Bureaucratic Leaders Suffer
From Political and Social Brain Damage
One may as well throw in delusions of grandeur…
By de Andréa
While 61 percent of
the nation is swinging toward some kind of armed security in schools, the
Communist haters of children that would just as soon kill them all, ‘before
birth’ - are trying to lead us down a path of false security and certain destruction,
all in the name of safety. Sounds
Hitleresque to me!
New York’s Mayor,
Michael Bloomberg for example lives in a fairy tale world… a place of make
believe where Communist dictators direct every aspect of citizens’ lives … from
what and how much they are allowed to
eat and/or drink, to what they can
legally own, to what they can even think.
Mayor Bloomberg
said over the weekend that President Obama should bypass Congress and by EXECUTIVE ORDER,
take [dictatorial] action on gun control or thousands of people will die. He even named a number: 48,000 people: “If
he does nothing during his second term, something like 48,000 Americans will be
killed with illegal guns.” Has
he lost his mind? The reason why
thousands of Americans are dying is because in many cases the crazies like
Bloomberg are the only ones that are armed.
Since its gun ban in 1994, the UK’s death rate do to violent gun
crime has doubled, look it up, it is now in the millions per year, all in a GUN
FREE COUNTRY! How do you think that’s
working out for them? Not to bloody good I’d say!
Why is no one
looking into Bloomberg’s mental stability?
First let’s examine some of the phrases he uses: “Bypass Congress.” “Executive Orders.” It seems to me that Bloomberg’s view of the America
Presidency is more like a Communist Dictatorship rather than an elected President
of a Republic. Of course, Bloomberg
knows the only way dictators can rule people is to take away their ability to
rise up and fight back against tyranny, he must have read Mien Kampf, that’s
how Hitler did it, incidentally, he was considered crazy too.
NY Governor Andrew
M. Cuomo said Thursday that he had started discussions with leaders of the
State Legislature about new gun control measures, and that he planned to
propose a package of gun legislation in his State of the State address on Jan.
9.
The New York
Assembly, controlled by Democrats, has voted for a number of proposed gun
control measures in recent years, only to have the legislation falter in the
Senate, which has been controlled by Republicans. (Starting next month, the Senate is to be led
by a coalition of Republicans and a breakaway faction of Democrats.) NY, second only to Illinois
in gun control laws, is ironically also second in gun murders right after Illinois who is number
one. Are these people in addition to
being mentally impaired, also deaf, dumb, and blind?
In the interview,
Mr. Cuomo did not offer specifics about the measures he might propose, but,
while discussing assault weapons, he said: “Confiscation could be an option.
Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your
gun, but permit it.”
The mere idea that
the New York
government could confiscate private, legally owned property that one does have
a constitutional right to own is bad enough.
Cuomo, however seems to think this is actually within his power to do
so…
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author
of the original federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of
1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd—
she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I
have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and
“It will be carefully focused.”
Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, she said on Dec. 21st that
she had “personally looked at PICTURES of guns
in 1993, and again in 2012.”
Oh! Well…Di-Fi looked at pictures…Twice! It is so comforting to have a brain-dead
expert in government making illegal unconstitutional laws banning guns who has
looked at pictures of guns. I have
personally looked at pictures of the human brain…at least twice, maybe a
hundred times; by Feinstein’s sick logic, that makes me a brain surgeon. I think Di-Fi would be hard pressed to decide
which end the bullet comes out of an assault rifle. I know she may at least know which end the
bullet comes out of a revolver because she carries one. Kind of hypocritical don’t you think! Incidentally
the Columbine High School shooting took place in April
of 1999, right smack dab in the middle of Di-Fi’s first “Assault Weapons
Ban”. Oh well… crazy people always want
to do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.
Di-Fi’s
new Gun
Ban that she plans to introduce on
January 3rd 2013 expands the definition of “assault
weapon” by including: Three very popular rifles: The American M1 Carbine
(introduced in 1944 and for many years it was sold by the federal government to
individuals, a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the Russian
SKS. I may shortly become a felon along
with approximately 68 percent of all Americans.
“Laws don’t prevent crime they create criminals” de Andréa
December 2012.
The new law will ban any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or
rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than
10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.
Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an
overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed
magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any
semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel. The bill goes on, and on, and on, creating a
whole new category of criminal, called a “constitutional criminal”. One who is protected by the US Constitution but
is condemned by illegal national laws. It bans every gun except the assault weapon
she has carried for nearly 20 years, a 38 revolver. But of course she needs a weapon, because her
life is worth more than your life, or the life of your children.
The new National gun ban will require owners of existing
“assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the
National Firearms Act (NFA). This is of course
so the BATF can come to your front door with or without a warrant and
confiscate your constitutionally protected arms, nearly guaranteeing the
ability of the new National Dictatorship to enact the new martial law, and if
by magic, over night, we will have instant tyranny.
The bill would also include a requirement
that all gun owners to be fingerprinted.
Well, there is much more to the story.
The handguns mentioned were pretty specific and if this bill is passed,
you can say “Goodbye” to purchasing a new Glock, Sig Sauer, Smith & Wesson,
M&P, H&K, or Colt among other name brands.
Certain other semiautomatic
rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable
magazine and have one military characteristic.
I point this out because most in the
line of the above mentioned brands fit the criteria outlined in this bill. Additionally, you’ll notice it isn’t just
assault weapons or even semi-automatic handguns Feinstein mentions. Included are shotguns with detachable
magazines that have one military characteristic. These would include pump action shotguns with
magazines, as well as, semi-automatic shotguns with magazines.
You may be thinking to yourself that
the weapons you already own that fit into these categories will be
grandfathered in. You would be correct. However, as I
pointed out grandfathering requires the
following:
It Requires
that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act,
to include:
Background
check of owner and any transferee;
Type and
serial number of the firearm;
Positive
identification, including photograph and fingerprint, you will be registered as
a militant criminal.
Certification
from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate
State or local laws;
Also there is an additional tax for you
to pay when you register those weapons under the National Firearms Act that you
already own! According to the
NRA’s
Institute for Legislative Action, “The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm.” So,
they are going to
charge you a couple of hundred bucks more for every weapon you already own that
falls into these categories!
So while we’ve been hearing lots about
the AR-15, an excellent and accurate rifle, and the snooty remarks about how “no one needs a 30 round magazine,” no one
needs’ a Lamborghini either, so are we going to outlaw everything the
brain-dead legislators decide we don’t need. The sneakiness of the Democrats on the new
bill doesn’t disappoint us as Senator Feinstein has gone way beyond any of that. The focus of late has been on the military
style rifles, in the wake of the shootings recently, including the one that
took place in Newtown, Connecticut.
Semi-automatic handguns have had some degree of light cast upon them as
well, but the call for banning is not just about these weapons and it isn’t
just about children murdered at Sandy Hook.
It’s the old adage of the “camel getting its nose in the tent.”
This is just a way for brain-damaged Democrats
and anti American gun grabbers to get their foot in your door, on their way to
attempt to ban and confiscate all guns. Right
now they claim to want to do it only prospectively, but should this pass and
more shootings occur, there will be a push to do it retroactively. You should wonder how they would enforce it. If you still have the ability to think for
yourself you will know that Martial Law will easily take care or that.
Should it come to that, I believe there
are many Americans who will give their guns to the government. In fact, many are doing so now for next to
nothing gift cards. Other Americans however,
in the spirit of the founding fathers, will give the feds their guns….bullets first,
of course.
But what will be next? Now it’s military style rifles, semi-automatic
handguns, and shotguns. How long before
revolvers are included? What about Derringers? How long before even a simple .22 rifle or
handgun, or even a BB gun will be pushed as a “threat to society?
Do gun buybacks work?
Periodically, some cities offer a gun
buyback program in an attempt to get as many guns off the streets as
possible. Cities such as
Detroit,
Cincinnati,
Boston,
San Diego and
Los
Angeles have tried this program. This past
week,
Los Angeles offered a $200 grocery gift
card for anyone turning in an automatic weapon and a $100 gift card for
handguns, rifles, and shotguns.
Generally, the police don’t ask any
questions about the guns or where they came from and so no arrests are
made. In LA this past week, they asked people to place the guns in the
trunk of their cars, pull up to the buyback locations, open the trunk and allow
the police to remove the gun.
The preliminary count in Los Angeles yielded
around 1400 guns, 49 of which were assault weapons and 477 were handguns.
Officials in Los Angeles
and other cities with buyback programs say the programs are a success and help
to keep the streets safer, but are those claims really true?
According to the
National
Research Council of the National Academies report
(Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review) in 2004,
the buyback programs’ effect on crime rates is negligible at best. Their studies
showed that many of the guns turned in are old, inherited from previous owners,
and/or are in need of serious repair. None of the guns were found to be useful
or used in crimes. Not in this century
anyway!
I wonder just how many criminals turned
in their guns. Likely none! There was however an increase in home
break-ins and gun thefts just prior to the buyback program, and many of those
guns were recovered in the program. The conclusion can only be that the
gun buyback program actually served to promote an increase in criminal break-ins
and thefts just so the criminals could get the money from the police without
any questions being asked. Therefore, the police were promoting crime and
serving as a fence for stolen merchandise.
The only positive effect there is from
gun buyback programs is that it makes the city officials look like they are
doing something worthwhile to help prevent crime, even though they may actually
be increasing crime. Other than that, the programs are useless or
negative and should be stopped before any more houses are burglarized for their
antique useless guns.
Awr Hawkins is right: “If we are foolish
enough to embrace a ban on any weapon in the coming Congress then we are
unwittingly embracing a ban on every weapon.” Moreover, we are subsequently
banning all God given rights, because even as our present bureaucrats
are suffering from Political Brain-damage, at least our Framers new that an
armed Citizenry was
“necessary for the Security of a free State”, and therefore
necessary for the security of a public school…
Sent by my son Brad:
“The primary-school shooting
in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is
just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the
public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to
defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians
really serve.
The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women
to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn’t work they will
continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger
children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot
fight back against government tyranny.
Newtown is the U.S.A.’s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by
the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns
from the U.K.
It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried
out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be
questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.
It’s always the same people behind it – the gun-grabbers who want the people to
be defenceless against the gun-grabbers’ employers – the banksters who own all
of the politicians. They get their
politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people’s
freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian
police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.
The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who
was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring
involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and
others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban
and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the
elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100
years, which is proof of the above.
Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton
and made it look like Hamilton
committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn’t be questioned
. Hamilton was found in the school
gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman
PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on
either side of Hamilton’s
body.
The autopsy revealed that Hamilton
was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes.
There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a
second shooter who killed Hamilton.
Similarly, the first reports from Newtown
were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver
Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.
Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen
there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.
Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don’t fall for it.
Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.
All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning
the people from having guns. It works the same in every country – Hungerford in
England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur
in Australia and the list in
America
is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun
culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans’ love of guns
and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the
government.
Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and
Chairman Mao, to name just three.
If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters,
their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free
zones.
From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.”
A Columbine father - 12
years later sent by one of my readers!
Guess our national leaders didn't expect this, hmm?
Darrell Scott, the
father of Rachel Scott, a victim of the Columbine
High School shootings in Littleton , Colorado
, was invited to address the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee. What he said to our national leaders during
this special session of Congress was painfully honest.
They were not
prepared for what he had to say, nor was it received very well. But It needs to be heard by every parent,
every teacher, every politician, every sociologist, every psychologist, and
every so-called expert! These courageous
words spoken by Darrell Scott are powerful, penetrating, and deeply
personal. There is no doubt that God
sent this man as a voice crying in the wilderness... The following is a portion of the transcript:
"Since the dawn of
creation there has been both good & evil in the hearts of men and women. We
all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my
wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher,
and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries
out for answers."
"The first recorded act
of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field. The villain
was not the club he used... Neither was it the NCA, the National Club
Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only
be found in Cain's heart."
"In the days that
followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be
pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA. I am not a
hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA -
because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death.
Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they
had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent.
I am here today to declare
that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should
be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here
in this room. Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the
accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my
feelings best."
Your laws ignore our deepest
needs,
Your words are empty air.
You've stripped away our heritage,
You've outlawed simple prayer..
Now gunshots fill our classrooms,
And precious children die.
You seek for answers everywhere,
And ask the question "Why?"
You regulate restrictive laws,
Through legislative creed.
And yet you fail to understand,
That God is what we need!
Men and women are three-part
beings. We all consist of body, mind, and spirit. When we refuse to
acknowledge a third part of our make-up, we create a void that allows evil,
prejudice, and hatred to rush in and wreak havoc. Spiritual presences
were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history.
Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a
historical fact. What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor
God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when
something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs -- politicians immediately
look for a scapegoat such as the NRA. They immediately seek to pass more
restrictive laws that contribute to erode away our personal and private
liberties. We do not need more restrictive laws. Eric and Dylan would not have
been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who
spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our
own hearts.
As my son Craig lay under that
table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very
eyes, he did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to
deny him that right! I challenge every young person in America , and around the world, to realize that
on April 20, 1999, at Columbine
High School prayer was
brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those
students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred
disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate
with Him. To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA -- I give to
you a sincere challenge... Dare to examine your own heart before casting the
first stone!
My daughter's death will not
be in vain! The young people of this
country will not allow that to happen!"
Darrell Scott
Thanks for listening-de Andréa