Obama Is Secretly Importing I.S. Terrorists Into America

 In a time of universal deceit, the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell

®™©

Obama Is Secretly Importing I.S. Terrorists Into America

How U.S. cities are secretly selected for Jihadi terrorist transplants.

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published April 0, 2015

How will the Nation of Islam defeat and take over America? Well my friend, let me count the ways…here is one of them.

In his ongoing effort to turn the U.S. into a third world Islamic State, Obama is importing thousands of Muslim Jihadist from the ISIS war to be strategically placed throughout the country. 

The Syrian civil war has caused 3.5 million Islamic refugees so far, with more than 350,000 being targeted by the United Nations for resettlement inside the U.S.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., has received a response to his letter demanding answers from Secretary of State John Kerry about the planned resettlement of dozens of Muslims in his state.  But the answers failed to shed much light on the secrecy that surrounds the so0called refugee program. The process by which cities and towns across the U.S. are selected to receive displaced persons from United Nations Muslim refugee camps remains largely shrouded in mystery.

As Gowdy discovered, the city of Spartanburg, South Carolina, was approved for an infusion of 60 Muslims, mostly from Syria and Africa, by its own state government headed by Republican Gov. Nikki Haley.

And if the program plays out in Spartanburg as it has in communities in Minnesota, California, Texas, Ohio, Illinois, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida and other states, then the 60 Muslim Jihadists will blossom into hundreds and eventually thousands every year. Minnesota, for example, is now receiving more than 2,000 Muslim Jihadists annually, mostly from Somalia. Texas receives more than 7,000 per year, and California more than 6,000, directly from the Middle East, without any vetting or screening whatsoever. How many of these so-called refugees are ISIS terrorists? Well reach into your pocket or purse and find a coin and ...well …you know what to do with it.  How do you like your family’s future security left up to the flip of a coin?

Here are the top 10 states for Muslim terrorist resettlement camps based on fiscal 2014 figures from the State Department website:

Texas, 7,201-California, 6,110-New York, 4,079-Michigan, 4,000,already considered by some to be a Muslim State-Florida, 3,519-Arizona, 2,963-Ohio, 2,812-Pennsylvania, 2,743-Georgia, 2,693-Illinois, 2,578.

The map at right indicates States where Muslim terrorists training camps are already established in

the U.S.

The United Nations and nine private resettlement agencies are pressuring the United States to accept at least 65,000 Muslim Jihadists from Syria by the end of President Obama’s term in office.

Of the 815 Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. so far, 749, or 92 percent, have been Muslim, according to State Department data.

Only 43 Syrians allowed into the U.S. have been Christians, even though the turmoil in Syria and Iraq has driven thousands of Christians from their homes under threat of death by ISIS.

The U.S. takes in more Muslim Jihadists than any other country, about 70,000 per year, and has absorbed 3 million since 1975. But since the early 1990s, the trend has been to accept more from Muslim terrorist countries.

Some residents of Spartanburg are upset and asking questions, not only about the security risks associated with importing Muslims from a Middle East war zone but also about the numbers of Muslims that will eventually end up in their county and how much it will cost to absorb them into schools, housing and health-care facilities.

Almost all Muslims Jihadists coming into the U.S. from war-torn countries are hand-selected by the United Nations.

The plan to send Muslims from Syria and Africa to Spartanburg first surfaced in March when a story appeared in a local newspaper.

Gowdy pressed Kerry’s State Department for more information in an April 13 letter.

Kerry’s response on May 1 indicated the process of picking Spartanburg as the country’s newest Muslim refugee camp actually began back in April 2013, when World Relief, one of nine private agencies that contract with the government to provide Muslim Jihadi importation services, was contacted by concerned local faith groups in Spartanburg. Gowdy’s own office was notified of the plans in August 2014.

Gowdy was not happy with Kerry’s response and fired off another letter May 4 to the secretary of state.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.

“To begin, it is important to clarify and correct the timeline of events for the proposal. In your response you stated there were two community meetings, one in August 2014 and one in January 2015,” Gowdy wrote to Kerry. “You also stated the proposal was submitted in July 2014 and approved in November 2014. Is this correct? If so, does this mean the resettlement agency had only one community meeting, which occurred after the proposal was submitted and before the State Department’s approval?”

At the community meetings no media was invited and the public was not notified.  As I said shrouded in secrecy.

Gowdy said he sent his initial letter to the State Department on April 13 because he could not answer questions asked of him by constituents regarding plans for refugees in Spartanburg.

“We have provided State’s response so the public can read it. But some of the answers are inadequate and fail to provide specificity on who was consulted at the city and county level, within the public school system, and law enforcement, and if they provided input,” Gowdy said in a statement.

Gowdy is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on immigration and border security, which has oversight responsibility for the refugee program.

The plan to place refugees in Spartanburg has been brewing for more than a year, long before any local residents caught wind of it.

Kerry’s letter provides a rare window into how a small group of people in the federal government, deceived local church groups, a federal contractor and a Governor’s state refugee coordinator conspire to plant “seedlings” of Muslim Jihadi Terrorists into communities across the U.S.

These refugees are seen by the White House and its network of pro-immigration and refugee partners – treasonous groups like National Council for La Raza, Welcoming America, the National Partnership for New Americans and the Chamber of Commerce – as potential “new Americans.” The Muslim Jihadists are set up with a full plate of government benefits paid for by your tax dollars, and placed on a fast track to citizenship and full voting rights.

Obama is also pushing to have the thousands of Central Americans who crossed the southern border last year afforded asylum status, which qualifies them for various welfare benefits and a direct track toward citizenship.

So while Spartanburg residents found out about the plan for their town in March and April, others in key leadership positions have known about it for more than a year. No public hearings have been held before the city council or local school board. Gowdy is still trying to find out exactly who in Spartanburg was made privy to the plans and who provided input.

“The initial interest in resettling refugees in Spartanburg emerged in April 2013 when World Relief was approached by Spartanburg County Baptist Network,” Kerry’s letter states. “The group, along with 25 other individuals and church organizations, expressed their support for a World Relief resettlement program in their city.”

Kerry said the State Department requires the national resettlement agency, in this case World Relief, to “thoroughly assess the local resettlement capacity and environment of any new proposed resettlement sites before determining whether to proceed with resettling refugees in that location.”

 “Two community meetings (August 2014 and January 2015) were convened to discuss refugee resettlement in the area,” Kerry wrote to Gowdy. “The August meeting, convened by World Relief, was attended by 54 members of the community including Josh Dix from your office, members of local churches, the Immigration Forum, and the Convention and Visitors Bureau for Spartanburg. Mr. Dix did not offer any concerns during the meeting or in follow-up afterward.”

Nazi Collaborator George Soros involved:

The National Immigration Forum, which was present at the meeting, receives funding from billionaire George Soros. It is the driving force behind the so-called “Evangelical Immigration Table,” or EIT. Breitbart called it “a front group for players on the institutional left including billionaire George Soros and the Ford Foundation.”  The Immigration Forum and EIT were involved in an advertising campaign promoting the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill in 2013.

The South Carolina state refugee coordinator, who works for Gov. Nikki Haley, gave her approval in November for the Muslim resettlement program to move forward.

Christina Jeffrey, a political science instructor at Wofford College in Spartanburg and former historian for the U.S. House of Representatives, said Kerry’s response shows the refugee program is ingrained not only in the federal bureaucracy but in state governments as well.

“It’s another grant program; it isn’t just the feds cramming this down our throats. It’s government corruption at all levels,” she said, “with a lot of money at stake flowing to these contractors.”

Seeking a moratorium on refugees

Jeffrey said she’s happy that Gowdy has taken an interest in the program, but she believes his responsibility goes beyond fact finding.

“I can do my own information gathering. I’m not looking to Trey Gowdy for that. I’m looking for him to do his job and provide oversight on whether this is a good use of taxpayers’ money,” Jeffrey said.

The so-called refugee (or terrorist import) program costs you the taxpayer about $1 billion a year, and that does not include the welfare benefits that many refugees receive. The Congressional Research Office recently put out a study that showed 74.2 percent of refugees receive food stamps.

“Rather than just gathering information on the Spartanburg resettlement, how about let’s put the whole program on hold until Congress has a chance to investigate it?” Jeffrey said.

Jeffrey and others have also voiced concerns about national security. Dozens of people from Muslim countries have come to America as refugees only to be charged with providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations, according to FBI reports. At least another 48 cases have been confirmed of Muslim immigrants leaving the U.S. to fight for ISIS in Syria and al-Shabab in Somalia.

The refugee programs have flown under the radar for more than 30 years, but controversy flared in February when a top FBI counter-terrorism official, Michael Steinbach, testified before the House Homeland Security committee and said “the U.S. has no way to vet the Syrian refugees for possible connections to ISIS and other terrorist organizations.”  (And the wolf said to goldilocks - “All the better to eat you with my dear.)  And Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, sent a letter to the White House Jan. 28 citing “serious national security concerns” about the Syrian refugee program and imploring Obama to not let it become a “back door for jihadists.”

Transforming America, into Muslim States one at a time:

Jeffrey believes Obama is using the so-called refugee program, along with its broader immigration policies, for political purposes. “Their intention is to identify, recruit, transport, whatever you have to do to get 9 million ‘new Americans’ naturalized as citizens and to the polls in November. I’ve never seen a more blatant ballot-stuffing program in my life.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:  If you haven’t yet read my series titled “The Obama Connection” then I strongly recommend that you do.  It’s a five part series of articles, rather lengthy but shorter than a book, moreover, in reading this well documented report on what is really going on in the world you will get the free education of your life. It will also support ‘this article’ of Obama importing Muslim ISIS terrorists into America under the pretext of benevolence towards refugees.  If this were true, then why are only 8 percent of them - a token amount Christians - while thousands upon thousands of these refugees are in fact Christians?  Where are the Christians going? Answer…nowhere.   Obama was right about one thing he said before his election, you didn’t listen then, maybe you will listen now...or not!  He said “This will no longer be a Christian Nation, it will be a Muslim Nation.”  Under Sharia Law! 

I continually warn you to buy your prayer rug and Hijab now’ before there is a shortage.

PS. You might want to buy a gun as well. Why? To protect you head my friend…

Read the series “The Obama Connection”

Part one

Part two

Part three

Part four

Part Five

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials. 

Are All So-Called Christian Colleges Now Islamic?

 "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest-- but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

®™©

Are All So-Called Christian Colleges Now Islamic?

If not, they soon will be…

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 26, 2015

One of my fellow US military veterans has been kicked out of a Mississippi Christian College, and labeled as a ‘threat’ after requesting a “Non-Muslim Counselor”.

This is how we thank young, brave American warriors who risked their lives fighting for our freedom. Instead of giving them some simple respect, we give our enemies that respect, as well as deference and submission.

Mississippi College is another Christian university that has been taken over by Islamic jihadists.  Located in Clinton, Mississippi, just west of the capital city of Jackson it was founded in 1826, MC is the second-oldest Baptist-affiliated College in the United States and the oldest college in Mississippi. Now it is an Islamic madrassa.

A former active-duty Marine who served two combat tours in Iraq and is diagnosed with combat-related PTSD was suspended from Mississippi College in Clinton, Mississippi after he requested to meet with a non-Muslim counselor in the school’s Office of Counseling and Disability Services.

Is it any wonder that this battle-weary student soldier would be more comfortable talking to a non-Muslim counselor? And for that he is kicked out of school, and labeled a “threat.”

Some of our so-called Christian universities have become nothing but sewers of hate and Islamic Jihadism.

May I suggest that you politely contact the President of this once Christian University, Lee Gardner Royce. Gently explain that returning vets deserve our love and respect. We don’t know what this young hero has endured, but we do know it is ghastly. Wish him a good Memorial Day. And ask why there are Muslim Counselors in a Christian University.

President’s Office  carpenter@mc.edu 601-925-3200 Box 4001 200 S Capitol St, Clinton, MS 39058  (601) 925-3000  Student Counseling Services mbryant@mc.edu 601.925.7790 4013

Campus Reform reports that a former active-duty Marine who served two combat tours in Iraq and is diagnosed with combat-related PTSD was suspended from Mississippi College in Clinton, Mississippi after he requested to meet with a non-Muslim counselor in the school’s Office of Counseling and Disability Services.

In addition to serving in the Marine Corps, Jeremy Rawls worked as a private contractor in Afghanistan and was a member of the Army National Guard for seven years. He was on active-duty in Iraq during the Second Battle of Fallujah—named the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War—and says he’s lost many friends to suicide due to PTSD.

Rawls, who is pursuing a degree in English with a minor in education, was originally paired with a female counselor in traditional Muslim dress during his initial visit. “It’s not that I didn’t want to participate,” Rawls said. “I didn’t want to traumatize her and it wasn’t a good environment to be talking about [my disabilities] with that specific person.”

Since February, the senior has struggled to maintain good grades and reclaim the work-study position he’d procured through the local VA after administrators suspended him and labeled him a threat to himself and other students. In an email notifying Rawls of his suspension, Associate Dean of Students Jonathan Ambrose said administrators and the Student Intervention Team have a due diligence in not only the protection of yourself, but also the campus community as a whole from potential harm or the threat there of. You are not permitted to be on campus for any reason or attend class during the duration of the Interim Suspension unless you have written permission.

According to Rawls, the school never spoke with “a single professor” about his grades or behavior prior to suspending and subsequently removing him from the work-study position. “To have been a marine and to tell us we’re a threat… that’s actually a compliment,” said Rawls. “But telling me I’m a threat to others was extremely offensive.”

Rawls said his attempts to meet with staff members to discuss changing counselors were repeatedly ignored until recently. “Their response was suspending me pending a mental evaluation which I provided and then they put me on further restriction and a ‘reintegration’ [brainwashing] program,” Rawls said.

Last Thursday Rawls met with administrators in an effort to begin resolving the matter and to ensure that he is able to fully participate in academics and extracurricular activities in the coming school year. “They asked me what I wanted and I told them I want to be a normal student and I want my job back,” Rawls said.

 “If they’ll do this to me, and I’m one of the most outspoken veterans on campus, they’ll definitely do this to others,” Rawls said.

The country’s “leading Muslim civil rights group,” the terrorist organization called CAIR, today questioned if US troops should even be honored on Memorial Day. They want a day to celebrate the attack on 9/11 or ISIS veterans.

CAIR indecently has infiltrated the FBI and the Pentagon as well as several other Federal security agencies, and also its murdering thugs have threatened my’ life and the lives of my family for exposing them.  And if that is not enough the FBI has threatened me with arrest for exposing them.

THE BOTTOM LINE: How and why does this happen? Well first of all it is not an isolated case. On the contrary, it is happening all over the United States every day of the week.  In public schools I can understand, because we have a terrorist Islamic president and a government whose department of education peddles the Islamic ideology of murder and mayhem. But my friend, this is happening in Colleges and universities like this one that claim to be Christian.  Let me ask you…What is Christian about this kind of behavior?

I’ll let you in on a little secret that so-called Christian colleges don’t tell you.  Follow the money my friend.  They are more and more supported by Islamic terrorist organizations. Many come out of, or through the terrorist supporting country of Qatar.  This is supposedly a very old and well established respected Baptist University that has no respect whatsoever for American Christians but instead they indorse the Muslim Satanic ideology.   Another even older so-called Catholic University, once a very well respected College in Washington DC.  Maybe you have heard of it. It’s called Georgetown U. -- made the mistake of accepting donations from Saudi Arabia. Today it is totally dependent on moneys from Islamic terrorist organizations from all over the Middle East.  And today one could not distinguish it from a Muslim Madrassa. They are incrementally removing all the crucifixes from the halls and walls and auditorium because they offend Muslims whose brothers are murdering Christians by the thousands.  Your Muslim president wouldn’t speak at Georgetown unless they covered the Crucifixes.

Christian Universities are becoming Chris’lam Universities.  And soon they will all be Islam Universities.  If you let a Muslim put his foot in your door, soon he will sleep in your bed.

Read your history my friend, it has always been the Islamic order of things.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials

Kenyan Christians Say Stop Obama

 "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest-- but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

®™©

Kenyan Christians Say Stop Obama

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 24, 2015

Obama is not only at war with Christians in America and the Middle East, he is at war with Christians everywhere.  Even in his own country of Kenya.

Hundreds of pastors in Kenya, Obama’s country of birth, have had enough of your President Barack Obama’s perverted aggressive push to promote homosexuality in African nations and forsake their religious convictions and fully embrace homosexual behavior and same-sex “marriage.”

The 700 pastors of the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, welcomes Obama to visit their nation this summer — provided he stop pushing his immoral agenda on Kenyans to forsake their religious convictions by endorsing the homosexual lifestyle.

Bishop Mark Kariuki, a megachurch pastor who advises some 700 pastors as the leader of the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, says what isn’t welcome is a repeat performance of Obama scorning believers for not ascribing to his homosexual sodomy agenda. “…as it has been his tendency whenever he comes to Africa.” Kariuki told Kenya’s Daily Nation newspaper on Monday.

Obama’s past directives to the Kenyan nation — where he and his Muslim father were born — were not only authoritative in nature, but disrespectful of Kenyans’ traditions and belief systems.

“Obama should respect the faith, culture and people of Kenya when he comes in July,” Karuiki implored. “He should not put homosexuality as one of his main agendas in the country.”

Christians aren’t the only ones in Kenya distrustful of Obama’s visit, as the Inter-Religious Council of Kenya (IRCK), along with members of the Kenyan Parliament have scheduled a protest of the president’s visit to a country that most people call his homeland.

“Showing more boldness in his foreign policy when it comes to homosexuality than to his war on terror, Obama is believed to be overstepping his authority and jurisdiction by making his aggressive LGBT agenda the centerpiece of his international campaign — especially throughout the African continent.” Said IRCK Chairman Adan Wachu.

“In June 2013, Obama provoked a clash with the president of Senegal, Mackey Sall, over the nation's rejection of the LGBT political agenda,” LifeSiteNews reports. “Standing alongside Sall just the day after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, Obama said that people should be accorded rights based on ‘sexual orientation.’”

At that time, Obama insisted that the world should adopt his’ endorsement of “LGBT rights,” declaring, “And that's a principle that I think applies universally.”

Obama may have skipped the land of his forefathers on his $100-million African vacation in 2013, when he condemned the continents’ nations for their “anti-homosexual” policies, but Kenyan leaders nonetheless rebuked the president’s statements.

“Homosexuality goes against our customs and traditions,” Kenya’s Deputy President William Ruto declared while speaking at St. Gabriel’s Catholic Church in Maili Kumi. “We believe in God … This nation, the nation of Kenya, is sovereign and God-fearing.”

A call to destruction?

Archibishop of Nairobi Cardinal John Njue called out Obama and other international leaders for their role in the destruction of nations embracing the failed social experiment of homosexuality.

“Those people who have already ruined their society … let them not become our teachers to tell us where to go,” urged Njue, who also serves as president of the Kenyan Episcopal Conference. “I think we need to act according to our own traditions and our faiths.”

LifeSiteNews’ Ben Johnson reports. “It was neither the first nor the last time that the president decided that advancing the homosexual agenda trumped indigenous African human rights issues.”

Support homosexuality … or else …

Using funding — or the retraction of it — to persuade other nations to be on board with the worldwide push to embrace homosexual behavior, Obama is doing all he can to normalize the unbiblical practice around the world.

“In 2011, Western nations denied Malawi nearly $350 million, because the nation banned homosexual activity,” Johnson continued. “Wikileaks revealed the Obama administration coordinated with homosexual activists to promote the LGBT agenda in Sierra Leone.”

While serving at that time as World Congress of Families executive director years ago, Janice Shaw Crouse said that Obama showed partiality to the LGBT, going against the religious and cultural mores that nations have embraced for millennia globally.

“Obama’s actions are a form of ‘cultural imperialism’ — exporting the sexual crusade of a very small minority of Americans with outsized influence who have tried to tear down the moral foundations of our nation, as well as the rest of the world,” Crouse told LifeSiteNews in 2011.

Moreover, it has been noted that Obama’s campaign to promote homosexuality has trumped his so-called war on terror.  “Recently, both U.S. political and African religious leaders say the Obama administration withheld aid to help Nigeria fight Boko Haram, the Islamic terrorist organization, because the nation rejects same-sex ‘marriage,’” Johnson recounted.

It is believed that, if elected, leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will follow in Obama’s footsteps when it comes to pushing the homosexual agenda both domestically and abroad. “There is a whole movement in which many people in the Obama administration are involved — Hillary Clinton at the forefront — that is pushing the ‘sexual rights’ agenda,” asserted Sharon Slater, who produced Cultural Imperialism: The Sexual Rights Agenda.

“African political leaders were being blackmailed, bribed and bullied into accepting sexual rights that run counter to their religious and cultural values.”

Corroborating Christians’ and conservatives’ fears that former secretary of state Clinton would follow up Obama’s full-fledged propagation of the homosexual agenda, she candidly proclaimed last month that faiths opposed to homosexual behavior must denounce the moral precepts undergirding their beliefs derived from their holy scriptures.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  ”...the Obama administration withheld aid to help Nigeria fight Boko Haram, the Islamic terrorist organization, because the nation rejects same-sex ‘marriage.”  Wrote LifeSiteNews.

So…According to your pervert Muslim president, fighting Islamic terror is contingent upon the promotion of the practice of LGBT.  If his Muslim Brothers heard that they would hang him upside down and set him on fire.

This poor excuse for a deviant Muslim is more perverted than his own prophet. 

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials. 

What Is A Muslim And What Does It Mean To You

 "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest-- but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

®™©

What Is A Muslim And What Does It Mean To You

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 23, 2015

If you have never read my articles or anything about Islam…or even if you have, you really need to watch these videos of a very good friend of mine who calls herself Bridget Gabriel.  As I have said so many times in the past, there are only a very few people on the earth including Muslims themselves that really understand what Islam is about, and Bridget is one of them. 

In the first video she speaks to an audience of 500 United Nation leaders at the UN in New York.  And note that she pulls no punches. She simply tells the truth that most of them have likely never heard with such authority.  

Here is the URL, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZPBCJwdA74

The second video actually follows the first, if you just stand by, or the URL is below. She speaks to Jimmy Swaggert about what America is facing regarding Islam.  The ignorance and deception that the west has fallen into.  Listen closely to what Bridget has to say how Lebanon was a parallel to America and now America is now a parallel to the mistakes that Lebanon did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku7eU6M21Ho

THE BOTTOM LINE: I hope this is informative to you.  If it is, You will know and understand more than most people in the world about the ideology and intentions of Islam in the world.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials. 

 “Although all men are born free, slavery has been the general lot of the human race.  Ignorant --they have been cheated.   Asleep -- they have been surprised.  Divided -- the yoke has been forced upon them.  But what is the lesson? …the people ought to be enlightened, to be awakened, to be united, that after establishing a government they should watch over it....It is universally admitted that a well --instructed people alone, can be permanently free.”-James Madison

®™©

Christians and the Coming Tyranny

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 21, 2015

Does the Bible teach total passiveness when it comes to tyrants?  The Jews thought so up until the year 1945, and just look at what happened to them? While the Scriptures teaches that it is proper to obey those in authority over us, it also teaches us to rebel against any unlawful order, excluding us from being total subjects of tyranny. 

And if you don't believe tyranny is coming..well it's already here watch this.

In the past I have discussed the biblical principle of Christian resistance for example as it relates to the upcoming Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage. As I pointed out there are examples in the Bible of God’s people resisting direct commands by civil officials based on a very specific set of higher law principles.

Christian apologist Francis A. Schaeffer wrote: “Let us not forget why the Christians were killed. They were not killed because they worshipped Jesus... Nobody cared who worshipped whom as long as the worshipper did not disrupt the unity of the state, centered in the formal worship of Caesar. The reason Christians were killed was because they were rebels”1 and placed the god of the Bible over the claim that the State and its Caesars were gods. The proof?: “they all act contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, Jesus” (Acts 17:7).

Contrary to what many people have been told, King James of the King James Bible wanted a translation that countered the notes in the 1559 Geneva Bible, the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims. Not just to translate the Bible into the English language. The Geneva Bible was already in English.  “For example, the margin notes for Daniel 6:22 imply that the commands of kings are to be disobeyed if they conflict with the law of God: ‘For he [Daniel] disobeyed the king’s wicked commandment in order to obey God, and so he did no injury to the king, who ought to command nothing by which God would be dishonored.’”2

Alister McGrath comments:

“Notice also how the Genevan notes  regularly use the word ‘tyrant’ to refer to kings; the King James Bible never uses this word—a fact noted with approval as much as relief by many royalists at this point.”3

It’s no wonder that King James authorized a fresh translation of the Bible to undermine the republican implications of the Geneva Bible. 4

Because of its no exception tone, Romans 13 is seen as prohibiting all resistance to the law of the State: "Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. . .” (v. 1). The apostle lists no exceptions. Peter makes a similar statement: "Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right" (1 Peter 2:13-14). Again, no exceptions. This is the same Peter who declared, "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29; cf. 4:19-20). How do we reconcile this apparent contradiction?

Jonathan Mayhew (1720-1766) states the following in his 1750 sermon “Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers”:

“Thus, upon a careful review of the apostle's reasoning in this passage, it appears that his arguments to enforce submission, are of such a nature, as to conclude only in favor of submission to such rulers as he himself describes; i.e., such as rule for the good of society, which is the only end of their institution. Common tyrants, and public oppressors, are not entitled to obedience from their subjects, by virtue of anything here laid down by the inspired apostle.”

There are a number of places in Scripture where one verse speaks in absolute terms and other verses offer exceptions. This is not unusual. If I tell my grandchildren to go outside and play until dinner is ready, I have spoken in absolute terms. They are not to come into the house until they are called. No exceptions are given. What if it rains? What if a large dog enters the yard? Can they enter the house without violating my absolute and no exception command?

They would not be violating the “no exception” command because there are unspoken exceptions. They are assumed to be operating without them having to be repeated each time a new command is given. They have been told on previous occasions to "come in when it's raining" and "do not get near stray dogs that wander into the yard.

The Bible operates in the same manner. In one place Jesus says, "All those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword" (Matt. 26:52). Does this include the civil magistrate? What about the person who strikes an assailant in self-defense? Is this not an exception to Jesus' “no exception” statement? Since the Bible already discusses self-defense (Ex. 22:2-3; Deut. 19:21) and the role of the civil magistrate (e.g., Gen. 9:6), there is no need to repeat the exceptions since Jesus’ hearers knew He has anarchy and revolution in mind (e.g., Lev. 19:18), not the just use of the sword. Romans 13:4 explains that it is the duty of the civil magistrate to use the sword in certain specified cases. Is this a contradiction? No.

So then, when we read passages like Romans 13:1 and 1 Peter 2:13-14, we must not neglect the rest of the Bible that is equally authoritative and more fully explains and qualifies these passages.

“Many general statements of Scripture must be open to admitting exceptions even those qualifications are not immediately spelled out. Why are so many generalizations stated without qualification? Because the exact conditions restricting their applicability are not known, or because the "accidental" or providential circumstances that render them inapplicable occur so seldom as to be practically negligible, or because such qualification has already been stipulated in another inscripturated context.”5

THE BOTTOM LINE: We must recognize that as the State becomes more and more despotic and non-Christian in its social and political policies, conflicts between church and State will multiply. That conflict may make it necessary for Christians to say no’ to statist laws that will force them to violate the laws of God as well as their own constitution, forcing the people to choose just which laws they are going to recognize.

There is an additional reason why Christians must understand the limits of civil jurisdiction and the limits of resistance. Because of a desire to see the current corruption in our own nation reversed, some Christians may take it upon themselves to bring about change by revolutionary means. While the Spirit of revolution is unbiblical, but as the patriots in early America had tyranny thrust upon them with only the alternative to obey or die, we must look to the exception of self-defense and self-preservation.    

How Christians go about resisting is a question that needs to be answered in exacting detail. The fact that we have lesser magistrates – state governments, governors, and state constitutions – that can serve as legitimate governing authorities as a means to rebuff civil and judicial tyranny is a viable governing avenue for Christians to take.  But what if those in authority violate their own laws???

Think about it, my    Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials. 

Obama’s Iranian Deal Will Destroy The West

 In a time of universal deceit, the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell

®™©

Obama’s Iranian Deal Will Destroy The West

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 20, 2015

“For God shall bring every work into the judgment concerning every hidden thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12:14)

Let me make one thing perfectly clear before you start reading this article.  Negotiations and or treaties with Muslims are ignorant, futile and dangerous.  Read the Muslim Hadith.  If you think otherwise, then please give me one example of a lasting treaty with any Muslim organization and/or country.  The only wise approach to Iran is to order them to unconditionally cease a nuclear endeavor of any kind. Iran’s so-called need for peacetime nuclear power is a ruse, they have sufficient cheap power in fossil fuel for an eternity. 

The Western allies should order Iran to destroy all of their centrifuges now’, or face total isolation and if they still refuse, they will be annihilated, no threat, just fact.  It is the only language that Islam understands. It is the only deal one can make with terrorists.  We do have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists, then why are we negotiating.  I will again tell you why!  Obama totally understands that what I just said is true, but you must see that Obama’s deal is not to stop Iran, OBAMA’S 

DEAL, IS TO IMPOWER IRAN AND DESTROY THE WEST!

Obama has known for years that Iran is just months away from a nuclear bomb, yet he kept it to himself until it was convenient, reported Bloomberg Tuesday.

According to the report, the Obama administration has long estimated a two- to three-month breakout time, yet only declassified this information April 1, 2015 “just in time for the White House to make the case for its Iran deal to Congress and the public”.

Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz acknowledged to the news agency that the US has known for “quite some time” that Iran is closer to a bomb than the administration has let on. He added that Iran is “right now spinning, I mean enriching with 9,400 centrifuges out of their roughly 19,000. Plus all the . . . . R&D work. If you put that together it’s very, very little time to go forward. That’s the 2-3 months” estimated for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon.

Yet all this time, Obama has insisted that Iran was not nearly that close to achieving a nuclear bomb. Back in 2013, before a visit to Israel, Obama told Israel’s Channel Two, “Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually develop a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close.”  

That same year, in an effort to downplay Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s more alarmist estimate of six months, but Obama told the Associated Press in October, “Our assessment continues to be a year or more away. And in fact, actually, our estimate is probably more conservative than the estimates of Israeli intelligence services.” I was In Israel at the time.

David Albright, a former weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security, told Eli Lake at Bloomberg that he felt the administration was being intentionally vague in 2013.

“They weren’t clear at all about what this one-year estimate meant, but people like me who said let’s break it down to the constituent pieces in terms of time to build a bomb were rebuffed,” he said. Albright and his group came up with their own estimate, measuring only the production of highly enriched uranium, concluding that Iran was a mere month away.

Read an article I published May 27, 2009, about Obama’s warning to Israel about attacking Iran.  And another on March 02, 2015 about Obama’s threat to shoot down Israeli planes if they chose to bomb Iran.   

A spokeswoman for the National Security Council downplayed Albright’s numbers to USA Today, saying the intelligence community maintains “a number of assessments” of the time Iran needs to become a nuclear threat.

Albright’s position, however, is supported by leaked International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) document, first published by the Associated Press in 2009. It concluded Iran “has sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable implosion nuclear device based upon (highly enriched uranium) as the fission fuel.”

Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst who is now an Iran expert at the Brookings Institution, told Lake that estimating breakout times is an imprecise business. “The idea there is such a thing as a hard and fast formula for this is nonsense,” he said. “All the physicists come up with different answers depending on what inputs they use.”  Bear in mind that the Brookings Institution is affiliated with and supported by the Muslim Brotherhood operating out of Doha Qatar.  This makes Obama’s manipulative use of a foreshortened timeline all the more sinister.

On April 2, Obama identified one benefit of the nuclear framework deal, saying, “even if it violated the deal, for the next decade at least, Iran would be a minimum of a year away from acquiring enough material for a bomb.”  Obama knows darn well that Iran will in fact violate any deal, he has read the Muslim Hadith and follows it to the max.

Representative Devin Nunes, the Republican chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence doesn’t buy it. “We’ve been researching [the administration’s] claim that a deal would lengthen the breakout time for Iran from two to three months to a year,” he told Lake. “We’re just trying to confirm any of their numbers and we can’t confirm or make sense of what they are referencing.”

Israel has consistently maintained that a nuclear Iran is a dire threat to the security of the entire world, and that successive US agreements with the Islamic Republic have put Israel in grave danger. Netanyahu has said on numerous occasions that “Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability,” or endanger Israeli citizens.

Allowing Iran to achieve nuclear capability is exactly the same as ISIS having a nuclear weapon.  Iran is simply using and supporting ISIS to carry out its dirty work in the Middle east, the Sinai Peninsula and in North Africa, and eventually Europe and America. 

When or if Iran builds a nuclear warhead this may spark the Biblical war of Armageddon on the Tel of Megiddo  or the valley of Jehoshaphat.

Whether one believes in a literal Armageddon or not, I don’t believe that anyone could possibly ignore the danger of Iran/ISIS with a nuclear weapon. 

THE BOTTOM LINE: One would have to be willfully and wantonly ignorant not to see the picture unfolding right in front of us.  I have claimed since Obama first ran for president, that he would do everything he could to destroy America and promote the World Nation of Islam. This is just another piece of the enormity of evidence that Obama is the enemy of Western freedom, culture and liberty.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.