new Islamic mouthpiece for Al
Jazeera, the Islamic Jihadi Qatari state-owned media outlet
which its monarchy uses to spew out its barbaric Jihad and promotion of
terrorism.
In an opinion piece written by the editorial board of
the Times, the Communist Terrorist promoting New York newspaper, objects
to attempts by six Gulf States — Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the
United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Yemen– to “muzzle … the terrorist promoting
state-funded news station of Al Jazeera.”
Over the past decades, the country of Qatar has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into the U.S.-designated terror
organization Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliate in Gaza. In March, Hamas leader Khaled Meshal
unveiled the new Hamas Charter of Jihad in the Sheraton Hotel in Doha Qatar. As
recently as February, Qatar sent $100 million to Gaza, as part of a $1-billion
package they promised the terrorist-run entity after starting its latest war
with Israel.
It is well-known that any money sent to Hamas,
ostensibly ear-marked for rebuilding the war zone, ends up being used to fund terror. And yet the U.S. Federal Dark State also sends 440
million every year to the Palestinian Hamas terrorists.
And Hamas is not the only beneficiary of Qatar’s
terror charity. The country has been called the “Club Med” of terror funding and the “most two-faced nation in the world” for its part in global terror financing.
Al Jazeera serves as the
international voice of the Qatari government. For example, the network provided
much of the impetus and support for the Muslim Brotherhood hijacking of the Arab
Spring in Egypt in 2011. During the tenure of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi
(from the Brotherhood’s political party), Al Jazeera provided the former leader
with an international platform.
Immediately following the coup that deposed Morsi
(after his gross violations of power and human rights), 22 journalists working
for Al Jazeera in Egypt resigned after being told
by their Qatari bosses to support the Muslim Brotherhood.
One former Al
Jazeera employee in Egypt, Mohammed Fahmy,
who served jail time in Egypt on terrorism charges for working for the Qatari
station, is now suing his former employers.
“The more the network coordinates and takes directions from the
government, the more it becomes a mouthpiece for Qatari intelligence,” Fahmy
said in an interview with Bloomberg.com. “There are many
channels who are biased, but this is past bias. Now Al-Jazeera is a voice for
terrorists.”
The Muslim Brotherhood which is the revived Ottoman Empire, is correctly regarded,
along with Pakistan’s Jamaat e-Islami, as the grandfather of modern Islamic terrorism. Abdullah Azzam, a Brotherhood member, was the mentor
of Osama bin Laden. Milestones, a book written by Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Sayyid Qutb, has become a foundational
textbook for the jihadi movement.
The Times laments that the campaign
against Al Jazeera is a drive against free speech in the region.
Still, in what might be regarded as a bizarre showing of journalistic
integrity, the newspaper notes not only that the network is state-funded much
like Russia’s Communist Tass news, but that, “Critical reporting on Qatar or
members of Qatar’s royal family is not tolerated [on the station].”
Besides their biased and anti-Semitic postings,
perhaps the Times missed Al Jazeera’s hosting of an on air
birthday party for Lebanese Hamas terrorist Samir Kuntar.
In 1979, Kuntar headed a group of four terrorists who
infiltrated Israel, killed a policeman, broke into an apartment, shot a man to
death and murdered his daughter by smashing her skull against a rock. Kuntar
was released in 2008 in a prisoner swap for coffins containing the remains of
two Israel soldiers killed by Hezbollah (Israel was not told ahead of time that
the soldiers were dead).
THE BOTTOM LINE: It is an unfortunate
occurrence in our politically correct country that our moral barometer must so
often be that of Hitler and his Nazi party. Yet, in this case, we must ask if,
during World War II, the Nazis had used a media arm controlled by Hitler to
broadcast their message, would The New
York Times have defended it as free speech and “providing a unique
view” on Germany? Or sadly, are we meant to infer from the Times ‘defense
of Al
Jazeera’s “journalistic standards” that those
are the same standards to which the Times adheres?
Probably!
Thanks
for listening. Now go do the right thing and fight for truth and freedom.
-
de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.